ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY. Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Similar documents
PW Parkway ES Prince William County, Virginia WSSI #

City of Lockport Historic Resources Survey - Section METHODOLOGY

GIS and Predictive Modeling: Identifying North Carolina s Historic Archaeological Resources

RE: End of Field Letter for the Proposed Milton Mears Farm Road Solar Project, Milton, Chittenden County, Vermont

ADDITIONAL PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE UMORE PARK SAND AND GRAVEL MINING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA

Heritage Southwest: Program Summary

2017/03/31. Figure 9. British military graveyard at Fort Cox. Figure 10. Memorial stone. HIA: Fort Cox College Water and Sanitation Services

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

8 th 12 th Designing a Monitoring Plan Mapping & Analysis (Activities 1 2)

1.1 What is Site Fingerprinting?

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE DCP MIDSTREAM THREE RIVERS PLANT TO CGP 51 PROJECT IN LIVE OAK COUNTY, TEXAS

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Risk Identification using Hazus

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Draft exercise for share fair at Bozeman workshop only. This exercise is not ready for distribution. Please send helpful suggestions to

THE STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 1 EVANS AVENUE, PART OF LOTS 2 & 3, CONCESSION 10, TOWNSHI P OF AMARANTH, DUFFERIN COUNTY

Archaeological Survey and Evaluation at 8954 El Dorado Parkway, El Cajon, San Diego County, California

Humber River Watershed Scenario Modelling and Analysis Report. Section 4.6 Cultural Heritage

ESRI NONPROFIT/CONSERVATION GRANTS PROGRAM STATUS REPORT JANUARY 2010

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Hydraulic Impacts of Limestone Quarries and Gravel Pits. Jeff Green Minnesota DNR-Division of Ecological & Water Resources

Kansas Archaeology Month

Monitoring Program Terms of Reference HERITAGE AND CULTURE INFORMATION PLAN

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

o a West Midlands Wednesbury Woden Road Former Sandwell College Archaeological Evaluation Report Oxford Archaeology

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

5.2. Historic heritage. Photo: Vaughan Homestead, Long Bay Regional Park, Auckland. (Source: ARC). Historic heritage

Archaeological Predictive Modeling within the context of Paleo-river Terraces in the City of Prince George

Aerial Photography and Imagery Resources Guide

presents challenges related to utility infrastructure planning. Many of these challenges

Great California Delta Trail Blueprint for Contra Costa and Solano Counties GIS AND MAPPING MEMORANDUM JULY 2010

Town of Taos Request for Proposal Historic Preservation GIS Geodatabase Project April 2007

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

Archaeological Survey and Assessment of Four Wastewater Interceptor Routes in Garner, Wake Co., N.C. (EPA C )

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Business Office; Multiple Family Dwelling House; Parsonage; Single Family Dwelling House

Description of Simandou Archaeological Potential Model. 12A.1 Overview

4.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts

Project Background. March 9, Commissioners of Public Works 103 Saint Phillip Street Charleston, South Carolina 29203

Archaeological Heritage Impact Assessment

APPENDIX PHASE 1 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK

Original Report Prepared By: Advance Archaeology P.O. Box 493 Port Hope, ON L1A 3Z4. Licensed to: Donna Morrison, M.A. (P121) PIF #: P

PHASE 1 STUDIES UPDATE EROSION WORKING GROUP

IN Indiana Indiana Academic Standards

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

1.0 PURPOSE AND FORMAT OF THE FINAL EIR

Social Studies (4) Social Science

Geospatial Data Model for Archaeology Site Data

Part 1: Buildings to be Demolished. Submitted to

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

The Thoreau Institute at Walden Woods Library. The Edmund A. Schofield Collection. Maps and Oversize Items. A Guide to the Collection

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

Visual Thinking with Spatial Data: Using Spatial Organization to Access Library Information

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Geomorphology and Archaeology: Case Studies from Western New York

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

Geography Policy 2014

Scientific Investigations Report By Carl S. Carlson, Leslie A. DeSimone, and Peter K. Weiskel

Presented by: Bryan Bloch GIS Specialist DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship

Parowan Gap Nature s Perfect Observatory by V.Garth Norman

Report for Area Drainage Studies for 1320 MW (2x660 MW) THERMAL POWER PROJECT AT MIRZAPUR, U.P.

Lesson Title: Then and Now: How Society Alters Topography and Vegetation

HADRIANS WALL NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY

Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) Based Analysis of Historic Resources

Columbia River Project Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

STORMWATER ASSET MANAGEMENT:

Map and Atlas Collection

VEGETATION EVA BOEHRINGER

Glossary of Common Terms. Guide 2. BAJR Practical Guide Series held by authors

PHASE 1 STREAM GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT. Castleton River, Rutland County Vermont. Final Report

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Land Management Information Center. An Inventory of Its Records

The Contested Cultural Landscape of a Lebanese Border Town: MARJA AYOUN

Science EOG Review: Landforms

Application of GIS Technology in Reach- Scale Channel Migration Zone Mapping: Yellowstone River, Montana

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S. 6a Old Mill Way, Shirley, Southampton, Hampshire. Archaeological Evaluation. by Daniel Bray. Site Code: SOU 1640

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

APPENDIX E GREATER SPRINGFIELD RELIABILTIY PROJECT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE NEWGATE/PHELPS ROAD AND THE HATCHETT HILL ROAD AREAS

DOUBLE DUTCH. truth and tale on historical references used by nature developers in the Dutch wetland areas. Chris de Bont historical geographer at

DRAFT. Draft. 2 Analysis Exhibits

NODE. Reconnaissance Inventory of Wetland and Sedimentation Basin Sites New and Alamo Rivers Volume lof2

Exhibit A Description of Services Section 37 Floodplain Storage Design

Roman Farm, Nettleden, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire

City of Chino Hills General Plan Update 13GPA02 Scoping Meeting. June 4, 2013

Ocmulgee River Watershed Project Fact Sheet

Electronic Submission Format Guide Anthracite Preparation Plant Permit Application

Analysing changes in features and landscapes:

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

Wayland s Future Character

Transcription:

ACTON COMMUNITY WIDE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY Town of Acton and PAL, Inc.

Objectives and Scope of Work Four phase study; (1. research, 2. draft report outline, resource protection bylaw, 3. draft sensitivity maps, user guide, 4. final report, sensitivity maps and user guide). Identify patterns of past Native American and historic/early modern period settlement in Acton. Identify known and likely locations of archaeological sites within the town. Funding provided by town of Acton through Community Preservation Act (CPA). Survey was done in cooperation with Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC), under permit. Results used to develop plan/recommendations to identify and protect Acton s cultural resources. Existing and future permitting/approval processes for development, land use planning. open space acquisition.

Phase I Survey Activities Comprehensive background research using archival sources: Known archaeological, historic sites in state level (MHC) and local inventories. Documentary sources such as town histories (Acton, Concord, Maynard, Sudbury) library files, and historic maps of Acton (1794, 1830, Beers 1875, Sanborn 1916, etc). Museum and private artifact collections, avocational archaeologists (Mass. Archaeological Society). Cultural Resource Management (CRM) archaeological surveys of proposed development done in Acton under federal, state permit/review (sewage treatment plant, residential development). Environmental studies (geology, soil, hydrology etc).

Environmental Context for Acton Acton is within SUASCO basin; middle portion of Assabet drainage; Fort Pond, Nashoba, Nagog, Heath Hen Meadow brooks important tributary stream networks. Wetlands/marsh located along stream drainages and in upland settings (Spring Hill, Wills Hole, Pratts Brook). Natural ponds (Nagog, Grassy, Parkers Ponds) at head of stream drainages. Topography formed by glacial drumlin hills (Great, Faulkner, Strawberry, Nagog Hills), uplands of rocky ground moraine and deposits of sand/gravel glacial outwash along streams, wetlands. All these environmental features contribute to diversity of natural resources and affected both Native American and historic period Euro-American settlement in Acton.

Native American Context Acton is within SUASCO basin which has a long record of Native American settlement from Paleo Indian (10,000-9000 yrs ago) to Late Woodland (1000-400 yrs ago) periods. 17 known archaeological sites in Acton dating from Middle Archaic (7500 yrs ago) to Middle Woodland (1500 yrs ago) period. Few identified by avocational archaeologists (1940-50s); mostly by recent CRM surveys. Range from large complex site on Assabet River (Pine Hawk) to small camps on streams (Nagog Brook). Low number of known sites reflects focus on Concord, Sudbury River, less artifact collecting in Acton by avocational archaeologists. Native American settlement likely equal in intensity to other parts of SUASCO basin (Stow, Maynard, Concord). Based on environmental features (stream networks, wetlands, well drained soils, etc), results of fieldwork to date, expect many more archaeological sites to be present in town.

Historic Period Context Native American settlement survives until mid to late 17 th century near Nagog Pond, Fort Pond (Littleton). First Euro -American settlement (1650-60s) at small farms expanding from Concord, Iron Works Farm grant (South Acton). In 18 th century early industrial development (iron works, mills) on Nashoba (North, East Acton) and Fort Pond brooks (South Acton), farmsteads along primary roads. In 19 th century small industrial/commercial districts with mills, stores etc at villages in North, East, South, West Acton, roadways, railroad depots (after 1840s). Civic activity focus at Acton Center. Late 19 th /early 20 th century, expansion of commercial, industrial developments at South, West Acton near railroads. Farming still important in town economy. Known historic period archaeological sites in Acton, mostly industrial (mills), granite quarries, few farmsteads and related structures ( Potato Cave ). Only three sites on state inventory (MHC); recorded in CRM surveys. Many more historic period archaeological sites likely, based on background research and fieldwork to date.

Potential Historic Period Archaeological Sites, East Acton (Beers 1875 atlas)

Reconnaissance Survey Fieldwork Four survey units (North, Centre/East, South, West Acton) used to organize data collection during fieldwork. Units conform to nodes of historic period settlement. Maps with topographic, soils information and aerial photo on town GIS base map with wetlands, roads used as guide during fieldwork. Windshield survey (general areas) and walkover inspection (specific land parcels, known sites) used. Walkover inspection mostly in largest parcels of open land (Acton Conservation Land, town recreation land, etc). Collected information on present conditions (intact, developed/disturbed), environmental setting (upland hill, stream, pond, etc) evidence of archaeological sites, historic structures, estimated archaeological sensitivity. Location and present condition (intact, damaged, destroyed) of known archaeological sites confirmed.

Fieldwork (continued) Both known and unrecorded archaeological sites found during fieldwork documented with photographs, notes. Information from fieldwork used to develop sensitivity assessment and predictive models for both Native American and historic/early modern period archaeological resources.

Survey Units

Archaeologically Sensitive Areas - Native American Upland pond and wetlands zone Tributary stream network Small terraces and swales in upland hill zones

Historic/Early Modern Period Archaeological Resources Granite quarry, North Acton Pencil Factory, Nashoba Brook House foundation, near Nashoba Brook, North Acton Mill dam on Fort Pond Brook, South Acton

Predictive Model/Preliminary Archaeological Sensitivity Mapping Preliminary archaeological sensitivity maps were developed. Constructed from synthesis of background research, fieldwork (windshield survey, walkover inspection). Depict zones of high, moderate and low sensitivity for Native American and historic/modern period archaeological resources. Maps will be refined as Town Wide Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey moves through remaining phases of this study and new information becomes available.

Management Recommendations Review protection offered to archaeological sites, open space with archaeologically sensitive environmental settings. Apply Community Preservation Plan for Acton (2005) goals to archaeological resources: Preserve rural character of town, landscapes, historic and archaeological properties through open space acquisition, purchase of development rights. Update and expand inventory of archaeological resources in Acton. Education, outreach in town to increase public awareness of town s cultural resources. Increase level of local review for proposed development of remaining open land and developed areas with known cultural resources.

Management Recommendations (continued) Coordination of development/project review between Planning Board, Historical, Conservation Commissions, consultation with Acton Historical Society. Follow examples from other towns where this has been implemented for projects not covered by federal or state level review. Coordination with organizations involved in protection study of natural environments and open space in SUASCO basin, (SUASCO Watershed Community Council, Organization for Assabet River etc) and Native American community.