Charles A. Doswell III, Harold E. Brooks, and Robert A. Maddox

Similar documents
1 of 7 Thunderstorm Notes by Paul Sirvatka College of DuPage Meteorology. Thunderstorms

Chapter 14 Thunderstorm Fundamentals

Chapter 8 cont. Clouds and Storms. Spring 2018

Chapter 8 cont. Clouds and Storms

Anthony A. Rockwood Robert A. Maddox

Urban Flash Flooding in Downtown Madison, WI and Southern Wisconsin, 27 July 2006

ATS 351, Spring 2010 Lab #9 Weather Radar - 55 points

Practical Use of the Skew-T, log-p diagram for weather forecasting. Primer on organized convection

OVERLAPPING SCALES and the ATMOSPHERIC CAUSES OF FLOODS. Katherine K. Hirschboeck Laboratory of Tree-ring Research University of Arizona

Part. I Introduction. Part II Scale Characteristics and Climatology of MCSs

Type of storm viewed by Spotter A Ordinary, multi-cell thunderstorm. Type of storm viewed by Spotter B Supecell thunderstorm

Tornadogenesis in Supercells: The Three Main Ingredients. Ted Funk

Weather report 28 November 2017 Campinas/SP

Weather Systems III: Thunderstorms and Twisters

Some heavy precipitation issues. AOS C115/C228 Fall 2014

TOPICS: What are Thunderstorms? Ingredients Stages Types Lightning Downburst and Microburst

ATS 351, Spring 2010 Lab #9 Weather Radar - 55 points

THE MESOSCALE CONVECTIVE SYSTEM FROM

Warm season forecasting! Some material adapted from Material Produced at COMET for their Residence Course in Hydrometeorology

Foundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa

Instabilities and Basic Convection

and 24 mm, hPa lapse rates between 3 and 4 K km 1, lifted index values

Multiscale Analyses of Inland Tropical Cyclone Midlatitude Jet Interactions: Camille (1969) and Danny (1997)

THUNDERSTORMS Brett Ewing October, 2003

contact with ground for 1 hour plus, starting 1500 MDT moved N., covered about 37 km width varied m

The Earth System - Atmosphere III Convection

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES NAME SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Fall ERTH FINAL EXAMINATION KEY 200 pts

11A.2 Forecasting Short Term Convective Mode And Evolution For Severe Storms Initiated Along Synoptic Boundaries

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part VI. Supercell Storms. Supercell Photos

Vol. VIII, Nr. 6 / 2009

24: Monthly Report September Seeding Operations & Atmospheric Research (SOAR) Snapshot of Seeding Operations

Advanced Spotter Training Lesson 4: The Nature of Thunderstorms

MET 3502 Synoptic Meteorology. Lecture 8: September 16, AIRMASSES, FRONTS and FRONTAL ANALYSIS (2)

P4.9 THE SEVERE THUNDERSTORM OUTBREAK IN FINLAND ON 5 JULY 2002

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics 3.4. Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and Mesoscale Convective Complexes

Shear-Parallel Mesoscale Convective Systems in a Moist Low- Inhibition Mei-Yu Front Environment. Liu and Moncrieff (2017 JAS)

Summary of High Wind Event of 7 March 2004

Convective Structures in a Simulated Torrential-Rain-Producing Mesoscale Convective System in East China. Jordan Foley

Mesoscale Convective Complexes (or Systems)

Solutions to Comprehensive Final Examination Given on Thursday, 13 December 2001

Case Study: Severe Thunderstorm Over Fairbanks, AK on 8 th of June, 1997

Summary of November Central U.S. Winter Storm By Christopher Hedge

April 13, 2006: Analysis of the Severe Thunderstorms that produced Hail in Southern Wisconsin

9D.3 THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL WIND SHEAR ON DEEP CONVECTION IN THE TROPICS

Meteorology Lecture 19

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 19 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Earth Science, 11e. Weather Patterns and Severe Storms Chapter 19. Air masses. A cold Canadian air mass Figure Air masses. Air masses 9/5/2012

HAZARDOUS WEATHER 1. Dr. Julie Laity Geography 266

Reading. What meteorological conditions precede a thunderstorm? Thunderstorms: ordinary or single cell storms, multicell storms, supercell storms

Monteverdi Metr 201 Quiz #4 100 pts.

MET Lecture 34 Downbursts

A more detailed and quantitative consideration of organized convection: Part I Cold pool dynamics and the formation of squall lines

ANSWER KEY. Part I: Synoptic Scale Composite Map. Lab 12 Answer Key. Explorations in Meteorology 54

A LOOK AT TROPICAL STORM GASTON FLOODING IN VIRGINIA

Air Masses, Fronts, Storm Systems, and the Jet Stream

Department of Geosciences San Francisco State University Spring Metr 201 Monteverdi Quiz #5 Key 150 pts.

Inner core dynamics: Eyewall Replacement and hot towers

Thunderstorm: a cumulonimbus cloud or collection of cumulonimbus clouds featuring vigorous updrafts, precipitation and lightning

Wet weeks in the warm season: Patterns and processes supporting widespread multi-day precipitation episodes!

Investigation of the Arizona Severe Weather Event of August 8 th, 1997

Steve Keighton * and Steve Nogueira NOAA/NWS Blacksburg, VA. Nicole Belk NOAA/NWS Charleston, WV

Precipitation AOSC 200 Tim Canty. Cloud Development: Orographic Lifting

Advanced Spotter Training: Anticipating Severe Weather Threats. Professor Paul Sirvatka College of DuPage Meteorology

Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus

THESIS CLIMATOLOGICAL AND RADAR-INDICATED CHARACTERISTICS OF UNITED STATES EXTREME RAIN EVENTS

Test Form: A Key Final Exam: Spring 2011

Impact of different cumulus parameterizations on the numerical simulation of rain over southern China

Kenneth L. Pryor* and Gary P. Ellrod Center for Satellite Applications and Research (NOAA/NESDIS) Camp Springs, MD

Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part V ñ Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and MCCs. Bright band associated with stratiform precipitation in a squall line system

Mid-Latitude Cyclones and Fronts. Lecture 12 AOS 101

Thunderstorm: a cumulonimbus cloud or collection of cumulonimbus clouds featuring vigorous updrafts, precipitation and lightning

QUASI-STATIONARY CONVECTIVE SYSTEMS FORMING PERPENDICULAR TO, AND ABOVE THE COLD POOLS OF, STRONG BOW ECHOES. A Thesis KELLY M.

Meteorology Lecture 18

High Impact Weather Event Week

SEVERE AND UNUSUAL WEATHER

CLOUDS & THUNDERSTORMS

Southern California Storm of July 2015

Mesoscale Convective Systems. The COMET Program March 2002

WARM SECTOR TORNADOES WITHOUT DISCERNIBLE SURFACE BOUNDARIES AND WITH MINIMAL DEEP LAYER SHEA

Answers to Clicker Questions

Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus

MEA 716 Exercise, BMJ CP Scheme With acknowledgements to B. Rozumalski, M. Baldwin, and J. Kain Optional Review Assignment, distributed Th 2/18/2016

Convective Dynamics. Jeremy A. Gibbs. March 10, University of Oklahoma

Evolution and Maintenance of the June 2003 Nocturnal Convection

Air Mass Thunderstorms. Air Mass Thunderstorms. Air Mass Thunderstorms. Lecture 26 Air Mass Thunderstorms and Lightning

1 August 2006 An Investigation of a Bow Echo along the Wasatch Front. Randy Graham and Chris Gibson 6 April 2007

Impacts of the April 2013 Mean trough over central North America

Severe Weather Event of 13 July 2014

Thunderstorms and Severe Weather. (Chapt 15)

The Environment of Warm-Season Elevated Thunderstorms Associated with Heavy Rainfall Over the Central United States

Convective Heavy rainfall event of 23 July 2013

4/18/2010. National Weather Service. Severe Weather Forecasting: A Western North Carolina Case Study

Name SOLUTIONS T.A./Section Atmospheric Science 101 Homework #6 Due Thursday, May 30 th (in class)

Jon M. Schrage 1 and A.H. Fink 2 3. CASES

Thunderstorm Downburst Prediction: An Integrated Remote Sensing Approach. Ken Pryor Center for Satellite Applications and Research (NOAA/NESDIS)

Indiana County Flash Flood of 22 June 2017

Isentropic Analysis. Much of this presentation is due to Jim Moore, SLU

10/21/2012. Chapter 10 Thunderstorms. Part II. Growth and Development of ordinary Cell Thunderstorms Thunderstorm Electrification.

Haiti and Dominican Republic Flash Flood Initial Planning Meeting

Flooding and Severe weather of 27 June 2013

Transcription:

Charles A. Doswell III, Harold E. Brooks, and Robert A. Maddox

Flash floods account for the greatest number of fatalities among convective storm-related events but it still remains difficult to forecast and warn for flash floods. The primary challenge in predicting flash flooding is that it goes beyond just predicting the occurrence of rain but the amount of rain. Hydrology also affects the prediction of flash flooding. An ingredients-based approach to forecasting creates a universally relevant framework that doesn t rely on statistical relationships but instead on physical processes.

The heaviest precipitation occurs where the rainfall rate is the highest for the longest period of time. (C. F. Chappell) This statement can be converted to the equation P RD where P is the total precipitation, R is the average rainfall rate and D is the duration. The authors of this paper decline to give exact numbers for what would be considered a high rainfall rate or a long duration as it would vary depending on the hydrometeorological situation.

In a general sense, the instantaneous rainfall rate is proportional to the magnitude of the vertical moisture flux. The moisture flux is the inflow of moist air, represented by wq where w is the ascent rate and q is the mixing ratio of the rising air. Not all water vapor that enters a cloud falls out as precipitation this relationship is quantified as the Precipitation Efficiency (E). E = m p /m i where m p is the mass of water falling as precipitation and m i is this influx of water vapor mass into the cloud. The instantaneous rainfall rate can now be expressed as R = Ewq. The calculation of the instantaneous rainfall rate itself is not important since all the amounts are averaged over the lifetime of the storm and therefore the exact calculation would be after the fact Look for where there is potential for a high rainfall rate, which would be where at least one of the factors (E, w, or q) is large and the rest at least moderate. The potential for a high rainfall rate increases as E, w, and q increase.

While flash flooding can occur in non-convective storms, flash flooding associated with convective storms is far more common. Deep moist convection is primarily a warm season event which allows for higher moisture content in the air and buoyant instability promotes strong upward motion. This combination can lead to high rain rates. Precipitation efficiency is not as important, unless unusually low, due to the higher values for ascent rate and mixing ratio. Ingredients for buoyancy and deep moist convection: The environmental lapse rate is conditionally unstable There is sufficient moisture that the rising parcel s associated moist adiabat has a level of free convection There is some process to lift the parcel to its LFC.

High rainfall rates alone cannot produce flash floods; it must be accompanied by a long duration over which rain is falling on the same area. This is most commonly achieved by quasi-stationary convective systems. Along with system size and system movement speed, the system motion vector (C s ) can greatly change the amount of precipitation a point on the ground receives. Instead of system size consider the length of the system along the system motion vector from where the point intercepts the storm to where it will pass out the other side (L s ). The Duration can now be expressed as D = L s ( C s ) -1.

Consider the following examples: a) Motion normal to storm line b) Motion more parallel to storm line c) Similar to b but with an area of trailing stratiform precipitation d) Train effect

Since C c, convective cell movement, is related to V m, the mean wind through some deep tropospheric layer, slow system movement could result from weak winds. A slow moving storm can still occur despite strong winds if cell movement is cancelled by the propagation effect resulting in slow system movement.

Multicell convection: Most convection is multicellular, even storms that may appear to have a single cell in radar images. Since most storms fall in the multicell category the importance isn t so much the number of cells but the degree of organization Supercell convection: Supercells tend to have strong updrafts as well as significant low level moisture which have potential for heavy rainfall rates but there are two factors of typical supercells that can reduce this potential. First is the loaded gun sounding often associated with supercells. The loaded gun sounding has a dry lower troposphere which can result in evaporation, reducing the Precipitation efficiency. Second, supercells tend to have high wind speeds aloft which cause fast system movement.

Squall lines (radar): A linear structure is probably the most common structure for flash flood producing storms. The train effect of storms developing and following one after another over the same spot is a characteristic of a linear structure and often a feature of flash flood events Mesoscale convective systems: MCSs tend to have a more or less linear structure as seen on a radar image. They also tend to have a trailing area of stratiform precipitation that extends the duration of rainfall. There is also a special type of evolution contributed to by MCSs where, over a period of days MCSs continually form and pass over the same area. This evolution can lead to the combination of flash floods and river floods.

Squall lines (satellite): What can appear as a squall line on a satellite is not an indication of a linear structure on a radar. These satellite viewed linear structures tend to be synoptic scale fronts and are not known to commonly produce flash floods. Non-convective precipitation systems: Flash floods produced by non-convective systems while not as common, do occur. Usually the upward motion for this type of storm is forced rather than freely buoyant. Forced uplift usually results in a lower, warmer system which can affect how it is viewed in a satellite or radar image. This can make it difficult to forecast rainfall amounts.

There are some synoptic scale processes that affect the possibility for flash flooding. Short wave troughs are known to often coincide with deep moist convection. There is also a connection with flash flooding near a 500mb ridge axis. This connection may be due to the suppressing effect of the anticyclone on deep moist convection. This suppression allows moisture to return at low levels and accumulate. Convection on the margins of the suppressed area can now draw on this accumulated moisture.

Mesoscale processes contribute the lift to initiate convection. Mesoscale convective system propagation can prolong the duration of rainfall. MCS s tend to have a deep convective part as well as a stratiform precipitation part which causes a prolonged duration. MCS s also produce outflow boundaries which can initiate new convection.

Storm outflow can change the evolution of the system. If the downdraft evaporates a lot of condensate, the air will cool which will result in negative buoyancy. High evaporation is associated with a low precipitation efficiency. This suggests that a warmer outflow would have a higher precipitation efficiency. A warmer outflow would also move more slowly away from its source which would cause new cells to form closer to their predecessor.

Even though the low level flow is weak; the advection of warm, moist air from the gulf slowly moves north and north-eastward into Iowa. 500 hpa, 0000 UTC: a) 7 September 1989 b) 8 September 1989 Heights (solid lines, interval 60 dam), temperature (dashed lines, interval 5 C), short-wave trough axes (thick-dashed lines)

It is easier to see the movement of moist air in this image. It is an isentropic analysis on the 306K surface. Pressure (solid lines, 40 hpa interval) mixing ratio (dashed lines, 2 g kg-1 interval) a) 7 September 1989 0000 UTC b) 8 September 1989 0000 UTC

The thermodynamic profiles for a) 7 September and b) 8 September at 0000 UTC You can see the inversion on the Sep 7 sounding becomes much higher and weaker on the Sep 8 sounding. There is also a thicker layer of increased low level moisture on the Sep 8 sounding. Notice the wind profile remains weak.

High lapse rates over southern Nevada coupled with substantial low level moisture indicates that a large CAPE is possible which indicates substantial vertical motion. Vertical motion and low level moisture lead to the possibility of high rainfall rates. 700 500-hPa temperature difference (solid lines, interval 2 C) and the 850-hPa mixing ratio (dashed lines, interval 2 g kg-1). 1200 UTC 10 August 1981.

The hodograph shows the general flow of southeasterly wind. The storm cells moved relatively slowly since the wind speed remained below 15 m s-1 for the most part. The pressure levels displayed along the hodograph are in hpa This flash flood event killed 500 cattle at the Hidden Valley Ranch and caused approximately $3 million in damages.

The lifting mechanism for this flash flood event was a mountain range along the Kenai peninsula with peaks of about 1500m. A strong synoptic system approaching from the west was forced up the slope. The slow moving system caused the upslope flow to persist for 48hrs. Moderate rainfall rates were sustained for 2 days.

In order to have flash flooding it is necessary for heavy precipitation to fall in an area with the proper hydrological setup (which has not been dealt with in this paper). Heavy precipitation requires sustained high rainfall rates which result from slow moving, rain producing systems. There are different ways in which these ingredients can come together but by returning our attention to the basic underlying physical processes it is possible to see the combination of ingredients that may not be superficially visible. Ingredients based forecasting is not limited to flash flooding and the authors of this paper suggest strongly that such an approach should be used for all forecasting events.