DT-OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR PROBIT MODELS IN CLINICAL TRIALS
|
|
- Deborah Thomas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DT-OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR PROBIT MODELS IN CLINICAL TRIALS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Andrew Michael Lexvold In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Statistics May 2015 Fargo, North Dakota i
2 North Dakota State University Graduate School Title DT-Optimal Designs for Probit Models in Clinical Trials By Andrew Michael Lexvold The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Seung Won Hyun Chair Dr. Wonwoo Byun Dr. Gang Shen Approved: 08/06/2015 Dr. Rhonda Magel Date Department Chair ii
3 ABSTRACT The Optimal designs used in a clinical trial depends on the goals of the study. Common goals are estimating model parameters and choosing between models. D-optimal designs are used when the goal is to estimate the model parameters. This is achieved by maximizing the determinant of the information matrix. When the goal is model discrimination, T-optimal designs are used. The design is optimal when the minimum difference between the models is maximized. Generally, D- optimal designs are not efficient when the goal is model discrimination and T-optimal designs perform poorly when the goal is parameter estimation. However, because D-optimal and T-optimal designs have a common criterion structure, they can be combined into a new design called a DToptimal design. DT-optimal designs provide a balance between parameter estimation and model discrimination. The efficiency of DT-optimal designs relative to D and T-optimal designs shows that they work for parameter estimation and model discrimination. efficiency. Keywords: Experimental design; Dose-response; Dual objective optimal design, iii
4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Wonwoo Byun, Dr. Gang Shen, and especially my advisor, Dr. Seung Won Hyun, for all of his assistance and encouragement while working on my thesis. Without his continued support I might have never finished. I also want to thank my parents and undergraduate professors. They encouraged me to pursue a graduate degree and I wouldn t be in this position without them. iv
5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... iv LIST OF TABLES.vi LIST OF FIGURES...vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND Dose-response Studies T-optimal Designs D-optimal Designs....7 CHAPTER 3. DT-OPTIMAL DESIGNS DT-optimality Algorithm to Find Optimal Design... 9 CHAPTER 4. DESIGN RESULTS Competing Models Nominal Parameter Values and Dose Range T-optimal Designs D-optimal Designs DT-optimal Designs CHAPTER 5. EFFICIENCY.18 CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSIONS 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY.21 APPENDIX. R CODE...23 v
6 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 4.1. Parameter sets for η 1 and estimates for η Efficiency for parameter set Efficiency for parameter set Efficiency for parameter set vi
7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1. Strong-downturn dose response Slight-downturn dose response No-downturn dose response The two competing models for the strong-downturn dose response The two competing models for the slight-downturn dose response The two competing models for the no-downturn dose response Optimality check for parameter set Optimality check for parameter set Optimality check for parameter set vii
8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Dose response studies are a common type of clinical trial used to determine the appropriate dose of a drug to give to patients. Patients are given a range of dose levels that help explain possible reactions to the drug in question. Nonmonotone dose-response functions are common and three types will be considered: strong-downturn, slight-downturn, and no-downturn. The functions will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 2. For drugs that exhibit a downturn in the dose-response, a common question among researches is whether this downturn is significant or not. To assess this significance two competing models can be estimated. One model describing the full doseresponse function with a downturn, and one that only describes the increasing component of the function. In order to describe these functions, parameters must be estimated. This is done using an experimental design. Designs consist of design points (dose levels) and weights (subject allocations). In order for the experiment to be efficient, the optimal design must be used. Because there are many different objectives possible when conducting clinical trials, there are also many types of optimal designs. Here we consider T-optimal designs, D-optimal designs, and their combination, DT-optimal designs. Welshons et al. (2003) gives motivation for studying dose-response functions with a downturn and contains useful information on obtaining optimal designs, such as nominal parameter values and the dose range. A Probit model will be used to describe the dose-response functions because it can easily describe the downturn by adding a quadratic term and it provides a good fit to Welshons data, see Hyun (2013). We use T-optimal designs for discrimination between the rival two and three parameter models. In other words, we can use T-optimal designs to choose the most appropriate model. Atkinson and Fedorov (1975a,b) show that T-optimality 1
9 criterion maximizes the minimum difference between the two competing models, which in turn gives more power to an F-test of lack of fit, assuming the first model is true. More information about and uses of T-optimal designs can be found in Ucinski and Bogacka (2005), Wiens (2009), Tommasi and L opez-fidalgo (2010), Atkinson, Bogacka and Bogachi (1998), and Foo and Duffull (2011). D-optimal designs are used when the goal of the study is accurate parameter estimation. Box and Lucas (1959) show that D-optimal designs maximize the determinant of the Fisher Information Matrix. In some sense, this can be thought of as minimizing the variance of the parameter estimates. There have been many attempts at seeking a balance between model discrimination and parameter estimation. Hill et al. (1968) gives motivation for why researches might be interested in a single design for both goals. Instead of having a design for one stage of the experiment where the goal is to find a good model, and a completely separate design for the next stage where model parameters are to be estimated, they suggest that a design to do both at the same time would allow researchers to combine the two stages. This would save both time and precious resources. Most importantly the overall number of subjects for the study would be decreased. Waterhouse et al. (2005) has a practical situation where researchers might actually need to discriminate between models and estimate parameters. They are researching optimal sampling times for subjects with cystic fibrosis. In their study, they need not only to discriminate between two linear and two nonlinear models, but also estimate the model parameters in order to determine the optimal sampling times. DT-optimal designs, introduced by Atkinson (2008) as a way to balance model discrimination and parameter estimation, are found by simply maximizing a weighted product of T-efficiency and D-efficiency. This represents relative importance of the two objectives. More 2
10 details will be given in Chapter 3. A design is considered to be an optimal design when it satisfies a certain optimality criterion, and it is verified by the General Equivalence Theorem in Kiefer (1974). The paper also has background on equivalency theorems in general if more information is desired. In Chapter 2, more information about dose-response functions is given, as well as background on D-optimal and T-optimal designs. DT-optimal designs and the DT-optimal equivalence theorem are discussed in detail in Chapter 3. Efficiency calculations are shown in Chapter 4 for D-optimal, T-optimal, and DT-optimal designs. Chapter 5 contains concluding remarks as well as potential further research. 3
11 CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND 2.1. Dose-response Studies Plotting the logarithm of dose on the X-axis and the drug response on the Y-axis can result in a variety of shapes. Three of those shapes are under consideration here. The first is called a strong-downturn function. This function resembles a concave parabola. The second is called a slight-downturn function. Also resembling a concave parabola, this function is flatter than a strong-downturn dose-response function. The third is called a no-downturn function and resembles a Sigmoid S curve. Figure 2.1. Strong-downturn dose response 4
12 Figure 2.2. Slight-downturn dose response Figure 2.3. No-downturn dose response 5
13 2.2. T-optimal Designs In some studies, researches may have a hard time deciding between competing plausible models. In these cases, designs that are efficient at model discrimination are useful because they can help select the most appropriate model using the least effort and resources. Atkinson and Fedorov (1975) consider designs for discrimination between two rival regression models η 1 (x, Θ 1 ) and η 2 (x, Θ 2 ), whose forms are given in Section 4.1. The model parameters are estimated by least squares. If it is assumed that the first model is true, then y ij = η 1 (x i, Θ 1 ) + ε ij, ε ij ~ N(0, σ 2 ), (2.1) where y ij is continuous and represents a dose response, j = 1, 2, 3,..., n i, i = 1, 2, 3,..., k, n i is the number of subjects allocated to x i, and Θ 1 = {θ 11, θ 12,, θ 1p }is the vector of model parameters. The values of x i are selected for a dose range X. Finally, the sample size, N = k i=1 n i. Let ξ = {x i, w i } k denote k design points (dose levels), where x i is the i th log dose and w i is the corresponding weight at x i. Here x i εx and the nearest positive inter of N w i is the number of subjects assigned to x i. The lack of fit sum of squares for model η 2 (x, Θ 2 ) is made as large as possible by maximizing k 1 (ξ) = w i {η 1 (x i, Θ 1 ) η 2 (x i, Θ 2)} 2 i=1, (2.2) where Θ 2 are the calculated parameters of η 2 that minimize its distance from η 1 and 1 (ξ) is called the objective function of a design ξ. Note that the values of x i and w i are found using the algorithm in Section 3.2. The values of Θ 1 come from previous research and can be seen below in Table 4.1. The design maximizing (2.2) is called T-optimal design, it is denoted as ξ T. 6
14 following, where Atkinson and Fedorov (1975) give the Equivalence Theorem for T-optimal designs as the Ψ 1 (x, ξ T ) 1 (ξ T ), (2.3) Ψ 1 (x, ξ T ) = {η 1 (x i, Θ 1 ) η 2 (x i, Θ 2)} 2. Equality in (2.3) holds at the design points of the T-optimal design D-optimal Designs When the goal of the study is parameter estimation, D-optimal designs are most commonly used. As mention earlier, D-optimal designs maximize the determinant of the Fisher Information Matrix. Under (2.1), the Fisher Information matrix can be written as where W = diag{w i } and M 1 (ξ) = F 1 T WF 1, (2.4) F 1 (x, Θ 1 ) = { δη 1 (x 1,Θ 1 ) δθ 1, δη 1 (x 2,Θ 1 ) δθ 1,, δη 1 (x k,θ 1 ) δθ 1 } p k, (2.5) δη 1 (x i,θ 1 ) = { δη 1 (x i,θ 1 ), δη 1 (x i,θ 1 ),, δη 1 (x T i,θ 1 ) }. δθ 1 δθ 11 δθ 12 δθ 1p The D-optimal design ξ D maximizes M 1 (ξ). Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1960) give the equivalence theorem for D-optimal designs as where p is the number of parameters in the first model and Ψ 2 (x, ξ D ) p, (2.7) Ψ 2 (x, ξ D ) = f 1 T (x)m 1 1 (ξ D )f 1 (x), f 1 (x, Θ 1 ) = δη 1 (x 1,Θ 1 ) δθ 1. Similarly to T-optimality, equality in (2.7) holds at the design points of the D-optimal design. 7
15 CHAPTER 3. DT-OPTIMAL DESIGNS 3.1. DT-optimality The DT-optimal optimality criterion is a weighted product of the efficiencies of T-optimal and D-optimal designs. The DT-optimal design maximizes the efficiencies for model discrimination (T-optimal design) and parameter estimation (D-optimal design). According to Atkinson (2008), the efficiency of any design ξ relative to the T-optimal design ξ T is called T- efficiency: E T = 1 (ξ)/ 1 (ξ T ). (3.1) In other words, it is the ratio of the objective function for the design in question to the optimal design. D-efficiency is E D = { M 1 (ξ) / M 1 (ξ D ) } (1/p). (3.2) If we denote the efficiency of a design ξ as E(ξ), we can calculate how many more subjects a researcher would need to have the same accuracy as the optimal design using the formula π = 100 ( 1 1) %. (3.3) E(ξ) For example, E(ξ) = 0.5 implies a study would 100% or twice as many subjects to be just as accurate as the optimal design. To find a DT-optimal design we maximize the weighted product of (3.1) and (3.2). {E f T } (1 λ) {E f D } λ = { 1 (ξ)/ 1 (ξ T )} (1 λ) { M 1 (ξ) / M 1 (ξ D ) } λ/p, (0 λ 1). (3.4) If λ = 0 (3.4) becomes T-efficiency and if λ = 1 (3.4) becomes D-efficiency. We can simplify (3.4) by first taking the log, (1 λ)log 1 (ξ) + (λ/p)log M 1 (ξ) (1 λ)log 1 (ξ T ) (λ/p)log M 1 (ξ D ) (3.5) 8
16 then removing the terms involving the optimal designs ξ D and ξ T because they are constant when we maximize (3.4) over ξ, to find Φ 1 DT (ξ) = (1 λ)log 1 (ξ) + (λ/p)log M 1 (ξ). (3.6) The design maximizing (3.5) is called DT-optimal and is denoted ξ DT. Here λ is the relative importance of the D-optimality criterion compared to the T-optimality criterion. When λ = 1 the design maximizing (3.5) is the D-optimal design, and when λ = 0 the design maximizing (3.5) is the T-optimal design. where Ψ DT (x, ξ DT The equivalence theorem for DT-optimality design (Atkinson 2008) states that ) = (1 λ)ψ 1 (x, ξ DT Ψ DT (x, ξ DT ) 1, (3.7) )/ 1 (ξ DT ) + (λ/p)ψ 2 (x, ξ DT ) = (1 λ){η 1 (x i, Θ 1 ) η 2 (x i, Θ 2)} 2 / 1 (ξ DT ) + (λ/p)f T 1 (x)m 1 1 (ξ DT )f 1 (x). Similarly to both the T-optimal and D-optimal equivalence theorems equality in (3.6) holds at the design points of the DT-optimal design Algorithm to Find Optimal Design We can find the DT-optimal design numerically using the well-known V-algorithm (Fedorov 1972). Step 0: Set an initial design ξ 0 with design points x 1,0, x 2,0,, x k,0 and uniform weights w 1,0, w 2,0,, w k,0 = 1/k Step 1: Obtain Θ 2,s : k Θ 2,s = arg min w i,s (η 1 (x i,s, Θ 1,s ) η 2 (x i,s, Θ 2,s )) 2 Θ 2,s Θ S i=1. 9
17 Step 2: Find the design point x s = arg max (1 λ)log k w x i,s (η 1 (x i,s, Θ 1,s ) η 2 (x i,s, Θ 2,s )) 2 i=1 s X +(λ/p)log f 1 T (x i,s )M 1 1 (ξ s )f 1 (x i,s ). Step 3: Stop the algorithm if Ψ DT (x s, ξ DT ) 1 ε, 10 8 ε When the algorithm stops ξ s is the DT-optimal design. Step 4: Otherwise, update the design Step 5: Set s = s + 1 and repeat Steps 1 5. ξ s+1 = (1 1 s+1 ) ξ s + ξ new, ξ new = { x s 1 s+1 }. 10
18 CHAPTER 4. DESIGN RESULTS 4.1. Competing Models Two probit models are considered. The first has three parameters and includes a quadratic term. The second model only has two parameters and does not include a quadratic term. The two models are η 1 (x, Θ 1 ) = Φ( (θ 11 + θ 12 x i + θ 13 x 2 i )), (4.1) η 2 (x, Θ 2 ) = Φ( (θ 21 + θ 22 x i )). (4.2) Φ is the cumulative standard normal distribution. The Fisher Information matrix for η 1 (x, Θ 1 ) is k w i i=1 k x i w i i=1 k x 2 i w i [ i=1 e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) k x i w i i=1 k x i 2 w i i=1 k x i 3 w i i=1 e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) k x i 2 w i i=1 k x i 3 w i i=1 k x i 4 w i i=1 e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) e ( (θ 11+x i θ 12 +x i 2 θ 12 ) 2 ) ] (4.3) 4.2. Nominal Parameter Values and Dose Range In order to illustrate the 3 types of response functions, three sets of nominal parameter values and the log dose range were adopted from Ming (2014). Estimates for the two parameter model provide a minimum distance from η 1 (x, Θ 1 ). They are the values last used to find the minimum distance when the algorithm detailed above stops. Welshons et al. (2003) gives motivation for using the design space [ 14, 4] and the initial parameter values for the probit model for the strong-downturn dose response function. 11
19 Table 4.1. Parameter sets for η 1 and estimates for η 2 θ 11 θ 12 θ 13 θ 21 θ 22 Strong-downturn Slight-downturn No-downturn The following plots show the two competing models for each dose-response function. Figure 4.1. The two competing models for the strong-downturn dose response 12
20 Figure 4.2. The two competing models for the slight-downturn dose response Figure 4.3. The two competing models for the no-downturn dose response 13
21 4.3. T-optimal designs Recall T-optimal designs maximizing the minimum difference between the competing models. The T-optimal designs are: For the Strong-downturn dose response function For the Slight-downturn dose response function For the No-downturn dose response function ξ T = { }, (4.4) ξ T = { }, (4.5) ξ T = { }, (4.6) Consider a drug with a strong-downturn dose response. In this scenario we would assign 25% of the subjects to each log dose boundary and 50% of the subjects to the log dose level -9. This would allow us to most accurately maximize the distance between the two models. Also notice the similarity between (4.4) and (4.5). The design points are essentially identical, and the subjects for the slight-downturn dose response are just a little more evenly distributed with different weights. The T-optimal design for the no-downturn dose response is substantially different. There are only two design points. This will be a problem when trying to estimate model parameters because we need at least as many design points as there are model parameters in order to find estimates. The magnitude of the problem will be quantified when we calculate this design s D-efficiency D-optimal designs Recall D-optimal designs maximizing the determinant of the Fisher Information matrix. The D-optimal designs are: 14
22 For the Strong-downturn dose response function ξ D = { }, (4.7) 0.33 For the Slight-downturn dose response function For the No-downturn dose response function ξ D = { }, (4.8) ξ D = { }, (4.9) All three dose response functions have unique D-optimal designs. There are still similarities however. In (4.7) there are four design point while in (4.8) there are only three. However notice that the boundaries are similar and that (4.7) s middle two design points are basically a split in both log dose and weight of the middle design point of (4.8). It is also worth noticing that both (4.8) and (4.9) have essentially uniform weights. This is a typical trait of D- optimal designs when the number of model parameters is equal to the number of design points. To understand how to use a D-optimal design consider (4.9). If our drug exhibits a no-downturn dose response we would allocate and equal amount of subjects to the log dose levels -11.1, -9.6, and -8. This would allow researchers to most accurately estimate the models parameters DT-optimal designs Recall DT-optimal designs maximizing the weighted product of D-efficiency and T- efficiency. The DT-optimal designs are: For the Strong-downturn dose response function ξ DT = { }, (4.10)
23 Figure 4.4. Optimality check for parameter set 1 For the Slight-downturn dose response function = { }, (4.11) ξ DT Figure 4.5. Optimality check for parameter set 2 16
24 For the No-downturn dose response function ξ DT = { }, (4.12) Figure 4.6. Optimality check for parameter set 3 This time consider a drug with a slight-downturn dose response. (4.11) tells us that approximately 30% of the subjects should go to the boundary log dose values, and that 40% of the subjects should be given a log dose value of With this we could provide a good balance between model discrimination and parameter estimation. The figure following each designs is a visual way to check if the design is really optimal. According to (3.7), at the design points of the DT-optimal design, Ψ DT (x, ξ DT ) = 1. Sticking with the slight downturn dose response example, we can see that this is the case. Ψ DT (x, ξ DT ) = 1 at x = 14, 9.3, and 4. It is also worth noting that the DT-optimal designs for strong-downturn and slight-downturn dose response functions are very similar to the T-optimal designs. However for a no-downturn dose response function the DT-optimal design is more similar to the D-optimal design. 17
25 CHAPTER 5. EFFICIENCY Efficiency is used to compare a given design to the optimal design. Recall (3.1) and (3.2) for calculating T-efficiency and D-efficiency. Using these we can calculate the efficiency of the DT-optimal design relative to the T-optimal and D-optimal designs for each parameter set. For the strong-downturn dose-response function: Table 5.1. Efficiency for parameter set 1 E T (ξ) E D (ξ) ξ T ξ D ξ DT Here we can see that the T-optimal design is only about 80% efficient at parameter estimation. This means the about 25% more subjects would be required to reach the same accuracy as the D-optimal designs, according to (3.3). However the D-optimal design preforms even worse at model discrimination. As stated before, an efficiency of 50% means that twice as many subjects would be needed to be as accurate as the T-optimal design. The DT-optimal design preforms much better in both cases. With a T-efficiency of 95% only about 6% more subjects would be needed to reach the same accuracy as the T-optimal design. Also a D-efficiency of 85% means about 18% more subjects would be required to be just as accurate as the D-optimal design at parameter estimation. 18
26 Table 5.2. Efficiency for parameter set 2 E T (ξ) E D (ξ) ξ T ξ D ξ DT For the slight-downturn dose response we can see that all three optimal designs are fairly efficient. Looking back at (4.5), (4.8), and (4.11), we can see that all three designs are pretty similar, so the high efficiencies aren t surprising. However DT-optimal designs are still slightly better if both parameter estimation and model discrimination are important. Table 5.3. Efficiency for parameter set 3 E T (ξ) E D (ξ) ξ T ξ D ξ DT When we consider the no-downturn dose response function T-optimal designs are very inefficient at parameter estimation. At 14% D-efficiency, about 615% more subjects would be needed to accurately estimate model parameters. The reason this design is so bad at parameter estimation is because there are only two design points, while the model has three parameters. The T-efficiency of the D-optimal design is 65%. About 54% more subjects would be needed to be as accurate at model discrimination as the T-optimal design. The DT-optimal design has a T- efficiency of 83% and a D-efficiency of 92%. 21% and 9% more subjects would be needed to reach the same accuracy as the T-optimal and D-optimal designs, respectively. 19
27 CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSIONS The DT-optimal design for the strong-downturn dose response function was very similar to the T-optimal design. For the slight-downturn dose response function all three designs were similar, only the weights for the D-optimal design were different. The DT-optimal and D-optimal designs were nearly the same for the no-downturn dose response. Overall DT-optimal designs perform well for both model discrimination and parameter estimation for all three dose response functions. For the strong-downturn and no-downturn dose-response functions D-optimality performs poorly when the objective is model discrimination and T-optimality performs poorly for parameter estimation, as expected. Despite some similarities in the designs, it is best to use the DT-optimal design in all cases if the study has goals to choose a model and estimate parameters. DT-optimal designs will always be at least slightly more efficient at model discrimination than D-optimal designs, and more efficient at parameter estimation than T-optimal designs. Future research in this area could include studying DT-optimal designs for different values of λ to see the relationship between λ and the efficiencies. Also, because the DT-optimal design relies on the nominal parameter values, studying how DT-optimal designs change when the parameter values are specified incorrectly would be an interesting research question. Finally another extension could be simulating actual data to use with these designs. This would allow a better picture of how well DT-optimal designs preform at both tasks. 20
28 BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] Atkinson, A. C. and Fedorov, V. V. (1975a). The design of experiments for discriminating between two rival models. Biometrika 62, 57C70. [2] Atkinson, A. C. and Fedorov, V. V. (1975b). Optimal design: Experiments for discriminating between several models. Biometrika 62, 289C303. [3] Atkinson, A. C., Bogacka, B. and Bogachi, M. B. (1998). D- and T-optimum designs for the kinetics of a reversible chemical reaction. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 43, [4] Atkinson, A.C., (2008). DT-optimum designs for model discrimination and parameter estimation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138, [5] Box, G.E.P., Lucas, H.L., (1959). Design of experiments in nonlinear situations. Biometrika 46, [6] Biswas, A., Chaudhuri, P., An efficient design for model discrimination and parameter estimation. Biometrika 89, [7] Foo, L. K. and Duffull, S. (2011). Optimal design of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies. Pharmacokinetics in Drug Development: Advances and Applications 3, [8] Fedorov, V. V. (1971). Asymptotically optimal designs of experiments for discriminating two rival regression models. Theory of Probability and Its Applications 16, [9] Fedorov V.V. (1972). Theory of optimal experiments. Academic Press. New York. [10] Hill, W.J., Hunter, W.G., Wichern, W.D., (1968). A joint design criterion for the dual problem of model discrimination and parameter estimation. Technometrics 10, [11] Hyun, S.W (2013): Optimal Designs for a Probit Model With a Quadratic Term, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 5:1, [12] Kiefer, J.,Wolfowitz, J., (1960). The equivalence of two extremum problems. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 12, [13] Kiefer, J. (1974). General equivalence theory for optimum designs. Annals of Statistics 2, 849C879. [14] Stigler, S. (1971). Optimal experimental design for polynomial regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 311C318. [15] Ming, Y. (2014). T-Optimal Designs for Model Discrimination in Probit Models. North Dakota State University. Master s Thesis. 21
29 [16] Studden,W. J. (1982). Some robust-type D-optimal designs in polynomial regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 916C921. MR [17] Tommasi, C. and L opez-fidalgo, J. (2010). T-optimum designs for discrimination between two multiresponse dynamic models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 67, [18] Ucinski, D. and Bogacka, B. (2005). Bayesian optimum designs for discriminating between models with any distribution. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54, 143C150. [19] Waterhouse, T.H., Eccleston, J.A., Duffull, S.B., (2004). On optimal design for discrimination and estimation. In: Antoch, J. (Ed.), COMPSTAT 2004: Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp [20] Waterhouse, T.H., Eccleston, J.A., Duffull, S.B., (2005). Optimal design for model discrimination and parameter estimation for itraconazole population pharmocokinetics in cystic fibrosis patients. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 32, [21] Welshons, W. V., Thayer, K. A., Judy, B. M., Taylor, J. A., Curran, E. M., and Saal, F. S. (2003). Large Effects From Small Exposures. I. Mechanisms for Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Estrogenic Activity. Environmental Health Perspectives 111, [22] Wiens, D. P. (2009). Robust discrimination designs, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 71,
30 APPENDIX. R CODE #Estimated Model 2 parameters' range: #theta1 [-10,0] #theta2 [-0.01, -1] #True model with Theta1: #theta1 = 4.63 theta1 = theta1 = #theta2 = 1.23 theta2 = theta2 = #theta3 = 0.07 theta3 = theta3 = 0.01 #Initial value# x0 = c(-14, -10, -6, -4) n0 = length(x0) w = rep(1/n0, n0) (D = rbind(x0, w)) p = 1 n = 1 #define M #number of parameter k=3 #value of parameter (change to one of sets above; also change values in the loop) alpha=-6.69 beta=-.6 gamma=.01 23
31 #define function f<-function(x) {matrix(c(exp((-1/2)*(gamma*(x^2)+beta*x+alpha)^2), x*exp((-1/2)*(gamma*(x^2)+beta*x+alpha)^2), (x^2)*exp((- 1/2)*(gamma*(x^2)+beta*x+alpha)^2)),nrow=3,ncol=1,byrow=F)} # define information matrix A1<-rep(0,n0) A2<-rep(0,n0) A3<-rep(0,n0) A4<-rep(0,n0) A5<-rep(0,n0) for (i in 1:n0) { A1[i]=w[i]*exp((-1)*(gamma*(x0[i]^2)+beta*x0[i]+alpha)^2) A2[i]=x0[i]*A1[i] A3[i]=x0[i]^2*A1[i] A4[i]=x0[i]^3*A1[i] A5[i]=x0[i]^4*A1[i] } M0=matrix(c(sum(A1),sum(A2),sum(A3),sum(A2),sum(A3), sum(a4),sum(a3),sum(a4),sum(a5)),nrow=3,ncol=3,byrow=f) 24
32 while(p >.0001){ Rt1 = c(-5, 5) Rt2 = c(-1, 1) s = c(1,.1) while(max(s) >.01){ theta1 = seq(rt1[1], Rt1[2], s[1]) theta2 = seq(rt2[1], Rt2[2], s[2]) eta1 = function(x) {pnorm(-( *x *x^2))} mod2 = expand.grid(theta1, theta2) diff = rep(na, nrow(mod2)) for (i in 1:nrow(mod2)){ diff[i] = sum(w*(sapply(x0, eta1) - pnorm(-(mod2[i,1] + mod2[i,2]*x0)))^2) } (theta1hat = mod2[which.min(diff),1]); (theta2hat = mod2[ which.min(diff),2]) s = s/2 Rt1[1] = theta1hat - s[1] Rt1[2] = theta1hat + s[1] Rt2[1] = theta2hat - s[2] Rt2[2] = theta2hat + s[2] } theta1hat theta2hat x = seq(-14, -4,.1) a = rep(na, length(x)) diff2 = rep(na, length(x)) 25
33 for (j in 1:length(x)){ diff2[j] = (.5/(sum(w*(sapply(x0, eta1) - pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat*x0)))^2)))* (sapply(x[j], eta1) - pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat *x[j])))^2 + (.5/3)*(t(f(x[j]))%*%solve(M0)%*%f(x[j])) } (anew = x[which.max(diff2)]) p = abs(max(diff2)-1) x0 = c(x0,anew) alpha2 = 1/(n + 1) w = c((1 - alpha2) * w, alpha2) n = n + 1 n0 = length(x0) A1<-rep(0,n0) A2<-rep(0,n0) A3<-rep(0,n0) A4<-rep(0,n0) A5<-rep(0,n0) 26
34 for (i in 1:n0) { A1[i]=w[i]*exp((-1)*(gamma*(x0[i]^2)+beta*x0[i]+alpha)^2) A2[i]=x0[i]*A1[i] A3[i]=x0[i]^2*A1[i] A4[i]=x0[i]^3*A1[i] A5[i]=x0[i]^4*A1[i] } M0=matrix(c(sum(A1),sum(A2),sum(A3),sum(A2),sum(A3), sum(a4),sum(a3),sum(a4),sum(a5)),nrow=3,ncol=3,byrow=f) print(p) D = rbind(x0,w) } #Summarize the result DT_optimal = by(d[2,], D[1,], FUN = sum) DT_optimal #plot the two models theta1hat theta2hat y = pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat*x)) y1 = eta1(x) plot(x, y, cex = 0.3, ylim = c(0, 1), col = "blue", type="l",pch=1) lines(x, y1,type="l",pch=1) cont.txt=c(expression(eta1), expression(eta2)) legend("bottomright", legend=cont.txt, col=c(1,4), lwd=1, lty=c(1,1)) 27
35 #Verify DT-optimal X = D[1,] W = D[2,] x = seq(-14, -4,.1) ds = rep(0,length(x)) for (i in 1:length(x)) {ds[i] = (.5/(sum(w*(sapply(x0, eta1) - pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat*x0)))^2)))* (sapply(x[i], eta1) - pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat *x[i])))^2 + (.5/3)*(t(f(x[i]))%*%solve(M0)%*%f(x[i]))} cont.txt2 = (expression(psi)) plot(x, ds, cex = 0.3, type = "l", pch=1, ylab = cont.txt2, ylim = c( ,1)) abline(h = 1,pch =1, lty = 3) abline(v = c(-11.1, -9.5, -8.1), pch =1, lty = 3) #Calculating Efficiency #Obj function: sum(w*(sapply(x0, eta1) - pnorm(-(theta1hat + theta2hat*x0)))^2) #DetM0 det(m0) 28
36 ######### #THETA-1# ######### # T-optimal # x0 = c(-14, -9, -4) # w = c(0.25, 0.50, 0.25) # Obj = # DetM0 = # DT-optimal # x0 = c(-13.9, -9, -4) # w = c(0.28, 0.45, 0.27) # Obj = # DetM0 = # theta1hat = # theta2hat = # D-optimal # x0 = c(-13.2, -10.3, -7.2, -4.3) # w = c(0.32, 0.17, 18, 0.33) # Obj = # DetM0 = e-07 (Eff.DT.T = / ) # (Eff.DT.D = ( / )^(1/3)) # (Eff.T.D = ( / )^(1/3)) # (Eff.D.T = / ) #
37 ######### #THETA-2# ######### # T-optimal # x0 = c(-14, -9.2, -4) # w = c(0.27, 0.43, 0.30) # Obj = # DetM0 = # DT-optimal # x0 = c(-14, -9.3, -4) # w = c(0.30, 0.40, 0.30) # Obj = # DetM0 = # theta1hat = # theta2hat = # D-optimal # x0 = c(-13.7, -9.5, -4) # w = c(0.33, 0.33, 0.33) # Obj = # DetM0 = (Eff.DT.T = / ) # (Eff.DT.D = (543.74/ )^(1/3)) # (Eff.T.D = ( / )^(1/3)) # (Eff.D.T = / ) #
38 ######### #THETA-3# ######### # T-optimal # x0 = c(-11.1, -8.2) # w = c(0.43, 0.57) # Obj = # DetM0 = # DT-optimal # x0 = c(-11.1, -9.5, -8.1) # w = c(0.41, 0.18, 0.41) # Obj = # DetM0 = # theta1hat = # theta2hat = # D-optimal # x0 = c(-11.1, -9.6, -8) # w = c(0.34, 0.33, 0.33) # Obj = # DetM0 = (Eff.DT.T = / ) # (Eff.DT.D = ( / )^(1/3)) # (Eff.T.D = ( / )^(1/3)) # (Eff.D.T = / ) #
Optimum Designs for the Equality of Parameters in Enzyme Inhibition Kinetic Models
Optimum Designs for the Equality of Parameters in Enzyme Inhibition Kinetic Models Anthony C. Atkinson, Department of Statistics, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, UK and Barbara Bogacka, School
More informationAP-Optimum Designs for Minimizing the Average Variance and Probability-Based Optimality
AP-Optimum Designs for Minimizing the Average Variance and Probability-Based Optimality Authors: N. M. Kilany Faculty of Science, Menoufia University Menoufia, Egypt. (neveenkilany@hotmail.com) W. A. Hassanein
More informationOptimum designs for model. discrimination and estimation. in Binary Response Models
Optimum designs for model discrimination and estimation in Binary Response Models by Wei-Shan Hsieh Advisor Mong-Na Lo Huang Department of Applied Mathematics National Sun Yat-sen University Kaohsiung,
More informationEfficient computation of Bayesian optimal discriminating designs
Efficient computation of Bayesian optimal discriminating designs Holger Dette Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät für Mathematik 44780 Bochum, Germany e-mail: holger.dette@rub.de Roman Guchenko, Viatcheslav
More informationHeteroscedastic T-Optimum Designs for Multiresponse Dynamic Models
Heteroscedastic T-Optimum Designs for Multiresponse Dynamic Models Dariusz Uciński 1 and Barbara Bogacka 2 1 Institute of Control and Computation Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Podgórna 50,
More informationOptimal discrimination designs
Optimal discrimination designs Holger Dette Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät für Mathematik 44780 Bochum, Germany e-mail: holger.dette@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Stefanie Titoff Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät
More informationOn the efficiency of two-stage adaptive designs
On the efficiency of two-stage adaptive designs Björn Bornkamp (Novartis Pharma AG) Based on: Dette, H., Bornkamp, B. and Bretz F. (2010): On the efficiency of adaptive designs www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/sfb823-dp2010.html
More informationPOWER ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE IMPORTANCE OF COVARIANCE STRUCTURE CHOICE IN MIXED MODEL REPEATED MEASURES ANOVA
POWER ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE IMPORTANCE OF COVARIANCE STRUCTURE CHOICE IN MIXED MODEL REPEATED MEASURES ANOVA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture
More informationADAPTIVE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. Maciej Patan and Barbara Bogacka. University of Zielona Góra, Poland and Queen Mary, University of London
ADAPTIVE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR SIMULTANEOUS PK AND DOSE-SELECTION STUDIES IN PHASE I CLINICAL TRIALS Maciej Patan and Barbara Bogacka University of Zielona Góra, Poland and Queen Mary, University of
More informationEfficient algorithms for calculating optimal designs in pharmacokinetics and dose finding studies
Efficient algorithms for calculating optimal designs in pharmacokinetics and dose finding studies Tim Holland-Letz Ruhr-Universität Bochum Medizinische Fakultät 44780 Bochum, Germany email: tim.holland-letz@rub.de
More informationOn construction of constrained optimum designs
On construction of constrained optimum designs Institute of Control and Computation Engineering University of Zielona Góra, Poland DEMA2008, Cambridge, 15 August 2008 Numerical algorithms to construct
More informationOptimal Design for Nonlinear and Spatial Models: Introduction and Historical Overview
12 Optimal Design for Nonlinear and Spatial Models: Introduction and Historical Overview Douglas P. Wiens CONTENTS 12.1 Introduction...457 12.2 Generalized Linear Models...457 12.3 Selected Nonlinear Models...460
More informationStat 8053 Lecture Notes An Example that Shows that Statistical Obnoxiousness is not Related to Dimension Charles J. Geyer November 17, 2014
Stat 8053 Lecture Notes An Example that Shows that Statistical Obnoxiousness is not Related to Dimension Charles J. Geyer November 17, 2014 We are all familiar with the usual mathematics of maximum likelihood.
More informationRobust design in model-based analysis of longitudinal clinical data
Robust design in model-based analysis of longitudinal clinical data Giulia Lestini, Sebastian Ueckert, France Mentré IAME UMR 1137, INSERM, University Paris Diderot, France PODE, June 0 016 Context Optimal
More informationD-optimal Designs for Factorial Experiments under Generalized Linear Models
D-optimal Designs for Factorial Experiments under Generalized Linear Models Jie Yang Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science University of Illinois at Chicago Joint research with Abhyuday
More informationOptimal Designs for 2 k Experiments with Binary Response
1 / 57 Optimal Designs for 2 k Experiments with Binary Response Dibyen Majumdar Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science College of Liberal Arts and Sciences University of Illinois at Chicago Joint
More informationOptimal and efficient designs for Gompertz regression models
Ann Inst Stat Math (2012) 64:945 957 DOI 10.1007/s10463-011-0340-y Optimal and efficient designs for Gompertz regression models Gang Li Received: 13 July 2010 / Revised: 11 August 2011 / Published online:
More informationCompound Optimal Designs for Percentile Estimation in Dose-Response Models with Restricted Design Intervals
Compound Optimal Designs for Percentile Estimation in Dose-Response Models with Restricted Design Intervals Stefanie Biedermann 1, Holger Dette 1, Wei Zhu 2 Abstract In dose-response studies, the dose
More informationRandomisation, Replication, Response Surfaces. and. Rosemary
Randomisation, Replication, Response Surfaces and Rosemary 1 A.C. Atkinson a.c.atkinson@lse.ac.uk Department of Statistics London School of Economics London WC2A 2AE, UK One joint publication RAB AND ME
More informationPaper CD Erika Larsen and Timothy E. O Brien Loyola University Chicago
Abstract: Paper CD-02 2015 SAS Software as an Essential Tool in Statistical Consulting and Research Erika Larsen and Timothy E. O Brien Loyola University Chicago Modelling in bioassay often uses linear,
More informationOPTIMAL DESIGN INPUTS FOR EXPERIMENTAL CHAPTER 17. Organization of chapter in ISSO. Background. Linear models
CHAPTER 17 Slides for Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization (ISSO)by J. C. Spall OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR EXPERIMENTAL INPUTS Organization of chapter in ISSO Background Motivation Finite sample
More informationD-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models
D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models Jie Yang University of Illinois at Chicago Joint with Xianwei Bu and Dibyen Majumdar October 12, 2017 1 Multinomial Logistic Models Cumulative logit model:
More informationPenalized D-optimal design for dose finding
Penalized for dose finding Luc Pronzato Laboratoire I3S, CNRS-Univ. Nice Sophia Antipolis, France 2/ 35 Outline 3/ 35 Bernoulli-type experiments: Y i {0,1} (success or failure) η(x,θ) = Prob(Y i = 1 x
More informationPackage bpp. December 13, 2016
Type Package Package bpp December 13, 2016 Title Computations Around Bayesian Predictive Power Version 1.0.0 Date 2016-12-13 Author Kaspar Rufibach, Paul Jordan, Markus Abt Maintainer Kaspar Rufibach Depends
More informationDesigning Experiments for Nonlinear Models - An Introduction
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Faculty and Researchers Faculty and Researchers Collection 2009-08 Designing Experiments for Nonlinear Models - An Introduction Johnson, Rachel
More informationAn Approach to Constructing Good Two-level Orthogonal Factorial Designs with Large Run Sizes
An Approach to Constructing Good Two-level Orthogonal Factorial Designs with Large Run Sizes by Chenlu Shi B.Sc. (Hons.), St. Francis Xavier University, 013 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of
More informationExperimental designs for multiple responses with different models
Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate College 2015 Experimental designs for multiple responses with different models Wilmina Mary Marget Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at:
More informationDesign of Screening Experiments with Partial Replication
Design of Screening Experiments with Partial Replication David J. Edwards Department of Statistical Sciences & Operations Research Virginia Commonwealth University Robert D. Leonard Department of Information
More informationA MULTIPLE DECISION PROCEDURE FOR TESTING WITH ORDERED ALTERNATIVES. A Thesis by. Alexandra Kathleen Echart
A MULTIPLE DECISION PROCEDURE FOR TESTING WITH ORDERED ALTERNATIVES A Thesis by Alexandra Kathleen Echart Bachelor of Science, Wichita State University, 2014 Submitted to the Department of Mathematics,
More informationMULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DESIGNS IN A DOSE-RESPONSE EXPERIMENT
New Developments and Applications in Experimental Design IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series (1998) Volume 34 MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DESIGNS IN A DOSE-RESPONSE EXPERIMENT BY WEI ZHU AND WENG KEE WONG 1 State
More informationStochastic Optimization with Inequality Constraints Using Simultaneous Perturbations and Penalty Functions
International Journal of Control Vol. 00, No. 00, January 2007, 1 10 Stochastic Optimization with Inequality Constraints Using Simultaneous Perturbations and Penalty Functions I-JENG WANG and JAMES C.
More informationUnderstanding p Values
Understanding p Values James H. Steiger Vanderbilt University James H. Steiger Vanderbilt University Understanding p Values 1 / 29 Introduction Introduction In this module, we introduce the notion of a
More informationComputational Statistics and Data Analysis. Robustness of design for the testing of lack of fit and for estimation in binary response models
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54 (200) 337 3378 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computational Statistics and Data Analysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/csda Robustness
More informationOptimal designs for rational regression models
Optimal designs for rational regression models Holger Dette, Christine Kiss Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät für Mathematik 44780 Bochum, Germany holger.dette@ruhr-uni-bochum.de tina.kiss12@googlemail.com
More informationBIOS 312: Precision of Statistical Inference
and Power/Sample Size and Standard Errors BIOS 312: of Statistical Inference Chris Slaughter Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine January 3, 2013 Outline Overview and Power/Sample
More informationUTILIZING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE IN ROBUST OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN. EE & CS, The University of Newcastle, Australia EE, Technion, Israel.
UTILIZING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE IN ROBUST OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN Graham C. Goodwin James S. Welsh Arie Feuer Milan Depich EE & CS, The University of Newcastle, Australia 38. EE, Technion, Israel. Abstract:
More informationSome Approximations of the Logistic Distribution with Application to the Covariance Matrix of Logistic Regression
Working Paper 2013:9 Department of Statistics Some Approximations of the Logistic Distribution with Application to the Covariance Matrix of Logistic Regression Ronnie Pingel Working Paper 2013:9 June
More informationAn effective approach for obtaining optimal sampling windows for population pharmacokinetic experiments
An effective approach for obtaining optimal sampling windows for population pharmacokinetic experiments Kayode Ogungbenro and Leon Aarons Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research School of Pharmacy
More informationPROBABILITY AND STATISTICS Vol. III - Statistical Experiments and Optimal Design - Andrej Pázman STATISTICAL EXPERIMENTS AND OPTIMAL DESIGN
STATISTICAL EXPERIMENTS AND OPTIMAL DESIGN Andrej Pázman Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia Keywords: Experiment design, linear statistical model, nonlinear regression, least squares, information
More informationINFORMATION APPROACH FOR CHANGE POINT DETECTION OF WEIBULL MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS. Tao Jiang. A Thesis
INFORMATION APPROACH FOR CHANGE POINT DETECTION OF WEIBULL MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS Tao Jiang A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the
More informationOPTIMAL DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS WITH POSSIBLY FAILING TRIALS
Statistica Sinica 12(2002), 1145-1155 OPTIMAL DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS WITH POSSIBLY FAILING TRIALS Lorens A. Imhof, Dale Song and Weng Kee Wong RWTH Aachen, Scirex Corporation and University of California
More informationMultiplicative Algorithm for computing Optimum Designs
for computing s DAE Conference 2012 Roberto Dorta-Guerra, Raúl Martín Martín, Mercedes Fernández-Guerrero and Licesio J. Rodríguez-Aragón Optimum Experimental Design group October 20, 2012 http://areaestadistica.uclm.es/oed
More informationInformation in a Two-Stage Adaptive Optimal Design
Information in a Two-Stage Adaptive Optimal Design Department of Statistics, University of Missouri Designed Experiments: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications DEMA 2011 Isaac Newton Institute for
More informationComparing Adaptive Designs and the. Classical Group Sequential Approach. to Clinical Trial Design
Comparing Adaptive Designs and the Classical Group Sequential Approach to Clinical Trial Design Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK http://people.bath.ac.uk/mascj
More informationLifetime prediction and confidence bounds in accelerated degradation testing for lognormal response distributions with an Arrhenius rate relationship
Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Research & Creative Works Spring 01 Lifetime prediction and confidence bounds in accelerated degradation testing for lognormal response distributions with
More informationBayesian Sequential Design under Model Uncertainty using Sequential Monte Carlo
Bayesian Sequential Design under Model Uncertainty using Sequential Monte Carlo, James McGree, Tony Pettitt October 7, 2 Introduction Motivation Model choice abundant throughout literature Take into account
More informationCSC321 Lecture 18: Learning Probabilistic Models
CSC321 Lecture 18: Learning Probabilistic Models Roger Grosse Roger Grosse CSC321 Lecture 18: Learning Probabilistic Models 1 / 25 Overview So far in this course: mainly supervised learning Language modeling
More informationHow Much Evidence Should One Collect?
How Much Evidence Should One Collect? Remco Heesen October 10, 2013 Abstract This paper focuses on the question how much evidence one should collect before deciding on the truth-value of a proposition.
More informationAssessing the Effect of Prior Distribution Assumption on the Variance Parameters in Evaluating Bioequivalence Trials
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Mathematics Theses Department of Mathematics and Statistics 8--006 Assessing the Effect of Prior Distribution Assumption on the Variance
More informationStatistics 203: Introduction to Regression and Analysis of Variance Course review
Statistics 203: Introduction to Regression and Analysis of Variance Course review Jonathan Taylor - p. 1/?? Today Review / overview of what we learned. - p. 2/?? General themes in regression models Specifying
More informationEstimation of AUC from 0 to Infinity in Serial Sacrifice Designs
Estimation of AUC from 0 to Infinity in Serial Sacrifice Designs Martin J. Wolfsegger Department of Biostatistics, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria Thomas Jaki Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina,
More informationOptimal designs for estimating the slope in nonlinear regression
Optimal designs for estimating the slope in nonlinear regression Holger Dette Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät für Mathematik 44780 Bochum, Germany e-mail: holger.dette@rub.de Viatcheslav B. Melas St.
More informationTwo-Stage Computing Budget Allocation. Approach for Response Surface Method PENG JI
Two-Stage Computing Budget Allocation Approach for Response Surface Method PENG JI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 Two-Stage Computing Budget Allocation Approach for Response Surface Method PENG
More informationDesign of preclinical combination studies
University of Manchester, UK Talk Outline 1 Preliminaries What is a drug combination? Data structures. Ray design 2 Combination index Sources of variability 3 Two drugs Analysis of data 4 Types of studies
More informationModel Selection Tutorial 2: Problems With Using AIC to Select a Subset of Exposures in a Regression Model
Model Selection Tutorial 2: Problems With Using AIC to Select a Subset of Exposures in a Regression Model Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic & Analytic (MEGA) Epidemiology School of Population
More informationLOCALLY D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS BASED ON A CLASS OF COMPOSED MODELS RESULTED FROM BLENDING EMAX AND ONE-COMPARTMENT MODELS. By X. Fang, A.S.
Submitted to the Annals of Statistics LOCALLY D-OPTIMAL DESIGNS BASED ON A CLASS OF COMPOSED MODELS RESULTED FROM BLENDING EMAX AND ONE-COMPARTMENT MODELS By X. Fang, A.S. Hedayat University of Illinois
More informationD-Optimal Designs for Second-Order Response Surface Models with Qualitative Factors
Journal of Data Science 920), 39-53 D-Optimal Designs for Second-Order Response Surface Models with Qualitative Factors Chuan-Pin Lee and Mong-Na Lo Huang National Sun Yat-sen University Abstract: Central
More informationSelecting the Best Simulated System. Dave Goldsman. Georgia Tech. July 3 4, 2003
Selecting the Best Simulated System Dave Goldsman Georgia Tech July 3 4, 2003 Barry Nelson 1 Outline of Talk 1. Introduction. Look at procedures to select the... 2. Normal Population with the Largest Mean
More informationAdaptive Designs: Why, How and When?
Adaptive Designs: Why, How and When? Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, UK http://people.bath.ac.uk/mascj ISBS Conference Shanghai, July 2008 1 Adaptive designs:
More informationAn Approach for Identifiability of Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models
An Approach for Identifiability of Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models Vittal Shivva 1 * Julia Korell 12 Ian Tucker 1 Stephen Duffull 1 1 School of Pharmacy University of Otago Dunedin New
More informationPower and Sample Size Calculations with the Additive Hazards Model
Journal of Data Science 10(2012), 143-155 Power and Sample Size Calculations with the Additive Hazards Model Ling Chen, Chengjie Xiong, J. Philip Miller and Feng Gao Washington University School of Medicine
More informationAt the end, f(m) 0. We can see how this works with a plot using the objective function f(x) = 1/2 e x2 :
Root finding algorithms Consider a function f(x) for x (a, b). A root of f is a number x such that f(x ) = 0. Many computational problems can be viewed as a root finding problem, in particular optimums
More informationOPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE DESIGN VARIABLES
Statistica Sinica 21 (2011, 1415-1430 OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS WITH MULTIPLE DESIGN VARIABLES Min Yang, Bin Zhang and Shuguang Huang University of Missouri, University of Alabama-Birmingham
More informationBayesian Inference on Joint Mixture Models for Survival-Longitudinal Data with Multiple Features. Yangxin Huang
Bayesian Inference on Joint Mixture Models for Survival-Longitudinal Data with Multiple Features Yangxin Huang Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, COPH, USF, Tampa, FL yhuang@health.usf.edu January
More informationResponse Surface Methods
Response Surface Methods 3.12.2014 Goals of Today s Lecture See how a sequence of experiments can be performed to optimize a response variable. Understand the difference between first-order and second-order
More informationComparing Group Means When Nonresponse Rates Differ
UNF Digital Commons UNF Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2015 Comparing Group Means When Nonresponse Rates Differ Gabriela M. Stegmann University of North Florida Suggested Citation Stegmann,
More informationPrediction problems 3: Validation and Model Checking
Prediction problems 3: Validation and Model Checking Data Science 101 Team May 17, 2018 Outline Validation Why is it important How should we do it? Model checking Checking whether your model is a good
More informationImplementing Response-Adaptive Randomization in Multi-Armed Survival Trials
Implementing Response-Adaptive Randomization in Multi-Armed Survival Trials BASS Conference 2009 Alex Sverdlov, Bristol-Myers Squibb A.Sverdlov (B-MS) Response-Adaptive Randomization 1 / 35 Joint work
More informationA New Robust Design Strategy for Sigmoidal Models Based on Model Nesting
A New Robust Design Strategy for Sigmoidal Models Based on Model Nesting Timothy E. O'Brien Department of Statistics, Washington State University 1 Introduction For a given process, researchers often have
More informationCh 4. Linear Models for Classification
Ch 4. Linear Models for Classification Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, 2006. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Pohang University of Science and echnology 77 Cheongam-ro,
More informationHierarchical Models & Bayesian Model Selection
Hierarchical Models & Bayesian Model Selection Geoffrey Roeder Departments of Computer Science and Statistics University of British Columbia Jan. 20, 2016 Contact information Please report any typos or
More informationConstruction and statistical analysis of adaptive group sequential designs for randomized clinical trials
Construction and statistical analysis of adaptive group sequential designs for randomized clinical trials Antoine Chambaz (MAP5, Université Paris Descartes) joint work with Mark van der Laan Atelier INSERM
More informationLatent Trait Reliability
Latent Trait Reliability Lecture #7 ICPSR Item Response Theory Workshop Lecture #7: 1of 66 Lecture Overview Classical Notions of Reliability Reliability with IRT Item and Test Information Functions Concepts
More informationOptimal Design of Experiments. for Dual-Response Systems. Sarah Ellen Burke
Optimal Design of Experiments for Dual-Response Systems by Sarah Ellen Burke A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved July 2016 by
More informationLecture Outline. Biost 518 Applied Biostatistics II. Choice of Model for Analysis. Choice of Model. Choice of Model. Lecture 10: Multiple Regression:
Biost 518 Applied Biostatistics II Scott S. Emerson, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Biostatistics University of Washington Lecture utline Choice of Model Alternative Models Effect of data driven selection of
More informationOptimal designs for estimating the slope of a regression
Optimal designs for estimating the slope of a regression Holger Dette Ruhr-Universität Bochum Fakultät für Mathematik 4480 Bochum, Germany e-mail: holger.dette@rub.de Viatcheslav B. Melas St. Petersburg
More informationσ(a) = a N (x; 0, 1 2 ) dx. σ(a) = Φ(a) =
Until now we have always worked with likelihoods and prior distributions that were conjugate to each other, allowing the computation of the posterior distribution to be done in closed form. Unfortunately,
More informationA-optimal designs for generalized linear model with two parameters
A-optimal designs for generalized linear model with two parameters Min Yang * University of Missouri - Columbia Abstract An algebraic method for constructing A-optimal designs for two parameter generalized
More informationLocal Polynomial Regression with Application to Sea Surface Temperatures
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2012 Local Polynomial Regression with Application to Sea Surface Temperatures Michael Finney Clemson University, finney2@clemson.edu Follow this and additional
More informationCSSS/STAT/SOC 321 Case-Based Social Statistics I. Levels of Measurement
CSSS/STAT/SOC 321 Case-Based Social Statistics I Levels of Measurement Christopher Adolph Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences University of Washington, Seattle
More informationCS 361: Probability & Statistics
October 17, 2017 CS 361: Probability & Statistics Inference Maximum likelihood: drawbacks A couple of things might trip up max likelihood estimation: 1) Finding the maximum of some functions can be quite
More informationA Simulation Study to Compare CAT Strategies for Cognitive Diagnosis
A Simulation Study to Compare CAT Strategies for Cognitive Diagnosis Xueli Xu Department of Statistics,University of Illinois Hua-Hua Chang Department of Educational Psychology,University of Texas Jeff
More informationStatistical Simulation An Introduction
James H. Steiger Department of Psychology and Human Development Vanderbilt University Regression Modeling, 2009 Simulation Through Bootstrapping Introduction 1 Introduction When We Don t Need Simulation
More informationStat 5101 Lecture Notes
Stat 5101 Lecture Notes Charles J. Geyer Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 by Charles J. Geyer May 7, 2001 ii Stat 5101 (Geyer) Course Notes Contents 1 Random Variables and Change of Variables 1 1.1 Random
More informationBayesian decision procedures for dose escalation - a re-analysis
Bayesian decision procedures for dose escalation - a re-analysis Maria R Thomas Queen Mary,University of London February 9 th, 2010 Overview Phase I Dose Escalation Trial Terminology Regression Models
More informationPredicting long term impact of scientific publications
Master thesis Applied Mathematics (Chair: Stochastic Operations Research) Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS) Predicting long term impact of scientific publications
More informationROBUST DISCRIMINATION DESIGNS OVER HELLINGER NEIGHBOURHOODS 1. BY RUI HU AND DOUGLAS P. WIENS MacEwan University and University of Alberta
The Annals of Statistics 2017, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1638 1663 DOI: 10.1214/16-AOS1503 Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2017 ROBUST DISCRIMINATION DESIGNS OVER HELLINGER NEIGHBOURHOODS 1 BY RUI HU AND DOUGLAS
More informationUse of frequentist and Bayesian approaches for extrapolating from adult efficacy data to design and interpret confirmatory trials in children
Use of frequentist and Bayesian approaches for extrapolating from adult efficacy data to design and interpret confirmatory trials in children Lisa Hampson, Franz Koenig and Martin Posch Department of Mathematics
More informationPQL Estimation Biases in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
PQL Estimation Biases in Generalized Linear Mixed Models Woncheol Jang Johan Lim March 18, 2006 Abstract The penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) approach is the most common estimation procedure for the generalized
More informationST495: Survival Analysis: Hypothesis testing and confidence intervals
ST495: Survival Analysis: Hypothesis testing and confidence intervals Eric B. Laber Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University April 3, 2014 I remember that one fateful day when Coach took
More informationSpecifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus. (Revised )
Ronald H. Heck 1 University of Hawai i at Mānoa Handout #20 Specifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus (Revised 12-1-2014) The SEM approach offers a contrasting framework for use in analyzing
More informationSequential Procedure for Testing Hypothesis about Mean of Latent Gaussian Process
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 62, 3083-3093 Sequential Procedure for Testing Hypothesis about Mean of Latent Gaussian Process Julia Bondarenko Helmut-Schmidt University Hamburg University
More informationOne-step ahead adaptive D-optimal design on a finite design. space is asymptotically optimal
Author manuscript, published in "Metrika (2009) 20" DOI : 10.1007/s00184-008-0227-y One-step ahead adaptive D-optimal design on a finite design space is asymptotically optimal Luc Pronzato Laboratoire
More informationBayesian Networks: Construction, Inference, Learning and Causal Interpretation. Volker Tresp Summer 2016
Bayesian Networks: Construction, Inference, Learning and Causal Interpretation Volker Tresp Summer 2016 1 Introduction So far we were mostly concerned with supervised learning: we predicted one or several
More informationF. Combes (1,2,3) S. Retout (2), N. Frey (2) and F. Mentré (1) PODE 2012
Prediction of shrinkage of individual parameters using the Bayesian information matrix in nonlinear mixed-effect models with application in pharmacokinetics F. Combes (1,2,3) S. Retout (2), N. Frey (2)
More informationStep-Stress Models and Associated Inference
Department of Mathematics & Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur August 19, 2014 Outline Accelerated Life Test 1 Accelerated Life Test 2 3 4 5 6 7 Outline Accelerated Life Test 1 Accelerated
More informationLearning Gaussian Process Models from Uncertain Data
Learning Gaussian Process Models from Uncertain Data Patrick Dallaire, Camille Besse, and Brahim Chaib-draa DAMAS Laboratory, Computer Science & Software Engineering Department, Laval University, Canada
More informationIntroduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 01: Introduction and Overview
Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 01: Introduction and Overview Michael R. Kosorok, Ph.D. Professor and Chair of Biostatistics Professor of Statistics and Operations
More informationExamining the accuracy of the normal approximation to the poisson random variable
Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects 2009 Examining the accuracy of the
More informationEstimation and Model Selection in Mixed Effects Models Part I. Adeline Samson 1
Estimation and Model Selection in Mixed Effects Models Part I Adeline Samson 1 1 University Paris Descartes Summer school 2009 - Lipari, Italy These slides are based on Marc Lavielle s slides Outline 1
More information