CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Similar documents
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Bending and Shear in Beams

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Plastic design of continuous beams

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

SHEAR DESIGN EQUATIONS FOR FRP RC BEAMS

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

Reinforced Concrete Structures

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

ULTIMATE SHEAR OF BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH CFRP SHEETS

Earthquake-resistant design of indeterminate reinforced-concrete slender column elements

SeismoBuild Verification Report (KANEPE) For version 2018

Shear Strength of Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Web Reinforcement

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF CORNERS IN RC FRAMES USING STRUT-AND-TIE METHOD AND CDP MODEL

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE COLUMNS WITH INADEQUATE TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT. Alistair Boys 1 Des K. Bull 2 Stefano Pampanin 3 ABSTRACT

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Lap splice length and details of column longitudinal reinforcement at plastic hinge region

Entrance exam Master Course

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by:

9.5 Compression Members

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

JUT!SI I I I TO BE RETURNED AT THE END OF EXAMINATION. THIS PAPER MUST NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE EXAM CENTRE. SURNAME: FIRST NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:

Appendix K Design Examples

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

DIAGONAL TENSION RC BEAM without SHEAR REINFORCEMENT RC BEAM with WEB REINFORCEMENT KCI CODE PROVISION. ALTERNATIVE MODELS for SHEAR ANALYSIS

Displacement-based methods EDCE: Civil and Environmental Engineering CIVIL Advanced Earthquake Engineering

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

Evaluation of size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams using refined strut-and-tie model

Basic Energy Principles in Stiffness Analysis

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH

National Exams May 2015

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.


Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements

APPLICATION OF INTENSIVE SHEAR REINFORCEMENT TO SPLICING SLEEVE JOINT OF PRE-FABRICATED REINFORCEMENT ASSEMBLY

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

Fracture Mechanics of Non-Shear Reinforced R/C Beams

Failure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

Prediction of static response of Laced Steel-Concrete Composite beam using effective moment of inertia approach

Mechanics of Structure

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames

2. Determine the deflection at C of the beam given in fig below. Use principal of virtual work. W L/2 B A L C

Samantha Ramirez, MSE

FCP Short Course. Ductile and Brittle Fracture. Stephen D. Downing. Mechanical Science and Engineering

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

Prediction of the Lateral Load Displacement Curves for RC Squat Walls Failing in Shear

Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams

Coupling Beams of Shear Walls

Chord rotation demand for Effective Catenary Action under Monotonic. Loadings

Crack Width Prediction for Interior Portion of Inverted 'T' Bent Caps

SHEAR CAPACITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS RETROFITTED WITH VERY FLEXIBLE FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER WITH VERY LOW YOUNG S MODULUS

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.

Eurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings

CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE

Applications of the Plate Membrane Theory

Transcription:

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National

In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING We will explore!types openings!behaviour beams with large openings!design for ultimate strength!crack Control!Deflection Calculation A/P Tan K H, A/P Tan K H, 2 Tan K H,

At the end the lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING You should be able to!understand the behaviour beams with openings under bending and shear!design the opening using Mechanism Approach, Plasticity Truss Method or Strut-and-Tie Method!Detail the reinforcement to satisfy serviceability and ultimate limit states A/P Tan K H, A/P Tan K H, 3 Tan K H,

Beams with Openings: and Design. Mansur, M.A. and Kiang-Hwee Tan. CRC Press Ltd, 1999 Page 4

Additional references DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING! Mansur, M.A., Tan, K.H. and Lee, S.L., "A Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Large Openings", Journal the American Concrete Institute, Proceedings, Vol. 82, No. 4, USA, July/August 1985, pp. 517-524.! Tan, K.H. and Mansur, M.A., "Design Procedure for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Web Openings", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 93, No. 4, USA, July- August 1996, pp. 404-411.! Mansur, M.A., Huang, L.M., Tan, K.H. and Lee, S.L., "Analysis and Design R/C Beams with Large Web Openings", Journal the Institution Engineers,, Vol. 31, No. 4, July/August 1991, pp. 59-67. A/P Tan K H, A/P Tan K H, 5 Tan K H,

Page 6

Opening in beam National Page 7

Page 8

Classification Openings National " By geometry: Small opening if Depth or diameter 0.25 x beam depth and Length depth d d 0.25h 0.25h h Page 9 Large opening otherwise.

" By structural response: National Small opening if Beam-type behaviour persists. Large opening otherwise. Page 10

TS T2 Page 11

Page 12

DESIGN TOOLS National " Finite element analysis: elastic stress state area stress concentration " Truss analysis (Strut-and-tie model): lower bound approach detailing for crack control and strength Page 13 " Tests: specific cases serviceability & strength aspects

BEHAVIOUR BEAMS WITH LARGE OPENINGS Page 14

Principal tension stress contours Page 15

M t +M b + Nz = M = M N t + N b = 0 V t + V b = V Page 16

Inadequately reinforced openings Page 17

1 actual 2 idealised 1 2 3 4 3 4 Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

Page 21

Page 22

Page 23

Shear carried by chords Page 24

Contraflexural points Page 25

Page 26 DESIGN & DETAILING OPENINGS - General guidelines sufficient area to develop ultimate compression block in flexure openings to be located more than D/2 from supports, concentrated loads and adjacent openings opening depth D/2 opening length stability chord member deflection requirement beam

Page 27

" Crack control National principal tensile stress direction stress concentration congestion reinforcement Page 28

2 Page 29 shear concentration factor 2 (i.e. 2V u ) diagonal bars to carry 50~75% total shear; vertical stirrups to carry the rest

" Strength requirement 2 general approaches: mechanism approach failure at an opening is due to the formation four plastic hinges, one at each corner the opening truss model approach plasticity truss method strut-and-tie method applied loads are transferred across opening to supports by a truss system lower bound approaches Page 30

Mechanism Approach " Rigorous method 1. Calculate M u and V u at centre opening. 2. Assume suitable reinft. for chord members. Page 31

3. Determine N u in chord members and hinge moments (M u ) *,* from N u = [M u -(M s ) t -(M s ) b ]/z Slide 15 where (M s ) t = [(M u ) t,1 +(M u ) t,2 ]/2 (M s ) b = [(M u ) b,4 +(M u ) b,3 ]/2 and (M u ) *,* are related to N u by the respective M-N interaction diagrams. Page 32

Page 33

4. Calculate V u in chord members from (V u ) t = [(M u ) t,2 -(M u ) t,1 ]/l (V u ) b = [(M u ) b,4 -(M u ) b,3 ]/l where l is the opening length. 5. Check that (V u ) t +(V u ) b V u. Page 34

" Simplified method National Unknowns: N t, N b, M t, M b, V t, V b 3 equations: M t +M b + Nz = M N t + N b = 0 V t + V b = V Assume M t = 0 M b = 0 V b =kv t where k = 0 Page 35 or k = A b /A t k = I b /I t

EXAMPLE A simply supported reinforced concrete beam, 300 mm wide and 600 mm deep, contains a rectangular opening and is subjected to a series point loads as shown. Design and detail the reinforcement for the opening if the design ultimate load P u is 52.8 kn. Material properties are: f c =30 MPa, f yv =250 MPa, and f y =460 MPa. Page 36

Solution by Mechanism Approach National Assume point contraflexure at midpoint chord members and that 40% shear is carried by bottom chord member. At centre opening, M u = 171.6 knm V u = 79.2 kn Page 37

1. Bottom chord member (N u ) b = M u /z = 408.6 kn (V u ) b = 0.4 V u = 31.7 kn (M u ) b =(V u ) b l/2 = 15.1 knm 2A s = 1954 mm 2 (3T20 top + 4T20 bottom) A sv /s = 400 mm 2 /m (minimum) (M6 @ 100 mm spacing) Page 38

2. Top chord member (N u ) t =408.6 kn; (V u ) t =47.5 kn; (M u ) t =22.6 knm 2A s = 516 mm 2 (2T12 +1T10 top & bottom) A sv /s = 525 mm 2 /m (M6 @ 100 mm spacing) Page 39

2T12 + 1T10 2T12 + 1T10 3T20 Page 40

Truss Model Approaches National " Plasticity truss (AIJ approach) A s A s Page 41

" Shear capacity National V u = 2 bd vs ρ v f yv cot φ s where cot φ s = (νf c /ρ v f yv - 1) 2 νf c /ρ v f yv 1 ρ v = A v f yv /bs ν = 0.7 - f c /200 " Longitudinal reinforcement Page 42 T sn = A sn f y = V u l/2d vs T sf = A sf f y = V u (l +d vs cot φ s )/2d vs

Page 43 V d = A sd f yd sin θ d

Solution by Plasticity Truss Method (AIJ) National 1. Calculate v. v = V u /(2bd vs νf c )=0.089 2. Determine shear reinforcement. From v = ψ(1-ψ), obtain ψ ρ v f yv /νf c = 0.008 ρ v = 0.00053 < ρ v,min = 1/3f y = 0.01 A sv /s = 400 mm 2 /m (M6 @ 100 mm spacing) Page 44

3. Determine longitudinal reinforcement. A sn = V u l/2f y d vs = 957 mm 2 A sf = V u (l +d vs cot φ s )/2f y d vs = 1080 mm 2 3T20 (near) + 4T20 (far) 4T20 3T20 3T20 4T20 Page 45

" Strut-and-tie method General Principles 1. Idealize structure as comprising concrete struts and reinforcement ties, joined at nodes. follow stress path given by elastic theory; refine as necessary equilibrium strut and tie forces deformation capacity concrete angle between struts and ties Page 46

2. Calculate forces in struts and ties from equilibrium. check stresses in struts (< 0.6f cd ) detail reinforcement according to calculated tie forces " check for anchorage reinforcement Page 47

Solution by Strut-and-Tie Method 1. Postulate strut-and-tie model. Page 48

2. Calculate member forces. Top chord takes 91% total shear. Stirrup force 3.3 times shear (Model may be simplified.) Page 49

3. Longitudinal reinforcement. Top chord Top steel: 1298 mm 2 (4T20) Bot. steel: 1741 mm 2 (4T25) Bottom chord Top steel: 171 mm 2 (2T12) Bot. steel: 590 mm 2 (2T20) Page 50

4. Transverse reinforcement. National Top chord A sv /s= 1567 mm 2 /m (T8 @ 65 mm) Bottom chord A sv /s= 284 mm 2 /m (M6 @ 65 mm) Page 51

Page 52

CALCULATION OF DEFLECTIONS Stirrup I t Rigid Abutment d s M- M V Hinges V M+ M I b d P l / 2 / 2 e l e P A/P Tan K H, 53

δ δ V Relative displacement hinge w.r.t. one end opening due to V (I t based on gross concrete section; I b based on a fully cracked section) δ = V 3 E c l e 2 I t 3 ( + ) I b Relative displacement one end opening w.r.t. the other end δ v = 2 δ = 12 E V c ( + ) I l t 3 e I b Midspan deflection beam δ = δ w + ( ) ( )... δ v + δ + opening1 v opening 2 A/P Tan K H, 54

Calculate the midspan service load deflection the beam described in the Example. SOLUTION Service load, P s = P u / 1.7 = 52.8 / 1.7 = 31.1 kn; V = 1.5 P s = 46.6 kn. Effective length chord members, l e = (950 + 50) = 1000 mm. Assume I t = I g = 300 x 180 3 /12 = 146 x 10 6 mm 4 ; I b = 0.1 x 146 x 10 6 mm 4 15 x 10 6 mm 4 Also, E c = 4730 30 = 26 x 10 3 MPa Hence, δ v = V l e3 / [12 E c ( I t + I b )] = 46.6 x 10 12 / [12 x 26 x (146 + 15) x 10 9 ] = 0.93 mm A/P Tan K H, 55

Midspan deflection, δ w, the beam is 11PL 3 /144E c I, where I can be conservatively estimated as the moment inertia the beam at a section through the opening. That is, I = 2 x [300 x 180 3 / 12 + 300 x 180 x 210 2 ] = 5054 x 10 6 mm 4 As the span L is 6 m, therefore, δ w =11x 31.1 x 10 3 x (6000) 3 / [144 x 26 x 5054 x 10 9 ] = 3.91 mm Hence, the total midspan deflection is calculated as δ = δ v + δ w = 0.93 + 3.91 = 4.84 mm < L/360 = 16.7 mm A/P Tan K H, 56

Summary National Deflection Add deflection due to shear at each opening Page 57