Towards the Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation

Similar documents
xxv PART I THE DIVIDED OCEANS: INTERNATIONAL LAW GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL ZONES 1

State Practice on the Establishment of Multiple Maritime Boundaries: Assessing the Challenges of Separating Seabed and Water Column Boundaries

Sam Bateman and. State Practice Regarding Straight Baselines In East Asia Legal, Technical and Political Issues in a

Maritime delimitation and environmental protection of fragile seas

Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea

Geographical analysis in maritime boundary delimitation

Delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 M in the light of recent case law

Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Recent ICJ Jurisprudence Nicaragua v Colombia; Peru v Chile

ITLOS s approach to the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 M in Bangladesh/Myanmar: Theoretical and practical difficulties

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A PARTIAL SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE KINGDOM OF TONGA PURSUANT TO

CONTENTS. PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...xi ABBREVIATIONS... xiii FIGURES...xvii INTRODUCTION...1

Outer Continental Shelf

The Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries in the Timor Sea

Law of the Sea Symposium, February, 2016, TOKYO International Law for the Resources of the Sea

The Three Equidistance Lines in Maritime Delimitation: What and Why? By: Dany Channraksmeychhoukroth* (Aug 2015)

Disputes Concerning the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 M

Tore Henriksen a & Geir Ulfstein b a Faculty of Law, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. Available online: 18 Feb 2011

Some Thoughts on Maritime Delimitation among the Northeast Asian States

DELIMITATION OF THE MOZAMBIQUE MARITIME BOUNDARIES WITH NEIGHBORING STATES (INCLUDING THE EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF) AND MANAGEMENT OF OCEAN ISSUES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA PURSUANT TO

Clive Schofield * and David Freestone **

Maritime Delimitation in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice*

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY FIXING AND THE ROLES OF INDONESIAN SURVEYORS

Mindful of the interests which the Parties share as immediate neighbours, and in a spirit of cooperation, friendship and goodwill; and

Maritime Boundary Negotiations National Considerations Dr. Robert W. Smith

The application of international law principle in practice of the delimitation on continental shelf

GeomaticsWorld. Issue No 3 : Volume 21. Helping to unravel Easter Island s mysterious statues. DGI 2013: maritime security highlighted

Maritime Boundary Issues Singapore Workshop: Session 4

Indonesia s Internal Maritime Boundaries

No. 2009/9 3 February Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine)

The Relevance of Hydrography to UNCLOS; an Indonesian Perspective By: Prof. Dr. Hasjim Djalal, MA*

How to Deal with Maritime Boundary Uncertainty in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Areas*

Exclusive Economic Zone Claims By R. Smith

MAPS AND COORDINATES...

COMPLICATIONS IN DELIMITING THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF. Ron Macnab Geological Survey of Canada (Retired)

CONTINENTAL SHELF SUBMISSION OF ANGOLA - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -

This Book Belonged to

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI

Lessons learned from the Gulf of Maine case: the development of maritime boundary delimitation jurisprudence since UNCLOS III

International law principles of continental shelf delimitation and Sino-Japanese East China Sea disputes

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

Coastal State Sovereignity in the Arctic Offshore: Is it Compatible with the Concept of a Borderless North?

JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BY TUVALU, THE REPUBLIC OF FRANCE AND NEW ZEALAND (TOKELAU)

Pacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project

Ocean Governance and the Japanese Basic Act on Ocean Policy

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS MARITIME ZONES DECLARATION ACT 2016.

Briefing document of the status of maritime boundaries in Pacific island countries

SOLVING THE RIDGES ENIGMA OF ARTICLE 76 OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. Written by: George Taft Presented by: George Taft

Legal Interpretation of Submarine Ridges & Submarine Elevations

Preliminary Information Indicative of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles of the People s Republic of China

UNCLOS Zones and Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Overview of Legal Principles

CONFERENCE OF PARLIAMENTARIANS OF THE ARCTIC REGION. UN LOS Convention and the extended continental shelf in the Arctic

Coastal State Sovereignty in the Arctic Offshore: Is it Compatible with the Concept of a Borderless North?

Drawing the Borderline- The Equidistant Principle or Equitable Solutions in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries

The Agreement Concerning the Boundary Line Dividing Parts of the Continental Shelf Between Iran and the United Arab Emirates states that:

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF CLAIMS IN THE ARCTIC. Presentation given by Dr. Kamrul Hossain ASA University Bangladesh 15 March 2010

GIS, Charts and UNCLOS Can they live together?

UNCLOS Delimitations

1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

THE GEOGRAPHY OF A MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION. By Adam J.Kerr

Draft Presentation Carleton Conference on the Arctic Is There a Need for New Legal Regime in the Arctic?

SIXTH REGULAR SESSION, 2017 C.B. NO A BILL FOR AN ACT

Stewardship of the Central Arctic Ocean: The Arctic 5 versus the international community

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

DONAT PHARAND Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Ottawa, Canada Professeur de droit emerite, Universite d'ottawa, Canada

NONLINEAR SYSTEMS. Step response of a servo using an ideal relay. Stability of a nonlinear device using Liapunov s method

MARITIME PLANNING IN PORTUGAL

Legal Implications for Delimitation of Airspace and Outer Space

0620 CHEMISTRY. 0620/23 Paper 2 (Core Theory), maximum raw mark 80

NOAA Nautical Charts and Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning. Meredith Westington Chief Geographer NOAA/NOS/Office of Coast Survey

Wiley. Methods and Applications of Linear Models. Regression and the Analysis. of Variance. Third Edition. Ishpeming, Michigan RONALD R.

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

Timor Sea Maritime Boundaries: a presentation for the ICJA/ILA Colloquium at University of New South Wales 16 August 2014

Boundaries and Borders

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE BLACK SEA RE JOINDER SUBMITTED BY UKRAINE

Chapter 12: Pacific Realm and Polar Futures

The concept of equidistance/relevant circumstances in the development of the law of maritime delimitation

Panel III: Islands and Rocks:

Regional Aspects of Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Guinea: current situation, challenges and possible solutions

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

Against a rising tide: ambulatory baselines and shifting maritime limits in the face of sea level rise

2. Law No. 6 of 1996 on Indonesian Waters (State Gazette of 1996 No. 73, Additional State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No.

Pacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project the latest Update. Malakai Vakautawale (Mr) Maritime Boundaries Adviser

Croatian physical planning system and strategic approach to MSP

International Boundary Study

Adapting to Sea Level Rise: A Law of the Sea Perspective

Pacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project

Vying for Sovereign Rights in the Central Arctic Ocean:

The Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries: A Matter of Life or Death for East Timor?

UNCLOS Article 76- Formulae and constraint lines

THE ROLE OF THE ARCHIPELAGIC BASELINES IN MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education. Published

Slide 1 Geography: Realms, Regions, and Concepts 15 th Edition. Slide 2. Slide 3 Defining the Realm. Chapter 12: Pacific Realm and Polar Futures

The Divided Oceans: International Law Governing Jurisdictional Zones

International Law in the South China Sea

The Place of Joint Development in the Sustainable Arctic Governance

Transcription:

Towards the Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation Legal and Technical Aspects of a Political Process NUNO MARQUES ANTUNES MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS Ll-LIDEN BOSTON

CONTENTS General Introduction 1 I. DELIMITATION LAW IN THE LOSC: THREE DECADES OF DEVELOPMENT Introduction to Part I 13 Chapter 1 - The 1958 Conventions 15 1.1. Introduction 15 1.2. The ILC Pursuit of Normative Standards 17 1.2.a) Pre-1958 State Practice 17 1.2.b) First Drafts 19 1.2.b)(i) The Continental Shelf 19 1.2.b)(ii) The Territorial Sea 22 1.2.c) Subsequent Development of a General Substantive Rule 23 1.3. The First Conference on the Law of the Sea 27 1.3.a) Draft Articles 27 1.3.b) The Debates in the Conference 30 1.3.c) Ratio Legis of the Delimitation Rules 32 1.3.c)(i) Equidistance and Special Circumstances 32 1.3.c)(ii) Historie Title 35 1.3.c)(iii) Delimitation of the Contiguous Zone 38 1.3.c)(iv) Oppositeness and Adjacency in Continental Shelf Delimitation 39 1.3.c)(v) The'Procedural Element' 39 Chapter 2 - Relevant Case Law Pre-1982 41 2.1. The Selected Case Law 41 2.2. The Grisbadarna Arbitration 42 2.2.a) Overview: The Dispute and the Award 42 2.2.b) Critical Analysis 44 2.3. The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases 46 2.3.a) Overview of the Judgment 46 2.3.a)(i) The Dispute 46 2.3.a)(ii) The Reasoning 47 2.3.a)(iii) A Brief Initial Comment 49 2.3.b) The Assessment of Customary Law 49 2.3.b)(i) Summaryof State Practice Post-1958 49 2.3.b)(ii) The Court'sApproach 50 XI

xii TOWARDS THE C0NCEPTUAL1SAT10N OF MARITIME DELIMITATION 2.3.c) The Rule of Article 6 versus Natural Prolongation 56 2.3.d) Normative Standards of Delimitation 60 2.4. The Anglo/French Arbitration 64 2.4.a) Overview 64 2.4.a)(i) The Dispute 64 2.4.a)(ii) The Award 65 2.4.b) Some Points of Contrast with the North Sea Cases 67 2.4.b)(i) A Different Task 67 2.4.b)(ii) The Clarification of Certain Issues 68 2.4.b)(iii) The Contribution to International Law 69 2.4.C) Article 6 of the CS Convention 70 2.4.c)(i) Interpretation 70 2.4.c)(ii) Conventional and Customary Law 73 2.4.c)(iii) Special Circumstances, Geography and Equity 76 Chapter 3 - Maritime Delimitation in the LOSC 81 3.1. Introduction 81 3.2. Brief Notes on Treaty Interpretation 82 3.3. EEZ and Continental Shelf 84 3.3.a) Drafting History 84 3.3.b) The Interpretation of Articles 74(1) and 83(1) 87 3.3.b)(i) Common Intention of the Parties 87 3.3.b)(ii) The Text and the Context 89 3.3.b)(iii) Normativity and Equitable Solution 90 3.3.b)(iv) The Standards of Delimitation in International Law 94 3.4. Territorial Sea: Crystallisation of a Balanced Rule 98 3.5. Contiguous Zone: Non-Existence of a Delimitation Rule 100 3.6. The 'Procedural Element' of Delimitation Rules 102 3.6.a) Introductory Remarks 102 3.6.b) Agreements in Maritime Delimitation 103 3.6.c) Is There an Obligation to Negotiate? 105 3.6.d) The Justiciability of Maritime Boundary Disputes 106 Conclusions to Part I 109 II. CORE ISSUES: CONCEPT, METHODS AND NORMATIVITY Introduction to Part II 117 Chapter 4 - The Concept of Maritime Delimitation 119 4.1. The Need for Conceptualisation 119 4.2. Delimitation: A Two-Phase Operation 120 4.2.a) Political-Legal Determination and Technical Definition 120 4.2.b) Case Law 121 4.2.b)(i) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases 121 4.2.b)(ii) Anglo/French Arbitration 121 4.2.b)(iii) Dubai/Sharjah Arbitration 122 4.2.b)(iv) Tunisia/Libya Case 122 4.2.b)(v) Gulfof Maine Case 123

CONTENTS xiii 4.2.b)(vi) Jan Mayen Case 123 4.2.c) State Practice 124 4.2.d) Technical Support to Maritime Delimitation 125 4.2.e) Compliance of the Definition with the Determination 126 4.3. Overlapping of Entitlements as the Object-Matter 128 4.3.a) Early Developments in Case Law 128 4.3.b) Overlapping of Entitlements and Overlapping of Claims 129 4.3.c) Title, Entitlement and Delimitation 132 4.3.d) The Inexorable'Amputation'of Potential Entitlements 137 4.3.d)(0 The Overlapping of Entitlements as Concurrence of Rights ] 37 4.3.d)(ii) Delimitation as 'Amputation' of Entitlements of the Same Type 139 4.3.d)(iii) Precedence between Entitlements: Practice 141 4.3.d)(iv) Precedence between Entitlements: Rationale 142 Chapter 5 - Methods and Line-Defining Techniques 147 5.1. Introductory Notes 147 5. La) The Need for Technical Expertise 147 5.1.b) Methods and Line-Defining Techniques 149 5.1.c) Technicalities and Law 151 5.2. Equidistance and Equidistance-Related Methods 152 5.2.a) Method of Equidistance 152 5.2.a)(i) A Proper Historical-Technical Background 152 5.2.a)(ü) Contents and Technical Aspects 154 5.2.b) Simplified and Modified Equidistance 157 5.2.c) Adjustmentof Baselines and Partial-Effect Adjustments 158 5.2.d) "Methodes de Lissage" 161 5.2.d)(i) Perpendicular-Lines 161 5.2.d)(ü) Bisector-Lines 163 5.2.d)(üi) Radial-Lines of a Circumference 164 5.2.d)(iv) Appraisal and Rationale 164 5.2.e) Pseudo-Equidistance 166 5.2.f) Equiratio Method 167 5.3. Other Methods and Line-Defining Techniques 168 5.3.a) Enclaving 168 5.3.b) Navigable Channel (Thalweg) 170 5.3.c) Coastal Length Comparison (Proportionality) 171 5.3.d) ^//oc-approaches 173 5.3.d)(i) Basic Notion 173 5.3.d)(ii) Parallels, Meridians and Other Straight Lines 174 5.3.d)(iii) 'Corridor-Solutions' 175 Chapter 6 - Normativity in Maritime Delimitation 177 6.1. The Delimitation Process: Choice of Procedural Means 177 6. La) Preliminary Notes 177 6.1.b) Negotiation versus Adjudication: Outstanding Issues 177 6.1.b)(i) Operative Distinction between Negotiation and Adjudication 177 6.1.b)(ii) Normativity in Negotiated Agreements 179 6.1.b)(iii) Adjudication: Realjurisprudenz or Judicial Reasoning? 181 6.2. Dogmatics of Normativity and Maritime Delimitation 184

xiv TO WARDS THE CONCEPTUALISA TION OF MARITIME DELIMITA TION 6.2.a) KeyAspects 184 6.2.b) Legal Systems: Principles and Rules 186 6.2.c) Normativity in Maritime Delimitation 190 6.2.c)(i) Brief Appraisal 190 6.2.c)(ii) Legal Principles in International Law 193 6.3. The Principle of Maritime Zoning 195 6.3.a) Maritime Jurisdiction 195 6.3.a)(i) Basic Concept 195 6.3.a)(ii) Ambit of Interest for This Study 195 6.3.b) Allocation of Maritime Jurisdiction: Maritime Zoning 196 6.3.b)(i) Introductory Remarks 196 6.3.b)(ii) The Paramountcy of Proximity in Maritime Zoning 197 6.3.c) Maritime Zoning versus Maritime Delimitation 201 6.3.c)(i) Maritime Entitlement and Overlapping of Entitlements 201 6.3 x)(ii) Overview of Case Law. The Pre-LOSC Period 202 6.3.c)(iii) Overview of Case Law: The Post-LOSC Period 203 6.3.d) Equidistance ('Closer Proximity') asa Legal Concept 204 6.3.d)(i) Recent Trend in Case Law 204 6.3.d)(ii) A Corollary Emanating from to the Principle of Maritime Zoning 207 6.3.d)(iii) Equidistance as Reference Point for the "Third-State Issue' 209 6.3.d)(iv) The Equitable Normative Content of Equidistance 211 6.4. The Principle of Equity in Maritime Delimitation 214 6.4.a) Key Thoughtson the Concept of Equity 214 6.4.a)(i) An 'Indefinable' Concept 214 6.4.a)(ii) Legal Systems, Normativity and Equity 215 6.4.a)(iii) Justice In Casu and 'Normative Equity' 217 6.4.a)(iv) Functions and Bounds of 'Normative Equity' 220 6.4.a)(v) Reasonableness as the Scope of 'Normative Equity' 224 6.4.b) 'Normative Equity' in Maritime Delimitation 226 6.4.b)(i) First Period (1945-1969) 226 6.4.b)(ii) Second Period (1969-1993) 228 6.4.b)(iii) Third Period (1993 to date) 232 6.4.b)(iv) A Requiem for the Term "Equitable Principles" 234 Conclusions to Part II 239 III. DENOUEMENT Introduction to Part III 255 Chapter 7 - Delimitation Process: A Proposal for Rationalisation 257 7.1. Determination of a Line: The Key Issue 257 7.2. Choice of Factors: 'Factual Matrix' and 'Legal Matrix' 259 7.2.a) The Notion of Unicum 259 7.2.b) Delimitation Factors: Preliminary Approach 260 7.2.c) Delimitation Factors: A Basis for Objective 'Typification' 262 7.3. The 'Weighing-Up Process' 265 7.3.a) A Legal Multiple-Factor Analysis 265 7.3.b) 'Multicriteria Decision-Making' in an Extra-Legal Context 266

CONTENTS xv 7.3.c) From Objectivity to'subjectivity': An Inevitable Step 269 7.4. Modus Operandi of Delimitation Factors: Choice of Line 272 7.4.a) 'Multicriteria Decision-Making' in the Legal Context 272 7.4.b) Framework for Reasoning Discourse 275 7.4.c) The Determination of the Boundary 279 Chapter 8 - The Quest for a Boundary-Line 289 8.1. Elements Germane to the 'Weighing-Up Process' 289 8.2. Facts Related with the Basis of Maritime Entitlement 290 8.2.a) Coastline 290 8.2.b) 'Controlling Basepoints' 292 8.2.C) Islands 293 8.2.d) General Direction of the Coast and Facades 298 8.2.e) Coastal Length (and Its Role in Proportionality) 301 8.2.e)(i) Introductory Notes 301 8.2.e)(ii) Three Fundamental Issues 302 8.2.e)(iii) Tentative Suggestions for Practical Use 304 8.2.0 Macrogeography (and Entitlements of Third-States) 307 8.2.g) Natural Prolongation: Geology and Geomorphology 310 8.3. Facts Related with the Regime of Exclusiveness 313 8.3.a) Natural Resources: Petroleum and Fisheries in Particular 313 8.3.b) Defence and Security 317 8.3.c) Navigation 319 8.3.d) Historical Regimes 321 8.4. Complementary Delimitation Elements 324 8.4.a) Delimitation Area and the Scope to Redress Inequities 324 8.4.b) Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles 327 8.4.b)(i) Areas Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Entitlement and Overlap 327 8.4.b)(ii) Overlapping of Two Entitlements Beyond 200 M 330 8.4.b)(iii) 200 M Entitlement versus Entitlement Beyond 200 M 333 8.4.c) The Single Maritime Boundary Issue 335 8.4.c)(i) Towards the 'Territorialisation' of Maritime Boundaries 335 8.4.c)(ii) All-Purpose Boundary: Single Line or Dual-Coincident Lines 338 8.4.d) The Emergence of 'Grey Areas' 342 8.4.e) Other Issues 346 8.4.e)(i) Simplicity of the Boundary-Line 346 8.4.e)(ü) Agreement on Aspects of the Boundary-Line 347 8.4.e)(iii) Joint Zones 348 Chapter 9 - Test Study: Maritime Delimitation between Australia and East Timor 351 9.1. Introductory Notes 351 9.2. Background Aspects 352 9.2.a) The Geographical Setting of the Timor Sea 352 9.2.a)(i) Coastal Geography 352 9.2.a)(ii) Seabed Aspects 353 9.2.b) Developments Conceming the Continental Shelf 354 9.2.b)(i) Emergence of the Australian Theory of the 'Two Shel ves" 354 9.2.b)(ii) The 1972 Australia/Indonesia Seabed Boundary Agreement 355 9.2.b)(iii) The Portuguese Approach 356

xvi TO WARDS THE CONCEPTUALISA TION OF MARITIME DELIMITA TION 9.2.b)(iv) The 1989 Timor Gap Treaty 359 9.2.b)(v) The 2002 Timor Sea Treaty 361 9.2.c) Jurisdiction over the Water Column: Brief Notes 364 9.3. Starting Point for the Delimitation 366 9.3.a) The Overlapping of Entitlements 366 9.3.a)(i) Entitlements Based on Distance 366 9.3.a)(ii) The Australian Theory of the 'Two Shelves': What Relevance? 367 9.3.b) The 'Third-State Issue': Aspects Relating to Indonesia 369 9.3.c) The Provisional Equidistance-Line 372 9.4. Relevant Facts 374 9.4.a) Coastal Length and Proportionality 375 9.4.a)(i) Coastal Lengths 376 9.4.a)(ii) Proportionality 377 9.4.b) Natural Prolongation: the Timor Trough 378 9.4.b)(i) Timor Trough: Brief Morphological and Geological Account 379 9.4.b)(ii) Timor Trough: Relevance for Continental Shelf Delimitation 380 9.4.c) Basepoints Unrepresentative of Coastal Relaüonships 382 9.4.c)(i) The Lateral Equidistance-Lines 382 9.4.c)(ii) Australian Basepoints to the East of Cape Londonderry 384 9.4.d) Macrogeographical Considerations 385 9.4.e) Natural Resources: Petroleum 386 9.5. The Choice of Boundary-Line 389 9.5.a) Delimitation Factors 389 9.5.a)(i) Factor A - Coastal Length and Proportionality 390 9.5.a)(ii) Factor B - Natural Prolongation (the Timor Trough) 390 9.5.a)(iii) Factor C - Cut-Off Effect of the 'Lateral-Equidistances' 390 9.5.a)(iv) Factor D~ Effect of the Islands East of Timor 390 9.5.a)(v) Factor - Holothuria Reefs 391 9.5.a)(vi) Factor F- Macrogeography 391 9.5.a)(vii) Factor G - Natural Resources 392 9.5.b 'Discovery' of an Equitable Solution 392 9.5.b)(i) The 'Decision-Matrix' 392 9.5.b)(ii) Recourse to 'Yardsticks' 394 9.5.b)(iü) The Boundary-Lines 399 Conclusions to Part III 403 General Conclusions 411 PostScript 423 APPENDICES Appendix 1. Sketch-Maps and Illustrations 441 Appendix 2. State Practice in Maritime Delimitation 557 Appendix 3. Elementar} Technical Aspects 583 Appendix 4. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms 629 Appendix 5. Bibliographie References 637 Index 681

CONTENTS xvii TABLES Table 1 - Maritime Zoning and Maritime Delimitation: Analogical Relationships 207 Table 2 - 'Decision-Matrix': Analysis of the Parties' Claims 279 Table 3 - 'Decision-Matrix': 'Weighing-Up' of the Delimitation Factors 282 Table 4 - Average 'Distance Ratio' in Certain Adjacent Boundaries 284 Table 5 - 'Negotiation-Matrix': Identification of Goals of States A and B 287 Table 6 - 'Decision-Matrix': Delimitation between Australia and East Timor 393 GRAPHICS Graphic 1 - Intensity of Powers of the Coastal State versus Distance from the Coast 143 Graphic 2 - Principle of Maritime Zoning versus Principle of Equity 244