Failure surface according to maximum principal stress theory

Similar documents
CHAPTER 2 Failure/Fracture Criterion

MAE 322 Machine Design. Dr. Hodge Jenkins Mercer University

Pressure Vessels Stresses Under Combined Loads Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials and Fracture Criteria for Brittle Materials

Module 5: Theories of Failure

Lecture #8: Ductile Fracture (Theory & Experiments)

Static Failure (pg 206)

Steady Load Failure Theories

Plasticity R. Chandramouli Associate Dean-Research SASTRA University, Thanjavur

MAE 322 Machine Design Lecture 2. Dr. Hodge Jenkins Mercer University

Chapter 6: Plastic Theory

Classical fracture and failure hypotheses

Failure from static loading

Use Hooke s Law (as it applies in the uniaxial direction),

ME111 Instructor: Peter Pinsky Class #21 November 13, 2000

Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering ME 328 Machine Design, Spring 2019 Assignment 1 Review Questions

Lecture Triaxial Stress and Yield Criteria. When does yielding occurs in multi-axial stress states?

Lecture #7: Basic Notions of Fracture Mechanics Ductile Fracture

ANSYS Mechanical Basic Structural Nonlinearities

COMPLEX STRESS TUTORIAL 4 THEORIES OF FAILURE. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises.

Material is perfectly elastic until it undergoes brittle fracture when applied stress reaches σ f

MMJ1133 FATIGUE AND FRACTURE MECHANICS A - INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION

Bone Tissue Mechanics

Module-4. Mechanical Properties of Metals

Concept Question Comment on the general features of the stress-strain response under this loading condition for both types of materials

FME461 Engineering Design II

Structural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION

9 Strength Theories of Lamina

Structural Metals Lab 1.2. Torsion Testing of Structural Metals. Standards ASTM E143: Shear Modulus at Room Temperature

7.6 Stress in symmetrical elastic beam transmitting both shear force and bending moment

Path to static failure of machine components

ME 582 Advanced Materials Science. Chapter 2 Macromechanical Analysis of a Lamina (Part 2)

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING YIELD CRITERIA INSENSITIVE TO HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

C:\W\whit\Classes\304_2012_ver_3\_Notes\6_FailureAnalysis\1_failureMechanics_intro.doc p. 1 of 1 Failure Mechanics

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Brittle Deformation. Earth Structure (2 nd Edition), 2004 W.W. Norton & Co, New York Slide show by Ben van der Pluijm

2.1 Background of Piping Stresses

Introduction to Engineering Materials ENGR2000. Dr. Coates

MODELING OF CONCRETE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES. Kaspar Willam

Tectonics. Lecture 12 Earthquake Faulting GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD

The Frictional Regime

Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

This guide is made for non-experienced FEA users. It provides basic knowledge needed to start your fatigue calculations quickly.

Tutorial #1 - CivE. 205 Name: I.D:

1. Background. is usually significantly lower than it is in uniaxial tension

Principal Stresses, Yielding Criteria, wall structures

2. Mechanics of Materials: Strain. 3. Hookes's Law

Module 5: Failure Criteria of Rock and Rock masses. Contents Hydrostatic compression Deviatoric compression

3.032 Problem Set 5 Solutions Fall 2007 Start

Materials and Structures. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

ME 243. Mechanics of Solids

CHAPER THREE ANALYSIS OF PLANE STRESS AND STRAIN

Finite Element Solutions for Geotechnical Engineering

Patadiya Dharmeshkumar Makanlal. Aeroacoustics and Plasma Dynamics Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Nonlinear FE Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a Tresca-Type Yield Surface

Outline. Tensile-Test Specimen and Machine. Stress-Strain Curve. Review of Mechanical Properties. Mechanical Behaviour

SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Combined Stresses and Mohr s Circle. General Case of Combined Stresses. General Case of Combined Stresses con t. Two-dimensional stress condition

QUESTION BANK Composite Materials

Fatigue Algorithm Input

* Many components have multiaxial loads, and some of those have multiaxial loading in critical locations

THE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AS DEPICTED IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.

Tensile stress strain curves for different materials. Shows in figure below

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Fatigue calculations in ANSYS Workbench. Martin Eerme

Enhancing Prediction Accuracy In Sift Theory

A rate-dependent Hosford-Coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture at high strain rates

CHAPTER 15 THEORIES OF ELASTIC FAILURE. Summary TABLE Value in complex stress system. -[Uf + u: +a: 2E - 2V(UlU2 + u2u3 + u3u1)] -[(a1 - 12G

Rock Failure. Topics. Compressive Strength Rock Strength from Logs Polyaxial Strength Criteria Anisotropic Rock Strength Tensile Strength

DESIGN FOR FATIGUE STRENGTH

Predicting Fatigue Life with ANSYS Workbench

Numerical modeling of standard rock mechanics laboratory tests using a finite/discrete element approach

Rheology. What is rheology? From the root work rheo- Current: flow. Greek: rhein, to flow (river) Like rheostat flow of current

Spherical Pressure Vessels

Conceptual question Conceptual question 12.2

ME 202 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS SPRING 2014 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. EQUATIONS AND THEOREMS

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

CONTENTS. Lecture 1 Introduction. Lecture 2 Physical Testing. Lecture 3 Constitutive Models

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

σn -2α σ1= Maximum Principal Stress -2Θ

FE FORMULATIONS FOR PLASTICITY

Reference material Reference books: Y.C. Fung, "Foundations of Solid Mechanics", Prentice Hall R. Hill, "The mathematical theory of plasticity",

Laboratory 4 Bending Test of Materials

Tensor Transformations and the Maximum Shear Stress. (Draft 1, 1/28/07)

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

Mechanical Properties

Strain Transformation equations

Chapter 7. Highlights:

CIV E 205 Mechanics of Solids II. Course Notes

And similarly in the other directions, so the overall result is expressed compactly as,

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

MATERIAL MODELS FOR THE

Transcription:

Maximum Principal Stress Theory (W. Rankin s Theory- 1850) Brittle Material The maximum principal stress criterion: Rankin stated max principal stress theory as follows- a material fails by fracturing when the largest principal stress exceeds the ultimate strength σu in a simple tension test. That is, at the onset of facture, σ1 = σu OR σ3 = σu Crack will start at the most highly stressed point in a brittle material when the largest Principal stress at that point reaches σu Criterion has good experimental verification, even though it assumes ultimate strength is same in compression and tension Failure surface according to maximum principal stress theory This theory of yielding has very poor agreement with experiment. However, the theory has been used successfully for brittle materials. Used to describe fracture of brittle materials such as cast iron Limitations o Doesn t distinguish between tension or compression o Doesn t depend on orientation of principal planes so only applicable to isotropic materials Generalization to 3-D stress case is easy:

Maximum Shear Stress or Stress difference theory (Guest s or Tresca s Theory-1868)- Ductile Material The Tresca Criterion: Also known as the Maximum Shear Stress criterion. Yielding will occur when the maximum shear stress reaches that which caused yielding in a simple tension test. Recall that yielding of a material occurred by slippage between planes oriented at 45 to principal stresses. This should indicate to you that yielding of a material depends on the maximum shear stress in the material rather than the maximum normal stress. If σ1 > σ 2 > σ3 Then σ 1 σ 3 = σ y Failure by slip (yielding) occurs when the maximum shearing stress, τmax exceeds the yield stress τf as determined in a uniaxial tension test. This theory gives satisfactory result for ductile material. Failure surface according to maximum shear stress theory Strain Energy Theory (Haigh s Theory) This theory is based on the assumption that strains are recoverable up to the elastic limit, and the energy absorbed by the material at failure up to this point is a single valued function independent of the stress system causing it. The strain energy per unit volume causing failure is equal to the strain energy at the elastic limit in simple tension.

Shear Strain Energy Theory (Distortion Energy Theory or Mises-Henky Theory or Von-Misses Theory)-Ductile Material Also known as the Maximum Energy of Distortion criterion Based on a more complex view of the role of the principal stress differences. In simple terms, the Von-Mises criterion considers the diameters of all three Mohr s circles as contributing to the characterization of yield onset in isotropic materials. When the criterion is applied, its relationship to the uniaxial tensile yield strength is: F or a state of plane stress ( σ3 =0) σ1 2 σ 1σ 2 + σ 2 2 = σ y 2 It gives very good result in ductile material.

Maximum Principal Strain Theory (St. Venant Theory) According to this theory, yielding will occur when the maximum principal strain just exceeds the strain at the tensile yield point in either simple tension or compression. If ε1 and ε2 are maximum and mini mum principal strains corresponding to σ1 and σ2, in the limiting case Mohr s theory- Brittle Material Mohr s Theory Mohr s theory is used to predict the fracture of a material having different properties in tension and compression. Criterion makes use of Mohr s circle In Mohr s circle, we note that τ depends on σ, or τ = f(σ). Note the vertical line PC Represents states of stress on planes with same σ but differing τ, which means the weakest plane is the one with maxim um τ, point P. Points on the outer circle are the weakest planes. On these planes the maximum and minimum principal stresses are sufficient to decide whether or not failure will occur. Experiments are done on a given material to determine the states of stress that result in failure. Each state defines a Mohr s circle. If the data are obtained from simple tension, simple compression, and pure shear, the three resulting circles are adequate to construct an envelope (AB & A B ) Mohr s envelope thus represents the locus of all possible failure states. Higher shear stresses are to the left of origin, since most brittle materials have higher strength in compression Comparison A comparison among the different failure theories can be made by superposing the yield surfaces as shown in figure