Astrodynamics (AERO0024)
|
|
- Ashlie French
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5B. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L)
2 Previous Lecture: Coplanar Maneuvers 5.1 INTRODUCTION Why? How? How much? When? 5.2 COPLANAR MANEUVERS One-impulse transfer Two-impulse transfer Three-impulse transfer Nontangential burns Phasing maneuvers 2
3 Motivation Coplanar transfers have wide applicability (e.g., phasing maneuvers and orbit raising). They alter 4 orbital elements: 1. Semi-major axis. 2. Eccentricity. 3. True anaomaly. 4. Argument of perigee. Noncoplanar transfers requires applying v out of the orbit plane and can therefore alter the last two elements: 1. Inclination. 2. RAAN. 3
4 5. Orbital Maneuvers 5.3 Noncoplanar transfers 5.4 Rendez-vous 4
5 5. Orbital Maneuvers 5.3 Noncoplanar transfers Inclination change RAAN change 5
6 Gaussian VOP (Lecture 4) θ F = eˆ + Teˆ + Neˆ R R T N θ 2 i& = a N cosθ2 µ 1+ ecosθ 2 (1 e ) ( ) Ω & = a N sinθ2 µ sin i 1+ ecosθ 2 (1 e ) ( ) Inclination change 6
7 Where? Cranking maneuver: with a single v maneuver, one wants to change only the inclination of the orbit plane. Where should we apply this maneuver? Inclination change 7
8 Where? At an Equator Crossing The two orbit planes intersect in the equatorial plane. We can therefore change the inclination at an equator crossing, by a simple rotation of the velocity vector. v r δ v v View down the line of intersection of the two orbital planes Inclination change 8
9 V Computation for a Circular Orbit ( ) v = v v = v v uˆ + v uˆ v uˆ 2 1 r 2 r1 r ( ) 2 v = v v + v + v 2v v cosδ r 2 r v = v, v = v r1 r v = δ 2vsin Inclination change 9
10 Inclination Changes Are Very Expensive δ v (% of v) How to minimize V? Is this cranking maneuver the minimum-fuel transfer? (60º, 100%) (24º, 41.6%) δ, degrees Inclination change 10
11 Real-Life Examples: Space Shuttle and Hubble The Space Shuttle is capable of a plane change in orbit of only about 3º, a maneuver which would exhaust its entire fuel capacity. What is Hubble space telescope s inclination? (HST) vs (KSC) Inclination change 11
12 What s Unique with this Picture? Too costly! Instead, NASA has chosen to have another shuttle ready to lift off to retrieve the astronauts if needed Inclination change 12
13 Minimizing V 1. Do not modify the radial velocity. 2. The maneuver should occur where the azimuth component is smallest, which is at apogee Inclination change 13
14 Minimum-Fuel Transfer: Bi-Elliptic Transfer One can always save fuel over a one-impulse maneuver by using three-impulses: noncoplanar bi-elliptic transfer. J.E. Prussing, B.A. Conway, Orbital Mechanics, Oxford University Press Inclination change 14
15 Case Study at DLR Inclination change 15
16 Direct Transfer from GTO (Hohmann) Direct transfer possible if the line of nodes of the GTO and the line of nodes of the Moon s orbit coincide, i.e., Ω=0. In that case, no inclination change is needed. For a GTO, this occurs twice a year because the nodal and apsidal lines coincide (power reasons, few eclipses) Inclination change 16
17 Direct Transfer from GTO (Hohmann-like) For small Ω, a small mid-course maneuver V2 is needed for inclination change Inclination change 17
18 Bi-elliptic Transfer from GTO For large Ω, the inclination change is too expensive. The apogee of the LTO is chosen to be 1e6 kms and the inclination change performed there is 17 degrees. Increased flight time of 50 days but savings of 115m/s Inclination change 18
19 Motivation for RAAN Change Constraints on the line of nodes may be imposed to a spacecraft (e.g., for rendez-vous): Launch window to match up the line of nodes. If we wait too long for such a window, the satellite can be launched sooner and thrust can be applied to change the line of nodes RAAN change 19
20 Why is RAAN Change Complicated? Ω & = i& = a a 2 (1 e ) N sinθ2 µ sin i 1 cosθ N cosθ2 µ θ 2 (1 e ) ( + e ) ( 1+ ecos ) 3 a a& = 2 Re sinθ T 1 e cos µ ( 1 e ) ( θ ) 2 a(1 e ) e& = Rsinθ + T cos + cos E µ ( θ ) ( + e θ ) 2 1 a(1 e ) T sinθ 2 cos & ω = Ω & cosi + R cosθ + e µ 1+ ecosθ M = nt χ, with & χ = A change in the node affects the argument of perigee (except for circular and polar orbits)! RAAN change ( θ θ ) θ ( θ ) a µ e θ 2 2 (1 e ) R 2e cos ecos + T sin 2 + ecos ( 1+ ecos ) 20
21 RAAN Change: Circular Orbits One-burn is sufficient. But where? Applying a change in velocity at any other points than the common points of intersection of the orbital planes will change both inclination and RAAN RAAN change 21
22 5. Orbital Maneuvers 5.4 Rendez-vous Hill Clohessy Wiltshire equations Gemini and Space Shuttle 22
23 Rendez-vous: Two Successive Phases 1. Long-distance navigation: basic maneuvers bring the spacecraft in a vicinity (<100 km) of the target in the same orbit plane. 2. Terminal rendez-vous: the interest is in the relative motion, i.e. the motion of the maneuvering spacecraft in relation to the target (spacecraft or neighboring orbit). Focus of the present discussion H-C-W equations 23
24 ISS & ATV Rescue of Intelsat-6: new perigee kick motor (STS-49) STS & HST
25 Basic Assumption The rendez-vous can be solved using the classical 2- body problem. But nonlinear equations of motion have to be solved and one should resort to numerical methods (e.g., Lambert s problem). Can we use approximate equations considering that distances are small relative to the dimensions of the orbit? Yes! Use linearization procedures H-C-W equations 25
26 Problem Statement chase r r 0 δr target (known orbit) δ r r = r0 + δr, <<< 1 r 0 What is the equation governing the relative motion δr? A rendez-vous occurs when δr = H-C-W equations 26
27 Mathematical Developments Relative motion as well! r&& = µ r r 3 r = r0 + δr 0 + δ δ && r = && r0 µ r r 3 r? r = ( r + δr).( r + δr) = r + 2 r. δr + δ r r r r δr = r0 3 2 Binomial theorem r r r δr = r H-C-W equations 27
28 Mathematical Developments 1 3 r0. δr δ && r = && r0 µ 3 5 r0 + δr r0 r0 ( ) Higher-order terms neglected δ && r = && r r µ µ 3 r. δr δr r r0 r0 r0 r&& = µ r r µ 3 0. δ δ r r && r = δ 3 r r 2 r0 r0 0 Linear ODE. Observer in an inertial frame H-C-W equations 28
29 Co-Moving Frame & Circular Orbit r r 0 δr ˆk ĵ î Local vertical coordinate frame Our focus is on a rotating observer in the local frame (e.g., an ISS astronaut watching the ATV) dω && r = && r0 + δr + Ω ( Ω δr) + 2Ω δ vrel + δarel = && r0 + δ&& r dt H-C-W equations ( ) 2 δ&& r = Ω Ω. δr Ω δr + 2Ω δ vrel + δarel 29
30 Co-Moving Frame & Circular Orbit δr = δ x ˆi + δ y ˆj + δ z kˆ δ v = δ x& ˆi + δ y& ˆj + δ z& kˆ rel δa = δ&& x ˆi + δ&& y ˆj + δ&& z kˆ rel Ω = nkˆ ( ) 2 δ&& r = Ω Ω. δr Ω δr + 2Ω δ vrel + δarel Interpretation of the terms? δ&& δ δ & δ&& ˆ δ δ & δ&& ˆ δ&& ˆ 2 2 r = ( n x 2 n y + x) i + ( n y + 2 n x + y) j+ z k Centrifugal Coriolis H-C-W equations 30
31 Co-Moving Frame & Circular Orbit δ&& δ δ & δ&& ˆ δ δ & δ&& ˆ δ&& ˆ 2 2 r = ( n x 2 n y + x) i + ( n y + 2 n x + y) j+ z k µ 3 r0. δr 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ 3 r0. δ x ˆ δ&& r = 3 δr r 2 0 = n δ x i + δ y j+ δ z k r 2 0i r0 r0 r0 δ&& x n δ x nδ y& = δ&& y + 2nδ x& = 0 2 δ&& z + n δ z = 0 Hill Clohessy Wiltshire equations: acceleration relative to a rotating observer fixed in the moving frame H-C-W equations 31
32 An Obvious Solution δ&& x n δ x nδ y& = δ&& y + 2nδ x& = 0 2 δ&& z + n δ z = 0 δ x =? δ y =? δ z =? δx=0, δy=constant. δz=harmonic motion (the out-of plane motion is decoupled from the in-plane motion). Physical interpretation? Two spacecraft on the same orbit H-C-W equations 32
33 In Matrix Form Linear ODEs with constant coefficient: we can solve them! 2 δ&& x 0 2n 0 δ x& 3n 0 0 δ x 0 δ&& y 2n 0 0 δ y& δ y = 0 2 δ z δ z 0 0 n δ z 0 && & Gyroscopic damping: imposes a rotation if there is a relative velocity H-C-W equations Centrifugal + gravitational terms: move away from the target if not on the same orbit 33
34 Interpretation Impulse to the left rotation due to Coriolis Forward impulse backward motion! Backward impulse forward motion! H-C-W equations 34
35 Solution δ&& y + 2nδ x& = 0 δ y& + 2nδ x = Cte = δ y& + 2nδ x 0 0 δ&& x 3n δ x 2nδ y& = 0 δ&& x + n δ x = 2nδ y& + 4n δ x δ x = Asin nt + B cos nt + δ y& + 4δ x n H-C-W equations 35
36 Solution: Overall δr( t) Φ ( t) δr ( t) Φ rv ( t 0 ) δ v ( t) 0 rr ( nt) sin nt 2 1 cos 0 n n δ x 4 3cos nt 0 0 δ x δ x& 0 2( cos nt 1) ( 4sin nt 3nt ) 0 δ y = 6( sin nt nt) 1 0 δ y + 0 δ y& 0 0 n n δ z 0 0 cos nt δ z 0 δ z & sin nt n δ x& 3nsin nt 0 0 δ x0 cos nt 2sin nt 0 δ x& 0 δ y& = 6n cos nt δ y + 2sin nt 4 cos nt 3 0 δ y& ( ) 0 0 δ z 0 0 nsin nt δ z cos nt δ z & & 0 δ v( t) Φ ( t) δr ( t) Φ vv ( t 0 ) δ v ( t) 0 vr H. Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, Elsevier H-C-W equations 36
37 Key Feature? ( nt) sin nt 2 1 cos 0 n n δ x 4 3cos nt 0 0 δ x δ x& 0 2( cos nt 1) ( 4sin nt 3nt ) 0 δ y = 6( sin nt nt) 1 0 δ y + 0 δ y& 0 0 n n δ z 0 0 cos nt δ z 0 δ z & sin nt n Secular terms! What do they mean? H-C-W equations 37
38 Example: HST and STS The HST is released from the Space Shuttle, which is in a circular orbit of 590 km altitude. The relative velocity of ejection is 0.1 m/s down, 0.04 m/s backwards and 0.02 m/s to the right. Find the position of HST after 5,10,20 minutes. ( nt) sin nt 2 1 cos 0 n n δ x 4 3cos nt 0 0 δ x δ x& 0 2( cos nt 1) ( 4sin nt 3nt ) 0 δ y = 6( sin nt nt) 1 0 δ y + 0 δ y& 0 0 n n δ z 0 0 cos nt δ z 0 δ z & n = = rad/s sin (-0.1;-0.04;-0.02) T nt n H-C-W equations 38
39 Example: HST and STS 5 minutes: ( ; ; ) T 10 minutes: ( ; ; ) T 20 minutes: ( ; ; ) T H-C-W equations 39
40 Example: HST and STS δ y (m) δ x (m) H-C-W equations 40
41 Further Reading on the Web Site They use Hill Clohessy Wiltshire equations! H-C-W equations 41
42 Solution: Overall δr( t) = Φ ( t) δr + Φ ( t) δ v rr 0 rv 0 δ v( t) = Φ ( t) δr + Φ ( t) δ v vr 0 vv 0 Linear analog of Kepler s equation Assumptions: 1. The two satellites are within a few kms of each other. 2. The target is in a circular orbit. 3. There are no external forces on the interceptor. Starting from t=0, how to exploit these equations for rendez-vous after a time t f? H-C-W equations 42
43 Two-Impulse Rendez-vous Maneuvers t = 0, δr and δ v known 0 0 Compute δ v + 0 for rendez-vous in a time t f 0 = Φ ( t ) δr + Φ ( t ) δ v + rr f 0 rv f 0 δ v = Φ ( t ) Φ ( t ) δr rv f rr f 0 v = δ v δ v Compute δ v = Φ ( t ) δr + Φ ( t ) δ v + f vr f 0 vv f 0 = Φ ( t ) δr + Φ ( t ) Φ ( t ) Φ ( t ) δr 1 vr f 0 vv f rv f rr f 0 Impose δ + = 0 v = δ v v f f f H-C-W equations 43
44 Physical Interpretation The initial velocity change places the vehicle on a trajectory which will intercept the origin at time t f. The final velocity change cancels the arrival velocity of the vehicle at the origin and completes the rendez-vous H-C-W equations 44
45 Example: HST and STS After 10 minutes, the STS astronauts want to retrieve HST. Compute the δv 0+ to rendez-vous in 5 and 15 minutes. 5 minutes: ( ; ; ) T 15 minutes: ( ; ; ) T H-C-W equations 45
46 Real Data: Gemini 10 and Agena 8 A 4-orbit rendez-vous plan similar to that of Gemini 6-7: O1: no maneuvers to allow spacecraft checkout. N H N CI N SR TPI TPF O2: height adjustment at perigee (0.2 m/s for orbital decay) phase adjustment maneuver at apogee (17 m/s). O3: switch to a circular orbit in the same plane as Agena (16 m/s). O4: terminal phase initiation (10 m/s) velocity matching (13 m/s) Total: ± 56 m/s Gemini and Space Shuttle 46
47 5.4.2 Gemini and Space Shuttle Nc: nominal corrective burn Nh: nominal height adjust burn
48 Real Data: Gemini 10 and Agena Gemini and Space Shuttle 48
49 Real Data: Gemini 10 and Agena Gemini and Space Shuttle 49
50 Real Data: Gemini 10 and Agena 8 50
51 STS-120 (Rendez-vous with ISS, Oct. 07) Date Time UTC Name Impulsion Orbite (m/s) (km x km) 23 15:46:44 MECO x :16:38 OMS-2 70, x :32:45 NC1 26, x :50:56 NC2 6, x :27:09 NC3 0, x :30:35 NH 7, x :24:45 NC4 2, x :55:43 Ti 2, x :12:45 MC1 0, x :26:20 MC2 0, x 334 Pour STS123: Gemini and Space Shuttle 51
52 STS-120 (Rendez-vous with ISS, Oct. 07) Gemini and Space Shuttle 52
53 5. Orbital Maneuvers 5.1 INTRODUCTION Why? How? How much? When? 5.2 COPLANAR MANEUVERS One-impulse transfer Two-impulse transfer Three-impulse transfer Nontangential burns Phasing maneuvers 53
54 5. Orbital Maneuvers 5.3 NONCOPLANAR TRANSFERS Inclination change RAAN change 5.4 RENDEZ-VOUS Hill Clohessy Wiltshire equations Gemini and Space Shuttle 54
55 In Summary Maneuvers can find many practical applications and may drive spacecraft design (fuel consumption). Focus on impulsive maneuvers (chemical propulsion). Most important maneuvers in Earth s orbit have been described (plane change, circularization, phasing, rendezvous). Maneuvers are not always intuitive: to catch a spacecraft one the same orbit, one must first decelerate! 55
56 Other maneuvers Combined maneuvers (e.g., circularization and inclination change for a GEO satellite). Fixed V maneuvers. 56
57 Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5B. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: Coplanar Maneuvers 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 Why? 5.1.2 How? 5.1.3 How much? 5.1.4 When?
More informationPrevious Lecture. Orbital maneuvers: general framework. Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions
2 / 48 Previous Lecture Orbital maneuvers: general framework Single-impulse maneuver: compatibility conditions closed form expression for the impulsive velocity vector magnitude interpretation coplanar
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5A. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) GEO drift: period The orbit inclination will increase to a maximum of 15 deg after 27.5 years and return
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5A. Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Course Outline THEMATIC UNIT 1: ORBITAL DYNAMICS Lecture 02: The Two-Body Problem Lecture 03: The Orbit
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) L05: Orbital Maneuvers Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) North Korea Launch Vehicle WorldView1 satellite (Google Earth). 0.5m resolution. 2 Course Outline THEMATIC
More informationSatellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN
Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers Dr Ugur GUVEN Orbit Maneuvers At some point during the lifetime of most space vehicles or satellites, we must change one or more of the orbital elements. For example,
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) L06: Interplanetary Trajectories Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation 2 Problem Statement? Hint #1: design the Earth-Mars transfer using known concepts
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 10. Interplanetary Trajectories Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation 2 6. Interplanetary Trajectories 6.1 Patched conic method 6.2 Lambert s problem
More informationSatellite Engineering
Satellite Engineering Universidad de Concepción November 2009 Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab University of Liège Satellite Engineering Universidad de Concepción November 2009 Day 3: Satellite
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit Interplanetary trajectories
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 4B. Non-Keplerian Motion Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) 2. Two-body problem 4.1 Dominant perturbations Orbital elements (a,e,i,ω,ω) are constant Real satellites
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #05 September 15, 2015 Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit
More informationMARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design
Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time and flight path angle as a function of orbital position Relative orbital
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 3B. The Orbit in Space and Time Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: The Orbit in Time 3.1 ORBITAL POSITION AS A FUNCTION OF TIME 3.1.1 Kepler
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #08 September 22, 2016 Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND
Orbital Mechanics Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit Interplanetary trajectories Planetary launch and
More informationPrevious Lecture. Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model. The Cid- Lahulla model 2 / 39
2 / 39 Previous Lecture Approximate solutions for the motion about an oblate planet: The Brouwer model The Cid- Lahulla model 3 / 39 Definition of Orbital Maneuvering Orbital maneuver: the use of the propulsion
More informationLecture D30 - Orbit Transfers
J. Peraire 16.07 Dynamics Fall 004 Version 1.1 Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers In this lecture, we will consider how to transfer from one orbit, or trajectory, to another. One of the assumptions that we
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Lecture #08 September 20, 2018 Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time in orbit
More informationMARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design
Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers Time and flight path angle as a function of orbital position Relative orbital
More informationASE 366K Spacecraft Dynamics
ASE 366K Spacecraft Dynamics Homework 2 Solutions 50 Points Total: 10 points each for 1.16, 1.19, 2.6, 2.7, and 10 points for completing the rest. 1.13 Show that the position vector is a min or max at
More informationOptimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers
Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering Vol. 21, No. 4 (2017) 11 16 c Lodz University of Technology Optimal Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Lagrange Multipliers Osman M. Kamel Astronomy
More informationFundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications
Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications Third Edition David A. Vallado with technical contributions by Wayne D. McClain Space Technology Library Published Jointly by Microcosm Press Hawthorne, CA
More informationRocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required
Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required ΔV Not in Taylor 1 Available Ignoring Aerodynamic Drag. The available Delta V for a Given rocket burn/propellant load is ( ) V = g I ln 1+ P
More informationMINIMUM IMPULSE TRANSFERS TO ROTATE THE LINE OF APSIDES
AAS 05-373 MINIMUM IMPULSE TRANSFERS TO ROTATE THE LINE OF APSIDES Connie Phong and Theodore H. Sweetser While an optimal scenario for the general two-impulse transfer between coplanar orbits is not known,
More informationEasyChair Preprint. Retrograde GEO Orbit Design Method Based on Lunar Gravity Assist for Spacecraft
EasyChair Preprint 577 Retrograde GEO Orbit Design Method Based on Lunar Gravity Assist for Spacecraft Renyong Zhang EasyChair preprints are intended for rapid dissemination of research results and are
More informationOrbital Mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Orbital Mechanics. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design
Discussion of 483/484 project organization Planetary launch and entry overview Energy and velocity in orbit Elliptical orbit parameters Orbital elements Coplanar orbital transfers Noncoplanar transfers
More informationASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Prox Ops, Lambert
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Prox Ops, Lambert Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado Boulder Lecture 15: ProxOps, Lambert 1 Announcements Homework #5 is due next Friday 10/10 CAETE by Friday
More informationOn The Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Energy Concepts Part I
Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering Vol. 15, No. (011) 183 191 c Technical University of Lodz On The Generalized Hohmann Transfer with Plane Change Using Energy Concepts Part I Osman M. Kamel Astronomy
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Numerical Methods Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Why Different Propagators? Analytic propagation: Better understanding of the perturbing forces. Useful
More informationLAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES. Dr. Marwah Ahmed
LAUNCHES AND LAUNCH VEHICLES Dr. Marwah Ahmed Outlines 2 Video (5:06 min) : https://youtu.be/8t2eyedy7p4 Introduction Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELVs) Placing Satellite into GEO Orbit Introduction 3 Introduction
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) L04: Non-Keplerian Motion Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Non-Keplerian Motion 4 Dominant Perturbations Analytic Treatment Numerical Methods Concluding Remarks
More informationESMO Mission Analysis
Changing the economics of space ESMO Mission Analysis SRR Workshop Alison Gibbings 22 nd 26 th March 2010 Review of the existing baseline Sensitivity analysis Contents At lunar Injection Along the WSB-Moon
More informationNAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH
c o d e 5 9 5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Michael Mesarch Michael.A.Mesarch@nasa.gov NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH www.nasa.gov Outline Orbital Elements Orbital Precession Differential
More information5.12 The Aerodynamic Assist Trajectories of Vehicles Propelled by Solar Radiation Pressure References...
1 The Two-Body Problem... 1 1.1 Position of the Problem... 1 1.2 The Conic Sections and Their Geometrical Properties... 12 1.3 The Elliptic Orbits... 20 1.4 The Hyperbolic and Parabolic Trajectories...
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 3. The Orbit in Space Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation: Space We need means of describing orbits in three-dimensional space. Example: Earth s oblateness
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Dominant Perturbations Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation Assumption of a two-body system in which the central body acts gravitationally as a point
More informationAUTONOMOUS AND ROBUST RENDEZVOUS GUIDANCE ON ELLIPTICAL ORBIT SUBJECT TO J 2 PERTURBATION.
AUTONOMOUS AND ROBUST RENDEZVOUS GUIDANCE ON ELLIPTICAL ORBIT SUBJECT TO J 2 PERTURBATION Emmanuel GOGIBUS (1), Hervé CHARBONNEL (2), Patrick DELPY (3) (1) Astrium Space Transportation, 66 route de Verneuil,
More informationRAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION. Daniel X. Junker (1) Phone: ,
RAPID GEOSYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER ORBIT ASCENT PLAN GENERATION Daniel X. Junker (1) (1) LSE Space GmbH, Argelsrieder Feld 22, 82234 Wessling, Germany, Phone: +49 160 9111 6696, daniel.junker@lsespace.com Abstract:
More informationCHANGING INCLINATION OF EARTH SATELLITES USING THE GRAVITY OF THE MOON
CHANGING INCLINATION OF EARTH SATELLITES USING THE GRAVITY OF THE MOON KARLA DE SOUZA TORRES AND A. F. B. A. PRADO Received 3 August 005; Revised 14 April 006; Accepted 18 April 006 We analyze the problem
More informationSpace flying vehicles orbital motion control system synthesis: power invariants
CHAOS 010, 3rd Chaotic Modeling and Simulation 1-4 June 010 Space flying vehicles orbital motion control system synthesis: power invariants Alexander A. Kolesnikov (PhD) Taganrog Institute of Technology
More informationThe Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Aerospace Engineering DELTA-V FEASIBILITY OF PIGGYBACK LUNAR TRANSFERS
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Aerospace Engineering DELTA-V FEASIBILITY OF PIGGYBACK LUNAR TRANSFERS A Thesis in Aerospace Engineering by Skyler Shuford 2015 Skyler
More informationChapter 8. Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories. to Geo-stationary Orbits
Chapter 8 Precise Lunar Gravity Assist Trajectories to Geo-stationary Orbits Abstract A numerical search technique for designing a trajectory that transfers a spacecraft from a high inclination Earth orbit
More informationChapter 5 - Part 1. Orbit Perturbations. D.Mortari - AERO-423
Chapter 5 - Part 1 Orbit Perturbations D.Mortari - AERO-43 Orbital Elements Orbit normal i North Orbit plane Equatorial plane ϕ P O ω Ω i Vernal equinox Ascending node D. Mortari - AERO-43 Introduction
More informationRelative Orbital Elements: Theory and Applications
aa.stanford.edu stanford.edu Relative Orbital Elements: Theory and Applications Simone D Amico, PhD Assist. Prof. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Director, Space Rendezvous Laboratory (SLAB) Slide 1 Table
More informationSession 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers
Session 6: Analytical Approximations for Low Thrust Maneuvers As mentioned in the previous lecture, solving non-keplerian problems in general requires the use of perturbation methods and many are only
More informationOptimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit
Optimization of Eccentricity during a Two Burn Station Acquisition Sequence of a Geosynchronous Orbit A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) The Orbit in Space and Time Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Newton s laws F = ma F g mm = G r 1 2 uˆ 2 r Relative motion μ r = r 3 r Energy conserv. 2 v μ
More informationSpace Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO
Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO Massimiliano Vasile, Willem van der Weg, Marilena Di Carlo Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Strathclyde, Glasgow 5th Interplanetary
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 5. Dominant Perturbations Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Motivation Assumption of a two-body system in which the central body acts gravitationally as a point
More informationStudy of the Fuel Consumption for Station-Keeping Maneuvers for GEO satellites based on the Integral of the Perturbing Forces over Time
Study of the Fuel Consumption for Station-Keeping Maneuvers for GEO satellites based on the Integral of the Perturbing Forces over Time THAIS CARNEIRO OLIVEIRA 1 ; ANTONIO FERNANDO BERTACHINI DE ALMEIDA
More informationSIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE
SIMBOL-X: A FORMATION FLYING MISSION ON HEO FOR EXPLORING THE UNIVERSE P. Gamet, R. Epenoy, C. Salcedo Centre National D Etudes Spatiales (CNES) 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 TOULOUSE Cedex 9, France
More informationCourse Overview/Orbital Mechanics
Course Overview/Orbital Mechanics Course Overview Challenges of launch and entry Course goals Web-based Content Syllabus Policies Project Content An overview of orbital mechanics at point five past lightspeed
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3A performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
More informationThe Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight
The Astrodynamics and Mechanics of Orbital Spaceflight Vedant Chandra 11-S1, TSRS Moulsari 1 1 Introduction to Rocketry Before getting into the details of orbital mechanics, we must understand the fundamentals
More informationOptimal Control based Time Optimal Low Thrust Orbit Raising
Optimal Control based Time Optimal Low Thrust Orbit Raising Deepak Gaur 1, M. S. Prasad 2 1 M. Tech. (Avionics), Amity Institute of Space Science and Technology, Amity University, Noida, U.P., India 2
More informationOrbits in Geographic Context. Instantaneous Time Solutions Orbit Fixing in Geographic Frame Classical Orbital Elements
Orbits in Geographic Context Instantaneous Time Solutions Orbit Fixing in Geographic Frame Classical Orbital Elements Instantaneous Time Solutions Solution of central force motion, described through two
More informationAS3010: Introduction to Space Technology
AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology L E C T U R E S 8-9 Part B, Lectures 8-9 23 March, 2017 C O N T E N T S In this lecture, we will look at factors that cause an orbit to change over time orbital
More informationAN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT
AAS 16-366 AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Jason A. Reiter * and David B. Spencer INTRODUCTION Collision avoidance maneuvers to prevent orbital
More informationAstromechanics. 6. Changing Orbits
Astromechanics 6. Changing Orbits Once an orbit is established in the two body problem, it will remain the same size (semi major axis) and shape (eccentricity) in the original orbit plane. In order to
More informationInterplanetary Mission Opportunities
Interplanetary Mission Opportunities Introduction The quest for unravelling the mysteries of the universe is as old as human history. With the advent of new space technologies, exploration of space became
More informationCelestial Mechanics Lecture 10
Celestial Mechanics Lecture 10 ˆ This is the first of two topics which I have added to the curriculum for this term. ˆ We have a surprizing amount of firepower at our disposal to analyze some basic problems
More information1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded
Code No: R05322106 Set No. 1 1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded rocket nozzles. (b) While on its way into orbit a space shuttle with an initial mass
More informationLow-Thrust Trajectories to the Moon
3rd WSEAS International Conference on APPLIED and THEORETICAL MECHANICS, Spain, December 14-16, 7 257 Low-Thrust Trajectories to the Moon ANTONIO F. B. A. PRADO Space Mechanics and Control Division INPE
More informationRelative Spiral Trajectories for Low-Thrust Formation Flying
Relative Spiral Trajectories for Low-Thrust Formation Flying By Matthew Willis 1) and Simone D Amico 2) 1) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, USA 2) Department of Aeronautics and
More informationUlrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition
Ulrich Walter Astronautics The Physics of Space Flight 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition Preface to Second Edition Preface XVII Acknowledgments XIX List of Symbols XXI XV 1 Rocket Fundamentals 1 1.1 Rocket
More informationGeosynchronous patrol orbit for space situational awareness
Geosynchronous patrol orbit for space situational awareness Blair Thompson, Thomas Kelecy, Thomas Kubancik Applied Defense Solutions Tim Flora, Michael Chylla, Debra Rose Sierra Nevada Corporation ABSTRACT
More informationLecture 1d: Satellite Orbits
Lecture 1d: Satellite Orbits Outline 1. Newton s Laws of Motion 2. Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation 3. Kepler s Laws 4. Putting Newton and Kepler s Laws together and applying them to the Earth-satellite
More informationFrom the Earth to the Moon: the weak stability boundary and invariant manifolds -
From the Earth to the Moon: the weak stability boundary and invariant manifolds - Priscilla A. Sousa Silva MAiA-UB - - - Seminari Informal de Matemàtiques de Barcelona 05-06-2012 P.A. Sousa Silva (MAiA-UB)
More informationPowered Space Flight
Powered Space Flight KOIZUMI Hiroyuki ( 小泉宏之 ) Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, Department of Advanced Energy & Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics ( 基盤科学研究系先端エネルギー工学専攻, 工学系航空宇宙工学専攻兼担 ) Scope
More informationCOUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES
COUPLED OPTIMIZATION OF LAUNCHER AND ALL-ELECTRIC SATELLITE TRAJECTORIES M. Verlet (1), B. Slama (1), S. Reynaud (1), and M. Cerf (1) (1) Airbus Defence and Space, 66 Route de Verneuil, 78133 Les Mureaux,
More informationExperimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations
Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations Aman Saluja #1, Manish Bansal #2, M Raja #3, Mohd Maaz #4 #Aerospace Department, University of Petroleum and Energy
More informationAS3010: Introduction to Space Technology
AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology L E C T U R E 6 Part B, Lecture 6 17 March, 2017 C O N T E N T S In this lecture, we will look at various existing satellite tracking techniques. Recall that we
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 4. The Orbit in Time Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: The Orbit in Space 3.1 INERTIAL FRAMES 3.4.1 ICRS 3.4.2 ICRF 3.2 COORDINATE SYSTEMS
More informationIMPROVED DESIGN OF ON-ORBIT SEPARATION SCHEMES FOR FORMATION INITIALIZATION BASED ON J 2 PERTURBATION
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS- IMPROVED DESIGN OF ON-ORBIT SEPARATION SCHEMES FOR FORMATION INITIALIZATION BASED ON J PERTURBATION Jiang Chao, * Wang Zhaokui, and Zhang Yulin INTRODUCTION Using one Multi-satellite Deployment
More informationMath Review Night: Work and the Dot Product
Math Review Night: Work and the Dot Product Dot Product A scalar quantity Magnitude: A B = A B cosθ The dot product can be positive, zero, or negative Two types of projections: the dot product is the parallel
More informationSTUDY OF THE NONIMPULSIVE ORBITAL MANEUVERS FEASIBILITY THROUGH THE FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF THE THRUSTER POWER
INPE-11300-PRE/6737 STUDY OF THE NONIMPULSIVE ORBITAL MANEUVERS FEASIBILITY THROUGH THE FUEL CONSUMPTION AND OF THE THRUSTER POWER Antônio Delson C. de Jesus* Fredson Braz Matos dos Santos Marcelo Lopes
More informationMAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.
MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30. Guidelines: Please turn in a neat and clean homework that gives all the formulae that you have used as well as details that
More informationAstrodynamics (AERO0024)
Astrodynamics (AERO0024) 4. The Orbit in Time Gaëtan Kerschen Space Structures & Systems Lab (S3L) Previous Lecture: The Orbit in Space 3.1 INERTIAL FRAMES 3.4.1 ICRS 3.4.2 ICRF 3.2 COORDINATE SYSTEMS
More informationFlight and Orbital Mechanics
Flight and Orbital Mechanics Lecture slides Challenge the future 1 Flight and Orbital Mechanics AE-104, lecture hours 1-4: Interplanetary flight Ron Noomen October 5, 01 AE104 Flight and Orbital Mechanics
More informationList of Tables. Table 3.1 Determination efficiency for circular orbits - Sample problem 1 41
List of Tables Table 3.1 Determination efficiency for circular orbits - Sample problem 1 41 Table 3.2 Determination efficiency for elliptical orbits Sample problem 2 42 Table 3.3 Determination efficiency
More informationOrbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez Orbit Design Requirements The following Science Requirements provided drivers for Orbit Design: Global Coverage: the entire extent (100%) of the ice-free ocean surface to at
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE The launch performance given in this chapter is based on the following assumptions: The LV system parameters being all nominal values; Mass of the LV adapter and the separation system are included
More informationIn the previous lecture, we discussed the basics of circular orbits. Mastering even circular orbits
In the previous lecture, we discussed the basics of circular orbits. Mastering even circular orbits provides quite a bit of intuitive behavior about the motion of spacecraft about planets. We learned that
More informationCHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE 3.1 Introduction The LM-3B performance figures given in this chapter are based on the following assumptions: Launching from XSLC (Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Sichuan Province, China),
More informationSatellite meteorology
GPHS 422 Satellite meteorology GPHS 422 Satellite meteorology Lecture 1 6 July 2012 Course outline 2012 2 Course outline 2012 - continued 10:00 to 12:00 3 Course outline 2012 - continued 4 Some reading
More informationStudy of LEO to GEO transfers via the L1 Sun-Earth or Earth-Moon libration points
Study of LEO to GEO transfers via the L1 Sun-Earth or Earth-Moon libration points Author: Elisabet Herrera Sucarrat Advisor: Josep Masdemont Soler Projecte Final de Màster d'enginyeria Matemàtica Facultat
More informationMinimum Energy Trajectories for Techsat 21 Earth Orbiting Clusters
Minimum Energy Trajectories for Techsat 1 Earth Orbiting Clusters Edmund M. C. Kong SSL Graduate Research Assistant Prof David W. Miller Director, MIT Space Systems Lab Space 1 Conference & Exposition
More informationExpanding opportunities for lunar gravity capture
Expanding opportunities for lunar gravity capture Keita Tanaka 1, Mutsuko Morimoto 2, Michihiro Matsumoto 1, Junichiro Kawaguchi 3, 1 The University of Tokyo, Japan, 2 JSPEC/JAXA, Japan, 3 ISAS/JAXA, Japan,
More informationIAC-16.A Jason A. Reiter a *, David B. Spencer b
IAC-16.A6.7.5 Trading Spacecraft Propellant Use and Mission Performance to Determine the Optimal Collision Probability in Emergency Collision Avoidance Scenarios Jason A. Reiter a *, David B. Spencer b
More informationIntroduction to Satellite Orbits
Introduction to Satellite Orbits Dinesh Manandhar Center for Spatial Information Science The University of Tokyo Contact Information: dinesh@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp Slide : 1 Basics of Satellite Orbits The speed
More informationOptimization of Orbital Transfer of Electrodynamic Tether Satellite by Nonlinear Programming
Optimization of Orbital Transfer of Electrodynamic Tether Satellite by Nonlinear Programming IEPC-2015-299 /ISTS-2015-b-299 Presented at Joint Conference of 30th International Symposium on Space Technology
More informationRobotic Mobility Above the Surface
Free Space Relative Orbital Motion Airless Major Bodies (moons) 1 2016 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Propulsive Motion in Free Space Basic motion governed by Newton
More informationMULTIPLE SPACE DEBRIS COLLECTING MISSION OPTIMAL MISSION PLANNING. Max CERF. AIRBUS Defence and Space Les Mureaux, France
MULTIPLE SPACE DEBRIS COLLECTING MISSION OPTIMAL MISSION PLANNING Max CERF AIRBUS Defence and Space 78130 Les Mureaux, France max.cerf@astrium.eads.net ABSTRACT In order to keep a safe access to space
More informationOn Sun-Synchronous Orbits and Associated Constellations
On Sun-Synchronous Orbits and Associated Constellations Daniele Mortari, Matthew P. Wilkins, and Christian Bruccoleri Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843,
More informationLaunch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm
Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm VAdimurthy, R V Ramanan, S R Tandon and C Ravikumar Aeronautics Entity, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre,
More informationANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS
ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS A1.1. Kepler s laws Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) discovered the laws of orbital motion, now called Kepler's laws.
More informationOrbit Determination of Satellite Formations. Terry Alfriend 9 th US Russian Space Surveillance Workshop
Orbit Determination of Satellite Formations Terry Alfriend 9 th US Russian Space Surveillance Workshop Outline What is a Satellite Formation Types of Formations Proposed Approach for Orbit Determination
More informationAssignment-I and Its Solution
Assignment-I and Its Solution Instructions i. Multiple choices of each questions are marked as A to D. One of the choices is unambiguously correct. Choose the most appropriate one amongst the given choices.
More informationAPPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING
APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF ORBITAL MECHANICS RELEVANT TO REMOTE SENSING Orbit selection and sensor characteristics are closely related to the strategy required to achieve the desired results. Different types
More information