The effect of spontaneous mutations on competitive ability
|
|
- Allyson O’Brien’
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 doi: /jeb SHORT COMMUNICATION The effect of spontaneous mutations on competitive ability S. SCHAACK*, D. E. ALLEN, L.C.LATTAIV*,K.K.MORGAN & M. LYNCH *Department of Biology, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA Centre for Evolutionary Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA Keywords: competition; Daphnia; fitness; mutation. Abstract Understanding the impact of spontaneous mutations on fitness has many theoretical and practical applications in biology. Although mutational effects on individual morphological or life-history characters have been measured in several classic genetic model systems, there are few estimates of the rate of decline due to mutation for complex fitness traits. Here, we estimate the effects of mutation on competitive ability, an important complex fitness trait, in a model system for ecological and evolutionary genomics, Daphnia. Competition assays were performed to compare fitness between mutationaccumulation (MA) lines and control lines from eight different genotypes from two populations of Daphnia pulicaria after 30 and 65 generations of mutation accumulation. Our results show a fitness decline among MA lines relative to controls as expected, but highlight the influence of genomic background on this effect. In addition, in some assays, MA lines outperform controls providing insight into the frequency of beneficial mutations. Introduction Although the phenotypic effects of spontaneous mutation are thought to be, on average, deleterious (Mukai, 1964), empirical estimates of the fitness consequences of spontaneous mutation are primarily limited to classic model organisms about which little is known ecologically (e.g. Dobzhansky et al., 1952; Kibota & Lynch, 1996; Keightley & Caballero, 1997; Schultz et al., 1999; reviewed in Eyre-Walker & Keightley, 2007), and the variability among genotypes and species is largely unknown (but see Baer et al., 2007 and Keightley et al., 2009). Previous work indicates that the average effects of spontaneous mutations may, indeed, differ markedly among strains and species (Simmons & Crow, 1977; Fry et al., 1996, 1999; Fernandez & Lopez-Fanjul, 1996; Wayne & Mackay, 1998; reviewed in Lynch et al., 1999; Baer et al., 2005; Haag-Liautard et al., 2007). Further, despite the typical decline in trait values observed under standard laboratory conditions due to Correspondence: Sarah Schaack, Department of Biology, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA. Tel.: ; fax: ; schaack@reed.edu mutation accumulation (Houle et al., 1994), differential performance in more natural or variable environments has shown a broader distribution of fitness effects, including beneficial effects (Kondrashov & Houle, 1994; Roles & Conner, 2008; Rutter et al., 2012). Lastly, the relationship between the rate of decline for individual morphological, performance or life-history traits to an overall decline in fitness is difficult to disentangle (Huey et al., 2003). In part, this is because little is known about the ecology of many model species, but also because a change in one trait, for example feeding rate, can have beneficial or deleterious consequences for fitness depending on conditions. Here, we assay competitive ability, a composite fitness trait, between mutation-accumulation (MA) lines and control lines from multiple genotypes from two different populations of Daphnia pulicaria. MA lines provide a powerful approach for estimating the rate and effects of mutation because individual lines are propagated by single progeny, thereby minimizing the influence of selection and capturing the spontaneous mutations as they occur (Lynch, 1985; Halligan & Keightley, 2009). Further, members of the genus Daphnia (Branchiopoda) are among the best understood 451
2 452 S. SCHAACK ET AL. model systems in ecology in which it is also possible to estimate mutation rates and effects (Lynch et al., 1998; Vassilieva & Lynch, 1999). The recent completion of the whole genome sequence for Daphnia pulex (Daphnia Genomics Consortium, 2011) has accompanied the growing utility of this group for ecological and evolutionary genomics (Schaack, 2008). By comparing the relative fitness of MA and control lines of D. pulicaria, we can estimate the mean and distribution of effects of accumulated mutations on competitive ability. Such estimates allow us to better understand how evolutionary forces, such as natural selection and genetic drift, shape genetic variation over time. (a) Materials and methods Mutation-accumulation experiment Ten Daphnia pulicaria genotypes from each of two permanent populations, Klamath Lake and Lake Marie (Oregon, USA), were collected and isolated into individual beakers. All animals were maintained under uniform environmental conditions (18 C, 12L/12D light cycle, in filtered lake water, fed Scenedesmus spp. maintained in culture in the laboratory) in a controlled environmental chamber. Each genotype was allowed to reproduce asexually (producing clonal offspring) until ten genetically identical individuals were available. Single individuals were then placed in beakers to start ten lines per genotype (2 populations 9 10 genotypes 9 10 lines = 200 lines total). Lines were genotyped (Morgan et al., 2001) and maintained by single-progeny descent by randomly choosing individual offspring from the second clutch produced each generation. Previous generations were kept as backups until the subsequent generation was propagated in case individuals died or were sterile. In this manner, the 10 lines starting from each genotype diverged due to the accumulation of nonlethal and nonsterilizing mutations resulting from the minimization of selection and maximization of genetic drift due to single-offspring propagation of the lines. Control representatives of each genotype were maintained in large populations at 7 C and 12L/12D light cycle, conditions designed to slow the generation time and reduce mutational divergence. (b) Fig. 1 Mean per-generation selection coefficient estimates for competitive ability based on comparisons of mutationaccumulation (MA) and control lines for Daphnia pulicaria from Lake Marie (a) and Klamath Lake (b). Estimates for each MA line-control pair are plotted, with each colour representing lines initiated from the same starting genotype (A, B, C, D and E from Lake Marie and X, Y and Z from Klamath Lake). Lake Marie lines that were also assayed in generation 69 are denoted by asterisks. Error bars are SE. Competition assays After approximately 30 generations, MA lines from five genotypes (A, B, C, D and E) from Lake Marie were randomly chosen (between 1 and 9 MA lines per genotype, n = 21; see Figure 1a) for competition assays against control lines that had been initiated from each of the starting genotypes and maintained in parallel (see previous Methods). For the assays, all MA and control lines were maintained under constant conditions in beakers for two generations prior to initiating the competition experiments to ensure that maternal environmental effects would not contribute to differences in competitive performance. Two replicates of each pair were assayed. The same type of paired competition assays were conducted using randomly selected lines (n = 16) from three genotypes from the Klamath Lake experiment (X, Y, and Z; see Figure 1b) after approximately 65 generations of mutation accumulation. Two replicates each from a subset of lines from a
3 Effect of mutations on competitive ability 453 single Lake Marie genotype (n = 4) were assayed after an average of 30 generations of mutation accumulation and after an average of 69 generations of mutation accumulation to compare the competitive performance of MAs to controls. Competition assays were conducted by placing ten genetically identical individuals from a given line, derived from either MA or control conditions, in each of two paired 3 L jars. Animals were maintained in 2.5 L of filtered lake water with a food resource (Scenedesmus algae) at a starting density of approximately cells/ml. All jars were kept in a controlled environmental chamber at 18 C and a 12 L/12 D light cycle. No additional food was added during the course of the experiment. Thus, resources were initially abundant and gradually declined over the course of the experiment. Under these conditions, Daphnia reproduce asexually, with populations initially increasing in size as they utilize the available resources, and declining as the resources are depleted. Within each pair, the entire population of individuals from the MA or control line were isolated and switched to their respective paired jar (e.g. the MA population was removed from its jar and placed in the jar that previously contained the control population) every other day, such that the total resources were shared without actual mixing of the MA and control Daphnia. Under this design, the resource use of the control animals impacts the resources available to the MA animals, and vice versa, with a brief time delay. Every other day, all Daphnia were strained out of each jar using a fine mesh screen. While on the screen, all individuals were counted using a dissecting scope before being moved to their competitor s resource in the paired jar. In the experiment comparing MA and control lines from genotypes derived from Lake Marie, jars were maintained indefinitely until one jar of each pair went extinct (maximum of 120 days). Because there were very few survivors at the tail end of this experiment, we truncated the second experiment (using Klamath Lake genotypes) after 35 days of competition. Analysis To measure the competitive ability of each MA line relative to its control, each pair of jars was analysed separately by weighted least squares regression of log(p/ (1 p)) on days of competition (up to 120 days for Lake Marie pairs and up to 35 days for Klamath Lake pairs), where p is the proportion of MA individuals in the competing pair of MA and control individuals (p = N m /(N m + N c ), with N m = the number of MA individuals and N c = the number of control individuals counted every other day (Crow & Kimura, 1970). Data points were weighted by the expected sampling variance of the population (1/[N m + N c 9 p(1 p)]), such that data points including greater numbers of individuals carried more weight. This was necessary, as the number of individuals was small early and late in the experiments, making the ratio sensitive to small changes in the number of individuals at these time points. In the absence of a selective advantage or disadvantage of mutations, the proportion of MA and control animals in each competing pair should remain constant over time. The regression slope value is an estimate of the selection coefficient on the MA line and a regression slope that differs significantly from zero indicates a difference in competitive performance between the MA line and its control (defined as relative fitness on available resources). Negative slopes signify reduced MA fitness, and positive slopes signify enhanced MA fitness, relative to control lines. We estimated the per-generation selection coefficient for each line by dividing the slope by the line-specific number of generations of mutation accumulation that had occurred. The pergeneration selection coefficients were averaged across the lines assayed from each population, and a sign test was used to test whether the number of negative versus positive slopes was greater than expected by chance alone. To assess the potential for variability in selection coefficients among genotypes within a population, we used a mixed-effects nested analysis of variance (NANOVA) with lines (treated as a random effect) nested within genotypes (treated as a fixed effect; Bates et al., 2012). Estimating the significance of fixed effects under restricted maximum likelihood is difficult because the denominator degrees of freedom used to penalize certainty are unknown. Therefore, we determined the significance of the fixed effect of genotype by estimating upper- and lower-bound P-values, which provide anti-conservative and conservative P-value estimates, respectively (Tremblay & Ransijn, 2012). To test for differences among the two populations, we used a two-sample t- test assuming unequal variances based on the genotype-specific estimates of selection coefficients estimated from the NANOVA. To test for differences in selection coefficients between the Marie Lake lines that were assayed at both 30 and 69 generations, we used a paired t-test to compare the average of two replicates for each subline assayed at each time point. Results The average per-generation selection coefficient for the Lake Marie MA lines was ( SE), and the distribution of selection coefficients was negatively skewed (Sign Test: 16 of 17, P = ), indicating MA lines were typically outcompeted by control lines (Figure 1a). There were significant differences in selection coefficients among genotypes within Lake Marie (NANOVA: upper bound, F 4,39 = 2.86, P = ; lower bound, F 4,29 = 2.86, P = ). For the subset
4 454 S. SCHAACK ET AL. of lines from Lake Marie for which assays were performed after 30 and 69 generations, a difference was observed in per-generation selection coefficients [ and , respectively; paired t-test, t 3 = 2.70, P = (one-tailed) and P = (two-tailed); Figure 2]. In Klamath Lake-derived MA lines, the same pattern is observed (Figure 1b), with a mean per-generation selection coefficient of ( SE) and the majority of competition pairs having negative slopes (Sign Test: 9 of 11, P = ). There were also significant differences in selection coefficients among Klamath Lake genotypes (NANOVA: upper bound, F 2,29 = 5.56, P = ; lower bound, F 2,21 = 5.56, P = ). A difference in selection coefficients between the two populations overall was observed with a onetailed (two-sample t-test: t 6 = 2.05, P = ), but not a two-tailed test (two-sample t-test: t 6 = 2.45, P = ). Among lines derived from both populations, there were some assays during which MA lines had positive selection coefficients relative to controls, indicating better performance after mutation accumulation. Discussion Mean per generation selection coefficient against competitive ability Generations 69 Generations Fig. 2 Mean per-generation selection coefficient estimates for competitive ability from the four Lake Marie lines assayed after 30 and 69 generations. Error bars are SE. Our results show that Daphnia pulicaria with accumulated spontaneous mutations experience a significant decline in competitive ability relative to their respective controls. The difference in this decline between genotypes from the two starting populations, Lake Marie and Klamath Lake, may be related to differences in the mutation rate of simple life-history traits, such as fecundity, which have been reported between these two populations (Latta et al., in press). Specifically, the fitness assays of MA lines from genotypes isolated from Klamath Lake revealed a rate of decline for clutch size that was an order of magnitude lower than in the Marie population (Latta et al., in press). Thus, differences in genomic background among populations may explain the smaller selection coefficients found for Klamath lines in the competition assays performed here. An alternative explanation for the difference in mean per-generation selection coefficients is the timing of the assays for each population (after 30 and 65 generations, respectively, for Marie and Klamath lines). Older MA lines could exhibit lower mean per-generation selection coefficients if extinction bias (loss of most mutated lines over times) reduces the mean over time. On the other hand, older MA lines may exhibit a lower mean fitness if the interacting effects of accumulated mutations magnify fitness declines, often referred to as mutational meltdown (Lynch & Gabriel, 1990). To distinguish among these hypotheses (differences due to the unique genomic background of each population versus the timing of the assays), we can compare selection coefficients based on assays with genotypes from Lake Marie that were conducted after both 30 and 69 generations of mutation accumulation. In this subset of lines, the mean per-generation selection coefficient from the assay on older lines is 179 greater than the early assay, suggesting synergistic epistasis may lead to mutational meltdown over time (Figure 2). These data are limited, but they support the hypothesis that differences are more likely due to genomic background than timing of the assays. In addition to the trends indicating overall differences in the effect of mutations on competitive ability among the two populations, within each population, there were significant differences in per-generation selection coefficients among genotypes. This variation supports several studies that indicate major differences in mutation rates within species (e.g. Haag-Liautard et al., 2007; Sharp & Agrawal, 2012), but contrasts with the majority of studies in which little intraspecific variation has been found (Keightley et al., 2009; Salomon et al., 2009; Denver et al., 2012; and Xu et al., 2012). The net effect of accumulated mutations in D. pulicaria across all lines assayed was deleterious in 67.6% of the lines (proportion of significant negative slopes), neutral in 24.3% (proportion of nonsignificant slopes) and beneficial in 8.1% (proportion of significant positive slopes). The observation that a small proportion of mutant lines exceeded the performance of the original genotype (control lines) is congruent with recent studies demonstrating fitness benefits of mutation when composite fitness traits are measured and assays are performed in competitive environments outside the laboratory (Roles & Conner, 2008; Rutter et al., 2012). It is worth noting that regardless of their positive or negative effect, all mutations initially arise
5 Effect of mutations on competitive ability 455 in the heterozygous state. In Daphnia, mutations in the heterozygous state cannot become homozygous until sex occurs. Thus, the fate of new mutations, and those in this experiment, depends on their heterozygous effect and will be observed only to the extent that mutations are partially dominant (Simmons & Crow, 1977; Charlesworth & Hughes, 1996). Acknowledgments We would like to thank Emilia Martins and John Postlethwait for comments on the manuscript. Thanks to Casse Weaver for conducting a pilot study. This work was funded by fellowships from National Institute of Health Training (5 T32 GM07413) and National Science Foundation (NSF) grant (DBI ) to KKM. Funding also provided by M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust Grant and NSF (MCB ) grants to SS and NSF grant (DEB ) and NIH grant (R01 GM036827) to ML. References Baer, C.F., Shaw, F., Steding, C., Baumgartner, M., Hawkins, A., Houppert, A. et al Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: Baer, C.F., Miyamoto, M.M. & Denver, D.R Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version Charlesworth, B. & Hughes, K.A Age-specific inbreeding depression and components of genetic variance in relation to the evolution of senescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93: Crow, J.F. & Kimura, M An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York, NY. Daphnia Genomics Consortium The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 331: Denver, D.R., Wilhelm, L.J., Howe, D.K., Gafner, K., Dolan, P.C. & Baer, C.F Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genome Biol. Evol. 4: Dobzhansky, T., Spassky, B. & Spassky, N A comparative study of mutation rates in two ecologically diverse species of Drosophila. Genetics 37: Eyre-Walker, A. & Keightley, P.D The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: Fernandez, J. & Lopez-Fanjul, C Spontaneous mutational variance and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: Fry, J.D., Heinsohn, S.L. & Mackay, T.F.C The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: Fry, J.D., Keightley, P.D., Heinsohn, S.L. & Nuzhdin, S.V New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: Haag-Liautard, C., Dorris, M., Maside, X., Macaskill, S., Halligan, D.L., Houle, D. et al Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445: Halligan, D.L. & Keightley, P.D Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: Houle, D., Hughes, K.A., Hoffmaster, D.K., Ihara, J., Assimacopoulos, S., Canada, D. et al The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. Genetics 138: Huey, R.B., Gilchrist, G.W., Ward, K., Maves, L., Pepin, D. & Houle, D Mutation accumulation, performance, fitness. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43: Keightley, P.D. & Caballero, A Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: Keightley, P.D., Trivedi, U., Thomson, M., Oliver, F., Kumar, S. & Blaxter, M.L Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Res. 19: Kibota, T. & Lynch, M Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in Escherichia coli. Nature 381: Kondrashov, A.S. & Houle, D Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 258: Latta, L.C.IV, Morgan, K., Weaver, C.S., Allen, D.E., Schaack, S. & Lynch, M. in press. The effect of genomic background and generation time on deleterious mutation in natural populations of Daphnia. Genetics. Lynch, M Spontaneous mutations for life history characters in an obligate parthenogen. Evolution 39: Lynch, M. & Gabriel, W Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44: Lynch, M., Latta, L., Hicks, J. & Giorgianni, M Mutation, selection, and the maintenance of life-history variation in natural populations. Evolution 52: Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D., Kibota, T., Schultz, S., Vassilieva, L. et al Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53: Morgan, K.K., Hicks, J., Spitze, K., Latta, L., Pfrender, M., Ottone, C. et al Patterns of genetic architecture for life-history traits and molecular markers in a subdivided species. Evolution 55: Mukai, T The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50: Roles, A.J. & Conner, J.K Fitness effects of mutation accumulation in a natural outbred population of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum): comparison of field and greenhouse environments. Evolution 62: Rutter, M.T., Roles, A., Conner, J.K., Shaw, R.G., Shaw, F.H., Schneeberger, K. et al Fitness of Arabidopsis thaliana mutation accumulation lines whose spontaneous mutations are known. Evolution 66: Salomon, M.P., Ostrow, D., Phillips, N., Blanton, D., Bour, W., Keller, T. et al Comparing mutational and standing
6 456 S. SCHAACK ET AL. genetic variability for fitness and size in Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans. Genetics 183: 1 8. Schaack, S Perspective: Daphnia comes of age: an ecological model in the genomic era. Mol. Ecol. 17: Schultz, S.T., Lynch, M. & Willis, J.H Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96: Sharp, N.P. & Agrawal, A.F Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: Simmons, M.J. & Crow, J.F Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11: Tremblay, A. & Ransijn, J LMER Convenience Functions: a suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. R package version org/package=lmerconveniencefunctions. Vassilieva, L.L. & Lynch, M The rate of spontaneous mutation for life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 151: Wayne, M.L. & Mackay, T.F.C Quantitative genetics of ovariole number in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutational variation and genotype-environment interaction. Genetics 148: Xu, S., Schaack, S., Seyfert, A., Choi, E., Lynch, M. & Cristescu, M High mutation rates in the mitochondrial genomes of Daphnia pulex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: Received 10 September 2012; revised 23 October 2012; accepted 24 October 2012
GENOMIC BACKGROUND AND GENERATION TIME INFLUENCE DELETERIOUS MUTATION RATES IN DAPHNIA
Genetics: Advance Online Publication, published on November 26, 2012 as 10.1534/genetics.112.146571 1 GENOMIC BACKGROUND AND GENERATION TIME INFLUENCE DELETERIOUS MUTATION RATES IN DAPHNIA LEIGH C. LATTA
More informationDivining God's mutation rate
Commentary Cellscience Reviews Vol 3 No 4 ISSN 1742-8130 Divining God's mutation rate Charles F. Baer Department of Zoology, 223 Bartram Hall, P. O. Box 118525, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL,
More informationSpontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 11393 11398, September 1999 Evolution Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana STEWART T. SCHULTZ*,MICHAEL LYNCH, AND JOHN H. WILLIS *Department
More informationMutation, Selection, and the Maintenance of Life-History Variation in a Natural Population
Mutation, Selection, and the Maintenance of Life-History Variation in a Natural Population Michael Lynch; Leigh Latta; Justin Hicks; Matthew Giorgianni Evolution, Vol. 52, No. 3. (Jun., 1998), pp. 727-733.
More informationMutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions in Drosophila melanogaster
Genet. Res., Camb. (2004), 83, pp. 7 18. With 5 figures. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 7 DOI: 10.1017/S0016672303006505 Printed in the United Kingdom Mutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
Perspective: Spontaneous Deleterious Mutation Author(s): Michael Lynch, Jeff Blanchard, David Houle, Travis Kibota, Stewart Schultz, Larissa Vassilieva, John Willis Source: Evolution, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Jun.,
More informationEdinburgh Research Explorer
Edinburgh Research Explorer Fitness effects of new mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii across two stress gradients Citation for published version: Kraemer, SA, Morgan, AD, Ness, R, Keightley, P & Colegrave,
More informationOn the expected relationship between inbreeding, fitness, and extinction
Genet. Sel. Evol. 38 (2006) 371 387 371 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2006 DOI: 10.1051/gse:2006010 Original article On the expected relationship between inbreeding, fitness, and extinction Konstantinos THEODOROU
More informationDELETERIOUS MUTATION IN RELATED SPECIES OF THE PLANT GENUS AMSINCKIA WITH CONTRASTING MATING SYSTEMS
Evolution, 59(11), 2005, pp. 2370 2377 DELETERIOUS MUTATION IN RELATED SPECIES OF THE PLANT GENUS AMSINCKIA WITH CONTRASTING MATING SYSTEMS DANIEL J. SCHOEN Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205
More informationNew Mutations: Condition-Dependent Rates and Sex-Specific Effects
New Mutations: Condition-Dependent Rates and Sex-Specific Effects by Nathaniel Philip Sharp A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Graduate Department
More informationWright-Fisher Models, Approximations, and Minimum Increments of Evolution
Wright-Fisher Models, Approximations, and Minimum Increments of Evolution William H. Press The University of Texas at Austin January 10, 2011 1 Introduction Wright-Fisher models [1] are idealized models
More informationGenetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic
doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00739.x Genetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic J. MASEL Department of
More informationPerspective: Spontaneous Deleterious Mutation
Perspective: Spontaneous Deleterious Mutation Michael Lynch; Jeff Blanchard; David Houle; Travis Kibota; Stewart Schultz; Larissa Vassilieva; John Willis Evolution, Vol. 53, No. 3. (Jun., 1999), pp. 645-663.
More informationMutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution
Mutation, Selection, Gene Flow, Genetic Drift, and Nonrandom Mating Results in Evolution 15.2 Intro In biology, evolution refers specifically to changes in the genetic makeup of populations over time.
More informationLecture WS Evolutionary Genetics Part I 1
Quantitative genetics Quantitative genetics is the study of the inheritance of quantitative/continuous phenotypic traits, like human height and body size, grain colour in winter wheat or beak depth in
More informationPROPERTIES OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONAL VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE FOR WING SIZE AND SHAPE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01838.x PROPERTIES OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONAL VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE FOR WING SIZE AND SHAPE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER David Houle 1,2 and Janna Fierst 1,3
More informationKimura, Maruyama, and Crow (1) first noted that mildly deleterious
Metapopulation extinction caused by mutation accumulation Kevin Higgins* and Michael Lynch Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Edited by James F. Crow,
More informationMutation is a sufficient and robust predictor of genetic variation for mitotic spindle traits
Genetics: Early Online, published on June 22, 2016 as 10.1534/genetics.115.185736 1 1 2 Mutation is a sufficient and robust predictor of genetic variation for mitotic spindle traits in C. elegans 3 4 5
More informationTHE CONTRIBUTION OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS TO THERMAL SENSITIVITY CURVE VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA SERRATA
ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12392 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS TO THERMAL SENSITIVITY CURVE VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA SERRATA Camille A. L. Latimer, 1 Katrina McGuigan, 1 Robbie S. Wilson,
More informationGenetic erosion and persistence of biodiversity
Genetic erosion and persistence of biodiversity Kuke Bijlsma Population & Conservation Genetics Evolutionary Genetics Wageningen 21-11-2006 Biodiversity crisis: human impact Habitat deterioration, habitat
More informationCoevolution of competitors
Coevolution of competitors 1) Coevolution 2) Ecological character displacement 3) Examples 4) Criteria for character displacement 5) Experiments on selection and evolution 6) Convergent character displacement
More informationThe distribution of fitness effects of new mutations
The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations Adam Eyre-Walker* and Peter D. Keightley Abstract The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations is a fundamental entity in genetics that
More informationTesting for spatially-divergent selection: Comparing Q ST to F ST
Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on August 17, 2009 as 10.1534/genetics.108.099812 Testing for spatially-divergent selection: Comparing Q to F MICHAEL C. WHITLOCK and FREDERIC GUILLAUME
More informationPredicting Fitness Effects of Beneficial Mutations in Digital Organisms
Predicting Fitness Effects of Beneficial Mutations in Digital Organisms Haitao Zhang 1 and Michael Travisano 1 1 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston TX 77204-5001 Abstract-Evolutionary
More informationHow robust are the predictions of the W-F Model?
How robust are the predictions of the W-F Model? As simplistic as the Wright-Fisher model may be, it accurately describes the behavior of many other models incorporating additional complexity. Many population
More informationEvolution of phenotypic traits
Quantitative genetics Evolution of phenotypic traits Very few phenotypic traits are controlled by one locus, as in our previous discussion of genetics and evolution Quantitative genetics considers characters
More informationA SIMPLE METHOD TO ACCOUNT FOR NATURAL SELECTION WHEN
Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on September 14, 2008 as 10.1534/genetics.108.090597 Title: A SIMPLE METHOD TO ACCOUNT FOR NATURAL SELECTION WHEN PREDICTING INBREEDING DEPRESSION
More informationSmall fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genet. Res., Camb. (2003), 82, pp. 19 31. With 5 figures. f 2003 Cambridge University Press 19 DOI: 10.1017/S001667230300630X Printed in the United Kingdom Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions
More informationTHREE distinct ultimate causes are currently recognized
Copyright Ó 2006 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.046847 Joint Evolution of Dispersal and Inbreeding Load Frédéric Guillaume 1 and Nicolas Perrin 2 Department of Ecology and
More informationReproduction and Evolution Practice Exam
Reproduction and Evolution Practice Exam Topics: Genetic concepts from the lecture notes including; o Mitosis and Meiosis, Homologous Chromosomes, Haploid vs Diploid cells Reproductive Strategies Heaviest
More informationThe Mechanisms of Evolution
The Mechanisms of Evolution Figure.1 Darwin and the Voyage of the Beagle (Part 1) 2/8/2006 Dr. Michod Intro Biology 182 (PP 3) 4 The Mechanisms of Evolution Charles Darwin s Theory of Evolution Genetic
More informationEvolutionary Theory. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A.
Evolutionary Theory Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations Sean H. Rice Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A. Contents Preface ix Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 Selection on One
More informationSTABILIZING SELECTION ON HUMAN BIRTH WEIGHT
STABILIZING SELECTION ON HUMAN BIRTH WEIGHT See Box 8.2 Mapping the Fitness Landscape in Z&E FROM: Cavalli-Sforza & Bodmer 1971 STABILIZING SELECTION ON THE GALL FLY, Eurosta solidaginis GALL DIAMETER
More informationOhio Tutorials are designed specifically for the Ohio Learning Standards to prepare students for the Ohio State Tests and end-ofcourse
Tutorial Outline Ohio Tutorials are designed specifically for the Ohio Learning Standards to prepare students for the Ohio State Tests and end-ofcourse exams. Biology Tutorials offer targeted instruction,
More information1. they are influenced by many genetic loci. 2. they exhibit variation due to both genetic and environmental effects.
October 23, 2009 Bioe 109 Fall 2009 Lecture 13 Selection on quantitative traits Selection on quantitative traits - From Darwin's time onward, it has been widely recognized that natural populations harbor
More informationBreeding Values and Inbreeding. Breeding Values and Inbreeding
Breeding Values and Inbreeding Genotypic Values For the bi-allelic single locus case, we previously defined the mean genotypic (or equivalently the mean phenotypic values) to be a if genotype is A 2 A
More informationMajor questions of evolutionary genetics. Experimental tools of evolutionary genetics. Theoretical population genetics.
Evolutionary Genetics (for Encyclopedia of Biodiversity) Sergey Gavrilets Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-6 USA Evolutionary
More informationEvolution and the Genetics of Structured populations. Charles Goodnight Department of Biology University of Vermont
Evolution and the Genetics of Structured populations Charles Goodnight Department of Biology University of Vermont Outline What is Evolution Evolution and the Reductionist Approach Fisher/Wright Controversy
More informationOVERVIEW. L5. Quantitative population genetics
L5. Quantitative population genetics OVERVIEW. L1. Approaches to ecological modelling. L2. Model parameterization and validation. L3. Stochastic models of population dynamics (math). L4. Animal movement
More informationANALYSIS OF CHARACTER DIVERGENCE ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS AND OTHER COVARIATES
ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00063.x ANALYSIS OF CHARACTER DIVERGENCE ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS AND OTHER COVARIATES Dean C. Adams 1,2,3 and Michael L. Collyer 1,4 1 Department of
More informationContents PART 1. 1 Speciation, Adaptive Radiation, and Evolution 3. 2 Daphne Finches: A Question of Size Heritable Variation 41
Contents List of Illustrations List of Tables List of Boxes Preface xvii xxiii xxv xxvii PART 1 ear ly problems, ea r ly solutions 1 1 Speciation, Adaptive Radiation, and Evolution 3 Introduction 3 Adaptive
More informationPOWER AND POTENTIAL BIAS IN FIELD STUDIES OF NATURAL SELECTION
Evolution, 58(3), 004, pp. 479 485 POWER AND POTENTIAL BIAS IN FIELD STUDIES OF NATURAL SELECTION ERIKA I. HERSCH 1 AND PATRICK C. PHILLIPS,3 Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of
More informationEvolutionary Genetics
Evolutionary Genetics LV 25600-01 Lecture with exercises 6KP Natural Selection HS2018 The importance of the great principle of selection mainly lies in the power of selecting scarcely appreciable differences,
More informationSWEEPFINDER2: Increased sensitivity, robustness, and flexibility
SWEEPFINDER2: Increased sensitivity, robustness, and flexibility Michael DeGiorgio 1,*, Christian D. Huber 2, Melissa J. Hubisz 3, Ines Hellmann 4, and Rasmus Nielsen 5 1 Department of Biology, Pennsylvania
More informationChapter 6 Population and Community Ecology
Chapter 6 Population and Community Ecology Friedland and Relyea Environmental Science for AP, second edition 2015 W.H. Freeman and Company/BFW AP is a trademark registered and/or owned by the College Board,
More information(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!)
POPULATION GENETICS AND MICROEVOLUTIONARY THEORY FINAL EXAMINATION (Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!) 1. Briefly define (5 points each): a) Average
More informationThere are 3 parts to this exam. Use your time efficiently and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY EXAM #1 Fall 2017 There are 3 parts to this exam. Use your time efficiently and be sure to put your name on the top of each page. Part I. True (T) or False (F) (2 points each). Circle
More informationProcesses of Evolution
15 Processes of Evolution Forces of Evolution Concept 15.4 Selection Can Be Stabilizing, Directional, or Disruptive Natural selection can act on quantitative traits in three ways: Stabilizing selection
More informationThe theory of evolution continues to be refined as scientists learn new information.
Section 3: The theory of evolution continues to be refined as scientists learn new information. K What I Know W What I Want to Find Out L What I Learned Essential Questions What are the conditions of the
More informationInbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character. Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande
Inbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande Inbreeding depression Reduction in fitness of inbred vs. outbred individuals Outcrossed
More informationFitness landscapes and seascapes
Fitness landscapes and seascapes Michael Lässig Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Cologne Thanks Ville Mustonen: Cross-species analysis of bacterial promoters, Nonequilibrium evolution of
More informationClassical Selection, Balancing Selection, and Neutral Mutations
Classical Selection, Balancing Selection, and Neutral Mutations Classical Selection Perspective of the Fate of Mutations All mutations are EITHER beneficial or deleterious o Beneficial mutations are selected
More informationThere are 3 parts to this exam. Take your time and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY BIOS 30305 EXAM #2 FALL 2011 There are 3 parts to this exam. Take your time and be sure to put your name on the top of each page. Part I. True (T) or False (F) (2 points each). 1)
More informationThe Wright Fisher Controversy. Charles Goodnight Department of Biology University of Vermont
The Wright Fisher Controversy Charles Goodnight Department of Biology University of Vermont Outline Evolution and the Reductionist Approach Adding complexity to Evolution Implications Williams Principle
More informationCurriculum Map. Biology, Quarter 1 Big Ideas: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes (BIO1.LS1)
1 Biology, Quarter 1 Big Ideas: From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes (BIO1.LS1) Focus Standards BIO1.LS1.2 Evaluate comparative models of various cell types with a focus on organic molecules
More informationChapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity. Sunday, October 1, 17
Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity CHAPTER INTRO: The Dung of the Devil Read and Answer Questions Provided Module 14 The Biodiversity of Earth After reading this module you should be able to understand
More information1. Draw, label and describe the structure of DNA and RNA including bonding mechanisms.
Practicing Biology BIG IDEA 3.A 1. Draw, label and describe the structure of DNA and RNA including bonding mechanisms. 2. Using at least 2 well-known experiments, describe which features of DNA and RNA
More informationQuantitative-Genetic Models and Changing Environments
Bürger R & Krall C (2004). Quantitative-Genetic Models and Changing Environments. In: Evolutionary Conservation Biology, eds. Ferrière R, Dieckmann U & Couvet D, pp. 171 187. Cambridge University Press.
More informationBig Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life
BIG IDEA! Big Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life Key Terms for this section: emigration phenotype adaptation evolution phylogenetic tree adaptive radiation fertility
More informationSymbiotic Sympatric Speciation: Compliance with Interaction-driven Phenotype Differentiation from a Single Genotype
Symbiotic Sympatric Speciation: Compliance with Interaction-driven Phenotype Differentiation from a Single Genotype Kunihiko Kaneko (Univ of Tokyo, Komaba) with Tetsuya Yomo (Osaka Univ.) experiment Akiko
More informationEcology and evolution. Limnology Lecture 2
Ecology and evolution Limnology Lecture 2 Outline Lab notebooks Quick and dirty ecology and evolution review The Scientific Method 1. Develop hypothesis (general models) Null hypothesis Alternative hypothesis
More informationThe Evolution of Sex Chromosomes through the. Baldwin Effect
The Evolution of Sex Chromosomes through the Baldwin Effect Larry Bull Computer Science Research Centre Department of Computer Science & Creative Technologies University of the West of England, Bristol
More informationMATHEMATICAL MODELS - Vol. III - Mathematical Modeling and the Human Genome - Hilary S. Booth MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE HUMAN GENOME
MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE HUMAN GENOME Hilary S. Booth Australian National University, Australia Keywords: Human genome, DNA, bioinformatics, sequence analysis, evolution. Contents 1. Introduction:
More informationEVOLUTION change in populations over time
EVOLUTION change in populations over time HISTORY ideas that shaped the current theory James Hutton & Charles Lyell proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took place over extremely long
More informationNatal versus breeding dispersal: Evolution in a model system
Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1999, 1: 911 921 Natal versus breeding dispersal: Evolution in a model system Karin Johst 1 * and Roland Brandl 2 1 Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle Ltd, Department
More informationNatural Selection: For the Birds
Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Natural Selection: For the Birds Adapted from a Discovery Institute CUNY lesson (http://discovery.csi.cuny.edu/pdf/lessonplandraft.pdf) Overview
More informationBiology Unit Overview and Pacing Guide
This document provides teachers with an overview of each unit in the Biology curriculum. The Curriculum Engine provides additional information including knowledge and performance learning targets, key
More informationDensity-dependent natural selection does not increase efficiency
Evolutionary Ecology, 1990, 4, 290-297 Density-dependent natural selection does not increase efficiency LAURENCE D. MUELLER Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, lrvine,
More informationCHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection
CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection 1. Genetic variation occurs within and between populations 2. Mutation and sexual recombination
More informationTheory a well supported testable explanation of phenomenon occurring in the natural world.
Evolution Theory of Evolution Theory a well supported testable explanation of phenomenon occurring in the natural world. Evolution the process by which modern organisms changed over time from ancient common
More informationGenetically Engineering Yeast to Understand Molecular Modes of Speciation
Genetically Engineering Yeast to Understand Molecular Modes of Speciation Mark Umbarger Biophysics 242 May 6, 2004 Abstract: An understanding of the molecular mechanisms of speciation (reproductive isolation)
More informationRAPID EVOLUTION IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
University of Florida Center for Precollegiate Education and Training Drowsy Drosophila: RAPID EVOLUTION IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE DROWSY DROSOPHILA: RAPID EVOLUTION IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Authors:
More information19. Genetic Drift. The biological context. There are four basic consequences of genetic drift:
9. Genetic Drift Genetic drift is the alteration of gene frequencies due to sampling variation from one generation to the next. It operates to some degree in all finite populations, but can be significant
More informationEVOLUTION change in populations over time
EVOLUTION change in populations over time HISTORY ideas that shaped the current theory James Hutton (1785) proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took place over extremely long periods
More informationPHENOTYPIC evolution is channeled through patterns
Copyright Ó 2007 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.069658 Neutral Evolution of Multiple Quantitative Characters: A Genealogical Approach Cortland K. Griswold,* Benjamin Logsdon,1
More informationReproduction- passing genetic information to the next generation
166 166 Essential Question: How has biological evolution led to the diversity of life? B-5 Natural Selection Traits that make an organism more or less likely to survive in an environment and reproduce
More informationFitness. Fitness as Survival and Fertility. Secondary article
Troy Day, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sarah P Otto, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Fitness is a measure of the survival and reproductive success of an entity. This entity
More informationEVOLUTION. HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time.
EVOLUTION HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time. James Hutton & Charles Lyell proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took
More informationWHERE DOES THE VARIATION COME FROM IN THE FIRST PLACE?
What factors contribute to phenotypic variation? The world s tallest man, Sultan Kosen (8 feet 1 inch) towers over the world s smallest, He Ping (2 feet 5 inches). WHERE DOES THE VARIATION COME FROM IN
More informationLinking levels of selection with genetic modifiers
Linking levels of selection with genetic modifiers Sally Otto Department of Zoology & Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia @sarperotto @sse_evolution @sse.evolution Sally Otto Department
More informationEffective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation
FunDamental concepts in genetics Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation Brian Charlesworth Abstract The effective size of a population,, determines the rate of change
More informationMolecular evolution - Part 1. Pawan Dhar BII
Molecular evolution - Part 1 Pawan Dhar BII Theodosius Dobzhansky Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution Age of life on earth: 3.85 billion years Formation of planet: 4.5 billion
More informationEnduring understanding 1.A: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over time is evolution.
The AP Biology course is designed to enable you to develop advanced inquiry and reasoning skills, such as designing a plan for collecting data, analyzing data, applying mathematical routines, and connecting
More informationAn introduction to quantitative genetics
An introduction to quantitative genetics 1. What is the genetic architecture and molecular basis of phenotypic variation in natural populations? 2. Why is there phenotypic variation in natural populations?
More informationEvolution 1 Star. 6. The different tools used during the beaks of finches lab represented. A. feeding adaptations in finches
Name: Date: 1. ccording to modern evolutionary theory, genes responsible for new traits that help a species survive in a particular environment will usually. not change in frequency. decrease gradually
More informationExercise 3 Exploring Fitness and Population Change under Selection
Exercise 3 Exploring Fitness and Population Change under Selection Avidians descended from ancestors with different adaptations are competing in a selective environment. Can we predict how natural selection
More informationSELECTION FOR ASYMMETRICAL BIAS IN A BEHAVIOURAL CHARACTER OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. DAVID J. PURNELL* and JAMES N. THOMPSON, Jr.
Heredity (1973), 31(3), 401-405 NOTES AND COMMENTS SELECTION FOR ASYMMETRICAL BIAS IN A BEHAVIOURAL CHARACTER OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER DAVID J. PURNELL* and JAMES N. THOMPSON, Jr. University of Cambridge,
More informationThe Origin of Species
The Origin of Species Introduction A species can be defined as a group of organisms whose members can breed and produce fertile offspring, but who do not produce fertile offspring with members of other
More informationGenetic Variation: The genetic substrate for natural selection. Horizontal Gene Transfer. General Principles 10/2/17.
Genetic Variation: The genetic substrate for natural selection What about organisms that do not have sexual reproduction? Horizontal Gene Transfer Dr. Carol E. Lee, University of Wisconsin In prokaryotes:
More informationChapter 6 Population and Community Ecology. Thursday, October 19, 17
Chapter 6 Population and Community Ecology Module 18 The Abundance and Distribution of After reading this module you should be able to explain how nature exists at several levels of complexity. discuss
More informationDarwinian Selection. Chapter 6 Natural Selection Basics 3/25/13. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection
Chapter 6 Natural Selection Basics Natural Selection Haploid Diploid, Sexual Results for a Diallelic Locus Fisher s Fundamental Theorem Darwinian Selection v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution
More informationQ2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus. Q8 (Biology) (4.6)
Q1 (4.6) What is variation? Q2 (4.6) Put the following in order from biggest to smallest: Gene DNA Cell Chromosome Nucleus Q3 (4.6) What are genes? Q4 (4.6) What sort of reproduction produces genetically
More informationLecture 14 Chapter 11 Biology 5865 Conservation Biology. Problems of Small Populations Population Viability Analysis
Lecture 14 Chapter 11 Biology 5865 Conservation Biology Problems of Small Populations Population Viability Analysis Minimum Viable Population (MVP) Schaffer (1981) MVP- A minimum viable population for
More informationSelection on Correlated Characters (notes only)
Selection on Correlated Characters (notes only) The breeder s equation is best suited for plant and animal breeding where specific traits can be selected. In natural populations selection is rarely directed
More informationRise and Fall of Mutator Bacteria
Rise and Fall of Mutator Bacteria The Evolution of Mutation Rates in Bacteria Yoav Ram Hadany Evolutionary Theory Lab 29 May 2011 Bacteria Bacteria are unicellular, haploid and asexual Reproduce by binary
More informationA A A A B B1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR EACH BIG IDEA WITH ASSOCIATED SCIENCE PRACTICES AND ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE Learning Objectives will be the target for AP Biology exam questions Learning Objectives Sci Prac Es Knowl
More informationEcological Determinants of Mutation Load and Inbreeding Depression in Subdivided Populations
vol. 176, no. 2 the american naturalist august 2010 Ecological Determinants of Mutation Load and Inbreeding Depression in Subdivided Populations Aneil F. Agrawal * Department of Ecology and Evolutionary
More information2. Overproduction: More species are produced than can possibly survive
Name: Date: What to study? Class notes Graphic organizers with group notes Review sheets What to expect on the TEST? Multiple choice Short answers Graph Reading comprehension STRATEGIES Circle key words
More informationSupplementary Figures.
Supplementary Figures. Supplementary Figure 1 The extended compartment model. Sub-compartment C (blue) and 1-C (yellow) represent the fractions of allele carriers and non-carriers in the focal patch, respectively,
More informationHomework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring Homework Part I: Phylogenetics:
Homework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring 2009. Homework Part I: Phylogenetics: Introduction. The objective of this assignment is to understand the basics of phylogenetic relationships
More information