Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Transcription

1 Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan June 29, 2012

2 Waste Management Plan Prepared for: Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Pine Bluff Mill 5201 Fairfield Road Pine Bluff, AR Prepared by: GBM c & Associates 219 Brown Lane Bryant, AR June 29, 2012

3 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION WASTE GENERATING PROCESS AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION WASTE STORAGE PRACTICES WASTE TRANSPORTATION AND APPLICATION METHODS SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS LOCATION MAPS SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN Waste Application Rate Calculations Soil Analysis Application Area Map Information FIGURES Figure 1. Schematic diagram of wastewater treatment Figure 2. Topographic View of Evergreen Facility Figure 3. Aerial View of Evergreen facility Figure 4. Six application fields (Fields A-F) utilized by Evergreen Figure 5. Flood Insurance Map TABLES Table 1. Sludge storage practices and location Table 2. Sludge Waste Analytical Data Average concentration values of Evergreen s sludge sources from 2008 to Table 3. Sludge Analysis - Total plant available nitrogen (PAN), dry basis Table 4. Calculated sludge application rates Table 5. Total acres required per sludge product Table 6. Average soil characteristics for fields A, D, and E June 29, 2012 i

4 APPENDICES Appendix A Arkansas Permit No WR-4 Appendix B Land Application Soil Information Appendix C Soil and Waste Analysis Summary ( ) Appendix D Historical Analytical Data ( ) June 29, 2012 ii

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION Evergreen Packaging, Inc (Evergreen) in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, manufactures coated publication and food grade paper products and is currently permitted (State Permit No WR-4) to operate and maintain a waste disposal system for the land application of sludge wastes and process water. A copy of this permit is located in Appendix A. The sludge waste land applied include; Ash Pond Solids, Lime Mud Solids, Main Ditch Sludge, Aeration Basin Spoils, Green Liquor Dreg/Ash (50:50 mixture), and Brownstock Pulping Knots. Other sludge sources are generated by the Evergreen manufacturing process and may include unclaimed raw materials, byproducts, and waste material typically associated with the production of paper. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the wastewater treatment. The sludge management plan (Plan) covers the land application of the sludge waste, manufacturing byproducts. The Plan also documents the characteristics of the applied sludge, soil characteristics of the land application sites, and methods utilized in the application process. Evergreen s waste disposal system is operated and maintained in accordance with this Plan. June 29,

6 Figure 1. Schematic diagram of wastewater treatment. June 29,

7 2.0 WASTE GENERATING PROCESS AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION Sludge from the facility is generated from two sources: 1) the wastewater treatment system, and 2) the manufacturing process. The sludges generated from the wastewater treatment system are solids dredged from the ASB and the Main Ditch. Other sludge sources may include unclaimed raw materials, byproducts, and waste material. Annual sludge production quantities are recorded by Evergreen on monthly summary land application spreadsheets. Since 2008, Evergreen has averaged approximately 91,260 cubic yards/year land applied. Sources applied since 2008 have included a mixture of Green Liquor Dreg (GLD) and Ash, ASB Spoils, Ash Pond, and Lime Mud. Recent sludge application volumes are as follows: 2008: 91,660 cubic yards with an average consistency of 30% solids, was land applied. 2009: 99,016 cubic yards with an average consistency of 32% solids, was land applied. 2010: 83,100 cubic yards with an average consistency of 55% solids, was land applied. Evergreen s permit was modified in August 2006 to include process wastewater; however, process wastewater has not been land applied since its permit date. The permit renewal in removed the inclusion of process wastewater land application. 3.0 WASTE STORAGE PRACTICES Table 1 below explains the storage practices and locations of sludge waste generated at the Evergreen facility. June 29,

8 Table 1. Sludge storage practices and location. Ash Source Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils Green Liquor Dreg (GLD) Knots Storage Practice and Location Typically stored in one of 2 concrete lined ponds located west of the Main Ditch (Ash Ponds). Excess water decanted and returned to Main Ditch. Typically stored in one of 2 concrete lined ponds located west of the Main Ditch (Ash Ponds). Excess water decanted and returned to Main Ditch. Stockpiled along both sides of the Main Ditch. Stockpiled within Mill Facility. Typically stored on either a concrete pad surrounding the lined ponds or in a section of the ponds. Stored on the solid waste fuel pad. 4.0 WASTE TRANSPORTATION AND APPLICATION METHODS Evergreen is permitted to land apply sludge to six areas surrounding the facility. Figures 2 through 4 provide topographic and aerial views of the Evergreen facility location and show the locations of the six application fields (Fields A-F). An independent farmer under Evergreen s guidance farms the land application areas. The individual sludge sources are not combined prior to land application. The sludges are loaded in a dump truck or spreader equipment at their respective storage locations and moved directly to the land application areas. During transfer, none of the sludge is carried over public roads or on property that does not belong to Evergreen. Spreading equipment at the application areas distributes the sludge as evenly as possible. As stated in Section 2.0, each sludge source has a relatively high percent solid, minimizing runoff potential. However, runoff from the application of sludge is contained through the use of berms constructed during the application process. Berms are constructed so that runoff is not allowed to leave the application area. Each field is isolated by the installation of a perimeter berm. A minimum fifty-foot buffer zone is maintained between land application areas and land not owned by Evergreen. A one hundred-foot buffer is maintained between application areas and any creek or ponding water. Sludge is not applied during periods of standing water or during a time when rainfall is occurring or expected. After the sludge and soil has dried, the land is disked to mix the sludge and soil. June 29,

9 Figure 2. Topographic View of Evergreen Facility. June 29,

10 Figure 3. Aerial View of Evergreen facility. June 29,

11 Figure 4. Six application fields (Fields A-F) utilized by Evergreen. June 29,

12 5.0 SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS Table 2 shows a tabulation of the six existing sources that is to be land applied and the average concentration values of analyzed parameters from 2008 to The laboratory data sheets that were used to compile this data have been included in Appendix D of the application. Table 3 provides an estimate of the total sludge PAN based on the data provided in Table 2. These calculations were derived from equations provided in the Guidelines for Land Application of Municipal Sewage Sludge. In accordance with Permit 4579-WR-4 all sludge results are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual report. Sludge metals analysis results are evaluated annually for ceiling concentrations and cumulative loading. A comparison is made of the metals concentrations with the ceiling concentrations listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR as required by Permit No WR-4. Additionally, metals are evaluated along with previously land applied sludge analysis results to estimate whether cumulative loading rates are exceeded as required by Permit No WR-4. Should it be determined that either ceiling concentrations or cumulative loading rates are exceeded, land application for the acreage in question will cease. In addition to the parameters listed in Table 2, Evergreen monitors dioxin from the primary clarifier sludge for 2,3,7,8 TCDD. Results of dioxin analysis are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual reporting requirements of permit 4579-WR-4. June 29,

13 Table 2. Sludge Waste Analytical Data Average concentration values of Evergreen s sludge sources from 2008 to Parameters Ash Pond Dry Weight Basis Lime Mud Dry Weight Basis Main Ditch Dry Weight Basis ASB Spoils Dry Weight Basis 50:50 GLD/Ash Dry Weight Basis Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg TKN, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Ammonia-N, mg/kg % Solids % Volatile Solids ph (su) PCB's mg/kg * Where values were less than the Detection Limit (DL), ½ the detection value was used for calculations. June 29,

14 Table 3. Sludge Analysis - Total plant available nitrogen (PAN), dry basis. Source TKN mg/l Ammonia Nitrogen Total (mg/l) Available (mg/l) Organic Nitrogen Total (mg/l) Available (mg/l) Available Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) Total PAN* (lb/mm Gal) Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge * PAN = ((0.3 x (TKN - Ammonia)) + (0.5 x Ammonia N) + Nitrite N + Nitrate N)/ LOCATION MAPS A USGS 7.5 minute series topographic map of the Ladd quadrangle and an aerial map of the facility are provided as Figure 2 and Figure 3. The maps display information such as the facility location, approximate facility boundary, adjacent land use, and nearby receiving streams. Figures 3 and 4 also depict application area information such as legal descriptions, field locations, and boundaries. 7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The following sections discuss Evergreen s site management for each sludge waste and application areas. Site management information includes soil characteristics of the applied fields, waste application rates, suitable crops for planting, crop requirements, and total acres required for applications. Land application area information is also included in Section 7.3. In addition, sludge loadings are limited in the permit by the following: 1) plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the sludge, which cannot exceed the expected nitrogen uptake of the proposed crop that will be planted, 2) ceiling concentration limits for metals, and 3) cumulative loading rates for metals. June 29,

15 7.1 Waste Application Rate Calculations Several crops are suitable for use in Evergreen s land application areas. Each potential crop was evaluated for sludge application rates using nutrient uptake information (crop nitrogen requirement, CNR) from Table 4-11 of the Process Design Manual for Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater, USEPA, October Table 4 shows a tabulation of the resulting sludge application rates and the amount of acreage necessary for the various crops based on the PAN calculated in Table 3. Table 5 shows the total acres required for potential crops. These calculations are derived from averaged sludge waste percent solids and average tons applied of each sludge waste from 2008 to Evergreen may elect to apply sludge to fields on a rotating basis. During any non-farm years, natural grasses will be allowed to grow on the soil that is not receiving sludge. Since sludge will not be applied during years the fields are not farmed, the uptake of natural grasses has not been considered in the nutrient uptake calculations for determining acreage requirements. Table 4. Calculated sludge application rates. Crop Crop Nitrogen Requirement (lb/ac-yr) Sludge Application Rate (tons/acre-year) = Crop Nitrogen Requirement (CNR) in (lb/yr) divided by Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) in (lbs/ton of sludge) 50:50 Ash Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils Press Sludge GLD/Ash Cotton Bermuda Grass 300 1,505 1, ,046 1,037 Soybeans 223 1,118 1, Sorghum Ryegrass Fescue Corn Wheat June 29,

16 Table 5. Total acres required per sludge product Crop Ash Lime Mud Main Ditch 2,009 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 3,962 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 2,551 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate ASB Spoils 3,320 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 50:50 GLD/Ash 15,746 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate Acres Required (Existing Sources) Cotton Bermuda Grass Soybeans Sorghum Ryegrass Fescue Corn Wheat * Press Sludge has not been Land Applied. 7.2 Soil Analysis In accordance with Permit 4579-WR-4 all soil results are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual report. Table 6 shows the averaged results of the soils analysis from samples collected from 2008 to 2011 for fields A, D, and E. The remaining fields (B, C, and F) have not been applied to over the past five years and soil data is not available. Soil samples are taken from several locations across a land application field. These soil samples are then mixed and composited to make a single sample for each acre area. The portion of field E located south of the railroad track is not being utilized due to its position in the 100-year flood plain. The remaining five fields contain approximately 459 acres with about 85% (390 acres) of this amount being available for sludge waste application. Current land application areas are located outside the 100-year flood plain according to the Flood Insurance maps (Figure 5) for this area (FEMA Community Panel Number 05069C0325D dated March 16, 2009). June 29,

17 Table 6. Average soil characteristics for fields A, D, and E. Parameters Field A Field D Field E Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg < Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate as N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg Sodium mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su) June 29,

18 Figure 5. Flood Insurance Map. June 29,

19 7.3 Application Area Map Information Figure 3 and Figure 4 depict fields A, B, C, D, E, and F locations, boundaries, and legal descriptions. All land application sites are located in Jefferson County. Dominant surrounding land use consists of pasture and crop land. The Arkansas River is the nearest receiving stream. The Arkansas River levee system borders the facility to the northwest. State highway 63 borders the facility to the west and Fairfield Road borders the facility to the south. Pine Bluff, Arkansas is the nearest community and is located approximately 3.5 miles west of the facility. Soil series boundaries, soil map unit names, and soil ratings are for the application areas are provided in the Web Soil Survey figures provided in Appendix B. June 29,

20 Appendix A Arkansas Permit No WR-4

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31 Appendix B Land Application Soil Information

32 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field A) 34 14' 21'' 34 14' 7'' ' 28'' 91 54' 28'' Map Scale: 1:3,160 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Meters Feet ' 2'' 91 54' 2'' ' 21'' 34 14' 7'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 1 of 3

33 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field A) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:3,160 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 2 of 3

34 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field A Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 24 Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded 36 Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded % % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 3 of 3

35 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field B) 34 14' 49'' 34 14' 26'' ' 57'' 91 55' 57'' Map Scale: 1:3,420 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Meters Feet ' 36'' 91 55' 36'' ' 49'' 34 14' 25'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

36 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field B) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam McGehee silt loam Portland clay Roxana silt loam Yorktown silty clay Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:3,420 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

37 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field B Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam % 22 McGehee silt loam McGehee silt loam % 30 Portland clay Portland clay % 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam % 51 Yorktown silty clay Yorktown silty clay % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

38 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field C) 34 13' 37'' 34 13' 8'' ' 51'' 91 55' 50'' Okeefe Rd Map Scale: 1:6,440 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters Paper Mill Rd ,400 2,100 Feet Fairfield Rd ' 57'' 91 54' 58'' ' 36'' 34 13' 7'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

39 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field C) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Hebert silt loam Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Roxana silt loam Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:6,440 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

40 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field C Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 19 Hebert silt loam Hebert silt loam % 33 Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes % 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

41 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field D) 34 14' 9'' 34 13' 22'' ' 18'' 91 56' 18'' Paper Mill Rd Map Scale: 1:10,300 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Paper Mill Rd Meters Andrews Rd Okeefe Rd ,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ' 54'' 91 54' 53'' ' 8'' 34 13' 21'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

42 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field D) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam Hebert silt loam Perry clay Portland clay Roxana silt loam Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:10,300 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

43 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field D Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam % 19 Hebert silt loam Hebert silt loam % 26 Perry clay Perry clay % 30 Portland clay Portland clay % 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

44 Celia Rd Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field E) 34 13' 20'' 34 12' 48'' ' 10'' 91 54' 10'' Fairfield Rd Map Scale: 1:4,770 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters Feet ' 41'' 91 53' 41'' ' 20'' 34 12' 47'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 1 of 3

45 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field E) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Portland clay Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Roxana silt loam Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:4,770 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 2 of 3

46 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field E Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 30 Portland clay Portland clay % 33 Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes % 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam % 49 Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 3 of 3

47 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field F) 34 13' 56'' 34 13' 32'' ' 22'' 91 55' 22'' Paper Mill Rd Map Scale: 1:5,260 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet Meters ,000 1, Feet ' 38'' ' 39'' ' 56'' 34 13' 32'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

48 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field F) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam Roxana silt loam Water Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:5,260 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

49 Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field F Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam % 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam % 52 Water Water % Totals for Area of Interest % Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

50 Appendix C Soil and Waste Analysis Summary ( )

51 Average Soil Characteristics for Fields A-F Parameter Concentration (mg/kg) Concentration (lb/ton) Fields A (44 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg < 0.10 < Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg 1, Selenium, mg/kg Sodium mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1, ph (su) Fields D (118 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg < 0.10 < Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg 1, Selenium, mg/kg Sodium mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su) Fields E (64 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg 0.1 < Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg Sodium mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su)

52 Evergreen Packaging Inc Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg 1.1 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg < < < Molybdenum, mg/kg < < < Nickel, mg/kg *Nitrate as N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg Sodium, mmhos/cm Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g % Solids Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su) *reported as Nitrates Did not apply Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg <5 2.5 Did not apply <5 2.5 <5 2.5 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg < < < Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg <4 2.0 < Mercury, mg/kg < < < Molybdenum, mg/kg < < < Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate as N, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg < < < Sodium, mmhos/cm Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g % Solids Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su)

53 Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg <5 2.5 Did not apply <5 2.5 <5 2.5 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg < < < Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg < < < Molybdenum, mg/kg < < < Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate as N, mg/kg 8.5 < Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg < < < Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g ph Specific Conductance (µs/cm) Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg < Did not apply < < Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg < Mercury, mg/kg < < < Molybdenum, mg/kg < < < Nickel, mg/kg Nitrate as N, mg/kg < < Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg < < < Zinc, mg/kg CEC, mg-eq/100g ph Specific Conductance (µs/cm)

54 Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg TKN, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Ammonia-N, mg/kg % Solids % Volatile Solids ph (su) PCB's mg/kg Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg TKN, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Ammonia-N, mg/kg % Solids % Volatile Solids ph (su) PCB's mg/kg

55 Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg TKN, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Ammonia-N, mg/kg % Solids % Volatile Solids ph (su) PCB's mg/kg Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg Cadmium, mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Copper, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg Mercury, mg/kg Molybdenum, mg/kg Nickel, mg/kg Zinc, mg/kg Selenium, mg/kg TKN, mg/kg Phosphorus, mg/kg Potassium, mg/kg Nitrate-N, mg/kg Ammonia-N, mg/kg % Solids % Volatile Solids ph (su) PCB's mg/kg

56 Evergreen Packaging Cubic Yards per Year (wet) Data Pulled from Land App - BeneficialUse.xls in each year's Annual Report Folder Year CY (Cubic Yards) Applied* Ash Lime Main Ditch ASB GLD/Ash ,472 2,628 31, , ,880 5,880 13,300 41,080 Average 5,880 5,880 5,472 7,964 45,532 Average (tons) 5,994 5,994 5,578 8,118 46,414 * Used CY = Tons * Location % Solids CY/yr (wet) Ton/yr (wet) Gallon/yr (wet) CY/yr (dry) Tons/yr (dry) Ash 33.5% 5,880 5,994 1,187,760 1,971 2,009 Lime Mud 66.1% 5,880 5,994 1,187,760 3,887 3,962 Main Ditch 45.7% 5,472 5,578 1,105,344 2,502 2,551 ASB Spoils 40.9% 7,964 8,118 1,608,728 3,257 3,320 GLD/Ash 33.9% 45,532 46,414 9,197,397 15,447 15,746

57 Appendix D Historical Analytical Data ( )

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172 Blevins, Terri From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Ungerank, Ralph Tuesday, July 03, :11 AM Blevins, Terri 4579-WR-5 Revised WMP Revised_WMP_ pdf Can you put this on the web? Colby Ungerank Engineer ADEQ, Water Division 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, AR