Keywords: ASTER, SRTM, Digital Elevation Model, GPS-Levelling data, Validation.

Similar documents
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF ASTER GLOBAL DEM OVER TURKEY

Positional accuracy of the drainage networks extracted from ASTER and SRTM for the Gorongosa National Park region - Comparative analysis

COMPARISON OF SRTM AND 25K TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS IN TURKEY

Geographic Information Systems class # 1 February 19, Coordinate reference systems in GIS: geodetic coordinates

GIS and Remote Sensing

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 1, No 4, 2011

A Study On The Usabılıty Of Dıgıtal Elevatıon Models Obtaıned From Open Sources In The Productıon Of Contours: Comparıson Of Alos And Srtm Dem Data

SPOT DEM Product Description

Comparison in terms of accuracy of DEMs extracted from SRTM/X-SAR data and SRTM/C-SAR data: A Case Study of the Thi-Qar Governorate /AL-Shtra City

USING LIDAR MEASUREMENTS FOR IMPROVING OR UP-DATING A DEM

DAMAGE DETECTION OF THE 2008 SICHUAN, CHINA EARTHQUAKE FROM ALOS OPTICAL IMAGES

Validation of the ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) Version 2 over the Conterminous United States

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 6, No 1, 2015

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Generation from Stereo Images

General Overview and Facts about the Irobland

GLL THE STUDY OF METHODS FOR CORRECTING GLOBAL DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS USING REMOTE SENSING DATA. I. Kolb, M. Lucyshyn, M. Panek

GeoSUR SRTM 30-m / TPS

Determining the Location of the Simav Fault

Positional Accuracy of the Google Earth Imagery In The Gaza Strip

GEOID UNDULATIONS OF SUDAN USING ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS COMPARED WITH THE EGM96 ANG EGM2008

Terrain and Satellite Imagery in Madre de Dios, Peru

QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATA FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES

Advanced Analysis of Differences between C and X Bands using SRTM Data for Mountainous Topography

Digital Elevation Models (DEM) / DTM

Global Assessment of the New ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model

ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF SRTM HEIGHT MODELS INTRODUCTION

SPOT DEM Precision Product description

ENGRG Introduction to GIS


Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

GEOMATICS. Shaping our world. A company of

AN EVALUATION OF SRTM, ASTER, AND CONTOUR BASED DEMS IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL TOPOGRAPHIC DATA (SRTM & ASTER GDEM) IN COMPARISON WITH LIDAR FOR TROPICAL MONTANE FOREST

Accuracy Assessment of SRTM Data Case Study: New Cairo, Hurghada and Toshka in Egypt

INTEGRATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION QUICKBIRD IMAGES TO GOOGLEEARTH

Updating of the Finnish Drainage Basin System and Register Case VALUE

AN EVALUATION ON THE DATA QUALITY OF SRTM DEM AT THE ALPINE AND PLATEAU AREA, NORTH-WESTERN OF CHINA

ENGRG Introduction to GIS

Digital Elevation Models (DEM)

Projections & GIS Data Collection: An Overview

CHAPTER EXIT CHAPTER. Models of Earth. 3.1 Modeling the Planet. 3.2 Mapmaking and Technology. 3.3 Topographic Maps CHAPTER OUTLINE

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Civil Engineering, Assiut University, Volume 2, pp , October 7-8.

Satellite ASTER Global Geoscience Maps

ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 Summary of Validation Results. August 31, 2011

The first high-precision gravimetric geoid of Hungary: HGG2013

Lab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Coordinate Systems

The following figures (Figs. DR-2 DR-6) show plots by location and formation in the Gar Basin. See Figure DR-7 for clast counts sites.

PGM2016: A new geoid model for the. Philippines

12/26/2012. Geographic Information Systems * * * * GIS (... yrezaei

Implementation of CLIMAP and GIS for Mapping the Climatic Dataset of Northern Iraq

Generation and analysis of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) using Worldview-2 stereo-pair images of Gurgaon district: A geospatial approach

Discussion on the 3D visualizing of 1: geological map

History & Scope of Remote Sensing FOUNDATIONS

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

Part : General Situation of Surveying and Mapping. The Development of Surveying and Mapping in China. The contents

INSAR DEM CALIBRATION FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING IN EASTERN UGANDA

RADAR Remote Sensing Application Examples

APPENDIX 2 OVERVIEW OF THE GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT (GPM) AND THE TROPICAL RAINFALL MEASURING MISSION (TRMM) 2-1

1/28/16. EGM101 Skills Toolbox. Oblate spheroid. The shape of the earth Co-ordinate systems Map projections. Geoid

Evaluation of GPS in Orthometric Heights Determination in Khartoum State (Sudan)

Stellenbosch University Digital Elevation Model (SUDEM) 2013 Edition

Catchment Delineation Workflow

ERDAS ER Mapper Software

USING IFSAR AND SRTM ELEVATION DATA FOR WATERSHED DELINEATION OF A COASTAL WATERSHED INTRODUCTION

Data Origin. Ron van Lammeren CGI-GIRS 0910

VISUALIZATION URBAN SPATIAL GROWTH OF DESERT CITIES FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

GEOIDS FAQ. November

An experience with ILWIS in connection with National Geochemical Mapping by Geological Survey of India

Bathymetry Data and Models: Best Practices

Lab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Output (Mapping)

Uncertainty modeling of glacier surface mapping from GPS: An example from Pedersenbreen, Arctic

Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis, Chapter 10

Scott A. True Project Scientist Geodesy & Geophysics Division Basic and Applied Research Office InnoVision Directorate

Contribution to global Earth observation from satellites

How to Construct Urban Three Dimensional GIS Model based on ArcView 3D Analysis

Different types of maps and how to read them.

ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF SRTM DEM AND ASTER GDEM DATASETS FOR THE COASTAL ZONE OF SHANDONG PROVINCE, EASTERN CHINA

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

Background Unified Mapping Project of NAMRIA Mapping of Typhoon-Affected Areas Final Output Conclusion

HIMALAYAN AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND GEOID OF NEPAL

Themes for Geomatics Conference. Geodesy Themes

Evaluation of the Earth Gravity Model EGM2008 in Algeria

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Towards a New Geoid Model of Tanzania Using Precise Gravity Data. 1. Introduction. Selassie David Mayunga

LEADS. The Essential Elements of a 3-D Geographic Coordinate

GeoWEPP Tutorial Appendix

Introduction. Elevation Data Strategy. Status and Next Steps

Version 1.1 GIS Syllabus

PROJECT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF 1/1000 SCALE BASE MAPS FROM COLOUR IMAGES USING DIGITAL CAMERAS IN BURSA METROPOLITAN AREA (BMA) IN TURKEY

Pan-Arctic Digital Elevation Map (Pan-Arctic DEM)

CONTROLLED TOPOGRAPHIC IMAGE MOSAICS FROM COMBINATION OF VIKING ORBITER IMAGES AND MARS ORBITER LASER ALTIMETER DATA. Working Group IV/5

MAPPING POTENTIAL LAND DEGRADATION IN BHUTAN

Data Origin. How to obtain geodata? Ron van Lammeren CGI-GIRS 0910

Integrating Geographical Information Systems (GIS) with Hydrological Modelling Applicability and Limitations

Terms GIS GPS Vector Data Model Raster Data Model Feature Attribute Table Point Line Polygon Pixel RGB Overlay Function

PRINCIPLES OF REMOTE SENSING. Electromagnetic Energy and Spectral Signatures

IAEG-SDGs WGGI Task Team Dec. 7, 2017, New York

Digital Elevation Models (DEM) / DTM

Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) & Photogrammetry Techniques

NASA Flood Monitoring and Mapping Tools

Transcription:

www.sgem.org ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF ASTER AND SRTM DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS: A CASE STUDY IN TURKEY H. Tugba Arli IL 1 Dr. R. Alpay ABBAK 2 1 Ministry of Health - Turkey 2 Selcuk University - Turkey ABSTRACT Digital Elevation Model (DEM) describes the physical and topographic information of earth s surface. Today, DEM produced by different methods is successfully utilized in many geospatial applications such as gravimetric geoid determination in geodesy, morphology analysis in geology, topographic map production in cartography etc. As known, every year, the new satellites are launched to space and provide the most current information about the earth s surface with different working principles and different image taking configurations and offer this information to end users from large variety disciplines. SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) and ASTER (Advanced Spacebased Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) are among these methods. ASTER has high resolution and superimposed image with Terra platform. SRTM aims to create a high resolution DEM of 80% of the Earth surface from radar images taken by Space Shuttle Endeavour. In this study, SRTM and ASTER DEM at one-arc second resolution are compared with local heights obtained from GPS-levelling data and accuracies of both DEMs are investigated in the territory of Turkey. The numerical results show that SRTM DEM gives better statics than ASTER DEM with respect to the local height data. Keywords: ASTER, SRTM, Digital Elevation Model, GPS-Levelling data, Validation.

17 th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017 INTRODUCTION Developments in remote sensing technologies provide new possibilities for digital height data. It has become a need in today's world to determine the Digital Elevation Models as quickly and reliably as. Apart from geodetic, photogrammetric and remote sensing methods, Digital Elevation Models can also be constructed from topographic maps providing high position accuracy. In this method, numerical data is obtained by digitizing the maps. Although the digitization of maps is automatic, it often requires manual intervention of problems. This disadvantage means a large amount of time, which requires intensive effort as well as high cost. However, the application areas of conventional geodetic surveying techniques are limited depending on the physical conditions. Different height measurement methods have been developed using a wide variety of measuring equipment in some techniques that require laborious and intensive work. Methods such as precise leveling, global positioning system, stereo SAR, and InSAR (Interferometric SAR) are used to determine the temporal variation and spatial distribution of elevation. The nature of the altitude data, the accuracy expectations, the economic and other factors that are influential affect the choice of geodetic technique to be applied. Another important advantage of these techniques is that data collection is not required to be in the region and work locally. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is used in many applications such as earth sciences, natural resources management, engineering projects, military applications, threedimensional visualization. The accuracy of the produced digital elevation model is important for different applications. Therefore, the investigation of the accuracy of the Digital Elevation Models produced remains important as a current field of study. In this study, it is aimed to determine the accuracy of height values obtained from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) and ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) Models and to find out which height data has better precision. GLOBAL DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL The elevation data of many regions are in the form of contour a map on the earth. Height values which are located on the maps with contour lines and irregular points, are transferred to the computer in the digital format and these files are converted to regular grid points. Grid points consist of a square shape covering the entire map surface, containing the height information of the coordinates in which they are located. The map created by these points is called grid map. The result is a model called the digital elevation model, in which the heights can be obtained as matrix points equally spaced horizontally and vertically [7]. The Global Digital Elevation Model is a suitable structure for showing the surface of the earth continuously changing in topography. This model is a general data source for terrain analysis and other 3D applications. In largescale standard topographic maps, it is desirable to keep the point density below roughly 30 m in Turkey. Considering the above criteria, a DEM which is between 36-42 parallel and 26-45 meridians for Turkey with a resolution of 1" 1" ( 30 30) consists of about 1.4 billion grid points. The width and intensity data corresponding to a field in Turkey width can be gathered by satellite techniques only in today's conditions. In this context, SRTM and ASTER are among the examples that can be given to GDEM Global Digital Elevation Models.

www.sgem.org SRTM Model Shuttle Radar Topography mission (SRTM) is a joint project between US National Geographic Intelligence Agency (NGIA), German and Italian Space agencies under the leadership of the American National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The aim of the project is to create a high-resolution Digital Elevation Model of 80% of the world's surface (area between 60 degrees north and 50 degrees south latitudes) from radar images taken with the aid of a space shuttle. With the project, a section almost all of the ground except for the regions close to the poles was selected as a target and aimed at establishing a DEM that has reached the highest level of integrity in this field by then. Figure 1. SRTM Coverage Map (URL-1) The SRTM project was carried out by the Space Shuttle Endeavor on 11-22 February 2000. Continuously collect data by viewing 99.97% of the earth in the mission area at least once (94.59% at least twice, 50% at three or more) with a 10-day orbital flight. Figure 1 is scanned area on the world map and the number of times it is displayed depending on the colors. The red areas on the map represent the not displayed land area. The areas covered by ocean waters are not taken into account (JPL, 2008). Figure 2. Space Shuttle used for SRTM (URL-2)

17 th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017 SRTM equipment to obtain two radar images taken from different locations consists of two radars attached to one under the shuttle and the other is attached to a shuttle and attached to a 60 m long bar extending out from the shuttle (Maathuis, 2004). SRTM heights are published on NASA servers in 3 different resolutions which are 1 grid interval (~30 meters resolution), 3 (~90 meters) and 30 (about 1 km). The SRTM1 is in hgt format with geographic lat/long coordinates and a 1 arc-second (30 m) grid of elevation postings. It is referenced to the WGS84/EGM96 geoid. Accuracies for this global product were ± 16 meters for vertical data. ASTER Model Terra satellite which is part of NASA's Earth Observing System (EOS), was launched from Van Der Berg Air Base in California in December 1999 and began operations in February 2000. There are five different modules on the satellite, ASTER, MODIS, CERES, MOPITT and MISR. It is generated from data collected from Advanced Space Based Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) module, a spaceborne earth observing optical instrument with single high resolution and superimposed image capture capability. ASTER is the only high-resolution device on the Terra platform. ASTER module is an important device in that it serves as a zoom lens for other Terra devices at change detection, calibration/validity. It was produced in partnership with American NASA, the Japanese Ministry of Trade and Industry and scientific and industrial organizations of both countries (Abrams vd., 2003). Today, it is still operated by NASA Earth Observing System (EOS), Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry of Japan (METI) and Japan Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center (ERSDAC). Table 1. General information about Terra Repeat Time 16 Day Revolution in a Day 14 Elevation Orbital Period 705 km 98.88 min. Inclination 98.3 o Image capture is done only by ASTER'S VNIR sensor from Terra satellite. ASTER has 14 bands in total. For the 14 bands, which serve different purposes, the resolution values change to 15, 30 and 90 m. The first 3 bands of the ASTER suit are referred to as VNIR (Visible Near Infrared) bands and include visible and near infra-red spectral range. The spatial resolution is 15 m in the horizontal plane. The ASTER GDEM covers land surfaces between 83 N and 83 S and is composed of 22,600 1 Ï1 tiles. The ASTER GDEM is in GeoTIFF format with geographic lat/long coordinates and a 1 arc-second (30 m) grid of elevation postings. It is referenced to the WGS84/EGM96 geoid. Pre-production estimated accuracies for this global product were 20 meters at 95 % confidence for vertical data and 30 meters at 95 % confidence for horizontal data (URL-3).

www.sgem.org NUMERICAL ANALYSIS Study Area The study area covers approximately 70,000 km² which is between 37-39 Northern latitudes and 31-35 Eastern longitudes (the provinces of Konya, Niğde, Aksaray and Karaman). Heights in the area are ranging from 50 m in the flat area to 3000 m in the mountainous areas (Fig. 3). This study area is an ideal study area in terms of containing different types of land cover and usage including water surface, urban, mountainous and agricultural areas. Figure 3. Study area Data Used As it is well known, the users should be aware of the accuracy of any model before use it in the project area. Accuracy is analyzed by reference data (ground truth). The reference data to be used in this study are 3074 GPS-Levelling heights with known positions provided by the Map General Command. Vertical datum is determined

17 th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017 according to Antalya Tide gauge station. ASTER and SRTM1 data are available free of charge to users worldwide via electronic download. ASTER Model which global vertical accuracy is in the range of 7-14 meters and SRTM1 Model which Global vertical accuracy is 16 meters. Data can be downloaded from national agency web addresses. Table 2. General characteristics of SRTM1 And ASTER Data General Characteristics of Data Source SRTM1 ASTER Generation and distribution METI/NASA NASA/USGS Release year 2003 ~ 2009 ~ Temporal Extend 11 days (in 2000) 2000 on going Coordinate System Geographical latitude and longitude Horizontal Datum WGS84 WGS84 Vertical Datum EGM96 EGM96 Geographic Dimension 1 x 1 1 x 1 File Formats hgt Geotiff Geographical latitude and longitude Posting interval 1 arc-second (30 m) 1 arc-second (30 m) DEM accuracy ± 16 m 7 14 m Coverage Area of missing data 60 degrees north ~ 56 degrees south Topographically steep area (due to radar characteristics) 83 degress north 83 degrees south Areas with no ASTER data due to constant cloud cover (supplied by other DEM) Comparison In this study, after the ASTER and SRTM DEMs of 3074 geographical coordinates are transferred to the Global Mapper program separately with the required interpolation calculations, the heights obtained from the ASTER and SRTM models were compared with the GPS-Nivelman heights and the accuracy analyzes were made with respect to each other. The software generates difference maps by calculating the differences between height values with the same x, y coordinates for two height data and provides statistical information. The most important feature of this program is the use of many height data and vector data without the need to merge them together. The statistical data calculated according to the heights obtained from the ASTER and SRTM1 Models with reference to the control data are shown in Table 3.

www.sgem.org Table 3. Statistical summary [m] Elevation Data Number of Points Min. Max. Median Mean Δh /n RMSE SRTM1 3074-47.57 48-1.80 7.53 11.795 ASTER 3074-40.43 42 2.56 9.18 12.485 The outliers in the observation were determined by the 3-sigma rule. Outliers were eliminated then accuracy assessments were performed with 3019 points for SRTM1 and 2992 points for ASTER. The accuracy of SRTM1 is 1.06 times more accurate than that of ASTER in Turkey. CONCLUSION This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ASTER and SRTM1 against to a ground truth data in Turkey. In this context the heights of 3074 data, of which geographical coordinates are known, are interpolated from both DEMs and compared with GPSleveling height. According to statistical tests, the root mean square error of differences obtained from ASTER is ± 12.46 m, and the root mean square error of differences obtained from SRTM1 is ± 11.80 m. According to these results, the accuracy of the SRTM1 is 1.106 times more accurate than that of the ASTER. If we assume that the leveling data in our hand is a few meters defective, the accuracy achieved for SRTM1 and ASTER remains within global accuracy limits. From the results of this study, it can be seen that the height data obtained from both Digital Elevation Models can be preferred in studies using scale maps of 1/100000 and above. REFERENCES [1] Abrams, M., Hook, S., Ramachandran, B., 2003, ASTER User Handbook Version 2. [2] Maathuis B., 2004, DEM from Active Sensor SRTM, WRS 20004. [3] JPL, 2008. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Jet Propulsion Labratory, California Institute of Technology, 01.05.2017, http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm [4] URL-1 http://radiomobile.pe1mew.nl/?geodata:srtm, 01.05.2017. [5]URL-2 http://elte.prompt.hu/sites/default/files/tananyagok/mapgridsanddatums/ch08s03.html [6] URL-3 http://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/ersdac/gdem/e/4.html [7] Venkatachalam, P,. Mohan, B.K., Kotwal, A., Mıshra, V., Muthuramakrıshnan, V., Pandya M., 2001. Automatic Delineation of Watersheds for Hydrological Applications Proc. ACRS 2001-22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5-9 November 2001, Singapore. Vol. 2, pp. 1096-1101.