Lecture 33. Aerosol Lidar (2)

Similar documents
Lecture 28. Aerosol Lidar (4) HSRL for Aerosol Measurements

Lecture 18. Temperature Lidar (7) Rayleigh Doppler Technique

Lecture 10. Lidar Classification and Envelope Estimation

Lecture 21. Constituent Lidar (3)

Lecture 11. Classification of Lidar by Topics

Lecture 26. Wind Lidar (4) Direct Detection Doppler Lidar

Lecture 06. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (4) Physical Processes in Lidar

Lidar and Atmospheric Aerosol Particles

Lecture 12. Temperature Lidar (1) Overview and Physical Principles

Lecture 31. Constituent Lidar (3)

Lecture 15. Temperature Lidar (4) Doppler Techniques

Lecture 05. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (3)

Lecture 20. Wind Lidar (2) Vector Wind Determination

Lecture 17. Temperature Lidar (6) Integration Technique

Lecture 13. Temperature Lidar (2) Resonance Fluorescence Doppler Tech

Lecture 16. Temperature Lidar (5) Resonance Doppler Techniques

Lecture 20. Wind Lidar (1) Overview Wind Technologies

Lecture 14. Principles of active remote sensing: Lidars. Lidar sensing of gases, aerosols, and clouds.

Lecture 32. Aerosol & Cloud Lidar (1) Overview & Polar Mesospheric Clouds

Lecture 06. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (4) Physical Processes in Lidar

Lecture 07. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (5) Physical Processes in Lidar

1 Fundamentals of Lidar

Lecture 12. Temperature Lidar (2) Resonance Fluorescence Doppler Lidar

Lecture 23. Wind Lidar Overview & Direct Motion Detection

Lecture 11: Doppler wind lidar

Lecture 32. Lidar Error and Sensitivity Analysis

Richard Miles and Arthur Dogariu. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA

Spaceborne Aerosol and Ozone Lidars for Air Quality Applications

Temperature Measurements with Lidar

NTUA. A. Georgakopoulou. A. Papayannis1, A. Aravantinos2 NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTIDUTION OF ATHENS SIENA

Lecture 10. Lidar Effective Cross-Section vs. Convolution

Design of a High Spectral Resolution Lidar for Atmospheric Monitoring in EAS Detection Experiments

The Design and Construction of an Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar.

Exploring the Atmosphere with Lidars

Principles of active remote sensing: Lidars and lidar sensing of aerosols, gases and clouds.

Lecture 08. Solutions of Lidar Equations

Radiation in the atmosphere

A new lidar for water vapor and temperature measurements in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer

Lesson 11. The information lost, continuation. Monday, December 3, 12

CHEM*3440. Photon Energy Units. Spectrum of Electromagnetic Radiation. Chemical Instrumentation. Spectroscopic Experimental Concept.

Characterization of free-tropospheric aerosol layers from different source regions

NTUA. Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens. June IPRD10,, Siena, Italy S. Maltezos SIENA ITALY

Outline. December 14, Applications Scattering. Chemical components. Forward model Radiometry Data retrieval. Applications in remote sensing

What are Aerosols? Suspension of very small solid particles or liquid droplets Radii typically in the range of 10nm to

Lecture 27. Lidar Data Inversion (1)

Deriving aerosol scattering ratio using range-resolved lidar ratio

Remote Sensing Systems Overview

Sl-2 High Spectral Resolution Lidar at 532nm for Simultaneous Measurement of Atmospheric State and Aerosol Profiles using Iodine Vapor Filters

On atmospheric lidar performance comparison: from power aperture product to power aperture mixing ratio scattering cross-section product

Atmospheric Lidar The Atmospheric Lidar (ATLID) is a high-spectral resolution lidar and will be the first of its type to be flown in space.

2.3 Fundamentals of Lidar (Fabio Madonna)

Lecture 29. Lidar Data Inversion (2)

STATISTICS OF OPTICAL AND GEOMETRICAL PROPERTIES OF CIRRUS CLOUD OVER TIBETAN PLATEAU MEASURED BY LIDAR AND RADIOSONDE

Science 1206 Unit 2: Weather Dynamics Worksheet 8: Layers of the Atmosphere

4.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS USING OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING

Lecture 45. Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF) Lidar, White-Light Lidar, and Frequency Comb Lidar

Monitoring of Eyjafjallajökull Ash Layer Evolution over Payerne Switzerland with a Raman Lidar

Chap.1. Introduction to Optical Remote Sensing

Optical Remote Sensing Techniques Characterize the Properties of Atmospheric Aerosols

5.5 (AIR PRESSURE) WEATHER

Atmospheric Monitoring

Exploring the Atmosphere with Lidars

NICT Lidar Systems at Poker Flat Research Range

Advanced Spectroscopy Laboratory

Nonlinear Effects in Optical Fiber. Dr. Mohammad Faisal Assistant Professor Dept. of EEE, BUET

Preliminary testing of new approaches to retrieve aerosol properties from joint photometer-lidar inversion

Why is the sky blue?

Common Elements: Nitrogen, 78%

Fabry-Perot Measurement of Aeronomic Winds and Temperatures

Satellite remote sensing of aerosols & clouds: An introduction

7. Aerosols and Climate

Remote Measurement of Tropospheric NO 2 by a Dual MAX-DOAS over Guangzhou During the 2008 PRD Campaign

E-PROFILE: Glossary of lidar and ceilometer variables. compiled by: I. Mattis and F. Wagner

Low Arabian dust extinction-to-backscatter ratio

Basic Design of UV Rotational Raman Lidar for Temperature Measurement of the Troposphere

Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Particles Using LIDAR, Calipso Satellite, & AERONET: Algorithm Development

MIPAS WATER VAPOUR MIXING RATIO AND TEMPERATURE VALIDATION BY RAMAN-MIE-RAYLEIGH LIDAR

Lecture 30. Lidar Error and Sensitivity Analysis

Application of IR Raman Spectroscopy

Lecture 10. Lidar Simulation and Error Analysis Overview (2)

Polar Mesospheric Clouds and Cosmic Dust: Three years of SOFIE Measurements

Calibration processors for AEOLUS. A. Dabas

Supplement of Vertical profiles of aerosol mass concentration derived by unmanned airborne in situ and remote sensing instruments during dust events

UKCA_RADAER Aerosol-radiation interactions

The EarthCARE mission: An active view on aerosols, clouds and radiation

Saharan dust over a central European EARLINET-AERONET site: Combined observations with Raman lidar and Sun photometer

Study of the Influence of Thin Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Radiances Using Raman Lidar and GOES Data

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS S

Absorption and scattering

Lecture 30. Further Consideration on Lidar Data Inversion

Advanced characterization of aerosol properties through the combination of active/ passive ground-based remote sensing (and in situ measurements)

Chapter 4 Nadir looking UV measurement. Part-I: Theory and algorithm

REMOTE SENSING OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL PROPERTIES

Today s AZ Daily Star has 2 interesting articles: one on our solar future & the other on an issue re: our state-mandated energy-efficiency plan

Atmospheric Radiation

Neutral Winds in the Upper Atmosphere. Qian Wu National Center for Atmospheric Research

Fabry-Perot Interferometer for atmospheric monitoring useful for EAS detection E.Fokitis 1, K. Patrinos 1, Z. Nikitaki 1

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE. Tarbuck Lutgens

REMOTE SENSING OF ATMOSPHERIC TRACE GASES BY OPTICAL CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY AND LIDAR

Transcription:

Lecture 33. Aerosol Lidar (2) Elastic Scattering, Raman, HSRL q Elastic-scattering lidar for aerosol detection q Single-channel vs multi-channel aerosol lidars q Measurement of aerosol extinction from multichannel lidar (Raman lidar and HSRL) q High Spectral Resolution Lidar for aerosol detection q University of Wisconsin HSRL example q Comparison of aerosol lidar technique q Summary 1

Co-axial Lidar Elastic-Scattering Lidar for Aerosols Strong Mie Scattering above Rayleigh Bkg 2

Elastic-Scattering for Lower Atmos q Lidar equation for elastic backscatter by air molecules and aerosols P(R) = E oη ' O(R)β(R)exp 2 2 R () α(r)dr β(r) = β aer (R) + β mol (R) α(r) = α aer (R) +α mol (R) R 0 * +, O(R) - overlap between laser and FOV β(r) - backscatter coefficient (km -1 sr -1 ) α(r) - extinction coefficient (km -1 ) q Backscatter and extinction are contributed by aerosols and molecules Index aer refer to aerosol particles Index mol refer to air molecules q Combining above equations, we obtain S(R) = P(R)R 2 ' R * = E 0 η L [ β aer (R) + β mol (R)]exp 2 [ α aer (r) +α mol (r)]dr () o +, Note: backscatter is local effect while extinction is integrated effect q Recall the Rayleigh scattering from air molecules β mol (R) can be determined from atmosphere temperature and pressure β mol (λ,z R ) = 2.938 10 32 P(z R ) T(z R ) 1 λ 4.0117 z R is altitude for range R 3

Elastic-Scattering Cont d q Ignore the molecular absorption, then the extinction by air molecules is the integration of molecular angular scattering coefficient through the entire 4π solid angles. Rayleigh scattering is anisotropic β (θ ) = β T 4π P(θ ) = β T 4π 0.7629 (1+ 0.9324cos2 θ ) α mol (R) = β T = 8π 3 β(r,π) q Define molecule extinction-to-backscatter ratio (lidar ratio) as L mol = α mol (R) β mol (R) = 8π 3 sr The lidar ratio for molecule is range independent q Thus, among the four parameters β mol (R), β aer (R), α mol (R), α aer (R), two are known, and the other two β aer (R) and α aer (R) are unknown. q Define the lidar ratio for aerosols (extinction-to-backscatter ratio) L aer (R) = α aer (R) β aer (R) q Define a variable Y(R) as Y(R) = L aer (R)[ β aer (R) + β mol (R)] 4

Derive Aerosol Backscatter and Extinction in Lower Atmosphere q Substitute lidar ratios and Y(R) into the lidar equation for S(R), % S(R)L aer (R)exp& 2 ' R o ( [ L aer (r) L mol ]β mol (r)dr) * = E, R / 0η L Y(R)exp 2 Y(r)dr -. 0 01 q Taking the logarithms of both sides of above equation and differentiating them with respect to R, we obtain + % R (. d ln- S(R)L aer (R)exp& 2, ' [ L aer (r) L mol ]β mol (r)dr) 0 o */ dr = 1 Y(R) dy(r) dr 2Y(R) q This is a Bernoulli equation, and can be solved for the following boundary condition Y(R 0 ) = L aer (R 0 )[ β aer (R 0 ) + β mol (R 0 )] 5

Klett Method & Fernald Method q By solving the Bernoulli equation, we obtain the backscatter coefficient β aer (R) + β mol (R) = % R ( S(R)exp& 2 [ L aer (r) L mol ]β mol (r)dr) ' R 0 * S(R 0 ) β aer (R 0 ) + β mol (R 0 ) 2 R L aer(r)s(r)t(r,r 0 )dr R 0 where & r ) T(r,R 0 ) = exp' 2 [ L aer ( r #) L mol ]β mol ( r #)d r #* ( R 0 + q The aerosol extinction coefficient can be estimated by α aer (R) = L aer (R)β aer (R) q The solution for the Bernoulli equation can be integrated by starting from reference range R 0, which may be either the near end (R > R 0, forward integration), or the remote end (R < R 0, backward integration). q Numerical stability is only given by the backward integration, which is called Klett method [1981]. [Ansmann and Muller, Lidar and atmospheric aerosol particles, 2005] 6

How Reliable is Single-Channel Lidar? q The above method is basically using one lidar equation to determine two unknown parameters. Its accuracy critically relies on the input parameter L aer (R) - lidar ratio for aerosol. q However, this quantity depends on the microphysical, chemical and morphological properties of the particles, and varies strongly with height, especially when marine, anthropogenic (urban, biomass burning), and desert dust particles or mixtures of these are present in layers above each other. Even in the well-mixed layer, the lidar ratio is not constant with height because relative humidity increases with height. Marine particles Saharan dust Aerosol type Less absorbing urban particles Absorbing particles from biomass burning Lidar ratio 20-35 sr 50-80 sr 35-70 sr 70-100 sr q Variations between 20-100 sr make it practically impossible to estimate trustworthy extinction profiles from single-channel data in lower atmos. 7

How Reliable is Single-Channel Lidar? q The major difficulty of finding a proper lidar ratio (the extinction-tobackscatter ratio) arises from the facts that aerosol extinction of light heavily depends on aerosol s absorption of light, not just scattering. For absorption, the chemical composition of aerosols strongly affects the results. Even for pure aerosol scattering, it also varies with the shape, size, and refraction index of aerosols. q This is why aerosol s lidar ratio varies so much. How much absorbing black carbon is contained in aerosols strongly affect the extinction. Aerosol type Marine particles Saharan dust Less absorbing urban particles Absorbing particles from biomass burning Lidar ratio 20-35 sr 50-80 sr 35-70 sr 70-100 sr q Variations between 20-100 sr make it practically impossible to estimate trustworthy extinction profiles from single-channel data in lower atmos. 8

Multi-Channel Lidar for Aerosols q To infer aerosol extinction more trustworthy, the key is to add additional channels to provide addition information. At least, two channels of lidar profiles are needed. Raman lidar and HSRL are two major solutions to this problem. q One method is the measurement of two lidar profiles in one of which the aerosol scattering is zero β aer = 0. This is the case in Raman lidar. Only molecules, not aerosols, contribute to the inelastic Raman backscatter profile produced by molecular nitrogen or oxygen. (1) The elastic lidar return is affected by both aerosol extinction α aer and aerosol backscatter β aer. (2) Raman lidar return is affected by aerosol extinction α aer alone, as aerosol scattering β aer is at a different wavelength than the Raman return wavelength, so won t be received by the Raman channel. q Another method is the high-spectral-resolution lidar (HSRL) that has two channels - one to measure pure molecular scattering, and another to measure the combination of aerosol and molecular scattering. 9

q Raman lidar measures LIDAR REMOTE SENSING PROF. XINZHAO CHU CU-BOULDER, SPRING 2016 Raman Lidar and HSRL (1) elastic scattering from aerosols & molecules, (2) inelastic (Raman) scattering by N 2 or O 2 molecules. For example, if 532 nm laser is Raman shifted by N 2, the V-R Raman signal is at 607 nm. Aerosol Scattering Molecular Scattering q High-Spectral-Resolution-Lidar (HSRL) is to measure the molecule scattering separately from the aerosol scattering, utilizing the different spectral distribution of the Rayleigh and Mie scattering. 10

Derive Extinction from Raman/HSRL q For the pure Rayleigh channel in HSRL or the Raman channel P(R,λ Ra ) = E oη λra ( R + R 2 O(R,λ Ra )β Ra (R,λ 0 )exp) [ α(r,λ 0 ) +α(r,λ Ra )]dr, * 0 - On the way up On the way down where P is the power of return signal from Rayleigh or Raman scattering, R is range and λ 0 is the outgoing laser wavelength, λ Ra is the wavelength of Rayleigh or Raman scattering, E 0 is the transmitted laser pulse energy, η λra is the lidar optical and detection efficiency at wavelength λ Ra, O is the overlapping function between laser and receiver FOV, β Ra is the backscatter coefficient of Rayleigh or Raman scattering, α(λ 0 ) is the extinction on the way up to the backscatter region, α(λ Ra ) is the extinction on the way back to the lidar. For HSRL, λ 0 = λ Ra (elastic); For Raman, λ 0 λ Ra (inelastic) 11

Derive Extinction from Raman/HSRL q The backscatter coefficient of Rayleigh or Raman scattering from air molecules can be calculated as β Ra (R,λ 0 ) = N Ra (R) dσ Ra dω (π,λ 0 ) where N Ra is the number density of air molecules for Rayleigh scattering or the number density of N 2 or O 2 for Raman scattering. dσ Ra dω(π,λ 0 ) is the molecular differential cross section for the Rayleigh or Raman scattering process at the laser wavelength q From above two equations, we have α(r,λ 0 ) +α(r,λ Ra ) = d dr ln N Ra(R) S(R,λ Ra ) + d dr lno(r,λ Ra ) where S(R,λ Ra ) is the range-corrected molecular signal: S(R,λ Ra ) = P(R,λ Ra )R 2 q In the optimum case O(R) 1, i.e., good overlap α aer (R,λ 0 ) +α aer (R,λ Ra ) = d dr ln N Ra(R) S(R,λ Ra ) α mol (R,λ 0 ) α mol (R,λ Ra ) 12

Derive Extinction from Raman/HSRL q To obtain the extinction coefficient at the transmitted wavelength λ 0, we have to introduce the Angstrom exponent å(r), which describes the wavelength dependence of the particle extinction coefficient. α aer (λ 0 ) α aer (λ Ra ) = $ λ Ra & % λ 0 ' a(r) ) ( q Thus, the final solution of aerosol extinction is given by α aer (R,λ 0 ) = d dr ln N Ra(R) S(R,λ Ra ) α mol (R,λ 0 ) α mol (R,λ Ra ) % 1+ λ 0 ' & q For HSRL, the denominator of the above equation is 2, because λ 0 = λ Ra q Angstrom exponent å(r) ranges from 0-1.45 for 350-800 nm. Overestimation and underestimation of the å value by 0.5 leads to relative errors on the order of 5%. 13 λ Ra ( * ) a(r)

Derive Backscatter from Raman/HSRL q Aerosol backscatter coefficient can be calculated from the ratio of the total backscatter signal (aerosol + molecule) to the molecular backscatter signal as below. β aer (R,λ 0 ) + β mol (R,λ 0 ) = [ β aer (R 0,λ 0 ) + β mol (R 0,λ 0 )] P(R 0,λ Ra )P(R,λ 0 ) P(R 0,λ 0 )P(R,λ Ra ) q The aerosol lidar ratio is then given by ( R + exp) [ α aer (r,λ Ra ) +α mol (r,λ Ra )]dr, * R 0 - ( R + exp) [ α aer (r,λ 0 ) +α mol (r,λ 0 )]dr, * R 0 - L aer (R,λ 0 ) = α aer (R,λ 0 ) β aer (R,λ 0 ) N Ra (R) N Ra (R 0 ) Here, R 0 is a reference point, which is usually chosen in upper troposphere or lower stratosphere so that it is free of aerosols and the molecular backscatter coefficient can be reliably estimated from atmos conditions. 14

Properties of Aerosols in Atmosphere 15

Comparison of Single & Multi-Channel Lidar q Single-channel elastic scattering lidar: Klett method in deriving aerosol extinction, i.e., assuming the lidar ratio for aerosol (extinction coefficient to backscatter coefficient ratio). This is an unreliable method as this ratio can vary from 20 to 100 sr. L aer (R) = α aer (R) β aer (R) q Multi-channel elastic (HSRL) or inelastic (Raman) lidar: providing more spectral information to derive aerosol characteristics more precisely. In this method, the Angstrom exponent that describes the wavelength dependence of the aerosol extinction coefficient has to be assumed. However, the aerosol results are insensitive to the Angstrom component value (unlike the lidar ratio). a(r) α aer (λ 0 ) α aer (λ Ra ) = $ λ Ra & % λ 0 ' ) ( 16

High Spectral Resolution Lidar with Scanning Fabry-Perot Interferometer q The idea is to use a frequency-stabilized laser and a scanning Fabry- Perot interferometer to infer the combined particulate and molecular spectrum. This technique was pioneered by Fiocco et al. [1971]. q The broadband molecular component of the measured spectrum can be fitted to predictions of a model molecular spectrum. The backscatter ratio can then be determined from the atmospheric density at the measurement altitude and the ratio of the areas under aerosol and molecular scattering curves. q Disadvantages of scanning FPI (according to Dr. Edwin E. Eloranta) (1) FPI filter is narrow so rejects most of the molecular scattering signals ð low system efficiency and long measurement time. (2) Spectral components are measured sequentially, allowing temporal variations of the atmospheric conditions to distort the spectrum. 17

HSRL with Fixed Fabry-Perot Etalon q System efficiency can be improved with non-scanning FPI. The FPI (etalon) is locked to the laser wavelength. Two detectors are employed: one for signal passing the FPI, and another for signal reflected from the FPI. q Most of the aerosol scattering passes through the etalon transmission band with only a small fraction reflected. The Doppler-broadened molecular scattering is reflected outside the etalon transmission band and divided more equally between two channels. q If the spectral transmission and reflection characteristics of the etalon are known, a model of the molecular spectrum can be used with an independently supplied atmospheric temperature profile to predict the transmission of the two channels for both aerosol and molecular signals. ð for separating aerosol from molecular signals to derive aerosol information more precisely. 18

Fixed FPI Advantages and Disadvantages q Advantages: (1) Errors due to temporal variations in the scattering media are suppressed because both signals are measured simultaneously. (2) System efficiency is improved because the filter bandwidths are larger and both transmitted and reflected signals are detected. (3) The etalon can be tuned to any wavelength from UV to visible to IR. q Disadvantages: (1) The high-resolution etalons are sensitive to thermal and mechanical perturbations. (2) At a given spectral resolution, the product of the etalon diameter and the angular acceptance of an etalon is limited. As a result, large telescopes require large and expensive etalons. 19

HSRL with Atomic and Molecular Absorption (Blocking) Filter Atomic or molecular absorption block the aerosol scattering 20

Atomic and Molecular Absorption Filter: Advantages and Disadvantages q Advantages: (1) The atomic/molecular vapor version HSRL replace the temperaturesensitive and mechanical-sensitive Fabry-Perot etalon with a robust and stable atomic/molecular absorption filter. (2) It also provides much larger acceptance angle, overcoming the FPI limitation. q Disadvantages: (1) The atomic/molecular absorption filters only work at certain wavelengths, limiting the application of available lasers. (2) The Ba vapor cell needs high operating temperature. q Now (I 2 ) iodine-vapor-cell-based HSRL has become robust and suitable for long-term deployment. q Other atomic vapor cell like Na, K, Ba can also work for particular wavelengths and situations. 21

University of Wisconsin HSRL on HIAPER Courtesy of Dr. Edwin E. Eloranta, University of Wisconsin 22

Fiber Pinhole Interferometer (PHI) to measure relative frequency offset For the same optical path difference (OPD) setup, the spatial position of interference pattern will change with the incident laser frequency, so providing a measurement of relative frequency shift. 24 th ILRC proceeding [Razenkov et al., ILRC, 2008] 23

Laser Freq Locking with Brillouin Scattering -31.6 GHZ offset by Brillouin backscattering from a silica fiber 24 th ILRC proceeding [Razenkov et al., ILRC, 2008] 24

LIDAR REMOTE SENSING PROF. XINZHAO CHU CU-BOULDER, SPRING 2016 HSRL Measurement Results A book chapter High Spectral Resolution Lidar by Dr. Edwin E. Eloranta University of Wisconsin 25

Challenging Questions q How about if we have multiple wavelengths of elastic scattering lidar channels, e.g., 1064, 532 and 355 nm simultaneously? Can we derive the aerosols extinction and backscatter coefficient better than single elastic scattering channel? S(R, λ 1 ) = P(R, λ 1 )R 2 # R & = E 0 η L [ β aer (R, λ 1 )+ β mol (R, λ 1 )]exp 2 [ α aer (r, λ 1 )+α mol (r, λ 1 ) $% ]dr o '( S(R, λ 2 ) = P(R, λ 2 )R 2 # R & = E 0 η L [ β aer (R, λ 2 )+ β mol (R, λ 2 )]exp 2 [ α aer (r, λ 2 )+α mol (r, λ 2 ) $% ]dr o '( S(R, λ 3 ) = P(R, λ 3 )R 2 # R & = E 0 η L [ β aer (R, λ 3 )+ β mol (R, λ 3 )]exp 2 [ α aer (r, λ 3 )+α mol (r, λ 3 ) $% ]dr o '( α aer2! = λ 1 # α aer1 " λ 2 $ & % a β aer2! = λ 1 # β aer1 " λ 2 $ & % b References: Our textbook Chapter 3 on aerosol lidars; two short book chapters at our class website: AerosolLidarChap.pdf and HSRL.pdf 26

Altitude (km) 120 100 80 60 40 20 LIDAR REMOTE SENSING PROF. XINZHAO CHU CU-BOULDER, SPRING 2016 Aerosol Lidar Technique Comparison PMC PSC Aerosols Clouds Stratopause Mesopause Tropopause 0 150 200 250 300 350 Temperature (K) Thermosphere Airglow & Meteoric Layers OH, O, Na, Fe, K, Ca Ozone Mesosphere Stratosphere Troposphere q Aerosols in mesosphere (Mesospheric Clouds ~ 85 km): Rayleigh/Mie lidar, resonance fluorescence lidar (detuned) q Aerosols in upper stratosphere (Polar Stratospheric Clouds 20-30 km): Rayleigh/Mie lidar, resonance fluorescence lidar q Aerosols in lower stratosphere and troposphere: Rayleigh/Mie elastic-scattering lidar, Raman scattering lidar, High-Spectral- Resolution Lidar (HSRL) q In all altitude range, polarization & multi-wavelength detections help reveal aerosol microphysical properties 27

Summary q Aerosol is an important topic in atmospheric science and environmental research. It can be measured/monitored by hot lidar technologies. q Single-channel elastic-scattering lidar can beautifully detect PMC and PSC backscatter, and monitor the occurrence, height, vertical structure, etc. However, it is unreliable to derive aerosol extinction. q Multi-channel lidars like Raman lidar and HSRL provide addition information by adding Raman channel or separating molecular scattering from aerosol scattering. Both can measure aerosol backscatter and extinction nicely. HSRL is more desirable when longer range detection is needed as Rayleigh scattering is much stronger than Raman scattering. q Precise aerosol measurements require good spectrum measurements to distinguish aerosol from molecular signals. High spectral resolution lidar, especially the ones based on iodine or atomic absorption filters, promises very bright future. q Multi-wavelength and polarization detection can help identify aerosol shape, size, distribution, and number density. q Aerosol study is growing, and awaiting for more smart lidar ideas. 28