What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash?

Similar documents
Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

Geomorphology Studies

Geomorphology 5. Stream Sediment Stream Sediment

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JANUARY 2005 STORM, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Calculation of Stream Discharge Required to Move Bed Material

GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip

Geomorphology Geology 450/750 Spring Fluvial Processes Project Analysis of Redwood Creek Field Data Due Wednesday, May 26

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

Squaw Creek. General Information

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Can fluvial-hydraulic models accurately predict bed load transport in gravel bed streams?

Sediment Transport Analysis for Stream Restoration Design: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Assignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435

APPENDIX B Hydraulic Considerations for Pipeline Crossings of Stream Channels

GLG598 Surface Processes and Landform Evolution K. Whipple Fall 2012 VERDE RIVER: FLOW MECHANICS, ROUGHNESS, AND SHEAR STRESS

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

GLG598 Surface Processes and Landform Evolution K. Whipple VERDE RIVER: FLOW MECHANICS, ROUGHNESS, AND SHEAR STRESS

Water quality needs: Flow, velocity. Fish biologists need: Critical depth or velocity. Hydrology gives flows m 3 /s or day

Sediment transport and river bed evolution

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Big Wood River. General Information

Technical Memorandum No

An Adaptive Assessment of the Flushing Flow Needs of the Lower Poudre River, Colorado: First Evaluation

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

SELBY CREEK STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION AND RIPARIAN REVEGETATION PROJECT: GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District. Sediment Trap Assessment Saginaw River, Michigan

Estimating Stream Gradient Using NHD Stream Lines and DEM Data

STABILIZATION OF THE H&CT RAILWAY STONE DAM WALTER E. SKIPWITH, PE, JOYCE CRUM, AIA AND JOHN BAUMGARTNER, PE. Introduction.

Probabilistic Evaluation of a Meandering Low-Flow Channel. February 24 th, UMSRS

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

MODELING OF LOCAL SCOUR AROUND AL-KUFA BRIDGE PIERS Saleh I. Khassaf, Saja Sadeq Shakir

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Stream Entrainment, Erosion, Transportation & Deposition

Perspectives on river restoration science, geomorphic processes, and channel stability

Two-Dimensional Simulation of Truckee River Hydrodynamics

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY The Electronic Journal of the International Association for Environmental Hydrology VOLUME

Characteristics of Step-Pool Morphology in the Mountain Streams of Japan

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

Sediment and Erosion Design Guide

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FLUVIAL SEDIMENT DELIVERY, NEKA RIVER, IRAN. S.E. Kermani H. Golmaee M.Z. Ahmadi

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

Annotated Bibliography of River Avulsions Pat Dryer Geography 364 5/14/2007

Field Methods to Determine/ Verify Bankfull Elevation, XS Area & Discharge

CHANNEL GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO DISTURBANCES ASSESSED USING STREAMGAGE INFORMATION

What do you need for a Marathon?

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Sediment Transport V: Estimating Bed-Material Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers. UC Berkeley January 2004 Peter Wilcock

~ W 89 CONTENTS J-1 J-1 J-6 J-7 J-9 J-10 J-10 J-10

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix J. Vermont Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curves

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Lecture 10: River Channels

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

WASHLOAD AND FINE SEDIMENT LOAD. By Hyoseop S. Woo, 1 Pierre Y. Julien, 2 M. ASCE, and Everett V. Richardson/ F. ASCE

Technical Supplement 3E. Rosgen Stream Classification Technique Supplemental Materials. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

GLG362/GLG598 Geomorphology K. Whipple October, 2009 I. Characteristics of Alluvial Channels

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Downstream changes in the channel geometry of a large gravel bed river

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

Evaluation of Scour Depth around Bridge Piers with Various Geometrical Shapes

(3) Sediment Movement Classes of sediment transported

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Session C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design

Final Report for TWDB Contract No

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Rivers and Streams. Streams. Hydrologic Cycle. Drainage Basins and Divides. Colorado River Drainage Basin. Colorado Drainage Basins.

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE 50- AND 100-YEAR STORMS, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Stream Classification

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BED MORPHOLOGY IN THE REACH BETWEEN CABRUTA AND CAICARA IN ORINOCO RIVER.

* Chapter 9 Sediment Transport Mechanics

Summary of Sediment Data from the Yampa River and Upper Green River Basins, Colorado and Utah,

Upper Drac River restoration project

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

PR122A NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

5/4/2017 Fountain Creek. Gage Analysis. Homework 6. Clifton, Cundiff, Pour, Queen, and Zey CIVE 717

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

Platte River Flow and Sediment Transport Between North Platte and Grand Island, Nebraska ( )

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

The how, why, and lessons learned

Transcription:

Gregory Indivero 31 October 2011

What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash? What discharge was required to deposit observed flood debris from August 16, 2010 flood?

Red & Columbus Canyons Un-gauged, Ephemeral Wash 5 th Largest Drainage of CNM

Red Canyon Wash Study Reach

Fairly Straight Alluvial Channel 300 Feet Long 20 Feet Wide

Establish Reach & Cross Sections Survey Thalweg, Flood Debris & Cross Sections Conduct a Pebble Count at Cross Sections Create Grain Size Distribution Plots Solve Shields Equation for Critical Shear Stress, τ c Model Channel With HEC-RAS -Fluctuate Discharge In Channel Until τ c Is Achieved -Fluctuate Discharge Until Flood Debris Elevation is Achieved

Run Tape Measure down the Thalweg Establish Bench Mark Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

Elevation in Feet Surveying the Thalweg o Slope = 0.0261 Red Canyon Wash Long Profile 4938 4936 4934 4932 4930 4928 4926 Red Canyon Wash Thalweg Energy Gradient (Slope) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 y = -0.0261x + 4935.3 Dis tance Downstream in Feet R² = 0.9846 Photo Credit: Gigi Richard

Surveying Cross Section 1 Surveying Cross Section 3 Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

Elevation in Feet Elevation in Feet 4939 4938 Cross Section 1 4937 4936 4935 4934 4933 4932 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ocross Sections 1 & 3 124 Feet Apart Dis tance From Left B ank in Feet 4934 4933 Cross Section 3 4932 4931 4930 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Distance From Left Bank in Feet

Percent Finer Red Canyon Wash 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Cross Section 1 Cross Section 2 Cross Section 3 20 10 0 1 10 100 1000 Particle Diameter (mm) 100 Grains Counted At Each Cross Section Average D 84 = 24 mm

Shields Equation τ c = τ * c(ρ s ρ w )gd 84 Where: τ * c = Dimensionless Shear Stress ρ s, ρ w = Density of Sediment (Quartz) & Water Respectively g = Gravitational Constant D 84 = 84 th Percentile of Grain Size Distribution τ c = 0.045(9.81 m/s 2 )(2650-1000 kg/m 3 )(0.024 m)

HEC-RAS Model At Cross Section 1 Q = 4 ft 3 /s Distance From Left Bank (ft) Channel Forming Discharge = 4 cubic Feet per Second Frequency =??

What was the discharge of this flow? Photo Credits: Teri Lindaur

Elevation in Feet Surveyed High Water Mark Using Flood Debris Indicators 4938 Red Canyon Wash Long Profile With High Water Mark 4936 4934 4932 4930 4928 4926 Red Canyon Wash Thalweg REW LEW Energy Gradient (Slope) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Dis tance Downstream in Feet y = -0.0261x + 4935.3 R² = 0.9846 Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

HEC-RAS Model At Cross Section 1 Flood Debris Q = 200 ft 3 /s Distance From Left Bank (ft) Discharge of Flood on August 16, 2010 200 cubic feet per second

Photo Credits: Greg Indivero

Video Credits: Teri Lindaur

How often do these types of flows occur? Speculation Historical Events (September 7, 1978 2,890 cfs) Photo Credits: Jim Johnson

A Big Thank You Goes Out to the following: Dr. Gigi Richard Mrs. Teri Lindaur Mr. Con Trumbull Ms. HeidlHausner Mr. Frank Jacobs

Arcement, G. J., 1989, Guide for selecting Manning's roughness co-efficients for natural channels and flood plain, USGS water-supply paper: 2339, v. 38. Cooke, R., Warren, A., Goudie, A., 1993, Desert Geomorphology: University College London, UCL Press Limited, p. 143-167. Becker, A., DiPema, L, Ladig, K, Wellik, J, and Richard, G., 2007, Channel morphology and channel- forming discharge of No Thoroughfare Canyon, Colorado, Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 306 Elliott, J.G. and Hammack, L.A., 2000, Entrainment of Riparian Gravel and Cobbles in an Alluvial Reach of a Regulated Canyon River: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, v. 16, p. 37-50. Knighton, D., 1998, Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. London: Arnold, p. 383 Richard, G.A., 2004, Flash Flooding at the Colorado National Monument 1921-2003: Colorado National Monument, National Park Service, p. 21 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2010, HEC-RAS River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA, 417 pp. Van Steeter, M. M., and J. Pitlick. 1998, Geomorphology and endangered fish habitats of the upper Colorado River: historic changes in streamflow, sediment load, and channel morphology. Water Resources Research 34:303-316. Wilcock, P. R., 2001, Toward a practical method for estimating sediment transport rates in gravel-bed rivers, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 26, 1395 1408. Wilcock, P. R., Pitlick, J., Cui, Y., 2009, Sediment Transport Primer: Estimating Bed-Material Transport in Gravel-bed Rivers, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 78 pp.