Stability and composition of transfer functions

Similar documents
TWO- PHASE APPROACH TO DESIGN ROBUST CONTROLLER FOR UNCERTAIN INTERVAL SYSTEM USING GENETIC ALGORITHM

PART 1. Linear Systems

MRAGPC Control of MIMO Processes with Input Constraints and Disturbance

Edge Theorem for Multivariable Systems 1

Automatic Control Systems theory overview (discrete time systems)

THIS paper deals with robust control in the setup associated

MANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation

Model Order Reduction of Interval Systems using Mihailov Criterion and Factor Division Method

CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER

Fixed Order H Controller for Quarter Car Active Suspension System

Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method

PD controller for second order unstable systems with time-delay

Robust SPR Synthesis for Low-Order Polynomial Segments and Interval Polynomials

QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS

Didier HENRION henrion

Control Systems. Frequency domain analysis. L. Lanari

Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems

Design Methods for Control Systems

Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 100 (2015 )

L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown

Automatic Control Systems, 9th Edition

Contents. 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5. 2 Linearization Causality, Time Invariance, and Linearity 31

Lecture 4 Stabilization

The Tuning of Robust Controllers for Stable Systems in the CD-Algebra: The Case of Sinusoidal and Polynomial Signals

Analysis of SISO Control Loops

Stability Margin Based Design of Multivariable Controllers

PARAMETRIC SYNTHESIS OF QUALITATIVE ROBUST CONTROL SYSTEMS USING ROOT LOCUS FIELDS. A.A. Nesenchuk

POSITIVE REALNESS OF A TRANSFER FUNCTION NEITHER IMPLIES NOR IS IMPLIED BY THE EXTERNAL POSITIVITY OF THEIR ASSOCIATE REALIZATIONS

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Chapter Robust Performance and Introduction to the Structured Singular Value Function Introduction As discussed in Lecture 0, a process is better desc

Automatic Loop Shaping in QFT by Using CRONE Structures

A FEEDBACK STRUCTURE WITH HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES IN REGULATOR. Ryszard Gessing

Control Systems. Laplace domain analysis

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF CONTROL SYSTEMS

ThM06-2. Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure

Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems

Performance Limitations for Linear Feedback Systems in the Presence of Plant Uncertainty

The parameterization of all. of all two-degree-of-freedom strongly stabilizing controllers

Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

Chapter 9 Observers, Model-based Controllers 9. Introduction In here we deal with the general case where only a subset of the states, or linear combin

Partial Fractions Jeremy Orloff

Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control

Physica A. Preserving synchronization under matrix product modifications

80DB A 40DB 0DB DB

Projection of state space realizations

A DESIGN METHOD FOR SIMPLE REPETITIVE CONTROLLERS WITH SPECIFIED INPUT-OUTPUT CHARACTERISTIC

II.3. POLYNOMIAL ANALYSIS. Didier HENRION

ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF DISTURBANCE OBSERVER AS AN ADD-ON ROBUST CONTROLLER

Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Didier HENRION henrion

FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS

CompensatorTuning for Didturbance Rejection Associated with Delayed Double Integrating Processes, Part II: Feedback Lag-lead First-order Compensator

DISTURBANCE OBSERVER BASED CONTROL: CONCEPTS, METHODS AND CHALLENGES

A ROBUST STABILITY TEST PROCEDURE FOR A CLASS OF UNCERTAIN LTI FRACTIONAL ORDER SYSTEMS

Linear State Feedback Controller Design

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31

Quantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System

CERTAIN ALGEBRAIC TESTS FOR ANALYZING APERIODIC AND RELATIVE STABILITY IN LINEAR DISCRETE SYSTEMS

LMI Based Model Order Reduction Considering the Minimum Phase Characteristic of the System

A Simple Derivation of Right Interactor for Tall Transfer Function Matrices and its Application to Inner-Outer Factorization Continuous-Time Case

Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems

The norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.

3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions

A GENERALIZATION OF THE YOULA-KUČERA PARAMETRIZATION FOR MIMO STABILIZABLE SYSTEMS. Alban Quadrat

Matrix Equations in Multivariable Control

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

Chapter Stability Robustness Introduction Last chapter showed how the Nyquist stability criterion provides conditions for the stability robustness of

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION Vol. III Extended Control Structures - Boris Lohmann

Robust Absolute Stability of Time-Varying Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems

Decentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections

Chapter 7 Interconnected Systems and Feedback: Well-Posedness, Stability, and Performance 7. Introduction Feedback control is a powerful approach to o

Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems

W 1 æw 2 G + 0 e? u K y Figure 5.1: Control of uncertain system. For MIMO systems, the normbounded uncertainty description is generalized by assuming

Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties

SWITCHING CONTROL BASED ON MULTIPLE MODELS

Transform Solutions to LTI Systems Part 3

H 2 optimal model reduction - Wilson s conditions for the cross-gramian

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response

Analysis and Synthesis of Single-Input Single-Output Control Systems

AN OPTIMIZATION-BASED APPROACH FOR QUASI-NONINTERACTING CONTROL. Jose M. Araujo, Alexandre C. Castro and Eduardo T. F. Santos

Robust Anti-Windup Controller Synthesis: A Mixed H 2 /H Setting

Fundamental Characteristics of Feedback Mechanisms

A Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Control Direction

Optimal nonlinear control for time delay system. Delsys 2013

Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes

Theory of Robust Control

Design and Implementation of Sliding Mode Controller using Coefficient Diagram Method for a nonlinear process

A Method to Teach the Parameterization of All Stabilizing Controllers

Recent Advances in Positive Systems: The Servomechanism Problem

arxiv: v1 [math.oc] 30 May 2014

FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control

EECE 460 : Control System Design

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION CONTENTS VOLUME VII

ECE504: Lecture 9. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 04-Nov-2008

H State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions

A Survey for the Selection of Control Structure for Distillation Columns Based on Steady State Controllability Indexes

Upper and Lower Bounds of Frequency Interval Gramians for a Class of Perturbed Linear Systems Shaker, Hamid Reza

Optimizing simultaneously over the numerator and denominator polynomials in the Youla-Kučera parametrization

Transcription:

Problem 1.1 Stability and composition of transfer functions G. Fernández-Anaya Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Universidad Iberoaméricana Lomas de Santa Fe 01210 México D.F. México guillermo.fernandez@uia.mx J. C. Martínez-García Departamento de Control Automático CINVESTAV-IPN A.P. 14-740 07300 México D.F. México martinez@ctrl.cinvestav.mx 1 INTRODUCTION As far as the frequency-described continuous linear time-invariant systems are concerned, the study of control-oriented properties (like stability) resulting from the substitution of the complex Laplace variable s by rational transfer functions have been little studied by the Automatic Control community. However, some interesting results have recently been published: Concerning the study of the so-called uniform systems, i.e., LTI systems consisting of identical components and amplifiers, it was established in [8] a general criterion for robust stability for rational functions of the form D(f(s)), where D(s) is a polynomial and f(s) is a rational transfer function. By applying such a criterium, it gave a generalization of the celebrated Kharitonov s theorem [7], as well as some robust stability criteria under H - uncertainty. The results given in [8] are based on the so-called H-domains. 1 As far as robust stability of polynomial families is concerned, some Kharito- 1 The H-domain of a function f (s) is defined to be the set of points h on the complex plane for which the function f (s) h has no zeros on the open right-half complex plane.

4 PROBLEM 1.1 nov s like results [7] are given in [9] (for a particular class of polynomials), when interpreting substitutions as nonlinearly correlated perturbations on the coefficients. More recently, in [1], some results for proper and stable real rational SISO functions and coprime factorizations were proved, by making substitutions with α (s) = (as + b) / (cs + d), where a, b, c, and d are strictly positive real numbers, and with ad bc 0. But these results are limited to the bilinear transforms, which are very restricted. In [4] is studied the preservation of properties linked to control problems (like weighted nominal performance and robust stability) for Single-Input Single- Output systems, when performing the substitution of the Laplace variable (in transfer functions associated to the control problems) by strictly positive real functions of zero relative degree. Some results concerning the preservation of control-oriented properties in Multi-Input Multi-Output systems are given in [5], while [6] deals with the preservation of solvability conditions in algebraic Riccati equations linked to robust control problems. Following our interest in substitutions we propose in section 22.2 three interesting problems. The motivations concerning the proposed problems are presented in section 22.3. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEMS In this section we propose three closely related problems. The first one concerns the characterization of a transfer function as a composition of transfer functions. The second problem is a modified version of the first problem: the characterization of a transfer function as the result of substituting the Laplace variable in a transfer function by a strictly positive real transfer function of zero relative degree. The third problem is in fact a conjecture concerning the preservation of stability property in a given polynomial resulting from the substitution of the coefficients in the given polynomial by a polynomial with non-negative coefficients evaluated in the substituted coefficients. Problem 1: Let a Single Input Single Output (SISO) transfer function G(s) be given. Find transfer functions G 0 (s) and H(s) such that: 1. G (s) = G 0 (H (s)) ; 2. H (s) preserves proper stable transfer functions under substitution of the variable s by H (s), and: 3. The degree of the denominator of H(s) is the maximum with the properties 1 and 2.

STABILITY AND COMPOSITION OF TRANSFER FUNCTIONS 5 Problem 2: Let a SISO transfer function G(s) be given. Find a transfer function G 0 (s) and a Strictly Positive Real transfer function of zero relative degree (SPR0), say H(s), such that: 1. G(s) = G 0 (H (s)) and: 2. The degree of the denominator of H(s) is the maximum with the property 1. Problem 3: (Conjecture) Given any stable polynomial: a n s n + a n 1 s n 1 + + a 1 s + a 0 and given any polynomial q(s) with non-negative coefficients, then the polynomial: is stable (see [3]). q(a n )s n + q(a n 1 )s n 1 + + q(a 1 )s + q(a 0 ) 3 MOTIVATIONS Consider the closed-loop control scheme: y (s) = G (s) u (s) + d (s), u (s) = K (s) (r (s) y (s)), where: P (s) denotes the SISO plant; K (s) denotes a stabilizing controller; u (s) denotes the control input; y (s) denotes the control input; d (s) denotes the disturbance and r (s) denotes the reference input. We shall denote the closed-loop transfer function from r (s) to y (s) as F r (G (s), K (s)) and the closed-loop transfer function from d (s) to y (s) as F d (G (s), K (s)). Consider the closed-loop system F r (G (s), K (s)), and suppose that the plant G(s) results from a particular substitution of the s Laplace variable in a transfer function G 0 (s) by a transfer function H(s), i.e., G(s) = G 0 (H(s)). It has been proved that a controller K 0 (s) which stabilizes the closed-loop system F r (G 0 (s), K 0 (s)) is such that K 0 (H (s)) stabilizes F r (G (s), K 0 (H (s))) (see [2] and [8]). Thus, the simplification of procedures for the synthesis of stabilizing controllers (profiting from transfer function compositions) justifies problem 1. As far as problem 2 is concerned, consider the synthesis of a controller K (s) stabilizing the closed-loop transfer function F d (G (s), K (s)), and such that F d (G (s), K (s)) < γ, for a fixed given γ > 0. If we known that G(s) = G 0 (H (s)), being H (s) a SPR0 transfer function, the solution of problem 2 would arise to the following procedure: 1. Find a controller K 0 (s) which stabilizes the closed-loop transfer function F d (G 0 (s), K 0 (s)) and such that: F d (G 0 (s), K 0 (s)) < γ.

6 PROBLEM 1.1 2. The composed controller K (s) = K 0 (H (s)) stabilizes the closedloop system F d (G (s), K (s)) and: (see [2], [4], and [5]). F d (G (s), K (s)) < γ It is clear that condition 3 in the first problem, or condition 2 in the second problem, can be relaxed to the following condition: the degree of the denominator of H (s) is as high as be possible with the appropriate conditions. With this new condition, the open problems are a bit less difficult. Finally, problem 3 can be interpreted in terms of robustness under positive polynomial perturbations in the coefficients of a stable transfer function. BIBLIOGRAPHY [1] G. Fernández, S. Muñoz, R. A. Sánchez, and W. W. Mayol, Simultaneous stabilization using evolutionary strategies, Int. J. Contr., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1417-1435, 1997. [2] G. Fernández, Preservation of SPR functions and stabilization by substitutions in SISO plants, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2171-2174, 1999. [3] G. Fernández and J. Alvarez, On the preservation of stability in families of polynomials via substitutions, Int. J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 671-685, 2000. [4] G. Fernández, J. C. Martínez-García, and V. Kučera, H -Robustness Properties Preservation in SISO Systems when applying SPR Substitutions, Submitted to the International Journal of Automatic Control. [5] G. Fernández and J. C. Martínez-García, MIMO Systems Properties Preservation under SPR Substitutions, International Symposium on the Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS 2002), University of Notre Dame, USA, August 12-16, 2002. [6] G. Fernández, J. C. Martínez-García, and D. Aguilar-George, Preservation of solvability conditions in Riccati equations when applying SPR0 substitutions, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002. [7] V. L. Kharitonov, Asymptotic stability of families of systems of linear differential equations, Differential nye Uravneniya, vol. 14, pp. 2086-2088, 1978.

STABILITY AND COMPOSITION OF TRANSFER FUNCTIONS 7 [8] B. T. Polyak and Ya. Z. Tsypkin, Stability and robust stability of uniform systems, Automation and Remote Contr., vol. 57, pp. 1606-1617, 1996. [9] L. Wang, Robust stability of a class of polynomial families under nonlinearly correlated perturbations, System and Control Letters, vol. 30, pp. 25-30, 1997.