Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018

Similar documents
AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road Suite fax Beltsville, Maryland 20705

Drake Petroleum Company, Inc. Accutest Job Number: JB Total number of pages in report:

A CASE STUDY OF THREE PETROLEUM REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES PREPARED BY: Paul Kirk OCTOBER 2017

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office at

Date 02/24/96 Page 1 Revison 4.0 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8020/8015 (MODIFIED) GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS (GRO)

Accurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID. Application Note.

August 24, Ref: Bryant M. Watson Executive Director Vermont Association of Snow Travelers, Inc. 26 VAST Lane Barre, Vermont 05641

10 May Rod Walls - Director Facilities New Construction, Sustainability Hays CISD IH 35 Kyle, Texas 78640

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2011 DUAL PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEM OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING REPORT #5 EMERSON POWER TRANSMISSION ITHACA, NEW YORK

Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME

Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose

Soil Sampling Results Former Truck Maintenance Garage

* * * * * * * November 1, Pierce County Parks and Recreation Services Department 9112 Lakewood Drive SW Lakewood, WA 98499

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM June 16, 2011

February 9, 2018 GeoInsight Project

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

TPH Methods and Measurements and Petroleum Vapor Intrusion (PVI) Risks

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Date: March 6, 2008 RWDI Reference #: W B Pages (Including Cover):

Application. Gas Chromatography February Introduction

6-24 hours e. Coliform, Fecal and Total W, DW P,G Cool, 4 C, 0.008% Na 2 S 2 O 3. Fecal Streptococci W P,G Cool, 4 C, 0.

TO-17 Extending the Hydrocarbon Range above Naphthalene for Soil Vapor and Air Samples Using Automated

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

scc Doc 812 Filed 12/04/12 Entered 12/04/12 17:00:47 Main Document Pg 1 of 56

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Copyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.

TPH (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons)

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

Vapor Intrusion Sampling Options: Performance Data for Canisters, Badges, and Sorbent Tubes for VOCs

PAHs in Parking Lot Sealcoats. Performance Study. Asphalt Based. Coal Tar Sealcoat Sealcoat. Sealcoat. Scrapings. Asphalt Based.

Chemical Oxidation of MTBE and TBA

GENERAL. Bottle Type (Mimimum required) Water/ WW Methods. Label Color SW84 6. Parameter. Holding Time. Preservative

ATTACHMENT A WEAVER BOTTOMS SEDIMENT BASIN MAINTENANCE PROJECT PROJECT REPORT SUMMARY (APRIL 7, 2014)

V#2162/ FORMER CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. STATION #70041 PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK RTN LYNN FELLS PARKWAY SAUGUS, MASSACHUSETTS 01906

Summer 2018 Semi-Annual Water Quality Monitoring Report

An Innovative Field-Based Analytical Method For Low-Level Detection of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater and Soil Samples

METHOD 8015D NONHALOGENATED ORGANICS USING GC/FID

METHOD 8015C NONHALOGENATED ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

APPLICATION NOTE. A Capillary Approach to ASTM D3606: Test Method for Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Finished Motor and Aviation Gasoline

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

SYNOPSIS OF CHANGES TO BC LABORATORY MANUAL, MARCH 2017

Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS

PREPARE YOUR SAMPLE:

May 4, Mr. Bruce Hampson Town of Wilton Miller-Driscoll School Building Committee 238 Danbury Road Wilton, Connecticut 06897

F 2: Phase 2 Soil Vapor Investigation for Potential Off Site Vapor Intrusion

September 4, Mr. Forest Arnold Maryland Department of the Environment Oil Control Program 1800 Washington Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21230

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Indoor Air Sampling and Forensic Analysis at Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town Properties October 2017

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports

Trihalomethane Formation Potential (THMFP)

GLM & Associates. February 9, 2018

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Chemical Analysis. Low Level Oxygenates Analyzer. Trace Analysis of Oxygenates in Hydrocarbon Matrices. Gas Chromatography.

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Shake-and-Shoot : A Rapid Solvent Extraction Process for PCBs and TPH 11375

LABORATORY DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST

Chemical Oxidation. Jim Harrington, Chief Training and Technical Support Section May 7, 2005

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Brant A. Smith P.E., Ph.D. Remediation Technologies (RemTech) Symposium Banff, Alberta October 14, 2015

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

2017 Annual Monitoring Report Area E (PICA-077) Groundwater and Surface Water

PROJECT ID: W09341 LABORATORY REPORT NUMBER: L

Use this checklist to properly pack your GEL sample cooler

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Gasoline Uptake Study. For: IRST Commonwealth Dr. Louisville, KY 40299

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

A STUDY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC CARBON POLLUTION ON A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS DUE TO TRAFFIC

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Containers O.Reg. 153/04 CCME (2016) O.Reg. 153/04 CCME (2016) Glass jar, Teflon lined lid Glass jar, Teflon lined lid, HDPE Protect from light.

The Application of Method TO-15 to Naphthalene Measurements in Indoor Air


Atlantic RBCA. Guidelines for Laboratories. Tier I and Tier II Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methods

FUNDERMAX GMBH TEST REPORT

RIGHT SOLUTIONS RIGHT PARTNER

Slow Release Persulfate and MultiOx Cylinders for Passive, Long term Treatment of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites

Remtech Slow Release Persulphate and MultiOx Cylinders for Passive, Long-term Treatment of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites

Soil Vapor Survey: A Gasoline Plume Beneath A Residence And The Implications For Additional Corrective Action Or Case Closure

MIP System Field Test Results for High Level TPH-GRO

RS DYNAMICS ECOPROBE 5. Portable IR/PID Gas Analyzer PID. PID and IR Analyzers

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

Maine DEP DRO. MY05TP220A(0-0.5) MY05TP222A(0-0.5) FD MY05TP223A(0-0.5) FD MY05TP220A (EB) EB-Equipment Rinsate Blank FD- Field Duplicate Samples

Ground Water & UST Samples: Containers, Preservation and Hold Times Table

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

A Micro-GC Based Chemical Analysis System

Volatile Organic Compounds in Water PBM

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

Transcription:

Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Third Quarter 2018 Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Facility I.D. No. 17166 AEC Project No. 14-059 Prepared for: Chenoweth & Associates, Inc. 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 and Maryland Department of the Environment Oil Control Program 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230 Prepared by: Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC 8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217 Jessup, Maryland 20794 Phone (301) 776-0500 Fax (301) 776-1123 October 11, 2018 Denver CO Nashville TN Philadelphia PA Richmond VA San Diego CA Washington DC

October 11, 2018 Mr. William A. Chenoweth Chenoweth & Associates, Inc. 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 Subject: Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Facility I.D. No. 17166 AEC Project No. 14-059 Dear Mr. Chenoweth: On September 27 th, 2018, Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC (AEC) completed sampling of three onsite groundwater monitoring wells, four tank field monitoring pipes, and the on-site potable drinking water well. This report includes AEC s discussion of the scope of work, methodologies, analytical results, findings and conclusions. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Chenoweth & Associates, Inc. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact the undersigned at (301) 776-0500. Sincerely, ADVANTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC Jeremy S. Sheidy Senior Project Manager Jeffery S. Stein, P.G. Principal cc: Mr. Matt Mueller, Maryland Department of the Environment

AEC Project No. 14-059 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn Page 2 Regulatory Information Regulatory Agency: Maryland Department of the Environment Agency Contact: Matthew Mueller Facility I.D. Number: 17166 MDE Case Number: 18-0496CL Current Case Status: Quarterly monitoring well, potable well, and tank field monitoring pipe sampling Reporting Period: 7-1-18 to 9-30-18 General Site Information Site Contact: William A. Chenoweth Consultant Contact: Jeremy S. Sheidy Facility Status: Operating fuel station Area Property Use: See Site Vicinity Map and Site Plan (Figures 1 and 2 in Attachment A) Monitoring Wells: MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 Tank Field Monitoring Pipes: TP-1, TP-2, TP-3, TP-4 Activities Completed this Period Sampling Date: September 27, 2018 Wells Sampled: MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, TP-1, TP-2, TP-3, TP-4, and onsite potable well LNAPL Present: No Attachments Attachment A Attachment B Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Tables Table 1 Table 2 Site Vicinity Map Site Plan Groundwater Gradient Map Groundwater Quality Map Historical Groundwater Elevation Data Historical Groundwater Analytical Results Attachment C Attachment D Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain-of-Custody Form Water Sampler Certification

AEC Project No. 14-059 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn Page 3 Introduction Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC (AEC) has completed sampling of three onsite groundwater monitoring wells, four tank field monitoring pipes, and the on-site potable well (PW). All samples were collected on September 27, 2018. Figure 1 in Attachment A illustrates the site vicinity. Figure 2 in Attachment A illustrates the groundwater monitoring wells, tank field monitoring pipes, and onsite potable drinking water well locations. The following is a description of this work and the results of the recent groundwater sampling effort. Groundwater Gauging, Sampling, and Analysis Monitoring Wells Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells and tank field monitoring pipes by first gauging and then purging at least three well volumes using a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bailer, which was cleaned prior to use in each well using a Liquinox detergent. After purging, each well was allowed to recharge for a period of at least one hour prior to sampling. The groundwater samples were collected using dedicated disposable high density polyethylene (HDPE) sampling bailers. The groundwater flow direction for the monitoring wells on the day of the sampling event is depicted in Figure 3 in Attachment A. Table 1 in Attachment B provides current and historical groundwater elevation data. The samples were transferred directly into the appropriate sample containers. The sample from each location was placed in 40-milliliter glass vials with Teflon-lined septa and/or one-liter amber glass jars. The sample containers were preserved with hydrochloric acid, as appropriate. Once collected, the samples were placed on ice in a cooler to await shipment to the laboratory. The groundwater monitoring well and tank field monitoring pipe samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including fuel oxygenates per Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Analytical Method 8260, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel range organics (DRO) and TPH gasoline range organics (GRO) per EPA Analytical Method 8015B. The results of laboratory analysis indicated that no analytes were detected above laboratory quantitation limits in samples MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3. Laboratory analytical results for sample TP-1 indicated detectable concentrations of TPH GRO and TPH DRO above their respective Generic Numeric Cleanup Standards for Type I and II Aquifers (Regulatory Standards). Laboratory analytical results show detectable concentrations of tert-amyl alcohol (TAA), diisopropyl ether (DIPE), MTBE, o-xylene, and m- & p-xylenes. All other analytes were below laboratory quantitation limits (BQL).

AEC Project No. 14-059 MDE Case No. 18-0496CL Piper s Wine & Spirit Barn Page 4 Laboratory analytical results for sample TP-2 show a detectable concentration of TPH DRO above Regulatory Standards. All other analytes were BQL. Laboratory analytical results for sample TP-3 show a detectable concentration of TPH DRO above Regulatory Standards. All other analytes were BQL. Laboratory analytical results for sample TP-4 show detectable concentrations of benzene, MTBE, TPH GRO and TPH DRO above Regulatory Standards. Laboratory analytical results show detectable concentrations of TAA, tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tert-butanol (TBA), DIPE, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, toluene, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, o-xylene, and m- & p- Xylenes. All other analytes were BQL. A Groundwater Quality Map is presented as Figure 4 in Attachment A. Table 2 in Attachment B summarizes the current and historical groundwater analytical results. Laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody documentation are included as Attachment C. On-Site Potable Well Treatment System A sample from the on-site potable well was collected from an exterior spigot. The sample was obtained after purging the system for 15 minutes. The sample was placed in 40 milliliter glass vials with Teflon-lined septa and preserved with hydrochloric acid, as appropriate. Once collected, the samples were placed on ice in a cooler to await shipment to the laboratory. The samples were analyzed for VOCs including fuel oxygenates per EPA Analytical Method 524.2. The sampling was conducted by MDE certified AEC staff scientist Brian Taetzsch (sampler ID 6403BT). Water Sampler Certification is included as Attachment D. Laboratory analytical results for the on-site potable well show that all analytes were BQL. Tank Field Monitoring Pipe Evaluation AEC performed an evaluation of the tank field monitoring pipes by screening each with a photoionization detector (PID) for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors. A plastic covering was securely fastened over each tank field monitoring pipe and was allowed to sit for a period of fifteen minutes. The plastic barrier was then punctured with the PID nozzle, and a reading was taken. A PID reading of 39.0 ppm was detected in TP-1 and a petroleum odor was noted. No readings above 0.0 parts per million (ppm) were detected in TP-2, TP-3, and TP-4. The tank field monitoring pipes were gauged to determine the depth to water, and the presence of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). No LNAPL was detected in any of the tank field monitoring pipes.

Attachment A

Site 8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217 Jessup, Maryland 20794 Phone: 301-776-0500 Fax: 301-776-1123 N 14-059 Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map Pipers Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 AEC Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: BGT October 2018

MW-3 TP-4 TP-1 MW-2 MW-1 TP-3 TP-2 8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217 Jessup, Maryland 20794 Phone: 301-776-0500 Fax: 301-776-1123 Legend: = Monitoring Well = Tank Field Monitoring Well = Potable Well Figure 2 - Site Plan Pipers Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 AEC Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 14-059 October 2018 BGT

MW-3 89.86 91.0 92.0 93.0 MW-2 92.13 MW-1 94.05 8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217 Jessup, Maryland 20794 Phone: 301-776-0500 Fax: 301-776-1123 Legend: = Monitoring Well = Potable Well = Groundwater Contour = Groundwater Flow Direction Figure 3 Groundwater Gradient Map Pipers Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 AEC Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 14-059 October 2018 BGT

Groundwater Samples Collected 9/27/2018 Samples analyzed for VOCs per EPA 8260 plus oxygenates TPH GRO/DRO per EPA 8015 VOCs in ug/l or ppb TPH GRO/DRO in mg/l or ppm <2.0 denotes an analyte not detected above the laboratory quantitation limit (limit of quantitation shown) Benzene/MTBE/GRO/DRO Bold denotes a value above the MDE Regulatory Standard MW-3 <2.0/<2.0/<0.100/<0.19 TP-4 67.0/22.7/0.561/0.53 TP-1 <2.0/2.3/0.249/0.50 TP-3 <2.0/<2.0/<0.100/1.52 MW-2 <2.0/<2.0/<0.100/<0.19 MW-1 <2.0/<2.0/<0.100/<0.20 TP-2 <2.0/<2.0/<0.100/2.19 8610 Washington Boulevard, Suite 217 Jessup, Maryland 20794 Phone: 301-776-0500 Fax: 301-776-1123 Legend: = Monitoring Well =Tank Field Monitoring Well = Potable Well Figure 4 Groundwater Quality Map Pipers Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike Manchester, Maryland 21102 AEC Project No.: Report Date: Drawn By: 14-059 October 2018 BGT

Attachment B

Table 1 - Well Gauging Summary Piper's Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike, Manchester, Maryland Well ID Date Depth to Water Depth to LPH TOC Elevation Water Elevation LPH Elevation Corrected Water Elevation LPH Thickness MW-1 5/16/2013 6.95 ND 100.00 93.05 NM NM 0.00 3/28/2014 6.65 ND 100.00 93.35 NM NM 0.00 4/22/2015 6.80 ND 100.00 93.20 NM NM 0.00 3/17/2016 6.52 ND 100.00 93.48 NM NM 0.00 3/9/2017 7.40 ND 100.00 92.60 NM NM 0.00 3/16/2018 6.90 ND 100.00 93.10 NM NM 0.00 3/29/2018 6.42 ND 100.00 93.58 NM NM 0.00 6/26/2018 6.74 ND 100.00 93.26 NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.95 ND 100.00 94.05 NM NM 0.00 MW-2 5/16/2013 5.60 ND 97.53 91.93 NM NM 0.00 3/28/2014 5.55 ND 97.53 91.98 NM NM 0.00 4/22/2015 5.56 ND 97.53 91.97 NM NM 0.00 3/17/2016 5.29 ND 97.53 92.24 NM NM 0.00 3/9/2017 5.85 ND 97.53 91.68 NM NM 0.00 3/16/2018 5.46 ND 97.53 92.07 NM NM 0.00 3/29/2018 5.38 ND 97.53 92.15 NM NM 0.00 6/26/2018 5.50 ND 97.53 92.03 NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.40 ND 97.53 92.13 NM NM 0.00 MW-3 5/16/2013 7.05 ND 93.84 86.79 NM NM 0.00 3/28/2014 6.02 ND 93.84 87.82 NM NM 0.00 4/22/2015 6.57 ND 93.84 87.27 NM NM 0.00 3/17/2016 5.51 ND 93.84 88.33 NM NM 0.00 3/9/2017 9.58 ND 93.84 84.26 NM NM 0.00 3/16/2018 7.45 ND 93.84 86.39 NM NM 0.00 3/29/2018 6.96 ND 93.84 86.88 NM NM 0.00 6/26/2018 6.41 ND 93.84 87.43 NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 3.98 ND 93.84 89.86 NM NM 0.00 TP-1 6/26/2018 5.80 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.76 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 TP-2 6/26/2018 5.75 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.28 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 TP-3 6/26/2018 5.85 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.40 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 TP-4 6/26/2018 5.59 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 9/27/2018 5.41 ND NM NM NM NM 0.00 All measurements in feet LPH = Liquid Phase Hydrocarbon TOC = Top of Casing ND = None Detected NA = Not Applicable NG = Not Gauged NM = Not Measured

Well No. Date B T E X Naphthalene MTBE TPH GRO TPH DRO MW-1 5/16/2013 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 3/28/2014 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 4/22/2015 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/17/2016 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/9/2017 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/16/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 6/26/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 <0.19 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 <0.20 MW-2 5/16/2013 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 3/28/2014 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 4/22/2015 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/17/2016 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/9/2017 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/16/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 6/26/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 <0.19 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 <0.19 MW-3 5/16/2013 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 3/28/2014 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 NS NS 4/22/2015 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/17/2016 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/9/2017 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 NS NS 3/16/2018 11.4 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 6.6 NS NS 3/29/2018 12.3 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 6.9 NS NS 6/26/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 2.9 <0.100 <0.19 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 <0.19 TFMP-1 6/26/2018 5.8 28.1 <2.0 40.0 <2.0 18.1 0.261 0.80 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 6.4 <2.0 2.3 0.249 0.50 TFMP-2 6/26/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 3.16 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 2.19 TFMP-3 6/26/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 2.69 9/27/2018 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <0.100 1.52 TFMP-4 6/26/2018 58.4 462 16.1 178.5 <2.0 20.8 0.97 0.49 9/27/2018 67.0 92.4 13.1 112.2 3.2 22.7 0.561 0.53 Type I and II Aquifers 5 1,000 700 10,000 0.65 20 0.047 0.047 BTEX, MTBE, and naphthalene results in parts per billion or ug/l TPH DRO/GRO results in parts per million or mg/l <5.0 = Analyte was not detected above the laboratory limit of quantitation (limit of quantitation shown) B = Benzene; T = Toluene; E = Ethylbenzene; X = Xylene MTBE = Methyl tert butyl ether TPH DRO = total petroleum hydrocarbons diesel range organics TPH GRO = total petroleum hydrocarbons gasoline range organics Bold indicates concentrations above MDE Standards Table 2 - Groundwater Analytical Results Piper's Wine & Spirit Barn 4127 Hanover Pike, Manchester, Maryland Some compounds may have been detected but are not tabulated on this spreadsheet. See laboratory analytical results reports for full results. MDE Standards (Generic Numeric Cleanup Standards for Groundwater and Soil - Interim Final Guidance Update No. 2.1 - June 2008)

Attachment C

Page 1 of 7 Page 2 of 7

Page 3 of 7 Page 4 of 7

Page 5 of 7 Page 6 of 7

Page 7 of 7 Page 1 of 25

Page 2 of 25 Page 3 of 25

Page 4 of 25 Page 5 of 25

Page 6 of 25 Page 7 of 25

Page 8 of 25 Page 9 of 25

Page 10 of 25 Page 11 of 25

Page 12 of 25 Page 13 of 25

Page 14 of 25 Page 15 of 25

Page 16 of 25 Page 17 of 25

Page 18 of 25 Page 19 of 25

Page 20 of 25 Page 21 of 25

Page 22 of 25 Page 23 of 25

Page 24 of 25 Page 25 of 25

Attachment D