Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil at high Reynolds number
|
|
- Lionel Beasley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AIAA SciTech Forum 9-13 January 017, Grapevine, Texas 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting AIAA Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of transonic buffet over a supercritical airfoil at high Reynolds number Yuma Fukushima 1 and Soshi Kawai Tohoku University, Aramaki-Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai , JAPAN In this study, the wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES) of transonic buffet phenomena over the OAT15A supercritical airfoil is conducted. The computational results are compared with zonal detached eddy simulation (DES) and experiment. By using the wall-modeled LES, the buffet onset is successfully predicted. The small separation near the trailing edge is also accurately estimated with buffet phenomena. Velocity properties show good agreement with experiment except the region in which the shock wave moves. From the trace of the shock wave movement, the buffet frequency which nearly equals to experimental value is obtained. The self-sustained oscillation mechanisms are investigated from the computational results. As a results, Lee s acoustic feedback loop model cannot predict the buffet frequency. On the other hand, the possibility of the proposed model is confirmed. Nomenclature ρ = density u i = velocity p = static pressure E = total energy T = temperature γ = ratio of specific heats R = gas constant τ ij = stress tensor q j = heat flux vector μ = dynamic viscosity μ t = turbulent eddy viscosity β = bulk viscosity S ij = strain rate tensor Pr = Prandtl number Pr t = turbulent Prandtl number c s = sound speed μ t,wm = turbulent eddy viscosity in wall model Pr t,wm = turbulent Prandtl number in wall model U = wall-parallel velocity c p = specific heat at constant pressure κ = von Karman constant y + = distance from the wall in wall units u + = wall-parallel velocity in wall units Cp = pressure coefficient h wm = interface height between large-eddy simulation and wall model t=t u /c = nondimensionalized time x s = shock position Re c = Reynolds number based on chord length c = chord length = free-stream Mach number M 1 Postdoctral Fellow, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Member AIAA. Associate Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Senior Member AIAA. 1 Copyright 017 by Yuma Fukushima and Soshi Kawai. Published by the, Inc., with permission.
2 α St s f s = angle of attack = Strouhal number of shock oscillation = nondimensionalized frequency of shock oscillation I. Introduction Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has achieved a significant progress in its algorithms and applications with increasing computational resource and became a necessary tool for developing fluid machines such as aircrafts. Due to the progress in the turbulence modelling, reliable results can be obtained from the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation of the cruise condition of aircrafts. However, it is still difficult to predict the flight performance in off-design conditions including flow separation. 1 The reliability in the off-design condition including flow separation is one of the challenging topics for current CFD. It is important for current CFD to enhance the reliability for unsteady phenomena and expand CFD applicability for a whole flight envelope. Transonic buffet is one of the famous unsteady phenomena related to a flying aircraft. Buffet phenomena involve a vibration related to weak flow separation after a shock wave on an airfoil and affect the comfort and safeness of aircraft operation. Many computational and experimental researches have been conducted to predict the buffet onset and understand a mechanism of the buffet phenomena. -15 For the computational investigation, large eddy simulation (LES) is suitable for such kind of unsteady flow including the flow separation. However, a turbulent boundary layer at high Reynolds number induces an unreachable computational cost in a wall-resolved LES. Chapman estimated the required number of grid points for the wall-resolved LES as N total =Re c 1.8, where Re c is a chord Reynolds number. 16 Choi and Moin revisited this estimation as N total =Re c 13/7. 17 To avoid the large computational cost, methods of modelling an inner-layer turbulence are proposed instead of resolving the turbulence in the inner part of the boundary layer. Especially for buffet phenomena, zonal detached eddy simulation (DES) has been used by Deck 4 and applied to the transonic buffet over the OAT15A supercritical airfoil. The results showed a good agreement with experiment by changing the thickness of a RANS region manually. 15 Subsequently, the new version of DES was proposed as delayed DES and applied to the buffet problem. 10,18 Another category of modelling the inner-layer turbulence is a wall-stress-model. 19 This kind of model is mainly based on the momentum conservation in a parallel shear flow. In the wall-modeled LES, only the inner layer of the boundary layer is modeled, and the outer layer is computed by LES. Kawai and Larsson pointed out the numerical and subgrid modeling errors derived from the LES computation near the wall and proposed the simple solution to bypass this errors in the wall-modeled LES computation. 0 This model was extended to the flow without equilibrium assumption and applied to a shock/boundary-layer interaction problem 1 and a separated flow over an airfoil near stall condition at high Reynolds number. From results, it is considered that the wall-models have potential to predict the buffet phenomena involving shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interactions. It is also noted that the wallmodels can predict the turbulent boundary layer of high Reynolds number without any experimental parameters. In this study, the proposed wall-models are applied to the transonic buffet simulation around the OAT15A to investigate the capability of the wall-modeld LES. Buffet flow conditions are Re c= , α=3.5deg, and M =0.73. Computational results are compared with the experimental data 3 and the zonal DES. 4 From the computational results, the self-subtained oscillation mechanisms are investigated. First, the buffet frequency is predicted by the acoustic feedback loop model. Next, we propose a new self-sustained oscillation model. The possibility of the proposed model is investigated. II. Numerical Methods A. Outer-layer LES equations The compressible spatially-filtered Navier-Stokes equations are solved in the LES mesh that is designed to resolve the outer-layer turbulence with modeled shear stresses and heat fluxes at the wall u j 0 (1) t x j p ij ui uiu j t x x x j i j E q E pu j ijui t x x x j j j j () (3)
3 p 1 E u 1 p RT k where the quantities are spatially-filtered and ρ is the density, u is the velocity, p is the static pressure, E is the total energy, T is the temperature, γ is the ratio of specific heats, and R is the gas constant. The stress tensor τ ij and heat flux vector q j are ij t S ij t Skk 3 (6) S ij 1 u u i j xj x i 1 t cs q j (8) 1Pr Prt x j where μ is the dynamic viscosity that is computed by Sutherland s law, β is the bulk viscosity, Pr is the Prandtl number, and c s is the sound speed. A selective mixed-scale model 3 is used to calculate the sub-grid scale turbulent eddy viscosity μ t and turbulent Prandtl number Pr t=0.9. B. Inner-layer equilibrium wall model The wall model with equilibrium assumption 0 solves the equilibrium boundary layer equations in an overlapping layer between the wall location y=0 and the interface height y=h wm d du t,wm 0 (9) dy dy d du t,wm dt t,wm U cp 0 (10) dy dy Pr Pr t,wm dy where U and T are the wall-parallel velocity and the temperature. According to the equations, solving the equilibrium wall model only needs the wall-normal grid connectivity. These equations are derived from the conservation equations for streamwise momentum and total energy with use of the standard approximations in equilibrium-boundary-layer flow. The pressure is assumed to be wall-normal independent and equal to the outer-layer LES solution at the interface height y=h wm. The mixing-length eddy-viscosity model with near-wall damping is used to determine the μ t,wm in the inner-layer wall model as (11) w t,wm y D D 1 exp y / A where τ w /ρ is the velocity scale in a boundary layer with the local instantaneous density and wall stress, y + is the distance from the wall in wall units and A + =17. The von Karman constant κ=0.41 and turbulent Prandtl number Pr t,wm=0.9. In this study, μ t,wm is computed from x/c=0.07 on both sides of the airfoil to model the forced laminarturbulent transition according to the experiment. (4) (5) (7) (1) C. Numerical schemes The spatial derivatives for interior nodes LES equations are evaluated by the sixth-order compact differencing scheme. 4 At boundary points 1 and and correspondingly at imax and imax-1, second-order one-sided and secondorder central formulas are employed. Aliasing errors are contained by applying an eight-order low-pass filter to the conserved variables with a filtering coefficient of Since the LES mesh only resolves the outer-layer turbulence and does not resolve the viscous sublayer, the first grid point off the wall in the LES mesh is in the log-layer. Due to the large mesh size, the time-step size can be increased by one- or two-order of magnitude depending on Reynolds number compared to the traditional wall-resolved LES. The third-order total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta scheme 6 is used for time integration. The localized artificial diffusivity method is used to robustly capture the shock waves while using the sixth-order compact differencing scheme. 7 3
4 The boundary condition at y=0 for the wall model equations is the adiabatic non-slip condition. At y=h wm, the wall parallel velocity U and the temperature T are imposed from the instantaneous LES solution. After solving the system of two coupled ordinary differential equations, the shear stress τ w and the heat flux q w at the wall can be directly computed and fed back to the LES as a boundary condition at the wall. D. Computational conditions In the wall-modeled LES computation, at least 0 mesh points shold resolve the boundary layer. Because the required grid resolution depends on the local boundary layer thickness, the small mesh size should be designed near the transition region to resolve the thin boundary layer and smoothly stretched in the streamwise direction along with the boundary layer development. A C-type structured mesh is generated as shown in Fig. 1. Outer boundary is located 80c away from the airfoil in η direction. The spanwise length is set to 0.065c which is the maximam separation width at x/c=0.75. Mesh points are N ξ N η N ζ= The mesh resolution is Δξ + =Δη + =Δζ + =9.6 based on the wall unit at x/c=0. and h wm + =60. The nondimensionalized time step is which results in the maximum Courant-Friedrichs-Levy number of 0.4. ξ Airfoil η y x (a) overall view y y x x z (b) two-dimensional grid, every tenth grid point (c) three-dimensional grid, every tenth grid point Fig. 1 Wall-modeled LES mesh III. Results and Discussions Figure shows the instantaneous Mach number distributions when the shock wave is at the most upstream and downstream position. During the shock oscillation, the shock wave moves from about 47%c to 59%c. At the trip position, expansion wave appears regardless of shock wave position because of the forced transition (Fig. (c)(d)). Behind the shock wave, the boundary layer is separated, and separated region is larger when the shock wave is in the upstream position (Fig. (e)(f)). Near the trailing edge, the size of separation largely varies depending on the shock wave position. (Fig. (g)(h)). Figure 3(a) shows the averaged Cp distribution. To investigate the capability of the buffet onset prediction, the result of RANS computation with Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model 8 at buffet condition and the wall-modeled LES 4
5 computation at non-buffet condition (Re c= , α=3.5deg, and M =0.715) are also shown. In the RANS computation, the shock wave does not moves, and typical Cp distribution is obtained. Zonal DES can predict the shock oscillation by tuning the size of RANS region. 15 However, the region in which the shock wave moves is estimated more upstream than experiment. Furthermore, the separation near the trailing edge is predicted larger. At the nonbuffet condition (M =0.715) of wall-modeled LES computation, the shock wave does not moves as well as RANS computation. Wall-modeled LES at the buffet condition (M =0.73) can predict the shock oscillation and Cp slope is also obtained. In addition, the small separation near the trailing edge is precisely predicted. The region in which the shock wave moves has some difference between the experiment and the wall-modeled LES. Previous studies pointed out the difference between setting and actual flow conditions in the experiment of OAT15A airfoil. 9,30 With confinement effect of the wind tunnel wall, the shock wave position moves more upstream than that in the infinitely far field condition. Figure 3(b) shows the surface pressure fluctuation. Zonal DES computation estimates the larger pressure fluctuation than experiment near the shock wave and the trailing edge. Wall-modeled LES provides small fluctuation at non-buffet condition and large fluctuation at buffet condition. At the buffet condition, the shock wave moves at more downstream region in the wall-modeled LES. Therefore, the flow is accelerated and the shock wave become stronger than that in the experiment. As a results, the pressure fluctuation becomes larger. Figure 4(a) shows the wall-normal velocity compared with log-law (ln(y + )/ ) at x/c=0.3 from h wm + =60. The velocity distribution satisfies the log-law. Figure 4(b) also shows the Reynolds stress distribution compared with RANS results at x/c=0.3 from h wm+ =60. Turbulent boundary layer is fully developed upstream of the shock wave. Figure 5 shows the velocity distribution. In the zonal DES computation by Deck, the computational region is divided in some zones, and the zones upstream of the shock are computed by D RANS simulation. Therefore, the velocity fluctuation of the zonal DES is much smaller than the others at x/c=0.8. Wall-modeled LES can predict the velocity fluctuation as shown in Fig. 5(b). At the region in which the shock wave moves, the averaged velocity and the velocity fluctuation depends on the shock wave position. In the zonal DES computation, the shock wave travels up to x/c=0.3. Therefore, the shock wave and the low speed region behind the shock wave reach up to x/c=0.35. As a results, the averaged velocity is estimated smaller and the velocity fluctuation is overestimated than experiment. Wallmodeled LES can predict the velocity distributions relatively well. On the other hand, this trend is opposite at x/c=0.55. The shock wave moves down to x/c=0.59 in the wall-modeled LES computation. Therefore, the shock wave and the high speed region ahead of the shock wave reaches down to x/c=0.55. As a results, the averaged velocity and the velocity fluctuation are overestimated in the wall-modeled LES. Velocity distributions downstream the shock wave are comparable with each other. Figure 6 shows the trace of the shock wave position in the wall-modeled LES computation. The shock wave moves from x/c=0.48 to x/c=0.6 at St s=f sc/m = This Strouhal number is 70.1Hz at c=30mm which nearly equals to the buffet frequency obtained from experiment. 5
6 (a) Near the airfoil, most upstream (b) Near the airfoil, most downstream (c) Trip position, most upstream (d) Trip position, most downstream (e) Near the shock, most upstream (f) Near the shock, most downstream (g) Near the TE, most upstream (h) Near the TE, most downstream Fig. Instantaneous Mach number distribution 6
7 (a) Averaged Cp (b) Pressure fluctuation Fig. 3 Pressure distribution (a) wall-normal velocity (b) Reynolds stress Fig. 4 Turbulent boundary layer properties at x/c=0.3 7
8 (a) Averaged velocity, x/c=0.8 (b) Velocity fluctuation, x/c=0.8 (c) Averaged velocity, x/c=0.35 (e) Averaged velocity, x/c=0.55 (d) Velocity fluctuation, x/c=0.35 (f) Velocity fluctuation, x/c=0.55 (g) Averaged velocity, x/c=0.75 (h) Velocity fluctuation, x/c=0.75 Fig. 5 Velocity distribution 8
9 50 40 p,m 30 Fig. 6 Shock wave location at 0.c away from the wall IV. Self-sustained Oscillation Mechanisms A. Acoustic feedback loop model It was confirmed that the buffet phenomena was accurately reproduced by WMLES from the previous section. In this section, the self-sustained oscillation mechanisms are investigated. There is an acoustic feedback loop model proposed by Lee as a typical model of the self-sustained oscillation mechanism. This feedback loop model is described as follows. Due to the movement of the shock wave, pressure waves are generated which propagate downstream in the separated flow region at a velocity a p. On reaching the trailing edge, the pressure waves generate upstream propagating acoustic waves at a velocity a u from the trailing edge. Acoustic waves interact with the shock wave and impart energy to maintain the shock oscillation. These two pressure waves are responsible for this feedback loop model, and it is considered that buffet frequency can be estimated by investigating the propagation velocities of these two pressure waves using equations as below t 0.65 c x s, ave c xs, ave Sts (13) ap au where St s is the buffet frequency, x s,ave is the mean shock position, a p and a u are velocities of pressure waves. We investigate the propagation velocities a p and a u of these two pressure waves from obtained results. Pressure variation from the averaged value is shown in Fig.7. It can be seen that acoustic waves are generated from the trailing edge and propagate upstream. The propagation velocity is estimated from the time history of the pressure variation. First, we investigate the acoustic waves to upstream. Figure 8(a) shows a time history of pressure variation outside the separation region. In this figure, the propagation velocity of acoustic waves can be estimated from the slope of pressure propagation. However, because Fig. 8(a) includes pressure fluctuations with low frequency due to shock wave oscillation and acoustic waves with high frequency from the turbulent boundary layer, we performs the filtering operation. Figure 8(b) is a low-pass filtered pressure variation with Strouhal number less than 1. Figure 8(c) is a bandpass filtered pressure variation with Strouhal number between 1.0 and 4.6 to remove the pressure variation associated with the shock wave oscillation and the acoustic waves generated from the turbulent boundary layer. From Fig. 8(b), large pressure variation associated with the shock wave oscillation can be confirmed. On the other hand, from the Fig. 8(c), several pressure waves propagating from the downstream to the upstream can be confirmed and their propagation velocity is estimated to be about -0.38U. 9
10 Next, the velocity of pressure waves propagating in the separated flow is estimated. Figure 9(a) shows the time history of pressure variation on surface. Large pressure variation associated with the shock wave oscillation is confirmed as shown in Fig. 8(a). Periodic fluctuations with a relatively high frequency are also confirmed. Looking at the cross sectional surface(fig. 9(b)), it can be seen that the periodic pressure variations are due to the vortical structures caused by the shock induced separation. The advection velocity of the vortical structures is estimated as 0.64U. Now, buffet frequency is predicted as about 0.5 using Eq. 13 with x s,ave=0.5. This frequency is much different from the buffet frequency estimated from the shock wave movement history. Therefore, we cannot confirm the possibility of Lee's model from the results of WMLES. B. Proposed model We propose a new self-sustained oscillation model in this section. In the proposed model, the shock wave oscillation depends on the pressure ratio forward and backward of the shock wave. Across the shock wave, the Rankine-Hugoniot equation is described in Eqs. 14 and 15. p 1 M1 1 (14) p 1 1 M M1 1 1 / M 1 / 1 where p 1 and p are pressures forward and backward of the shock wave. M 1 and M are the Mach number forward and backward of the shock wave. These equations mean that the effective Mach number of the shock wave is defined by the pressre ratio. When the pressure ratio chenges, the shock wave becomes weak or strong and moves forward or backward to balance the equations. Variation in pressure ratio is caused by the shock induced separation of the boundary layer. Figure 10 express the proposed model. When the shock wave is at the most downstream, relatively large separation occurs and the flow path is narrowed. Therefore, the pressure behind the shock wave decreases. As a result, pressure ratio decreases and the shock wave weakens. The weak shock wave moves upstream to balance the Eqs. 14 and 15. On the other hand, when the shock wave is at the most upstream, the separation disappears and the flow path is expanded. The pressure behind the shock wave increases. As a result, pressure ratio increases, and the shock wave becomes strong and moves downstream. Figure 11 shows the time history of the shock wave position, span averaged pressure and local Mach number near the trailing edge and the separation size. The shock wave position is defined by the position with maximum pressure ratio at 0.c away from the wall. Pressure and local Mach number are sampled at the point of x/c=0.9 and z/c=0.19 from the leading edge. The separation size is defined by the thickness from the wall to the position where Mach number is 0.5. In Fig. 11, due to the movement of the shock wave, other values fluctuate largely. When the shock wave is at the most downstream, the separation size begins to increase. As a results, the pressure decreases and the Mach number increases. When the shock wave is at the most upstream, the separation size begins to decrease. As a results, the pressure increases and the Mach number decreases. From the results, it can be seen that there is a time lag between the shock wave position and other values. Figure 1 show the span averaged Mach number at each time position. When the shock wave moves upstream, the size of the separation increases and the flow behind the shock wave is slightly accelerated. On the other hand, when the shock wave moves downstream, relatively low Mach number region behind the shock wave is confirmed. From the results, the possibility of the proposed model is confirmed. (15) 10
11 t t t t t t u c u c u c x/c p Fig. 7 Pressure variation from the averaged value x/c (a) Without filter (b) Low-pass filter with St 1.0 (c) Band-pass filter with 1.0 St 4.6 Fig. 8 Pressure variation out of the separation p 15.7 To upstream au=-0.38u x/c p 11
12 t t u c 15.7 p To downstream ap=0.64u x/c 1.0 (a) Pressure variation on surface (b) Pressure variation at cross section Fig. 9 Pressure waves to downstream 3Shock moves upstream (a) Shock wave most downstream 3Shock moves downstream (b) Shock wave most upstream Fig. 10 Proposed model Pressure decreases 1Large separation Pressure increases 1Small separation 1
13 p, M local p,m x s p t u t t c Fig. 11 Physical quantities fluctuation during shock wave oscillation (a) Shock wave most upstream M local Separation X s (b) Shock wave to downstream Separation size (c) Shock wave most downstream (d) Shock wave to upstream Fig. 1 Span-averaged flow field V. Conclusions Transonic airfoil buffet at high Reynolds number is computed by the wall-modeled LES. By using the wallmodeled LES, the buffet onset is successfully predicted. Pressure distributions show the wall-modeled LES can simulate the small separation near the trailing edge with buffet phenomena. The region in which the shock wave moves is estimated more downstream than experiment. The upstream turbulent boundary layer properties show the turbulent boundary layer is fully developed upstream of the shock wave. Velocity distributions upstream and downstream of 13
14 the shock wave agree well with the experiment. Near the shock wave, velocity distributions depend on the range of the shock wave oscillation. According to the trace of the shock wave position, the shock wave moves from x/c=0.48 to x/c=0.6 at St s= This frequency nearly equals to the buffet frequency of eximernt. We investigated the self-sustained oscillation mechanisms of buffet phenomena from the obtained result. As a result, Lee's acoustic feedback loop model was unable to predict the buffet frequency. On the other hand, we proposed the new self-sustained oscillation model. In the proposed model, the shock wave oscillation depends on the pressure ratio forward and backward of the shock wave, and the pressure variation is caused by the shock induced separation of the boundary layer. The possibility of the proposed model was confirmed from the obtained result. The remaining problem is determining the buffet frequency in the proposed model. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by MEXT as a social and scientific priority issue (Development of Innovative Design and Production Processes that Lead the Way for the Manufacturing Industry in the Near Future) to be tackled by using post-k computer. A part of this research used computational resources of the K computer provided by the RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science (Project ID:hp15054) References 1 E. N. Tinoco, D. R. Bogue, T-J. Kao, N. J. Yu, P. Li and D. N. Ball, Progress Toward CFD for Full Flight Envelop, The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 109, No. 1100, pp , 005. B. H. K. Lee, Self-sustained Shock Oscillations on Airfoils at Transonic Speeds, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 37, Issue, pp , L. Jacquin, P. Molton, S. Deck, B. Maury and D. Soulenvant, An Experimental Study of Shock Oscillation over a Transonic Supercritical Profile, AIAA Paper , S. Deck, Numerical Simulation of Transonic Buffet over a Supercritical Airfoil, AIAA Journal, Vol. 43, No. 7, J. D. Crouch, A. Garbaruk, D. Magidov, Predicting the Onset of Flow Unsteadiness based on Global Instability, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 4, Issue, pp , J. D. Crouch, A. Garbaruk, D. Magidov and A. Travin, Origin of Transonic Buffet on Aerofoils, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 68, pp , J. P. Thomas and E. H. Dowell, Airfoil Transonic Buffet Calculations Using the OVERFLOW Flow Solver, AIAA Paper , S. Koga, M. Kohzai, M. Ueno, K. Nakakita, N. Sudani, Analysis of NASA Common Research Model Dynamic Data in JAXA Wind Tunnel Tests, AIAA Paper , A. Hartmann, A. Feldhusen and W. Schroder, On the Interaction of Shock Waves and Sound Waves in Transonic Buffet Flow, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 5, No., F. Grossi, M. Braza and Y. Hoarau, Prediction of Transonic Buffet by Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulation, AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, No. 10, pp , J. Dandois, Experimental Study of Transonic Buffet Phenomenon on a 3D Swept Wing, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 8, Issue 1, T. Izumi, Y. Ogino, K. Sawada, An Attempt to Improve Prediction Capability of Transonic Buffet Using URANS, AIAA Paper , K. Kumada and K. Sawada, Improvement in Prediction Capability of Transonic Buffet on NASA-CRM Using URANS, AIAA Paper , K. Ishiko, A. Hashimoto, T. Aoyama and K. Takekawa, Detached-Eddy Simulation of NASA-CRM Transonic Buffet, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, T. Ishida, K. Ishiko, A. Hashimoto, T. Aoyama and K. Takekawa, Transonic Buffet Simulation over Supercritical Airfoil by Unsteady-FaSTAR Code, AIAA Paper , D. R. Chapman, Computational Aerodynamics Development and Outlook, AIAA Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, H. Choi and P. Moin, Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman s estimates revisited, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp , P. R. Spalart, S. Deck, M. L. Shur, K. D. Squires, M. Kh. Strelets, A. Travin, A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 0, No. 3, pp , J. Larsson, S. Kawai, J. Bodart and I. Bermejo-moreno, Large Eddy Simulation with modeled Wall-stress: Recent Progress and Future Directions, Mechanical Engineering Reviews, Vol. 3, No. 1, p , S. Kawai and J. Larsson, Wall-modeling in Large Eddy Simulation: Length Scales, Grid Resolution and Accuracy, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp , S. Kawai and J. Larsson, Dynamic Non-equilibrium Wall-modeling for Large Eddy Simulation at High Reynolds Numbers, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp ,
15 S. Kawai and K. Asada, Wall-modeled Large-eddy Simulation of High Reynolds Number Flow around an Airfoil near Stall Condition, Computers and Fluids, Vol. 85, pp , E. Lenormand, P. Sagaut, L. T. Phuoc, Large eddy simulation of subsonic and supersonic channel flow at moderate Reynolds number, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp , S. K. Lele, Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-like Resolution, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.103, Issue 1, pp.16-4, D. V. Gaitonde and M. R. Visbal, Pade-type Higher-order Boundary Filters for the Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA Journal, Vol.38, Issue 11, pp , S. Gottlieb and C. W. Shu, Total Variation Diminishing Runge-Kutta Scheme, Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp , S. Kawai, S. K. Shankar, and S. K. Lele, Assessment of Localized Artificial Diffusivity Scheme for Large-eddy Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.9, Issue 5, pp , B. S. Baldwin and H. Lomax, Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows, AIAA Paper 78-57, M. Thiery and E. Coustols, Numerical Prediction of shock induced oscillations over a D airfoil: Influence of turbulence modelling and test section walls, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 7, Issue 4, pp , M. Iovnovich and D. E. Raveh, Numerical Study of Shock Buffet of Three-Dimensional Wings, AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No., pp ,
Global Structure of Buffeting Flow on Transonic Airfoils
Global Structure of Buffeting Flow on Transonic Airfoils J.D. Crouch, A. Garbaruk, D. Magidov, and L. Jacquin Abstract The flow field associated with transonic airfoil buffet is investigated using a combination
More informationCOMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF SEPARATION CONTROL MECHANISM WITH THE IMAGINARY BODY FORCE ADDED TO THE FLOWS OVER AN AIRFOIL
COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF SEPARATION CONTROL MECHANISM WITH THE IMAGINARY BODY FORCE ADDED TO THE FLOWS OVER AN AIRFOIL Kengo Asada 1 and Kozo Fujii 2 ABSTRACT The effects of body force distribution on the
More informationDIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HIGH SPEED FLOW OVER CAVITY. Abstract
3 rd AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES (TAICDL), August 5-9 th, 2001, Arlington, Texas. DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF HIGH SPEED FLOW OVER CAVITY A. HAMED, D. BASU, A. MOHAMED AND K. DAS Department
More informationNumerical simulations of oblique shock/boundary-layer interaction at a high Reynolds number
Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 2014 489 Numerical simulations of oblique shock/boundary-layer interaction at a high Reynolds number By D. Szubert, I. Jang, G. I. Park
More informationZonal hybrid RANS-LES modeling using a Low-Reynolds-Number k ω approach
Zonal hybrid RANS-LES modeling using a Low-Reynolds-Number k ω approach S. Arvidson 1,2, L. Davidson 1, S.-H. Peng 1,3 1 Chalmers University of Technology 2 SAAB AB, Aeronautics 3 FOI, Swedish Defence
More informationFEDSM COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF OVEREXPANDED SUPERSONIC JET IMPINGEMENT ON A FLAT PLATE WITH/WITHOUT HOLE
Proceedings of FEDSM2007: 5 th Joint ASME/JSME Fluids Engineering Conference July 30-August 2, 2007, San Diego, CA, USA FEDSM2007-37563 COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF OVEREXPANDED SUPERSONIC JET
More informationWALL ROUGHNESS EFFECTS ON SHOCK BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTION FLOWS
ISSN (Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization, Volume 2, Special Issue
More informationMACH NUMBER EFFECTS ON BUFFETING FLOW ON A HALF WING-BODY CONFIGURATION
5 th 3AF International Conference on Applied Aerodynamics 3 March 1 April 215. Toulouse, France FP9-215-sartor MACH NUMBER EFFECTS ON BUFFETING FLOW ON A HALF WING-BODY CONFIGURATION Fulvio Sartor (1)
More informationSimulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity
Simulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity Muhamad Khairil Hafizi Mohd Zorkipli School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School
More informationAA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS
AA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS 1 / 29 AA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS Hierarchy of Mathematical Models 1 / 29 AA214B: NUMERICAL METHODS FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS 2 / 29
More informationBurst Frequency effect of DBD Plasma actuator on the control of separated flow over an airfoil
24 Burst Frequency effect of DBD Plasma actuator on the control of separated flow over an airfoil,, 252-5210 3-1-1, asada@flab.isas.jaxa.jp, ISAS/JAXA, 252-5210 3-1-1, fujii@flab.isas.jaxa.jp Kengo Asada,
More informationfluctuations based on the resolved mean flow
Temperature Fluctuation Scaling in Reacting Boundary Layers M. Pino Martín CTR/NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA 94035 Graham V. Candler Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
More informationLARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF FLOW OVER NOZZLE GUIDE VANE OF A TRANSONIC HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE
20 th Annual CFD Symposium, August 09-10, 2018, Bangalore LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF FLOW OVER NOZZLE GUIDE VANE OF A TRANSONIC HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE Bharathan R D, Manigandan P, Vishal Tandon, Sharad Kapil,
More informationOver-expansion Effects on Mach 3.0 Supersonic Jet Acoustics
14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 5-7 May 28, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada AIAA 28-286 Over-expansion Effects on Mach. Supersonic Jet Acoustics Taku Nonomura
More informationLarge eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step: effect of inflow conditions
June 30 - July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 P-26 Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step: effect of inflow conditions Jungwoo Kim Department of Mechanical System Design Engineering
More informationNumerical Methods in Aerodynamics. Turbulence Modeling. Lecture 5: Turbulence modeling
Turbulence Modeling Niels N. Sørensen Professor MSO, Ph.D. Department of Civil Engineering, Alborg University & Wind Energy Department, Risø National Laboratory Technical University of Denmark 1 Outline
More informationResolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model
Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model J.C. Kok Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model J.C. Kok This report is based on
More informationCOMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF THE SYNTHETIC JET ON SEPARATED FLOW OVER A BACKWARD-FACING STEP. Kozo Fujii
ASME 1 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE1 November 1-18, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada IMECE1-38767 COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF THE SYNTHETIC JET ON SEPARATED FLOW OVER
More informationWALL RESOLUTION STUDY FOR DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW USING A MULTIDOMAIN CHEBYSHEV GRID
WALL RESOLUTION STUDY FOR DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW USING A MULTIDOMAIN CHEBYSHEV GRID Zia Ghiasi sghias@uic.edu Dongru Li dli@uic.edu Jonathan Komperda jonk@uic.edu Farzad
More informationA combined application of the integral wall model and the rough wall rescaling-recycling method
AIAA 25-299 A combined application of the integral wall model and the rough wall rescaling-recycling method X.I.A. Yang J. Sadique R. Mittal C. Meneveau Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 228, USA
More informationThere are no simple turbulent flows
Turbulence 1 There are no simple turbulent flows Turbulent boundary layer: Instantaneous velocity field (snapshot) Ref: Prof. M. Gad-el-Hak, University of Notre Dame Prediction of turbulent flows standard
More information저작권법에따른이용자의권리는위의내용에의하여영향을받지않습니다.
저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할수없습니다. 변경금지. 귀하는이저작물을개작, 변형또는가공할수없습니다. 귀하는, 이저작물의재이용이나배포의경우,
More informationComputation of NACA0012 Airfoil Transonic Buffet Phenomenon with Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations
5th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 9-2 January 22, Nashville, Tennessee AIAA 22-699 Computation of NACA2 Airfoil Transonic Buffet Phenomenon with
More informationDNS, LES, and wall-modeled LES of separating flow over periodic hills
Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 4 47 DNS, LES, and wall-modeled LES of separating flow over periodic hills By P. Balakumar, G. I. Park AND B. Pierce Separating flow in
More informationNumerical Investigation of the Transonic Base Flow of A Generic Rocket Configuration
1 Numerical Investigation of the Transonic Base Flow of A Generic Rocket Configuration A. Henze, C. Glatzer, M. Meinke, W. Schröder Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany March 21,
More informationAerodynamic force analysis in high Reynolds number flows by Lamb vector integration
Aerodynamic force analysis in high Reynolds number flows by Lamb vector integration Claudio Marongiu, Renato Tognaccini 2 CIRA, Italian Center for Aerospace Research, Capua (CE), Italy E-mail: c.marongiu@cira.it
More informationOn the feasibility of merging LES with RANS for the near-wall region of attached turbulent flows
Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 1998 267 On the feasibility of merging LES with RANS for the near-wall region of attached turbulent flows By Jeffrey S. Baggett 1. Motivation and objectives
More informationA Multi-Dimensional Limiter for Hybrid Grid
APCOM & ISCM 11-14 th December, 2013, Singapore A Multi-Dimensional Limiter for Hybrid Grid * H. W. Zheng ¹ 1 State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy
More informationNumerical Simulation of Flow Separation Control using Multiple DBD Plasma Actuators
Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 1865-1875, 2016. Available online at www.jafmonline.net, ISSN 1735-3572, EISSN 1735-3645. DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jafm.68.235.25325 Numerical Simulation
More informationLarge Eddy Simulation of Three-Stream Jets
Large Eddy Simulation of Three-Stream Jets J. Xiong 1, F. Liu 2, and D. Papamoschou 3 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697 We present a computational study of three-stream jets simulating
More information2.3 The Turbulent Flat Plate Boundary Layer
Canonical Turbulent Flows 19 2.3 The Turbulent Flat Plate Boundary Layer The turbulent flat plate boundary layer (BL) is a particular case of the general class of flows known as boundary layer flows. The
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 79 (2014 ) 49 54
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 79 (2014 ) 49 54 37th National Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (37th NCTAM 2013) & The 1st International Conference
More informationPredictions of Aero-Optical Distortions Using LES with Wall Modeling
Predictions of Aero-Optical Distortions Using LES with Wall Modeling Mohammed Kamel, Kan Wang and Meng Wang University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 Large-eddy simulation (LES) with wall-modeling
More information[N175] Development of Combined CAA-CFD Algorithm for the Efficient Simulation of Aerodynamic Noise Generation and Propagation
The 32nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering Jeju International Convention Center, Seogwipo, Korea, August 25-28, 2003 [N175] Development of Combined CAA-CFD Algorithm for
More informationLarge-eddy simulations for wind turbine blade: rotational augmentation and dynamic stall
Large-eddy simulations for wind turbine blade: rotational augmentation and dynamic stall Y. Kim, I.P. Castro, and Z.T. Xie Introduction Wind turbines operate in the atmospheric boundary layer and their
More information3D DYNAMIC STALL SIMULATION OF FLOW OVER NACA0012 AIRFOIL AT 10 5 AND 10 6 REYNOLDS NUMBERS
3D DYNAMIC STALL SIMULATION OF FLOW OVER NACA0012 AIRFOIL AT 10 5 AND 10 6 REYNOLDS NUMBERS Venkata Ravishankar Kasibhotla Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
More informationSIMULATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL INCOMPRESSIBLE CAVITY FLOWS
ICAS 2000 CONGRESS SIMULATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL INCOMPRESSIBLE CAVITY FLOWS H Yao, R K Cooper, and S Raghunathan School of Aeronautical Engineering The Queen s University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN,
More informationTurbulent Boundary Layers & Turbulence Models. Lecture 09
Turbulent Boundary Layers & Turbulence Models Lecture 09 The turbulent boundary layer In turbulent flow, the boundary layer is defined as the thin region on the surface of a body in which viscous effects
More informationAerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow. J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman. Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen
Aerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen Source: A. Šoda, PhD thesis, 2006 Slide 2/39 Introduction
More informationHybrid LES RANS Method Based on an Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model
Hybrid RANS Method Based on an Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model Benoit Jaffrézic, Michael Breuer and Antonio Delgado Institute of Fluid Mechanics, LSTM University of Nürnberg bjaffrez/breuer@lstm.uni-erlangen.de
More informationAPPLICATION OF HYBRID CFD/CAA TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS IN TRANSONIC FLOWS
TASK QUARTERLY Vol. 17, Nos 3 4, 2013, pp. 145 154 APPLICATION OF HYBRID CFD/CAA TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS IN TRANSONIC FLOWS SŁAWOMIR DYKAS, WŁODZIMIERZ WRÓBLEWSKI AND SEBASTIAN RULIK
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 4 Aug 2014
A hybrid RANS/LES framework to investigate spatially developing turbulent boundary layers arxiv:1408.1060v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 4 Aug 2014 Sunil K. Arolla a,1, a Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace
More informationMasters in Mechanical Engineering. Problems of incompressible viscous flow. 2µ dx y(y h)+ U h y 0 < y < h,
Masters in Mechanical Engineering Problems of incompressible viscous flow 1. Consider the laminar Couette flow between two infinite flat plates (lower plate (y = 0) with no velocity and top plate (y =
More informationDETACHED-EDDY SIMULATION OF FLOW PAST A BACKWARD-FACING STEP WITH A HARMONIC ACTUATION
DETACHED-EDDY SIMULATION OF FLOW PAST A BACKWARD-FACING STEP WITH A HARMONIC ACTUATION Liang Wang*, Ruyun Hu*, Liying Li*, Song Fu* *School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,
More informationLarge-eddy simulation of jet mixing in a supersonic turbulent crossflow
Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 8 9 Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in a supersonic turbulent crossflow By S. Kawai AN S. K. Lele. Motivation and objectives Important recent research
More informationCurriculum Vitae of Sergio Pirozzoli
Curriculum Vitae of Sergio Pirozzoli Address University of Rome La Sapienza Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Via Eudossiana 18 00184, Roma Contact tel.: +39 06 44585202 fax : +39 06 4881759
More informationCHAPTER 7 SEVERAL FORMS OF THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION
CHAPTER 7 SEVERAL FORMS OF THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION 7.1 THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS Under the assumption of a Newtonian stress-rate-of-strain constitutive equation and a linear, thermally conductive medium,
More informationHigh Speed Aerodynamics. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath
Welcome to High Speed Aerodynamics 1 Lift, drag and pitching moment? Linearized Potential Flow Transformations Compressible Boundary Layer WHAT IS HIGH SPEED AERODYNAMICS? Airfoil section? Thin airfoil
More information1. Introduction Some Basic Concepts
1. Introduction Some Basic Concepts 1.What is a fluid? A substance that will go on deforming in the presence of a deforming force, however small 2. What Properties Do Fluids Have? Density ( ) Pressure
More informationA Computational Investigation of a Turbulent Flow Over a Backward Facing Step with OpenFOAM
206 9th International Conference on Developments in esystems Engineering A Computational Investigation of a Turbulent Flow Over a Backward Facing Step with OpenFOAM Hayder Al-Jelawy, Stefan Kaczmarczyk
More informationWall-modeled large eddy simulation in complex geometries with application to high-lift devices
Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 211 37 Wall-modeled large eddy simulation in complex geometries with application to high-lift devices By J. Bodart AND J. Larsson 1. Motivation and
More informationAn Investigation of Tip-Vortex Turbulence Structure using Large-Eddy Simulation
An Investigation of Tip-Vortex Turbulence Structure using Large-Eddy Simulation 1 David Hanson ; 1 Michael Kinzel; 1 Kyle Sinding; and 1 Michael Krane 1 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
More informationImplicit Large Eddy Simulation of Transitional Flow over a SD7003 Wing Using High-order Spectral Difference Method
40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 28 June - 1 July 2010, Chicago, Illinois AIAA 2010-4442 Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of Transitional Flow over a SD7003 Wing Using High-order Spectral Difference
More informationMULTIGRID CALCULATIONS FOB. CASCADES. Antony Jameson and Feng Liu Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
MULTIGRID CALCULATIONS FOB. CASCADES Antony Jameson and Feng Liu Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 0544 1. Introduction Development of numerical methods for internal flows such as the flow in gas turbines
More informationDirect Numerical Simulation of Aeolian Tones
THE 5 TH ASIAN COMPUTAITIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS BUSAN, KOREA, OCTOBER 27-30, 2003 Direct Numerical Simulation of Aeolian Tones Osamu Inoue 1 1. Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University,2-1-1 Katahira,
More informationPreliminary Study of the Turbulence Structure in Supersonic Boundary Layers using DNS Data
35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, June 6 9, 2005/Toronto,Canada Preliminary Study of the Turbulence Structure in Supersonic Boundary Layers using DNS Data Ellen M. Taylor, M. Pino Martín and Alexander
More informationThe Simulation of Wraparound Fins Aerodynamic Characteristics
The Simulation of Wraparound Fins Aerodynamic Characteristics Institute of Launch Dynamics Nanjing University of Science and Technology Nanjing Xiaolingwei 00 P. R. China laithabbass@yahoo.com Abstract:
More informationBoundary layer flows The logarithmic law of the wall Mixing length model for turbulent viscosity
Boundary layer flows The logarithmic law of the wall Mixing length model for turbulent viscosity Tobias Knopp D 23. November 28 Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations Consider the RANS equations with
More informationElliptic Trailing Edge for a High Subsonic Turbine Cascade
Elliptic Trailing Edge for a High Subsonic Turbine Cascade Mahmoud M. El-Gendi 1, Mohammed K. Ibrahim 2, Koichi Mori 3, and Yoshiaki Nakamura 4 1 Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya
More informationSeparation delay via hydro-acoustic control of a NACA 4412 airfoil in pre-stalled conditions. arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 29 Jan 2017
Separation delay via hydro-acoustic control of a NACA 4412 airfoil in pre-stalled conditions arxiv:1701.08429v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 29 Jan 2017 Julien Bodart a,, Carlo Scalo b,, Grigory Shelekhov a and Laurent
More informationLES Study of Shock Wave and Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction
51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 07-10 January 2013, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas AIAA 2013-0984 LES Study of Shock Wave and
More information41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 6-9 January 2003, Reno, Nevada Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction
4st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 6-9 January 003, Reno, Nevada Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction AIAA 003-65 Krishnendu Sinha*, Krishnan Mahesh and Graham V. Candler
More informationA parametrized non-equilibrium wall-model for large-eddy simulations
Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 212 127 A parametrized non-equilibrium wall-model for large-eddy simulations By S. Hickel, E. Touber, J. Bodart AND J. Larsson Wall-models
More informationPEMP ACD2505. M.S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru
Governing Equations of Fluid Flow Session delivered by: M. Sivapragasam 1 Session Objectives -- At the end of this session the delegate would have understood The principle of conservation laws Different
More informationVelocity Fluctuations in a Particle-Laden Turbulent Flow over a Backward-Facing Step
Copyright c 2004 Tech Science Press CMC, vol.1, no.3, pp.275-288, 2004 Velocity Fluctuations in a Particle-Laden Turbulent Flow over a Backward-Facing Step B. Wang 1, H.Q. Zhang 1, C.K. Chan 2 and X.L.
More informationEFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER ON THE UNSTEADY FLOW AND ACOUSTIC FIELDS OF SUPERSONIC CAVITY
Proceedings of FEDSM 03 4TH ASME_JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 6 11, 2003 FEDSM2003-45473 EFFECT OF REYNOLDS NUMBER ON THE UNSTEADY FLOW AND ACOUSTIC FIELDS OF SUPERSONIC
More informationRECENT near-sonic and low-sonic boom transport aircraft
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT Vol. 44, No. 6, November December 2007 Aerodynamic Characteristics of Bodies of Revolution at Near-Sonic Speeds Brenda M. Kulfan, John E. Bussoletti, and Craig L. Hilmes The Boeing
More informationAeroacoustics, Launcher Acoustics, Large-Eddy Simulation.
Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, July 9-13, 2012 ICCFD7-2012-3104 ICCFD7-3104 Analysis of Acoustic Wave from Supersonic Jets Impinging to an
More informationNumerical investigation of the compressible flow past an aerofoil
J. Fluid Mech. (21), vol. 643, pp. 97 126. c Cambridge University Press 29 doi:1.117/s22112999196 97 Numerical investigation of the compressible flow past an aerofoil LI-WEI CHEN, CHANG-YUE XU AND XI-YUN
More informationNumerical Simulation of a Blunt Airfoil Wake
6th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference Crown Plaza, Gold Coast, Australia 2-7 December 7 Numerical Simulation of a Blunt Airfoil Wake C.J. Doolan School of Mechanical Engineering University of Adelaide,
More informationIntroduction to Aerodynamics. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)
Introduction to Aerodynamics Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Aerodynamic Forces All aerodynamic forces are generated wither through pressure distribution or a shear stress distribution on a body. The
More informationLES of the trailing-edge flow and noise of a NACA0012 airfoil near stall
Center for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program 8 7 LES of the trailing-edge flow and noise of a NACA airfoil near stall By S. Moreau, J. Christophe AND M. Roger Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes
More informationA NEW MODELING OF SHEET CAVITATION CONSIDERING THE THERMODYNAMIC EFFECTS. Yumiko Sekino Ebara Cooporation, Ltd., Ota-ku, Tokyo JAPAN
Cav3-GS-6-3 Fifth International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV3) Osaka, Japan, November -4, 3 A NEW MODELING OF SHEET CAVITATION CONSIDERING THE THERMODYNAMIC EFFECTS Takashi Tokumasu Institute of Fluid
More informationURANS Computations of Cavitating Flow around a 2-D Wedge by Compressible Two-Phase Flow Solver
URANS Computations of Cavitating Flow around a 2-D Wedge by Compressible Two-Phase Flow Solver *Yohan Choe 1), Hyeongjun Kim 1), Chongam Kim 2) 1), 2) Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National
More informationParallel Computation of Forced Vibration for A Compressor Cascade
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9-2 January 26, Reno, Nevada AIAA 26-628 AIAA Paper 26-628 Parallel Computation of Forced Vibration for A Compressor Cascade Zongjun Hu and Gecheng Zha
More informationNumerical and Experimental Investigations on Mach 2 and 4 Pseudo-Shock Waves in a Square Duct
Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. Vol. 47, No. 56, pp. 24 3, 24 Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Mach 2 and 4 Pseudo-Shock Waves in a Square Duct By Liqun SUN, Hiromu SUGIYAMA, Kazuhide MIZOBATA,
More informationGiven the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate?
water stream fixed but free to rotate Given the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate? ) Clockwise 2) Counter-clockwise 3) Not enough information F y U 0 U F x V=0 V=0
More informationINVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW OVER AN OSCILLATING CYLINDER WITH THE VERY LARGE EDDY SIMULATION MODEL
ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, G. Stefanou, V. Plevris (eds.) Crete Island, Greece, 5 10 June
More informationNumerical Study of Transonic Buffet on a Supercritical Airfoil
AIAA JOURNAL Vol. 44, No. 3, March 2006 Numerical Study of Transonic Buffet on a Supercritical Airfoil Q. Xiao and H. M. Tsai National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore and
More informationAttached and Detached Eddy Simulation
Attached and Detached Eddy Simulation Philippe R. Spalart Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle, USA Mikhail K. Strelets Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University and New Technologies and Services (NTS),
More informationWALL PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS IN A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER AFTER BLOWING OR SUCTION
WALL PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS IN A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER AFTER BLOWING OR SUCTION Joongnyon Kim, Kyoungyoun Kim, Hyung Jin Sung Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science
More informationEVALUATION OF TRANSONIC BUFFETING ONSET BOUNDARY ESTIMATED BY TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE DIVERGENCE AND RMS DATA OF WING VIBRATION
EVALUATION OF TRANSONIC BUFFETING ONSET BOUNDARY ESTIMATED BY TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE DIVERGENCE AND RMS DATA OF WING VIBRATION Rodrigo Sorbilli C. de Sousa, Roberto da Motta Girardi Roberto Gil Annes da
More informationColloquium FLUID DYNAMICS 2012 Institute of Thermomechanics AS CR, v.v.i., Prague, October 24-26, 2012 p.
Colloquium FLUID DYNAMICS 212 Institute of Thermomechanics AS CR, v.v.i., Prague, October 24-26, 212 p. ON A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC FLOW OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN T. Bodnár, L. Beneš
More informationA HARMONIC BALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS AND AEROELASTICITY
' - ' Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition November 17-22, 22, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA IMECE-22-3232 A HARMONIC ALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL
More informationRANS Solutions Using High Order Discontinuous Galerkin Methods
RANS Solutions Using High Order Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Ngoc Cuong Nguyen, Per-Olof Persson and Jaime Peraire Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2139, U.S.A. We present a practical
More informationInvestigation of Non-synchronous Vibration Mechanism for a High Speed Axial Compressor Using Delayed DES
AIAA SciTech 13-17 January 2014, National Harbor, Maryland 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting AIAA 2014-0789 Investigation of Non-synchronous Vibration Mechanism for a High Speed Axial Compressor Using Delayed
More informationHybrid RANS-LES Modelling on a strongly detached turbulent flow around tandem cylinder at high Reynoldsnumber
Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling on a strongly detached turbulent flow around tandem cylinder at high Reynoldsnumber Gual Skopek, Marc a, Braza, Marianna a, Hoarau, Yannick b a. IMFT: Allée du Professeur Camille
More informationBrenda M. Kulfan, John E. Bussoletti, and Craig L. Hilmes Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, Washington, 98124
AIAA--2007-0684 Pressures and Drag Characteristics of Bodies of Revolution at Near Sonic Speeds Including the Effects of Viscosity and Wind Tunnel Walls Brenda M. Kulfan, John E. Bussoletti, and Craig
More informationA Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method For Uncertainty Propagation in CFD Simulations
An Extended Abstract submitted for the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada January 26 Preferred Session Topic: Uncertainty quantification and stochastic methods for CFD A Non-Intrusive
More informationDirect comparison between RANS turbulence model and fully-resolved LES
International Journal of Gas Turbine, Propulsion and Power Systems July 2016, Volume 8, Number 2 Direct comparison between RANS turbulence model and fully-resolved LES Takuya Ouchi 1 Susumu Teramoto 2
More informationDirect Numerical Simulations of Plunging Airfoils
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 4-7 January 010, Orlando, Florida AIAA 010-78 Direct Numerical Simulations of Plunging Airfoils Yves Allaneau
More informationThe E80 Wind Tunnel Experiment the experience will blow you away. by Professor Duron Spring 2012
The E80 Wind Tunnel Experiment the experience will blow you away by Professor Duron Spring 2012 Objectives To familiarize the student with the basic operation and instrumentation of the HMC wind tunnel
More informationTurbulent eddies in the RANS/LES transition region
Turbulent eddies in the RANS/LES transition region Ugo Piomelli Senthil Radhakrishnan Giuseppe De Prisco University of Maryland College Park, MD, USA Research sponsored by the ONR and AFOSR Outline Motivation
More informationExperimental investigation of flow control devices for the reduction of transonic buffeting on rocket afterbodies
Experimental investigation of flow control devices for the reduction of transonic buffeting on rocket afterbodies F.F.J. Schrijer 1, A. Sciacchitano 1, F. Scarano 1 1: Faculty of Aerospace Engineering,
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION AND MODELING OF UNSTEADY FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL. (AERODYNAMIC FORM)
Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences ISSN 1112-9867 Available online at http://www.jfas.info NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND MODELING OF UNSTEADY FLOW AROUND AN AIRFOIL. (AERODYNAMIC FORM) M. Y. Habib
More informationA high-order discontinuous Galerkin solver for 3D aerodynamic turbulent flows
A high-order discontinuous Galerkin solver for 3D aerodynamic turbulent flows F. Bassi, A. Crivellini, D. A. Di Pietro, S. Rebay Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Bergamo CERMICS-ENPC
More informationUnderstanding of the Flow Behaviour on a Helmholtz Resonator Excited by Grazing Flow
Understanding of the Flow Behaviour on a Helmholtz Resonator Excited by Grazing Flow Abstract Grazing flow passing over the quiescent fluid inside the cavity of a Helmholtz resonator can excite the resonator.
More informationMultidisciplinary Applications of Detached-Eddy Simulation to Separated Flows at High Reynolds Numbers
Multidisciplinary Applications of Detached-Eddy Simulation to Separated Flows at High Reynolds Numbers Scott A. Morton, Matt Steenman, James R. Forsythe and Kenneth Kyle D. Squires and Russell M. Cummings
More informationChapter 9 Flow over Immersed Bodies
57:00 Mechanics of Fluids and Transport Processes Chapter 9 Professor Fred Stern Fall 009 1 Chapter 9 Flow over Immersed Bodies Fluid flows are broadly categorized: 1. Internal flows such as ducts/pipes,
More informationApplication of a Helmholtz resonator excited by grazing flow for manipulation of a turbulent boundary layer
Application of a Helmholtz resonator excited by grazing flow for manipulation of a turbulent boundary layer Farzin Ghanadi School of Mechanical Engineering The University of Adelaide South Australia, 5005
More information