Intercomparison of JAERI Torso Phantom lung sets

Similar documents
The FastScan whole body counter: efficiency as a function of BOMAB phantom size and energy modelled by MCNP

Investigation of Uncertainty Sources in the Determination of Gamma Emitting Radionuclides in the WBC

IAEA-TECDOC-1334 Intercalibration of in vivo counting systems using an Asian phantom

Sensitivity of the IRD whole-body counter for in vivo measurements in the case of accidental intakes

CURRENT CAPABILITIES OF THE IRD-CNEN WHOLE BODY COUNTER FOR IN VIVO MONITORING OF INTERNALLY DEPOSITED RADIONUCLIDES IN HUMAN BODY

A New Anthropometric Calibration Phantom for In Vivo Measurement of Bone Seeking Radionuclides

JRPR. An Intercomparison of Counting Efficiency and the Performance of Two Whole-Body Counters According to the Type of Phantom.

Am-241 as a Metabolic Tracer for Inhaled Pu Nitrate in External Chest Counting

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ITWG GUIDELINE ON LABORATORY APPLICATIONS OF HIGH-RESOLUTION GAMMA SPECTROMETRY

MEASUREMENT OF SPENT FUEL ASSEMBLIES IN SPRR-300

Volume 1 No. 4, October 2011 ISSN International Journal of Science and Technology IJST Journal. All rights reserved

Enriched Uranium Waste Assay at AWE

Design of a virtual model of a hand-held Germanium detector and a voxelized ICRP whole body phantom: A Monte Carlo study

Renewed whole-body counting chamber in STUK

Seaborg s Plutonium?

Detection efficiency of a BEGe detector using the Monte Carlo method and a comparison to other calibration methods. Abstract

Use of phoswich detector for simultaneous monitoring of high energy photon and its applications in in vivo lung counting

Gamma-Spectrum Generator

1 cm. Cu electrode. Ge crystal. end cap. Dead layer. crystal cup

Monitoring Intakes of Pu/Am by External Counting: Current Status in India

FRAM V5.2. Plutonium and Uranium Isotopic Analysis Software

The Validation of New Biokinetic Models of Thorium & Uranium using Excretion Data on Occupational Workers

Quartz-Crystal Spectrometer for the Analysis of Plutonium K X-Rays

Library of uranium and plutonium reference spectra Introduction

TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP ITWG GUIDELINE ON IN-FIELD APPLICATIONS OF HIGH- RESOLUTION GAMMA SPECTROMETRY FOR ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL

69 Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 112, No. 1 ª Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Establishing an ISO-CART Measurement Station to Meet Government Burial Regulations for Radioactive Material

Analysis of natural radioactivity and artificial radionuclides in soil samples in the Najran region of Saudi Arabia

Applications of MCBEND

Neutron Dose near Spent Nuclear Fuel and HAW after the 2007 ICRP Recommendations

Ringhals AB. Routines for whole body counting at Ringhals NPP

K 40 activity and Detector Efficiency

A Germanium Detector with Optimized Compton Veto for High Sensitivity at Low Energy

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO/IEC Annex. Ionising radiation measurements

WM2018 Conference, March 18-22, 2018, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. PVT and LaBr3(Ce)-based Radon Express Analyzers 18164

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Interactive Web Accessible Gamma-Spectrum Generator & EasyMonteCarlo Tools

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

Introduction to gamma spectroscopy on a budget. Daniel Emes SA Radiation

AUTOMATIC AND INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR BETA- GAMMA COINCIDENCE SYSTEMS USED IN CTBT MONITORING

Results of the 2015 national indoor radon intercomparison measurements in Serbia

Background Reduction Using Collimators on a Portable HPGe Nuclide Identifier

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v2 21 Jul 2005

Measurement of Gamma Emitting Radionuclides in Environmental Samples of Talagang Tehsil-District Chakwal

Performance Characterization of A New Cam System M.J. Koskelo 1, J.C. Rodgers 2, D.C. Nelson 2, A.R. McFarland 3 and C.A. Ortiz 3

VALIDATION OF IQ3 MEASUREMENTS FOR HIGH-DENSITY LOW-ENRICHED-URANIUM WASTE DRUMS AT PELINDABA

Portal Monitor Characterization for Internally and Externally Deposited Radionuclides

Characterization Survey Techniques and Some Practical Feedback

European Project Metrology for Radioactive Waste Management

QUALIFYING THE ZEUS SYSTEM FOR VERIFICATION OF GIC ROOM TRASH FROM RADIATION CONTROLLED AREAS AT LANL. S. C. Myers Los Alamos National Laboratory

The Efficiency Characterization of Germanium Detectors at Energies less than 45 kev

IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF RADIONUCLIDES IN HISTORICAL WASTE AT ANSTO

Simulation of Personal Protective Equipment Exposure to Radioactive Particulates. A Master s Level Submission.

Applied Nuclear Science Educational, Training & Simulation Systems

DETERMINATION OF CORRECTION FACTORS RELATED TO THE MANGANESE SULPHATE BATH TECHNIQUE

A. Faanu *, G. Emi-Reynolds, E. O. Darko, R. Awudu, E.T. Glover, O. K. Adukpo, F. 1

LAGUNA VERDE NPP DAW DRUMS CLASSIFICATION

Measurement of Specific Activities of Some Biological Samples for Some Iraq Governorates

Calibration of a Whole Body Counter and In Vivo measurements for Internal Dosimetry Evaluation in Chile, Two years experience.

Neutron and/or photon response of a TLD-albedo personal dosemeter on an ISO slab phantom

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

Indian J.Sci.Res.2(3) :25-32, 2011

TRAINING IN EXTERNAL DOSIMETRY CALCULATIONS WITH COMPUTATIONAL CODES

Evaluation of Nondestructive Assay Characterization Methods for Pipe- Over-Pack Containers

Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Formulation and Strategy. 13 November 2008 Alan DuSautoy

UNCORRECTED PROOF. Table of Contents

Natural Radiation Map of the Sudan

Michael G. Stabin. Radiation Protection and Dosimetry. An Introduction to Health Physics. 4) Springer

Digital simulation of neutron and gamma measurement devices

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Alpha spectrometry systems. A users perspective. George Ham. 26 th May Date Month Year

Minimum Detectable and Maximum Missable Activities

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

Uncertainty and detection limit in decontamination measurements of gamma emitting radio nuclides in unshielded environments Tom Koivuhuhta

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Limited. Clearance and exemption

Compton Camera. Compton Camera

Basic hands-on gamma calibration for low activity environmental levels

Comparison of Several Detector Technologies for Measurement of Special Nuclear Materials i

The Best Gamma-Ray Detector

Comparison of the air kerma standards for 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma-ray beams between the IAEA and the NIST. Ronaldo Minniti 1 and Ladislav Czap 2

Monte Carlo Simulation concerning Particle Therapy

A Comparison of True Alpha Activities in Air Filter Samples with Values Obtained from Radioactivity-in-air Monitors

Investigation of Uncertainty Sources in the Determination of Gamma Emitting Radionuclides in the UAL

Application of Spectral Summing to Indeterminate Suspect Low-Level Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

The IAEA-CU world wide open proficiency test on the determination of radionuclides in soil, spinach and water

Development of a Dosimetric System using Spectrometric Technique suitable for Operational Radiation Dose Measurements and Evaluation

Distinguishing fissions of 232 Th, 237 Np and 238 U with beta-delayed gamma rays

A Prototype of LaBr3:Ce in situ Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Marine Environmental Monitoring

Prompt gamma measurements for the verification of dose deposition in proton therapy. Contents. Two Proton Beam Facilities for Therapy and Research

K 40 activity and Detector Efficiency

Verification of fissile materials

EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION STUDIES FOR GAMMA SPECTROMETRIC SYSTEMS: THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT PARAMETERS

Radiological Traceability Program (RTP) Radiological and Environmental Science Laboratory (RESL) Svetlana Nour Kenneth Inn Jerry LaRosa Jackie Mann

Canadian Journal of Physics. Determination of Radioactivity Levels of Salt Minerals on the Market

Neutron induced reaction and neutron sources

ISOCS / LabSOCS. Calibration software for Gamma Spectroscopy

Activities of the neutron standardization. at the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)

Fast-Neutron Production via Break-Up of Deuterons and Fast-Neutron Dosimetry

ETNA (Efficiency Transfer for Nuclide Activity measurement)

Transcription:

Intercomparison of JAERI Torso Phantom lung sets Gary H. Kramer and Barry M. Hauck Human Monitoring Laboratory, Radiation Protection Bureau, 775 Brookfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1C1 Canada (Gary_H_Kramer@hc-sc.gc.ca, www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehp/ehd/rpb/environ/ncrc/) INTRODCTION The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) sponsored a coordinated research proposal (CRP) in 1995. The CRP was to perform an international Intercomparison of In Vivo counting systems using a Reference Asian Phantom (1). The CRP featured a commercially available phantom designed at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) to represent the torso of an average Asian male. The JAERI phantom is realistic to better simulate the interaction of low energy photons (< 200 kev) with bone, cartilage, muscle and adipose tissues. The torso plate is constructed of an adipose-muscle substitute mixture and contains synthetic bone, and cartilage. The phantom core contains a full rib cage, spine and scapula in the rear of the torso. The overlay plates are constructed of different adipose-muscle substitute mixtures. The torso cavities contain lungs, heart, liver and other organs. All internal organs but the lungs are constructed of muscle substitute material; the lungs are constructed of lung substitute material. The simulated lungs provided with the phantom were replaced by lungs made specifically for the CRP using the polyurethane-based lung tissue substitute developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for use in the JAERI Phantom. Six sets of radioactively labelled lungs were provided: natural thorium (120 Bq), natural uranium (1,160 Bq), uranium with a 3% enrichment (1,550 Bq), Am (488 Bq), and two Pu sets with significantly different radioactivity contents (4,630 and 40,800 Bq). An additional blank set was provided for background measurement. The CRP had nine participants: Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, and the SA. The IAEA obtained its JAERI phantom from Kyoto Kagaku Company in 1994. The Human Monitoring Laboratory (HML), which operates the Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for In Vivo Monitoring (2), also has a JAERI phantom, which was obtained in 1995, and several lung sets. This paper describes the measurements made on the IAEA JAERI phantom with the IAEA lung sets and the lung sets made for and by the HML to assess their similarity, or differences. METHODS AND MATERIALS The JAERI Phantom and lung sets: The JAERI phantom, as supplied by the manufacturer, consists of a torso core, a chest plate cover, sliced lungs, other internal organs, and six overlay plates. The adipose content of the JAERI phantom is either 10%, 20% or 30% depending on which overlay series is used. The phantoms details are shown in Table 1. The phantom was accompanied by five lung sets that were manufactured for the IAEA by the niversity of Cincinnati. The HML also has five lung sets that were manufactured by Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) and three lung sets ( Am, 152 Eu, and -nat) made in-house as described elsewhere (3). The lung sets are summarised in Table 2. Muscle Equivalent Chest Wall Thickness (MEQ-CWT): The MEQ-CWT is the thickness of muscleequivalent-absorber that reduces the photon flux from the lungs by the same amount as the actual combination of muscle and adipose tissue in the chest plate and overlay plates. This method has been successfully used elsewhere (4). The function is shown below: MEQ CWT CWT µ adp AMF µ msc 100 µ msc (100 AMF) 100 (1) Where MEQ-CWT is the muscle equivalent chest wall thickness (mm), CWT is the chest wall thickness (mm), AMF is the adipose mass fraction, µ adp is the linear attenuation coefficient at a given energy for adipose tissue (cm -1 ), and µ msc is the linear attenuation coefficient at a given energy for muscle tissue (cm -1 ). Both µ adp and µ msc are obtained from the literature (5) by multiplying the mass attenuation coefficients by the appropriate density (adipose or muscle). The values in Table 1 were supplied by the IAEA. Germanium lung counter: The lung counting system at the HML consists of four large area germanium 1

detectors obtained from EG&G Ortec. Each detector, which is cooled by a 17 liter Dewar, is 70 mm in diameter and 30 mm thick. The beryllium entrance window is 0.5 mm thick. The detectors are housed in a counting chamber constructed of 20 cm thick low background steel. The shield s interior is covered with a lead liner approximately 0.6 cm thick. Spectra acquired from the individual Ge detectors were stored and analyzed using EG&G s GDR software custom modified for the HML. Counting Protocol: The JAERI phantom was measured with each lung set. Detector #1 was placed above the lower portion of the left lung and above the heart (lower left); detector #2 was placed above the upper portion of the left lung (upper left); detector #3 was placed above the lower portion of the right lung (lower right), and detector #4 was placed above the upper portion of the right lung (upper right). The X ray and gamma photon energies of interest were 17.1, 17.5, 20.5, 26.3, 38.7, 43.5, 45.3, 59.5, 63.3, 92.5, 121.8, 129.3, 143.8, 163.3, 185.4, 205.3, 209.4,.6, 244.7, and 344.3 kev. Each phantom was counted with the chest plate alone and with each overlay plate. Count times were long (3600 to 50,000 seconds) to obtain the best possible counting statistics within a reasonable time. There was not sufficient counting time for the Pu(low) lung set. The range of counting statistics was :-nat 0.7% to 2.2%; - enr 0.4% to 1.4%; 232 Th 1.9% to 3%; Pu(low) 3% to 5%; Pu(high) 0.6% to 1%. RESLTS AND DISCSSION The counting efficiencies for the four-detector germanium array is shown in Table 3 for lung sets measured (PNNL, HML, IAEA) as a function of energy for each overlay plate configuration. Fig. 1 show the counting efficiency as a function of energy for the JAERI torso phantom with no overlay plate. Plots for the other counting configurations follow the same trend and are not shown here. Except for the Am (59.5 kev) and occasionally one of the 232 Th (209 kev) photopeaks, the PNNL and IAEA lung sets show good agreement. The IAEA Am lung set gives a counting efficiency that appears about 25% too high for all overlay plate configurations. This was observed by other participants and no explanation has yet been found for this. It does, however, exemplify that the manufacture of tissue substitute lung sets is still something of a black art. Despite all precautions, this lung set is either inhomogeneous or has had the wrong activity added. Heterogeneity can lead to an error in the activity estimate of a factor of three (6) if the activity was severely localised due to improper mixing. A factor of 1.25, which appears to be the discrepancy, could easily be explained in this way. It will not be known for some time, however, what the true reason is as the participants are still waiting for the destructive analysis of this lung set to determine the true activity. The poor agreement of 232 Th (209 kev) may simply be due to counting statistics despite the fact that this lung set received the most count time (23,000 to 50,000 sec). The counting efficiency appears to be too low when using no overlay plate, CZ10879, 20853, 30826, and 21559. Counting efficiency values obtained with overlay plates CZ11577 and CZ31541 are in agreement with the others. An examination of the count data showed no reason why these deviations should have occurred. CZ11577 received the most counts and CZ31541 received the least counts. The kev photopeak from 232 Th gave much better agreement with the other data. The sliced lungs ( Am, 152 Eu, and -nat) manufactured by the HML are also in excellent agreement with the PNNL and IAEA lung sets. This finding is in agreement with work published elsewhere (3). The advantages of sliced lung sets and planar sources are manifold. Activity can be distributed in a known and reproducible manner to mimic either a homogeneous or heterogeneous distribution in the lung. Short lived radionuclides can be used. Cost is much less than purchasing or manufacturing lung sets that have the activity homogeneously distributed throughout the tissue substitute material. Many different sources can be used with a single lung set. Table 4 shows the averages and coefficients of variation for selected (i.e., those that had three or more values) counting efficiency data at different photon energies. The IAEA Am lung set has been eliminated as an outlier from this analysis. The coefficient of variation shows that agreement between lung sets depends on the photon energy. In general, the lower the photon energy the worse the agreement. The 17.7 and 26.4 kev photopeaks show the highest coefficients of variation. This could be due to several factors: the distribution of the radionuclide in the lung insert, the positioning of the detector, the analysis of the photo peak. In the latter case, the HML finds that the analysis software often gives poor fits to the photopeaks requiring an operator assisted analysis. Once the photon energy rises above 60 kev the coefficient of variation is always less than 6 %. This means that at the 2 level one can expect counting efficiencies derived from lung sets that have the activity homogeneously distributed through the tissue substitute material to be within 12% of each other. This range is well within the guidelines outlined in North American performance criteria (7,8). However, at lower photon energies the agreement is only to within 30%, and this may present a problem for lung intercomparison programs that use low energy emitting photons. 2

REFERENCES 1 Shirotani T. Realistic torso phantom for calibration on in vivo transuranic-nuclide counting facilities. J. Nucl. Sci. and Tech. 25(11), 875-883 (1988). 2 Kramer, G.H.; Limson Zamora, M. The Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for Bioassay and In-Vivo Monitoring: A Program Summary. Health Phys. 67(2), 192-196 (1994). 3 Kramer, G.H; Hauck, B.M; Lee, T-Y; Chang, S-Y. Comparison of sliced and whole lung sets for the LLNL and JAERI Torso Phantoms using Ge Detectors. Health Phys. 76(5), 547-552 (1999). 4 Newton D., Wells A.C, Mizushita S. Toohey R.E., Sha J.Y., Jones R., Jefferies S.J, Palmer H.E, Rieksts G., Anderson A.L, Campbell G.W. The Livermore phantom as a calibration standard in the assessment of plutonium in lungs. In: Assessment of radioactive Contamination in Man, IAEA Vienna 183-199; (1985). 5 International Commission on Radiation nits and Measurements. Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement. Bethseda: ICRP; ICRP Report 44 (1989). 6 Kramer, G.H., Burns, L.C. and Yiu, S. Lung Counting: evaluation of uncertainties in lung burden estimation arising from a heterogeneous deposition using Monte Carlo code simulations. Rad. Prot. Dosim. 74(3), 173-182 (1997). 7 Atomic Energy Control Board. Regulatory Standard: Technical and quality assurance standards for dosimetry services in Canada. Ottawa: Atomic Energy Control Board; Consultative Document S-106 (1998). 8 Health Physics Society. Performance criteria for radiobioassay. McLean: Health Physics Society; HPS N13.30-1996 (1996). 3

Table 1: The IAEA JAERI phantom s characteristics. Torso + Overlay Adipose content MEQ-CWT (cm) None 10 1.91 CZ10879 10 2.68 CZ11577 10 3.36 CZ20853 20 2.58 CZ21559 20 3.22 CZ30826 30 2.47 CZ31541 30 3.09 Table 2: Lung sets used in the intercomparison( PNNL = Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, oc = niversity of Cincinnati, HML = Human Monitoring Laboratory). Numbers in parentheses represent the percentage uncertainty on the activity. Manufacturer Nuclide Activity (Bq) Ref. Date Weight (g) oc 1158 (0.7) 53 (0.7) 18 Jul 96 977 1550 (0.7) 310 (0.7) 18 Jul 96 914 232 Th 120 (0.8) 22 Oct 96 921 Am 488 (1.0) 11 Jul 96 953 Pu 40840 (0.7) 17 Sept 96 981 PNNL Am 152 Eu 17930 (2.8) 17720 (1.1) 20 Nov 97 1115 239 Pu 75250 (2.1) 3 Mar 98 1121 Am 20200 (3.5) 4 Mar 97 1113 8677 (0.2) 401 (0.2) 4 Mar 97 1110 6800 (0.3) 4 Mar 97 1108 HML 152 Eu 43227 (1.5) 18 May 1995 807 Am 24460 (1.0) 27 June 1995 807 10090 (0.2) 467 (0.2) 12 July 1995 807 4

Table 3: Counting efficiencies (cnt/photon) of the JAERI with lung sets manufactured by PNNL, HML (sliced), and IAEA as a function of energy for no overlay, CZ10879, and CZ20853. Energy No Overlay CZ10879 CZ20853 CZ30826 CZ11577 CZ21559 CZ31541 (kev) 17.1 7.03 x 10-4 2.20 x 10-4 2.60 x 10-4 3.10 x 10-4 1.40 x 10-4 1.04 x 10-4 1.20 x 10-4 17.1 5.83 x 10-4 1.89 x 10-4 2.38 x 10-4 2.72 x 10-4 8.85 x 10-5 1.09 x 10-4 1.27 x 10-4 17.6 3.63 x 10-4 1.23 x 10-4 1.42 x 10-4 1.56 x 10-4 8.35 x 10-5 6.39 x 10-5 7.34 x 10-5 17.6 3.84 x 10-4 1.21 x 10-4 1.47 x 10-4 1.71 x 10-4 8.31 x 10-5 6.86 x 10-5 7.75 x 10-5 17.6 4.26 x 10-4 1.37 x 10-4 1.62 x 10-4 1.89 x 10-4 8.95 x 10-5 6.73 x 10-5 8.43 x 10-5 17.6 4.44 x 10-4 1.54 x 10-4 1.68 x 10-4 1.97 x 10-4 9.57 x 10-5 8.03 x 10-5 8.27 x 10-5 20.5 1.87 x 10-3 9.32 x 10-4 9.78 x 10-4 1.05 x 10-3 5.14 x 10-4 6.28 x 10-4 6.38 x 10-4 26.4 6.95 x 10-3 3.94 x 10-3 4.20 x 10-3 4.22 x 10-3 2.82 x 10-3 2.79 x 10-3 2.81 x 10-3 26.4 5.94 x 10-3 3.24 x 10-3 3.32 x 10-3 3.33 x 10-3 2.44 x 10-3 2.44 x 10-3 2.37 x 10-3 26.4 6.97 x 10-3 3.98 x 10-3 4.41 x 10-3 4.31 x 10-3 2.79 x 10-3 2.81 x 10-3 2.72 x 10-3 26.4 6.41 x 10-3 3.33 x 10-3 3.42 x 10-3 3.75 x 10-3 2.50 x 10-3 2.13 x 10-3 2.31 x 10-3 43.5 1.54 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 1.13 x 10-2 1.19 x 10-2 8.73 x 10-3 8.41 x 10-3 8.99 x 10-3 45.4 1.70 x 10-2 1.20 x 10-2 1.21 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 9.30 x 10-3 9.26 x 10-3 9.22 x 10-3 45.4 1.71 x 10-2 1.21 x 10-2 1.21 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 9.37 x 10-3 9.29 x 10-3 9.25 x 10-3 45.4 1.61 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.15 x 10-2 8.85 x 10-3 8.56 x 10-3 8.51 x 10-3 45.4 1.61 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.16 x 10-2 8.65 x 10-3 8.29 x 10-3 8.26 x 10-3 59.5 1.92 x 10-2 1.39 x 10-2 1.37 x 10-2 1.38 x 10-2 1.06 x 10-2 1.07 x 10-2 1.06 x 10-2 59.5 2.54 x 10-2 1.81 x 10-2 1.84 x 10-2 1.85 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.46 x 10-2 59.5 2.00 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.45 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.11 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.11 x 10-2 59.5 2.05 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.46 x 10-2 1.14 x 10-2 1.14 x 10-2 1.13 x 10-2 59.5 2.02 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 1.07 x 10-2 1.11 x 10-2 63.3 2.00 x 10-2 1.43 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.45 x 10-2 1.13 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 63.3 2.00 x 10-2 1.40 x 10-2 1.41 x 10-2 1.41 x 10-2 1.09 x 10-2 1.07 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 63.3 1.96 x 10-2 1.46 x 10-2 1.39 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.20 x 10-2 1.16 x 10-2 1.18 x 10-2 63.3 2.03 x 10-2 1.49 x 10-2 1.48 x 10-2 1.55 x 10-2 1.18 x 10-2 1.20 x 10-2 1.18 x 10-2 92.6 2.01 x 10-2 1.49 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.49 x 10-2 1.19 x 10-2 1.19 x 10-2 1.19 x 10-2 92.6 2.02 x 10-2 1.44 x 10-2 1.46 x 10-2 1.46 x 10-2 1.14 x 10-2 1.13 x 10-2 1.14 x 10-2 121.8 2.14 x 10-2 1.61 x 10-2 1.62 x 10-2 1.61 x 10-2 1.27 x 10-2 1.29 x 10-2 1.28 x 10-2 121.8 2.09 x 10-2 1.54 x 10-2 1.54 x 10-2 1.56 x 10-2 1.26 x 10-2 1.25 x 10-2 1.24 x 10-2 121.8 2.12 x 10-2 1.59 x 10-2 1.58 x 10-2 1.59 x 10-2 1.26 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 1.26 x 10-2 129.3 2.09 x 10-2 1.57 x 10-2 1.70 x 10-2 1.63 x 10-2 1.24 x 10-2 1.21 x 10-2 1.30 x 10-2 143.8 2.19 x 10-2 1.68 x 10-2 1.68 x 10-2 1.69 x 10-2 1.32 x 10-2 1.33 x 10-2 1.31 x 10-2 143.8 2.14 x 10-2 1.57 x 10-2 1.59 x 10-2 1.57 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 1.24 x 10-2 1.24 x 10-2 143.8 2.18 x 10-2 1.68 x 10-2 1.68 x 10-2 1.64 x 10-2 1.34 x 10-2 1.39 x 10-2 1.36 x 10-2 163.4 2.08 x 10-2 1.53 x 10-2 1.59 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.20 x 10-2 1.25 x 10-2 1.27 x 10-2 163.3 2.09 x 10-2 1.61 x 10-2 1.61 x 10-2 1.63 x 10-2 1.28 x 10-2 1.29 x 10-2 1.29 x 10-2 185.4 1.90 x 10-2 1.47 x 10-2 1.47 x 10-2 1.48 x 10-2 1.17 x 10-2 1.17 x 10-2 1.18 x 10-2 185.4 1.88 x 10-2 1.39 x 10-2 1.40 x 10-2 1.40 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 1.11 x 10-2 1.12 x 10-2 185.4 1.96 x 10-2 1.45 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.49 x 10-2 1.25 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 1.22 x 10-2 185.4 1.89 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.50 x 10-2 1.51 x 10-2 1.25 x 10-2 1.25 x 10-2 1.23 x 10-2 205.3 1.77 x 10-2 1.37 x 10-2 1.36 x 10-2 1.38 x 10-2 1.09 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 205.3 1.74 x 10-2 1.35 x 10-2 1.36 x 10-2 1.33 x 10-2 1.08 x 10-2 1.04 x 10-2 1.06 x 10-2 209.0 1.36 x 10-2 1.14 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 9.38 x 10-3 9.82 x 10-3 8.41 x 10-3 9.48 x 10-3.0 1.38 x 10-2 1.09 x 10-2 1.10 x 10-2 1.07 x 10-2 9.06 x 10-3 9.36 x 10-3 9.05 x 10-3 244.8 1.35 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 8.57 x 10-3 8.64 x 10-3 8.65 x 10-3 244.8 1.33 x 10-2 1.02 x 10-2 1.02 x 10-2 1.03 x 10-2 8.48 x 10-3 8.47 x 10-3 8.39 x 10-3 244.8 1.35 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 1.05 x 10-2 1.04 x 10-2 8.53 x 10-3 8.37 x 10-3 8.58 x 10-3 344.8 1.02 x 10-2 8.02 x 10-3 8.01 x 10-3 8.05 x 10-3 6.54 x 10-3 6.60 x 10-3 6.58 x 10-3 344.8 1.01 x 10-2 7.71 x 10-3 7.73 x 10-3 7.85 x 10-3 6.47 x 10-3 6.47 x 10-3 6.40 x 10-3 344.8 1.03 x 10-2 7.98 x 10-3 7.99 x 10-3 7.93 x 10-3 6.52 x 10-3 6.40 x 10-3 6.57 x 10-3 5

Table 4: Average values of the counting efficiency (cnt/photon) and their coefficients of variation (1 ) for selected photopeaks. Energy (kev) no overlay CZ10879 CZ20853 CZ30826 17.6 4.04 x 10-4 9.1 1.34 x 10-4 11.4 1.55 x 10-4 7.9 1.78 x 10-4 10.3 26.4 6.57 x 10-3 7.5 3.62 x 10-3 10.9 3.84 x 10-3 14.3 3.90 x 10-3 11.6 45.4 1.66 x 10-2 3.4 1.16 x 10-2 4.8 1.17 x 10-2 4.6 1.19 x 10-2 3.7 59.5 1.99 x 10-2 2.8 1.42 x 10-2 1.4 1.42 x 10-2 2.6 1.43 x 10-2 2.4 63.3 2.00 x 10-2 1.5 1.45 x 10-2 2.8 1.43 x 10-2 2.6 1.48 x 10-2 4.2 121.8 2.12 x 10-2 1.3 1.58 x 10-2 2.2 1.58 x 10-2 2.4 1.59 x 10-2 1.6 143.8 2.17 x 10-2 1.3 1.64 x 10-2 4.0 1.65 x 10-2 3.1 1.63 x 10-2 3.6 185.4 1.91 x 10-2 2.0 1.45 x 10-2 3.1 1.47 x 10-2 3.1 1.47 x 10-2 3.2 244.8 1.34 x 10-2 1.1 1.04 x 10-2 1.8 1.04 x 10-2 1.8 1.04 x 10-2 1.2 344.8 1.02 x 10-2 0.9 7.90 x 10-3 2.1 7.91 x 10-3 2.0 7.95 x 10-3 1.2 CZ11577 CZ21559 CZ31541 17.6 8.79 x 10-5 6.8 7.00 x 10-5 10.2 7.94 x 10-5 6.3 26.4 2.64 x 10-3 7.5 2.54 x 10-3 12.6 2.55 x 10-3 9.8 45.4 9.04 x 10-3 3.9 8.85 x 10-3 5.7 8.81 x 10-3 5.7 59.5 1.10 x 10-2 3.0 1.10 x 10-2 3.1 1.10 x 10-2 2.7 63.3 1.15 x 10-2 4.5 1.14 x 10-2 4.7 1.14 x 10-2 3.7 121.8 1.26 x 10-2 0.8 1.26 x 10-2 2.2 1.26 x 10-2 1.5 143.8 1.30 x 10-2 4.7 1.32 x 10-2 5.7 1.30 x 10-2 4.5 185.4 1.20 x 10-2 5.4 1.19 x 10-2 5.3 1.19 x 10-2 4.2 244.8 8.53 x 10-3 0.5 8.49 x 10-3 1.6 8.54 x 10-3 1.6 344.8 6.51 x 10-3 0.6 6.49 x 10-3 1.6 6.52 x 10-3 1.5 6

Fig. 1 Counting efficiency of the JAERI phantom with PNNL, HML, and IAEA lung sets as a function of energy using no overlay plate. 7