REVEGETATION TRENDS AND LESSONS MONTANA COAL

Similar documents
Seeded Lower Grasslands

Thompson Nicola Fraser Middle Grasslands

BEC Correlation BGxh2 01, 02, 05, 06. Site Characteristics

BEC Correlation Old field guide IDFdk1a 91,92 & 93 BGxh2 06 BGxw 06. Site Characteristics. Soils Black chernozems on morainal blanket.

Description This type exists as two distinct communities:

(Taeniatherum caput-medusae)

Montana s Noxious Weeds: Integrated Weed Management

The Invasion of False Brome in Western Oregon

LESSON FOUR: Rangeland Plant Classification

POPULATION TRENDS FOR TULARE PSEUDOBAHIA AND STRIPED ADOBE LILY

Integrated Management Strategies for Perennial Pepperweed

Types and Categories of

Wyoming Big Sagebrush Sites Fire/Land Treatment Study Overview

Control. Crabgrass. in Georgia Hayfields

Review of Riparian Function Riparian Management Riparian Monitoring

EBIPM Curriculum. Unit Pre/Post test. Module 1 Test. Rangeland ecosystems

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Lecture 24 Plant Ecology

One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you

Mapping for Successful Management. Kayla Malone Chaffee County Noxious Weed Department Supervisor

Wyoming big sagebrush Associations of Eastern Oregon; Vegetation Attributes

VEGETATION EVA BOEHRINGER

SEEDING FORAGE KOCHIA ONTO CHEATGRASS-INFESTED RANGELANDS

Weed Management in Reclamation Reclamation 101. Brian A. Mealor Weed Extension Specialist University of Wyoming

Hickory Hills Park: Invasive Species Management Plan Prepared by Colton Johnson, Animal Ecology, Iowa State University.

It is relatively simple to comprehend the characteristics and effects of an individual id fire. However, it is much more difficult to do the same for

Earth s Major Terrerstrial Biomes. *Wetlands (found all over Earth)

GROUND DISTURBANCE AND REVEGETATION GUIDELINES

LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN THE SOUTHWEST: Historical changes in selected ecosystems of the southwestern United States

Upper Owyhee Watershed Assessment

3 Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems BIGIDEA Write the Big Idea for this chapter.

Variability of Crested Wheatgrass Production

Assisted colonization of native forbs the use of climate-adjusted provenances. Sue McIntyre

Description: Shrub-carrs

Instream Erosion Control General

Lesson Plan for Santa Rita Experimental Range Vegetation Monitoring Martha Gebhardt, Outreach Coordinator

Use of Bioengineering Techniques for Revegetation of Riparian Areas: Colomac Mine Remediation Project, NWT

Response of Annual and Perennial Grass Growth, Energy Reserves and Fuels Accumulation to Climatic Variation

NSW MINING Health, Safety, Environment & Community

REMEDIATION OF THE MILLTOWN DAM SEDIMENTS IN MONTANA

Autecology of Hood s Phlox on the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie

Assembling information to develop ecological site and state and transition concepts. Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM

Evaluating Wildlife Habitats

Chapter 3. Description of the Study Area. Karl Taboga, James Stafford and Paul Taucher 3-19

Eva Strand and Leona K. Svancara Landscape Dynamics Lab Idaho Coop. Fish and Wildlife Research Unit

Weed Identification and Control. Jim Wanstall NMDA State Noxious Weed Coordinator

Duralie Open Pit Modification

Ecology for Planting Design - understanding long-term plant performance. (C) Noel Kingsbury 2016

Utilization. Utilization Lecture. Residue Measuring Methods. Residual Measurements. 24 October Read: Utilization Studies and Residual Measurements

The Effect of Water Stress on the Efficacy of Mesotrione to Control Weeds in Cool-season Turfgrass Stands

% control June 2005 Aminopyralid Aminopyralid Aminopyralid Picloram

Crossword puzzles! Activity: stratification. zonation. climax community. succession. Match the following words to their definition:

Butterfly Report

April 9, Phosphate Mining and Reclamation Overview

Briggs Lake Water Quality Report 2014

Assessing Effectiveness of Management Actions on Recovery of CSS Plant Communities Over-Time

Ecological Succession

Autecology of Broom Snakeweed on the Northern Mixed Grass Prairie

Lower Owyhee Watershed Assessment

Chapter 7 Part III: Biomes

SUCCESSION Community & Ecosystem Change over time

Modeling Economic and Ecological Benefits of Post-Fire Revegetation in the Great Basin: an Application of Markov Processes*

Biomes There are 2 types: Terrestrial Biomes (on land) Aquatic Biomes (in the water)

JEFFERSON COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD 380 Jefferson Street, Port Townsend Ext. 205

Weeds, Exotics or Invasives?

Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments

PLANT RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE

Biology and Management of Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) R.J. Smeda, S.A. Riley

Thorns, Prickles, Spines - The characteristics make the plant less likely to be grazed by large herbivores; not effective against insect herbivores.

SUMMER NECTAR AND FLORAL SOURCES

Environmental Science: Biomes Test

Wheat Rice Corn The parts are often very small Diagnostic microscope Magnifies to 45 x Compound microscope Magnifies to 400 x

Conceptual model Source: Knight, 1994

Plant Community Recovery Following Restoration in Semiarid Grasslands

Do Native Plant Mixtures Reduce Invasions Along Roadsides in Wisconsin? Joslyn Mink MS Candidate University of Wisconsin-Madison

Controlling Big Sagebrush with Growth Regulators

Why Sample Vegetation? Vegetation Sampling. Vegetation Sampling Metrics. Enumeration and Density

TRADITIONAL AND FIRE- RELATED SILVICULTURAL TECHNIQUES TO REGENERATE OAK RESULTS FROM NC SITE OF THE REGIONAL OAK STUDY

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

Evaluation of Plant Species Shift on Fertilized Native Rangeland

Bushfire Risk Management and how it affects Revegetation Design

Changing soils to manage plant

Turfgrass Tolerance and Weed Control with Mesotrione

Representative Reference Area Akehurst, Venner meadow, Burnette lake, Fork meadow, paradise meadow, Rimrock swamp, Goose Carex,

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

Dynamic and Succession of Ecosystems

Biomes Section 2. Chapter 6: Biomes Section 2: Forest Biomes DAY ONE

Ecological Succession

Mechanism of interaction pasture components. Division of Forage Science and Pasture Technology

1. Case Study: Senescence of Kwongan Heath

Succession. Main types of changes (see Morin 13-1) in community/ecosystem properties that you should know:

Assessing Long-term Impact of Leafy Spurge Biological Control Agents: Conclusions from a 6-year study

Plant responses to climate change in the Negev

C1 Weeds in North Queensland

Bees: The most important pollinators

Habitat Monitoring Update Hudson River CAG November 16, 2017

Restoring Meanders to Straightened Rivers 1.7 Reconnecting remnant meanders

Bees and Human Landscapes: The Turf Lawn. By: Ian Lane Department of Entomology, UMN

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Monitoring Restoration of the Vaseux-Bighorn National Wildlife Area Following Pipeline Construction

Transcription:

REVEGETATION TRENDS AND LESSONS MONTANA COAL

The secret of managing is to keep the guys who hate you away from the guys who are undecided. Casey Stengel

Can't anybody here play this game? Casey Stengel

MONKEY SEE MONKEY DO

SPRING CREEK AND DECKER COAL MINES SOUTH CENTRAL MT 3500 ELEV. (1,070 m) 10.8 (27 CM) ANNUAL PRECIP. ~ CLAY LOAM 3 SUBSTRATES: SPOIL, SCORIA, SALVAGED TOPSOIL

SCM HAS 9 MAJOR SEED MIXES MAY USE SEVERAL IN ONE FIELD E.G., 1 OR 2 UPLAND ALLUVIAL SPECIAL SUBSTRATES SHRUB MOSAICS

COAL DISTURBANCE MT 63 mi 2 = 163 km 2 0.2% OF CROPLAND 28,000 mi 2 = 73,000 km 2

SMCRA 1977 REVEG. DIVERSE, EFFECTIVE, PERMANENT NATIVE SPP. EXCEPT PASTURES PREMINE COVER AND PROD. CONTROL EROSION

COAL RECLAMATION BECOMES THE CRUCIBLE FOR WESTERN REVEGETATION

MT COAL AND URANIUM MINE RECLAMATION WEAKENED 2003 STILL REQUIRES PERIODIC MONITORING and CORRECTIVE MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT OR AS THE DATA INDICATE

MINIMUM 10 YEAR TO EVALUATE PHASE 3 BOND RELEASE

Table 10. Shrub survival as a function of field age, Sodic Overburden Test Plots. AGE (YRS.) 4 Suitable Fill 8 Suitable Fill INDIV/HA (% SURVIVAL) 4 8,370 (100) 17,700 (100)

Table 10. Shrub survival as a function of field age, Sodic Overburden Test Plots. AGE (YRS.) 4 Suitable Fill 8 Suitable Fill INDIV/HA (% SURVIVAL) 4 8,370 (100) 17,700 (100) 7 7,490 (89) 10,350 (58)

Table 10. Shrub survival as a function of field age, Sodic Overburden Test Plots. AGE (YRS.) 4 Suitable Fill 8 Suitable Fill INDIV/HA (% SURVIVAL) 4 8,370 (100) 17,700 (100) 7 7,490 (89) 10,350 (58) 10 2,580 (29) 2,670 (15)

Table 10. Shrub survival as a function of field age, Sodic Overburden Test Plots. AGE (YRS.) 4 Suitable Fill 8 Suitable Fill INDIV/HA (% SURVIVAL) 4 8,370 (100) 17,700 (100) 7 7,490 (89) 10,350 (58) 10 2,580 (29) 2,670 (15) 11 2,460 (29) 2,520 (19)

1000 DAYS

Table 1. Premine (baseline) vegetational attributes, SCCM. VEGETATION TYPE PERENNIAL PERENNIAL SHRUB COVER PSC DENSITY % KG/HA* INDIV/HA** Steppe Types (minor) 43 800 700 Sagebrush Types 48 625 8,400 (3,400/A) * Air dried; excluding tree productivity. Multiply by 0.89 for pounds/acre. ** For shrubs/acre divide by 2.47.

Table 2. Technical vegetation standards, SCCM. Revegetation must meet 90% of the standards with 0.1 Type 1 error. PERFORMANCE GRAZING WILDLIFE PARAMETER LAND HABITAT SHRUB DENSITY 1,110/HA 5,740/HA PERENNIAL COVER 50% 46% PEAK STANDING CROP 775 KG/HA NA

TURNING TO TRENDS GENERALIZATIONS THAT MAKE THE COMPLICATED APPEAR SIMPLE

60 Canopy Coverage 50 40 30 20 Annual Forbs Annual Grasses Perennial Grasses 3X Annual Precip. 10 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Growth Form Dynamic South Fork Spring Creek, Bighorn Co., MT

40 RELATIVE GROWTH FORM ABUNDANCE 35 Percent Canopy Coverage 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Annual Forbs Annual Grasses Perennial Grasses

FOCUS ON 3 TRENDS FOR BOND RELEASE PERENNIAL COVER PERENNIAL PRODUCTIVITY SHRUB DENSITY

Kg/Ha 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 PERENNIAL PSC TRENDS IN REVEGETATION 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

16.0 PRECIPITATION TRENDS SCM Annual Precipitation Inches 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1980S 1990S 2000S 2010S

80 PERENNIAL C COVERAGE IN REVEGETATION 70 Percent Canopy Coverage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

100 GROUND COVER PREMINE AND REVEG PERCENT COVER 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 PREMINE REVEG 0 BARE GROUND ROCK FRAGMENTS PLANT LITTER TOTAL

TREND: SHRUB DENSITY DECLINES WITH TIME. 82% SURVIVAL AT THE CONCLUSION OF SAMPLING PAR 5

PAR 1B ST3

QUICK LOOK AT 3 SPP. CHEATGRASS WESTERN WHEATGRASS SHEEP FESCUE

2007 PRECIP. 13.2

2008 PRECIP. 10.7

2012 PRECIP. 10.5

2015 PRECIP. 11.5

TOPSOIL STOCKPILE SCM

TOPSOIL STOCKPILE DCM

DCM C HILLS

CHEATGRASS COVER IN REVEGETATION SCCM 30 PERCENT RELATIVE COVER 25 20 15 10 5 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

WESTERN WHEATGRASS REVEG ALL STAR ORIGINATES LOCALLY VIGOROUS RHIZ. SPREAD

In the 2007 monitoring at DCM, 80% of perennial cover (relative cover) came from a single species: Western Wheatgrass.

PAR 3 SEEDED 1997 PAR 1G SEEDED 10/06 AND 4/11

2007

PAR 5 2015

30 WESTERN WHEATGRASS C COVER SCCM PERCENT RELATIVE COVER 25 20 15 10 5 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

SHEEP FESCUE REVEG ALL STAR INTRODUCED TO U.S. SMALL TUFTED BUNCHGRASS SPREADS BY COPIOUS SEED PRODUCTION

SEEDED 1990 PHOTO 2012

SHEEP FESCUE COVER SEEDED 50 45 PERCENT RELATIVE COVER 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

20 SHEEP FESCUE COVER UNSEEDED PERCENT CANOY COVERAGE 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 YOUNG MID 10+ YEARS FIELD AGE

NO TIME FOR HOW TO GROW SHRUBS FROM SEED NEXT 3 PHOTOS FROM A SINGLE FIELD, DIFFERENT SEEDINGS

PAR 2F

DEALING WITH ANNUAL BIENNIAL WEED PATCHES IN REVEGETATION

TYPICAL PROGRESSION IN A POOR SEEDING KOCHIA TUMBLEMUSTARD CHEATGRASS

Kochia roots 2 weeks

MANAGE TO PREVENT KOCHIA DON T LEAVE COVERSOIL UNSEEDED ANY LONGER THAN NECESSARY ERADICATE KOCHIA RESERVES ON THE MINE

KOCHIA MOW IT RELEASE OVERTOPPED PERENNIALS KOCHIA CAN STILL PRODUCE SEED

KILL KOCHIA WITH GLYPHOSATE AND A WEED WIPE

CAN TRY INTERSEEDING IF SOME KIND OF SEEDBED PAR 5B CHEATGRASS SEEDED 4 11

FULLY INTERSEEDED 5 YEARS AFTER ORIGINAL SEEDING PAR 1G

ANNUAL BIENNIAL FORBS AND CHEATGRASS PRE EMERGENT CHEMICAL CONTROL FOLLOWED BY LITTER REDUCTION THEN SEEDING

B HILLS

C HILLS

SKIP ONE GROWING SEASON SEED IN SPRING JUST WESTERN AND CHENOPOD SHRUBS

SEED TOO SOON CHEMICALS INHIBIT THE SEEDING SEED TOO LATE WEEDS RETURN WITH THE PERENNIALS

THERE ARE OTHER LESSONS