Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Similar documents
Homework 7 - Solutions

Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Systems Analysis and Control

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n

Chapter 7. Digital Control Systems

Control Systems. University Questions

Frequency Response Techniques

Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus

Controller Design using Root Locus

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

EEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems

CHAPTER # 9 ROOT LOCUS ANALYSES

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

If you need more room, use the backs of the pages and indicate that you have done so.

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION

R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1

Software Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions

Systems Analysis and Control

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

Root Locus Design Example #3

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10

1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I

7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM

10ES-43 CONTROL SYSTEMS ( ECE A B&C Section) % of Portions covered Reference Cumulative Chapter. Topic to be covered. Part A

Systems Analysis and Control

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

Control Systems, Lecture04

Lecture 1 Root Locus

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

Alireza Mousavi Brunel University

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

PID controllers. Laith Batarseh. PID controllers

GATE : , Copyright reserved. Web:

STABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Introduction to Root Locus. What is root locus?

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 5

Performance of Feedback Control Systems

Engraving Machine Example

Systems Analysis and Control

Root Locus Design Example #4

Course Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.

Control Systems. EC / EE / IN. For

Control of Manufacturing Processes

Chapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control

ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION

Chapter 7 : Root Locus Technique

FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

Root Locus Techniques

Notes for ECE-320. Winter by R. Throne

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop

r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

Robust Performance Example #1

a. Closed-loop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a

12.7 Steady State Error

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS

Intro to Frequency Domain Design

NPTEL Online Course: Control Engineering

AMME3500: System Dynamics & Control

Chapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems

EE 3CL4: Introduction to Control Systems Lab 4: Lead Compensation

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

Response to a pure sinusoid

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni

Dynamic Compensation using root locus method

Systems Analysis and Control

CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System

Introduction to Feedback Control

Problem Value Score Total 100/105

Control System. Contents

IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Systems Analysis and Control

Analysis of SISO Control Loops

Transcription:

Serial : 0. LS_D_ECIN_Control Systems_30078 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucnow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 0-4546 CLASS TEST 08-9 ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING Subject : Control System Date of test : 30/07/08 Answer Key. (c) 7. (b) 3. (b) 9. (a) 5. (b). (d) 8. (c) 4. (b) 0. (b) 6. (c) 3. (b) 9. (a) 5. (d). (b) 7. (c) 4. (c) 0. (b) 6. (b). (b) 8. (b) 5. (c). (d) 7. (a) 3. (a) 9. (b) 6. (d). (d) 8. (b) 4. (b) 30. (b)

CT-08 EC Control System 7 Detailed Explanations. (c) t r π φ ω d where φ tan ξ ξ and ω d ωn ξ. (d) characteristic equation (si A) s 0 (si A) ( s )( s ) 0 s comparing with second order characteristic equation ω n ξω n 3 s 3s ξ.5.06 thus the system is over damped. 3. (b) Number of infinite semicircle thus number of pole at origin 4. (c) For the circuit shown G(s) α s R RC R R R s R R RC R R 3Ω Ω 5.50 R Ω 5. (c) Slope at highest frequency ( number of poles number of zeros) 0 db/decade 40 db/decade

8 Electronics Engineering 6. (d) Cs () Rs () or C(s) s 5 s s 5 Taing inverse Laplace transform. we get, c(t) 0 t e 5 or τ 5 0.454 sec 7. (b) Comparing with standard transfer function of a compensator Here, τ 0.04 ατ 0. or α 0. 3 0.04 φ α sin 30 α 8. (c) characteristic equation G(s)H(s) 0 s 4 3s 3 (4s ) 0s 9 0 using Routh s tabular form S 4 S 3 S S S 0 4 9 3 0 0 30.66 9.00 9 9 0 0 0 Number of sign change Hence, two poles lies on the RHS. 9. (a) The intersection point centroid Σp Σz ( p z ) magnitude 3 5 6 3 3 0. (b) Characteristic equation is given by s 6s 6 0 s ξω n s ω n 0

CT-08 EC Control System 9 ω n 4 rad/s ξ 3 ξ 0.75 underdamped system For underdamped system T sec ξωn 3 settling time of the system for % tolerance band 4T 4.33 sec 3. (d) The poles of the three systems will have same real part and two poles for each system indicate a second order system. The envelope of the second order system with unit step input is governed by e ξω n t. Thus the second order system will have same envelope for the following systems. ct () 3 t. (d) Since the phase margin is the phase required for the system to be unstable, or the phase required to mae the total phase of the system equal to 80 at gain crossover frequency. 3. (b) G(s)H(s) s ( st ) Phase crossover frequency for GH(jω) 90 tan ω pc T 80 jω ( jωt) is given by tan ω pc T 90 ω pc Since the phase crossover frequency is not finite thus gain margin of the system does not exist. We can also see this from the nyquist and root locus plot which are shown in the figure below. 4. (b) A system is always stable if its root locus lies on the left side of (jω) axis.

0 Electronics Engineering 5. (d) Characteristic matrix I G(s)H(s) 0 s s 0 0 0 s 0 s s 0 s s s s ( s 3) ( s ) T(s) Gs () I Gs () Hs () G(s) [I G(s)H(s)] Here, T(s) s 3 s s s s s s s s 5s ss ( ) 3s 9s 4 ( s ) ( s ) s 5s ( ss ) 3s 6. (b) From the characteristic equation the location of open loop poles and zeros are P j P j P 3 3 θ P Z thus angle of departure 80 φ θ d φ θz θp φ tan () 90 tan (/) φ 45 tan (/) θ d 80 45 tan (/) 08.4 θ z P P 3 θ P jω j j σ 7. (a) comparing it with the standard equation T(s) T(s) ωn ξω n ω Cs () Rs () s s n 0 s ( 0 ) s 0 D Rs () 0 Cs () ss ( ( 0 )) D

CT-08 EC Control System ω n 0 0 D ξω n ξ 0 D 0.8 0 D 0.305 8. (b) Put s (p ) then the system becomes: (p ) 3 3( ) (p ) (7 5) (p ) 4 7 0 p 3 3p p( ) 4 0 The Rooth s array is 3 p ( ) p 3 4 p 3 6 4 3 0 p 4 For stability: 3 > 0 and 3 6 4 3 > 0 > 0 3 6 4 > 0 > 0.53 and <.5 > 0.53 9. (a) G(s) ( s)0 ss ( ) 0 0s T(s) s s( 0 ) 0 ω n 0 3.6 rad/sec ξω n 0 ξωn 0 ξπ ξ now, M p % 9.49% e ξ 0.6 thus 0.8 v lim sg( s) 5 s 0 e ss 0. v 0. (b) By calculating the characteristic equation, we get G(s) H(s) 0 K s ( ) 3 ( 4) s 0

Electronics Engineering (s ) 3 (s 4) K 0 s 4 7s 3 5s 3s (K 4) 0 s 4 5 (4 K) s 3 7 3 0 s s 3.4 4.9 7 K 3.4 (4 K) 0 0 s 0 4 K Range of K 4 < K < 0.4 a 4 b 0.4 b a 5.. (b) Transfer function C[sI A] B T (s) [ ] s 0 0 s 3 s 3 0 ( s )( s 3) 0 s [ ] ( s )( s 3) s [ ] T(s) ( s ) For unit step input U(s) s Y(s) s ( s ) e ss lim sy( s) s 0. (b) Before closing the switch s Cs () Rs () ζ and e ss s as a sr() s s s lim se( s) lim 0 0 GH ( s )

CT-08 EC Control System 3 e ss s 0 ( ) s s as lim s s as 3. (a) 4. (b) e ss a After closing the switch s Cs () Rs () s ( a ) s a ζ and e ss lim se( s) s 0 e ss a Therefore e ss and ζ both will increase. controllability matrix Q c [ B: AB ] for controllable Q c 0 αα αα α 0 α α α α α α 0 or α 0 observability matrix Q 0 C T : A T C T β β β β β for observability Q 0 0 or β (β β ) β β 0 β ββ ββ 0 or β 0 G(s) and H(s) 0.5 40 ss ( 4) 40 0.5 0 0 GH s 4s 0 ss ( ) SH T GH ss 4 ( ) at T H s j S ω ( ) 0 jω 4jω 0 ω 0.5 rad/sec 0 ω 4jω 0

4 Electronics Engineering 0 0 ( ) j 0.5 0 0 j 4 T S H 0 0 394.065 9.85.0075.008 5. (b) The signal flow graph of the above system is U /s /s X X X X Y Ẋ U X Ẋ X X U The state model Chec for controllability: Y X X X U X 0 X X y [ 0] X Q c [B : AB] Q c Q c 0 and ρ(q c ) ρ(a) non-controllable Chec for observability Q 0 [C T : A T C T ] Observable Q 0 0 Q 0 0 and ρ(q 0 ) ρ(a) 6. (c) Brea away point can be calculated as dk 0 ds The characteristic equation for unity feedbac system is G(s) 0 4 K s s ( s ) 0

CT-08 EC Control System 5 or s ( s ) K s 4 or K dk ds 0 s ( s ) 4 s 4 (3 4 ) ( ) s s s s s 4 s 4 or 3 ss ( 8) s s ( s ) 0 or s 0, 4, 4 The brea point 4 Equal roots are at s 4 Hence K(s 4) 4 4 8 48 4 4 7. (c) For second order system M PO 0.6 / e πξ ξ / e πξ ξ or ξ 0.5 Because of maximum overshoot occur at pea time t p or ωn ξ 5 3 π π π ω d ω ξ 5 3 5 3 ω n (0.5) ω n 0 rad/sec for sinusoidal input, the frequency response is the steady state response ω r ωn ξ n 0 0.5 7.07 rad/sec 8. (b) To unstablize the system, the critical point must be located between 0 to 0.5. Additional gain required 0.5 K K or 0 log K 6 db

6 Electronics Engineering 9. (b) Here, ω r 4 rad/sec ωn ξ ; ξ 0.707...() m r.5...() ξ ξ from equation () 4ξ ( ξ ) 0.64 ξ ξ 4 0.6 ξ 4 0.6 ξ 0 ξ 0.8 and 0. ξ 0.894, 0.447 for ξ 0.447 ω n 5.6 rad/sec π θ π cos (0.447) τ r.033 0.4403 sec ωd 5.6 0.447 4.676 30. (b) R ( GG G4) G3 C H 3 G H H R ( GG G4) G3 C G H H3 H H R ( GG G4) G3 C H H G HH 3 (G G G )G 4 3 C G (GG G 4)G3 R GH GH(H 3 GGH) 3 GGHH 3 4 If G G 3 5 G 9 G 4 H H 4 and H 3 6 C R ( 9 )5 ( 4)(6 9 5 4) 5 4 4 95 0.0646 47