Squaw Creek. General Information

Similar documents
Big Wood River. General Information

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

5/4/2017 Fountain Creek. Gage Analysis. Homework 6. Clifton, Cundiff, Pour, Queen, and Zey CIVE 717

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Geomorphology Studies

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Gravel Transport Study Report for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix J. Vermont Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curves

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

Landscape Development

Sediment Transport Analysis for Stream Restoration Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

6.1 Water. The Water Cycle

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Rivers and Streams. Streams. Hydrologic Cycle. Drainage Basins and Divides. Colorado River Drainage Basin. Colorado Drainage Basins.

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JANUARY 2005 STORM, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No )

Quantifying the Effects of Livestock Grazing on Suspended Sediment and Stream Morphology

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Stream Classification

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

THE CASPAR CREEK EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED. Thomas Lisle, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Arcata, Califorina

Morphologically based model of bed load transport capacity in a headwater stream

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Impacts of Upstream Disturbances on Downstream Sediment Yield and Morphology in the Presence of Best Management Practices

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

APPENDIX A. Watershed Delineation and Stream Network Defined from WMS

Technical Memorandum No

Surface Water and Stream Development

HEC-6 Modeling of the Main Stem of the Kankakee River in Illinois from the Stateline Bridge to the Kankakee Dam

Chehalis Basin Strategy

Kaskaskia Morphology Study Headwaters to Lake Shelbyville

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

SELBY CREEK STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION AND RIPARIAN REVEGETATION PROJECT: GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

OBSERVATIONS ON UNMEASURED RlVERS

The Yellow River Initiative: The Birth of a System Approach to Challenges Facing the Everglades of the North

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Henrys Fork Island Park Caldera Reach Evaluation: Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Sediment Transport

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Natural Variability in Annual Maximum Water Level and Outflow of Yellowstone Lake

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

SEDIMENT BENEFICIAL USE SUPPORT ASSESSMENT FOR OTTER CREEK

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

MISSION CREEK WATERSHED (2002 Report Year 4)

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

High-Gradient Streams

The how, why, and lessons learned

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Measuring Stream Temperature with Digital Data Loggers

Streams. Stream Water Flow

STREAM MODULES: SPREADSHEET TOOLS FOR RIVER EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING **

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION

Fine sediment in pools: an index of how sediment is affecting a stream channel

Simulating Sediment Transport in the Patapsco River following Dam Removal with Dam Removal Express Assessment Model-1 (DREAM-1)

Differentiating Mining and Non-mining Sourced Contaminants in the San Juan River Delta of Lake Powell, USA

Regional Curves of Hydraulic Geometry for Wadeable Streams. Marin and Sonoma Counties, San Francisco Bay Area. Data Summary Report.

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 5 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Appendix E Rosgen Classification

Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions along the Hangman, California, and Rock Creeks, September 30, 2009

Transcription:

General Information is a tributary to the Salmon River. It enters the north side of the river about 0 miles downstream of North Fork, Idaho. The study reach is about a 30 ft length of stream about 2 miles upstream from the mouth of, just upstream of the Papoose Creek road. The site is on land administered by the Salmon-Challis National Forest at an elevation of about 3,940 ft. The drainage area is 4.3 mi 2 and the geology of the watershed is predominantly intrusive igneous. This site is associated with an existing Forest Service gaging station. Streamflow records are available from water year 990 and 992 to 995 and sediment transport measurements are available from water year 990 to 996. Additional measurements included a survey of the stream reach and pebble counts of the substrate surface material. Figure. looking downstream at cross-section 2.

Figure 2. looking upstream from the gage. Streamflow was recorded for water years 990 and 992 through 995 typically from the beginning of the spring snowmelt hydrograph and into the fall. Estimated average annual streamflow (Q a ) for the stream is 3.89 ft 3 /s and the estimated bankfull discharge (Q b ) is 22.0 ft 3 /s. Recorded daily mean discharge for this period ranged from 0.666 ft 3 /s to 28.6 ft 3 /s.

Channel Profile and Cross-Section Figure 3 shows the longitudinal profile for the channel bed in the center of the channel, the water surface elevations along each bank at the time of the survey and bankfull flow elevations (floodplains). The average gradient for the study reach is 0.0240 ft/ft. Cross-sections of the channel were surveyed at two locations. Cross-section (XS) is located at the stream gage. 66 65 (USFS) Elevation, ft 64 63 62 Water Surface Elevation Left Edge Center of Channel Bed Elevation XS 6 Water Surface Elevation Right Edge XS2 Bankfull Elevation Left Side Bankfull Elevation Right Side 60 30 50 70 90 0 30 50 70 Distance, ft Figure 3. Longitudinal profile of the study reach in. Elevation, ft 65 64 63 Cross-section Water Surface 62 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 Distance, ft Figure 4. Cross-section of at the gaging station.

Channel Geometry Figure 4 shows the cross-section at the sediment transport measurement site (cross-section ) and the water surface at the time of the survey. The channel geometry relationships for this cross-section are shown in Figure 5. All data collected during discharge measurements in 990 through 996 were used to develop the displayed power relationships with discharge (Figure 5). Over the range of discharges when sediment transport was measured (.3 to 53.6 ft 3 /s) estimated stream width, estimated average depth and estimated average velocity varied from 5.7 to 0. ft, 0.40 to 0.95 ft, and 0.5 to 5.6 ft/s, respectively. The average reach gradient is 0.0240 ft/ft. 0 Depth and Width, ft 0 Width y = 5.642x 0.46 R 2 = 0.5 Average Velocity y = 0.450x 0.634 Average Velocity, ft/s R 2 = 0.92 Average Depth y = 0.394x 0.220 R 2 = 0.6 Average Depth Width Average Velocity 0. 0. 0 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 5. Width, average depth and average velocity versus stream discharge at the measurement cross section on. 0.

Channel Material On July 5, 994 surface pebble counts were made near cross-section. The average D 50 and D 90 for the surface substrate in the reach are 27 mm and 74 mm, respectively (Figure 6). About 3 % of the surface material was 3 mm diameter or smaller. No core samples of subsurface material were collected at this site. 80 Percent Finer 60 40 20 0 0 0 Particle Size, mm Surface Substrate Figure 6. Particle size distribution for surface material samples collected in.

Sediment Transport The bedload and suspended load measurements in water years 990 through 996 were all made in the vicinity of the gaging station. The sediment transport data include 42 (plus 5 zeros) measurements of bedload transport and 90 measurements of suspended sediment. Sediment transport measurements spanned a range of stream discharges from 0.76 ft 3 /s (0.20Q a ; 0.03Q b ) to 53.6 ft 3 /s (3.78Q a ; 2.44Q b ). Bedload transport ranged from 0.00833 to 2. t/d and suspended transport ranged from 0.0077 to 20.4 t/d. At discharges near and larger than bankfull, suspended and bedload transport account for about equal proportions of the total sediment load. At lower discharges, suspended transport accounts for the majority of the material in transport (Figure 7). 0 Sediment Transport, tons/day 0. Total Bedload y = 3.22E-04x 2.300 R 2 = 0.49 BCF=.898 Suspended y=3.330e-03x.658 R 2 = 0.70 BCF=.52 Suspended Total Bedload 0.0 Q a Q b 0.00 0. 0 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 7. Bedload and suspended load transport rate versus discharge.

The bedload transport rates by size class (Figure 8) shows that the larger rates are associated with material in the 0.5 to 2 mm diameter size class. No relationship is shown for the size class >32 mm, since only four samples contained this size of material. All four bedload samples that contained material larger than 32 mm diameter were collected at discharges of 24.6 ft 3 /s or larger. 0 Bedload Transport, tons/day 0. 0.0 0.00 0.000 <0.5 mm y =.597E-04x.875 R 2 = 0.46 0.5-2 mm y =3.032E-04x.978 R 2 = 0.4 2-8 mm y = 8.489E-05x 2.304 R 2 = 0.43 8-32 mm y = 3.20E-05x 2.459 R 2 = 0.48 Q a 0 Discharge, ft 3 /s <0.5 mm 0.5-2 mm 2-8 mm 8-32 mm >32 mm Figure 8. Bedload transport rate versus discharge for selected size classes. Q b

About 79% of the bedload samples had a median diameter between 0.5 and 2 mm (Figure 9). The largest median diameter was 5.9 mm at a discharge of 45.3 ft 3 /s. Data on the largest individual particle in bedload samples are not available for this site. However, the fact that material in the 6 to 32 mm diameter class or larger occurred in all the bedload samples collected at discharges larger than 2 ft 3 /s, provides some evidence that the median diameter of surface substrate material may be in motion at discharges near bankfull. D 50 Surface Substrate Particle Size, mm 0 R 2 = 0.34 Q a Q b Median Diameter 0. 0 Discharge, ft 3 /s Figure 9. Median size of the bedload sample versus stream discharge for.