Random disturbances in machines and production processes

Similar documents
A New Closed-loop Identification Method of a Hammerstein-type System with a Pure Time Delay

Estimation Of Linearised Fluid Film Coefficients In A Rotor Bearing System Subjected To Random Excitation

CHAPTER 9: SEQUENTIAL CIRCUITS

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Robust Control 9 Design Summary & Examples

Metrol. Meas. Syst., Vol. XVIII (2011), No. 2, pp METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS. Index , ISSN

Chapter 3. LQ, LQG and Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control

Smith Predictor Based Autotuners for Time-delay Systems

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

Lecture 21: Physical Brownian Motion II

Topic 7: Filter types and structures

DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS

Time Series Analysis

Design Methods for Control Systems

Signals and Spectra (1A) Young Won Lim 11/26/12

E. I. Milovanović, M. P. Bekakos, I. Ž. Milovanović, T. Z. Mirković. 1. Introduction

Advanced Analog Building Blocks. Prof. Dr. Peter Fischer, Dr. Wei Shen, Dr. Albert Comerma, Dr. Johannes Schemmel, etc

THE EFFECT OF THE FIBER ORIENTATION ON THE DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF ROTORS IN WOUNDING-SHAFT

Vibrational Power Flow Considerations Arising From Multi-Dimensional Isolators. Abstract

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II Bugs/queries to HT 2011 For hints and answers visit dwm/courses/2tf

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

A NOTE ON THE DQ ANALYSIS OF ANISOTROPIC PLATES

A brief introduction to robust H control

Stochastic Processes. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno

Time Domain Analysis of Linear Systems Ch2. University of Central Oklahoma Dr. Mohamed Bingabr

Citation for published version (APA): Berner, J., Hägglund, T., & Åström, K. J. (2016). Improved Relay Autotuning using Normalized Time Delay.

Chapter 8: MULTIPLE CONTINUOUS RANDOM VARIABLES

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

Systems Engineering and Control

Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering

Homework 3 (Stochastic Processes)

ERAD THE SEVENTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RADAR IN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY

D(s) G(s) A control system design definition

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD

Stability Analysis for Linear Systems under State Constraints

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson

Vibration Power Transmission Through Multi-Dimensional Isolation Paths over High Frequencies

Lecture 7 Open-loop & closedloop experiments. The Bias Formula goes closed-loop and the returns

Problem Set 2 Solutions 1

POLYNOMIAL EXPANSION OF THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION ABOUT GAUSSIAN MIXTURES

Discretization of Continuous Linear Anisochronic Models

Design and analysis of the prototype of boiler for steam pressure control

The Basic Feedback Loop. Design and Diagnosis. of the Basic Feedback Loop. Parallel form. The PID Controller. Tore Hägglund. The textbook version:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

PID controllers, part I

Curriculum: MechEng, UC Berkeley

Least costly probing signal design for power system mode estimation

Robust Control 5 Nominal Controller Design Continued

13.42 READING 6: SPECTRUM OF A RANDOM PROCESS 1. STATIONARY AND ERGODIC RANDOM PROCESSES

AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE FOR THE MIMO SITUATION BASED ON CEPSTRAL TECHNIQUES

MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan

Identification of Linear Systems

Mixed Signal IC Design Notes set 6: Mathematics of Electrical Noise

Course Requirements. Course Mechanics. Projects & Exams. Homework. Week 1. Introduction. Fast Multipole Methods: Fundamentals & Applications

Unified Approach to Analog and Digital Two-Degree-of-Freedom PI Controller Tuning for Integrating Plants with Time Delay

R13 SET Derive the expression for the maximum bending stress developed in the leaf spring and also the central deflection of a leaf spring.

9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design

reality is complex process

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II

Control Systems. EC / EE / IN. For

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO OPTIMIZATION USING TIME-FREQUENCY AND AMBIDUITY FUNCTION MATCHED FILTERS *

Chapter 8. Feedback Controllers. Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram for a stirred-tank blending system.

3.0 PROBABILITY, RANDOM VARIABLES AND RANDOM PROCESSES

Analysis and Synthesis of Single-Input Single-Output Control Systems

Wind Turbine Control

EE538 Final Exam Fall 2007 Mon, Dec 10, 8-10 am RHPH 127 Dec. 10, Cover Sheet

CSC 2541: Bayesian Methods for Machine Learning

Chapter 2 Basic Conservation Equations for Laminar Convection

Spectral Analysis of Random Processes

Problem Set 4 Solution 1

UNIT-4: RANDOM PROCESSES: SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS

Review of Probability

Distributed Real-Time Control Systems

Chapter 6: Nonparametric Time- and Frequency-Domain Methods. Problems presented by Uwe

Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems

Symmetric Overbounding of Correlated Errors

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Simple criteria for controller performance monitoring

Control System Design

Robust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization

Decoupling Analysis of a Sliding Structure Six-axis Force/Torque Sensor

Feature extraction 1

Spectra (2A) Young Won Lim 11/8/12

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

CHAPTER 13: FEEDBACK PERFORMANCE

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Design of hybrid control systems for continuous-time plants: from the Clegg integrator to the hybrid H controller

Definition of a Stochastic Process

Passivity-based Adaptive Inventory Control

Control System Design

Editorial Manager(tm) for Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I, Journal of Systems and Control Engineering Manuscript Draft

CHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING

Monte Carlo integration

Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018

ECE 636: Systems identification

Process Solutions. Process Dynamics. The Fundamental Principle of Process Control. APC Techniques Dynamics 2-1. Page 2-1

Es e j4φ +4N n. 16 KE s /N 0. σ 2ˆφ4 1 γ s. p(φ e )= exp 1 ( 2πσ φ b cos N 2 φ e 0

Communication Theory Summary of Important Definitions and Results

Transcription:

VŠB echnical Uniersit of Ostraa Facult of mechanical Engineering Department of Control Sstems and Instrumentation Random disturbances in machines and production processes Prof. Ing. Jiří ůma, CSc.

Outline Introduction properties of random ariables Losses as a consequence of the random disturbance influence on production processes Loss reduction can be reached b Homogenization of input raw materials Controlling the production processes Homogenization heaps, continuous drum mixers and bins Control sstems

Statistical properties of random errors and disturbances ime histor Autocorrelation function Power spectral densit R ( τ) δ( τ) S( ω) time -τ τ -ω ω α τ R( τ) e α S ω ω α ( ) tim e -τ τ -ω ω lag frequenc Ealuation the ariance of the linear dnamic sstem output x ( jω) x ( jω) Sxx( ω) dω π π j c x ( z) ( z ) S ( z) x xx z dz

Losses as a consequence of the random disturbance influence on the production process ) Reduction the percentage of wastes 3) Loss reduction as a consequence of nonlinearit Example: controlled ariable ) Reduction the margin of materials controlled ariable controlled ariable Loss is proportional to the ariance of the fuel-air ratio.

Reduction ariation of production processes Homogenisation heaps, natural non-homogeneit x(m) otal mass... M Number of laers N Model (moing aerage) Homogenisation principles N * ( m) x ( m i M N ) N i N * x N N k (m) ransfer function for ariances ( km N ) ρ ( km N ) N log x x(m) M/N M/N 3M/N 4M/N m x * (m) M/N M/N 3M/N 4M/N m N ρ ( m) exp( α m ) Ealuation * ρ log( N ) ( m)... Homogenisation efficienc Limit efficienc f ( α M )

Reduction ariation of production processes wo-component homogenisation heap Input flow of different ores X a X b Component alternation: Modelled b the Marko chain p aa a a b a a b a. Rich ore b. Poor ore a p ab p ba b p bb m Homogenisation efficienc log x Quotient q has to be minimal q p ba pa p p Optimal input flow alternation: p p p, p a b laers ba ab b q bb Number of batches: 5

Reduction ariation of production processes Continuous mixing drums and bins x(t) I (s) k I (s) (t) Parameter identification Impulse response ~ probabilit densit function g () t k k ( k )! t k exp k t, t x(t), (t).. Some component content Ideal mixer Y () () s s I X () s s.. ime constant (retain time interal) Real mixer k Y () () s I s X () s ( s k) k Peclet number Mixing efficienc in the standard deiation ratio k,8 x,6 k 5,4, k Pe L D k α, k

Random disturbance and measurement error in automatic control sstems w Disturbance R S (ω) ω S δ Frequenc spectrum of the random process (pink noise) and step function 3..5..5..5 S(ω) ω α ω Measurement error S δδ (ω) ω -3α -α -α α α 3α ω Controller snthesis is focused on minimizing the effect of the disturbance and measurement error ariance on the controlled ariable ariance

Analsis of an effect resulting from controlling the static sstem with a transport dela b the PS-controller w - e PS Controller output: u Assessing the relationship between the disturbance and measurement error standard deiations: B ( E)( KE) 3 ( E( K R ) KE )( K )( K R) δ Let : E exp α ransfer function relating the disturbance ariance to the controlled ariable ariance : B δ u k Ke ( ) k R k i e i K R.8.6.4. 3 -.8.6.4. B 3 B 3 R K B - K R( K ) ( K )( K R) α α

Analsis of an effect resulting from controlling the integration sstem with a transport dela onl b using the feedback P-controller ŽH - K R..ř. Q i Q o - P Qo Let : Qo Qi Qo K E exp( α ), K K ransfer function relating the disturbance ariance to the controlled and actuating ariable ariance : ( E K )( K ) E( K ) ( K )( K )( E E K ) ( K )( E K ) KE( K ) ( K )( K )( E E K ) R - -.7 E E.8.9.9 Qi Qo..4.6.8 K

Analsis of an effect resulting from controlling the integration sstem with a transport dela b the feedback and forward P-controllers ŽH - K R..ř. δ Q i - Q o Qo P A Let : Qo ( ) E exp α δ K K Parameter assessing the relationship between the standard deiation of disturbance and measurement error: A Qo ransfer function relating the disturbance ariance to the controlled ariable ariance : K( E K ) KE( K ) ( K )( K )( E E K ) A K R - - A 5 5 K opt..4.6.8 5 E

Analsis of an effect resulting from controlling the first order sstem b a PI-controller w - e PI ransfer functions for the controller and plant: () R s K S () s I s s Controller tuning b emploing the inerse dnamic : I Let : ransfer function relating the disturbance ariance to the controlled ariable and actuating ariable ariance : α I u K( K α αi K ) ( K α )( α ( K ) K ) α K ( K α )( α ( K ) K ) α K K w ϕ α I - - -3 - - K,3,,3 3 φ 3 φ u I,3,,3 φ, w