Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

Similar documents
Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Hyper-Kamiokande R&D. Francesca Di Lodovico (QMUL) on behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande working groups

Search for sterile neutrino mixing in the muon neutrino to tau neutrino appearance channel with the OPERA detector

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Hyper-K physics potentials and R&D

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Super/Hyper-Kamiokande

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment. Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary University of London

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)068. The PINGU detector

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

What should be considered and improved for CP study.

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Sterile Neutrino Experiments at Accelerator

New results from RENO and prospects with RENO-50

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

This is a repository copy of Astroparticle Physics in Hyper-Kamiokande.

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

K2K and T2K experiments

KamLAND. Studying Neutrinos from Reactor

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Aug 2006

M.Nakahata. Kamioka observatory ICRR/IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo. 2016/11/8 M. Nakahata: Neutrino experiments - 30 years at Kamioka 1

reνolution Three Neutrino Oscillation Lecture Two Lindley Winslow Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

XMASS 1.5, the next step of the XMASS experiment

Resolving Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and CP Degeneracy Using Two Identical Detectors with Different Baselines

SHiP: a new facility with a dedicated detector for neutrino physics

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Leptons and the Weak Interaction

Giant Liquid Argon Observatory for Proton Decay, Neutrino Astrophysics and CP-violation in the Lepton Sector (GLACIER)

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Next-Generation Water Cherenkov Detectors (1) Hyper-Kamiokande

Chart of Elementary Particles

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Existing and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

PoS(NEUTEL2017)007. Results from RENO. Soo-Bong Kim. for the RENO collaboration Seoul National University, Republic of Korea

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

New Results from RENO

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

Outline. (1) Physics motivations. (2) Project status

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)309. Electroweak Physics at LHCb

T2K neutrino oscillation results

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Transcription:

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande on behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration Queen Mary University of London E-mail: l.cremonesi@qmul.ac.uk Hyper-Kamiokande (Hyper-K) is a megaton scale water Cherenkov detector proposed to be built in Japan. Hyper-K is the logical continuation of the highly successful program of neutrino physics and proton decay searches using a water Cherenkov technique. Hyper-K will study the CP asymmetry in neutrino oscillations using the neutrino and anti-neutrino beams produced at J-PARC. With an exposure of 7.5 MW 1 7 seconds, δ CP can be measured to better than 19 at all values, and CP violation can be detected with more than 3 sigma (5 sigma) significance for 76% (58%) of values of δ CP. PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 The European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics 9 July 15 Vienna, Austria Speaker. currently at University College London c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4. International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.). http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Hyper-Kamiokande Hyper-Kamiokande (Hyper-K) is a proposed next generation underground water Cherenkov detector [1, ] that has a variety of physics goals; these include the study of neutrino oscillation (atmospheric, solar or from accelerator), neutrino astrophysics, proton decay and non-standard physics. The baseline design consists of separate tanks lying along side (as shown in Figure 1), each having an egg-shape cross section and dimensions 48 m 54 m 5 m. The total (fiducial) mass is.99 (.56) million metric tons, about (5) times larger than that of the current running detector, Super-Kamiokande. The large mass will provide Hyper-K with a lot of statistics which is crucial in neutrino oscillation experiments. The two water tanks are divided into 1 optically separated compartments. The inner detector (ID) is covered by 99, Hamamatsu R36 -inch diameter photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), giving a photocatode coverage of %. The outer detector (OD) is equipped with 5, 8-inch diameter PMTs. These PMTs are the same used in the Super-K experiment and provide excellent particle identification (PID) in the sub-gev region (better than 99%). Figure 1: Schematic view of the Hyper-Kamiokande detector.. Tokai to Hyper-Kamiokande PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 The candidate site for Hyper-K is the Tochibora mine (Kamioka town, Gifu, Japan), at 95 km from J-PARC, the ideal position for a future long-baseline neutrino experiment. This site has 648 m overburden rock (1,75 m water equivalent) and a cosmic ray muon flux of 8 1 7 sec 1 cm. Following the experience of the TK experiment, the J-PARC facilities will deliver a narrow band (.6 GeV) muon (anti-)neutrino beam directed.5 off-axis to Hyper-K. The expected beam power is about 1 MW or more. Figure shows the oscillation probability as a function of energy (ν-mode on left and ν-mode on right) for a baseline of 95 km, evaluated with θ 3 maximal and normal mass hierarchy. At nominal δ CP =, the difference between neutrino and anti-neutrino appearance probability is as large as 5%.

P(νµ νe).1.8.6.4 neutrino L=95km, sin θ 13=.1 δ = δ = 1/π δ = π δ = -1/π P(νµ νe).1.8.6.4 anti-neutrino L=95km, sin θ 13=.1 δ = δ = 1/π δ = π δ = -1/π.. 1 Eν (GeV) 1 E ν (GeV) Figure : Oscillation probability as a function of the energy for ν µ ν e (left) and ν µ ν e (right). Different values of δ CP (, 1/π, π, -1/π) are overlaid. Table 1: Expected number of events after the ν e (ν e ) appearance selection during ν (ν) running mode. Signal Background ν µ ν e ν µ ν e ν µ CC ν µ CC ν e CC ν e CC NC Total ν mode 316 8 11 53 17 375 ν mode 396 11 4 5 396 65 3397.1 Near detectors The near detector complex at 8 m will include upgrades of the current existing detectors, INGRID (on axis detector used to monitor the beam position and for beam mean energy measurements) and ND8 (off axis detector used for neutrino flux measurement and constraint of systematic uncertainties). The addition of new detectors, like a 3D grid-like neutrino near detector with a water target (WAGASCI), a high pressure TPC [3] or a water-based liquid scintillation detector [4] are also being investigated. The addition of a new water-based intermediate (1- km) detector is planned to better constrain uncertainties on flux and cross-section. Currently there are two proposals, the nuprism [5] (a water column detector to minimise dependence on ν interaction sampling the beam at several offaxis angles) and the TITUS [6] (a water Cherekov detector gadolinium doped, surrounded by a muon range detector), detectors. The upgraded near detectors and the addition of the intermediate water Cherenkov detector will reduce the systematic uncertainties on the neutrino flux and cross-sections. PoS(EPS-HEP15)54. Expected observables at Hyper-K Table 1 and Figure 3 show the expected number of events after the ν e /ν e appearance selection. In ν running mode the main background is composed of beam ν e CC and all NC interactions. In ν running mode, the wrong sign appearance is also non-negligible. Table shows the expected number of events after the ν µ /ν µ disappearance selection. In both running modes the main background comes from NC interactions..3 Assumptions on systematic uncertainties The experience of the TK experiment offers a realistic estimation of the systematic uncer- 3

Table : Expected number of events after the ν µ (ν µ ) disappearance selection during ν (ν) running mode. ν µ CC ν µ CC ν e CC ν e CC NC ν µ ν e total ν mode 175 188 11 1 999 49 1937 ν mode 166 15597 7 7 181 6 6964 Number of events/5 MeV 35 3 5 15 1 5 Appearance ν mode..4.6.8 1 1. rec Reconstructed Energy E ν Total Beam ν e + ν e ν µ + ν µ Beam: (GeV) Number of events/5 MeV 3 5 15 1 5 Appearance ν mode..4.6.8 1 1. rec Reconstructed Energy E ν Figure 3: Reconstructed neutrino energy distribution of the ν e candidate events. Total Beam ν e + ν e ν µ + ν µ Beam: (GeV) tainties. These are evaluated assuming the TK neutrino beam line and the current near detectors, but also taking into account possible improvements in the detectors and analyses. The largest uncertainties are coming from the flux and cross-section parameters constrained by the fit to the current near detector data, which are assumed to stay at the same level as those of the TK experiment. The cross-section uncertainties that are not constrained by the fit to the near detector data and the far detector uncertainties will be reduced by the presence of upgraded and new near detectors and by the availability of a larger atmospheric neutrino sample. Table 3 gives a summary of the assumptions on the systematic uncertainties for the appearance and disappearance analyses in neutrino and anti-neutrino running modes. Table 3: Uncertainties (in %) for the expected number of events at Hyper-K from the systematic uncertainties assumed in this study. PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 Source ν mode ν mode Appearance Disappearance Appearance Disappearance Flux & ND-constrained cross section 3..8 5.6 4. ND-independent cross section 1. 1.5. 1.4 Far detector.7 1. 1.7 1.1 Total 3.3 3.3 6. 4.5 4

3. Neutrino oscillation physics potentials Sensitivity studies have been performed taking into account an integrated beam power of 7.5 MW 1 7 sec (corresponding to 1.56 1 protons on target with 3 GeV J-PARC beam) and a 1:3 ratio of neutrino to anti-neutrino running. In the framework used, the appearance and disappearance spectra are fitted simultaneously and δ CP, θ 13, θ 3 and m 3 are considered free parameters. 3.1 Sensitivity to CP violation Figure 4 shows the expected significance to exclude sinδ CP = (CP conserved case) when the true mass hierarchy is normal and known. The significance is calculated as σ = χ, where χ is the difference of the trial value of δ CP and δ CP = or 18 (the smaller value of the difference is taken). Figure 5 (left) shows the fraction of δ CP for which sinδ CP = can be excluded at 3σ or 5σ: CP violation in the lepton sector can be observed with 3σ (5σ)for 76% (58%) of the δ CP parameter space. Figure 5 (right) shows the 1σ uncertainty for δ CP as a function of the integrated beam power: considering full Hyper-K statistics the δ CP phase could be determined to better than 19 degrees for all possible values of δ CP. σ= χ 1 8 6 4 5σ 3σ Normal mass hierarchy -15-1 -5 5 1 15 δ CP Figure 4: Expected significance to exclude sinδ CP =. PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 3. Sensitivity to θ 3 and m 3 Hyper-K will be able to look at the appearance and disappearance spectra simultaneously and hence also measure sin θ 3 and m 3. The 9% CL allowed regions in the sin θ 3 m 3 plane are shown in Figure 6 for two different values of sin θ 3 (left.5, right.45). If θ 3 is non-maximal, with a constraint on sin θ 13 from the reactor experiments Hyper-K will be able to resolve the octant degeneracy and precisely measure θ 3. 3.3 Sensitivity to mass hierarchy The CP sensitivity results shown in Subsection 3.1 assume that the mass hierarchy is known. In case the mass hierarchy is not discovered before Hyper-K starts taking data, the atmospheric 5

(%) δ Fraction of 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 5 σ 3 σ 4 6 8 1 7 Integrated beam power (MW 1 sec) (degree) δ 1σ error of 5 45 4 35 3 5 15 1 5 δ = δ = 9 4 6 8 1 7 Integrated beam power (MW 1 sec) Figure 5: Fraction of δ CP for which sinδ CP = can be excluded at 3σ (left). 1σ uncertainty for δ CP as a function of the integrated beam power (right). Δ m [ev ] 3.6 1.55.5.45.4.35.3.5-3 Hyper-K Hyper-K + reactor..4.4.44.46.48.5.5.54.56.58.6.6 sin θ 3.6 1.55.5.45.4.35.3.5-3 Hyper-K + reactor..35.4.45.5.55.6.65 sin θ 3 Figure 6: The 9% CL allowed regions in the sin θ 3 m 3 plane. The true values are sin θ 3 =.5 (left), sin θ 3 =.45 (right) and m 3 =.4 1 3 ev. Effect of systematic uncertainties is included. The red (blue) line corresponds to the result with Hyper-K alone (with reactor constraints on sin θ 13 ). neutrino sample through the matter effect inside the Earth, can provide a good sensitivity to the mass hierarchy. Figure 7 shows the χ discrimination of the wrong hierarchy hypothesis as a function of the assumed true value of sin θ 3. The 9% CL region of sin θ 3 allowed by TK is also shown. The sensitivity to distinguish the wrong mass hierarchy is strongly dependent on the true value of θ 3. Nonetheless, assuming 1 years statistics, Hyper-K will be able to reject the wrong hierarchy at more than 3σ level for all values of θ 3 currently allowed. Δ m [ev ] 3 PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 4. Conclusion The neutrino oscillation physics potential of the Hyper-K detector has been studied based on the experience of the TK and Super-Kamiokande experiments. If the mass hierarchy is known by the time Hyper-K starts taking data, with an integrated beam power of 7.5 MW 1 7 sec, the value of δ CP can be determined to better than 19 for all values of 6

Wrong Hierarchy Rejection Δχ 3 5 15 1 5 TK 9% CL.4.45.5.55.6 sin θ 3 Uncertainty δ cp Figure 7: Atmospheric neutrino sensitivities for a ten year exposure of Hyper-K assuming the mass hierarchy is normal. The χ discrimination of the wrong hierarchy hypothesis as a function of the assumed true value of sin θ 3 []. δ CP. CP violation in the lepton sector can be observed with more than 3 σ (5 σ) significance for 76% (58%) of the possible values of δ CP. If the mass hierarchy is not known, Hyper-K using atmospheric neutrinos will be able to reject the wrong mass hierarchy with more than 3σ for all the allowed values of θ 3. Furthermore, using the constraint to θ 13 coming from the reactor experiments, Hyper-K will be able to distinguish the θ 3 octant and precisely measure both θ 3 and m 3. References [1] Abe K et al 11 Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment Detector Design and Physics Potential arxiv preprint hep-ex 119.36 [] Hyper-Kamiokande Working Group, Abe K et al 15 Physics Potential of a Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Using J-PARC Neutrino Beam and Hyper-Kamiokande Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (15) 53C. [3] M. Ravonel, F. Sanchez, High Pressure Gas TPC, at Near detector workshop 19th January 14, Tokai. [4] M. Yeh, S. Hans, W. Beriguete, R. Rosero, L. Hu, et al 11 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A66, 51-56. [5] Bhadra S et al Letter of Intent to Construct a nuprism Detector in the J-PARC Neutrino Beamline arxiv:141.386 [physics.ins-det] [6] Lasorak P Prouse N TITUS: An Intermediate Distance Detector for the Hyper-Kamiokande Neutrino Beam arxiv:154.87 [physics.ins-det] 3 σ σ PoS(EPS-HEP15)54 7