Why does my soil moisture sensor read negative? Improving accuracy of dielectric soil moisture sensors

Similar documents
Why does my soil moisture sensor read negative? Improving accuracy of dielectric soil moisture sensors

Soil Water Content & Soil Water Potential

Theoretical Aspects on Measuring Moisture Using TRIME

VIBRATION-INDUCED CONDUCTIVITY FLUCTUATION (VICOF) TESTING OF SOILS *

5TE. Water Content, EC and Temperature Sensors. Operator s Manual

THESIS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS AND CALIBRATIONS OF SOIL WATER CONTENT/POTENTIAL SENSORS FOR AGRICULTURAL SOILS IN EASTERN COLORADO.

2. RESPONSIBILITIES AND QUALIFICATIONS

Chapter 11: WinTDR Algorithms

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 70 DENSITY AND VOLUMETRIC WATER CONTENT BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

Calibration of Capacitance Sensors for Use in Nonisothermal Applications

Dielectric mixing model for the estimation of complex permittivity of wet soils at C and X band microwave frequencies

Soil Mechanics III. SOIL COMPOSITION WEIGHT-VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS

Asst. L.Musaab.S.A. ch.2 Soil Aggregate Basic Relationships (composition of soil terminology and definitions) 2.1Composition of soil

Environment Protection Engineering SENSITIVITY RANGE DETERMINATION OF SURFACE TDR PROBES

ECH 2 O-TE/EC-TM. Water Content, EC and Temperature Sensors. Operator s Manual Version 5

Empirical two-point A-mixing model for calibrating the ECH 2 O EC-5 soil moisture sensor in sands

GLG 471; MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR R.L. VAN DAM PROJECT: ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY

Agry 465 Exam October 18, 2006 (100 points) (9 pages)

1. Water in Soils: Infiltration and Redistribution

MEASURING SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT AND SNOW DENSITY USING TDR MINI-PROBES

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

Calibration of Diviner capacitance probe in two soils of Piaui State, Brazil

Site Characterization & Hydrogeophysics

Workshop on Understanding and Evaluating Radioanalytical Measurement Uncertainty November 2007

OHD L-14 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

GLACIOLOGY LAB SNOW Introduction Equipment

A New Soil Water Content Sensor with Temperature Compensation Design

3. PREPARATION OF A STANDARD SOLUTIONS. Preparation of a standard solution from crystalline salt

Capacitance Level Measurement Electronic Inserts EC 37 Z, EC 47 Z

Chapter 4 Influences of Compositional, Structural and Environmental Factors on. Soil EM Properties

User Manual for the. WET Sensor. type WET-2. Version 1.3. Delta-T Devices Ltd

The Uncertainty of a Waterdraw Calibration vs. Gravimetric Calibration on Small Volume Provers

Corn Sugar (crude & refined) Analysis F MOISTURE (Karl Fischer)

Hydrological geophysical relationships

DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF POROUS ROCKS WITH AN APPLICATION TO SEA ICE BY LARS BACKSTROM

SASKATCHEWAN STRATIGRAPHY GLACIAL EXAMPLE BOULDERS IN GLACIAL DEPOSITS

Developing New Electrical Conductivity Technique for Measuring Soil Bulk Density

2. MASS AND VOLUME MEASUREMENTS Mass measurement Analytical and standard laboratory balances Pre-lab Exercises

Chapter 1 Introduction

High Frequency Dielectric Strength Tests

Effect of gaps around a TDR probe on water content measurement: Experimental verification of analytical and numerical solutions

CHEM 334 Quantitative Analysis Laboratory

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials

Automatic Gamma-Ray Equipment for Multiple Soil Physical Properties Measurements

Liquid Feed Injection in a High Density Riser

A Review on Microwave Based Moisture Measurement System for Granular Materials

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

9 Sampling. Safety. Sample References. Size of Original Samples. Sample Types

POWER UNDERSTANDING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN DP FLOW DEVICES

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

CHAPTER VI EFFECT OF SALINITY ON DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF SOILS

Fig.8-1 Scheme of the fluidization column

Citric Acid Analysis L-6-1. MOISTURE (Karl Fischer)

CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUID WATER CONTENT AND DENSITY IN SNOW USING TDR

Assistant Prof., Department of Civil Engineering Bhagwant University,Ajmer,Rajasthan,India ABSTRACT

METHOD 9040B. ph ELECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENT

Research Article Correcting Inaccurately Recorded Data due to Faulty Calibration of a Capacitance Water Content Probe

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

SPECIFICATION SHEET : FHS2-UNV-36L

CALIBRATION OF A TDR INSTRUMENT FOR SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF SOIL WATER AND SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY

Unsaturated Flow (brief lecture)

SPECIFICATION SHEET : FHS2-UNV-36L

Structural Engineering Research Group (SERG) April 10, 2013 Dielectric Modeling of Hydrated Cement Paste Panels

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing

Basic Aggregates Study Guide

MS20 Laboratory Seawater Salinity and Density

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

6 th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

2. Modeling of shrinkage during first drying period

Thermal and moisture characteristics of Takamatsuzuka tumulus mound and its cooling

This Specification is for the supply of sands, crushed rock and crushed scoria to Melbourne Water work sites.

2. Irrigation. Key words: right amount at right time What if it s too little too late? Too much too often?

Evaluation of Capacitance in Motor Circuit Analysis Findings. Howard W Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP President, SUCCESS by DESIGN

The Role of Well Logging in Coal-Bed Methane Extraction

Contents. 1. Evaporation

Author(s) Affiliation

The Effects of Different Surcharge Pressures on 3-D Consolidation of Soil

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

The response of ground penetrating radar (GPR) to changes in temperature and moisture condition of pavement materials

Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

A Method, tor Determining the Slope. or Neutron Moisture Meter Calibration Curves. James E. Douglass

pifreeze A Freeze / Thaw Plug-in for FEFLOW User Guide

THE SAMPLE AREA OF TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY PROBES IN PROXIMITY TO SHARP DIELECTRIC PERMITTIVITY BOUNDARIES

Prediction of soil effects on GPR signatures

A look into Gassmann s Equation

EXPERIMENT 1 Chemistry 110 LABORATORY SAFETY

SMEX04 Soil Moisture Network Data: Sonora

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL PREPARATION

REPORT ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TRENCHING INTHE ROAD RESERVE OF THE ROAD BETWEEN BEAUFORT WEST AND CARNAVON.

EVALUATION OF VACUUM DRYING FOR DETERMINATION OF BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF HMA SAMPLES

Spatial Time Domain Reflectometry for Monitoring Transient Soil Moisture Profiles Applications of the Soil Moisture Group, Univ.

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

The Effect of Clay Content and Iron Oxyhydroxide Coatings on the Dielectric Properties of Quartz Sand. Michael V. Cangialosi

The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally

H + [ ] [ ] H + NH 3 NH 4. = poh + log HB +

Micro Volume QuEChERS kit

GAW - WCCAP recommendation for aerosol inlets and sampling tubes

Transcription:

Why does my soil moisture sensor read negative? Improving accuracy of dielectric soil moisture sensors Douglas R. Cobos, Ph.D. Decagon Devices and Washington State University

Outline Introduction VWC definition Direct vs. indirect measurement methods Dielectric permittivity for measuring VWC Accuracy Definitions and scope Approach to accuracy analysis (mixing model) Sensor (dielectric permittivity) accuracy Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Installation quality and techniques

Volumetric water content Air Water 0.15 m 3 0.35 m 3 Volumetric Water Content (VWC): Symbol q V water /V soil Soil minerals 0.50 m 3 q = 0.35 m 3 water / 1 m 3 total soil volume = 0.35 m 3/ m 3 or 35% VWC 3

Measurement techniques Direct measurements Directly measure the property e.g. length with calipers Indirect measurements Measure another property and relate it to the property of interest through a calibration e.g. expansion of liquid in a tube to determine temperature 4

Direct measurement of VWC Volumetric water content (θ) Obtain moist soil sample with known volume Weigh moist sample Dry sample at 105 o C for 24 h Weigh dry sample q M M moist V sample dry 5

Dielectric theory: How it works In a heterogeneous medium: Volume fraction of any constituent affects total (bulk) dielectric permittivity Changing any constituent volume changes the total dielectric Material Dielectric Permittivity Air 1 Soil Minerals 3-16 Organic Matter 2-5 Ice 5 Water 80 Changes in water volume have the most significant effect on the total dielectric 6

Relating dielectric permittivity to VWC Volumetric water content 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Topp eqn. y = 4.30E-06x 3-5.50E-04x 2 + 2.92E-02x - 5.30E-02 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Dielectric permittivity

Outline Introduction VWC definition Direct vs. indirect measurement methods Dielectric permittivity for measuring VWC Accuracy Definitions and scope Approach to accuracy analysis (mixing model) Sensor (dielectric permittivity) accuracy Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Installation quality and techniques

Accuracy Resolution - The smallest change that can be detected Precision - The degree of reproducibility of measurement Accuracy - How close the measured value is to the actual (absolute) value 9

Accuracy (of what measurement?) What does it mean? Dielectric permittivity accuracy? VWC accuracy Questions: Why might a sensor read a negative VWC? Can a sensor really have 1-2% VWC accuracy for all soils? 10

Approach to accuracy analysis Use generalized dielectric mixing model Set default mixing model parameters to realistic values Vary model parameters over normal values and see how they affect measured VWC

Generalized dielectric mixing model e b a = x a e a a + x m e m a +qe w a is the apparent dielectric permittivity. x is the volume fraction. The subscripts b, a, m, and w refer to bulk, air, mineral and water 12

Generalized dielectric mixing model By rearranging, we can get an equation relating θ to: ε b Bulk soil permittivity (sensor accuracy) ρ b Bulk density of soil ε m Permittivity of minerals ρ s Particle density ε w Permittivity of water q = e b a + (1-e m a ) r b r s -1 e w a -1 13

Mixing model default parameters Mixing model parameter Value α 0.65 air 1 mineral 4 water 78.5 ρ b 1.4 g/cm 3 ρ mineral 2.65 g/cm 3

Factors affecting VWC accuracy 1. Sensor s ability to measure dielectric permittivity accurately (sensor accuracy) 2. Relationship between dielectric permittivity and VWC 3. Installation quality 15

Outline Introduction VWC definition Direct vs. indirect measurement methods Dielectric permittivity for measuring VWC Accuracy Definitions and scope Approach to accuracy analysis (mixing model) Sensor (dielectric permittivity) accuracy Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Installation quality and techniques

Sensor accuracy Accuracy with which sensor measures dielectric permittivity This is the ONLY specification that the sensor manufacturer can give 17

Sensor accuracy: Sensor-sensor repeatability Manufacturer must control processes so that all sensors read the same EC-5 Some sensors are calibrated against dielectric permittivity standards to improve repeatability Calibration drives up cost 5TE, 5TM, 10TM, GS3, RS3 18

Sensor Accuracy: Electrical conductivity (salt) effects Depends on the ability of the sensor to separate real (capacitive) and imaginary (conductive) components of dielectric permittivity Low frequency sensors, such as the discontinued EC-10 and EC-20 (5 MHz) have high sensitivity to salts With new higher frequency sensors (70-100 MHz), effects are small except in saline soils 19

Sensor Accuracy: Temperature effects Sensor electronics must have negligible inherent temperature sensitivity Permittivity of water is temperature dependent (negative correlation) Electrical conductivity of soil solution is highly temperature dependent (positive correlation) Impossible to compensate in electronics Must do correction during data analysis 20

Sensor ( ) accuracy effect on θ meas accuracy Sensor accuracy spec for Decagon sensors: ±1 (unitless) from = 1 to 40 Resulting error ±0.03 m 3 /m 3 at dry end to ±0.01 m 3 /m 3 at wet end Mixing model parameter Value α 0.65 air 1 mineral 4 water 78.5 ρ b 1.4 g/cm 3 ρ mineral 2.65 g/cm 3

Outline Introduction VWC definition Direct vs. indirect measurement methods Dielectric permittivity for measuring VWC Accuracy Definitions and scope Approach to accuracy analysis (mixing model) Sensor (dielectric permittivity) accuracy Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Installation quality and techniques

Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Commonly called a calibration equation Each soil has a different relationship Most mineral soils have similar relationship Relationship generally determined empirically Topp equation used extensively Sensor manufacturer cannot control or specify this relationship 23

Errors from ε to θ meas conversion Effect of bulk density on accuracy Bulk density of soils varies widely Agricultural soils can range from 0.8 to 1.8 g/cm 3 This represents ±2% VWC error In organic, volcanic, or compacted soils the error can be much larger Mixing model parameter Value α 0.65 air 1 mineral 4 water 78.5 ρ b 0.8 to 1.8 g/cm 3 24 ρ mineral 2.65 g/cm 3

Errors from ε to θ meas conversion Effect of mineral permittivity on accuracy Dielectric permittivity of minerals typically 3-7 This represents ±2.5% VWC error Titanium minerals can have permittivity of over 100! Mixing model parameter Value α 0.65 air 1 mineral 3-7 water 78.5 ρ b 1.4 g/cm 3 25 ρ mineral 2.65 g/cm 3

Errors from ε to θ meas conversion Effect of permittivity of water on accuracy Dielectric Permittivity ~80 at room temperature. The dielectric decreases with increasing temperature at about 0.5%/ºC Error 0 in dry soil to ±0.03 m 3 /m 3 in wet soil Mixing model parameter Value α 0.65 air 1 mineral 4 water 71 85 (45 to 5 C) ρ b 1.4 g/cm 3 26 ρ mineral 2.65 g/cm 3

Accuracy of permittivity/vwc relationship Effect of dielectric permittivity of water (continued) Water that is bound to particles or organic matter has lower apparent permittivity than free water Largest error in clay soils or high organic soils Higher frequency dielectric sensors (TDR, TDT) more significantly affected Capacitance or frequency domain sensors generally not affected 27

Generic calibrations What we typically expect in mineral soil 28 Kizito et. al (2008)

Why do my sensors read negative? Generic calibration doesn t match your soil 29 Kizito et. al (2008)

Generic calibrations fail when: Your soils are not typical soils Organic soils Volcanic soils Odd mineralogy (e.g. titanium) soils Abnormally high EC soils Non-soil media (potting soil, peat, rockwool, perlite, cocus, etc.) Your study requires better than about 0.03 m 3 /m 3 accuracy 30

Soil-specific calibrations Several methods are commonly tried Some produce good results, some don t Dry down method (and modifications of this method) Homogenized soil calibration 31

Soil-specific calibrations Dry down method Sensors are placed in saturated soil in a large container Container is weighed to calculate actual volumetric water content Actual volumetric water content is correlated with sensor output 32

Soil-specific calibrations Dry down method Benefits Appears to mimic environmental conditions Soil disturbance is minimized Limitations Results highly dependent upon where the sensor is within the container (drying front) Drying can take weeks Almost never gives good results 33

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method (recommended) Air dry and sieve soil Pack dry soil to desired bulk density 34

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method (recommended) Carefully insert sensor and record output (multiple times) 35

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method (recommended) Collect known volume(s) of soil to obtain true (absolute) VWC by oven drying 36

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method (recommended) Add enough water to increase VWC by about 0.1 m 3 /m 3 and thoroughly homogenize Repeat 37

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method Benefits Homogenized soil prevents VWC heterogeneity in sample Volumetric sub-samples give true VWC by direct oven drying method No specialized equipment needed Limitations Disturbed soil sample Bulk density hard to control as water is added to soil Volumetric sub-samples impossible to collect in some materials 38

Soil-specific calibrations Homogenized soil method We highly recommend the homogenized method to customers Step-by-step instructions at www.decagon.com Calibration service offered (hundreds of soils/non-soil media calibrated) With care, should be able to get VWC accuracy to ±0.01 to 0.02 m 3 /m 3 39

Outline Introduction VWC definition Direct vs. indirect measurement methods Dielectric permittivity for measuring VWC Accuracy Definitions and scope Approach to accuracy analysis (mixing model) Sensor (dielectric permittivity) accuracy Converting dielectric permittivity to VWC Installation quality and techniques

Installation quality The single largest source of error in measured VWC is poor installation! 41

Installation sensitivity of measurement

Installation quality Voids Typically occur near sensor where sensitivity is greatest VWC underestimated Often results in negative VWC measurement Error can be 0.1 m 3 /m 3 or more 43

Installation quality Bulk density Earlier analysis showed effect of bulk density on measured dielectric/vwc Disturbed or repacked soil often has different bulk density Insert sensor into undisturbed soil 44

Proper installation Sidewall Dig trench to desired depth Carefully insert sensor into undisturbed side wall Backfill trench at native bulk density 45

Proper installation Sidewall Advantages Visual and tactile confirmation of quality insertion Undisturbed soil above sensor Horizontal insertion measures VWC at discrete depth Common and accepted method Disadvantages Large excavation (effort) Large scale soil disturbance 46

Proper installation Down hole Auger hole to desired depth Often 45 angle Insert sensor into undisturbed soil in bottom of hole Carefully backfill hole at native bulk density

Proper installation Down hole Advantages Deep installations possible Minimal soil disturbance Disadvantages Impossible to verify quality installation One hole per sensor Installation tool necessary 48

Installation Hard or stony soils Hard soils Use tool to make pilot hole Must be slightly smaller than sensor Stony soils Sieve stones from a volume of soil Re-pack sieved soil around sensor Disturbed sample Possible poor accuracy Still measures dynamics well 49

4 th source of error point vs. field scale (I know I said I was only going to talk about 3) All dielectric sensors have small measurement volume (10 s to 100 s of cm 3 ) Scaling point measurements to representative field scale measurement is difficult Replicated measurements and averaging Other strategies available Whole topic is outside the scope of this discussion 50

Take-home points 3 sources of error in VWC measurement Sensor error How accurately the sensor measures dielectric permittivity Only factor that can be controlled by manufacturer Dielectric permittivity to VWC conversion Depends on bulk density, temperature, mineralogy Generic calibrations work for most typical soils Soil-specific calibration necessary in some cases

Take-home points

Take-home points