San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study

Similar documents
Spring Run Spawning Habitat Assessment Sediment Mobility

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Reach 1A Spawning Area Bed Mobility

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

SRH Group Facies Mapping

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Appendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report

Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Modeling Strategy

An Adaptive Assessment of the Flushing Flow Needs of the Lower Poudre River, Colorado: First Evaluation

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Technical Memorandum No

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY C A L I F O R N I A S T A T E L A N D S C O M M I S S I O N

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Physical modeling to guide river restoration projects: An Overview

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JANUARY 2005 STORM, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

Bishopville Prong Study

Geomorphology Studies

A Model to Predict the Evolution of a Gravel Bed River Under an Imposed Cyclic Hydrograph and its Application to the Trinity River

Squaw Creek. General Information

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Ecosystem response during the removal of the Elwha River Dams

Influence of Paleochannels on Seepage

Technical Review of Pak Beng Hydropower Project (1) Hydrology & Hydraulics and (2) Sediment Transport & River Morphology

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Sediment Transport V: Estimating Bed-Material Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers. UC Berkeley January 2004 Peter Wilcock

Estimating Stream Gradient Using NHD Stream Lines and DEM Data

Design and Construction

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Deriving Vegetation Characteristics from LIDAR Data and Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling of the San Joaquin River Floodplain

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

THE MIDDLE SACRAMENTO RIVER: HUMAN IMPACTS ON PHYSICAL AND ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES ALONG A MEANDERING RIVER 1

Appendix D. Sediment Texture and Other Soil Data

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Technical Appendix. Pallid Sturgeon

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Appendix 12J Winter-Run Chinook Salmon Life Cycle Modeling

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Measurements of Bed Load Transport on Pacific Creek, Buffalo Fork and The Snake River in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming.

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District. Boardman River SIAM Modeling Base-case Scenario

Lower Susquehanna River Integrated Sediment & Nutrient Monitoring Program

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

5/4/2017 Fountain Creek. Gage Analysis. Homework 6. Clifton, Cundiff, Pour, Queen, and Zey CIVE 717

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Updated 2018 Restoration Allocation & Default Flow Schedule February 16, 2018

Water Temperature Monitoring of the Klamath River Mainstem

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

Chehalis Basin Strategy

UPPER TUOLUMNE RIVER ECOSYSTEM PROJECT Preliminary Sediment Source and Sediment Transport Capacity Evaluation: O Shaughnessy Dam to Poopenaut Valley

Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions along the Hangman, California, and Rock Creeks, September 30, 2009

MEMORANDUM. Situation. David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA Ph Fx

SHASTA RIVER GEOMORPHOLOGY: INCIPIENT MOTION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT AND BAR-RESPONSE RESULTS FROM THE 1996 AND 2004 CONTROLLED-FLOOD EXPERIMENTS ON THE COLORADO RIVER IN GRAND CANYON

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Woodstock, Route 26 Stream Relocation Project

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

Options looking forward for sediment management in the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

Final Report for the Green Valley Creek Winter Refugia Enhancement Project Monitoring December 2016

2013 Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning Summary 2,667 2, ,391

Computational Modeling of River Flow, Sediment Transport, and Bed Evolution Using Remotely Sensed Data

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Fine sediment in pools: an index of how sediment is affecting a stream channel

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

SELBY CREEK STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION AND RIPARIAN REVEGETATION PROJECT: GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Geomorphology Study Study Plan Section Study Implementation Report.

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE 50- AND 100-YEAR STORMS, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Mercury and methylmercury transport in the Cache Creek Settling Basin, California, U.S.A.

Executive Summary. Water Quantity

Technical Memorandum

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

2. PRESENT CONDITION OF THE RESERVOIR 2.1 View of Wonogiri Reservoir (1/3)

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Wildfire impacts on stream sedimentation: re-visiting the Boulder Creek Burn in Little Granite Creek, Wyoming, USA

Transcription:

Study 22 San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study Public Draft 2013 Monitoring and Analysis Plan September 2012

22.0 San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study 22.1 Statement of Need The purpose of this study is to quantify the sediment input from two major tributaries, Cottonwood Creek and Little Dry Creek, to the San Joaquin River downstream from Friant Dam. The amount and type of sediment contributed from the two major tributaries is not well understood but likely will play a substantial role in the sediment budget of the San Joaquin River, given the lack of upstream sediment supply due to Friant Dam. The amount and timing of fine and coarse sediment contributed by these tributaries can be critically important for aquatic and riparian species, which are a focus of the SJRRP. 22.2 Background One of the main concerns with respect to tributary sediments on the San Joaquin River downstream from Friant Dam is the potential adverse effect on salmonids. The effects of fine sediment supply on salmonids depend primarily on the size of the sediment and the timing of its addition to the channel (Chapman, 1988; Kondolf, 2000). While coarse sediment between the range of 10 mm to 55 mm is needed for spawning by adults (Chapman, 1988; Kondolf and Wolman, 1993) and for cover by juveniles (review in Kondolf 2000), fine sediment and sand can have a detrimental effect, both on emergence and juvenile rearing quality (Chapman, 1988; Kondolf, 2000; Suttle et al., 2004). In particular, the timing of sediment supply is important, since the eggs must incubate for several months before emergence (Chapman, 1988), which makes them susceptible during this time. If it is supplied after egg deposition, fine sediment and sand can filter down through the framework gravels to plug pore spaces, decreasing permeability and inhibiting the flow of adequate water to eggs or alevins located in the redd (Kondolf, 2000). Relatively small amounts of fines, 10 percent to 30 percent, can significantly decrease incubation and emergence rates (Chapman, 1988). The size of fine sediment that significantly decreases survival of incubating eggs varies, but is generally considered to be less than 1 mm (Kondolf, 2000), though sizes up to 9.5 mm have also been found to decrease survival rates (Chapman, 1988). Herein, fine sediment is defined as that finer than 0.063 mm, sand sizes range from 0.063 to 2 mm, and coarse sediment is defined as larger than 2 mm. At a larger reach-scale, tributary sediment inputs below dams can create sediment continuity issues in the main stem stream, particularly associated with the creation of delta deposits at the tributary mouth (because flood flows that could transport tributary

sediments have been reduced or eliminated). For example, on the Trinity River below the Trinity and Lewiston dams in Northern California, the Rush Creek tributary created a delta that resulted in a pool several kilometers long and was a significant barrier to main stem bedload continuity (Wilcock et al., 1996). In addition, tributary inputs can influence bar dynamics and downstream bedload transport by supplying fine and coarse sediment inputs and altering downstream bed grain size distributions. The proposed study will focus on quantifying the sediment inputs from Little Dry Creek and Cottonwood Creek because these two tributaries have large watersheds, approximately 188 square kilometers and 130 square kilometers, respectively. As such, these tributaries have potentially large sediment loads that could significantly influence sediment dynamics on the main stem San Joaquin River below Friant Dam. The primary research objective of this study is to quantify the rate, timing, and grain size distribution of sediment entering the main stem San Joaquin from these two tributaries. As part of this primary objective, we will also examine potential sediment continuity issues in the tributaries (e.g., capture by gravel pits) as well as the main stem (e.g., deltas at tributary mouths). 22.3 Methods To quantify the topography of the tributaries immediately upstream from their confluence with the San Joaquin River as well as their deltas, a combination of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and topographic surveys (including monumented cross sections) will be performed. At a minimum, the tributary stream topography within 200 meters of the confluence, and at least 100 meters upstream and downstream along the main stem San Joaquin River will be surveyed with Terrestrial Laser Scanning. The Terrestrial Laser Scanning and cross-section datasets will be used to estimate delta volumes, as inputs into bedload and total load calculations, and as a baseline dataset for future studies and monitoring by SJRRP. Historical aerial photography at the tributary confluences (already collected and rectified by Reclamation) will be used to evaluate historical changes in the tributaries and their deltas near the confluences. To evaluate the tributaries upstream from their confluences with the San Joaquin River, a geomorphic analysis will be conducted using field surveys, 2007 mapping of Reach 1A performed by DWR via photogrammetry, 2008 DWR bathymetric surveys, geomorphic mapping, and measurements of grain size distributions. Of particular interest for this study is the sediment transport continuity through the lower reaches of Little Dry Creek, which flows through several abandoned gravel mining pits. A recent reconnaissance trip to the lower reaches of Little Dry Creek during a moderate flow event (approximately 100 cfs) indicated that at least two of the abandoned gravel pits were nearly full of sediment, such that sediment was passing freely through this reach. Sediment supply to the lower reaches of Little Dry Creek, downstream from the discharge weir at the North Friant Road Bridge, will be estimated using calculations of bedload and total load, as well as the sediment basin dredging records from the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (Paul Allen, 2011).

Sand and coarse sediment transport will be sampled with several Bunte-type samplers (Bunte et al., 2007). The Bunte samplers have a significant advantage over traditional bedload samplers, in that the Bunte traps can be deployed for lengthy periods of time (up to several days) and do not require active human presence. This feature is particularly attractive given the flashy nature of the tributaries and the difficulty in getting to the field sites in time for discharge events. Potential sites for the Bunte samplers include the tributaries immediately upstream from their confluences with the San Joaquin, as well as the discharge weir on Little Dry Creek at the North Friant Road Bridge. 22.4 Schedule The proposed study period covers 3 years, WY 2011 through 2013. A multiple-year study is necessary due to the flashy nature of these tributaries and hydrologic variability between water years. Terrestrial Laser Scanning and cross-section surveys will be conducted annually during low main stem flows following winter high flows. Sediment samplers will be deployed during the winter wet season in all 3 years (if samplers can be procured in time for WY 2011 events). Data analysis and transport calculations will occur in the summer and fall of each year following the winter/spring fieldwork. A final report will be prepared documenting the study results following the third year of fieldwork (due September 30, 2013). Information and presentations will be provided to SJRRP staff on an ongoing basis that will be timed to provide adequate information for flow release planning for each water year. 22.5 Budget Table 22-1 lists the estimated costs for this study. Table 22-1. Study Estimated Costs FY11 FY12 FY13 Labor/benefits Hydrologic Technician GS-6 2,421 2,421 2,421 Research Hydrologist GS-12 34,840 29,863 41,620 Research Hydrologist GS-13 5,434 5,434 5,434 Travel/shipping 3,000 3,000 3,000 Sediment lab analyses 1,260 1,260 1,260 Equipment and supplies (sediment samplers, Laser Scanner rental) 8,100 3,400 3,400 Subtotal 55,055 45,378 57,135 Indirect costs 51,191 42,193 49,645 TOTAL $106,246 $87,571 $106,780 Key: FY = fiscal year

22.6 Points of Contact/Agency The points of contact for this study are Drs. Scott Wright and J. Toby Minear at the USGS. Dr. Scott Wright email: sawright@usgs.gov phone: 916-278-3024 address: Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Sacramento, California 95819 Dr. J. Toby Minear email: jminear@usgs.gov phone: 916-278-3000 address: Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Sacramento, California 95819 22.7 Deliverables A USGS report and/or journal article will be prepared as the final product. Interim information will be provided in the form of presentations to the SJRRP staff. In addition, the collected field data and calculations completed in this study will be made available to the SJRRP. 22.8 References Allen, Paul. 2011. Personal Communication. Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD). January 21, 2011. Bunte, Kristin, Kurt W. Swingle. Steven R. Abt. 2007. Guidelines for using bedload traps in coarse-bedded mountain streams: Construction, installation, operation, and sample processing. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-191. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 91 p. Chapman, D.W. 1988. Critical review of variables used to define effects of fines in redds of large salmonids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 117(1), 1-21. Kondolf, G.M. 2000. Assessing salmonid spawning gravel quality. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129, 262-281. Kondolf, G.M., and M.G. Wolman. 1993. The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels. Water Resources Research, 29(7), 2275-2285.

Suttle, K.B., M.E.EPower, J.M. Levine, and C. McNeely. 2004. How fine sediment in riverbeds impairs growth and survival of juvenile salmonids. Ecological Applications, 14(4), 969-974. Wilcock, P.R., G.M. Kondolf, W.V.G. Matthews, and A.F. Barta. 1996. Specification of sediment maintenance flows for a large gravel-bed river. Water Resources Research 32(9), 2911 2921.

This page left blank intentionally.