ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Similar documents
Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Stream Classification

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Rivers T. Perron

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

Forest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points

PolyMet NorthMet Project

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

Assessment. Assessment

GLG362/GLG598 Geomorphology K. Whipple October, 2009 I. Characteristics of Alluvial Channels

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Channel Pattern. Channel Pattern, Meanders, and Confluences. Description of Channel Pattern. Bridge (2003)

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Human Impacts to Rivers

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Start of Presentation: No notes (Introductory Slide 1) 1) Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) models are a type of habitat potential

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Annotated Bibliography of River Avulsions Pat Dryer Geography 364 5/14/2007

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

The Effects of Geomorphology and Watershed Land Use on Spawning Habitat

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

A GEOMORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO RESTORATION OF INCISED RIVERS. David L. Rosgen 1

Dolores River Watershed Study

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

Important Copyright Information

Consequences of river regulation works: altered fluvial processes + increasing flood hazard

Fluvial Geomorphology

Attachment D. Technical Memorandum, Susitna River Large Woody Debris Reconnaissance (March 2013)

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

1 INTRODUCTION AND MAJOR FINDINGS... 1

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Restoring the Napa River:

Surface Water and Stream Development

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Columbia Estuary Province

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Running Water: The Geology of Streams and Floods Running Water Chapter 14

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

Year 6. Geography. Revision

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

River Morphology. EAD 511 River management

River Nith restoration, cbec UK Ltd, October 2013 APPENDIX A

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

Working with Natural Stream Systems

Belt Width Delineation Procedures

Fresh Water: Streams, Lakes Groundwater & Wetlands

Integrating flood mitigation, sediment management and habitat enhancement on coastal rivers of British Columbia

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

Fluvial Geomorphic Guidelines

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

27. Running Water I (p ; )

Factors affecting confluence scour

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

Transcription:

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN Conor Shea - Hydrologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Partnerships Program Arcata, CA

Learning Objectives Examine Landscape and Watershed Controls that Create and Maintain Off-Channel Habitats Explain Controls on Typical Off-Channel Habitat Features: Location on Landscape Site Controls Design Concepts

Guiding Principle for Restoring or Creating Aquatic Habitat Successful Projects: Clearly Identify Habitat Goals and Objectives Identify and Recognize Landscape and Watershed Scale Controls Work With Geomorphic Processes and Remove Constraints Incorporate Geomorphically Appropriate Elements and Features

Climate and Geology Hierarchy of Geomorphic Controls and Processes Watershed Controls Flow and Sediment Regimes Short-term response Fluvial Processes & Channel Morphology Longerterm feedback Habitat Structure & Complexity Biotic Response

Geology Independent Landscape Drivers Controls topography (slope and confinement) Sediment Type and Supply Climate Controls amount of water (discharge)

Watershed Controls on Morphology and Habitat Sediment supply and Sediment size Discharge Channel slope

Role of Flow Regime

Flow and Sediment Controls on Morphology and Habitat Bank strength, Wood supply Sediment supply, Sediment size Floodplain Sediment Discharge Channel slope Valley confinement Channel Substrate

Climate and Geology Watershed Controls Successful Projects Work with Controlling Processes and Remove Constraints Flow and Sediment Regimes Fluvial Processes & Channel Morphology Habitat Structure & Complexity Biotic Response

Landscape and Watershed Controls at the Reach (Project) Scale Slope: Channel Valley Slope Breaks Sediment Channel Substrate Bank Material Floodplain Material Depth to Bedrock Valley Form Confined/Unconfined Vegetation Type Strength Wood Supply Water Supply Hydrologic Regime Temperature/DO Successful Projects Identify and Recognize Landscape and Watershed Scale Controls

Channel Slope as an Organizing Principle in Habitat Design Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Slope Controls on Sediment Properties UPLAND (STEEP) LOWLAND (SHALLOW) CHANNEL SUBSTRATE SIZE BANK COHESION FLOODPLAIN SUBSTRATE SIZE FLOODPLAIN EROSIVITY DEPTH OF ALLUVIUM SOURCE TO SINK

Slope Controls on Channel Morphology UPLAND (STEEP) LOWLAND (SHALLOW) CHANNEL WIDTH FLOODPLAIN WIDTH WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO SINUOSITY CONFINEMENT CHANNEL PATTERN: STRAIGHT -> BRAIDED -> MEANDERING -> DISTRIBUTIVE Stanley Schumm, 1977

Slope Controls on Habitat Characteristics UPLAND (STEEP) LOWLAND (SHALLOW) WOOD SUPPLY WOOD LENGTH / CHANNEL WIDTH RATIO CHANNEL COMPLEXITY COVER TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE VARIATION SHREDDERS -> GRAZERS -> FILTER FEEDERS

Channel Slope Zones Slope Category Salinity > 5% Above Anadromy Fresh 1% to 5% Steep Fresh < 1% Lowland Fresh < 1% Estuary Fresh/Brackish < 1% Tidal Brackish/Saline Note: Slope Categories are Fuzzy

Temporal and Spatial Variation in Habitat Use by Salmonids SPAWNING FRY DISPERAL EMERGENCE Map Northern Habitat California Use Through Coastal REARING Time Stream and Space DOWNSTREAM Example: - Storm Coho Dominated Salmon MIGRATION - Extended Dry Season

Habitat Varies in Space and Season

Off-Channel Habitat Design Clearly Identify Habitat Goals and Objectives Design Features Should: Support Specific Life-stage and Seasonal Habitat Needs Conform to Landscape and Watershed Controls Address Location within Watershed

Design Elements for Off-Channel Habitat in Steep Channels Objectives: Summer Rearing High Flow Refugia Design Elements Use of Bars Features Vegetated Bars/Islands Anabranch Channels Wood Structures

Bar Forms Bars Require: High Sediment Supply Variable Flow Regime Alternate (Point) Bars Attached to Bank Mobile/Persistent Topographic Steering Resistant Banks Medial (Center) Bars Split Flow Mobile Weak Bank Strength

Off-Channel Enhancements Using Back Bar Features: - High Flow Refugia - Summer Rearing - Habitat Complexity (High Velocity Gradient) - Water Quality Alternate Bars Source: Trinity River Restoration Program

Evolution of Cutoff Chutes & Alcoves Chutes Form When Head Loss Cause Upstream Water Surface to Overtop Bar Create by: Lowering Back Bar Height Increasing Head Loss By Adding Wood

Effect of Wood Loading τ 0 = ρghs Distance between Wood Pieces Increased Wood Loading increases: - flow depth - energy slope Manga and Kirchner 2000 Activate Off-channel Areas by Adding Wood

Habitat Value of Medial Bars Medial Bars: Mobile/Low Stability Create Flow Heterogeneity Overtopped by Flows Less than Bankfull Widen Channel Belt by Eroding Banks and Lead to: Vegetated Bars Islands Anabranch (Split) Channels

Vegetated Bars & Islands Vegetated Bars Bars Colonized by Vegetation Persistent Overtopped by Flows Less than Bankfull Islands Vegetated Bars which Accumulate Sediment and Grow in Elevation Above Bankfull Length Scales to Pool-Riffle Sequence Long-term Persistence Habitat Benefits Cover Increased Bank Length Velocity Complexity

Apex Bar Jam Abbe and Montgomery, 1996

Apex Bar Jams

Apex Bar Jam in Mattole

Engineered Log Jam

Anabranch Channels Channels with Longer Separation Multiple Pool-Riffle Sequences Island Widths Multiple Channel Widths Unconfined Anabranches (Type 5) May Form from Erosion of Floodplain Avulsion into Tributary Channel Nanson and Knighton, 1996

Constructing an Anabranch: Design Issues Location Entrance Configuration Exit Configuration Middle Dependent on Boundary Conditions

Anabranch Channel Location Specific Requirements -- Not Random Stable Anabranch Channels 5% - 20% of Total Flow Separated at Flows > Bankfull Discharge Typically Have Slope Advantage Ss > Sm Entrance at Riffle Head Generally on Inside of Bends Hard Point at Bifurcation Employ Abandoned Channels and Tributary Channels

Stable Entrance Characteristics Expanding Approach Channel Width Transverse Bed Head Drop In Main Branch Inlet Step In Side Branch Slope Advantage (Ss > Sm) Limited Bifurcation Angle Branch Asymmetry (Ws << Wm) Flow Separation Above Bankfull Burge 2006

Confluence Characteristics Downstream Bar On Minor Channel Side Avalanche Faces At Confluence Enhanced Scour in Channel Below Confluence

Design Elements for Off-Channel Habitat in Lowlands Objectives: Wet Season Rearing Summer Cool Water Refugia Floodplain Access Movement Cover Complexity Design Elements Cutoff Chutes Backwater Channels Seasonal Wetlands Anastomosed Streams Avulsions Wood Jams

Backwater Channel Formed Where Downstream Grade Control Elevates Water Surface Flow Appropriate for Lowland Stream Because: L b = h/s f

Backwater Channel Design: Salt Creek Grade Control

Backwater Sediment Issues If Sediment Load is present: - Channel Entrances May Become Blocked - Off-Channel Pools May Fill with Fine Sediment - Raising Backwater Height May Result in Channel Aggradation

Avulsion: Anastomosed Streams and Avulsions Rapid shift of channel belt into new location. Associated with channel aggradation and sinuous streams. New channels typically steeper than original. Anastomosed Streams: Channel form with parallel channels separate by wide, cohesive, vegetated floodplains.

Anastomosing Channel Benefits Multiple Channels Complex Habitat Taiya River, AK Use in Restoration Requires: Wide Floodplain Low Potential for Land-use Conflicts Abbe, Brooks, and Montgomery, 2003

Avulsions: Hazards & Opportunities

Opportunities: Access to Off-Channel Habitat Cross-basin Connectivity Hazards Channel Capture Flooding Stranding

Other Lowland Design Issues: Lack of Cover and Water Temperature Groundwater Connection Anoxic Soils Riparian Disturbance

Design Elements for Off-Channel Habitat in Estuaries Objectives: Wet Season Rearing Freshwater Refugia Permanently Flooded High Flow Refugia Movement Cover Complexity Design Elements Seasonal Freshwater Wetlands Wood Jams Channel Connectivity Cross Connections Restore Side-channels Tide Gate Improvements

Summary Clearly Identify Habitat Goals & Objectives Address Landscape & Watershed Controls Select Appropriate Design Elements Allow Processes to Work