Current status of T2K experiment

Similar documents
The Neutrino Physics at Accelerators: the High Intensity Frontier

T2K neutrino oscillation results

T2K and the MAINZ Photon Beam

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

F. Retière (TRIUMF) For the T2K collaboration

K2K and T2K experiments

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

K2K and T2K. 2006/10/19 For the 2006 External Review Panel. Masato Shiozawa Kamioka Observatory

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

T2K: A long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Figure 1 Overview of the T2K experiment

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

E362 (K2K) 12 GeV PS review June

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

Tsuyoshi Nakaya (Kyoto Univ.)

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Final results from K2K and status of T2K

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

Single π production in MiniBooNE and K2K

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Oscillating Neutrinos and T2K

Next-Generation Water Cherenkov Detectors (1) Hyper-Kamiokande

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Neutrino Oscillations

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

Neutrino Oscillations

Sterile Neutrino Experiments at Accelerator

Neutrino and Other Beam-lines at

Solar and atmospheric ν s

θ13 Measurements with Reactor Antineutrinos

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

ν?? Solar & Atmospheric Oscillation Experiments Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Aspen Winter Conference January 21, 1999 )Past )Present )Future

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

What should be considered and improved for CP study.

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

UNO: Underground Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Observatory

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments

The NOνA Neutrino Experiment

Physics Potential of existing and future LBL ν beams

Neutrino oscillation experiments: Recent results and implications

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Neutrino interaction at K2K

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Long Baseline Neutrinos: As Far From A Tabletop Experiment As You Can Get. Scott Oser UBC. Colloquium at Toronto. October 20, 2011

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

- Future Prospects in Oscillation Physics -

Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments. Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

Proton Decays. -- motivation, status, and future prospect -- Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

Measurement of the Disappearance of Muon Neutrino in 250 km Long Base Line Experiment

Perspectives of neutrino oscillation physics with long baseline beams

The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

MINOS Oscillation Results from The First Year of NuMI Beam Operation

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Super-Kamiokande. Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, Japan

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

T2K presents hint of CP violation by neutrinos August 4, 2017 (strict press embargo until Aug 4, :00 JST) last updated 02/08/ :33 BST

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

The NuMI Off-axis ν e Appearance Experiment (NOνA)

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Oscillations

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~


Transcription:

ICEPP Symposium @Hakuba Feb 1 st 005 Current status of TK experiment 1.Introduction.TK experiment 3.Near neutrino detector 4.Summary Jun Kubota (Kyoto University) Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 1

Introduction Next goal of neutrino experiments To explore the neutrino oscillation phenomena beyond the discovery phase Mixing parameters 3 mass state(mass difference) Δm 1 : Solar ν & Reactor experiments 7~8 x 10-5 ev Δm 3 : Atm. ν & Long BaseLine experiments ~3 x 10-3 ev 3 mixing angles & 1 CPV phase Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata Matrix (U ij ) Long baseline experiments ν α > = ΣU αi ν i > Weak Mass eigenstates (Solar + Reactor) (Atm. ν) (Reactor) sin θ=0.-0.3 sin θ~1(>0.9) sin θ<0.1~0. Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005

Remaining questions How close θ 3 to π/4? Atmospheric neutrino measurements sin θ > 0.9 (Best fit sin θ ~ 1, Δm = ~3 x 10-3 ev ) Precise measurement of θ 3 and Δm 3 How large is 1 st 3 rd generation mixing? Reactor experiment θ 13 > 0 or θ 13 = 0? sin θ < 0.1~0. @ Δm ~.5 x 10-3 ev ) Measurement of θ 13 How large is the phase δ? Mass Hierarchy? Does sterile neutrino exist? Search for the CP violation Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 3

TK(Tokai to Kamioka) long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Approved in Dec.003 Conventional ν μ beam 0.75MW beam (1 st phase) Baseline ~ 95km Beam energy ~ 1GeV Will be adjusted to the oscillation maximum SK J-PARC Beam power Far detector Physics 1 st phase 0.75MW Super Kamiokande(50kt) nd phase ~4MW Hyper CP violation Kamiokande(1Mt) ν μ disappearance ν e appearance NC measurements Proton decay Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 4

TK collaboration Japan KEK, ICRR, U. Tokyo, Tohoku U., Hiroshima U., Kyoto U., Kobe U., Osaka City U., Miyagi U. of Education USA UCI, SUNY-SB, U. Rochester, U. Pennsylvania, Boston U., CSU, Duke U., Dominguez Hills, BNL, UCB/LBL, U. Hawaii, ANL, MIT, LSU, LANL, U. Washington Korea Seoul National U., Chonnam National U., Dongshin U., kangwon U., Kyungpook National U., KyuSang National U., SungKyunKwan U., Yonsei U. Poland Warsaw U. Spain U. Barcelona, U. Valencia Switzerland U. Geneva Russia INR Italy U. Roma, U. Bari, U. Napoli, U.Padova France CEA Saclay Canada TRIUMF, U. Alberta, York U., U. Toronto, U. Victoria, U. Regina China IHEP (Inst. of High Energy Phys.) UK RAL, Imperial College London, Queen Mary Westfield College London, U. Liverpool Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 5 Formed in May 003 1 countries, 53 institutions ~150 collaborators (not incl. students)

J-PARC overview J-PARC=Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex Nuclear Transmutation Material and Life Science Experimental Facility Nuclear and Particle Experimental Facility Linac(350m) 3GeV Synchrotron (5Hz,1MW) Neutrino Experimental Facility 50GeV Synchrotron (0.75MW) Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 6

Construction status Apr. 001: J-PARC Phase 1 construction was started Dec.003: Neutrino experiment was approved! 50GeV Synchrotron (Jan 05) 3GeV Synchrotron (Jan 05) LINAC (Nov 04) In 008, accelerator will be in operation. Start ν experiment physics run in 009! Feb 1 005 February, ICEPP@Hakuba005 004 7 11

Neutrino beam line Proton beam kinetic energy 50GeV (40GeV@T=0) # of protons / pulse 3.3x10 14 Beam power 750kW Bunch structure 8 bunches Bunch length (full width) 58ns Bunch spacing 598ns Spill width ~5μs Cycle 3.53sec Primary Primary Proton proton beam line line 50GeV ring Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 8 80m 130m Decay volume ( Decay volume Cryogenics target Target Target target station station Beam dump ( ) beam dump Muon monitor ( ) Near detector Extraction point muon monitor Near neutrino detector Extraction point ( )

(Ref.;BNL-E889 proposal: Off-axis beam(-3deg) http://minos.phy.bnl.gov/nwg/papers/e889) Quasi-monochromatic beam Beam energy is tunable to maximize the sensitibity! Target & Horn Decay volume θ = ~3deg SK Eν(GeV) 0.8 OA deg 0.4 0 OA 3deg 0 4 6 8 10 Pπ(GeV/c) Expected # of interactions @ SK (OA deg) ν μ total : ~4500/.5kt/yr CC : ~3000/.5kt/yr Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 ν e ~0.% at ν μ peak 9

Schematic view of the detectors p π ν 0m 140m 80m ~ km 95 km Muon monitor @ ~140m - First (spill-by-spill) monitoring of beam direction & intensity First Front Detector @ 80m - Neutrino energy spectrum, intensity and direction - Study neutrino interaction (Second Front Detector @ ~km) -Almost same Eν spectrum as for SK Far Detector @ 95km - Super-Kamiokande(50kt) Neutrino spectra at different distance Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 10 x 10 3 1800 1600 1400 100 1000 800 600 400 00 0 1.5km 95km 0.8km 0 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Eν (GeV) Difference of spectra Dominant systematic error in KK

41.4m Far detector Super-Kamiokande 50,000 ton water Cherenkov detector (.5.kt fiducial volume) Full water 10 th Dec 00 w/ half coverage(0%) 40m Back to full coverage(40%) Scheduled in winter 005 Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 11

Physics Goal at the 1 st phase(5yrs) Precise measurement of neutrino mixing matrix ν μ disappearance (ν μ ν x ) Accuracy: sin θ 3...1% Δm 3 a few %(< 1 x 10-4 ev ) Discovery and measurement of non-zero θ 13 ν e appearance (ν μ ν e ) sin θ 13...> 0.006 1 st evidence of 3-flavor mixing! 1 st step of a CP measurement Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 1

3-flavor Oscillation ν μ ν e ν τ ν 3 Δm atm Oscillation Probabilities when Δm ν ν 1 Δm sun 1 << Δm3 Δm13 θ 3 : ν μ disappearance P μ x 1 cos 4 ~1 θ 13 θ 13 : ν e appearance sin θ 3 sin ( 1.7 Δ m L / E ) 3 common ν P μ e sin ~0.5 θ 3 sin θ 13 sin ( 1.7 Δ m L / E ) 3 ν Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 13

How to reconstruct neutrino energy CC quasi elastic scattering ν μ + n μ + p ν θμ p μ It is possible to reconstruct Eν from Pμ and θμ E ν = m N m N Inelastic scatterings ν μ + n μ + p + π ν E E π μ μ m + p μ μ θμ p cosθ μ μ Inelastic CC quasi elastic Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 14

Measurement of θ 3, Δm 3 Use 1 ring μ-like events @ SK ν μ + n μ + p (= quasi-elastic enriched sample) to reconstruct neutrino energy ν Clear deficit is expected to be observed in the reconstructed ν energy p μ (E μ, p μ ) ~OA.5deg ~ No oscillation Δm 3 =.7 x 10-3 ev (assuming sin θ 3 =1.0) non-qe sin θ Δm Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 15

Measurement of θ 3, Δm 3 Sensitivities in the 1 st phase δ(δm 3 ) < 1 x 10-4 ev δ(sin θ 3 ) ~ 0.01 Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 16

ν e appearance search θ 13 measurement P e sin θ sin θ sin 1.7Δm L / μ 3 13 ( E ) Upper limit: sin θ 13 < 0.03 ~ 0.05 (@Δm = ~3 x 10-3 ev ) 3 ν Signal events @ SK single ring e-like event (ν e CC quasi-elastic scattering) Possible background sources 1) Beam ν e ν e /ν μ flux ~ 0.%(@peak) ) π 0 production -ring merged to 1-ring ν e + n e + p ν p e (P e, θ e ) Eν π 0 γ γ Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 17

ν e appearance search Expected # of background Event selection Select 1ring e-like events Apply π 0 rejection cut Energy cut (around the oscillation maximum) OA.5deg 5yrs Assuming sin θ 3 =1.0, Δm 3 =.7x10-3 ev ν μ CC (oscillated) 1π 0 ν μ NC coherent DIS Beam ν e 1) Generated in FV,897 43 71,410 5 ) 1ring e-like 5.9 74 41 64 3) e/π 0 separate 0.8 14.6 4.3 6 4) 0.4GeV<E ν rec <1.GeV 0.4 6.3 0.8 1.9 16 Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 18

Sensitivities in the 1 st phase(5yrs) Search for ν e appearance w/ beam MC and full SK detector simulation 35 30 5 0 OA deg., 5yrs Expected Signal+BG sin θ 13 =0.10 sin θ 3 =1.0 Δm =0.003eV Total BG BG from ν μ +antiν μ Δm (ev ) 10-1 10-90% C.L. sensitivities Excluded by CHOOZ 15 10 5 10-3 JHF 5year WBB OAB deg. NBB GeVπ CHOOZ excluded ~ x0 0 0 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Reconstructed Eν(GeV) Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 19 10-4 10-3 10-10 -1 1 sin θ μe Sensitivity region sin θ 13 >0.006(90%) sin θ 13 >0.018(3σ)

Near neutrino detector Off-axis detector (w/ magnet) 36m 17m SK direction SK 8.5m ν μ and ν e fluxes and energy spectra ν interaction study On-axis detector ν beam center (OA.5deg) Monitor ν beam 0m Φ Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 0

Off-axis detectors Muon Range Detector Measure momentum of μ Tracking detector -Fine Grained Detector consisting of scintillator Target of ν -TPC Measure momentum of μ, p and π UA1 magnet @NOMAD experiment Electron calorimeter Measure energy of EM shower by beam ν e & NC-1π 0 Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 1

On-axis detector OA 0deg OAdeg OA.5deg OA3deg Uncertainly of energy scale δ<eν>/<eν>~4mev/mrad δ(δm )=10-4 ev /mrad Oscillation probability It s necessary to measure ν beam direction w/ high accuracy and control precisely At least 0.5mrad is needed as a measurement accuracy Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005

On-axis detector (N-Grid detector) Φν profile 8m beam center -4 0 +4 (m) Monitor neutrino beam direction, profile and stability 8m Iron block ν Tracker Counter μ Veto Counter ~1.5m 0.1m 1m 1m Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 3

On-axis detector (N-Grid detector) 5 modules at one axis 6500 5500 Reconstructed beam center 40 0 0-0 -40 4500-30 -0-10 0 10 0 30 True Beam center -4-0 4 (m) Reconstructed ν beam profile Good linear relation. The accuracy of the center is ~5cm. corresponding to 0.18mard (fulfill the request) Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 4

Summary The first Super-beam Long baseline ν experiment TK (Tokai to Kamioka) experiment was approved Construction was started 5 years to complete (JFY 004~008) Start physics run in 009 Try to discover non-zero θ 13 (sin θ 13 >0.006 @90%C.L.) Precision measurement of θ 3 & Δm 3 (precision x 10) 1 st step to the CP violation in the lepton sector Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 5

Supplement Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 6

Tight e/π 0 separation Shower direction from the beam axis cosθ νe : γ from coherent π 0 tends to have a forward peak Force to find nd ring and E(γ)/E(γ1+γ): The second ring energy is larger for BG Likelihood diff. between 1-ring and -rings Invariant mass: Small for ν e ν μ BG ν e 3.5.5 3 1.5 0.5 1 0 0 0.5 1 1. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0 ν μ ν e cosθ νe cosθ νe 0 0.5 1 cosθ νe.5 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 1.6 1.4 1. 0.8 1 0.6 0.4 0. 0 ν μ E(γ)/(E(γ1)+E(γ)) E(γ)/E(γ1+γ) ν e 0 0.5 0.5 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 0-500 0 500 0.5 1 0 0 100 00 Feb 1 005 cosθ νe E(γ)/(E(γ1)+E(γ)) ICEPP@Hakuba005 likelihood difference inv. mass (MeV) 7 E(γ)/E(γ1+γ).5 1.75 1.5 1.5 0.75 1 0.5 0.5 0 ν μ likelihood difference Likelihood ν e -500 0 500 Likelihood 3.5.5 3 1.5 3.5.5 3 1.5 ν μ ν e inv. mass (MeV) Mγγ 0.5 1 0 0 100 00 Mγγ

N-Grid detector Event Selection [1] hits in the scintillator. [] No Veto Hits [1] & [] Eν spectrum 0 1 3 4 5 Eν(GeV) Feb 1 005 ICEPP@Hakuba005 8