APPENDIX 9. Azeri Chirag Gunashi Phase III Drill Cuttings Modelling
|
|
- Barbara Norris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment Final Report APPENDIX 9 Azeri Chirag Gunashi Phase III Drill Cuttings Modelling ACG Phase 3 ESIA A9/1 October 2004
2 Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment Final Report This page is intentionally blank ACG Phase 3 ESIA A9/2 October 2004
3 Final Report TITLE Applied Science Associates, Aquitaine Maison Naba Castetbon FRANCE Tel: (0033) Fax: (0033) Applied science Associates, Inc 70 Dean Knauss Drive Narragansett USA Tel: (001) Fax: (001) Drill Cuttings Modelling Study In Support of the Azeri Chirag Gunashi Phase III EIA AUTHOR(S) Matthew Ward, P.E., Jill Rowe and Roddy Thomas CLIENT Robert Fitzsimmons URS Corporation Limited PROJECT NUMBER ASA February 2004
4 Table of Contents List of Figures... ii List of Tables...iii Introduction...1 Mud and Drill Cuttings Simulation Specifications...2 Description of Current Field...5 Mud and Drill Cuttings Dispersion Simulation Results...8 Combined Deposition Results...16 Summary...18 References...20 i
5 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of drilling platforms offshore Baku, Azerbaijan. 1 Figure 2. Caspian Sea hydrodynamic simulation computational grid. 5 Figure 3. Computational grid offshore Baku. 6 Figure 4. Current measurement data collection sites. 6 Figure 5. Characteristic hydrodynamic model output for the winter season. 7 Figure 6. Characteristic hydrodynamic model output for the summer season. 7 Figure 7. Stage I Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. 11 Figure 8. Stage I Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ Figure 9. DWG site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. 12 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. 13 Figure 10. Stage II predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under average current conditions. 14 Figure 11. Stage II predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under average current conditions. 15 ii
6 List of Tables Table 1. Seasonal Current Conditions....2 Table 2. Stage I drilling specifications at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells....2 Table 3. Stage I drilling specifications at the MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells....3 Table 4. Stage I drilling specifications at the DUQ DWG Site Wells....3 Table 5. Stage II drilling specifications at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells....4 Table 6. Stage II drilling specifications at the MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells....4 Table 7. Particle size distribution and associated fall velocity...4 Table 8. Stage I MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 10 wells....9 Table 9. Stage I DUQ DWG Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 38 wells....9 Table 10. Stage I MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 4 wells....9 Table 11. Stage II MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 10 wells....9 Table 12. Stage II MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 4 wells Table 13. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site for a 10 well release...16 Table 14. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the Southern Subsea site for a 4 well release...16 Table 15. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36, Stage II 26 wells and the Stage I 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill and DUQ DWG sites for 10, 10 and 38 well releases, respectively...17 Table 16. Average predicted results for all simulated well releases Table 17. Average projected results for combinations of mud and drill cutting dispersion simulations...19 iii
7 Introduction In support of the Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi Field offshore Baku, Azerbaijan, Applied Science Associates (ASA) has conducted a drill cuttings study to establish the mixing, dispersive transport and settlement of all potential material released from platforms, located approximately 110 km offshore Baku, Azerbaijan (Figure 1). The simulation of the mud and drill cuttings from the platform sites was conducted using ASA s MUDMAP modeling system (Appendix 1). This report presents a description of the MUDMAP model system, the methodology and data employed in the study and the modeling results. Figure 1. Location of drilling platforms offshore Baku, Azerbaijan. 1
8 Mud and Drill Cuttings Simulation Specifications The simulation of the release of mud and drill cuttings from the platforms, located approximately 110 km offshore Baku, Azerbaijan (Figure 1), were conducted, using ASA s MUDMAP modeling system (described in Appendix 1), during summer and winter periods under average and maximum current conditions (Table 1) as described by the ASA Caspian Sea model developed for the Phase I EIA. Five drilling specifications were simulated, in two stages, and are presented in Tables 2-6. Tables 2-4 present the specifications for the first stage and Tables 5-6 present the specifications for the second stage. Table 7 presents the particle size distribution and associated fall velocities of the released material. The fall velocities show that 90% of the material is relatively large ( µm) and will settle relatively quickly depending upon the release depth. While the remaining 10% of the particles will reside in the water column and be transported further away from the platform. Table 1. Seasonal Current Conditions. Season Current Condition Start Time Principle Current Orientation Winter Maximum 21 January at 1600 hrs North-Northeast Winter Average 09 January at 1200 hrs Southwest Summer Maximum 05 August at 1600 hrs Northeast Summer Average 22 July at 0000 hrs Southwest Table 2. Stage I drilling specifications at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells. Parameter Specification Location: E N 36 top-hole section (seawater): Section length: 150 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 180 m 3 26 top-hole section (seawater/bentonite): Discharge Location: Discharge Orientation Water Depth: Seawater: 359 m 3 Total: 539 m 3 Section length: 350 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: 9.86 m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 173 m 3 WBM: 104 m 3 Total: 277 m 3 To seafloor Vertical / upwards 175m 2
9 Table 3. Stage I drilling specifications at the MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells. Parameter Specification Location (Northern Subsea Site) E N 36 top-hole section (seawater): 26 top-hole section (seawater/bentonite): Discharge Location: Discharge Orientation Water Depth Section length: 150 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 180 m 3 Seawater: 359 m 3 Total: 539 m 3 Section length: 350 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: 9.86 m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 173 m 3 WBM: 104 m 3 Total: 277 m 3 To seafloor Vertical / upwards. 275 m Table 4. Stage I drilling specifications at the DUQ DWG Site Wells. Parameter Specification Location: 26 top-hole section (seawater/bentonite): Discharge Location 26 Section: Discharge Orientation Water Depth: E N Section length: 350 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: 9.86 m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 173 m 3 WBM: 104 m 3 Total: 277 m 3 To seafloor via -138 m below sea surface Vertical / downwards 175 m 3
10 Table 5. Stage II drilling specifications at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells. Parameter Specification Location: E N 26 top-hole section Section length: 350 m (seawater/bentonite): Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: 9.86 m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 173 m 3 Discharge Location: Water Depth: WBM: 104 m 3 Total: 277 m 3 To seafloor via caisson@ -11m from the sea surface 175m Table 6. Stage II drilling specifications at the MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells. Parameter Specification Location (Northern Subsea Site) E N 26 top-hole section (seawater/bentonite): Discharge Location: Water Depth Section length: 350 m Cuttings Generation/Discharge Rate: 9.86 m/hr Volumes: Cuttings: 173 m 3 WBM: 104 m 3 Total: 277 m 3 To seafloor via caisson@ -11m from the sea surface 275 m Table 7. Particle size distribution and associated fall velocity. Nominal Grain Size (microns) Specific Gravity Percentage of Total Mass Fall Velocity (m/hr)
11 Description of Current Field The current fields used for this study were supplied by the ASA Caspian Sea Model developed during the Phase I Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi EIA (ASA 2001). The computational domain of the hydrodynamic simulation consisted of the entire Caspian Sea in order to minimize the complexity of environmental forcing data. The computational grid developed for this area was handled through the application of ASA s step-wise-continuous-rectangular gridding strategy (Isaji et al. 2001). In the northern Caspian Sea coarse grid resolution, on the order of 20 km, is sufficient in order to capture the large scale dynamics and appropriate volumetric transport of water. The grid resolution was increased in the southern Caspian, 41.5 N southward, to approximately 5 km while a very fine scale grid of 2.5 km was applied within the Baku region of study. Figures 2 and 3 show the entire computational grid and the fine resolution grid within the Baku region, respectively. The hydrodynamic model was validated through a comparison to current measurements collected by the Azerbaijan International Operating Company along a proposed pipeline route between Chirag and Sangachal in the Caspian Sea for the winter season from 01 February 2000 to 01 April Figure 4 shows the location of the data collection points designated KP174, KP145, KP115, KP85, KP65, and KP45. The hydrodynamic model was then applied to the winter and summer seasons for the year Figures 5 and 6 present representative current patterns predicted by the hydrodynamic model for the winter and summer seasons, respectively. A complete description of the environmental data, validation and application of the ASA Caspian Sea Model can be found in the ASA report Hydrodynamic and Dispersion Modeling for the Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi Field Offshore Baku, Azerbaijan (ASA 2001). Figure 2. Caspian Sea hydrodynamic simulation computational grid. 5
12 Figure 3. Computational grid offshore Baku. Figure 4. Current measurement data collection sites. 6
13 Figure 5. Characteristic hydrodynamic model output for the winter season. Figure 6. Characteristic hydrodynamic model output for the summer season. 7
14 Mud and Drill Cuttings Dispersion Simulation Results MUDMAP model simulations were run at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site, the MODU Southern Subsea site and at the DUQ DWG site using the parameters given in Tables 2-6, for the summer and winter seasons under average and maximum current conditions (Table 1). At each site and for each seasonal current condition single and multiple well runs were conducted. The multiple well scenarios consisted of 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill location, 38 wells at the DUQ DWG location and 4 wells at the MODU Southern Subsea site. Tables 8-12 provide the characteristics for the multiple well releases, of the sediment deposits predicted by the MUDMAP model. The tables list the bottom area covered by a sediment deposit that is greater than 1mm thick, the maximum horizontal extent to the 1 mm contour from the discharge location and the maximum sediment deposit thickness at the site. Figures 7-10 present representative deposition patterns for each multiple well simulation and details of each simulation are presented in Appendices 2-6. The simulations conducted for the 10 well multiple release during Stage I, from the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site, predicted an average area covered out to the 1 mm contour of m 2 with an average maximum horizontal extent from the release location of 230 m and an average maximum deposition thickness of 220 cm. The simulations conducted for the 38 well multiple release during Stage I, from the DUQ DWG site, predicted an average area covered out to the 1 mm contour of m 2 with an average maximum horizontal extent from the release location of 940 m and an average maximum deposition thickness of 217 cm. The simulations conducted for the 4 well multiple release during Stage I, from the Southern Subsea site, predicted an average area covered out to the 1 mm contour of m 2 with an average maximum horizontal extent from the release location of 78 m and an average maximum deposition thickness of 77 cm. The simulations conducted for the 10 well multiple release during Stage II, from the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site, predicted an average area covered out to the 1 mm contour of m 2 with an average maximum horizontal extent from the release location of 109 m and an average maximum deposition thickness of 70 cm. The simulations conducted for the 4 well multiple release during Stage II, from the Southern Subsea site, predicted an average area covered out to the 1 mm contour of m 2 with an average maximum horizontal extent from the release location of 99 m and an average maximum deposition thickness of 24 cm. The difference between the results of the simulations can be attributed to the variations in current speeds between the release locations, the vertical release location and the total mass of the mud and drill cuttings. For example the maximum deposition thickness at the MODU DWG site, during Stage I, is larger than that during Stage II due to the depth of the release since the material released during Stage II is near the surface of the water column it will disperse over a larger area. However, the maximum deposition thickness at the MODU DWG site, for both Stages I and II, is larger than that at the Southern Subsea site due to slightly weaker currents to the north and the fact that the total mass of material released from the MODU DWG site is 2.5 times greater than that released at the Southern Subsea site. 8
15 Table 8. Stage I MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 10 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) Table 9. Stage I DUQ DWG Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 38 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) Table 10. Stage I MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 4 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) Table 11. Stage II MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 10 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) 9
16 Table 12. Stage II MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 4 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) 10
17 Figure 7. Stage I Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. 11
18 Figure 8. Stage I Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ DWG site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. 12
19 Figure 9. Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. 13
20 Figure 10. Stage II predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under average current conditions. 14
21 Figure 11. Stage II predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under average current conditions. 15
22 Combined Deposition Results A presentation of the combined results for certain simulations conducted during Stage I and II are presented below. Specifically, a combination of the deposition results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site for a 10 well release, the results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the Southern Subsea site for a 4 well release, and the results from the Stage I 36, Stage II 26 wells and the Stage I 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill and DUQ DWG sites for 10, 10 and 38 well releases, respectively, were requested to be studied. However, since Stage II was unplanned at the onset of the study and the 36 and 26 well sections were modeled during Stage I as a single release at the MODU and Southern Subsea sites it is not possible to directly combine the results. However, a projected combination is possible due to the wide range in the release depths between the two stages. The method of constructing the projected combinations consists of reducing the results from Stage I at the MODU and Southern Subsea sites by 60%. This will provide an approximation to a release only from the 36 well section since out of the total release of 457 m 3 only 180 m 3 is released from this section. The largest deposition footprint between the Stage I and Stage II results will then be determined and assumed to represent the projected combination in addition to the maximum deposition thickness being directly summed between the simulations. The projected combined results as specified above are presented in Tables and representative projected regions of potential impact can be represented by the figures in Appendices 4,5 and 6 for the multiple well simulations. Table 13. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site for a 10 well release. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) Table 14. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36 well and the Stage II 26 well at the Southern Subsea site for a 4 well release. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) 16
23 Table 15. Projected combined deposition results from the Stage I 36, Stage II 26 wells and the Stage I 26 well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill and DUQ DWG sites for 10, 10 and 38 well releases, respectively. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) 17
24 Summary In support of the Phase III Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi Field offshore Baku, Azerbaijan, Applied Science Associates (ASA) has conducted a drill cuttings study to establish the mixing, dispersive transport and settlement of all potential material released from platforms, located approximately 110 km offshore Baku, Azerbaijan. The simulation of the mud and drill cuttings from the platform sites was conducted using ASA s MUDMAP modeling system during summer and winter periods under average and maximum current conditions as described by the ASA Caspian Sea model developed for the Phase I EIA. Single and multiple well drilling specifications were simulated: At the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site and the MODU Southern Subsea site, 36 and 26 hole sections were simulated with the spoils released at the seabed in addition to a release from the 26 hole section at -11m depth, with 10 and 4 multiple wells, respectively. While at the DUQ DWG site a 26 hole section was simulated with the mud and cuttings released at a depth of 138 m below the sea surface, with 38 multiple wells. An additional analysis to determine the projected area of impact due to a combination of the simulations was conducted. The current fields used for this study were supplied by the ASA Caspian Sea Model developed during the Phase I Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi EIA (ASA 2001). The computational domain of the hydrodynamic model consisted of the entire Caspian Sea in order to minimize the complexity of environmental forcing data. The hydrodynamic model was validated through a comparison to current measurements collected by the Azerbaijan International Operating Company along a proposed pipeline route between Chirag and Sangachal in the Caspian Sea for the winter season from 01 February 2000 to 01 April 2000 and applied to the winter and summer seasons for the year The average area covered to the 1 mm contour, the maximum horizontal extent to the 1 mm contour and the maximum deposition thickness are presented in Tables 16 and 17 for the mud and cuttings simulations and the combination analysis, respectively. Table 16. Average predicted results for all simulated well releases. Simulation # Stage Location Well Sections 1 I MODU DWG 2 I DUQ DWG 3 I Southern Subsea 4 II MODU DWG 5 II Southern Subsea Release Depth (m) Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness 36 and Seabed m and Seabed m m Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) 18
25 Table 17. Average projected results for combinations of mud and drill cutting dispersion simulations. Combined Simulations Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) Thickness 1(36 ) and (36 ) and (36 ), 3 and In the studies conducted in support of Phase I and II, all of the cuttings were released from the water column which resulted in the prediction of largely dispersed thin layers of material. While the majority of the simulations for this study occurred at the seabed. Such releases will most likely minimize turbidity and environmental impact zone but the potential for interaction of the mound with the platform sub-structure exists. If further studies of this type are to be commissioned it is recommended that measurements of the mounds thickness and location be collected in conjunction with the bottom currents shortly after operations have ceased and be provided to the modeling contractor. This will assist in future model validation and the potential evaluation of long-term mound erosion and migration. 19
26 References Applied Science Associates (ASA), Hydrodynamic and Dispersion Modeling for the Azeri, Chirag, Gunashi Field Offshore Baku, Azerbaijan. Final Report to URS Dames & Moore, August Isaji, T., E. Howlett, C. Dalton, and E. Anderson Stepwise -Continuous Variable- Rectangular Grid Hydrodynamics Model. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar, Edmonton (Alberta) Canada, pp , June 12,
27 Appendix 1: MUDMAP Description MUDMAP is a personal computer-based model developed by ASA to predict the near and far field transport, dispersion, and bottom deposition of drill mud s and cuttings and produced water (Spaulding et al; 1994; Spaulding, 1994). In MUDMAP, the equations governing conservation of mass, momentum, buoyancy, and solid particle flux are formulated using integral plume theory and then solved using a Runge Kutta numerical integration technique. The model includes three stages: convective descent/ascent, dynamic collapse and far field dispersion. It allows the transport and fate of the release to be modeled through all stages of its movement. The initial dilution and spreading of the plume release is predicted in the convective descent/ascent stage. The plume descends if the discharged material is more dense than the local water at the point of release and ascends if the density is lower than that of the receiving water. In the dynamic collapse stage, the dilution and dispersion of the discharge is predicted when the release impacts the surface, bottom, or becomes trapped by vertical density gradients in the water column. The far field stage predicts the transport and fate of the discharge caused by the ambient current and turbulence fields. MUDMAP is based on the theoretical approach initially developed by Koh and Chang (1973) and refined and extended by Brandsma and Sauer (1983) for the convective descent/ascent and dynamic collapse stages. The far field, passive diffusion stage is based on a particle based random walk model. This is the same random walk model used in ASA s OILMAP spill modeling system (ASA, 1999). MUDMAP uses a color graphics-based user interface and provides an embedded geographic information system, environmental data management tools, and procedures to input data and to animate model output. The system can be readily applied to any location in the world. Application of MUDMAP to predict the transport and deposition of heavy and light drill fluids off Pt Conception, California and the near field plume dynamics of a laboratory experiment for a multi-component mud discharged into a uniform flowing, stratified water column are presented in Spaulding et al. (1994). King and McAllister (1996, 1998) present the application and extensive verification of the model for a produced water discharge on Australia s northwest shelf. GEMS (1998) presents the application of the model to assess the dispersion and deposition of drilling cuttings released off the northwest coast of Australia. References Applied Science Associates (ASA) OILMAP Technical and User s Manuals, Narragansett, RI. Brandsma, M. G. and T.C. Sauer The OOC model: Prediction of short term fate of drilling mud in the ocean, Part I: Model description and Part II: model results, Proceedings of Workshop on an Evaluation of Effluent Dispersion and Fate Models for OCS Platforms, Santa Barbara, California, February 7-10, GEMS, Quantitative assessment of the dispersion and seabed depositions of drill cutting discharges from Lameroo-1 AC/P16, prepared for Woodside Offshore Petroleum, prepared by Global Environmental Modeling Services, Australia, June 16, A-1
28 King, B, and F. McAllister Modeling the dispersion of produced water discharges, APPEA Journal 1998, pp King, B. and F. McAllister The application of MUDMAP for investigating the dispersion of produced water discharges from Harriet A on Australia s Northwest shelf, report to Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, prepared by Australian Institute of Marine Sciences, Townsville, Australia, August Spaulding, M. L., T. Isaji, and E. Howlett MUDMAP: A model to predict the transport and dispersion of drill muds and production water, Applied Science Associates, Inc, Narragansett, RI. Spaulding, M. L., MUDMAP: A numerical model to predict drill fluid and produced water dispersion, Offshore, Houston, Texas, March A-2
29 Appendix 2: Stage I Predicted Discharge Results at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Well Single Well Results MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-3
30 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-4
31 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-5
32 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-6
33 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. Multiple Well Results A-7
34 MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-8
35 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-9
36 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-10
37 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-11
38 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 10 wells at the MODU DWG Pre-Drill site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. Appendix 3: Stage I Predicted Discharge Results at the DUQ DWG Site Well A-12
39 Single Well Results DUQ DWG Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-13
40 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the DUQ DWG site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-14
41 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the DUQ DWG site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-15
42 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the DUQ DWG site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-16
43 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the DUQ DWG site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-17
44 Multiple Well Results DUQ DWG Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-18
45 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ DWG site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-19
46 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ DWG site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-20
47 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ DWG site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-21
48 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 38 wells at the DUQ DWG site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-22
49 Appendix 4: Stage I Predicted Discharge Results at the Southern Subsea Site Well Single Well Results MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-23
50 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the Southern Subsea site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-24
51 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the Southern Subsea site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-25
52 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the Southern Subsea site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-26
53 Predicted bottom deposition contours for a single well at the Southern Subsea site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. Multiple Well Results A-27
54 MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-28
55 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-29
56 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-30
57 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-31
58 Predicted bottom deposition contours for 4 wells at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under average current conditions. The minimum thickness depicted is 1 mm. A-32
59 Appendix 5: Stage II Predicted Discharge Results at the MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Well Single Well Results Stage II MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for a single well. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-33
60 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under average current conditions. A-34
61 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under maximum current conditions. A-35
62 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the winter season under average current conditions. A-36
63 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the winter season under maximum current conditions. A-37
64 Multiple Well Results Stage II MODU DWG Site Pre-Drill Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 10 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-38
65 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under average current conditions. A-39
66 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the summer season under maximum current conditions. A-40
67 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the winter season under average current conditions. A-41
68 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (10) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the DWG DUQ location during the winter season under maximum current conditions. Appendix 6: Stage II Predicted Discharge Results at the Southern Subsea Site Well A-42
69 Single Well Results Stage II MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for a single well. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-43
70 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under average current conditions. Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. A-44
71 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under average current conditions. A-45
72 Predicted deposition contours from a single well release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. A-46
73 Multiple Well Results Stage II MODU Southern Subsea Site Wells maximum deposition thickness and area covered by sediment greater than 1 mm thick for 4 wells. Season Current Condition Area Covered by > 1mm Thickness (m 2 ) Maximum Horizontal Extent of 1 mm Thickness Summer Maximum Summer Average Winter Maximum Winter Average Maximum Deposition Thickness (cm) A-47
74 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under average current conditions. A-48
75 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the summer season under maximum current conditions. A-49
76 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under average current conditions. A-50
77 Predicted deposition contours from a multiple well (4) release from the 26 well, 11 m below MSL at the Southern Subsea Site during the winter season under maximum current conditions. A-51
APPENDIX B HYDRODYNAMIC AND DISPERSION MODELING FOR THE AZERI, CHIRAG, GUNASHLI FIELD OFFSHORE BAKU, AZERBAIJAN: PHASE 2
APPENDIX B HYDRODYNAMIC AND DISPERSION MODELING FOR THE AZERI, CHIRAG, GUNASHLI FIELD OFFSHORE BAKU, AZERBAIJAN: PHASE 2 ASA DRAFT FINAL REPORT TITLE Applied Science Associates, Inc. 70 Dean Knauss Drive
More informationMUDMAP TM. Software Description
ASA Applied Science Associates, Inc. 70 Dean Knauss Drive Narragansett, RI 02882-1143 U.S.A. Tel: 401-789-6224 Fax: 401-789-1932 asa@asascience.com www.asascience.com MUDMAP TM Software Description MUDMAP
More informationAnnex D. Discharge Modelling Report
Annex D Discharge Modelling Report FINAL REPORT 55 Village Square Drive South Kingstown, RI 02879 Phone: +1 401 789-6224 Fax: +1 401 789-1932 www.asascience.com Oil Spill, Produced Water, Drilling Mud
More informationAnnex D. Discharge Modelling Report
Annex D Discharge Modelling Report FINAL REPORT 55 Village Square Drive South Kingstown, RI 02879 Phone: +1 401 789-6224 Fax: +1 401 789-1932 www.asascience.com Oil Spill, Produced Water, Drilling Mud
More informationIntegrated Hydrodynamic Modeling System
Integrated Hydrodynamic Modeling System Applied Science Associates, Inc. 70 Dean Knauss Drive Narragansett, RI USA 02882 www.asascience.com support@asascience.com 1 Introduction HYDROMAP is a globally
More informationDraft Report. Dispersion Modeling of Drilling Discharges: Deepwater Tano Block, offshore Ghana. VERSION: Rev1 DATE: 29 Jan 2014 ASA
Draft Report A member of the RPS Group plc 55 Village Square Drive South Kingstown, RI 02879 USA Tel: +1 (401) 789-6224 Fax: +1 (401) 789-1932 www: www.rpsgroup.com www: www.asascience.com Dispersion Modeling
More informationWQMAP (Water Quality Mapping and Analysis Program) is a proprietary. modeling system developed by Applied Science Associates, Inc.
Appendix A. ASA s WQMAP WQMAP (Water Quality Mapping and Analysis Program) is a proprietary modeling system developed by Applied Science Associates, Inc. and the University of Rhode Island for water quality
More informationB-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling
Attachment B-1 Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling 1 October 2012 Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications
More informationSediment Transport and Strata Formation in the Adriatic Sea
Sediment Transport and Strata Formation in the Adriatic Sea Wayne R. Geyer James D. Irish Peter A. Traykovski Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 Tel. (508) 289-2868, Fax: (508) 457-2194,
More informationICE PRESSURE RIDGE IMPACTS ON OIL SPILLS IN THE ALASKAN OCS
Ice in the Environment: Proceedings of the 16th IAHR International Symposium on Ice Dunedin, New Zealand, 2nd 6th December 2002 International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research ICE PRESSURE
More informationMarine Heat Flow Measurements Information Brochure
Marine Heat Flow Measurements Information Brochure 5 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 5 22 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Time (s) What is the use of heat flow measurements?
More informationModeling environmental impact on sediment caused by discharges deposited on the sea floor
Water Pollution IX 319 Modeling environmental impact on sediment caused by discharges deposited on the sea floor H. Rye SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway Abstract A model has been developed that is able to model
More informationAppendix D. Drilling Mud Dispersion Modeling
Appendix D. Drilling Mud Dispersion Modeling Appendix D Drilling Mud Dispersion Modeling D.1 Background This appendix presents the results of far-field dispersion modeling conducted around Platform Irene.
More informationSimulation of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area (the 5th report
Simulation of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area (the 5th report Press Release May 24, 2011 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 1. Outline The Ministry of Education,
More informationProject Title: Arctic Oil Spill Modeling
Project Title: Arctic Oil Spill Modeling FOA/NOFO Research Question(s): Topic 1a, Maritime Risk & Threat Analysis; Topic 2a, Coastal and Marine Critical Infrastructure development; Topic 2b, Coastal and
More informationModeling dispersal kernals with limited. information. Douglas T. Fischer, Louis W. Botsford, David M. Kaplan, J. William White, John Largier
Modeling dispersal kernals with limited http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/ habitatprotection/profile/pacificcouncil.htm information Douglas T. Fischer, Louis W. Botsford, David M. Kaplan, J. William White,
More informationBoil Model. Back Tracking of Oil Slick Movements in Offshore of Arabian Gulf Marine Waters. Developed By. Khaled Al-Salem April 2013
Boil Model Back Tracking of Oil Slick Movements in Offshore of Arabian Gulf Marine Waters Developed By Khaled Al-Salem April 2013 COASTAL AND AIR POLLUTION DEPARTMENT KUWAIT INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
More informationModeling the Columbia River Plume on the Oregon Shelf during Summer Upwelling. 2 Model
Modeling the Columbia River Plume on the Oregon Shelf during Summer Upwelling D. P. Fulton August 15, 2007 Abstract The effects of the Columbia River plume on circulation on the Oregon shelf are analyzed
More informationModeling plume from pipeline discharge of dredged material
Modeling plume from pipeline discharge of dredged material Sung-Chan Kim 1, Paul R. Schroeder, Terry K. Gerald, Tahirih C. Lackey 1, Joseph Z. Gailani 1,Presenter 1 Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Environmental
More informationDeterministic, Process Based Modeling of the Deepwater Fill of the Peïra Cava Basin, SE France*
Deterministic, Process Based Modeling of the Deepwater Fill of the Peïra Cava Basin, SE France* Romain Rouzairol 1, Riccardo Basani 2, Ernst W.M. Hansen 2, John A. Howell 3, and Tor E. Aas 4 Search and
More informationMain issues of Deltas
Global sediment supply to coastal seas and oceans; location of major river deltas RIVER DELTAS Depositional processes - Course Coastal Morphodynamics GEO3-436; lecture 4 Nile Delta, Egypt Solo Delta, Java,
More informationTexas A & M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory Model Description Form
Texas A & M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory Model Description Form JUNE, 1999 Name of Model: Two-Dimensional Alluvial River and Floodplain Model (MIKE21 CHD & CST)
More informationBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON IN THE MATTER of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 (EEZ Act) AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND
More informationSubmarine Debris flow Project Proposal to Force August 2018/v1.02
Submarine Debris flow Project Proposal to Force August 2018/v1.02 Summary The main objective of the Submarine Debris Flow study is to implement the concept of debris flow in the MassFlow3DÔ code as an
More informationSaline Layering in Prince William Sound
"The opinions expressed in this PWSRCAC-commissioned report are not necessarily those of PWSRCAC." Saline Layering in Prince William Sound This report was prepared for the Prince William Sound Regional
More information1. Canadian Energy Use
1 Unit 3 Energy 2 1. Canadian Energy Use Why are Canadians the sixth highest energy users in the world? Our major industries are energy intensive, overall industry consumes 31% of all energy in Canada.
More informationCLIMATE CHANGE AND OIL IN THE ARCTIC
CLIMATE CHANGE AND OIL IN THE ARCTIC What is Climate Change? Rising temperatures Changes in weather Warm acidic oceans Melting ice caps Rising sea levels Photo from uab.edu A Way Forward: Facing Climate
More informationAn assessment of the risk of aerial transport of rust pathogens to the Western Hemisphere and within North America
An assessment of the risk of aerial transport of rust pathogens to the Western Hemisphere and within North America Scott A. Isard Departments of Plant Pathology and Meteorology Pennsylvania State University
More informationDeveloping a Seabed Resurvey Strategy: A GIS approach to modelling seabed changes and resurvey risk
Developing a Seabed Resurvey Strategy: A GIS approach to modelling seabed changes and resurvey risk A. M. Bakare, J. G. Morley, R. R. Simons Department of Geomatic Engineering, University College London,
More informationFish and Fish Habitat Follow-up Program. Scotian Basin Exploration Project
Fish and Fish Habitat Follow-up Program Scotian Basin Exploration Project April 2018 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Scope... 1 3 EIS Commitments and Predictions... 2 4 Methodology and Reporting... 2 4.1
More information14.2 Ocean Floor Features Mapping the Ocean Floor
14.2 Ocean Floor Features Mapping the Ocean Floor The ocean floor regions are the continental margins, the ocean basin floor, and the mid-ocean ridge. 14.2 Ocean Floor Features Continental Margins A continental
More informationPAJ Oil Spill Simulation Model for the Sea of Okhotsk
PAJ Oil Spill Simulation Model for the Sea of Okhotsk 1. Introduction Fuji Research Institute Corporation Takashi Fujii In order to assist in remedial activities in the event of a major oil spill The Petroleum
More information5. TRACKING AND SURVEILLANCE
5. Knowledge of the present position of spilled oil and an ability to predict its motion are essential components of any oil spill response. This function is known as surveillance and tracking and has
More informationTutorial on Methane Hydrate. Presented by Ad Hoc Group on Methane Hydrate Research March 24, 2004
Tutorial on Methane Hydrate Presented by Ad Hoc Group on Methane Hydrate Research March 24, 2004 Tutorial on Methane Hydrate What is it and how is it formed? Where is it found? How much may exist? Multi-National
More informationGeomagnetism. The Earth s Magnetic field. Magnetization of rocks. The Earth s magnetic record. Proof of continental drift.
Geomagnetism The Earth s Magnetic field. The Earth s magnetic record Magnetization of rocks C Gary A. Glatzmaier University of California, Santa Cruz Proof of continental drift Magnetism Magnetic Force
More informationSediment Flux and Trapping on the Skagit Tidal Flats
Sediment Flux and Trapping on the Skagit Tidal Flats W. Rockwell Geyer Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution MS 11, Woods Hole, MA 02543 phone: 508-289-2868 fax: 508-457-2194 email: rgeyer@whoi.edu Peter
More informationModeling the Formation and Offshore Transport of Dense Water from High-Latitude Coastal Polynyas
Modeling the Formation and Offshore Transport of Dense Water from High-Latitude Coastal Polynyas David C. Chapman Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 phone: (508) 289-2792 fax: (508)
More informationWater Stratification under Wave Influence in the Gulf of Thailand
Water Stratification under Wave Influence in the Gulf of Thailand Pongdanai Pithayamaythakul and Pramot Sojisuporn Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
More informationShelf And Slope Sediment Transport In Strataform
Shelf And Slope Sediment Transport In Strataform David A. Cacchione Woods Hole Group 1167 Oddstad Drive Redwood City, MA 94063 phone: 650-298-0520 fax: 650-298-0523 email: dcacchione@whgrp.com Award #:
More informationModeling the Impact of Extreme Events on Margin Sedimentation
Modeling the Impact of Extreme Events on Margin Sedimentation Jasim Imran Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, 3 Main Street, Columbia, SC 2928. phone: (83)
More informationEarth Science Lesson Plan Quarter 2, Week 10, Day 1
Earth Science Lesson Plan Quarter 2, Week 10, Day 1 Outcomes for Today Standard Focus: PREPARE 1. Background knowledge necessary for today s reading. Beaches are created by the actions of waves, tides,
More informationIntegrated Space Applications in Transport, Energy & Safety Oil & Gas Exploration
Exploration & Production Technology delivering breakthrough solutions Integrated Space Applications in Transport, Energy & Safety Oil & Gas Exploration Dr Colin Grant Engineering Technical Authority, Metocean
More informationCHAM Case Study CFD Modelling of Gas Dispersion from a Ruptured Supercritical CO 2 Pipeline
CHAM Limited Pioneering CFD Software for Education & Industry CHAM Case Study CFD Modelling of Gas Dispersion from a Ruptured Supercritical CO 2 Pipeline 1. INTRODUCTION This demonstration calculation
More informationTechnical Memorandum
2855 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 4, Berkeley, CA 9475, Phone (51) 848-898, Fax (51) 848-8398 Technical Memorandum Date: September 6, 27 To: Mr. Michael Bowen, Project Manager From: Yantao Cui, Ph.D., Hydraulic
More informationModeling Salinity of First-Year Sea Ice
GFDL, Ocean Climate Model Development Barrow, AK, Jan 2009 Meeting, Oct 30, 2009 037 047 Modeling Salinity of First-Year Sea Ice Chris Petrich, Hajo Eicken, Pat Langhore Geophysical Institute University
More informationChapter 7 Benthic deep-sea carbonates: reefs and seeps
Chapter 7 Benthic deep-sea carbonates: reefs and seeps Carbonates are formed across most latitudes and they are not restricted to shallow water but are also found in all but the deepest abyssal and hadal
More informationIntraseasonal Characteristics of Rainfall for Eastern Africa Community (EAC) Hotspots: Onset and Cessation dates. In support of;
Intraseasonal Characteristics of Rainfall for Eastern Africa Community (EAC) Hotspots: Onset and Cessation dates In support of; Planning for Resilience in East Africa through Policy, Adaptation, Research
More informationModeling the Transport and Fate of Sediments Released from Dredging Projects in the Coastal Waters of British Columbia, Canada
WEDA Dredging Summit & Expo 18 Modeling the Transport and Fate of Sediments Released from Dredging Projects in the Coastal Waters of British Columbia, Canada David B. Fissel, Yuehua (Andy) Lin and Todd
More informationGEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 2100 Main Street, Suite 150 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 USA Tel (714) 969-0800 Fax (714) 969-0820 15 February 2006 Ms. Tamara Zeier, P.E. Project Manager Project Navigator, Ltd. One
More informationNear-Surface Dispersion and Circulation in the Marmara Sea (MARMARA)
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Near-Surface Dispersion and Circulation in the Marmara Sea (MARMARA) Pierre-Marie Poulain Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia
More informationEvaluation of the hydraulic gradient at an island for low-level nuclear waste disposal
A New Focus on Groundwater Seawater Interactions (Proceedings of Symposium HS1001 at IUGG2007, Perugia, July 2007). IAHS Publ. 312, 2007. 237 Evaluation of the hydraulic gradient at an island for low-level
More informationAppendix B. Contents. Elliston instrument deployment data report. Olympic Dam Expansion Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement 2010
Project Alternatives Appendix B Contents B1 Elliston instrument deployment data report 1 Olympic Dam Expansion Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement 2010 Appendix B1 Elliston instrument deployment
More informationSand Ripple Dynamics on the Inner Shelf
Sand Ripple Dynamics on the Inner Shelf Donald N. Slinn Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-6590, Phone: (352) 392-9537 x 1431 Fax: (352) 392-3466 E-mail:
More informationEnvironmental Implications A Case Study
Grain Size Variations and Its Environmental Implications A Case Study DR PURANDARA BEKAL SCIENTIST, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY HARD ROCK REGIONAL CENTER HANUMAN NAGAR BELGAUM, KARNATAKA Particle Transport
More informationMARINE BOUNDARY-LAYER HEIGHT ESTIMATED FROM NWP MODEL OUTPUT BULGARIA
MARINE BOUNDARY-LAYER HEIGHT ESTIMATED FROM NWP MODEL OUTPUT Sven-Erik Gryning 1 and Ekaterina Batchvarova 1, 1 Wind Energy Department, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4 Roskilde, DENMARK National Institute
More informationForecast of Nearshore Wave Parameters Using MIKE-21 Spectral Wave Model
Forecast of Nearshore Wave Parameters Using MIKE-21 Spectral Wave Model Felix Jose 1 and Gregory W. Stone 2 1 Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 2 Coastal Studies
More information1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Shell recently acquired a 90% controlling interest in Petroleum Exploration Licence 39 (PEL 39) located offshore of Namibia. The Government of the Republic of Namibia holds
More informationThe Atmospheric Circulation
The Atmospheric Circulation Vertical structure of the Atmosphere http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/textbook/atmosphere/atmospheric_structure.html The global heat engine [courtesy Kevin Trenberth,
More informationOCEAN HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL
Jurnal Teknologi Pengelolaan Limbah (Journal of Waste Management Technology), ISSN 1410-9565 Volume 10 Nomor 1 Juli 2007 (Volume 10, Number 1, July, 2007) Pusat Teknologi Limbah Radioaktif (Radioactive
More informationCoastal Ocean Circulation Experiment off Senegal (COCES)
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Coastal Ocean Circulation Experiment off Senegal (COCES) Pierre-Marie Poulain Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica
More informationThe benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting
The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting Erik Andersson Slide 1 ECMWF European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Slide 1 ECMWF s global forecasting system High resolution forecast
More informationThe Ocean Floor Chapter 14. Essentials of Geology, 8e. Stan Hatfield and Ken Pinzke Southwestern Illinois College
The Ocean Floor Chapter 14 Essentials of Geology, 8e Stan Hatfield and Ken Pinzke Southwestern Illinois College The vast world ocean Earth is often referred to as the water planet 71% of Earth s surface
More informationApplying Gerris to Mixing and Sedimentation in Estuaries
Applying Gerris to Mixing and Sedimentation in Estuaries Timothy R. Keen U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, U.S.A. 4 July 2011 Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
More informationSimulating the dispersal of aging oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill with a Lagrangian approach
Simulating the dispersal of aging oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill with a Lagrangian approach Elizabeth W. North 1, E. Eric Adams 2, Zachary Schlag 1, Christopher R. Sherwood 3, Rouying He 4, Kyung
More informationFluid-Mud Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Tilje Formation, Offshore Mid-Norway By Aitor A. Ichaso and Robert W. Dalrymple 1
Fluid-Mud Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Tilje Formation, Offshore Mid-Norway By Aitor A. Ichaso and Robert W. Dalrymple 1 Search and Discovery Article #50107 (2008) Posted August 10, 2008 *Adapted from
More informationVariability and trend of the heat balance in the southeast Indian Ocean
Variability and trend of the heat balance in the southeast Indian Ocean Ming Feng, CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research Arne Biastoch, Claus Böning, Leibniz-Institut für Meeresforschung Nick Caputi, Department
More informationAquatic Transfer Facility (ATF) San Pablo Bay (SPB) Proposed Region of ATF. Proposed Seabed Pipeline
Aquatic Transfer Facility (ATF) San Pablo Bay (SPB) Proposed Region of ATF Proposed Seabed Pipeline Technical Studies An Overview Scope: Provide background and new scientific information and analysis for
More informationEnvironmental impact assessment study of the new offshore dumping sites for Šventoji port in Lithuania
Environmental impact assessment study of the new offshore dumping sites for Šventoji port in Lithuania Introduction Summary In 2003 Lithuanian Ministry of Transport initiated the preparation of feasibility
More informationSeasonal variations of vertical structure in the deep waters of the Southern Caspian Sea
278 Research in Marine Sciences Volume 3, Issue 1, 2018 Pages 278-286 Seasonal variations of vertical structure in the deep waters of the Southern Caspian Sea Somayeh Nahavandian 1,*, and Alireza Vasel
More informationInteractions between water, ice and sediment during spring breakup at the mouth of the Mackenzie River, Northwest Territories
Interactions between water, ice and sediment during spring breakup at the mouth of the Mackenzie River, Northwest Territories Steven M. Solomon 1, Donald L. Forbes 1, Maxime Belanger 2, Dustin Whalen 1,
More informationHydrodynamic Forces due to Orbital Stokes 5 th Order Waves on Subsea Pipelines Resting on Porous Seabed
Hydrodynamic Forces due to Orbital Stokes 5 th Order Waves on Subsea Pipelines Resting on Porous Seabed Annelise Karreman Dr Jeremy Leggoe School of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering W/Prof Liang Cheng
More informationActual bathymetry (with vertical exaggeration) Geometry of the ocean 1/17/2018. Patterns and observations? Patterns and observations?
Patterns and observations? Patterns and observations? Observations? Patterns? Observations? Patterns? Geometry of the ocean Actual bathymetry (with vertical exaggeration) Continental Continental Basin
More informationNumerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow in Volcanic Eruption Clouds
Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow in Volcanic Eruption Clouds Project Representative Takehiro Koyaguchi Authors Yujiro Suzuki Takehiro Koyaguchi Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo
More informationICE DRIFT IN THE FRAM STRAIT FROM ENVISAT ASAR DATA
ICE DRIFT IN THE FRAM STRAIT FROM ENVISAT ASAR DATA Stein Sandven (1), Kjell Kloster (1), and Knut F. Dagestad (1) (1) Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NERSC), Thormøhlensgte 47, N-5006
More informationProject No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA
Project No. 432301 India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA Numerical Modelling Studies 04 th June 2018 For Build Inc. Report Title: India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA
More informationWinds and Global Circulation
Winds and Global Circulation Atmospheric Pressure Winds Global Wind and Pressure Patterns Oceans and Ocean Currents El Nino How is Energy Transported to its escape zones? Both atmospheric and ocean transport
More informationAppendix G.18 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Potential Impacts of the Marine Structures on the Hydrodynamics and Sedimentation
Appendix G.18 Hatch Report Pacific NorthWest LNG Lelu Island LNG Potential Impacts of the Marine Structures on the Hydrodynamics and Sedimentation Patterns Project Memo H345670 To: Capt. David Kyle From:
More informationWeather & Ocean Currents
Weather & Ocean Currents Earth is heated unevenly Causes: Earth is round Earth is tilted on an axis Earth s orbit is eliptical Effects: Convection = vertical circular currents caused by temperature differences
More informationWorkshop and Conference on Biogeochemical Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Changes on Marine Ecosystems November 2009
2066-12 Workshop and Conference on Biogeochemical Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Changes on Marine Ecosystems 2-10 November 2009 Nutrient cycling in the Mekong River plume M. Voss IOW Germany Nutrient
More informationMeteorological and Dispersion Modelling Using TAPM for Wagerup
Meteorological and Dispersion Modelling Using TAPM for Wagerup Phase 1: Meteorology Appendix A: Additional modelling details Prepared for: Alcoa World Alumina Australia, P. O. Box 252, Applecross, Western
More informationLecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 13 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens
Lecture Outlines PowerPoint Chapter 13 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors
More informationPTM: A Lagrangian Particle Tracking Model. Joseph Gailani
PTM: A Lagrangian Particle Tracking Model Joseph Gailani Joe.Z.Gailani@usace.army.mil OUTLINE Motivation for sediment/constituent modeling system Objectives of modeling system Description of PTM PTM Example
More informationLong term in situ observations on typhoon triggered turbidity currents (TC) in the deep sea
Long term in situ observations on typhoon triggered turbidity currents (TC) in the deep sea Article in Geology June 2018 Yanwei Zhang1*, Zhifei Liu1, Yulong Zhao1, Christophe Colin2, Xiaodong Zhang1, Meng
More informationMineral Resource Estimate Comparison at 3 g/t Au cut-off
HARTE GOLD CORP. 8 King Street East, Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1B5 Tel: 416-368-0999 Fax: 416-368-5146 Harte Gold Announces 2018 Drilling Increases Indicated Mineral Resources by 55% Overall Resource
More informationA Study on Residual Flow in the Gulf of Tongking
Journal of Oceanography, Vol. 56, pp. 59 to 68. 2000 A Study on Residual Flow in the Gulf of Tongking DINH-VAN MANH 1 and TETSUO YANAGI 2 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ehime University,
More informationSW Florida Escarpment Mapping Area
Overview NOAA s Okeanos Explorer (EX) Program plans to conduct systematic mapping and telepresence-enabled ROV explorations in the Gulf of Mexico during Spring 2014. In 2011, the EX conducted mapping operations
More informationWeather, Air Masses, Fronts and Global Wind Patterns. Meteorology
Weather, Air Masses, Fronts and Global Wind Patterns Meteorology Weather is what conditions of the atmosphere are over a short period of time. Climate is how the atmosphere "behaves" over long periods
More informationHELSINKI COMMISSION HELCOM MONAS 4/2002 Monitoring and Assessment Group Fourth Meeting Warnemünde, Germany, October 2002
HELSINKI COMMISSION HELCOM MONAS 4/2002 Monitoring and Assessment Group Fourth Meeting Warnemünde, Germany, 21-25 October 2002 Agenda Item X Document code: Date: Submitted by: To be filled in by the Secretariat
More informationMine Burial Studies with a Large Oscillating Water-Sediment Tunnel (LOWST)
Mine Burial Studies with a Large Oscillating Water-Sediment Tunnel (LOWST) Marcelo H. Garcia Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 205 North Mathews
More informationMeteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer
Chapter 3 Worksheet 1 Meteorology Name: Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer 1) If the maximum temperature for a particular day is 26 C and the minimum temperature is 14 C, the daily
More informationCurrent Status of COMS AMV in NMSC/KMA
Current Status of COMS AMV in NMSC/KMA Eunha Sohn, Sung-Rae Chung, Jong-Seo Park Satellite Analysis Division, NMSC/KMA soneh0431@korea.kr COMS AMV of KMA/NMSC has been produced hourly since April 1, 2011.
More informationReprint 527. Short range climate forecasting at the Hong Kong Observatory. and the application of APCN and other web site products
Reprint 527 Short range climate forecasting at the Hong Kong Observatory and the application of APCN and other web site products E.W.L. Ginn & K.K.Y. Shum Third APCN Working Group Meeting, Jeju Island,
More informationWalter M. Rusin Curriculum Vitae (October 2015)
(October 2015) Address: Oklahoma State University Department of Mathematics Stillwater, OK 74078 Office phone: (405) 744-5847 Mobile phone: (612) 245-3813 E-Mail: walter.rusin@okstate.edu Citizenship:
More informationTitle: Max-Buchner Research Assistantship Award
Title: Max-Buchner Research Assistantship Award Research Topic: Hydrodynamic Performance of Gas Oil-Sand Multiphase Production and Pipeline Transport Systems Type of Report: Final (Annual) Report Reporting
More informationNational Oceanography Centre. Research & Consultancy Report No. 36
National Oceanography Centre Research & Consultancy Report No. 36 State of the eastern North Atlantic subpolar gyre: The Extended Ellett Line Programme Annual Report No. 1 N P Holliday 1, S Cunningham
More informationSection 14.1 The Vast World Ocean This section discusses how much of Earth is covered by water and how that water is studied.
Section 14.1 The Vast World Ocean This section discusses how much of Earth is covered by water and how that water is studied. Reading Strategy Building Vocabulary As you read the section, define each term
More informationSpatial Analyses of Bowhead Whale Calls by Type of Call. Heidi Batchelor and Gerald L. D Spain. Marine Physical Laboratory
1 Spatial Analyses of Bowhead Whale Calls by Type of Call 2 3 Heidi Batchelor and Gerald L. D Spain 4 5 Marine Physical Laboratory 6 Scripps Institution of Oceanography 7 291 Rosecrans St., San Diego,
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2019 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2019 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College March 2, 2019 Summary: Dramatic flip from a mild winter to a top five coldest February on record in many locations
More informationSediment resuspension from shoaling internal solitary waves. Daniel Bourgault, Institut des sciences de la mer de Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada
Generated using V3.0 of the official AMS LATEX template journal page layout FOR AUTHOR USE ONLY, NOT FOR SUBMISSION! Sediment resuspension from shoaling internal solitary waves Daniel Bourgault, Institut
More informationCombining SES and ADCP to measure mud transport processes in tide-controlled estuaries
7 th Workshop Seabed Acoustics, Rostock, November 19/20, 2015 P06-1 Combining SES and ADCP to measure mud transport processes in tide-controlled estuaries Dr. Marius Becker Centre for Marine Sciences (MARUM),
More information