Appendix K Design Examples

Similar documents
Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by:

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

NCHRP Project High Performance/High-Strength Lightweight Concrete for Bridge Girders and Decks

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating

Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information

Anchor Bolt Design (Per ACI and "Design of Reinforcement in Concrete Pedestals" CSA Today, Vol III, No. 12)

Serviceability Deflection calculation

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

Design 1 Calculations

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

DIAGONAL TENSION RC BEAM without SHEAR REINFORCEMENT RC BEAM with WEB REINFORCEMENT KCI CODE PROVISION. ALTERNATIVE MODELS for SHEAR ANALYSIS

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Why are We Here? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Metal Pipe Section 12.7 Concrete Pipe Section Plastic Pipe Section 12.12

Moment Redistribution

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12" top flange, therefore take 4" from CL Gird.

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements

Crack Control for Ledges in Inverted T Bent Caps

Beam Design and Deflections

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary

Reliability analysis of a reinforced concrete deck slab supported on steel girders

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

Design of RC Retaining Walls

SHEAR RESISTANCE BETWEEN CONCRETE-CONCRETE SURFACES

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Bending and Shear in Beams

APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES 0.6-IN. STRAND G-1

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Many reinforced concrete structures, such as bridges,

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel

AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS

MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

Connections in Precast Concrete Structures Strength of Corbels

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

Entrance exam Master Course

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Column Design. Columns Axial Load and Bending

Crack Width Prediction for Interior Portion of Inverted 'T' Bent Caps

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Finite Element Modeling of the Load Transfer Mechanism in Adjacent Prestressed. Concrete Box-Beams. a thesis presented to.

Example: 5-panel parallel-chord truss. 8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F yield = 36 ksi F tension = 21 ksi F comp. = 10 ksi. 6 ft.

Transcription:

Appendix K Design Examples

Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below. Effective Width = 96 * Based on an example prepared as part of Training Classes on AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications, ODOT, R.A. Miller K-1

Redesign by using A1035 bars with = 100 ksi. A 3,483(12) = 0.90A s (100) 58.25 s (100) 1.7(7.0)(26) ; A = s 8.36in2 Provide 28 # 5 bars (14 on the top with 2.5 cover and 14 on the bottom with 2 5/8 cover). The bars will be at 8 o.c. Note: A1035 bars are not epoxy coated; hence, the cover is 2.5. The centroid of the bars from the top is 14 (2.5 + 0.5 5 / 8) + 14(8.5 (2 + 5 / 8 + 0.5 5 / 8)) x = = 4.12" 28 Crack control reinforcement: γ e = 0.75 f s =Tensile stress in steel reinforcement at the service limit state. d = 62.5 4.12 = 58.4" ρ = A s bd = 28 0.31 (26)(58.4) = 0.0057 k = 2ρn + (ρn) 2 ρn = 2(0.0057)(5.718) + (0.0057 5.718) 2 0.0057 5.718 = 0.225 j = 1 k / 3 = 1 0.225 / 3 = 0.925 f s = M sl A s jd = 2,141(12) = 56.6ksi 60ksi 28 0.31(0.925 58.4) f s = 56.6ksi s 700γ e 700 0.75 2d β s f c = 2 2.81 = 3.07" s 1.067 56.6 This spacing is too small. Aim for 6 spacing, which is more realistic. Try: 17 top bars: # 5 @ 12 alternating with # 6 @ 12 17 bottom bars: # 5 @ 12 alternating with # 6 @ 12 K-2

Distances to centroid of bars: (2.5 + 0.5 5 / 8) + (2.5 + 0.5 3 / 4) Top Bars: = 2.84" 2 (8.5 (2 + 5 / 8 + 0.5 5 / 8)) + (8.5 (2 + 5 / 8 + 0.5 3 / 4)) Bottom Bars: = 5.53" 2 17 2.84 + 17 5.53 x = = 4.19" 34 >6 O.K. (b) Shear Reinforcement If prestressing steel is ignored, #4 A615 stirrups @ 4 o.c. will be needed. Redesign by using A1035 U shaped # 4 stirrups. s = A f d cotθ v y v 0.4(100)(55.63)cot 45 = = 7.8" Controls, say 7 V s 284.6 5.8.2.5 5.8.2.9 Note that s < 74 ; hence, the simplified procedure with β = 2 and θ = 45 o may be used. 5.8.2.7 Provide A1035 U shaped #4 stirrups @ 7 o.c. K-3

Interface Shear Reinforcement Factored horizontal shear, V u = 323 kips V n = ca cv + µ[a vf + P c ]; c = 0.28; µ = 1.0 Although shear reinforcement spacing was previously calculated to be 7 o.c., calculate the spacing of A1035 interface shear reinforcement with limited to 60 ksi. ( ) ( ) V u = φv ni = φ ca cv + µ A vf + P c ; 323 = 0.9 0.28(20 s) + 1.0 0.4 100 + 0 ; s = 57" Say 55 5.8.4.1-2 & 5.8.4.1-3 V n max of 0.2 f ' c A cv = 0.2 7(52 20) = 1456kips 0.8A cv = 0.8 7(52 20) = 5824kips Hence, V n = 323/0.9 = 359 kips as used is o.k. A vf 0.05b v 0.05 20 = = 0.017 in 2 / length 60 5.8.4.10-4 Actual A vf = 0.40 / 57 = 0.0070 in 2 / length N.G., Redcue the spacing 0.40 / s = 0.017; s = 23.5" say 23" Use #4 U shaped A1035 interface reinforcement at s = 23. From a durability point of view corrosion resistant A1035 interface shear reinforcement provides advantages. However, practical issues may arise from a placement point of view as the spacing of girder shear reinforcement and that for interface reinforcement are significantly different. K-4

Example 2* Simple Span T-Beam Cross Section Elevation The reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below. The stirrups are symmetrically spaced at 10 o.c. up to 5 from the bearing center line and then @ 16 o.c. up to 25. * Based on an example from LRFD Design of Cast-in-Place Concrete Bridges, 1st Ed., Schneider, E.F. and Bhide, S.B. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2006, 156 pages. K-5

Redesign by using A1035 bars with a specified yield strength of 100 ksi. 1. Girder Flexure Capacity M u = 2052 k-ft. With 10 # 8 bars in 2 layers, which fit within 22, φm n = 2204 k-ft. Maximum Reinforcement Requirement ( 5.7.2.1) c = 3.04 d t 39.5 = 0.077 < 3 8 Tension controlled, O.K. O.K. Minimum Reinforcement Requirement ( 5.7.3.3.2) 1.2M cr = 1.2 (4691/12) = 469 k-ft Controls 1.33M u = 1.33 (2052) = 2729 k-ft φm n = 2204 k-ft > 1.2M cr Maximum Spacing of Tension Reinforcement ( 5.7.3.4) I g = 262874 in. 4 f c = My I 5.4.2.6: = (1336 12)(42 15.42) 262874 Hence, minimum reinforcement requirements are met. = 1.62ksi f c >80% of f r ; hence, 5.7.3.4 needs to be checked. M service = 1336 k-ft. > M cr = 391 k-ft. Use cracked transformed section properties I cr = 63200 in. 4 y - = 6.21 in. (Measured from compression face) d c = 1.5 + 0.5 + 1/ 2(1) = 2.5" f s = n My I = 60 ksi) γ e = 0.75 = 29000 (1336 12)(42 2.5 6.21) = 67.9ksi (Approximately 0.6 = 0.6 100 57 4000 63200 β s = 1+ d c 0.7(h d c ) = 1+ 2.5 0.7(42 2.5) = 1.09 s 700γ e 700 0.75 2d β s f c = 2 2.5 = 2.09" s 1.09 67.9 K-6

The actual spacing of 5 # 8 bars, in each layer, is 1+ which is not acceptable. Revise the design by using 12 # 8 bars in 2 layers. Capacity M u = 2052 k-ft. φm n = 2672 k-ft. O.K. Maximum Reinforcement Requirement ( 5.7.2.1) c = 3.64 d t 39.5 = 0.109 < 3 8 Tension controlled, O.K. Minimum Reinforcement Requirement ( 5.7.3.3.2) 1.2M cr = 1.2 (4803/12) = 480 k-ft Controls 1.33M u = 1.33 (2052) = 2729 k-ft φm n = 2672 k-ft > 1.2M cr Maximum Spacing of Tension Reinforcement ( 5.7.3.4) I g = 267731 in. 4 f c = My I 5.4.2.6: = (1336 12)(42 15.56) 267731 22 2(1.5 + 0.5) 5 1 4 Hence, minimum reinforcement requirements are met. = 1.58ksi f c >80% of f r ; hence, 5.7.3.4 needs to be checked. M service = 1336 k-ft. > M cr = 400 k-ft. Use cracked transformed section properties I cr = 74218 in. 4 y - = 6.74 in. (Measured from compression face) d c = 1.5 + 0.5 + 1/ 2(1) = 2.5" = 4.25"> 2.09, f s = n My I = 60 ksi) = 29000 (1336 12)(42 2.5 6.74) = 56.9ksi (Approximately 0.6 = 0.6 100 57 4000 74218 γ e = 0.75 β s = 1+ d c 0.7(h d c ) = 1+ 2.5 0.7(42 2.5) = 1.09 K-7

s 700γ e 700 0.75 2d β s f c = 2 2.5 = 3.46" s 1.09 56.9 The actual spacing of 12 # 8 bars, in each layer, is 1+ which is acceptable. Skin Reinforcement ( 5.7.3.4) 22 2(1.5 + 0.5) 6 1 5 = 3.4"< 3.46, d e = 39.6 > 36 ; skin reinforcement needs to be provided. However, for consistency with the original example, skin reinforcement is not provided in the redesign with A1035 reinforcing bars. Fatigue Limit State M f = 278 k-ft Cracked transformed section properties: I cr = 74218 in. 4 and y - = 6.74 in. f s = n My (278 12)(42 2.5 6.74) = 8 = 11.8ksi I cr 74218 f min = stress under dead load moment, which is 597 k-ft. > M cr = 400 k-ft. f min = n My (597 12)(42 2.5 6.74) = 8 = 25.3ksi I cr 74218 f f = 21 0.33 f min + 8(r / h) = 21 0.33 25.3 + 8 0.3 = 15.1ksi 11.8 ksi < 15.1 ksi O.K. Summary: From a strength point of view, 10 #8 A1035 bars (A s = 7.9 in. 2 ) provide adequate flexural capacity. However, the requirements related to spacing of mild reinforcement ( 5.7.3.4) result in additional area of steel. The use of A1035 bars as flexural reinforcement saves about 49% in terms of the amount of steel (10 #11 A615 (A s = 18.72 in. 2 ) vs. 12 #8 A1035 (A s = 9.48 in. 2 )). Girder Shear h 42.0 in. d s = d e 38.5 in. a 3.09 in. d v =d s -a/2 37.0 in. 0.72h 30.2 in. 0.9d e 34.7 in. Final d v 37.0 in. K-8

Assume 1-4 wide support. The critical section is at x = 37 + 8 =45 =3.75 Use U shaped # 4 A1035 stirrups Distance (ft.) Point along span V u x x/l kips 0 0 189 0.67 0.0134 185 3.75 0.07 168 5 0.1 160 10 0.2 132 15 0.3 103 20 0.4 75 25 0.5 46 A v s max = 0.0316 f ' c b v A v 0.4 in. 2 f' c 4 ksi 100 ksi b v 22 in. s max 28.8 in. The simplified procedure for the determination of β and θ may be used if the spacing of the stirrups does not exceed s max = 28.8 in. For the simplified procedure β = 2.0 and θ = 45 o. Distance (ft.) v u Is v u <0.125f' c? s max (in.) x ksi 0 0.258 Yes 24 0.67 0.253 Yes 24 3.75 0.229 Yes 24 5 0.219 Yes 24 10 0.180 Yes 24 15 0.141 Yes 24 20 0.102 Yes 24 25 0.063 Yes 24 The maximum shear resistance, V n, is given by the lesser of V n =V c +V s +V p and V n =0.25f c b v d v. V n =0.25f c b v d v = 0.25(4)(22)(37) = 814 kips K-9

V u @ the critical section = 168 <φv n = 0.9(814) = 733 kips V c = 0.0316β f ' c b v d v = 0.0316(2) 4(22)(37) = 103kips At the critical section, V u = 168 kips V u = φ(v c + V p + V s ) 168 = 0.9 103 + 0 + A f d v y v = 0.9 103 + 0 + s 0.4 100 37 s ; s = 17.69" Stirrup layout (symmetrically placed) of U-shaped #4 A1035 stirrups: - Start the first stirrup at 9 from the support. - Provide 3 spaces @ 17 o.c. - Provide 10 spaces @ 24 o.c. Tensile Capacity of Longitudinal Reinforcement ( 5.8.3.5) The following equation needs to be satisfied. 5.8.3.5-1 For this case, the above equation is simplified to (i) Critical Section M u = 633 k-ft & V u = 168 kips For # 4 stirrups @ 17 o.c., V s = A f d v y v 0.4 100 37 = = 87.1kips s 17 V s in Eq. 5.8.3.5-1 cannot be V u /φ = 168/0.9 = 187 kips Hence, use V s = 87.1 kips. T = M u φd v + V u φ 0.5V 633 12 s cotθ = 0.9 37 + 168 0.9 0.5 87.1 cot(45) = 371kips l db = max( 1.25A f b y 1.25 0.60 100,0.4d b ) = max(,0.4 0.875 100) = 37.5" f ' c 4 No modification factors are necessary; hence, l d = l db = 37.5" > 12" l d = 38" As seen below, the available distance to develop the bar is 55, which is larger than l d = 38". Therefore, f sx = K-10

T provided = A s = (16 0.79)100 = 1264kips > T = 371kips O.K. (ii) Midspan M u = 2052 k-ft and V u = 46 kips For # 4 stirrups @ 24 o.c., V s = A f d v y v 0.4 100 37 = = 61.7kips s 24 V s in Eq. 5.8.3.5-1 cannot be taken greater than V u /φ = 46/0.9 = 51 kips; hence, use V s = 51 kips. T = M V u + u φd v φ 0.5V 2052 12 s cotθ = 0.9 37 + 46 0.9 0.5 51 cot(45) = 765kips At midspan, there is no concern about development length; hence, f sx =. T provided = A s = (16 0.79)100 = 1264kips > T = 765kips O.K. (iii) Face of Bearing M u = 0 and V u = 168 kips (Note: V u is taken as the shear at d v from the face of support.) For # 4 stirrups @ 17 o.c., V s = A f d v y v 0.4 100 37 = = 87.1kips s 17 V s in Eq. 5.8.3.5-1 cannot be taken greater than V u /φ = 168/0.9 = 187 kips; hence, use V s = 87.1 kips. T = M u φd v + V u φ 0.5V s cotθ = 0 + 168 0.9 0.5 87.1 cot(45) = 143kips K-11

l d = 38" As seen below, the available distance to develop the bar is 21. f sx = l d,available l d = 21 38 100 = 55.2ksi T provided = A s f sx = (16 0.79)55.2 = 698kips > T = 143kips O.K. K-12