Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Similar documents
Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

Comparison protocol EURAMET project

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt

Final Report on the Torque Key Comparison CCM.T-K2 Measurand Torque: 0 kn m, 10 kn m, 20 kn m Dirk Röske 1), Koji Ogushi 2)

CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503

PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT OF CALIBRATION SYSTEMS FOR ANGULAR VIBRATION PICKUPS

SIM Regional Comparison on. The Calibration of Internal and External Diameter Standards SIM.L-K FINAL REPORT July 2012

TRACEABILITY STRATEGIES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF GEAR AND SPLINE ARTEFACTS

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram

< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

INVESTIGATION OF IMPACT HAMMER CALIBRATIONS

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

A Comprehensive Overview of the Laser Based Calibration Facility at Measurement Standards Laboratory

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

Fundamentals of Low Intensity Shock Calibration

Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)

Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands

Classification of services in Acoustics, Ultrasound and Vibration

Final Report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 Comparison of Spectral Irradiance 250 nm nm

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

RECENT ILC ACTIVITY IN ROMANIAN MASS MEASUREMENTS

FINAL REPORT ON KEY COMPARISON APMP.AUV.A-K3

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition

UNCERTAINTY SCOPE OF THE FORCE CALIBRATION MACHINES. A. Sawla Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100, D Braunschweig, Germany

EA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE

FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO).

Modelling of a dynamic torque calibration device and determination of model parameters

DEVELOPMENT OF ANGULAR VELOCITY CALIBRATION FACILITY USING SELF-CALIBRATABLE ROTARY ENCODER

MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF A 250 KN SHOCK FORCE CALIBRATION DEVICE

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Determination of uncertainty for volume measurements made using the gravimetric method

Final Report on Comparison of Hydraulic Pressure Balance Effective Area Determination in the Range up to 80 MPa

OIML R 141 RECOMMENDATION. Edition 2008 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON BETWEEN TUBITAK-UME TURKEY AND INM ROMANIA IN THE FIELD OF FORCE MEASUREMENTS

Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Certification of a High Capacity Force Machine for Testing of Load Cells According to OIML R60

Traceability of on-machine measurements under a wide range of working conditions

COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY

Diagnostic testing of the comparator carriage vibrations

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard

METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION

The National Unitary Institution "Belarusian State Institute of Metrology" (BelGIM)

Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices

Calibration and verification: Two procedures having comparable objectives and results

Bilateral comparison on micro-cmm artefacts. between PTB and METAS. Final report

SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn

Comparison Euramet 898

Metallic materials Knoop hardness test. Part 1: Test method. Matériaux métalliques Essai de dureté Knoop Partie 1: Méthode d'essai

T20WN. Data Sheet. Torque transducers. Special features. Installation example with bellows couplings. B en

Characterization of Force Transducers for Dynamic Measurements

Analysis of shock force measurements for the model based dynamic calibration

OIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air

CCL-K5. CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars. Final Report

Measurement & Uncertainty - Basic concept and its application

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Primary Method for the Complex Calibration of a Hydrophone from 1 Hz to 2 khz

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

COMPLETION AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET OF THE MULTI-COMPONENT MEASURING DEVISE FOR FORCE UP TO 1 MN AND TORQUE UP TO 2 KN M

Ajchara Charoensook, Chaiwat Jassadajin. National Institute of Metrology Thailand. Henry Chen, Brian Ricketts and Leigh Johnson

Centre for Metrology and Accreditation, MIKES

Implementation of MRA NMIs, BIPM,RMO-TCs Improvement of Global Measurement Standards NMIs, BIPM

Vocabulary of Metrology

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

Nanometrology and its role in the development of nanotechnology

Supplementary Comparison EUROMET.EM-S23 EURAMET PROJECT No 815 FINAL REPORT

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks

Withdrawn at December 31, Guideline DKD-R 5-7. Calibration of Climatic Chambers DEUTSCHER KALIBRIERDIENST

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards

Measurement method for the proficiency testing program

The Uncertainty Principle

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z

EUROMET Project 702 EUROMET.M.D-K4

Uncertainty restrictions of transfer click torque wrenches

EUROMET Comparison of a 10 mh Inductance Standard at 1 khz EUROMET.EM-K3. Final Report

GULF ASSOCIATION FOR METROLOGY. Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method GULFMET.L-S1

GMA STATISTICS Countries. Achievements of metrology HRD service for Foreign customers in 2018

Physikalisch- Technische Bundesanstalt

For the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

APPLICATION OF A SCANNING VIBROMETER FOR THE PERIODIC CALIBRATION OF FORCE TRANSDUCERS

Electricity and Magnetism Supplementary Guide to the JCRB Instructions for Appendix C of MRA

Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum

Transcription:

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1 Updated at 12-December-2012 Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM MRA the consultative committees of the CIPM have the responsibility to establish degrees of equivalence (DoE) between the different measurement standards operated by the national NMIs. This is done by conducting key comparisons (KC) on different levels of the international metrological infrastructure. Specifically in the field of linear vibration, the first top level KC (CCAUV.V-K1) was finished in 2001 and the second KC (CCAUV.V-K2) is on-going now. Their results have been then the foundation of all subsequently established DoE in the field of linear vibration. Unlike the field of linear vibration, however, neither bilateral nor KC in the field of angular vibration has been done between NMIs. It is necessary that at least two NMIs, which have the capability of the primary angular vibration calibration by laser interferometry, launch the first bilateral comparison. The results of this bilateral comparison will, after approval for equivalence, form a new basis for DoE and therefore be the foundation for the registration of calibration and measurement capabilities (CMC) in the framework of the CIPM MRA. The specific task of this comparison to measure the complex charge (or voltage) sensitivity of two different angular accelerometers at specified frequencies with primary means, i.e. according to ISO 16063-15 Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers -- Part 15: Primary angular vibration calibration by laser interferometry. The reported sensitivities and associated uncertainties are then supposed to be used for the calculation of the DoE between the participating NMIs and the comparison reference value. Pilot Laboratory Pilot laboratory for this bilateral comparison is Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) Working Group Acceleration Bundesallee 100 Page 1 of 5

38116 Braunschweig Germany This is the delivery address for the set of artefacts and the written and signed reports. Contact Persons are Dr. Thomas Bruns Angelika Taubner Tel.: +49 531 592 1220 Tel.: +49 531 592 1221 e-mail (both): ccauv.v-k2@ptb.de Fax :(49) 531 592 69 1248 Devices under Test and Measurement Conditions For the calibration task of this bilateral comparison two angular accelerometers (working standards in PTB and KRISS) will be circulated between two laboratories. The first one is the KRISS working standard being a back to back (BB) typed piezoelectric angular accelerometer, namely Bruel & Kjær type 4381-ROT (S.N. 30001). The second one is the PTB working standard being a angular accelerometer Jewell type ASMP-200 (S.N. 50563). The angular accelerometers are to be calibrated for the magnitude and phase of their complex charge sensitivity according to those procedures and conditions implemented by the NMI in conformance with ISO 16063-15 which provide magnitude and phase information of the artefact. The charge/voltage sensitivities shall be reported for either the accelerometers alone (excluding any effects from the charge amplifier) or the combined accelerometer and charge amplifier. The frequency range of the measurements will be from 0.4 Hz to 1 khz. Specifically the laboratories are supposed to measure at the following frequencies (all values in Hz): 0.4, 0.5, 0.63(or 0.64), 0.8, 1, 1.25, 1.6, 2, 2.5, 3.15 (or 3.2), 4, 5, 6.3 (or 6.4), 8, 10, 12.5, 16, 20, 25, 31.5 (or 32), 40, 50, 63 (or 64), 80, 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315 (or 320), 400, 500, 630 (or 640), 800, and 1000. The participating laboratories shall be able to provide magnitude and phase results over the whole frequency range where their systems can support. The charge amplifier used for the calibration may be not provided with the set of the artefacts, and, if necessary, must be provided by each participant. The measurement condition should be kept according to the laboratory's standard conditions for calibration of customer accelerometers for claiming their best measurement capability or CMC where applicable. This presumes that these conditions comply with those defined by the applicable ISO documentary standards [1,2,3], simultaneously. Page 2 of 5

Real measurement conditions during this comparison may depend on the primary angular vibration systems in KRISS and PTB. Angular acceleration amplitudes: 2.0 ~ 565.6 rad/s 2 -peak. Ambient temperature and accelerometer temperature during the calibration: (23 ± 2)ºC (actual values to be stated within tolerances of ± 0.3ºC). The accelerometer temperature should be measured and reported. Relative humidity: max. 75 % Mounting torque of the accelerometer: (2.0 ± 0.1) N m Circulation Type, Schedule and Transportation The transducers are circulated with a measurement period of four weeks provided for each participant. The initial and final measurements are made by the pilot lab in order to monitor the stability and any change of the vibration response characteristics of the artifacts. The measurements will start immediately after approval of this technical protocol by CCAUV. The cost of transportation to and from a participating laboratory shall be covered by the participating laboratory. The accelerometers have to be send by an international logistic service providing a tracking system. The transportation has to include an insurance covering a value of 9,000 Euros in case the set of accelerometers gets damaged or lost during transportation. The artefacts may be hand-carried by a member of the participating laboratory. Measurement and Analysis Instructions The participating laboratories have to observe the following instructions: The charge amplifier for the measurement of the accelerometer's response has to be calibrated with equipment traceable to national measurement standards. The angular accelerometers should be mounted on the (polished) flat surface of the vibration table where moving optic components are rigidly installed. The mounting surface of the accelerometer and the moving part of the angular exciter must be slightly lubricated before mounting. The cable between accelerometer and charge amplifier, if necessary, should be taken from the set of DUT delivered to the laboratory. It is advised that the measurement results should be compiled from complete measurement series carried out at different days under nominally the same conditions, except that the angular accelerometer is remounted and the cable reattached. The standard deviation of the subsequent measurements should be included in the report. Page 3 of 5

For angular acceleration signals (t) of the form ( ) ˆ cos( ), (1) t t o the respective charge/voltage output signal of the transducer q(t) of the form q( t) qˆ cos( t ), (2) q o and the phase is defined according to ISO 16063-15 as q. (3) For the measurement of the phase of the sensitivity the delay or phase characteristics of the interferometer channel(s) has to be taken into account, since the photo-diodeamplifier-system (typically, optic receiver(s) and related electronics) has a non-negligible influence on the result. Communication of the Results to the Pilot Laboratory Each participating laboratory will submit one printed and signed calibration report for each angular accelerometer to the executive secretary of CCAUV including the following: a description of the calibration systems used for the comparison and the mounting techniques for the angular accelerometer a description of the calibration methods used documented record of the ambient conditions during measurements the calibration results, including the relative expanded measurement uncertainty, and the applied coverage factor for each value a detailed uncertainty budget for the system covering all components of measurement uncertainty (calculated according to GUM, [4]), including among others information on the type of uncertainty (A or B), assumed distribution function and repeatability component. In addition each participating laboratory will receive electronic spreadsheets prepared by the pilot laboratory, where the calibration results have to be filled in following the structure given in the files. The use of the electronic spreadsheets for reporting is mandatory. The consistency between the results in electronic form and the printed and signed calibration report is the responsibility of the participating laboratory. The data submitted in the electronic spreadsheet shall be deemed the official results submitted for the comparison. The results have to be submitted to the executive secretary of CCAUV within six weeks after the measurements. The pilot laboratory will submit the set of results to the executive secretary of CCAUV in advance to the first measurement of a participating laboratory. The executive secretary of CCAUV will collect all the results from participants and deliver all the collected results to the Page 4 of 5

pilot laboratory for the post processing. Remarks on the Post Processing Since it was generally agreed that the chosen angular accelerometers would not be the optimal choice as best device under test (DUT) for the low frequencies, an additional uncertainty component, attributed to the DUT, will be added to the measurement uncertainties for those frequencies prior to the evaluation of comparison results. This is supposed to cover the influence of the possible electrostrictive or tribo-electric effect of cable motion, etc. This processing will be performed by the pilot laboratory during data analysis. This component is not to be included in the participant's uncertainty budget. Presuming consistency of the results, the bilateral comparison reference value and the degrees of equivalence will be calculated according to the established methods as a weighted mean as agreed upon already for CCAUV.V-K1. In case of damage or loss of any of the artefacts, the bilateral comparison will be evaluated as far in the schedule as possible, all further action concerning continuation will be decided in coordination with the participants. References [1] ISO 16063-1:1998 Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers -- Part 1: Basic concepts [2] ISO 16063-15:2006 Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers -- Part 11: Primary vibration calibration by laser interferometry [3] ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories [4] ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement -- Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995) Acknowledgement The KRISS working standard (Bruel & Kjær type 4381-ROT, one of two artefacts) was kindly supplied by Bruel & Kjær. Page 5 of 5