ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

Similar documents
Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Chapter 6 Seismic Design of Bridges. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

Pushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures

18. FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. The Dynamic Analysis of a Structure with a Small Number of Nonlinear Elements is Almost as Fast as a Linear Analysis

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Frame Buildings

midas Civil Dynamic Analysis

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Improving the earthquake performance of bridges using seismic isolation

DETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

BRB and viscous damper hybrid vibration mitigation structural system: seismic performance analysis method and case studies

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

Prof. A. Meher Prasad. Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

Bracing for Earthquake Resistant Design

Boundary Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

Seismic performance evaluation of existing RC buildings designed as per past codes of practice

Inclusion of a Sacrificial Fuse to Limit Peak Base-Shear Forces During Extreme Seismic Events in Structures with Viscous Damping

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Webinar Program Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design of Bridges. Thursday, June 22, :00-3:30 PM ET

Seismic design of bridges

Challenges in Collapse Prediction for Steel Moment Frame Structures

Effect of eccentric moments on seismic ratcheting of single-degree-of-freedom structures

PRACTICAL USES OF NONLINEAR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Non-Linear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Seismic Applications

NONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH

COLUMN INTERACTION EFFECT ON PUSH OVER 3D ANALYSIS OF IRREGULAR STRUCTURES

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

Introduction to structural dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Force Based Design Fundamentals. Ian Buckle Director Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research University of Nevada, Reno

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure

A. Belejo, R. Bento & C. Bhatt Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 1.INTRODUCTION

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridges under Earthquakes

Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8

Modelling Seismic Isolation and Viscous Damping

Methods of Analysis for Earthquake- Resistant Structures

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering endorsed in Earthquake Engineering

ESTIMATING PARK-ANG DAMAGE INDEX USING EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD FOR A BUILDING WITH CENTER CORE REINFORCED CONCRETE WALLS AND EXTERIOR STEEL FLAME

Influence of cracked inertia and moment-curvature curve idealization on pushover analysis

OpenSees Navigator. OpenSees Navigator

Safety Margin Ratio-Based Design of Isolation Gap Size for Base-isolated Structures

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF STEEL COLUMNS WITH COMBINED HIGH AXIAL LOAD AND DRIFT DEMAND

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

COLUMN BASE WEAK AXIS ALIGNED ASYMMETRIC FRICTION CONNECTION CYCLIC PERFORMANCE

Behavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns

HYSTERETIC PERFORMANCE OF SHEAR PANEL DAMPERS OF ULTRA LOW- YIELD-STRENGTH STEEL FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL OF BUILDINGS

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Response of Elastic and Inelastic Structures with Damping Systems to Near-Field and Soft-Soil Ground Motions

INVESTIGATION OF JACOBSEN'S EQUIVALENT VISCOUS DAMPING APPROACH AS APPLIED TO DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN

SEISMIC RESPONSE EVALUATION OF AN RC BEARING WALL BY DISPLACEMENT-BASED APPROACH

A STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

P-Delta Effects in Limit State Design of Slender RC Bridge Columns

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

Coupling Beams of Shear Walls

A PROGRESS REPORT ON ATC 55: EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF INELASTIC SEISMIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURES (FALL 2002)

Chord rotation demand for Effective Catenary Action under Monotonic. Loadings

SECANT MODES SUPERPOSITION: A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMES

MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I

RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Collapse modes of structures under strong motions of earthquake

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

System Identification procedures for nonlinear response of Buckling Restraint Braces J. Martínez 1, R. Boroschek 1, J. Bilbao 1 (1)University of Chile

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

Nonlinear numerical simulation of RC frame-shear wall system

Giacomo Boffi. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Ambientale e Territoriale Politecnico di Milano

Junya Yazawa 1 Seiya Shimada 2 and Takumi Ito 3 ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

New Seismic Design Provisions in Japan

Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns

ROSESCHOOL ANALYSIS OF CODE PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: ITALIAN SEISMIC CODE, EC8, ATC-40, FEMA356, FEMA440

Sensitivity and Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Frame Structures

AN INNOVATIVE ELASTO-PLASTIC ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR THE STRUCTURAL AND NON-STRUCTURAL BUILDING PROTECTION

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Mechanics of Materials

Seismic Design of New R.C. Structures

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region

Software Verification

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

LARSA 2000 Reference. for. LARSA 2000 Finite Element Analysis and Design Software

A Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Procedure Consistent with New Zealand Standards

Transcription:

ENERGY DIAGRAM

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR

STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS

INELASTIC WORK DONE

HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR

MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP

IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION

DUCTILITY LATERAL LOAD Brittle Partially Ductile Ductile DRIFT

CAPACITY DESIGN STRONG COLUMNS & WEAK BEAMS IN FRAMES REDUCED BEAM SECTIONS LINK BEAMS IN ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES BUCKLING RESISTANT BRACES AS FUSES RUBBER-LEAD BASE ISOLATORS HINGED BRIDGE COLUMNS HINGES AT THE BASE LEVEL OF SHEAR WALLS ROCKING FOUNDATIONS OVERDESIGNED COUPLING BEAMS OTHER SACRIFICIAL ELEMENTS

PERFORMANCE LEVELS Restaurant Restaurant Restaurant Operational Immediate Occupancy Life Safety Collapse Prevention Less Damage More Damage Ref: FEMA 451 B

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

IDEALIZED FORCE DEFORMATION CURVE

ASCE 41 BEAM MODEL

ASCE 41 MOMENT HINGE

STRENGTH vs. DEFORMATION ELASTIC STRENGTH DESIGN - KEY STEPS CHOSE DESIGN CODE AND EARTHQUAKE LOADS DESIGN CHECK PARAMETERS STRESS/BEAM MOMENT GET ALLOWABLE STRESSES/ULTIMATE PHI FACTORS CALCULATE STRESSES LOAD FACTORS (ST RS TH) CALCULATE STRESS RATIOS INELASTIC DEFORMATION BASED DESIGN -- KEY STEPS CHOSE PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND DESIGN LOADS ASCE 41 DEMAND CAPACITY MEASURES DRIFT/HINGE ROTATION/SHEAR GET DEFORMATION AND FORCE CAPACITIES CALCULATE DEFORMATION AND FORCE DEMANDS (RS OR TH) CALCULATE D/C RATIOS LIMIT STATES

ASCE 41 ASSESSMENT OPTIONS Linear Static Analysis Linear Dynamic Analysis (Response Spectrum or Time History Analysis) Nonlinear Static Analysis (Pushover Analysis) Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis (NDI or FNA)

PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS BRIDGE CATEGORIES LIFELINE BRIDGES MAJOR-ROUTE BRIDGES OTHER BRIDGES PERFORMANCE LEVELS SERVICE IMMEDIATE DAMAGE MINIMAL DAMAGE GROUND MOTION LEVELS PROBABILITY IN 50 YEARS 10% RETURN PERIOD 475 YEARS LIMITED REPAIRABLE DAMAGE 5% 975 YEARS SERVICE DISRUPTION EXTENSIVE DAMAGE 2% 2475 YEARS LIFE SAFETY PROBABLE REPLACEMENT

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

F-D RELATIONSHIP

DUCTILITY LATERAL LOAD Brittle Partially Ductile Ductile DRIFT

ASCE 41 DUCTILE AND BRITTLE

FORCE AND DEFORMATION CONTROL

BACKBONE CURVE

HYSTERESIS LOOP MODELS

STRENGTH AND DEGRADATION

ASCE 41 DEFORMATION CAPACITIES This can be used for components of all types. It can be used if experimental results are available. ASCE 41 gives capacities for many different components.

PLASTIC HINGE MODEL It is assumed that all inelastic deformation is concentrated in zero-length plastic hinges. The deformation measure for D/C is hinge rotation.

ASCE 41 ROTATION CAPACITIES This can be used for components of all types. It can be used if experimental results are available. ASCE 41 gives capacities for many different components..

STEEL COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING MODEL

CONCRETE COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

FEMA PMM HINGE

CONCRETE COLUMN FIBER HINGE MODEL Reinforced Concrete Column Steel Rebar Fibers Confined Concrete Fibers Unconfined Concrete Fibers

SHEAR WALL FIBER HINGE MODEL Reinforcement Layout Steel Fibers Confined Concrete Fibers Unconfined Concrete Fibers

MATERIAL STRESS-STRAIN CURVES Unconfined and Confined Concrete ( Compared ) Confined Concrete Steel

STRAIN AS PERFORMANCE MEASURE Strain Limit Fully confined concrete compressive strain 0.015 Unconfined concrete compressive strain 0.005 Rebar tensile strain 0.05 Rebar compressive strain 0.02

PIER AND SPANDREL FIBER MODELS

BRIDGE SECTIONS AND FIBER MODELS B R I D G E C R O S S S E C T I O N S F I B E R M O D E L S OF C R O S S S E C T I O N S

SHEAR HINGE MODEL

PANEL ZONE ELEMENT

NONLINEAR SOLUTION SCHEMES ƒ iteration 1 2 ƒ iteration 1 2 3 4 5 6 ƒ ƒ u u u u NEWTON RAPHSON ITERATION CONSTANT STIFFNESS ITERATION

THE POWER OF RITZ VECTORS APPROXIMATELY THREE TIMES FASTER THAN THE CALCULATION OF EXACT EIGENVECTORS IMPROVED ACCURACY WITH A SMALLER NUMBER OF VECTORS CAN BE USED FOR NONLINEAR ANALYSIS TO CAPTURE LOCAL RESPONSE

FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS (FNA) DISCRETE NONLINEARITY FRAME AND SHEAR WALL HINGES BASE ISOLATORS (RUBBER & FRICTION) STRUCTURAL DAMPERS STRUCTURAL UPLIFT STRUCTURAL POUNDING BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES

RITZ VECTORS

FNA ADVANTAGES MODAL SOLUTION - NO STIFFNESS REDUCTION CLOSED FORM SOLUTION VERY FAST TIME STEP INDEPENDENT CAPTURES HIGH FREQUENCY RESPONSE RITZ VECTORS CALCULATED ONCE MULTIPLE TIME HISTORIES ARE FAST

FNA KEY POINT The Ritz modes generated by the nonlinear deformation loads are used to modify the basic structural modes whenever the nonlinear elements go nonlinear.

DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS.. M u.. M u t +. C u + Ku = 0 +. C u + Ku = - u.. + x w. 2 2 u + w u = - M u g.. u g.. M K.. u g C

RESPONSE FROM GROUND MOTION. u.. + 2xwu + w 2 u = A + B t = - u.. g.. ug.. u g 2 2 t 1.. u g 1 1 t 2 t

CLOSED FORM DAMPED RESPONSE. t e { [ u. B u t = - ] cos - xw t1 2 w 1 [ (. B + A - 2 w ut - xw ut + )] sin wd t } + w w d - t A B u t = e xw 2x { [u t - + ] cos 1 2 3 w w w d t 1 1 2 2 1 xa B x - + [ u. ( 2 1) t + xwu t - + ] sin wd t } w 1 1 d w 2 w A 2xB Bt + [ - + ] 2 3 2 w w w w d t 2 B w

UNDAMPED RESPONSE ) ( ] [ Bt A t sin B u u t 1 t + + - + = 2 2 1 1 w w w w. ] [ t cos A u 1 t - 2 2 2 2 1 B t sin u A t cos B u u 1 1 t t t + - + - = ] [ ] [. w w w w w w w w

STEP BY STEP DYNAMIC ANALYSIS Ground Accn = u g K C Effective load = M R = -Mu g Displ = u Veloc = u Accn = u At any point in time, dynamic equilibrium is : Mu + Cu + Ku = R Over a time step, Dt, dynamic equilibrium is : M Du + C Du + K Du = DR This equation can be solved by step-by-step methods. There is one equation with three unknowns (Du, Du, Du), so assumptions must be made and the solution is approximate.

STEP-BY-STEP INTEGRATION (CAA) u 1 u 0 u 0 u 0 u 1 u 0 R 1 R 0 Dt Du Du Du DR Equilibrium : M Du + C Du + K Du = DR From Kinematics : Du = Dt (u + u ) = Dt 2 (2u + Du ) 0 1 0 2 Du = Dt (u + u ) = Dt 2 (2u + Du ) 0 1 0 2 Hence get effective stiffness and load : K 4 Dt M + 2 eff = 2 C + K Dt DR 4 eff = -Mu g + M(2u + u 0 ) + 2C Dt 0 u 0 Solve K eff Du = Then : DR eff Du = -2u + 2 0 Du Dt Du = -2u + 2 Du 0 Dt

BASIC DYNAMICS WITH DAMPING Mu&& + Cu& + Ku = 0 t Mu&& + Cu& + Ku = - Mu&& g u & + xwu& + w 2 2 u = -u& g M K C u& & g

RESPONSE MAXIMA u = t u cos( w t) 0 u& t = -w u sin( w t 0 ) u&& t = -w 2 u cos( w t) 0 u& & max = -w 2 u max

DISPL, in. DISPL, in. GROUND ACC, g DISPLACEMENT, inches RESPONSE SPECTRUM GENERATION 0.40 Earthquake Record 16 0.20 14 0.00-0.20-0.40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 TIME, SECONDS 12 10 8 6 4.00 T= 0.6 sec 4 2 2.00 0.00-2.00-4.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 T= 2.0 sec 8.00 4.00 0.00-4.00-8.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 PERIOD, Seconds Displacement Response Spectrum 5% damping

VELOCITY, in/sec ACCELERATION, g DISPLACEMENT, in. SPECTRAL PARAMETERS 16 12 8 4 PS PS = = w w V S d a PS v 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 PERIOD, sec 40 1.00 30 0.80 0.60 20 0.40 10 0.20 0 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 PERIOD, sec PERIOD, sec

Spectral Acceleration, Sa Spectral Acceleration, Sa 0.5 Seconds 1.0 Seconds 2.0 Seconds THE ADRS SPECTRUM RS Curve ADRS Curve Period, T Spectral Displacement, Sd

THE ADRS SPECTRUM

ASCE 7 RESPONSE SPECTRUM

PUSHOVER

THE LINEAR PUSHOVER

EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION How far to push? The Target Point!

DAMPING COEFICIENT FROM HYSTERESIS

DAMPING COEFICIENT FROM HYSTERESIS

DISPLACEMENT MODFICATION Calculating the Target Displacement d = C C C S T 2 / (4p 2 ) 0 1 2 a e C 0 Relates spectral to roof displacement C 1 Modifier for inelastic displacement C 2 Modifier for hysteresis loop shape

ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKES CREATING HISTORIES TO MATCH A SPECTRUM FREQUENCY CONTENTS OF EARTHQUAKES FOURIER TRANSFORMS

MATCHING THE SPECTRUM

FOURIER TRANSFORMS

ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES Friction Isolator Rubber Isolator Oil Damper Friction Damper Buckling-Restrained Brace (BRB)

RATING FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE CoRE Rating Safety Reparability Functionality 5-Star Life Safe Loss <5% 4-Star Life Safe Loss <10% 3-star Life Safe Loss <20% Occupiable Immediately Functional < 72 hours Occupiable Immediately Functional < 1 month Occupiable < 1 month Functional < 6 months Certified Life Safe Not estimated Not estimated Not Certified Life Safety Hazard Not estimated Not estimated

DAMAGE ANALYSIS Servers/Network, 7% Computers, 6% Cabinets, 1% Bookcases, 1% Roof Equipment, 1% Cladding, 2% Partitions, 27% Elevators, 21% Moment Frame, 2% Ceiling, 32%

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS SURVEY