Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Similar documents
Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Nov Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Job No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B. Made by IR Date Oct Checked by FH/NB Date Oct Revised by MEB Date April 2006

C6 Advanced design of steel structures

APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design


Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

Basis of Design, a case study building

Design of Compression Members

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

Steel Frame Design Manual

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

LATERALLY RESTRAINED BEAMS

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship

9-3. Structural response

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Serviceability Deflection calculation

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.

Mechanics of Materials Primer

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Lateral Torsional Buckling (sections class 1-3) - Column Item COx

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

8 Deflectionmax. = 5WL 3 384EI

PES Institute of Technology

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

Prof. Dr. Zahid Ahmad Siddiqi BEAM COLUMNS

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Longitudinal strength standard

DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS - II

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

9.5 Compression Members

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Basic principles of steel structures. Dr. Xianzhong ZHAO

7 TRANSVERSE SHEAR transverse shear stress longitudinal shear stresses

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

2. Determine the deflection at C of the beam given in fig below. Use principal of virtual work. W L/2 B A L C

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

14. *14.8 CASTIGLIANO S THEOREM

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

Chapter 12 Elastic Stability of Columns

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

March 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Mechanics of Structure

to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

Transcription:

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION FLANGE Design a staircase support beam. The beam is a single section channel, simpl supported between columns. The flight of stairs lands between A and C and provides restraint to the top flange of this part of the beam. The top flange is unrestrained between B and C. The overall span of the beam is taken as 4, m. 1,5 m w 1,5 m 1, m Beam, m Down A C R A 1,5 m,7 m restrained unrestrained R B B Actions Assuming the beam carries the load from the first run of stairs to the landing onl: Permanent actions (G): Load on stairs 1,0 kn/m (1,0, ), kn/m Self weight of beam 0,1 kn/m Variable actions (Q): Load on stairs 4 kn/m (4,0,) 8,8 kn/m Load case to be considered (ultimate limit state): γ G, j G k, j + γ Q,1 Q k,1 + γ Q,i ψ 0, i Q k,i j 1 i>1 As there is onl one variable action (Q k,1 ) the last term in the above expression does not need to be considered in this example. γ G, j 1,5 (unfavourable effects) γ Q,1 1,5 Factored actions: Permanent action: Load on stairs 1,5,,97 kn/m Self weight of beam 1,5 0,1 0,17 kn/m Variable action Load on stairs 1,5 8,8 1, kn/m Eqn.. Section.. Structural analsis Reactions at support points R A + R B (,97 + 1,) 1,5 + 0,17 4, 4,97 kn 11

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 Taking moments about A 1,5 1,17 0,75 + 0,17 4, (4,/ ) R B 4,9 kn 4, R A 4,97 4,9 0,8 kn Maximum bending moment occurs at a distance 1,5 1,5 1 1, m from A 4, M max 1, 0,8 1, 1,17 1, 0,17 1,58 knm Maximum shear occurs at A F Sd 0,8 kn Material properties Use material grade 1.4401 0,% proof stress 0 N/mm Table.1 Take f as the 0,% proof stress 0 N/mm Section..4 E 00 000 N/mm and G 7 900 N/mm Section..4 Tr a 00 75 channel section, thickness 5 mm Cross section properties I 9,45 mm 4 W el, 94,5 mm I z 0,850 mm 4 W pl, 11,9 mm I w 5085 mm 4 A g 150 mm I t 1,7 4 mm 4 Classification of the cross-section ε 1,01 Table 4. Assume conservativel that c h t 00 190 mm for web Web subject to bending: c 190 8 Table 4. t 5 For Class 1, c t 5ε, therefore web is Class 1 Outstand flange subject to compression: c 75 15 Table 4. t 5 1

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 For Class, c t 11,9ε 1,0, therefore outstand flange is Class 4 Therefore, overall classification of cross-section is Class 4 Calculation of effective section properties Calculate reduction factor ρ for cold formed outstand elements 1 0,1 ρ but 1 Eq. 4.1b λ p λ p b / t λ p where b c 75mm Eq. 4. 8,4ε k σ Assuming uniform stress distribution within the, σ ψ 1 σ 1 Table 4.4 k σ 0,4 Table 4.4 75/ 5 λ p 0,797 8,4 1,01 0,4 ρ 1 0,797 0,1 0,797 0,891 c eff 0,891 75,8 mm Table 4.4 A eff A ( 1 ρ) ct 150 1 0,891 75 9 mm g ( ) 5 Calculate shift of neutral axis of section under bending Non-effective zone - Centroidal axis of gross cross-section Centroidal axis of effective cross-section A g h 97,5 mm t ( 1 ρ ) c t h ( ) A eff 00 5 150 1 0,891 75 5 00 9 1

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 4 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 Shift of neutral axis position, h 00 97,5, 47 mm Calculate I eff, I eff, I eff, I ( 1 ρ ) 1 ct ( 1 ρ) h t ct A eff 9,45 9,47 9,0 mm 4 I W eff, h + eff, - ( 1 0,891) 75 5 1 9,0 88,4 mm 00 +,47 ( 1 0,891) 75 5 ( 0,5) Shear lag Section 4.4. Shear lag ma be neglected provided that b 0 L e /50 for outstand elements L e distance between points of zero moment 400 mm L e /50 84 mm, b 0 75 mm, therefore shear lag can be neglected Flange curling Section 4.4. u 4 σ b pren 199- a s 1-:004 E t z Clause 5.4() Eq. 5.a σ a average longitudinal stress in flange 0 N/mm (maximum possible value) b s (75 5) 70 mm z (0,5) 97,5 mm u 0 70 00000 5 97,5 4 0,04 mm Flange curling can be neglected if u < 0,05 00 mm Therefore flange curling is negligible pren 199-1-:004 Clause 5.4(1) Partial safet factors The following partial safet factors are used throughout the design example: γ M0 1,1 and γ M1 1,1 Table.1 14

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 5 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 Moment resistance of cross-section Section 4.7.4 For a class 4 cross section M c,rd Weff, min f γ M 0 Eq. 4.9 M c,rd 88,4 0 17,7 knm 1,1 Design moment 1,58 knm, cross-section moment resistance is OK Cross-section resistance to shear Section 4.7.5 V pl,rd v( f ) γ M0 A Eq. 4.0 A v h t 00 5 00 mm V Rd 00 0 115,5 kn 1,1 00 Design shear force 0,8 kn, therefore shear resistance of cross-section is OK Check that shear resistance is not limited b shear buckling Assume that h w h t 00 190 mm h w 190 5 ε 8, shear buckling resistance needs to be checked if 4,ε t 5 t η Section 5.4. Shear resistance is not limited b shear buckling. Resistance to lateral torsional buckling Section 5.4. Compression flange of beam is laterall unrestrained between B and C. Check this portion of beam for lateral torsional buckling. M b,rd χ W f γ for a Class 4 cross-section Eq. 5.8 LT eff, W eff, 88.4 mm χ LT ϕ LT 1 M1 1 0,5 [ ϕlt LT ] ( 1 α λ 0, + ) + λ ϕ LT,5 ( ) λ LT LT LT 4 LT 15 Eq. 5.9 0 + λ Eq. 5. W f M cr Determine the elastic critical moment (M cr ) M cr 1/ π EI z k + ( ) z I w C1 g j g j kzl kw Iz π EIz ( kzl) GIt + ( C z C z ) ( C z C z ) Eq. 5.11 Appendix B Section B.1

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 C is simpl supported, while B approaches full fixit. Assume most conservative case: k z k w 1,0. C 1, C and C are determined from consideration of bending moment diagram and end conditions. From bending moment diagram, ψ 0 C 1 1,77, C 0 and C 1,00 Table B.1 z j 0 for a cross-section with equal flanges M M cr cr π 00000 0,850 1,77 1,00 1,00 41,9 knm 88,4 λ LT ( 1,00 700) 5085 0,850 41,9 0 + ( 1,00 700) 0,8 7900 1,7 π 00000 0,850 4 0,5 Eq. 5.11 Using imperfection factor α LT 0,4 for cold formed sections Section 5.4. ( 0,8 ) ϕ,5 1 0,4( 0,8 0,4) χ LT 0 + + 0,779 0,779 + 1 [ 0,779 0,8 ] 0, 5 0,8 M b,rd 0,8 88.4 0 - / 1,1 15, knm From bending moment diagram, maximum moment in unrestrained portion of beam 1,0 knm Thus member has adequate resistance to lateral torsional buckling. Deflection Section 5.4. Load case (serviceabilit limit state): G + Q + ψ Q Eq..8 k, j k,1 j 1 i 1 As there is onl one variable action (Q k,1 ) the last term in the above expression does not need to be considered in this example. Secant modulus is used for deflection calculations - thus it is necessar to find the maximum stress due to unfactored permanent and variable actions. 0, i k, i 1

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 7 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 E The secant modulus E S S1 + E S, Where E Es, i and i 1, n E σ i, Ed, ser 1+ 0,00 σ i Ed ser f,, From structural analsis calculations the following were found: Maximum moment due to permanent actions Maximum moment due to imposed actions Total moment due to unfactored actions 1,90 knm,8 knm 8,58 knm Section is Class 4, therefore W eff is used in the calculations for maximum stress in the member. 17 Appendix C Assume, conservativel that the stress in the tension and are approximatel equal, i.e. E S1 E S. The following constants are used to determine the secant moduli: For grade 1.4401 stainless steel, n (longitudinal direction) 7,0 Table C.1 M max 8,58 Serviceabilit design stress, σ i, Ed, ser 97, 1 N/mm W 88,4 eff, 00000 E s, i 197 48 N/mm 7 00000 97,1 1+ 0,00 97,1 0 Maximum deflection due to patch loading occurs at a distance of approximatel 1,9 m from support A. Deflection at a distance x from support A due to patch load extending a distance a from support A is given b the following formulae: 4 wal When x a δ n [ m m + m(4 + n ) n ] 4aE I S Where m x/l and n a/l When x 1,9 m, and a 1,5 m: m 1,9/4, 0,45, n 1,5/4, 0,57 Patch load (permanent+variable unfactored actions) w 11,0 kn/m Uniform load (permanent action) w 0,18 kn/m Deflection due to patch loads at a distance of 1,9 m from support A, δ 1 100 1,5 400 δ 1 4 1500 19748 9,0 0,57 7,09 mm 4 [ 0,45 0,45 + 0,45( 4 + 0,57 ) 0,57 ] Steel Designer s Manual (5 th Ed)

Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 8 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 Deflection at midspan due to self weight of beam, δ 5 ( w L) L 5 (0,18 4,) 400 δ 84 E I 84 19748 9,0 S Total deflection δ + δ 7,09 + 0,9 7,8 mm span 400 δ limiting 1, 8 mm 50 50 Therefore deflection is acceptabl small. 0,9 mm 18