TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM June 16, 2011

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM June 16, 2011"

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM June 16, 2011 Tier 1 Remedial Investigation Results and Tier 2 Sampling Plan Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant To: Mr. Henry Chui, Department of Toxics Substances Control From: Terra Pacific Group on behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Date: June 16, 2011 Terra Pacific Group (TPG), on behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), has prepared this Technical Memorandum to summarize the results of the Tier 1 Remedial Investigation (RI) conducted at the former Salinas manufactured gas plant (MGP) site in (Figure 1). This Technical Memorandum also presents the proposed Tier 2 sampling plan. A complete discussion of the nature and extent of impact will be included in the RI report to be prepared following the completion of all tiered phases of investigation. The Tier 1 soil sampling activities were conducted in January 2011 in accordance with the RI Workplan dated December 15, 2010 (TPG, 2010), which was approved by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and pursuant to the Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) (Docket No. HSA-VCA 09/10-105) established between PG&E and the DTSC. Detailed background information including the site s history, past and current usage, hydrogeology, and surrounding land use are presented in the RI Workplan (TPG, 2010). The following section presents a brief summary of the Tier 1 results. 1.0 SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SAMPLING ACTIVITIES Between January 11 and 19, 2011, a total of 45 soil borings were drilled to depths ranging from 1.5 to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs) using a hand auger and direct-push geoprobe drill rig. Five of the borings, designated by an A or B after the boring number (e.g., P-16A), were step-out borings drilled due to refusal before reaching the target depth at the original location. Two borings, P-39 and P-40, were added to the proposed scope of work to further define the extent of visibly impacted soil encountered in the southern part of the Chevron property. Of the 45 borings completed, 26 were drilled on the Chevron property (former Unocal bulk plant), 7 were drilled on the California Water Service Company (CWS) property, 3 were drilled on the PG&E property (regulator station), and 9 were drilled within the public right-of-way on Bridge Alley, Market Way, and Bridge Street. All planned borings were drilled within close proximity to the locations specified in the workplan. Minor adjustments were made to the proposed locations due to the presence of utilities or other subsurface obstructions. The final Tier 1 boring locations are shown on the site plan in Figure SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soils beneath the site consist of artificial fill overlying alluvial deposits primarily composed of clay with subordinate interbeds of silt and fine-grained sand. Fill materials vary in thickness and composition and are characterized by debris consisting of fragments of red brick, concrete, wood, and metal. With few exceptions, the fill was generally 3 to 6 feet deep. In boring Page 1 of 6

2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant June 16, 2011 P-32B, drilled on the CWS property (Figure 2), well-graded sand with concrete and brick debris was encountered to a depth of 10 feet bgs. In boring P-17, poorly and well graded sands with concrete, brick, metal and wood debris was encountered to a depth of approximately 10.5 feet where a concrete obstruction was encountered. Concrete was encountered in boring P-16 at a depth of 8 feet. In boring P-40, an abundance of wood debris was observed between 4 and 5.5 feet bgs. A void space was encountered below the wood debris between 5.5 and 8 feet bgs below which native lean clay was observed. Groundwater, which is estimated to occur at a depth of approximately 40 feet, was not encountered in any of the borings drilled. 1.2 SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the soil samples collected and the corresponding analytical tests that were performed. As shown in Table 1, the majority of the samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), quantified in the gasoline (), diesel (TPHd), and motor oil ranges (TPHmo), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), and for arsenic and lead. Select samples collected from visibly impacted intervals were also tested for the full list of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Title 22 metals, and total cyanide. The analytical results are summarized in Tables 2 through 6 and the sampling locations are shown on the site plan in Figure 2. The distribution of the select constituents analyzed is illustrated on the site plan in Plate 1. The select constituents listed include, TPHd, TPHmo, carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (C) expressed in benzo(a)pyrene [B(a)P] equivalent concentrations, benzene, naphthalene, arsenic and lead. 2.0 PROPOSED TIER 2 SOIL AND SOIL GAS SAMPLING PROGRAM The proposed Tier 2 investigation will focus on evaluating potential impacts from former MGP structures located on the Alvarez property. Additional sampling on the Chevron property to fill data gaps, and the installation of soil gas probes near key structures throughout the former MGP site will also be performed. In addition, borings will be drilled on Market Way and Bridge Alley to evaluate the lateral extent of impacts encountered in Tier 1. The following sections present an overview of the Tier 2 sampling program. The proposed sampling locations are shown in Figure 3 and Plate 1. The sampling rationale is presented in Tables 7 and 8. The sampling activities will be performed in accordance with the field procedures presented in the December 15, 2010 RI Workplan. 2.1 TIER 2 SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM Tier 2 soil sampling will be conducted to investigate potential MGP-related impacts associated with former MGP features located on the Alvarez property including the underground oil tanks, lampblack separators, retorts, scrubbers, purifiers and gas holder. Additional soil sampling will also be conducted on properties previously investigated in Tier 1. To investigate these areas, a total of 31 soil borings will be drilled to depths ranging from 5 to 35 feet at the approximate locations shown in Figure 3 and Plate 1. The boring locations may be adjusted in the field based on the conditions encountered (e.g., underground obstructions, utilities, refusal, etc.). Soil samples will be collected Page 2 of 6

3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant June 16, 2011 from the most visibly impacted zones, if present. The proposed sampling depths and rationale, which are based on known historical information and results of the Tier 1 investigation, are presented in Table 7. Of the 31 soil borings proposed, 12 will be completed as multi-depth soil gas wells as discussed in Section 2.2. At locations where soil containing MGP residue (e.g. lampblack) is observed, additional step-out borings may be drilled. The need for step-out borings will be determined by the field engineer or geologist. Factors determining the need for and location of a step-out boring include: 1) the distance to the next closest sampling location, 2) the anticipated size of the former feature being investigated, and 3) the nature of the impacted material encountered. The proposed sample depths may be adjusted or additional samples may be collected and analyzed based on the field conditions encountered. In addition, the target boring depths may be extended to achieve vertical delineation of observed impacts. 2.2 TIER 2 SOIL GAS SAMPLING A soil gas survey consisting of the installation of 25 multi-depth soil gas wells (each with two probes for a total of 50 soil gas sampling points) will be performed to evaluate the potential presence of vapor-phase organic compounds in subsurface soils. The soil gas wells will be placed throughout the site as shown in Figure 3 and Plate 1. The soil gas well locations were selected to target impacted areas on the Chevron, CWS, and PG&E properties based on the Tier 1 results and potential source areas on the Alvarez property. This includes 9 locations on the Chevron Property (SG-1 through SG-9), 11 locations on the Alvarez property (SG-10 to SG-12, SG-14 to SG-16; SG- 18 to SG-20; SG-22 and SG-23), 1 location on the PG&E regulator station (SG-21), and 2 locations on the CWS property (SG-24 and SG-25). Soil gas wells SG-13 and SG-17 will be installed on Bridge Alley and Bridge Street, respectively. SG-13 will be used to evaluate potential impacts associated with high B(a)P and naphthalene concentrations detected in boring P-23. SG-17 will be installed to evaluate impacts detected in boring P-26 and to evaluate soil gas conditions along the west side of the existing auto service building. The soil gas wells will be constructed and sampled according to the procedures outlined in the December 15, 2010 Remedial Investigation Workplan except that the target depth for the deep probes will be 15 feet rather than 10 feet. Table 8 presents a summary of the target soil gas probe depths and rationale associated with the proposed location of each soil gas well. 3.0 TENTATIVE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Pre-field activities (utility clearance, permitting, etc.) will be initiated within four weeks of receiving DTSC approval of this Technical Memorandum. Upon completion of the pre-field activities, the Tier 2 investigation will be performed and completed over a three-week period. The DTSC will receive at least 7 days advanced notice before initiating the Tier 2 field activities. Following the completion of the Tier 2 investigation, a second inter-tier memorandum will be prepared which includes the Tier 2 results and a recommended scope of work for Tier 3 if deemed Page 3 of 6

4 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant June 16, 2011 necessary. If Tier 3 investigation is not warranted, the RI Report will be prepared following receipt of all Tier 2 investigation results. 4.0 REFERENCES Terra Pacific Group, 2010, Remedial Investigation Workplan, Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant, 2 Bridge Street, : Project No. PGE , dated December 15, 2010, 30 p. Page 4 of 6

5 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant June 16, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND SIGNATURE The Tier 1 Technical Memorandum presented herein was prepared by Terra Pacific Group Incorporated on behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All work was performed by or under the direct supervision of the undersigned professionals. Raul A. Briones, PG, Project Manager Max Reyhani, PE, Principal-in-Charge Page 5 of 6

6 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Former Salinas Manufactured Gas Plant June 16, 2011 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil 4 Summary of Arsenic, Lead, and Cyanide in Soil 5 Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil 6 Summary of Metals in Soil 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title 1 Site Location Map 2 Tier 1 Sampling Locations 3 Proposed Tier 2 Sampling Locations LIST OF PLATES Plate No. Title 1 Summary of Select Constituents in Soil Page 6 of 6

7 TABLES

8 Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary Boring Number P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P /11/ X X X X X X X - - X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X - - X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X P /11/ X X X X X X X - - X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X X - - P-8-2.5A 1/11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 1 of 7

9 Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary Boring Number P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X X X X X X X P /11/ X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X - - X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X - X - - X X X Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 2 of 7

10 Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary Boring Number P-16A P-17 P-18 P-19 P-20 P-21 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P-16A-1.0 1/12/ X X X X X X X P-16A-3.0 1/12/ X X X X X X X P-16A-5.0 1/12/ X X X X X X X P-16A-6.5 1/13/ X X X X X X X P-16A /13/ X X X X X P-16A /13/ X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X X - X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /12/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X - - Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 3 of 7

11 Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary Boring Number P-22 P-23 P-24 P-25 P-26 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P /13/ X X X X X X X X - - P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X - - P /13/ X X X X X X X X - X P /13/ X X X X X X X X - X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 4 of 7

12 Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary Boring Number P-27 P-28 P-29 P-30 P-31 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X X X X - - P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X X - - P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /19/ X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X - - X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 5 of 7

13 Boring Number Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) P /13/ X X X X X X X P-32 P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X - X X X P-32A P-32A-3.0 1/17/ P-32B-6.0 1/17/ X X X X X X X P-32B P-32B-9.5 1/17/ X X X X X P-32B /17/ X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P-33 P /13/ X X X X X X X P /13/ X X X X X X X P-34 P /13/ X X X X X X X - - X P-34A-1.0 1/13/ X X X X X X X P-34A P-34A-3.0 1/14/ X X X X X X X P-34A-5.0 1/14/ X X X X X X X P-35 P /14/ X X X X X X X X - X P-35A-0.5 1/18/ X X X X X X X P-35A-2.5 1/18/ X X X X X X X P-35A-4.0 1/18/ X X X X X X X P-35A P-35A-5.0 1/18/ X X X X X X X P-35A-6.0 1/18/ X X X X X X X P-35A /18/ X X X X X P-35A /18/ X X X X X P-35A /18/ X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P-36 P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X - X P /14/ X X - X P /14/ X X - X VOCs (8260B) Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 6 of 7

14 Boring Number P-37 P-38 P-39 P-40 Number Date Depth (feet) (8260B) Table 1 Tier 1 Soil Summary TPHd (8015) TPHmo (8015) BTEX (8260B) Analytical Test (EPA Method) (8270SIM) Lead (6010B) Arsenic (6010B) Total Cyanide (9010/9014) VOCs (8260B) P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X - X P /14/ X X - X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /14/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /18/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X X X X - - P /17/ X X X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X X X X - - P /17/ X X X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X P /17/ X X X X X Notes: = Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline TPHd = Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel TPHmo = Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil BTEX = Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzne, and xylenes = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons VOCs = Volatile organic compounds Title 22 Metals (6010/7471) Page 7 of 7

15 Table 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds No. Depth TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethylbenzene Date Benzene Toluene o-xylene p/m-xylene Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P /11/11 1 < < < < <0.002 P /11/11 3 <0.05 <5.0 <25 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/11 1 < <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/11 3 <0.05 <5.0 <25 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/11 5 <0.041 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/ < <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/11 3 < < < < < <0.002 P /11/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/ < < < < P /11/ < < < <0.002 P /11/11 5 <0.046 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /11/ ,400 3, <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/ < , < < < P /11/11 3 < < < < < P /11/11 5 <0.046 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/11 1 < , < < < < P /11/11 3 < < < < < P /11/11 5 <0.05 <5.0 < < < < <0.002 P /11/ <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/ < < < < P /11/11 5 <0.046 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/11 1 < < < < <0.002 P /11/ < , <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 < P-8-2.5A 01/11/ <50 110, ,000 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 P /11/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/11 1 < < < < < < P /11/11 3 <0.047 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/11 5 <0.047 <5.0 < < < < < P /11/ , <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /11/ < < < < P /11/11 3 <0.049 <5.0 < < < < <0.002 P /11/11 5 <0.054 <5.0 < < < < < P /12/11 1 < < < < < P /12/11 3 <0.06 <5.0 < < < < < P /12/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /12/11 10 <0.5 <5.0 <25 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /12/ ,100 6,600 2, < <0.54 <1.1 P /12/ < , < < < < P /12/ < < < < < P /12/ , < < < < P /12/ , < < < Page 1 of 5

16 No. Date Table 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Depth TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethylbenzene Benzene Toluene o-xylene p/m-xylene Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P /12/ <25 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /12/ < < < < P /12/ < < < < P /12/11 5 < < < < <0.002 P /12/ , <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /12/ < < < < P /12/ <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /12/ < < P /12/ , <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.22 P /12/ <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /12/11 3 < ,300 4, < < < < P /12/11 5 < ,400 4, < < < < P /12/ ,100 3, < < < < P /12/ <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 < P /12/ < < < < P /13/11 6 1,000 2,800 3, P-16A /12/ < < < < P-16A /12/ < < < < < P-16A /12/ <5.0 < < < < < P-16A /13/ < <0.053 <0.053 <0.053 <0.11 P-16A /13/ <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 P-16A /13/ <0.5 <5.0 <25 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /12/ , P /12/ ,000 14, < < < < P /12/ <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /12/ < <2.5 <2.5 P /12/ < < < < P /12/11 3 <0.05 <5.0 < <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /12/11 5 < < < < < P /12/ < < < < P /12/11 3 < < < < < P /12/ < < < <0.002 P /13/ , < P /13/ <5.0 < < < < P /13/11 5 <0.047 <5.0 < < < < < P /13/ <0.072 <0.072 <0.072 <0.072 <0.14 P /13/11 30 <0.047 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /13/ ,100 2, P /13/ < P /13/11 5 < , < < < P /13/ ,300 3,700 <0.058 <0.058 <0.058 <0.058 <0.12 P /13/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1. Page 2 of 5

17 No. Date Table 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Depth TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethylbenzene Benzene Toluene o-xylene p/m-xylene Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P /13/ , < P /13/ <1 < P /13/ ,000 25, P /13/ < < P /13/ < < < < P /13/ < < P /13/ ,500 3, P /13/ ,800 25,000 11,000 < < P /13/ ,700 8, < P /13/ ,300 8,100 <0.066 <0.066 <0.066 <0.066 <0.13 P /13/ ,300 94,000 67, P /13/ ,200 4,700 3, P /13/ ,300 7,200 4, < P /13/ <2 < P /18/11 1 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 3 <0.052 <5.0 < <0.001 <0.001 < P /18/11 5 <0.056 <5.0 < < < < P /18/ ,800 4,900 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.22 P /18/ ,300 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.1 P /18/ <0.05 <5.0 <25 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /18/11 1 < <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /18/11 3 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 5 <0.045 <5.0 < < < < P /18/ ,900 3,100 <0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.097 P /18/ ,600 3,600 <0.051 <0.051 <0.051 <0.051 <0.1 P /18/11 29 <0.041 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /19/ < < < < P /19/11 3 <0.052 <5.0 < <0.001 <0.001 < P /19/11 5 <0.04 <5.0 < < < < P /19/ ,800 2,300 <0.068 <0.068 <0.068 <0.068 <0.14 P /19/ < < <0.002 P /19/ <0.042 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/ < < < < <0.002 P /18/11 3 <0.047 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 5 <0.045 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 9 < ,800 6, < < < P /18/ <5.0 < < < <0.002 P /18/ <0.041 <5.0 < < < < < P /19/ < < < P /19/11 3 < < < < < P /19/ ,900 3, < < < < P /19/ ,900 7,900 <0.085 <0.085 <0.085 <0.085 <0.17. Page 3 of 5

18 No. Date Table 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Depth TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethylbenzene Benzene Toluene o-xylene p/m-xylene Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P /19/ ,100 5,300 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.1 P /19/ ,700 6,600 <0.053 <0.053 <0.053 <0.053 <0.11 P /19/ ,300 1,700 <0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.095 P /19/ ,900 4,900 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.052 <0.1 P /18/ < < < < P /18/11 3 <0.049 <5.0 < < < <0.002 P /18/11 5 <0.046 <5.0 < < < < P /18/ < < < P /18/ <5.0 < < < P /18/ <5.0 < < < < < P /18/ <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 1 <0.044 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/11 3 <0.045 <5.0 < < < < P /18/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < P /19/11 10 <0.05 <5.0 < <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /19/11 18 <0.054 <5.0 < < < < P /13/ , < < < P /13/ ,900 3, < < < P /13/11 5 <0.048 <5.0 < < < < P /14/ <0.5 <5.0 <25 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 P /13/ < < < P /13/ < < <0.002 P /13/ < < < P /14/ ,200 5, P-32B /17/11 6 < < < < < P-32B /17/ ,800 5,000 < <0.001 <0.001 < P-32B /17/ <5.0 < < < P /13/ < < < P /13/11 3 < < < < < P /13/11 5 <0.045 <5.0 < < < < P /13/ , <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P-34A /13/ < < < < P-34A /14/ <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P-34A /14/11 5 <0.056 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /14/11 1 < < < < < P-35A /18/ <0.001 < P-35A /18/ <0.046 <5.0 < < < < < P-35A /18/11 4 < < < < < P-35A /18/11 5 <0.042 <5.0 < < < < P-35A /18/ <0.052 < P-35A /18/ ,000 3,000 <0.051 <0.051 <0.051 <0.051 <0.1 P-35A /18/ < Page 4 of 5

19 No. Date Table 2 Summary of TPH and BTEX in Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds Depth TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethylbenzene Benzene Toluene o-xylene p/m-xylene Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P-35A /18/ <5.0 < < < < P /14/ < < <0.002 P /14/11 3 < , < < < < P /14/11 5 <0.05 <5.0 < <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 P /14/ P /14/ <5.0 < P /14/ <5.0 < P /14/ < ,600 5, < < < < P /14/11 3 < ,000 4,400 < < < < < P /14/ < < < P /14/ P /14/ , P /14/ < < < P /14/11 3 <0.049 <5.0 <25 < < < < <0.002 P /14/11 5 <0.041 <5.0 < < < < < P /18/ ,000 3,000 <0.054 <0.054 <0.054 <0.054 <0.11 P /18/ ,700 1,700 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.099 P /18/11 29 <0.054 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /17/ P /17/ < < P /17/ <5.0 < < < < P /17/ <0.092 <0.092 <0.092 <0.092 <0.18 P /17/ <5.0 <25 <0.051 < P /17/11 34 <0.042 <5.0 <25 < < < < < P /17/ < < < <0.002 P /17/ <0.001 <0.001 < P /17/ < < < P /17/ <5.0 < P /17/ P /17/ ,600 6,600 4, Notes: "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory reporting limit (RL) "---" = Not analyzed. Page 5 of 5

20 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. P P P P P P P P P P P P Depth (ft bgs) Date d 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene 0.11 < < < < < J < < J < Acenaphthylene 0.59 < < J < < < < Anthracene 0.52 < < < < < < < Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene J J J J < Fluoranthene J J J J < Fluorene 0.15 < < J < < < < < Phenanthrene 3.6 < J J J J J < Pyrene J J < Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene J J J J J < Benzo (a) Pyrene J J J J < Benzo (b) Fluoranthene J J J J < Benzo (k) Fluoranthene 4.1 < J J < J J < Chrysene 4.2 < J < J < Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene 0.83 < < J < < J < Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene 4.7 < J J J J < Naphthalene 0.66 < < J J J J < BaP Equivalent Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 1 of 17

21 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 < J < J < < < J < J < J < < J J J J < J < D J < J J < < < < J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 2 of 17

22 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P-8-2.5A P P P P P P P P P P P A /11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/11/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 <0.13 < <0.025 < < J J < < J < < <0.060 < J < < < < < <0.15 < J < < < < < < J J 0.67 < J J J J J J 0.16 J < J < < < < J < < < J J J 0.20 < J J J J J < J J J J J 0.70 < J J J J J 0.44 J < J J J J J 0.28 J < < J J 1.2 < J 2.7 < J J J 1 < J <0.067 < < < < < J 0.38 J < J J J 0.65 < J 0.11 J < < < J J < J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 3 of 17

23 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 < < J < J < J < < < J J < < J J < < < J < J J J J D J 0.22 < J < J < < < J J < J J J J J J J 0.42 < J J 0.44 < J 0.29 < < J J J < J J J J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 4 of 17

24 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P-16A-1.0 P-16A /12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/13/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 < J 0.23 J 0.13 J J J J < < < J J < J J J < J J J < J < J J J < J J J < < J J < Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 5 of 17

25 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P-16A-5.0 P-16A-6.5 P-16A-20.0 P-16A-34.5 P P P P P P P P /12/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/11 1/12/ J < < < < < J < < J J J J J 0.55 < < < < J J < J J 0.69 < < J J < < < J < < J J < J J J < J 0.88 < < J J J 1.5 D < < J 0.75 < < J 0.78 < < J J 0.87 < < J < < < J J J J J 0.54 < < < J J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 6 of 17

26 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /12/11 1/12/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/ J J 0.19 J < < < < J 0.13 J < J J J < < J < < J < J J < J < < J < J J J J J < < J < < < J 0.19 < < < < J < < J J < < J J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 7 of 17

27 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/ J < J D J J J D J J J J ,000 1, Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 8 of 17

28 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /13/11 1/13/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/ < < < J < < < < < < < < < < < J J < < < < < J < < J J < < J < < J J J < J J 0.20 < J < < < < < < < < < < J < < < < < < J < J < < J 0.25 < J J < < J J 0.29 < J J < < J J 0.55 < J J < < J J 0.38 < J < < < < < < J J < < < < < J J 0.23 J < < < J < < < < < J J < < J < < < J J < < < J < J < < J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 9 of 17

29 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /18/11 1/18/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/ < < < < < < < < J < < < < < < < < < J J < < < < < < < J < < J J < < < < < < J < < < J < < < < J J < < < < < J D < < < < J < < < < J < < < < < J < < < < < < < < < < < J < < < < J J < < < < < < Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 10 of 17

30 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /18/11 1/18/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < J J 1.9 < J < < < < J J J < < < < < < J < < J J J < < < < < J J < < < < J < < < < < J < J < < < < < J J J < < < < < J J J < < < < < < < < < < < < < J J J < < < < < < < < < < < < < < J J 1.7 < J J J 0.14 < < < < J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 11 of 17

31 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/19/11 1/19/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 < J < < < J < < < < J < J < < < J J < < < J < < < < < < < < J < J < J J J J < J < J J J < J < < < < < < < J < J < J J < < J < D J J J J < J < J J J J J < J < J J J < J < J < J J J < J < J < J J < < J < J < J J < < < < J < J J < < < J < J < J J J < J J < < J < Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 12 of 17

32 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P-32B-6.0 P-32B-9.5 P-32B-19.0 P P P /13/11 1/14/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/14/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 1/13/11 < < < < J 0.36 J < <0.050 < <0.050 < < J < < J < J J < < < < < < J < J 0.14 < J J J J < < < J J 0.29 < J < < J J J J 0.17 < J J J < J < J < J < J < J < J < < < J < < < J J < < J < < < < J < J J < < J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 13 of 17

33 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P-34A-1.0 P-34A-3.0 P-34A-5.0 P P-35A-0.5 P-35A-4.0 P-35A-5.0 P-35A-6.0 P-35A-16.0 P-35A-2.5 P-35A /13/11 1/13/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/ J < < J < J < < J J J J J < < J J J J < J J J J J < < J J < < J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 14 of 17

34 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P-35A-29.5 P P P P P P P P P P P /18/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/14/ J J < J <0.25 < < J J < < < < < J 0.55 < < < J J J 120D < J < J J < < J J < J 3.3 < J < J 0.83 < J < J 1 < J < J 0.57 < < < < < < < J 0.97 < < < < < < J < J 0.44 < < J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 15 of 17

35 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P /14/11 1/14/11 1/14/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/18/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/ < < < J J < J < J < < < J < < J < < < < < < < J J < < < J J J < J < < < < < < < J < J < J < < J 0.10 < < J < J J < < J < J < < J < J < < J < J J < < J < J < < J < < < J < < J < J J < < J < J J J < Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 16 of 17

36 Table 3 Summary of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil No. Depth (ft bgs) Date d Non-Carcinogenic Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene Fluoranthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Carcinogenic Benzo (a) Anthracene Benzo (a) Pyrene Benzo (b) Fluoranthene Benzo (k) Fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) Anthracene Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) Pyrene Naphthalene BaP Equivalent 1 P P P P P P /17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/11 1/17/ J J J Notes: All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram. "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory detection limit ft bgs = feet below ground surface BaP Equivalent = Calculated Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent 1 Benzo(a)pyrene equivalents represent the sum of the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH multiplied by its toxicity equivalence factor (except for naphthalene). J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit. D = The sample was diluted to bring the analyte concentration within calibration range.. Page 17 of 17

37 Table 4 Summary of Arsenic, Lead and Cyanide in Soil ID Date Depth (feet bgs) Arsenic (mg/kg) Lead (mg/kg) Total Cyanide (mg/kg) P /11/ , P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ <0.50 BU P-8-2.5A 01/11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /11/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ Page 1 of 4

38 Table 4 Summary of Arsenic, Lead and Cyanide in Soil ID Date Depth (feet bgs) Arsenic (mg/kg) Lead (mg/kg) Total Cyanide (mg/kg) P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P-16A /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P-16A /12/ P /12/ P-16A /12/ P /13/ P-16A /13/ P /12/ P /12/ <0.50 P /12/ , P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /12/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ , P /13/ , P /13/ Page 2 of 4

39 Table 4 Summary of Arsenic, Lead and Cyanide in Soil ID Date Depth (feet bgs) Arsenic (mg/kg) Lead (mg/kg) Total Cyanide (mg/kg) P /13/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /19/ P /19/ P /19/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /19/ P /19/ P /19/ <0.50 P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /18/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /14/ P-32B /17/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P /13/ P-34A /13/ P-34A /14/ P-34A /14/ P-35A /18/ P /14/ <0.50 P-35A /18/ P-35A /18/ P-35A /18/ P-35A /18/ P /14/ P /14/ Page 3 of 4

40 Table 4 Summary of Arsenic, Lead and Cyanide in Soil ID Date Depth (feet bgs) Arsenic (mg/kg) Lead (mg/kg) Total Cyanide (mg/kg) Notes: P /14/ P /14/ P /14/ P /14/ P /14/ P /14/ P /14/ P /18/ P /17/ P /17/ P /17/ P /17/ P /17/ All analytical results presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory reporting limit (RL) feet bgs = feet below ground surface "---" = Not analyzed. Page 4 of 4

41 Table 5 Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil No. P P Date 01/13/11 01/12/11 Depth (feet) Units mg/kg mg/kg 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1 <2.5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1 <2.5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1 <2.5 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane <10 <25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1 <2.5 1,1-Dichloroethane <1 <2.5 1,1-Dichloroethene <1 <2.5 1,1-Dichloropropene <1 <2.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <2 <5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1 <2.5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <1 <2.5 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1 <2.5 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5 <12 1,2-Dibromoethane <1 <2.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1 <2.5 1,2-Dichloroethane <1 <2.5 1,2-Dichloropropane <1 <2.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1 <2.5 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1 <2.5 1,3-Dichloropropane <1 <2.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1 <2.5 2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <2.5 2-Butanone <10 <25 2-Chlorotoluene <1 <2.5 2-Hexanone <10 <25 4-Chlorotoluene <1 <2.5 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone <10 <25 Acetone <25 <62 Benzene Bromobenzene <1 <2.5 Bromochloromethane <1 <2.5 Bromodichloromethane <1 <2.5 Bromoform <1 <2.5 Bromomethane <5 <12 c-1,2-dichloroethene <1 <2.5 c-1,3-dichloropropene <1 <2.5 Carbon Disulfide <10 <25 Carbon Tetrachloride <1 <2.5 Chlorobenzene <1 <2.5 Chloroethane <1 <2.5 Chloroform <1 <2.5 Chloromethane <5 <12 Dibromochloromethane <1 <2.5 Dibromomethane <1 <2.5. Page 1 of 2

42 Notes: Table 5 Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil No. P P Date 01/13/11 01/12/11 Depth (feet) Units mg/kg mg/kg Dichlorodifluoromethane <1 <2.5 Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE) <2 <5 Ethanol <100 <250 Ethylbenzene Ethyl-t-Butyl Ether (ETBE) <2 <5 Isopropylbenzene <1 <2.5 Methylene Chloride <10 <25 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <1 <2.5 Naphthalene 480 J 290 n-butylbenzene <1 <2.5 n-propylbenzene <1 <2.5 o-xylene 1.5 <2.5 p/m-xylene 4.5 <2.5 p-isopropyltoluene <1 <2.5 sec-butylbenzene <1 <2.5 Styrene <1 <2.5 t-1,2-dichloroethene <1 <2.5 t-1,3-dichloropropene <1 <2.5 Tert-Amyl-Methyl Ether (TAME) <2 <5 Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA) <10 <25 tert-butylbenzene <1 <2.5 Tetrachloroethene <1 <2.5 Toluene 3.4 <2.5 Trichloroethene <1 <2.5 Trichlorofluoromethane <10 <25 Vinyl Acetate <10 <25 Vinyl Chloride <1 <2.5 "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory reporting limit (RL) J = Estimated value; analyte detected at a level less than the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limi. Page 2 of 2

43 ID Date Depth (feet) Sb Ba Be Cd Cr Co Cu Hg Mo Ni Se Ag Th V Zn (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) P /13/11 6 < <0.750 <0.250 < P /12/11 3 < < < <0.750 <0.250 < P /12/ < < <0.750 <0.250 < Notes: "<#" = not detected at or above laboratory reporting limit (RL) See Table 4 for arsenic and lead results. Sb = Antimony Co = Cobalt Se = Selenium Ba = Barium Cu = Copper Ag = Silver Be = Berylium Hg = Mercury Th = Thallium Cd = Cadmium Mo = Molybdenum V = Vanadium Cr = Chromium Ni = Nickel Zn = Zinc Table 6 Summary of Metals in Soil. Page 1 of 1

44 Boring ID Target P-41 5 P P-43 5 Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses 1 As, Pb, Sampling Rationale Assess western extent of arsenic and lead detected in shallow soil (0-6-ft interval) in boring P-1. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. 3 As, Pb, 5 Hold If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to collect most impacted soil. Drill deeper if necessary to collect a sample without visual impacts and assess analytical program. Assess eastern extent of impact detected in shallow soil (0-6-ft interval) in boring P-5. If impacted soil 1 observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range Hold Hold If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to collect most impacted soil. Drill deeper if necessary to collect a sample without visual impacts and assess analytical program. Assess eastern extent of impact detected in shallow soil (0-6-ft interval) in boring P-8. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Drill deeper if necessary to collect a sample without visual impacts and assess analytical program. Page 1 of 12

45 Boring ID Target P P P-46 5 Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, 5 Hold Sampling Rationale Assess eastern extent of impact detected in shallow soil (0-6-ft interval) in boring P-12. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Drill deeper if necessary to collect a sample without visual impacts and assess analytical program. Assess eastern extent of impact observed in boring P-22. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth to target the most impacted soil observed within the 15- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess western extent of impact observed in boring P-20. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Drill deeper if necessary to collect a sample without visual impacts and assess analytical program. Page 2 of 12

46 Boring ID Target P P Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with former gas holder and lampblack separator and evaluate extent of impact detected in 10- to 20-ft depth range in boring P-24. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth to target the most impacted soil observed within the 15- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with former lampblack tracks and evaluate the southern extent of impact detected in borings P-20 and P-21. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 15- to 35-ft depth range. Page 3 of 12

47 Boring ID Target P P P Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses 10 Hold TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with the generator and scrubbers in Building If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts in area between scrubbers and underground oil tanks. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 20-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with the former underground oil tank. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 4 of 12

48 Boring ID Target P P P Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with former MGP building If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 20-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess eastern extent of impact detected in borings P-35A and P-38. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 30-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess northern extent of impact detected in boring P-28 and evaluate potential impacts in the vicinity of former MGP building If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 5 of 12

49 Boring ID Target P-55 5 P P Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess eastern extent of impact in shallow soils (0-3 ft bgs) detected in borings P-34 and P-34A. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess southwestern extent of impact detected in boring P-27 and west of boring P-28 (underground fuel oil tank). If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess southern extent of impact detected in boring P-28 (underground fuel oil tank). If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 6 of 12

50 Boring ID Target P-58 5 P-59 5 SG-5 15 Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess eastern extent of impact detected in shallow soil (0- to 3-ft interval) in boring P-33. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess eastern extent of impact detected in shallow soil (0- to 3-ft interval) in boring P-31. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess vertical extent of TPH and PAH impact detected in boring P-15. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 7 of 12

51 Boring ID Target SG SG Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with former gas holder and lampblack separator and evaluate extent of impact detected in borings P-20 and P-24. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with former lampblack track and turntable and to evaluate extent of impact detected in boring P-21. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 8 of 12

52 Boring ID Target SG SG SG Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with former scrubbers and wash box and to evaluate extent of impact detected in boring P-23. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess eastern extent of impact detected in boring P-23. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 35-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess lateral extent of impact detected in boring P-25. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 9 of 12

53 Boring ID Target SG SG SG Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with the former underground oil tank. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with the former gas retorts. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with structures in former Building If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 15-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 10 of 12

54 Boring ID Target SG SG Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts associated with the former gas retorts and impacts detected in boring P-36. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Assess potential impacts associated with the former lampblack track and turntable inside Building 2782 and assess lateral extent of impacts detected in borings P-35A and P-38. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Page 11 of 12

55 Boring ID Target SG Target Table 7 Proposed Tier 2 Soil Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses TPPH, TEPH, BTEX, Sampling Rationale Assess potential impacts next to existing building and former Building 2781 and assess lateral extent of impacts detected in boring P-27. If impacted soil observed, adjust sampling depth to target most impacted soil in upper 1- to 2-ft depth range. The boring will be completed as a nested soil gas probe. See Table 8 for soil gas sampling program. Analyze and adjust sampling depth if impact observed and target the most impacted soil within the 10- to 25-ft depth range. Assess analytical program and drill deeper as appropriate. Notes: As = Arsenic using EPA Method 6010B Pb = Lead using EPA Method 6010B TPPH = total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons using EPA Method 8260B/5035 TEPH = total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons using EPA Method 8015 BTEX = benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes using EPA Method 8260B/5035 = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using EPA Method 8270C SIM Select soil samples will be analyzed for cyanide using EPA Method 335.2/9010, VOCs using EPA Method 8260B/5035, and metals using EPA Method 6010B/7471A. Page 12 of 12

56 Soil Gas Probe ID Target Target Soil Gas Probe SG SG SG SG SG Table 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses Sampling Rationale Assess soil gas in the vicinity of impacts detected in P-1 and P-2. Assess soil gas in the area of the former northern steel gas holder. Assess soil gas in the area of the former northern steel gas holder. Assess soil gas in the area of the former northern steel gas holder. Assess soil gas associated with impact detected in boring P-15. Soil samples will be collected and analyzed to define the vertical extent of impact in P-15. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Page 1 of 5

57 Soil Gas Probe ID Target Target Soil Gas Probe SG SG SG SG SG Table 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses Sampling Rationale Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in borings P-14 and P-17 in the area of the former gas holder. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in borings P-16 and P-17 within the area of the former gas holder. Adjust depth or eliminate 15-foot probe if concrete obstructions or liquids encountered as observed in P- 16 and P-17. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in boring P-40 and the area adjacent to the former steel purifiers. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in borings P-22 and P-23 located in the area of the former steel purifiers. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in boring P-20 and potential impacts associated with the former lampblack separator and gas holder. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Page 2 of 5

58 Soil Gas Probe ID Target Target Soil Gas Probe SG SG SG SG SG Table 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses Sampling Rationale Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in boring P-21 and potential impacts associated with the former lampblack track and turntable. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in boring P-23 and potential impacts associated with the former scrubbers. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas in Bridge Alley east of impact observed in boring P-23. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate the eastern extent of impact. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas adjacent to existing building and potential impacts associated with former gas holder and scrubbers. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas in the vicinity of the former underground oil tanks. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Page 3 of 5

59 Soil Gas Probe ID Target Target Soil Gas Probe SG SG SG SG SG Table 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses Sampling Rationale Assess soil gas in the vicinity of the former gas retorts. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas associated with impacted soil detected in boring P-26. Also to evaluate soil gas adjacent to existing building and potential impacts associated with the former washbox. If visually impacted soil is observed, collect and analyze soil samples as appropriate. Assess soil gas adjacent to existing building. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil associated with nearby former MGP structures. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas in the vicinity of the former gas retorts and to evaluate impacts detected in boring P-36. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas in the vicinity of the lampblack track and turntable inside former Building Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Page 4 of 5

60 Soil Gas Probe ID Target Target Soil Gas Probe SG SG SG SG SG Table 8 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Program and Rationale Analyses Sampling Rationale Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in borings P-35A and P-38. Assess soil gas adjacent to existing building. Soil samples will be collected from this boring to evaluate potential impacts to soil. See Table 7 for soil sampling program and rationale. Assess soil gas associated with impacts detected in boring P-28. Assess soil gas near former steel tank and impacted soil detected in borings P-32 and P-32B. Assess soil gas associated with shallow impacted soil detected in boring P-31 and potential impacts from the former generator building. Notes: VOCs = volatile organic compounds = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline Page 5 of 5

61 FIGURES

62 P:\Drafting\Projects\PGE-1059\PGE \031-PGE Site Loc Map-Fig1.dwg 3/28/ :34:56 PM PST FORMER SALINAS MGP SITE 0 2,000 4,000 FEET APPROXIMATE SCALE FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SALINAS, CALIFORNIA DATED: 1947 PHOTOREVISED: 1984 FORMER SALINAS MGP SALINAS, CALIFORNIA Terra Pacific Group Environmental Engineering, Consulting, and Construction

TETRA TECH, INC. December 8, Lynn Nakashima Berkeley Regional Office 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200C Berkeley, California 94710

TETRA TECH, INC. December 8, Lynn Nakashima Berkeley Regional Office 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200C Berkeley, California 94710 TETRA TECH, INC. December 8, 2014 Lynn Nakashima Berkeley Regional Office 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200C Berkeley, California 94710 Subject: LBNL Fiber Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensor (DAS) Survey Sampling

More information

Method 8270C PAH. FD- Field Duplicate Samples

Method 8270C PAH. FD- Field Duplicate Samples Mr. John Rendall Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road Wiscasset, Maine 04578 RE: Project No.: Maine Yankee Sediment Samples Lab Name: Katahdin Analytical Services, Westbrook, Maine Site Name: Maine Yankee Nuclear

More information

APPENDIX G. Data Management Rules. Dioxin Data Report Appendix G. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area

APPENDIX G. Data Management Rules. Dioxin Data Report Appendix G. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area APPENDIX G Data Management Rules Data Management Rules G.1 LABORATORY REPLICATE SAMPLES Chemical concentrations obtained from the analysis of laboratory duplicate or replicate samples (two or more analyses

More information

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Texas Commission on Environmental Quality INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Lorinda Gardner, Director, R15 Date: Carlos Rubinstein, Texas Border Area Director From: Valerie E. Meyers, Ph.D. Toxicology Section,

More information

APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports

APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports Allied Aviation Initial Abatement Report, Arlington, VA December 4, 2015 Amec Foster Wheeler Project 37650016 APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports #=CL# LIMS USE: FR - JOHN MITTAUER LIMS OBJECT ID:

More information

North Bay Wildfires: Response & Recovery

North Bay Wildfires: Response & Recovery North Bay Wildfires: Response & Recovery December 1, 2017 Cristina Grosso Scott Dusterhoff Meg Sedlak Presentation Overview Overview of Wildfires [Scott] Water Quality Monitoring [Meg] Response & Recovery

More information

Soil Vapor Survey: A Gasoline Plume Beneath A Residence And The Implications For Additional Corrective Action Or Case Closure

Soil Vapor Survey: A Gasoline Plume Beneath A Residence And The Implications For Additional Corrective Action Or Case Closure Soil Vapor Survey: A Gasoline Plume Beneath A Residence And The Implications For Additional Corrective Action Or Case Closure William R Chapman Senior Geologist VA DEQ NRO Remediation Program 22nd National

More information

February 9, 2018 GeoInsight Project

February 9, 2018 GeoInsight Project February 9, 2018 GeoInsight Project 7877-001 William Murphy, Director Town of Sudbury Board of Health 275 Old Lancaster Road Sudbury, MA 01776 Re: Focused Subsurface Investigation Melone Property North

More information

A CASE STUDY OF THREE PETROLEUM REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES PREPARED BY: Paul Kirk OCTOBER 2017

A CASE STUDY OF THREE PETROLEUM REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES PREPARED BY: Paul Kirk OCTOBER 2017 A CASE STUDY OF THREE PETROLEUM REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES PREPARED BY: Paul Kirk OCTOBER 2017 I. Introduction There are over one million underground storage tanks (USTs) in the United States that contain

More information

Environmental Forensic Principals for Sources Allocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Environmental Forensic Principals for Sources Allocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Investigate Integrate Innovate Environmental Forensic Principals for Sources Allocation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons October 2008 Presented by: Gwen O Sullivan, Erik Martin and Court D. Sandau Presentation

More information

Soil Sampling Results Former Truck Maintenance Garage

Soil Sampling Results Former Truck Maintenance Garage Soil Sampling Results Former Truck Maintenance Garage Maine Yankee Decommissioning Project Corrective Measures Study May 2004 Prepared for: Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road, Bailey Point Wiscasset, ME 04578

More information

Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. Post Office Box River Road Washington NC Web: iimr.home.coastalnet.com 1

Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. Post Office Box River Road   Washington NC Web: iimr.home.coastalnet.com 1 Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. Post Office Box 2494 5290 River Road Email: iimr@coastalnet.com Washington NC 27889 Web: iimr.home.coastalnet.com 1 August 2010 Jeffrey L. Andrews, PSM, CH Vice President

More information

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table Table Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table Phase II Investigation Consolidated Edison - Former kent Avenue Generating Station 0 Kent Avenue Brooklyn, NY Sample ID Date Installed Date Sample Collected

More information

APPENDIX K. Fingerprinting Justification Memo

APPENDIX K. Fingerprinting Justification Memo APPENDIX K Fingerprinting Justification Memo TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Oakland Bay Sediment Investigation Potential for Fingerprinting Analysis using Sediment Data April 2009 Prepared for Washington Department

More information

Tar measurement by the Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) method

Tar measurement by the Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) method Tar measurement by the Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) method A.J. Grootjes Presented at the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition (EU BC&E), ICC Berlin, Germany (Conference 6-10 June 2011 - Exhibition

More information

Reviewing Material Safety Data Sheets to Verify Significant Drinking Water Threats

Reviewing Material Safety Data Sheets to Verify Significant Drinking Water Threats Reviewing Material Safety Data Sheets to Verify Significant Drinking Water Threats 1 INTRODUCTION When attempting to verify the existence of a Significant Drinking Water Threat (SDWT) related to the handling

More information

Results of a Sediment Survey in the Near Offshore Waters of the Proposed Quarry Site in the Vicinity of Whites Cove, Digby Neck, Nova Scotia

Results of a Sediment Survey in the Near Offshore Waters of the Proposed Quarry Site in the Vicinity of Whites Cove, Digby Neck, Nova Scotia Results of a Sediment Survey in the Near Offshore Waters of the Proposed Quarry Site in the Vicinity of Whites Cove, Digby Neck, Nova Scotia Prepared for Paul G. Buxton P.O. Box 98 Annapolis Royal, Nova

More information

August 24, Ref: Bryant M. Watson Executive Director Vermont Association of Snow Travelers, Inc. 26 VAST Lane Barre, Vermont 05641

August 24, Ref: Bryant M. Watson Executive Director Vermont Association of Snow Travelers, Inc. 26 VAST Lane Barre, Vermont 05641 Environmental Transportation Land Development Services August 24, 2010 Ref: 57369 Bryant M. Watson Executive Director Vermont Association of Snow Travelers, Inc. 26 VAST Lane Barre, Vermont 05641 Re: Snowmobile

More information

Appendix 1: Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds: Nomenclature and Analysis

Appendix 1: Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds: Nomenclature and Analysis Appendix 1: Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds: Nomenclature and Analysis This appendix provides an explanation for and definition of the terms that have been used to describe polycyclic aromatic compounds.

More information

Forebay Confirmatory Sediment Sampling Results

Forebay Confirmatory Sediment Sampling Results Forebay Confirmatory Sediment Sampling Results Maine Yankee Decommissioning Project Corrective Measures Study May 2004 Prepared for: Maine Yankee 321 Old Ferry Road, Bailey Point Wiscasset, ME 04578 Prepared

More information

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY 5 Lan Drive, Suite 200 Westford, Massachusetts 01886 Tel. (978) 692-1114 Fax (978) 692-1115 GeoInsight Project Number 3871-002 SEGMENT IDENTIFICATION: SEGMENT

More information

TPH Methods and Measurements and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion (PVI) Risks

TPH Methods and Measurements and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion (PVI) Risks TPH Methods and Measurements and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion (PVI) Risks Robert Truesdale, RTI International Heidi Hayes, Eurofins Air Toxics Ian Hers, Golder Associates 1 RTI International is a trade name

More information

EL608. Deodorants [EL /1/ ]

EL608. Deodorants [EL /1/ ] EL608. Deodorants [EL608-2004/1/2004-125] 1. Scope The criteria shall apply to the chemical deodorant which is used in closed or stuffy space (hereinafter referred to as close space ), or in opened space

More information

AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road Suite fax Beltsville, Maryland 20705

AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road Suite fax Beltsville, Maryland 20705 AECOM 0..00 tel 000 Virginia Manor Road Suite 0..0 fax Beltsville, Maryland 00 October, 0 Mr. Matt Mueller AECOM Project #: 0 Maryland Department of Environment Oil Control Program 00 Washington Blvd.

More information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information 1 Supporting Information 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 MANUSCRIPT TITLE: AUTHORS: ADDRESS: Sediment Records of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Continental Shelf of China: Implications for

More information

Test Report. Report No. ECL01H Page 1 of 5

Test Report. Report No. ECL01H Page 1 of 5 Report No. ECL01H067809002 Page 1 of 5 Applicant Address LITE-ON MICROELECTRONICS (WUXI) CO., LTD. LITE-ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. LAND LOT J7 J8WEPZ, NEW DISTRICT, WUXI CITY, JIANGSU, CHINA 9F,NO.233-2 PAO-CHIAO

More information

Selection of a Capillary GC Column

Selection of a Capillary GC Column Selection of a Capillary GC Column Mark Sinnott Application Engineer March 13, 2008 Page 1 Typical Gas Chromatographic System Mol-Sieve Traps Fixed Restrictors Regulators Injection Port Detector Electrometer

More information

Ultrasonic wave extraction and simultaneous analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phthalic esters in soil

Ultrasonic wave extraction and simultaneous analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phthalic esters in soil Journal of Groundwater Journal of Science Groundwater and Engineering Science and Vol.5 Engineering No.3 Jul. Vol.5 2017 No.3 Sept. 2017 Ultrasonic wave extraction and simultaneous analysis of polycyclic

More information

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc BIG SHANTY ROAD, NW, SUITE 100 KENNESAW, GEORGIA (770)

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc BIG SHANTY ROAD, NW, SUITE 100 KENNESAW, GEORGIA (770) Dutch Valley Rd NE Worchester Dr NE Hillpine Dr NE Maddox Dr NE Lee St SW Maddox Dr NE Avery Dr NE E Park Ln NE Piedmont Ave NE Yorkshire Rd NE ³ Park Ln NE Westminster Dr NE Piedmont Way NE Westminster

More information

18/05/2010 Soil. 18/05/2010 Soil

18/05/2010 Soil. 18/05/2010 Soil CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Client: MPL Laboratories 1618 Hayden Court Myaree WA 6153 Attention: Tania Notaras Sample log in details: : No. of samples: Date samples received: Date completed instructions received:

More information

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Your Project #: VILLAGE OF TAHSIS Your C.O.C. #: 084437 Attention:Mark DeGagne -35 Estevan Rd Nanaimo, BC CANADA V9S 3Y3 Report #: R24287 Version: - Final MAXXAM JOB #: B5B343 Received: 205/2/22, 5:45

More information

V#2162/ FORMER CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. STATION #70041 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK RTN LYNN FELLS PARKWAY SAUGUS, MASSACHUSETTS 01906

V#2162/ FORMER CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. STATION #70041 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK RTN LYNN FELLS PARKWAY SAUGUS, MASSACHUSETTS 01906 V#2162/ FORMER CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. STATION #70041 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK RTN 3-28775 172 LYNN FELLS PARKWAY SAUGUS, MASSACHUSETTS 01906 Prepared for: Cumberland Farms, Inc. 100 Crossing Boulevard Framingham,

More information

PAHs in Parking Lot Sealcoats. Performance Study. Asphalt Based. Coal Tar Sealcoat Sealcoat. Sealcoat. Scrapings. Asphalt Based.

PAHs in Parking Lot Sealcoats. Performance Study. Asphalt Based. Coal Tar Sealcoat Sealcoat. Sealcoat. Scrapings. Asphalt Based. PAHs in Parking Lot s Sitelab Corporation Visit: site-lab.com USA: 978-363-99 Performance Study PAHs in Parking Lot s Page 1 of 5 There is growing concern over the use of sealcoating products used on driveways,

More information

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY 5 Lan Drive, Suite 200 Westford, Massachusetts 01886 Tel. (978) 692-1114 Fax (978) 692-1115 GeoInsight Project Number 3871-002 SEGMENT IDENTIFICATION: SEGMENT

More information

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Seafood by an Automated QuEChERS Solution

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Seafood by an Automated QuEChERS Solution Application Note Abstract Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Seafood by an Automated QuEChERS Solution Page 1 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a large group of organic compounds

More information

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made

More information

Dissemination patterns and risks impersonated of PAHs contaminated in the surface and subsurface soil

Dissemination patterns and risks impersonated of PAHs contaminated in the surface and subsurface soil Dissemination patterns and risks impersonated of PAHs contaminated in the surface and subsurface soil Mohamed H. EL-Saeid Professor King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 4/29/2015 Pollution

More information

Brant A. Smith P.E., Ph.D. Remediation Technologies (RemTech) Symposium Banff, Alberta October 14, 2015

Brant A. Smith P.E., Ph.D. Remediation Technologies (RemTech) Symposium Banff, Alberta October 14, 2015 Application of Alkaline Activated Persulfate to Treat Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination Beneath the Active Construciton of a 32-Story High-Rise Residential Tower Brant A. Smith P.E., Ph.D. Remediation

More information

Selection of a Capillary

Selection of a Capillary Selection of a Capillary GC Column - Series 3 Mark Sinnott Application Engineer March 19, 2009 Page 1 Typical Gas Chromatographic System Mol-Sieve Traps Fixed Restrictors Regulators Injection Port Detector

More information

Authorized By: For Intertek Testing Services Ltd., Shanghai. Joanne Li Deputy General Manager

Authorized By: For Intertek Testing Services Ltd., Shanghai. Joanne Li Deputy General Manager Applicant: BEIJING FNFOG SECURITY TECHNOLOGY Date: Aug 20, 2018 ROOM 317, BUILD A, NO. 25, YONGTAI ROAD, HAIDIAN DISTRICT, BEIJING Attn: DONG JIANG Sample Description: One (1 ) groups/pieces of submitted

More information

Prepared by: ASL Analytical Service Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia. Prepared for:

Prepared by: ASL Analytical Service Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia. Prepared for: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, LANDS, AND PARKS PETROLEUM HYDRDROCARBON METHODS STUDY (1998) ROUND ROBIN AND SINGLE LABORATORY RESULTS FINAL REPORT

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.3 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) IN YALE RESERVOIR (WAQ 3)...WAQ 3-1 3.3.1 Study Objectives...WAQ 3-1 3.3.2 Study Area...WAQ 3-1 3.3.3 Methods...WAQ 3-1 3.3.4 Key Questions...WAQ

More information

Potassium permanganate as an oxidant in the remediation of soils polluted by Bonny light crude oil

Potassium permanganate as an oxidant in the remediation of soils polluted by Bonny light crude oil Sky Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management Vol. 3(2), pp. 4-19, February, 2014 Available online http://www.skyjournals.org/sjssem ISSN 2315-8794 2014 Sky Journals Full Length Research Paper

More information

MEASUREMENT OF DRY DEPOSITION AMOUNT OF PAHS IN ZONGULDAK REGION

MEASUREMENT OF DRY DEPOSITION AMOUNT OF PAHS IN ZONGULDAK REGION Journal of Young Scientist, Volume II, 2014 ISSN 2344-1283; ISSN CD-ROM 2344-1291; ISSN Online 2344-1305; ISSN-L 2344 1283 MEASUREMENT OF DRY DEPOSITION AMOUNT OF PAHS IN ZONGULDAK REGION Eren KARAKAVUZ

More information

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018 Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Facility I.D. No. 17166 AEC Project No. 14-059

More information

Applied Geophysics for Environmental Site Characterization and Remediation

Applied Geophysics for Environmental Site Characterization and Remediation Applied Geophysics for Environmental Site Characterization and Remediation MSECA Webinar September 24, 2015 John Mundell, P.E., L.P.G. Ryan Brumbaugh, L.P.G. MUNDELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Webinar Objective

More information

Detection of Environmental Contaminants Caused by the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico by GC and Hplc

Detection of Environmental Contaminants Caused by the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico by GC and Hplc Detection of Environmental Contaminants Caused by the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico by GC and Hplc Sky Countryman, Ngoc Nguyen, Jeff Layne, Kory Kelly, and Zeshan Aqeel Phenomenex, Inc., 411 Madrid Ave.,

More information

DETERMINATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL AT AL-NAHRAWAN BRICKS FACTORY Thamera K. M. Al-Rudaini 1 and Israa M.H.

DETERMINATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL AT AL-NAHRAWAN BRICKS FACTORY Thamera K. M. Al-Rudaini 1 and Israa M.H. Pak. J. Biotechnol. VOL. 15 (2) 445-450 (2018) ISSN Print: 1812-1837 ww.pjbt.org ISSN online: 2312-7791 DETERMINATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL AT AL-NAHRAWAN BRICKS FACTORY Thamera K.

More information

Determination of 24 PAHs in Drinking Water

Determination of 24 PAHs in Drinking Water Determination of 24 PAHs in Drinking Water Application Note Food Testing and Agriculture Authors M.C. Díaz Ramos, A. Suárez, A. Rúbies, and R. Companyó Laboratori de l Agencia de Salut Publica de Barcelona

More information

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California TETRA TECH, INC. February 5, 2016 Lynn Nakashima Berkeley Regional Office 700 Heinz Avenue, Suite 200C Berkeley, California 94710 Subject: Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond

More information

INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL AIR MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS

INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL AIR MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL AIR MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS Prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District July 25, 2014 1 This Page Left Intentionally Blank 2 INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL AIR MONITORING

More information

Test Report. No. SHAHG Date: 07 Jun Page 1 of 7.

Test Report. No. SHAHG Date: 07 Jun Page 1 of 7. Test Report No Date: 07 Jun 2016 Page 1 of 7 WUHAN XINYONGAN PAPER PLASTIC CO,LTD NO16,FENGHUANG ROAD,FENGHUANGSHAN IZONE,CAIDIAN DISTWUHAN CITY,HUBEI,CHINA The following sample(s) was/were submitted and

More information

Guidance on the Major Source Determination for Certain Hazardous Air Pollutants

Guidance on the Major Source Determination for Certain Hazardous Air Pollutants MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM: TO: Guidance on the Major Source Determination for Certain Hazardous Air Pollutants John S. Seitz, Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (MD-10) Director, Office

More information

Sensitive and rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tap water

Sensitive and rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tap water APPLICATION NOTE 70923 Sensitive and rapid determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tap water Authors Chen Jing, Dai Zhenyu, Xu Qun, and Liang Lina, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, People

More information

Test Report No. : CE/2008/38467 Date : 2008/04/07 Page : 2 of 11 Test Result(s) PART NAME NO.1 : BLACK PLASTIC TUBE Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Mercury (Hg

Test Report No. : CE/2008/38467 Date : 2008/04/07 Page : 2 of 11 Test Result(s) PART NAME NO.1 : BLACK PLASTIC TUBE Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Mercury (Hg Test Report No. : CE/2008/38467 Date : 2008/04/07 Page : 1 of 11 The following sample(s) was/were submitted and identified by/on behalf of the client as : Sample Description : Style/Item No. : Lot No.

More information

USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY. Abstract

USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY. Abstract USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY John A. Mundell, Mundell & Associates, Inc., Indianapolis, IN Gregory B. Byer, Mundell &

More information

Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in various technological processes i INTRODUCTION

Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in various technological processes i INTRODUCTION Occupational to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in various technological processes i I. Makhniashvili, M. Pośniak Central Institute for Labour Protection National Research Institute ul. Czerniakowska

More information

ILLA SpA VIA GHISOLFI GUARESCHI, NOCETO (PR)

ILLA SpA VIA GHISOLFI GUARESCHI, NOCETO (PR) FOOD PACKAGING MATERIALS FOOD CONTACTS 1265\FPM\FDC\15 12/11/2015 1 ILLA SpA VIA GHISOLFI GUARESCHI, 1 43015 NOCETO (PR) D.P.R. dated 23/08/1982, D.L. 108 dated 25/01/1992, D.M.34 dated 21/3/3 European

More information

Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose

Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose Edward J. Staples, Electronic Sensor Technology, EST@ESTCAL.COM Remediation Site Description Remediation of contaminated soil from where

More information

Int. J. Renew. Energ & Environ Vol.2, pp 56-64(2016)

Int. J. Renew. Energ & Environ Vol.2, pp 56-64(2016) Copyright 2016 National Centre for Energy and Environment, Energy Commission of Nigeria, University of Benin: ISSN 2504-9593 Int. J. Renew. Energ & Environ Vol.2, pp 56-64(2016) CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYCYCLIC

More information

Test Report No. SH / CHEM Date: Apr. 28, 2008 Page 1 of 6

Test Report No. SH / CHEM Date: Apr. 28, 2008 Page 1 of 6 Test Report No. SH8055319/ CHEM Date: Apr. 28, 2008 Page 1 of 6 ASAHI-DUPONT POM (ZHANGJIAGANG) COMPANY LIMITED NO.37 DONGHAI RD. YANGTZE RIVER INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL PARK, ZHANGJIAGANG JIANGSU. The following

More information

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY 5 Lan Drive, Suite 200 Westford, Massachusetts 01886 Tel. (978) 692-1114 Fax (978) 692-1115 GeoInsight Project Number 3871-002 SEGMENT IDENTIFICATION: SEGMENT

More information

Table 5-1 Sampling Program Summary for Milltown Ford Avenue Redevelopment Area, NJ.

Table 5-1 Sampling Program Summary for Milltown Ford Avenue Redevelopment Area, NJ. Table 5- Sampling Program Summary for Milltown Ford Avenue Redevelopment Area, NJ. Transformer Pads (9 pads: PAD 9) Evaluate if PCBs presently exist in soils adjacent to, and/or beneath the transformer

More information

Multi-residue Analysis for PAHs, PCBs and OCPs on Agilent J&W FactorFour VF-Xms

Multi-residue Analysis for PAHs, PCBs and OCPs on Agilent J&W FactorFour VF-Xms Multi-residue Analysis for PAHs, PCBs and OCPs on Agilent J&W FactorFour VF-Xms Application Note Author Laura Provoost Agilent Technologies, Inc. Introduction In multi-residue analysis different groups

More information

Imagine the result. Sediment Investigation Work Plan. Former Tidewater Facility

Imagine the result. Sediment Investigation Work Plan. Former Tidewater Facility Imagine the result Sediment Investigation Work Plan Former Tidewater Facility July 2008 Sediment Investigation Work Plan Former Tidewater Facility Prepared for: National Grid Prepared by: ARCADIS 100 Cummings

More information

The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis

The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis SGE Environmental GC Columns Performance Selectivity Delivery Promise www.sge.com SGE Environmental GC Columns The Suite for Environmental GC Analysis SGE GC Columns

More information

Analysis of Alkyl PAHs And Geochemical Biomarkers

Analysis of Alkyl PAHs And Geochemical Biomarkers Analysis of Alkyl PAHs And Geochemical Biomarkers Chuck Neslund, Manager Specialty Services NEMC Environmental Measurement Symposium, August 5-9, 2013, San Antonio, TX Providing comprehensive scientific

More information

METHOD 8100 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS

METHOD 8100 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS METHOD 8100 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 Method 8100 is used to determine the concentration of certain polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Table 1 indicates compounds

More information

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water by GC/MS PBM

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water by GC/MS PBM Organics Revision Date: July 10, 2017 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water by GC/MS PBM Parameter Analytical Method Introduction Method Summary MDL(s) and EMS Analyte Codes Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

More information

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident ANALYTICAL RESULTS Prepared by: Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental 2425 New Holland Pike Lancaster, PA 760 Prepared for: PO Box 4592 Houston TX 7720-4592 June 8, 204 Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline

More information

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident ANALYTICAL RESULTS Prepared by: Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental 2425 New Holland Pike Lancaster, PA 760 Prepared for: PO Box 4592 Houston TX 7720-4592 April 3, 205 Project: Mayflower, AR

More information

May 4, Mr. Bruce Hampson Town of Wilton Miller-Driscoll School Building Committee 238 Danbury Road Wilton, Connecticut 06897

May 4, Mr. Bruce Hampson Town of Wilton Miller-Driscoll School Building Committee 238 Danbury Road Wilton, Connecticut 06897 May 4, 2015 Mr. Bruce Hampson Town of Wilton Miller-Driscoll School Building Committee 238 Danbury Road Wilton, Connecticut 06897 RE: Focused Soil Investigation Miller-Driscoll School Wilton, CT TRC Project

More information

The direct effect of the harbour. micropollutant concentration. Workshop Characterization of atmospheric pollution in harbour areas 26 June 2013

The direct effect of the harbour. micropollutant concentration. Workshop Characterization of atmospheric pollution in harbour areas 26 June 2013 pollution in harbour areas 26 June 2013 The direct effect of the harbour of Brindisi on organic micropollutant concentration Elena Gregoris, Andrea Gambaro Institute for the dynamics of the environmental

More information

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

ANALYTICAL RESULTS. Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident ANALYTICAL RESULTS Prepared by: Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental 2425 New Holland Pike Lancaster, PA 760 Prepared for: Houston TX 7720-4592 August 9, 204 Project: Mayflower, AR Pipeline Incident

More information

Application Note. Agilent Application Solution Analysis of PAHs in soil according to EPA 8310 method with UV and fluorescence detection.

Application Note. Agilent Application Solution Analysis of PAHs in soil according to EPA 8310 method with UV and fluorescence detection. Agilent Application Solution Analysis of PAHs in soil according to EPA 3 method with UV and fluorescence detection Application Note Environmental Authors Sonja Volk, Angelika Gratzfeld-Huesgen Agilent

More information

Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017

Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017 Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017 Prepared by: Anchor QEA 90 Elwood Davis Rd, Suite 340 Liverpool, NY 13088 Prepared for: Consolidated

More information

Environmental Forensics

Environmental Forensics Environmental Forensics N O T E S Volume 4 28 Attention: Webinar Announcement Technical Approaches for Apportioning Liability and Allocating Environmental Costs December 1, 28 click here for more information

More information

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT

More information

Application of an Analytical Technique for Determining Alkyl PAHs, Saturated Hydrocarbons and Geochemical Biomarkers

Application of an Analytical Technique for Determining Alkyl PAHs, Saturated Hydrocarbons and Geochemical Biomarkers Application of an Analytical Technique for Determining Alkyl PAHs, Saturated Hydrocarbons and Geochemical Biomarkers Chuck Neslund, Manager Specialty Services National Environmental Monitoring Conference

More information

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY

BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY BOUCHARD B120 RELEASE SHORELINE SEGMENT SUMMARY 5 Lan Drive, Suite 200 Westford, Massachusetts 01886 Tel. (978) 692-1114 Fax (978) 692-1115 GeoInsight Project Number 3871-002 SEGMENT IDENTIFICATION: SEGMENT

More information

CCME Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Tier 1 Method

CCME Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Tier 1 Method Rating Guide Appendix for the CCME Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum (PHC) in Soil - Tier 1 Method (Note: Checklist incorporates requirements from Dec 2000 version + Addendum

More information

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 2100 Main Street, Suite 150 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 USA Tel (714) 969-0800 Fax (714) 969-0820 15 February 2006 Ms. Tamara Zeier, P.E. Project Manager Project Navigator, Ltd. One

More information

Rely on Rxi -PAH Columns

Rely on Rxi -PAH Columns Rely on Rxi -PAH Columns to Ensure Successful Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Analysis Optimized Efficiency, Selectivity, and Robustness Let You: Report accurate results with speed and confidence.

More information

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

More information

Helcom Submerged Bonn

Helcom Submerged Bonn HAZARD OF SEABED CONTAMINATION BY OIL PRODUCTS FROM MOTOR SHIP WRECKS BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE STUTTGART SHIP WRECK Hac B., Helcom Submerged Bonn 22-23.04.2015 s/s Stuttgart Stuttgart ship wreck Main

More information

MINUTES NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (NAVWPNSTA) SEAL BEACH RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD (RAB) AND COMMUNITY MEETING SITE TOUR July 12, 2010

MINUTES NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (NAVWPNSTA) SEAL BEACH RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD (RAB) AND COMMUNITY MEETING SITE TOUR July 12, 2010 MINUTES NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (NAVWPNSTA) SEAL BEACH RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD (RAB) AND COMMUNITY MEETING SITE TOUR July 12, 2010 Participants: Blake, Geoffrey / RAB Community Member Broderick, John

More information

Test Report No. : CE/2009/34977 Date : 2009/03/25 Page : 1 of 10

Test Report No. : CE/2009/34977 Date : 2009/03/25 Page : 1 of 10 Test Report No. : CE/2009/34977 Date : 2009/03/25 Page : 1 of 10 The following sample(s) was/were submitted and identified by/on behalf of the client as : Sample Description : FPC HOUSING Style/Item No.

More information

ATTACHMENT A WEAVER BOTTOMS SEDIMENT BASIN MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUMMARY (APRIL 7, 2014)

ATTACHMENT A WEAVER BOTTOMS SEDIMENT BASIN MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUMMARY (APRIL 7, 2014) ATTACHMENT A WEAVER BOTTOMS SEDIMENT BASIN MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUMMARY (APRIL 7, 2014) PRE-PROJECT DREDGE MATERIAL SEDIMENT CORE AND BASELINE CONTAMINANT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Round 1 Sediment Investigation and Plan for Round 2 Investigation Sparrows Point Phase I Area

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Round 1 Sediment Investigation and Plan for Round 2 Investigation Sparrows Point Phase I Area EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC 225 Schilling Circle Hunt Valley, MD 21031 Telephone: 410-584-7000 FAX: 410-771-1625 www.eaest.com 14 January 2015 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Andrew

More information

Drillox Technology. Technology Covered by Patent Application

Drillox Technology. Technology Covered by Patent Application Drillox Technology Technology Covered by Patent Application Presentation Outline Calcium Peroxide Properties The Drillox Technology Principle Comparison with other oxidants Testing protocol Lab studies

More information

Appendix B. Sediment Sampling Memo Winnetka Pond East

Appendix B. Sediment Sampling Memo Winnetka Pond East Appendix B Sediment Sampling Memo Winnetka Pond East Technical Memorandum To: Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission From: Kevin Menken and Candice Kantor Subject: Winnetka Pond East Sediment Characterization

More information

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice UNCLASSIFIED Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice ADP012132 TITLE: Fuels Combustion Research: Supercritical Fuel Pyrolysis DISTRIBUTION: Approved for public release, distribution

More information

Accelerated Solvent Extraction GC-MS Analysis and Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil

Accelerated Solvent Extraction GC-MS Analysis and Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Accelerated Solvent Extraction GC-MS Analysis and Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil Che Jinshui, 1 Deng Guifeng, 1 Liang Lina, 1 and Aaron Kettle, 2 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific (China)

More information

Consideration of Non-radioactive Harmful Substances

Consideration of Non-radioactive Harmful Substances Consideration of Non-radioactive Harmful Substances Dr. Petra Steinbach, Matthias Bothe Verein für Kernverfahrenstechnik und Analytik Rossendorf e.v. PF 510119, 01314 Dresden, Germany matthias.bothe@vkta.de

More information

PAH Analyses with High Efficiency GC Columns: Column Selection and Best Practices

PAH Analyses with High Efficiency GC Columns: Column Selection and Best Practices PAH Analyses with High Efficiency GC Columns: Column Selection and Best Practices Food Quality and Environmental Author Ken Lynam Agilent Technologies, Inc. 280 Centerville Road Wilmington, DE 19808 Abstract

More information

SYNOPSIS OF CHANGES TO BC LABORATORY MANUAL, MARCH 2017

SYNOPSIS OF CHANGES TO BC LABORATORY MANUAL, MARCH 2017 SYNOPSIS OF CHANGES TO BC LABORATORY MANUAL, MARCH 2017 A. INTRODUCTION The British Columbia Ministry of Environment (MOE) has updated the Laboratory Manual with new analytical methods for use under the

More information

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT U.S. EPA BROWNFIELDS PETROLEUM SUBSTANCES ASSESSMENT GRANT 411 EAST 15 TH STREET DUBUQUE COUNTY DUBUQUE, IOWA

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT U.S. EPA BROWNFIELDS PETROLEUM SUBSTANCES ASSESSMENT GRANT 411 EAST 15 TH STREET DUBUQUE COUNTY DUBUQUE, IOWA PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT U.S. EPA BROWNFIELS PETROLEUM SUBSTANCES ASSESSMENT GRANT EAST TH STREET UBUQUE COUNTY UBUQUE, IOWA HR GREEN, INC. PROJECT NO. 00 OCTOBER, 0 PREPARE FOR: CITY OF

More information

A Single-Method Approach for the Analysis of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Air Using Thermal Desorption Coupled with GC MS

A Single-Method Approach for the Analysis of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Air Using Thermal Desorption Coupled with GC MS Electronically reprinted from Volume 32 Number 10 OCTOBER 2014 www.chromatographyonline.com A Single-Method Approach for the Analysis of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Air Using Thermal

More information

2. September 2015 Sub-Concrete Slab Soil Investigation

2. September 2015 Sub-Concrete Slab Soil Investigation To: Pam Barnett, RACER Ref. No.: 11109615 From: John-eric Pardys/kf/1 Date: October 30, 2015 Re: Summary of Sub-Concrete Slab Soil Investigation RACER Fredericksburg Facility Spotsylvania County, Virginia

More information

TABLE 1 SSFL CHEMICAL SOIL BACKGROUND STUDY DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

TABLE 1 SSFL CHEMICAL SOIL BACKGROUND STUDY DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES Problem Statement: Soil chemical concentration data for selected constituents are needed from off-site chemical background reference areas (CBRAs) to establish a regulatory-compliant, publicly-reviewed,

More information