Intersection Synchronous Logic

Transcription

1 UnB 2007 p. 1/2 Intersection Synchronous Logic Elaine Gouvêa Pimentel Simona Ronchi della Rocca Luca Roversi UFMG/UNITO, 2007

2 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation

3 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic

4 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic Intersection Types

5 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic Intersection Types The logical system ISL

6 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic Intersection Types The logical system ISL Curry-Howard isomorphism

7 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic Intersection Types The logical system ISL Curry-Howard isomorphism Strong normalization

8 UnB 2007 p. 2/2 Outline Motivation Intuitionistic Logic Intersection Types The logical system ISL Curry-Howard isomorphism Strong normalization The intersection

9 UnB 2007 p. 3/2 Motivation IT: type system.

10 UnB 2007 p. 3/2 Motivation IT: type system. That is, it concerns terms and types.

11 UnB 2007 p. 3/2 Motivation IT: type system. That is, it concerns terms and types. Goal: to give a proof-theoretical justification for IT.

12 UnB 2007 p. 3/2 Motivation IT: type system. That is, it concerns terms and types. Goal: to give a proof-theoretical justification for IT. That is, reformulate Intersection Types IT by means of a pure logical system.

13 UnB 2007 p. 3/2 Motivation IT: type system. That is, it concerns terms and types. Goal: to give a proof-theoretical justification for IT. That is, reformulate Intersection Types IT by means of a pure logical system. Basis step: to clarify the difference between intersection and intuitionistic conjunction by imposing constraints on the use of logical and structural rules of intuitionistic logic.

14 UnB 2007 p. 4/2 Motivation Given a deduction Π : Γ IT M : σ, the term M records where -introductions and eliminations are used.

15 UnB 2007 p. 4/2 Motivation Given a deduction Π : Γ IT M : σ, the term M records where -introductions and eliminations are used. Intersection can be introduced only between formulas typing the same term.

16 UnB 2007 p. 4/2 Motivation Given a deduction Π : Γ IT M : σ, the term M records where -introductions and eliminations are used. Intersection can be introduced only between formulas typing the same term. ISL: never relies on λ-terms to mark the points where intersection operators of IT can be introduced.

17 UnB 2007 p. 5/2 Motivation Proves properties of sets of deductions of NJ.

18 UnB 2007 p. 5/2 Motivation Proves properties of sets of deductions of NJ. The deductions of the same set must be synchronous with respect to the use of -introduction and elimination.

19 UnB 2007 p. 5/2 Motivation Proves properties of sets of deductions of NJ. The deductions of the same set must be synchronous with respect to the use of -introduction and elimination. Deductions Π 1,..., Π n of NJ in the same set all have the same structure.

20 UnB 2007 p. 5/2 Motivation Proves properties of sets of deductions of NJ. The deductions of the same set must be synchronous with respect to the use of -introduction and elimination. Deductions Π 1,..., Π n of NJ in the same set all have the same structure. Rules of ISL must inductively build the sets of synchronous derivations of NJ as they were equivalence classes.

21 UnB 2007 p. 6/2 Logic and Programming The Curry-Howard isomorphism Logical formulas Types Proofs Programs Cut elimination Evaluation

22 UnB 2007 p. 7/2 Logic and Programming From Logic to Programming rigorous foundation for the design of Programming Languages

23 UnB 2007 p. 7/2 Logic and Programming From Logic to Programming rigorous foundation for the design of Programming Languages tools for automatic synthesis, verification, transformation of programs

24 UnB 2007 p. 8/2 Logic and Programming From Programming to Logic new problems and results in proof theory (e.g., typability problem)

25 UnB 2007 p. 8/2 Logic and Programming From Programming to Logic new problems and results in proof theory (e.g., typability problem) design of new logical systems inspired from programming (e.g., light logics)

26 UnB 2007 p. 9/2 Proofs decoration (R) φ 1,..., φ n ψ i (1 i n) φ 1,..., φ n R(ψ 1,..., ψ n )

27 UnB 2007 p. 9/2 Proofs decoration (R) φ 1,..., φ n ψ i (1 i n) φ 1,..., φ n R(ψ 1,..., ψ n ) x 1 : φ 1,..., x n : φ n M i : ψ i (1 i n) x 1 : φ 1,..., x n : φ n R(M 1,..., M n ) : R(ψ 1,..., ψ n )

28 UnB 2007 p. 10/2 An unusual case study From Computations to proofs Given a type assignment, assigning types to terms, we asked for a logical foundation of it, i.e., for a logic such that the type assignment can be seen as a decoration of it.

29 UnB 2007 p. 10/2 An unusual case study From Computations to proofs Given a type assignment, assigning types to terms, we asked for a logical foundation of it, i.e., for a logic such that the type assignment can be seen as a decoration of it. and back By decorating such a logic with a different technique, we built a new typed language, for expressing the discrete polymorphism, which was a longstanding open problem.

30 UnB 2007 p. 11/2 { }-fragment of NJ Formulae: σ, ρ, τ ::= a (σ σ) (σ σ) where a belongs to a denumerable set of constants.

31 UnB 2007 p. 11/2 { }-fragment of NJ Formulae: σ, ρ, τ ::= a (σ σ) (σ σ) where a belongs to a denumerable set of constants. A context is a finite sequence σ 1,..., σ m of formulae. Contexts are denoted by Γ and.

32 UnB 2007 p. 11/2 { }-fragment of NJ Formulae: σ, ρ, τ ::= a (σ σ) (σ σ) where a belongs to a denumerable set of constants. A context is a finite sequence σ 1,..., σ m of formulae. Contexts are denoted by Γ and. The implicative and conjunctive fragment of NJ proves statements Γ NJ σ, where Γ is a context and σ a formula.

33 UnB 2007 p. 12/2 { }-fragment of NJ (A) σ NJ σ (X) Γ 1, σ 1, σ 2, Γ 2 NJ σ Γ 1, σ 2, σ 1, Γ 2 NJ σ ( E l ) Γ NJ σ τ Γ NJ σ ( I) Γ, σ NJ τ Γ NJ σ τ (W) ( I) Γ NJ σ Γ NJ σ Γ, τ NJ σ Γ NJ τ Γ NJ σ τ ( E r ) Γ NJ σ τ Γ NJ τ ( E) Γ NJ σ τ Γ NJ σ Γ NJ τ

34 UnB 2007 p. 13/2 Decorating NJ (A) x :σ NJ x :σ (X) Γ 1, x :σ 1, y :σ 2, Γ 2 NJ M :σ Γ 1, y :σ 2, x :σ 1, Γ 2 NJ M :σ ( E l ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π l(m) :σ ( I) Γ, x :σ NJ M :τ Γ NJ λx.m :σ τ ( (W) Γ NJ M :σ x dom(γ) Γ, x :τ NJ M :σ ( I) Γ NJ M :σ Γ NJ N :τ Γ NJ (M, N) :σ τ ( E r ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π r(m) :τ E) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ N : Γ NJ MN :τ

35 UnB 2007 p. 13/2 Decorating NJ (A) x :σ NJ x :σ (X) Γ 1, x :σ 1, y :σ 2, Γ 2 NJ M :σ Γ 1, y :σ 2, x :σ 1, Γ 2 NJ M :σ ( E l ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π l(m) :σ ( I) Γ, x :σ NJ M :τ Γ NJ λx.m :σ τ ( (W) Γ NJ M :σ x dom(γ) Γ, x :τ NJ M :σ ( I) Γ NJ M :σ Γ NJ M :τ Γ NJ (M, N) :σ τ ( E r ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π r(m) :τ E) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ N : Γ NJ MN :τ

36 UnB 2007 p. 13/2 Decorating NJ (A) x :σ NJ x :σ (X) Γ 1, x :σ 1, y :σ 2, Γ 2 NJ M :σ Γ 1, y :σ 2, x :σ 1, Γ 2 NJ M :σ ( E l ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π l(m) :σ ( I) Γ, x :σ NJ M :τ Γ NJ λx.m :σ τ ( (W) Γ NJ M :σ x dom(γ) Γ, x :τ NJ M :σ ( I) Γ NJ M :σ Γ NJ M :τ Γ NJ M :σ τ ( E r ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ π r(m) :τ E) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ N : Γ NJ MN :τ

37 UnB 2007 p. 13/2 Decorating NJ (A) x :σ NJ x :σ (X) Γ 1, x :σ 1, y :σ 2, Γ 2 NJ M :σ Γ 1, y :σ 2, x :σ 1, Γ 2 NJ M :σ ( E l ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ M :σ ( I) Γ, x :σ NJ M :τ Γ NJ λx.m :σ τ ( (W) Γ NJ M :σ x dom(γ) Γ, x :τ NJ M :σ ( I) Γ NJ M :σ Γ NJ M :τ Γ NJ M :σ τ ( E r ) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ M :τ E) Γ NJ M :σ τ Γ NJ N : Γ NJ MN :τ

38 UnB 2007 p. 14/2 IT (A) x :σ IT x :σ (X) Γ 1, x :σ 1, y :σ 2, Γ 2 IT M :σ Γ 1, y :σ 2, x :σ 1, Γ 2 IT M :σ ( E l ) Γ IT M :σ τ Γ IT M :σ ( I) Γ, x :σ IT M :τ Γ IT λx.m :σ τ ( (W) Γ IT M :σ x dom(γ) Γ, x :τ IT M :σ ( I) Γ IT M :σ Γ IT M :τ Γ IT M :σ τ ( E r ) Γ IT M :σ τ Γ IT M :τ E) Γ IT M :σ τ Γ IT N :σ Γ IT MN :τ

39 UnB 2007 p. 15/2 IT IT is usually presented in the literature in a different style.

40 UnB 2007 p. 15/2 IT IT is usually presented in the literature in a different style. Contexts are sets of pairs {x 1 : σ 1,...,x n : σ n }, and the three rules (A),(W),(X) are replaced by: (A) x : σ Γ Γ NJ x : σ

41 UnB 2007 p. 15/2 IT IT is usually presented in the literature in a different style. Contexts are sets of pairs {x 1 : σ 1,...,x n : σ n }, and the three rules (A),(W),(X) are replaced by: (A) x : σ Γ Γ NJ x : σ The two formulations are equivalent.

42 UnB 2007 p. 15/2 IT IT is usually presented in the literature in a different style. Contexts are sets of pairs {x 1 : σ 1,...,x n : σ n }, and the three rules (A),(W),(X) are replaced by: (A) x : σ Γ Γ NJ x : σ The two formulations are equivalent. Since we are interested to explore the structures of the proofs, we need to express explicitly the structural rules.

43 UnB 2007 p. 16/2 Properties of IT IT characterizes the strongly normalizable terms

44 UnB 2007 p. 16/2 Properties of IT IT characterizes the strongly normalizable terms IT is undecidable

45 UnB 2007 p. 16/2 Properties of IT IT characterizes the strongly normalizable terms IT is undecidable IT has the principal typing property: if a term M can be typed then it has a principal typing such that all and only their typings can be obtained from it by means of suitable operations

46 UnB 2007 p. 17/2 The problem Is there a logical foundation for IT?

47 UnB 2007 p. 17/2 The problem Is there a logical foundation for IT? i.e.

48 UnB 2007 p. 17/2 The problem Is there a logical foundation for IT? i.e. is there a logic such that IT can be obtained from it through a decoration?

49 UnB 2007 p. 18/2 Refining NJ NJr is a type assignment for λ-terms with pairs.

50 UnB 2007 p. 18/2 Refining NJ NJr is a type assignment for λ-terms with pairs. NJr splits the original conjunction of NJ into two.

51 UnB 2007 p. 18/2 Refining NJ NJr is a type assignment for λ-terms with pairs. NJr splits the original conjunction of NJ into two. : synchronous conjunction that keeps giving type to M, identical to N.

52 UnB 2007 p. 18/2 Refining NJ NJr is a type assignment for λ-terms with pairs. NJr splits the original conjunction of NJ into two. : synchronous conjunction that keeps giving type to M, identical to N. &: asynchronous conjunction that gives type to the pair (M,N), since M and N are distinct.

53 UnB 2007 p. 18/2 Refining NJ NJr is a type assignment for λ-terms with pairs. NJr splits the original conjunction of NJ into two. : synchronous conjunction that keeps giving type to M, identical to N. &: asynchronous conjunction that gives type to the pair (M,N), since M and N are distinct. Synchronous conjunction and the intersection have the same symbol: the two connectives are strongly related.

54 UnB 2007 p. 19/2 NJr (A) x : σ NJr x : σ (W) Γ NJr M : σ x dom(γ) Γ, x : τ NJr M : σ ( I) Γ NJr M : σ Γ NJr M : τ Γ NJr M : σ τ ( E l ) Γ NJr M : σ τ Γ NJr M : σ (&E l ) ( I) Γ NJr M : σ&τ Γ NJr π l (M) : σ Γ, x : σ NJr M : τ Γ NJr λx.m : σ τ (X) Γ 1, x : σ 1, y : σ 2, Γ 2 NJr M : σ Γ 1, y : σ 2, x : σ 1, Γ 2 NJr M : σ (&I) Γ NJr M : σ Γ NJr N : τ Γ NJr (M, N) : σ&τ ( E r ) Γ NJr M : σ τ Γ NJr M : τ (&E r ) Γ NJr M : σ&τ Γ NJr π r (M) : τ ( E) Γ NJr M : σ τ Γ NJr N : σ Γ NJr MN : τ

55 UnB 2007 p. 20/2 NJr Intuitively, NJr identifies derivations of NJ which are synchronous w.r.t. the introduction and the elimination of the implication.

56 UnB 2007 p. 20/2 NJr Intuitively, NJr identifies derivations of NJ which are synchronous w.r.t. the introduction and the elimination of the implication. merges sub-deductions where is introduced or eliminated in the same points, namely, up to the use of the two kinds of conjunctions.

57 UnB 2007 p. 20/2 NJr Intuitively, NJr identifies derivations of NJ which are synchronous w.r.t. the introduction and the elimination of the implication. merges sub-deductions where is introduced or eliminated in the same points, namely, up to the use of the two kinds of conjunctions. IT is a sub-system of NJr where only synchronous conjunction is used.

58 NJr Intuitively, NJr identifies derivations of NJ which are synchronous w.r.t. the introduction and the elimination of the implication. merges sub-deductions where is introduced or eliminated in the same points, namely, up to the use of the two kinds of conjunctions. IT is a sub-system of NJr where only synchronous conjunction is used. ISL gets rid of λ-terms to get the same properties as IT. UnB 2007 p. 20/2

59 UnB 2007 p. 21/2 The logical system ISL Formulae of ISL are formulas of NJr. Contexts are finite sequences of such formulae.

60 UnB 2007 p. 21/2 The logical system ISL Formulae of ISL are formulas of NJr. Contexts are finite sequences of such formulae. An atom is a pair A : (Γ;α).

61 UnB 2007 p. 21/2 The logical system ISL Formulae of ISL are formulas of NJr. Contexts are finite sequences of such formulae. An atom is a pair A : (Γ;α). Molecule M = [A 1,..., A n ]: a finite multiset of atoms such that the contexts in all atoms have the same cardinality.

62 ISL [(α i ; α i ) 1 i r] (A) M N M (P) [(Γ i ; β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i, α i ; β i ) 1 i r] (W) [(Γ i 1, β i, α i, Γ i 2; σ i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i 1, α i, β i, Γ i 2; σ i ) 1 i r] (X) [(Γ i, α i ; β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; α i β i ) 1 i r] ( I) [(Γ i ; α i β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; α i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; β i ) 1 i r] ( E) [(Γ i ; α i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; α i &β i ) 1 i r] (&I) UnB 2007 p. 22/2

63 UnB 2007 p. 23/2 ISL [(Γ i ; α i &β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; α i ) 1 i r] (&E L ) [(Γ i ; α i &β i ) 1 i r] [(Γ i ; β i ) 1 i r] (&E R ) M [(Γ;α), (Γ; β)] M [(Γ;α β)] ( I) M [(Γ;α β)] M [(Γ;α)] ( E L ) M [(Γ;α β)] M [(Γ;β)] ( E R )

64 UnB 2007 p. 24/2 Example [(α, β; α), (α, β; β)]

65 UnB 2007 p. 24/2 Example [(α, β; α), (α, β; β)] [(α, β; α)], [(α, β; β)]

66 UnB 2007 p. 24/2 Example [(α, β; α), (α, β; β)] [(α, β; α)], [(α, β; β)] [(α; α)], [(β; β)] [(α, β; α)], [(β, α; β)] (W) [(α, β; α)], [(α, β; β)] (X) (&I) [(α, β; α&β)]

67 UnB 2007 p. 25/2...and back By decorating ISL, we obtain a typed programming language for discrete polymorphism, a longstanding open problem.

68 UnB 2007 p. 26/2 ISL and NJ Let M i = [(Γ i 1;α1),...,(Γ i i m i ;αm i i )] for 1 i n. Then ISL M 1 : (M 1 )...M n : (M n ) if and only if Γ i j NJr M i : αj i That is, a molecule represents a set of synchronous proofs of NJ.

69 UnB 2007 p. 26/2 ISL and NJ Let M i = [(Γ i 1;α1),...,(Γ i i m i ;αm i i )] for 1 i n. Then ISL M 1 : (M 1 )...M n : (M n ) if and only if Γ i j NJr M i : αj i That is, a molecule represents a set of synchronous proofs of NJ. ISL is a logic internalizing the difference between synchronicity and asynchronicity in NJ.

70 UnB 2007 p. 27/2 ISL and IT Let M i = [(Γ i 1; α i 1),..., (Γ i m i ; α i m i )] for 1 i n and suppose that ISL M 1 : (M 1 )... M n : (M n ) where M i doesn t have any occurrence of π 1, π 2 or (.,.) and M i doesn t have any occurrence of the connective. Then Γ i j IT M i : α i j

71 UnB 2007 p. 27/2 ISL and IT Let M i = [(Γ i 1; α i 1),..., (Γ i m i ; α i m i )] for 1 i n and suppose that ISL M 1 : (M 1 )... M n : (M n ) where M i doesn t have any occurrence of π 1, π 2 or (.,.) and M i doesn t have any occurrence of the connective. Then Γ i j IT M i : α i j Γ IT M : α implies ISL M : [(Γ) ; α]

72 UnB 2007 p. 27/2 ISL and IT Let M i = [(Γ i 1; α i 1),..., (Γ i m i ; α i m i )] for 1 i n and suppose that ISL M 1 : (M 1 )... M n : (M n ) where M i doesn t have any occurrence of π 1, π 2 or (.,.) and M i doesn t have any occurrence of the connective. Then Γ i j IT M i : α i j Γ IT M : α implies ISL M : [(Γ) ; α] ISL is strongly normalizable.

73 UnB 2007 p. 28/2 The intersection The implication ( ) is the adjoint of the conjunction (&): [( ;A&B C)] [( ;A B C)].

74 UnB 2007 p. 28/2 The intersection The implication ( ) is the adjoint of the conjunction (&): [( ;A&B C)] [( ;A B C)]. Does the intersection has also an adjoint ( )?

75 UnB 2007 p. 28/2 The intersection The implication ( ) is the adjoint of the conjunction (&): [( ;A&B C)] [( ;A B C)]. Does the intersection has also an adjoint ( )? If the answer is yes, there exists a function f, of two arguments: f : A B C that can take one at a time, independently: f : A B C

76 UnB 2007 p. 28/2 The intersection The implication ( ) is the adjoint of the conjunction (&): [( ;A&B C)] [( ;A B C)]. Does the intersection has also an adjoint ( )? If the answer is yes, there exists a function f, of two arguments: f : A B C that can take one at a time, independently: f : A B C Impossible since A and B are not at all independent: they are labelled by the same variable x.

77 UnB 2007 p. 28/2 The intersection The implication ( ) is the adjoint of the conjunction (&): [( ;A&B C)] [( ;A B C)]. Does the intersection has also an adjoint ( )? If the answer is yes, there exists a function f, of two arguments: f : A B C that can take one at a time, independently: f : A B C Impossible since A and B are not at all independent: they are labelled by the same variable x. Hence the system ISL gives a nice way of describing conjunction: it is a connective that has an asynchronous behavior.

78 UnB 2007 p. 29/2 Future work Operational semantics.

79 UnB 2007 p. 29/2 Future work Operational semantics. Sequent calculus.

80 UnB 2007 p. 29/2 Future work Operational semantics. Sequent calculus. Proof nets.

81 UnB 2007 p. 29/2 Future work Operational semantics. Sequent calculus. Proof nets. ISL IT λ-calculus Strongly Normalizing λ-terms