Directorate E: Sectoral and regional statistics Unit E-4: Regional statistics and geographical information LUCAS 2018.

Similar documents
LUCAS: current product and its evolutions

Use of auxiliary information in the sampling strategy of a European area frame agro-environmental survey

Possible links between a sample of VHR images and LUCAS

LUCAS Technical reference document U1 LUCAS Survey data user guide. (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey)

Land Use and Land cover statistics (LUCAS)

LUCAS 2009 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey)

LUCAS: A possible scheme for a master sampling frame. J. Gallego, MARS AGRI4CAST

Sampling scheme for LUCAS 2015 J. Gallego (JRC) A. Palmieri (DG ESTAT) H. Ramos (DG ESTAT)

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems

Progress of UN-GGIM: Europe Working Group A on Core Data

COMBINING ENUMERATION AREA MAPS AND SATELITE IMAGES (LAND COVER) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AREA FRAME (MULTIPLE FRAMES) IN AN AFRICAN COUNTRY:

GISCO Working Party Meeting. 8 March 2012 Luxembourg. The ESPON 2013 Programme: State of Affairs. Marjan van Herwijnen project expert in the ESPON CU

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Advancing the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. Extent Account (Levels 1 and 2)

Progress of UN-GGIM: Europe Working Group A on Core Data

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Land Cover and Land Use Diversity Indicators in LUCAS 2009 data

Redesign sample for Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS) 2018

Plenary Session 2, part 2 A European shared information system

Habitats habitat concept, identification, methodology for habitat mapping, organization of mapping

The Combination of Geospatial Data with Statistical Data for SDG Indicators

UK Contribution to the European CORINE Land Cover

Spatial Disaggregation of Land Cover and Cropping Information: Current Results and Further steps

The Copernicus Climate Change (C3) service: State of play

The Added Value of Geospatial Data in a Statistical Office. Pedro Diaz Munoz Director Sectoral and Regional Statistics EUROSTAT European Commission

LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES - Vol. I - Land Use and Land Cover, Including their Classification - Duhamel C.

Geological information for Europe : Towards a pan-european Geological Data Infrastructure

EXPERT ANALYSIS ON GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIFICITIES

Estimation of the area of sealed soil using GIS technology and remote sensing

UN-GGIM: Europe ExCom 1 June 2016 Francfort Work Group A «Core Data» Status and Progress François Chirié, France

Land Monitoring Core Service Implementation Group (LMCS IG) - Results and Outlook

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

The Icelandic geographic Land Use database (IGLUD)

The Combination of Geospatial Data with Statistical Data for SDG Indicators

IAEG SDGs WG GI, , Mexico City

Copernicus for Statistics

SDI in Lombardia (Italy(

Spanish national plan for land observation: new collaborative production system in Europe

Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe (INSPIRE)

Discussion paper on spatial units

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Czech Republic

Geospatial workflows and potential applications to the Sustainable Development Goals of countries in West Asia

How proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions by Lewis Dijkstra and Hugo Poelman

ARCH PROJET Activity 1 -Synthesis-

Open Data meets Big Data

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services

Séminaire de l'umr Economie Publique. Spatial Disaggregation of Agricultural. Raja Chakir. February 21th Spatial Disaggregation.

Extent. Level 1 and 2. October 2017

International Atomic Energy Agency Learning programme: Radon gas. Module 4: Developing and Implementing a Representative Indoor Radon Survey

VCS MODULE VMD0018 METHODS TO DETERMINE STRATIFICATION

C o p e r n i c u s L a n d M o n i t o r i n g S e r v i c e

EVALUATING THE COST- EFFICIENCY OF REMOTE SENSING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Validation and verification of land cover data Selected challenges from European and national environmental land monitoring

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO COPERNICUS AND CAMS

Roadmap to interoperability of geoinformation

EAGLE Data Model and Outcomes of HELM (Harmonised European Land Monitoring)

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

European Regional and Urban Statistics

Update on INSPIRE; interoperable framework for natural hazards

Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES)

The Role of EO Consultants and SMEs within GMES. Geoff Smith

Update ecosystem services analysis in SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting

EAGLE concept, as part of the HELM vision

UN-GGIM: Europe Work Group on Data Integration. Facilitating the wider utilization of geospatial information to produce indicators

GGY 301: Research Methods

New LPIS data and their quality control in Macedonia. Pavel TROJACEK & Adam ZLOTY EKOTOXA s.r.o.

Labour Market Areas in Italy. Sandro Cruciani Istat, Italian National Statistical Institute Directorate for territorial and environmental statistics

Open call for tenders No EEA/MDI/14/001

INSPIRE Basics. Vlado Cetl European Commission Joint Research Centre.

EU-level landslide susceptibility assessment

Spatially enabling e-government through geo-services

Relevant data to produce SDG indicators in France

INSPIRE Monitoring and Reporting Implementing Rule Draft v2.1

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

I&CLC2000 in support to new policy initiatives (INSPIRE, GMES,..)

Accounting Units for Ecosystem Accounts Paper prepared by Alessandra Alfieri, Daniel Clarke, and Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division

ESBN. Working Group on INSPIRE

Copernicus Overview. Major Emergency Management Conference Athlone 2017

Standardization of the land cover classes using FAO Land Cover Classification System (LCCS)

INSPIRE - A Legal framework for environmental and land administration data in Europe

Land accounting in Québec: Pilot project for a sub-provincial area

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in support of negotiations of a DCFTA between the EU and Egypt

Measuring landscape diversity and fragmentation in EU agricultural areas from LUCAS Data

Mapping of ecosystems and their services in the EU and its Member States

Object Oriented Classification Using High-Resolution Satellite Images for HNV Farmland Identification. Shafique Matin and Stuart Green

European Topic Centre on Land Urban and Soil Systems. Green Infrastructure at EEA

Route to Biotope Data Standardization for the Protected Areas in Turkey

Fig. 1: Test area the Municipality of Mali Idjos, Cadastral Municipality Feketic

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARPATHIAN INTEGRATED BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

Spatial Units (Level 1)

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

INDICATORS FOR INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (ICZM)

Spatial units (Levels 0 and 1)

06/04/2015. Overview: Spatial units. Advancing the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Spatial units (Level 1)

Spatial Statistical Information Services in KOSTAT

UNSD SEEA-EEA revision 2020

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate E: Sectoral and regional statistics Unit E-4: Regional statistics and geographical information Doc. WG/LCU 52 LUCAS 2018 Eurostat Unit E4 Working Group for Land Cover and Land Use Statistics Meeting of 17 and 18 November 2016 Luxembourg BECH Building Room Quetelet starting on 17 November at 09h30 and planned to finish on 18 November at 13h00 CHAIRED BY: MR GUNTER SCHÄFER No interpretation, English only

1 INTRODUCTION Future LUCAS surveys were discussed in the framework of the Task Force on "LUCAS 2018 and beyond"; the assessment of user needs and requirements collected from Commission services related to land cover and land use information confirmed the need for aggregated statistics and the priority use of LUCAS in-situ information which provide valuable input for modelling. In particular the review of DG needs, through questionnaires and dedicated workshops prepared in cooperation with national experts, confirmed the general approach taken for the LUCAS survey. Moreover the need for specific analyses through dedicated additional modules, such as specific soil collection and/or dedicated modules for grassland have been identified and specified. The technical and financial preparation for LUCAS 2018 started in Q1 2016 and required a tight coordination of the user needs; survey 2018 is co-financed by DG AGRI, DG CLIMA, DG ENV and DG GROW. A revised stratification of Master Sample (LUCAS grid 2 by 2 Km) was launched. Content wise the survey 2018 includes pilot data collection concerning: 1) a Grassland module whose technical specifications have been circulated among MS, 2) new Soil Modules developed in tight cooperation with JRC; final documents expected by end October. In addition, some parameters of the core LUCAS are being reviewed to better adapt it to Copernicus needs. Sample design for LUCAS 2018 requires specific attention. 2 STRATIFICATION OF THE LUCAS MASTER The current LUCAS survey design is based on a two stage sampling process: i) First Phase (Base grid): The LUCAS base is obtained by using a 1 Km 2 grid (resulting from the INSPIRE recommendations) with a systematic spatial sampling design 1 which includes around 4.400.000 points in the entire European Union territory. ii) First Phase (Master grid): The LUCAS master is a subset of the base, comprising around N=1.100.000 points (corresponding to a 2 Km 2 grid covering the EU-28 territory, also systematically selected). Each of these points is classified into k land cover categories (the strata) on the basis of photointerpretation of aerial photos or satellite images. In 2005 these points in the master were stratified into 7 aggregated strata. iii) Second Phase (Sample): The final field sample is a sub-selection of the master. A sample of n points, out of N, is selected by strata and by NUTS2 and the n points are visited in order to determine the land cover and land use at a more detailed level. In such framework, the quality and timeliness of the stratification of the First Phase Master grid is very important for the accuracy of the statistical estimates. A revision of the existing LUCAS stratification, done using a recent image coverage of known positional accuracy, that covers also the countries presently missing in the master grid, is required to improve the quality of the sampling for the next LUCAS surveys. 1 The point selection is referred to as Systematic Spatial Sampling if the total area under study is divided into quadrants, the first point is randomly selected in a quadrant and the remaining N-1 points are placed in the same position within the corresponding quadrants. 2

Therefore an open call for tender has been launched in 2016 with the objective to classify a selection of 714.474 2 points of the master grid of LUCAS 2018 (a 2x2 Km grid of points which comprises a total of 1.097.964 points over the 28 EU member states) into one of 10 strata and one parameter, according to the instructions provided. The classification in strata is based on land cover characteristics and covers the following classes: arable land, permanent crops, grass, wooded areas, shrubs, bare surface (includinf low or rare vegetation), artificial constructions and sealed areas, transitional and coastal water and "impossible to photointerpret" (e.g. clouds ). Kick off meeting of the project will take place on 25 November. The project will last maximum 8 months. 3 NEW SPECIFIC MODULES IN LUCAS 2018 Based on the user needs surveys with DGs, that took place in 2014 2015 (questionnaire, bilateral meetings and dedicated workshops) the specific modules of the LUCAS field survey have been modified. Major drivers for these integrations are climate change and ecosystem services. The specific module on transects has been dropped, the specific module on soil has been extended and a new module for grassland has been introduced. Some specific elements for a better integration of the Copernicus needs have been added to the general survey. 3.1 Soil module The soil module in addition to the basic module - will also include a test run for soil biodiversity, the assessment of bulk density and an evaluation of the peat layers. 9,000 bulk density samples (records the weight of soil for a given volume required to calculate soil carbon stops increasing bulk density may be indicative of compaction; bulk density increases with compaction and tends to increase with depth); 1,000 samples for soil biodiversity; thickness of organic horizon in peat soils (c, 2,000 samples already identified in 2009/2015 important for climate change assessments); evidence of soil erosion. A detailed description is provided by the technical report of the JRC n the annex. 3.2 Pilot Grassland The goal of the new module on grassland is to assess the type of grassland, the intensity of the use and the ecological conditions. To this end an assessment of key flowering species and a selection of specific site parameters should be done. The grassland module has been developed by experts taking into account the different climatic and biological conditions (Adaptation of the Biogeographic regions of the EEA), the different site conditions and the possibility to identify key species by an average LUCAS surveyor. The full documentation is available in the annex. Being this a new development it is foreseen to implement a test version in 2018 on some 3800 points. 2 Points visited in the latest LUCAS surveys were excluded from the project. 3

3.3 Copernicus As concerns the adaptation to Copernicus this mainly consists in using a specific window of observation of 50 m. The extend of the land cover at the LUCAS point and the next land cover will be registered in the 4 cardinal directions up to a maximum distance of 50 m. Copernicus also requires some fine tuning of the LUCAS land use classification, e.g. separate U361: Amenities, leisure / museum and culture, Exclude combination G12/U111, collect information on airport/port for U317 Logistics & storage 4 SAMPLE 2018 LUCAS is a multipurpose platform for agro-environmental and landscape policy purposes. LUCAS scope includes a core part which is stable and the so called additional modules such as: 1) land covers transition and linear features in the transect (a 250 meter walk direction East) and 2) top-soil sample. The strength of the survey is the specific set up that allows, once on the spot, the collection of different variables (ad-hoc modules) according to the policy needs in different surveys. Commission DGs are the main final clients of the data collected in the LUCAS survey (micro data), and have expressed need for a LUCAS data collection in 2018 with a number of new requirements: 1) a new Soil package [27.000 top soil, of which 9.000 for bulk density, 2.000 for peat thickness and 1.000 frozen samples for biodiversity] 4 2) a Pilot on Grassland species on 3.700 points. 3) adaptation of the sample size to the Copernicus needs (densification of sample in selected areas). On average 2/3 of the points from the previous survey are kept in the field sample, but as the aim of LUCAS is also to monitor the changes in landscape it may not be worth visiting every survey areas which are likely not changing. In addition as LUCAS is a field survey the accessibility of the point has to be taken into account. Some areas cannot be reached because of natural features (for example high mountainous area) or because restricted access (private properties or military areas). The exclusion from target survey population of difficult to access areas causes bias in the final estimates; the exclusion of points below certain elevation and difficult to be accessed due to road distance and steepness, becomes critical in particular in mountain areas or remote islands. For survey 2015 Eurostat identified corrective measures for the statistical treatment of the areas excluded from the field survey for accessibility reasons, combining field survey with Photo Interpretation approach and ex-post added 66.000 Photo interpreted points to the field sample. Given all the requirements and the lesson learned, the sample design for LUCAS 2018 requires a tight coordination of the user needs and a global strategy for the field part and the Photo Interpretation part. A methodological contract will be launched to improve the quality of the current survey design and to propose a new global survey design for LUCAS 2018 with the following requirements: It covers all territory of EU including both field part and photo interpreted sample.

It takes into account accessibility of the single points, possibly revising the accessibility criteria used so-far. It takes into account the propensity to change of land cover. It fulfils the requirements and instructions for the new elements of the LUCAS 2018 survey (soil package, grassland module and Copernicus adaptation). It ensures as much as possible comparability with the previous LUCAS surveys. It allows solid estimation of main variables at the lowest regional level possible 5 OPEN ISSUES Risk analysis and mitigation actions concerning soil and access to private land should be foreseen in cooperation with Member States. 5