First results of Bosnia-Herzegovina Meteor Network (BHMN)

Similar documents
Television meteor observations in INASAN A.P. Kartashova

METEORS VIDEO OBSERVATION SYSTEM IN (NRIAG) EGYPT, GOALS AND EQUIPMENT

Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference

Population index reloaded

High resolution orbits of Perseids and Geminids with CHIPOlAtA

Meteor spectra in the EDMOND database

34 WGN, the Journal of the IMO 39:2 (2011) Video observation of Geminids 2010 and Quadrantids 2011 by SVMN and CEMeNt

Double-Station Meteor Observations in Ryazan, Russia

Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference

PART 6: DOUBLE-STATION CAMERA WORK

A permanent double-station meteor camera setup in the Netherlands

Current status of the Spanish Fireball Network: all-sky and video system monitoring and recent daylight events

Video Observation of Geminid 2010 from India using a portable system

De-biasing of the velocity determination for double station meteor observations from CILBO

Tuesday, August 25, 2015 IMC, August 2015, Mistelbach - Austria 1

Meteoroid flux determination using image intensified video camera data from the CILBO double station

MASS INDEX AND MASS OF THE GEMINID METEOROID STREAM AS FOUND WITH RADAR, OPTICAL, AND LUNAR IMPACT DATA

The Northern ω-scorpiid meteoroid stream: orbits and emission spectra

Confirmation of the Northern Delta Aquariids (NDA, IAU #26) and the Northern June Aquilids (NZC, IAU #164)

A new method of discovering new meteor showers from the IMO single-station video meteor database

Photographing Meteors, Fireballs and Meteor Showers

The Bolide. Authors: Petya Dimitrova and Nikol Stoeva Team leader: Yoanna Kokotanekova Astronomical observatory by Youth center Haskovo, Bulgaria 2016

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 5 Jun 2013

Meteors and meteorites spectra

Think about. Aug. 13, What is science?

Offbeat and wacky projects using a video meteor camera

AAG TPoint Mapper (Version 1.40)

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore meteor

Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference

Visual observations of Geminid meteor shower 2004

Confirmation of the April Rho Cygnids (ARC, IAU#348)

Meteor Shower Flux Densities and the Zenith Exponent

No sign of the 2014 Daytime Sextantids and mass indexes determination from radio observations

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 21 Apr 2017

Photographing the Moon and the ISS. By Thierry Legault

Paper Reference. Tuesday 14 June 2005 Morning Time: 2 hours

Observing Meteor Showers

Observers and conditions

7. Telescopes: Portals of Discovery Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Addison Wesley

Slovakian part of the European fireball network

Flux of impacts in Jupiter: From super bolides to larger scale collisions

The Inferior Planets. Culpeper Astronomy Club Meeting October 23, 2017

CONTENTS. vii. in this web service Cambridge University Press. Preface Acknowledgements. xiii xvi

WGN, the Journal of the IMO XX:X (200X) Video observation of Draconids 2011 from Italy. CEMeNt - Central European Meteor Network 3

Astronomy 3. Earth Movements Seasons The Moon Eclipses Tides Planets Asteroids, Meteors, Comets

NARRATOR: Welcome to Astronomy Behind the Headlines, a podcast by the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 12 Apr 2017

Solar System. Reading Passages Included. Created By: The Owl Teacher

Lecture 8. October 25, 2017 Lab 5

Meteoroid stream and meteor showers of comet C/1964 N1. Part II

UFO Analyser - Leeds

10 Years IMO Video Meteor Network Impact on working lists

PART 8: PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS

Uncorrelated Lunar Object: U092196

Small Bodies in our Solar System. Comets, Asteroids & Meteoroids

Hyperbolic and interstellar meteors in the IAU MDC radar data

GROUND BASED OBSERVATIONS OF LUNAR METEORS IN SUPPORT OF THE LADEE MISSION: A STATUS UPDATE

Modeling Meteors. Summer School of Science. Project report. Chloe Udressy Marcell Dorian Kovacs Nensi Komljenovic. Project leader: Dusan Pavlovic

Overview of Meteor Science Research at the University of Western Ontario

Future Robotic observatory on Mountain Vidojevica: site and equipment specification

These maps also show the path of the sun and moon movements in the sky.

MST radar observations of the Leonid meteor storm during

Visual Observation of Meteors in Nepal

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 24 May 2017

WHAT PHOTOMETRIC PRECISION CAN I ACHIEVE? DAVID BOYD

DOME C AS A SETTING FOR THE PERMANENT ALL SKY SURVEY (PASS)

An Earth-grazing fireball from the Daytime ζ -Perseid shower observed over Spain on 2012 June 10

Astronomy Merit Badge

An Adaptive Autoguider using a Starlight Xpress SX Camera S. B. Foulkes, Westward, Ashperton, Nr. Ledbury, HR8 2RY. Abstract

A Ramble Through the Night Sky

Observation of Light Curves of Space Objects. Hirohisa Kurosaki Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Toshifumi Yanagisawa.

NEW WIDE FIELD CAMERA FOR SEARCH FOR FAST OPTICAL TRANSIENTS. A. Pozanenko IKI RAS, Moscow, Russia

BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings

Proceedings of the International Meteor Conference

The Transneptunian Automated Occultation Survey (TAOS II) Matthew Lehner ASIAA

Comets, Asteroids & Meteors (The Universe)

Space Surveillance using Star Trackers. Part I: Simulations

SKYCAL - Sky Events Calendar

The activity of the 2004 Geminid meteor shower from global visual observations

Comets and KBO's. Comets. Halley's Comet. Far outside the orbit of Neptune are an overwhelming number of small icy bodies

Investigation of meteor shower parent bodies using various metrics

The United Kingdom fireball of 30th March 2013: Observation and analysis using NEMETODE and visual data

Meteor Showers Discovered

The planned JEM-EUSO mission and applications to meteor observation.

UNIT 1: EARTH AND THE SOLAR SYSTEM.

Fragmentation and Wake Formation in Faint Meteors: Implications for the Structure and Ablation of Small Meteoroids

Fragmentation model analysis of the observed atmospheric trajectory of the Tagish Lake fireball

observer s page How to observe Meteors Tim Cooper (Director, Comet and Meteor Section)

INTRODUCTION TO ASTRONOMY LAB

Meteors. Meteors Comet dust particles entering our atmosphere and burning up from the friction. The Peekskill, NY Meteorite Fall.

Modern Navigation. Thomas Herring

TELESCOPES. How do they work?

CST Prep- 8 th Grade Astronomy

ASTRONOMY CURRICULUM Unit 1: Introduction to Astronomy

Universe Celestial Object Galaxy Solar System

The Quadrantid meteor stream and 2003 EH1

The path towards measuring Cosmic Ray Air Showers from Space

1. Which term describes any object that exists in space? a. celestial object b. star c. planet d. asteroid

in the Mediterranean

Ch. 6: Smaller Bodies in the Solar System

Transcription:

Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 197 First results of Bosnia-Herzegovina Meteor Network (BHMN) Nedim Mujić 1 and Muhamed Muminović 1 Astronomical Society Orion Sarajevo nedim_mujic@bih.net.ba Astronomical Society Orion Sarajevo and Federal Hydrometeorological Institute Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Inspired by similar networks in the region, a video meteor network began since the spring of 013 in Bosnia and Herzegovina which currently includes eight stations. Further expansion of the network is under preparation by setting up another stations. The Network is managed by the Astronomical Society Orion Sarajevo together with the Federal Hydrometeorological Institute in Sarajevo whose meteorological stations were used for the installation of the cameras. By mid-june 015 the cameras of the BH meteor network had recorded over 0000 meteors and we had calculated more than 4000 orbits. In this paper we present the results of the first two years of operation of our meteor network. 1 Introduction The Bosnia-Herzegovina meteor network (BHMN) has been created and developed in the previous three years as a result of the work of members of the Astronomical Society Orion Sarajevo and their cooperation with the Federal Hydrometeorological Institute in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the first phase (August 01 May 013) we tested many CCTV cameras, housings, locations and software. In May 013., we started to set up the permanent stations in BiH and neighboring countries. In this paper we present the first results of the BiH meteor network. One is at a private house in Croatia. Basic information about all the locations of stations, orientation, field of view and precision of the cameras are given in Table 4. A map of the sky coverage of the BiH stations at an altitude of 100 km is shown in Figure. Stations and equipment Many of the CCTV cameras in use today for video surveillance in low light conditions have sufficient sensitivity to detect stars up to an apparent magnitude of +4, using a high-quality lens with a field of view in the order of 80x60 degrees. Astronomers recognized these opportunities and many models of these cameras are being used to monitor star occultations by asteroids and also for capturing meteors. After a certain period of testing various models, we acquired 7 cameras from the manufacturer idea Classic from Croatia (model DVC- CAM SM34LX-Ex) and 3 cameras from the manufacturer KT & C from Korea, (model KPC-350BH). Both types of cameras use a highly sensitive Sony Super HAD CCD chip. For all of these cameras we purchased lenses from the Japanese manufacturer Tokina, model TVR0398DCIR. Specifications of the chips and camera lenses are given in Table 1. and Table. below. Each station consists of a computer, UPS and a camera placed in a housing with heating in front of the window. In cooperation with the Federal Hydrometeorological Institute of the Federation of BiH we have set up eight permanent stations so far, mainly on buildings of existing hydrometeorological stations in various cities across BiH. Figure 1 Two types of cameras and the Tokina lens.

198 Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 Table 1 Specifications of the chips of the cameras. model format system chip DVC-CAM- SM34LX-Ex 1/3" PAL 5 fps KPC-350BH 1/3" NTSC 9.97 fps Table Specifications of the camera lenses. model Focal length F number 0.98 Iris TVR0398DCIR 3-8. mm manual automatic ICX55AL ICX54AL rectilinear. The quality of the orbits obtained, i.e. the uncertainty of the orbital elements and atmospheric path, depend significantly on the geometry of the specific case and the duration of the meteor. The best orbits are obtained in the case that the angle between the geometric planes of the two stations is near to 90 and the velocity of the meteor can be better determined if the duration is long. Because of this, UFOOrbit classifies orbits according to certain quality criteria. The best orbits are the so-called Q3 orbits for which it is required that the angle between two planes is at least 15 and the duration is at least 0.3 seconds. In addition, the angular length of the meteor trail at both stations needs to be at least 3, they should have at least a 50% of overlap and the difference in speeds calculated from each stations should not exceed 10%. There are also some other requirements concerning the height at which the meteor appeared, its geocentric velocity and the uncertainty in the determination of the radiant. 4 Shower statistics and special cases Figure The map of the sky coverage of the BiH stations at an altitude of 100 km. 3 Acquisition and processing All cameras are monochromatic and have an analog output, hence for digitization and recording we need a TV card with video input or a special video grabber. We have various models PCI TV cards in our computers, most of them from the manufacturers Hauppauge and EasyCap USB video grabbers. The acquisition of meteor data captured by a digitized video is done with the software package UFO produced by the Japanese meteor network SonotaCo 1. This package consists of three programs: UFOCapture for the recording of meteors, UFOAnalyzer for the calibration of the cameras fields of view and the measurements of the meteor coordinates in each frame of the video and UFOOrbit to compute the atmospheric trajectory and orbit of simultaneously recorded meteors. To search for a simultaneous meteor in a video among various cameras it is essential that the system clocks of the computers at each station is synchronized. This is done with the help of the Dimension 4 software which adjusts the system time of computers via the Internet synchronized every minute with time servers. The software UFOOrbit uses the so-called Method of planes (Ceplecha, 1987) to calculate the atmospheric trajectory and orbit in which, due to their very short duration, the meteor trajectories can be considered During the period of our existence, up to August 015, the cameras of the Bosnia and Herzegovina Meteor Network have recorded a total of 6978 meteors, of which 4670 have been recorded simultaneously by two or more cameras and have calculated orbits. The recorded meteors are from all major showers and their data are given in Table 3. From these calculated orbits, 694 are of highest quality (Q3) according to the parameters of the software UFOOrbit. The projections of their atmospheric trajectories and orbits are given in Figure 3and 4. A few fireballs have been recorded bright meteors accompanied by explosions, some of which had an absolute magnitude brighter than -5. Until now, the brightest fireball was captured on 1 November 013 at 3 h 36 m 59 s UTC, recorded by 3 stations of the BH network, stations of the Croatian Meteor Network and one station of the Italian meteor network. It lasted longer than 3 seconds and started at an altitude of about 90 km and ended at about 34 km above the city Zenica. According to the analysis which is still in progress, the absolute magnitude was between -8 and -9 and the initial mass of the object may have been around 10 kilograms. Table 3 Numbers of recorded meteors for some major showers. meteor shower number of meteors number of orbits number of Q3 orbits Orionids 01. 86 33 Perseids 013. 663 84 7 Orionids 013. 333 47 3 Geminids 013. 1081 0 5 Perseids 014. 1988 410 56 Orionids 014. 501 66 Geminids 014. 1381 88 78 Perseids 015. 1711 375 77 1 http://sonotaco.com/e_index.html

Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 199 Table 4 Basic information about all the locations of stations, orientation, field of view and precision of the cameras. location lat E long alt (m) resolution FOV azimuth elevation Pelješac 43.07 17.0318 10.0 704x58 80x60 15.07 47.16 7.0 Bihać 44.8078 15.8667 301.0 704x58 80x60 160.37 37.66 7.0 Gradačac 44.8700 18.4500 30.5 704x58 80x60 17.15 31.0 7.0 Mostar 43.3483 17.7933 97.0 704x58 70x5 78.81 51.9 6.0 Sarajevo - Zavod 43.8676 18.48 631.0 70x480 90x68 309.57 36.71 7.5 Sarajevo - Mejtaš 43.860 18.407 578.0 704x58 70x5 137.69 41.98 6.0 Bjelašnica I 43.7038 18.571 054.0 70x480 66x44 313.55 53.60 6.0 Bjelašnica II 43.7038 18.571 054.0 70x480 66x44 84.70 44.55 6.0 '/ pixel Figure 3 Projection of the trajectories of 694 double station meteors with the highest accuracy Q3. Figure 4 Radiants of all recorded meteors.

00 Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 Figure 5 A bright fireball captured on 1 November 013. from the Sarajevo, Pelješac and Gradačac stations. Another bright fireball was captured on September 13 th 014 at 00 h 54 m 41 s UTC by 3 stations of the BH network. It lasted longer than 6 seconds (the longest duration up to now) and started at an altitude of about 85 km over the city Travnik and ended at about 44 km above the city Gradačac. During its flight, it showed at least 5 explosions and there is a possibility that some of the fragments survived the atmospheric flight and eventually fell in the Posavina region near the border between Bosnia and Croatia. 5 Analysis of the Geminids 013 and the Perseids 014 In the study of the small bodies of the Solar system, in particular, meteor showers, the most commonly used criterion of mutual association of orbits of small bodies and their relation to the same shower or their associations with some parent body is called the Southworth- Hawkings criteria (Southworth and Hawkins, 1963). This criteria uses the orbital elements of the body and defines the distance between two orbits as: = (e B e A ) + (q B q A ) + [sin (i B i A ) ] + sin i A sin i B [sin (Ω B Ω A ) ] + [ (e B + e A ) sin (Ω B + ω B ) (Ω A + ω A ) ] Some authors have taken different value, below which two orbits are considered to belong to the same meteor showers or can be associated with a shower or with a known parent body. For the Geminids, which are a shower with well-defined orbits and a very sharp peak of activity, the value is one of the smallest. To investigate the quality of the data that we get, thanks to very favorable weather conditions that we had during the peak of the Geminids in December 013., we decided to compare our orbits with the orbits of the Japanese meteor network SonotaCo and with the orbit of the assumed parent body of the Geminids asteroid 300 Phaeton. Table 5 shows the orbital elements for 6 Geminids recorded during the night of their maximum December 13 14 013. Only the highest quality meteors were selected for this analysis (Q3 criterion in the program UFOOrbit). The Same procedure was applied to the 014 Perseids, for which we present 0 Q3 orbits together. We compare these with the mean orbit by SonotaCo and the orbit of the parent comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle (Table 6). 6 Conclusion The activities carried out so far by the Bosnia and Herzegovina meteor network showed the extreme usability of cheap video surveillance equipment for the recording of meteors which makes serious research possible in this field. The results we get (and which we will get in the future) with this equipment and methods will enable various statistical studies of meteor showers. In addition, as a patrol network that captures every clear night, our meteor network will sooner or later register fireballs that will survive their atmospheric flight and drop meteorites. After the analysis of such event it will be possible to calculate the site of fall. We have plans to expand our meteor network by setting up new stations that will allow to improve the quality of the results.

Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 01 Table 5 Orbital elements for 6 Geminids recorded during the night of their maximum December 13 14, 013. n Sol a q e i ω Ω α δ V g SonotaCo Phaeton 1 61.737 1.18 0.145 0.881 1.36 35.19 61.74 113.73 31.8 3.99 0.030 0.030 61.766 1.199 0.151 0.874.5 34.67 61.77 113.94 3.50 3.66 0.017 0.033 3 61.818 1.79 0.139 0.891 4.71 35.31 61.8 114.35 3.68 34.06 0.043 0.049 4 61.81 1.94 0.151 0.884.79 33.64 61.8 113.14 3.6 33.49 0.005 0.041 5 61.85 1.84 0.147 0.886 1.39 34.7 61.83 113.06 31.86 33.45 0.04 0.035 6 61.859 1.334 0.143 0.893 1.71 34.9 61.86 11.9 31.75 34.00 0.01 0.031 7 61.877 1.301 0.154 0.88.50 33.16 61.88 11.91 3.67 33.38 0.01 0.046 8 61.879 1.3 0.146 0.890 3.8 34.06 61.88 113.33 3.49 33.96 0.013 0.038 9 61.884 1.60 0.147 0.883 1.93 34.43 61.88 113.48 3.11 33.9 0.016 0.030 10 61.891 1.4 0.139 0.90 4.9 34.19 61.89 113.16 3.40 34.99 0.035 0.049 11 61.893 1.35 0.149 0.880 1.81 34.51 61.89 113.65 3.17 33.01 0.019 0.031 1 61.907 1.95 0.146 0.888 3.37 34.31 61.91 113.63 3.54 33.77 0.015 0.036 13 61.917 1.9 0.146 0.881 1.0 34.91 61.9 113.66 31.7 33.00 0.034 0.033 14 61.935 1.31 0.154 0.875.18 33.89 61.94 113.59 3.59 3.80 0.014 0.039 15 61.941 1.366 0.146 0.893 3.51 33.61 61.94 113.06 3.56 34.6 0.017 0.043 16 61.947 1.91 0.145 0.887 1.86 34.37 61.95 113.3 31.95 33.61 0.018 0.09 17 61.950 1.364 0.146 0.893.71 33.69 61.95 11.90 3.4 34.19 0.010 0.037 18 61.978 1.331 0.140 0.895.7 34.76 61.98 113.50 31.93 34. 0.01 0.06 19 61.989 1.376 0.143 0.896 3.06 34.0 61.99 113.10 3.18 34.44 0.016 0.035 0 61.99 1.77 0.146 0.886.65 34.48 61.99 113.71 3.7 33.57 0.01 0.08 1 6.01 1.30 0.148 0.888.7 33.80 6.01 113.5 3.37 33.80 0.005 0.035 6.014 1.6 0.157 0.87.4 33.56 6.01 113.66 3.85 3.65 0.016 0.043 3 6.018 1.79 0.149 0.883.10 34.01 6.0 113.41 3.4 33.38 0.01 0.03 4 6.03 1.43 0.146 0.897 3.53 33.14 6.0 11.73 3.5 34.61 0.0 0.048 5 6.09 1.305 0.147 0.887 3.16 34.04 6.03 113.56 3.51 33.77 0.011 0.035 6 6.167 1.9 0.147 0.881.50 34.81 6.17 114.9 3.9 33.1 0.00 0.05 mean 1.96 0.147 0.887.60 34.0 61.93 113.4 3.30 33.63 0.018 0.036 std.dev. 0.061 0.004 0.007 0.88 0.56 0.09 0.41 0.3 0.61 0.009 0.007 Table 6 0 Q3 quality orbits for the 014 Perseids compared to the mean orbit by SonotaCo and the orbit of the parent comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle. n Sol a q e i ω Ω α δ V g SonotaCo Swift- Tuttle 1 137.93 11.47 0.955 0.917 113.61 151.60 137.9 44.6 56.97 58.96 0.037 0.08 138.08 15.884 0.964 0.939 113.00 154.0 138.03 43.0 57.39 59.03 0.049 0.043 3 139.000 8.38 0.956 0.886 111.53 151.49 139.00 45.15 58.34 58.00 0.056 0.093 4 139.008 14.85 0.963 0.935 115.77 153.68 139.01 45.01 56.01 59.86 0.069 0.060 5 139.008 0.861 0.964 0.954 113.41 154.6 139.01 44.39 57.49 59.31 0.064 0.0 6 139.050 0.39 0.960 0.953 114.47 153.05 139.05 45.37 56.9 59.6 0.05 0.036 7 139.103 9.57 0.956 0.900 115.74 151.69 139.10 45.98 55.95 59.48 0.060 0.089 8 139.800 14.38 0.957 0.933 114.78 15.37 139.80 46.69 56.86 59.5 0.049 0.047 9 139.88 14.585 0.958 0.934 113.97 15.51 139.83 46.5 57.35 59.8 0.044 0.037 10 139.868 11.050 0.968 0.91 11.45 155.13 139.87 44.50 58.03 58.6 0.088 0.06 11 139.961 30.561 0.960 0.969 11.47 153.31 139.96 46.7 58.45 59.15 0.069 0.01 1 139.968 3.765 0.959 0.971 110.80 153.01 139.97 46.3 59.48 58.6 0.076 0.038 13 140.00 0.468 0.95 0.953 113.0 151.18 140.0 47.70 58.01 59.0 0.031 0.034 14 140.058 4.11 0.960 0.960 113.90 153.11 140.06 46.69 57.58 59.5 0.064 0.018 15 140.059 10.134 0.95 0.906 113.41 150.79 140.06 47.54 57.65 58.80 0.031 0.069 16 140.886 8.015 0.953 0.881 113.9 150.8 140.89 48.39 57.79 58.5 0.061 0.087 17 140.911 13.99 0.956 0.93 114.07 151.97 140.91 48.35 57.58 59.9 0.055 0.041 18 140.961.483 0.949 0.958 113.66 150.49 140.96 49.56 58.03 59.39 0.04 0.036 19 141.075 16.370 0.944 0.94 114.04 149.3 141.08 50.34 57.77 59.34 0.09 0.057 0 14.867 1.708 0.947 0.96 113.33 149.8 14.87 5.3 58.54 58.98 0.066 0.06 mean 16.649 0.957 0.933 113.55 15.18 139.87 46.71 57.61 59.13 0.055 0.051 std.dev. 6.955 0.006 0.06 1.0 1.54 1.14.7 0.83 0.44 0.016 0.04

0 Proceedings of the IMC, Mistelbach, 015 Finally the educational aspects of this work are also important. In activities of this network we include secondary school pupils or students of natural sciences who can conduct initial analysis allowing them to make a first experiences in serious scientific research. References Ceplecha Z. (1987). Geometric, dynamic, orbital and photometric data on meteoroids from photographic fireball networks. Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 38, 34. Southworth R. B. and Hawkins G. S. (1963). Statistics of meteor streams. Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics, 7, 61 85. Veres P. and Toth J. (010). Analysis of the SonotaCo video meteoroid orbits. WGN, Journal of the IMO, 38, 54 57. Nedim Mujić during his presentation (Photo by Axel Haas).