Atomic force microscopy study of polypropylene surfaces treated by UV and ozone exposure: modification of morphology and adhesion force

Similar documents
Laser induced chemical and physical modifications of polymer films: dependence on the irradiation wavelength

Lecture 12: Biomaterials Characterization in Aqueous Environments

Basic Laboratory. Materials Science and Engineering. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

Surface Hydrophilic Treatment of Polyester Films via UV irradiation

Applied Surface Science CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation JST, Japan

Features of static and dynamic friction profiles in one and two dimensions on polymer and atomically flat surfaces using atomic force microscopy

Supporting Information

Interfacial forces and friction on the nanometer scale: A tutorial

A General Equation for Fitting Contact Area and Friction vs Load Measurements

Surface Characteristics of a Polyimide Film Treated with a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma

Use of chemically modified AFM tips as a powerful tool for the determination of surface energy of functionalised surfaces

Outline Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM)

MSE640: Advances in Investigation of Intermolecular & Surface Forces

Specific ion effects on the interaction of. hydrophobic and hydrophilic self assembled

Lorentz Contact Resonance for viscoelastic measurements of polymer blends

Supplementary Information for. Effect of Interface on Surface Morphology and Proton Conduction of Polymer Electrolyte Thin Films

Lorentz Contact Resonance for viscoelastic measurements of polymer blends

General concept and defining characteristics of AFM. Dina Kudasheva Advisor: Prof. Mary K. Cowman

Van der Waals Interaction between Polymer Aggregates and Substrate Surface Analyzed by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

Module 26: Atomic Force Microscopy. Lecture 40: Atomic Force Microscopy 3: Additional Modes of AFM

Model dependence of AFM simulations in non-contact mode

Atomic and molecular interactions. Scanning probe microscopy.

CNPEM Laboratório de Ciência de Superfícies

RHK Technology Brief

A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO A STICKY PROBLEM

Lecture 4 Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

Hydrophilization of Fluoropolymers and Silicones

Atomic Force Microscopy imaging and beyond

Instrumentation and Operation

Scanning Force Microscopy

Dopant Concentration Measurements by Scanning Force Microscopy

Atomic Force Microscope Imaging of the Aggregation of Mouse Immunoglobulin G Molecules

Understanding Surface Energy

STUDY ON NEW SURFACE PRETREATMENTS OF PAINTING TO CFRP LAMINATES

Supplementary Materials to Addressable Photo-Charging of Single Quantum Dots Assisted with Atomic Force Microscopy Probe

PLASMA-POLYMER MODIFICATION OF BASAL PLANE GRAPHITE SURFACES FOR IMPROVED BIOCOMPATIBILITY

FEM-SIMULATIONS OF VIBRATIONS AND RESONANCES OF STIFF AFM CANTILEVERS

Supporting information

Case Study of Electronic Materials Packaging with Poor Metal Adhesion and the Process for Performing Root Cause Failure Analysis

Changes of polymer material wettability by surface discharge

Magnetic imaging and dissipation force microscopy of vortices on superconducting Nb films

Effect of sliding velocity on capillary condensation and friction force in a nanoscopic contact

DETERMINATION OF THE ADHESION PROPERTIES OF MICA VIA ATOMIC FORCE SPECTROSCOPY

Contents. What is AFM? History Basic principles and devices Operating modes Application areas Advantages and disadvantages

M. Enachescu Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Surface treatment of metals using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet and their surface characteristics

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Ultramicroscopy

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

AFM Imaging In Liquids. W. Travis Johnson PhD Agilent Technologies Nanomeasurements Division

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Part I

Abstract. The principles and applicability of surface structure and hydrophobicity of polymers (PS, PDMS),

Scanning Probe Microscopy. Amanda MacMillan, Emmy Gebremichael, & John Shamblin Chem 243: Instrumental Analysis Dr. Robert Corn March 10, 2010

Electronic Supplementary Information

Material Anisotropy Revealed by Phase Contrast in Intermittent Contact Atomic Force Microscopy

Probing the Hydrophobic Interaction between Air Bubbles and Partially. Hydrophobic Surfaces Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Measurements of interaction forces in (biological) model systems

Point mass approximation. Rigid beam mechanics. spring constant k N effective mass m e. Simple Harmonic Motion.. m e z = - k N z

Nanoscale IR spectroscopy of organic contaminants

UV patterning of polyimide: differentiation and characterization of surface chemistry and structure

Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro"

nano-ta: Nano Thermal Analysis

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Contents. Preface XI Symbols and Abbreviations XIII. 1 Introduction 1

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

RP 2.7. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 1525

Force-distance studies with piezoelectric tuning forks below 4.2K

The velocity dependence of frictional forces in point-contact friction

Improving the accuracy of Atomic Force Microscope based nanomechanical measurements. Bede Pittenger Bruker Nano Surfaces, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Scanning capacitance spectroscopy of an Al x Ga 1Àx NÕGaN heterostructure field-effect transistor structure: Analysis of probe tip effects

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Supplementary Note 1: Fabrication of Scanning Thermal Microscopy Probes

Design and Analysis of Various Microcantilever Shapes for MEMS Based Sensing

Princeton University. Adhsion and Interfacial Failure in Drug Eluting Stents

Photopolymers designed for laser ablation photochemical ablation mechanism

Imaging Polymer Morphology Using Atomic Force Microscopy

Investigation of pulse shapes and time constants for NaI scintillation pulses produced by low energy electrons from beta decay

L8: The Mechanics of Adhesion used by the Gecko

Review. Surfaces of Biomaterials. Characterization. Surface sensitivity

The Origins of Surface and Interfacial Tension

For preparing Sn adatoms on the Si(111)-(7 7) surface, we used a filamenttype

CHARACTERIZATION of NANOMATERIALS KHP

ARGON RF PLASMA TREATMENT OF PET FILMS FOR SILICON FILMS ADHESION IMPROVEMENT

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMA POLYMER FILMS

Surface Free Energy Effects in Sputter-Deposited WN x Films

SURFACE MODIFICATION OF POLYPROPYLENE BY PHOTOGRAFTING OF VINYL ACETATE MONOMERS

Scanning Probe Microscopy. L. J. Heyderman

BDS2016 Tutorials: Local Dielectric Spectroscopy by Scanning Probes

AFM Studies of Pristine PCBM Changes Under Light Exposure. Erin Chambers

Site seectivity in the initial oxidation of the Si 111-7=7 surface

Bursting Drops in Solids Caused by High Voltages

Chapter 2 Correlation Force Spectroscopy

Effects of plasma treatment on the precipitation of fluorine-doped silicon oxide

International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences and Technology

Morphological and chemical analysis of PP film treated by Dielectric Barrier Discharge

Notes on Rubber Friction

Supplementary Figure 1 Detailed illustration on the fabrication process of templatestripped

Electron Beam Curable Varnishes. Rapid Processing of Planarization Layers on Polymer Webs

Effect of Non-Ionic Surfactants on Dispersion and. Polar Interactions in the Adsorption of Cellulases. onto Lignin

Amphiphilic diselenide-containing supramolecular polymers

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Transcription:

Ž. Applied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 Atomic force microscopy study of polypropylene surfaces treated by UV and ozone exposure: modification of morphology and adhesion force H.-Y. Nie ), M.J. Walzak, B. Berno, N.S. McIntyre Surface Science Western, The UniÕersity of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7 Abstract Exposing polypropylene Ž PP. to ozone in the presence of UV light is a simple and effective way of modifying its surface to improve its wettability and adhesion. Atomic force microscopy Ž AFM. showed a dramatic change in the morphology and a clear increase in the adhesion force resulting from the modification of a PP film by UVrozone exposure. A relationship has been demonstrated between a change in surface energy Ž measured by wetting contact angle. and the adhesion force Ž measured by AFM.. q 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: AFM; Polypropylene film; UVrozone treatment; Adhesion force; Surface energy change 1. Introduction For many applications in the plastics industry, the surface of polypropylene Ž PP. needs to be modified in order to improve its wettability and adhesion properties. One of the techniques used to modify the surface is the exposure of the polymer to ozone in the presence of UV light w1,2 x. This exposure results in an increase in the surface energy of the polymer through the breaking of molecular bonds on the surface and the addition of polar oxygen atoms. Changes in the surface composition and wettability have been extensively investigated with XPS and contact angle goniometry w1 3 x. ) Corresponding author. Tel.: q1-519-661-2173; Fax: q1-519- 661-3709; E-mail: hynie@surf.ssw.uwo.ca Understanding local changes in the structure and surface energy of the modified PP film is important in controlling the modification. In this paper we report on the changes in the surface morphology and adhesion force of PP film surfaces after modification measured using atomic force microscopy Ž AFM. wx 4. AFM is capable of imaging surface features on a nanometer-scale and of measuring the adhesion force between the probe tip and sample surface w5 8 x. The morphology changes from a fibre-like network structure to one of mounded reaction products as a first step in the modification. We also found that the adhesion force measured on the surface shows a remarkable increase after the modification. The adhesion force measurement is consistent with previous contact angle observations w1,3x and can be related to the surface energy increase upon modification. 0169-4332r99r$ - see front matter q 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Ž. PII: S0169-4332 98 00879-4

628 ( ) H.-Y. Nie et al.rapplied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 2. Experimental Both non-contact and contact modes of a commercial AFM Ž Explorer, TopoMetrix. were employed in this study. In non-contact AFM, a stiff silicon cantilever with a spring constant of about 28 Nrm was used which was 130 mm long, 29 mm wide and 3.7 mm thick with a cantilever resonance of approximately 280 khz. The tip apex radius was ; 20 nm. Non-contact AFM functions by monitoring the reduction of the oscillation amplitude of the cantilever when the tip is close to the surface. Images were obtained at a set point where the oscillation amplitude became half of that in free space. A soft silicon nitride cantilever with a nominal spring constant of 0.03 Nrm was used in contact mode AFM. The cantilever was 200 mm long, 18 mm wide and 0.6 mm thick with an attached tip whose apex radius was ; 20 nm. Contact mode AFM was used to obtain lateral force images wx 9 from the torsional movement of the cantilever w10x and to measure adhesion forces from force distance curves. Thermally extruded, biaxially oriented PP wx 1 film produced from a homopolymer resin Žmolecular 5 weight M s 1.9 = 10, polydispersitys 6.0. w was used in this study. Surface modification was performed by exposing the PP film to ozone in a chamber with a mercury vapour lamp generating UV light wx 1. Dry air at a flow rate of 1000 sccm Ž standard cubic centimetres per minute. was provided through a generator which produced ozone at a concentration of 2=10 17 moleculercm 3 as detected by UV absorption. All AFM measurements were performed in ambient atmosphere with a typical relative humidity of 50%. The images consist of 500 lines with 500 points per line collected at a scan rate of 10 mmrs. 3. Results and discussion Fig. 1 shows non-contact AFM topographic images for Ž. a the untreated, Ž. b 3 min and Ž. c 15 min UVrozone treated PP film surfaces. The untreated PP film surface is characterized by a fibre-like network structure which results from the biaxial orientation process. The resulting strand diameters are approximately 40 nm. After UVrozone treatment for 3 min, the PP film surface shows a remarkable change in morphology from the original surface, as small mounds form on the strands. During the modification, atomic oxygen formed from the photo-decomposition of ozone is believed to react with PP chains wx 1. Extended oxidation of PP results in the formation of low molecular weight oxidized material Ž LMWOM. which is believed to be a component of the surface structure. When the treatment time was increased to 15 min, the morphology of the modified surface shows a mixture of small mounds and large droplets. These droplets are thought to be formed by the aggregation of the mounds during the UVrozone exposure. The shape of the droplets may be determined by the surface tension of the liquid-like materials formed during the modification process. Because both mounds and droplets coexist on the longer-term treated PP film surface, it is also possible that the droplet consists of different materials from the surrounding mounds. With increased surface oxidation, it is not hard to imagine that the polymer chain scission continues, the molecular weight of the newly formed material decreases, which increases the liquidity of the material and results in aggregation of the mounds on the surface to form the droplets. Because the UVrozone modification is used to improve the wettability and adhesion force on the surface, we measured force distance curves to probe adhesion force variations on modified PP film surfaces for which the AFM images showed that the surface morphology had changed. Shown in Fig. 1d are three typical force-distance curves measured on untreated, 3 and 15 min treated PP films, respectively. Force distance curves are measured by bringing the tip from a distance Ž e.g., 500 nm. to make contact between the tip and the surface Ži.e., origin point. followed by retraction of the tip from the surface. The arrow lines in Fig. 1d show the adhesion forces between the tip and three different surfaces, which are measured at the point where the tip is eventually pulled from the surface in the retracting process w5 8 x. It is clear that the adhesion force increased with increasing treatment time. The reproducibility for the change in the adhesion forces observed in Fig. 1d was determined by measuring a number of force distance curves on various

( ) H.-Y. Nie et al.rapplied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 629 Fig. 1. Non-contact AFM topographic images for Ž. a untreated, Ž. b 3 min, and Ž. c 15 min UVrozone treated PP films in a 1000 nm square area. Gray-scale ranges for the three images are 21, 16, and 26 nm, respectively. Three typical force distance curves obtained on the three different films are shown in Ž. d, in which the insert arrow lines indicate the adhesion forces. Shown in Ž. e are histograms of the adhesion forces for the untreated Ž open bar., 3 min Ž close bar. and 15 min Ž striped bar. treated PP films, respectively. The speed of the tip movement during force distance curve measurement was 1000 nmrs. locations for the three different films. The histograms for the distribution of the adhesion force measured from the untreated, 3 and 15 min treated PP films are shown in Fig. 1e. The average adhesion forces are 4.3, 8.9 and 13.3 nn for the untreated, 3 and 15 min treated PP films, respectively. The standard deviations of those adhesion forces are 0.7, 0.9 and 2.2 nn, respectively. It is clear that there exists a

630 ( ) H.-Y. Nie et al.rapplied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 remarkable difference in adhesion force among the three different films. We noted from Fig. 1e that for the 15 min treated PP film, the adhesion force has a broad distribution and its lower part overlaps with the higher part of that of the 3 min treated PP film. It is likely that the droplets and surrounding mounds observed in Fig. 1c are responsible for this broad distribution. The overlap indicates that the mounds and surrounding mounds, respectively, on the 3 and 15 min treated PP films may have similar adhesion force. In the case of contact between a sphere and flat surface, the Johnson Kendal Roberts theory indicates that the adhesion force F is related to the work of adhesion w Ž or interaction energy. as F s yž 3r2. p Rw w11 x, where R is the radius of the sphere. The work of adhesion can be related to surface energies of the sample g1 and tip g 2 and their interfacial energy g12 as w s g1 q g 2 y g12 w11 x. In our experiment the surface energy of the tip, g 2, is considered to be constant; therefore, the change in adhesion force is a measure of the combination of the surface energy of the sample surface and the interfacial energy between the tip and sample surface. Moreover, the properties of the tip itself contribute to the measurable adhesion force in the force distance curve. In order to eliminate possible changes that could affect the interaction between the tip and surface, we took the precautions of using the same tip and completing the experiment in a short time. In practice, several tips were used in the experiment and additional scatter in the adhesion force measurements was introduced. However, the trend of an increase in the adhesion force with increasing UVrozone treatment was always observed. The adhesion force measured by AFM indicates an increase in the surface energy, which is consistent with the data from contact angle measurements wx 1. The force distance measurement thus appears to be a promising method to evaluate the change in surface energy, which is the main parameter governing the wettability and adhesion properties on polymer surfaces. Fig. 2 shows the non-contact AFM topographic images of the PP surface treated for 3 min Ž. a and 15 min Ž. b after being washed with water. For the 3 min treated PP film, as shown in Fig. 2a, the surface Fig. 2. Non-contact AFM topographic images of PP films treated with UVrozone for Ž. a 3 min and Ž. b 15 min, after water washing, in a 1000 nm square area. Gray-scale ranges for the two images are 25 and 12 nm, respectively. shows some recovery so that it resembles the untreated surface, possibly because the modification is less extensive than that of PP film surface treated for longer time. The diameter of the strands in the net-like structure in Fig. 2a is roughly twice of that of the untreated strands, as can be seen in Fig. 1a. This thickening may result from a cross-linking interaction in the strands or by the selective destruction of the finest strands in the network. For the 15 min treated PP film, it is clear from Fig. 1c and Fig. 2b that the droplet structures disappeared and the surface is dominated by mounds. However, complete recovery of this long-time-treated PP film surface to the original fibre-like structures was not observed. This observation is consistent with XPS data and contact angle data wx 3, which indicated that the oxygen to carbon ratio and contact angle on

( ) H.-Y. Nie et al.rapplied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 631 different areas on the modified PP film surface. The droplet structures show a smooth lateral force distribution, while the surrounding surface shows much smaller features. As shown in Fig. 3b, on the other hand, lateral force imaging shows that only the smaller features remain after water-washing. The lateral force data in Fig. 3 are derived from the torsional movement of the cantilever when scanning the tip across the surface, and can be a measure of the interaction between the tip and surface features. The different lateral force distributions on the droplet surface and surrounding surface indicate different surface structures. Therefore, the lateral force image in Fig. 3a shows that there may be two phases on the modified PP film surface. On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 3b, the modified PP film surface after washing shows only one structure, indicating the LMWOM had been washed away and the underlying surface without local differences remains. Judging from only the topographic images, it might be hard to recognize that there are two different phases on the long-time modified PP film surface. 4. Conclusion Fig. 3. Lateral force images for Ž. a 15 min UVrozone treated PP film surface and Ž. b its water-washed surface in a 1000 nm square area. Gray-scale ranges for the two images are 1.5 na, which is the direct output of the photodetector corresponding to the torsional movement of the cantilever. the water-washed UVrozone treated PP film did not return to the values for the original PP film. In fact, both XPS and IR measurements of the UVrozone treated PP film indicated that the treatment extends deeply into the treated PP film wx 2. By comparing Fig. 1c and Fig. 2b, it is apparent that water-washing resulted in the disappearance of the droplet structure. In order to probe differences between the droplet structure and surrounding mounds, we performed lateral force imaging on the 15 min treated sample before and after water-washing. The lateral force images are shown in Fig. 3, while the concurrently collected contact AFM topographic images Ž not shown here. are comparable to those seen in Fig. 1c and Fig. 2b, respectively. We can clearly see in Fig. 3a that the image shows two Exposing a polypropylene film to UV light and ozone resulted in the formation of mounds which arise from the formation of low-molecular-weightoxidized-materials. Also, an increase in surface energy, which is the reason for the improvement of wettability and adhesion performance of polymer, was deduced from the force distance curve measurement which allowed us to measure the adhesion force between the surface and tip. Increasing the treatment time showed an increase of the surface energy and the formation of droplets which are considered to be the aggregation of short oxidized polymer chains formed during the oxidation process. The materials formed during the modification were soluble in water; however, complete recovery to the original state was not observed. References wx 1 M.J. Walzak, S. Flynn, R. Foerch, J.M. Hill, E. Karbashewski, A. Lin, M. Strobel, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 9 Ž 1995. 1229.

632 ( ) H.-Y. Nie et al.rapplied Surface Science 144 145 1999 627 632 wx 2 M. Strobel, M.J. Walzak, J.M. Hill, A. Lin, E. Karbashewski, C.S. Lyons, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 9 Ž 1995. 365. wx 3 J.M. Hill, E. Karbashewski, A. Lin, M. Strobel, M.J. Walzak, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 9 Ž 1995. 1575. wx 4 G. Binnig, C.F. Quate, Ch. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 Ž 1986. 930. wx 5 H.A. Mizes, K.-G. Loh, R.J. Miller, S.K. Ahuja, E.F. Grabowski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 Ž 1991. 2901. wx 6 G. Toikka, R.A. Hayes, J. Ralston, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 180 Ž 1996. 329. wx 7 E.W. van der Vegte, G. Hadziioannou, Langmuir 13 Ž 1997. 4357. wx 8 K. Feldman, T. Tervoort, P. Smith, N.D. Spencer, Langmuir 14 Ž 1998. 372. wx 9 H.-Y. Nie, M.J. Walzak, N.S. McIntyre, A.M. El-Sherik, Appl. Surf. Sci. 144 145 Ž 1999. 633, these Proceedings. w10x G. Meyer, N. Amer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 Ž 1990. 2089. w11x J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, 1991, p. 326.