BIAS EXTENSION TEST STANDARD

Similar documents
DEFORMATION PATTERN AND FAILURE CRITERIA OF WOVEN COMPOSITE PREFORM IN GENERAL BIAS EXTENSION

DRAPING SIMULATION. Recent achievements and future trends. Dr. Sylvain Bel LGCIE University Lyon 1

SHEAR TENSION COUPLING IN BIAXIAL BIAS EXTENSION TESTS

This is an author-deposited version published in: Eprints ID: 18486

Physical Properties Testing Technical Bulletin

INFLUENCE KINDS OF MATERIALS ON THE POISSON S RATIO OF WOVEN FABRICS

GB/T / ISO 527-1:1993

An overview of Carbon Fiber modeling in LS-DYNA. John Zhao October 23 th 2017

A cooperative benchmark effort on testing of woven composites

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF WOVEN WEBBINGS

Department of Textile Engineering. Curriculum for the Degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Textile: Textile Chemistry and Fiber Science

Normalisation Of Shear Test Data For Rate- Independent Compressible Fabrics

Modeling non-isothermal thermoforming of fabricreinforced thermoplastic composites

The bias-extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review

AN LS-DYNA USER DEFINED MATERIAL MODEL FOR LOOSELY WOVEN FABRIC WITH NON-ORTHOGONAL VARYING WEFT AND WARP ANGLE

Analysis of nonlinear shear deformations in CFRP and GFRP textile laminates

Measurement of meso-scale deformations for modelling textile composites

DAMAGE MECHANICS MODEL FOR OFF-AXIS FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF UNIDIRECTIONAL CARBON FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES AT ROOM AND HIGH TEMPERATURES

LOCKING AND STABILITY OF 3D TEXTILE COMPOSITE REINFORCEMENTS DURING FORMING

CHARACTERISING AND MODELLING TOOL-PLY FRICTION OF VISCOUS TEXTILE COMPOSITES

INVESTIGATION OF THE PROCESSING PARAMETERS OF A 3D WOVEN REINFORCEMENT

Reliable Test Results

The objective of this experiment is to investigate the behavior of steel specimen under a tensile test and to determine it's properties.

Keywords: textile composites, braided fabric, dynamic property, fracture aspect, matrix hybrid

24 th October 2008 Glasgow eprints Service

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 6

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

A Novel Approach for Measurement of Fiber-on-fiber Friction

Laboratory 4 Topic: Buckling

Simulated Effect of Fiber Mesh Wrap Angle on Composite Pressure Hose Behavior. David Nelson MSC.Software

STANDARD SAMPLE. Reduced section " Diameter. Diameter. 2" Gauge length. Radius

Equilibrium. the linear momentum,, of the center of mass is constant

THERMOFORMING SIMULATION OF THERMOPLASTIC TEXTILE COMPOSITES

TENSILE TESTS (ASTM D 638, ISO

INDUSTRIAL FORMING SIMULATION OF MULTI-LAYERED UD NON-CRIMP-FABRICS. 13. LS-DYNA FORUM, , BAMBERG.

Single fibre tensile testing

3-dimensional joint torque calculation of compression sportswear using 3D-CG human model

A SELF-INDICATING MODE I INTERLAMINAR TOUGHNESS TEST

MODELLING OF DRAPING AND DEFORMATION FOR TEXTILE COMPOSITES

FRICTION TESTING OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES

INSPIRE GK12 Lesson Plan. Elastic Deformation of Materials: An Investigation of Hooke s Law Length of Lesson

Measurement of Bone Strength and Stiffness using 3-Point Bending

Project PAJ2 Dynamic Performance of Adhesively Bonded Joints. Report No. 3 August Proposed Draft for the Revision of ISO

A rate-dependent Hosford-Coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture at high strain rates

Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method 1

Slow Velocity Flow Fields in Composite Materials

HexPly F655 Resin Systems for Advanced Composites

HIGH VELOCITY IMPACT ON TEXTILE REINFORCED COMPOSITES

Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil

Strain Measurement Techniques for Composite Coupon Testing

Flexural properties of polymers

DESIGN OF GRIPPER IN UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE

KINK BAND FORMATION OF FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (FRP)

SIMULATION OF THE PREFORMING STEP FOR FLAX DRY WOVEN FABRICS

Non-conventional Glass fiber NCF composites with thermoset and thermoplastic matrices. F Talence, France Le Cheylard, France

OPTIMAL FIBER PLACEMENT INCLUDING EFFECTS OF EMBROIDERY

Testing and Analysis

ISO 178 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Plastics Determination of flexural properties. Plastiques Détermination des propriétés en flexion

By drawing Mohr s circle, the stress transformation in 2-D can be done graphically. + σ x σ y. cos 2θ + τ xy sin 2θ, (1) sin 2θ + τ xy cos 2θ.

Prediction of fabric hand characteristics using extraction principle

USE OF DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION TO OBTAIN MATERIAL MODEL PARAMETERS FOR COMPOSITES

A simplified finite element model for draping of woven material

RESPONSE SURFACES OF MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF DRY WOVEN FABRICS UNDER COMBINED LOADINGS

Agnieszka Bondyra, Pawe Gotowicki

STATISTICAL BEHAVIOR OF HEMP AND SISAL FIBER REINFORCED POLYPROPYLENE COMPOSITES ABSTRACT

ELASTIC STAIBILITY CIF TUE FACINGS Of HAT SANDWICI-1 PANELS WIASI SUBJECTED TO COMBINED EDGEWISE STRESSES

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

BioMechanics and BioMaterials Lab (BME 541) Experiment #5 Mechanical Prosperities of Biomaterials Tensile Test

DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYZER DMA 2980

Elastic Properties of Solids (One or two weights)

THE MUTUAL EFFECTS OF SHEAR AND TRANSVERSE DAMAGE IN POLYMERIC COMPOSITES

In-situ local strain measurement in textile composites with embedded optical fibre sensors

POLYURETHANE SURFACE TREATMENT ON TWO KINDS OF BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES COMPARISON

THE SHEAR BEHAVIOR OBTAINED FROM THE DIRECT SHEAR AND PULLOUT TESTS FOR DIFFERENT POOR GRADED SOIL-GEOSYNTHETIC SYSTEMS

Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica Vol123 No12 April 2006

Nonlinearities in mechanical behavior of textile composites

Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004

Lab Exercise #3: Torsion

Project MMS13 Task 5 Report No 3 (M6/D3)

1 of 12. Given: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G

Supplementary Information. Multifunctional graphene woven fabrics

Experiment: Torsion Test Expected Duration: 1.25 Hours

CTC 460 kcmil ACCC Conductor Stress Strain Tests

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 1, January ISSN

Crashworthiness of Composite Structures with Various Fiber Architectures

Interface properties between a steel pre-stressing strand and an epoxy matrix.

Lab 5. Current Balance

3 Materials and methods

A Friction-Test Benchmark with Twintex PP

AERO 214. Lab II. Measurement of elastic moduli using bending of beams and torsion of bars

Torsion Wheel. Assembly Instructions. Parts

An Analytical Study of Initial Shear Behavior of Plain Woven Hybrid Fabrics

MULTI-SCALE MODELLING OF FIBRE BUNDLES

The Relationship between the Applied Torque and Stresses in Post-Tension Structures

2 Experiment of GFRP bolt

Motion in Two Dimensions: Centripetal Acceleration

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF COMPOSITE PIN- JOINTS AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION

Experiments and prediction of the spreading behavior of fibrous tows by means of the Discrete Element Method

Difference Between Fixed and Floating Reference Points AASHTO T-321

For ASME Committee use only.

Transcription:

BIAS EXTENSION TEST STANDARD Xiongqi Peng and Jian Cao Advanced Materials Processing Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern University Evanston, IL August 2003 For Internal Use 1. Purpose To measure the in-plane combined shearing and tensile response of textile composite materials to testing displacement and velocity. 2. Experimental Set-up and Sample Preparation A sample of material, with the dimension of the test sample in the loading direction relatively greater than the width, and the yarns initially oriented at ± 45-degrees to the loading direction, is gripped at two ends (see Fig. 1). A tensile force is applied at the gripper. The force required to deform the material is recorded at the gripper as a function of gripper displacement. Figure 1. Bias extension set-up Great care should be given to make sure that fiber yarns are oriented ± 45-degrees to the edges. Any small misalignment will lead to tensile or compressive forces in the fiber directions, resulting in large scatter in measured force readings. 1

K H D C I E B L F A G J Figure 2. Bias extension sample A special recommendation is made for the specimen preparing of balanced woven composites. Here, we provide a general procedure for preparing bias extension test specimen for balanced woven composites (refer to Fig. 2), based on our experience, by following this procedure, the sample will have an aspect ratio of two and it will greatly improve the repeatability of testing results. 1) On a composite fabric, draw a line along the weft direction from point A to point B. Count the yarn number in this direction, take 16 yarns as an example. 2) Extend line AB to point C along the weft yarn direction by another 16 yarns. 3) Count 16 yarns from point B in the warp direction to obtain point D and point G. 4) Follow the same procedure to draw lines DEF and AEH. 5) Draw lines connecting points C and H, H and F, F and G, and G and C. 6) Extend line HC in two ends to points K and I, respectively, and extend line FG in two ends to point J and L, respectively, to generate two grip regions for the grippers. 7) Connect KL and IJ. 8) Use tape to cover the grip regions before cutting the sample. This can prevent the fiber yarn loose of the sample. 9) Cut sample along lines KI, LJ, JL and LK. For dry textiles, pre-conditioning (pulling the specimen in the gripper several times prior to collecting data) is not recommended as this pre-conditioning will incur fiber yarn slippage along corners of the gripper regions (around H, F, C and G) and thus damage the testing specimen. 2

As a rule, the sample should be gripped to ensure no slippage between the tows of the sample and the gripper during the testing. No slackness of the sample before testing should be allowed. 3. Definitions For the purposes of this standard, the following definitions apply: The material shear angle is defined as (see Fig. 3), π θ = 2Φ (1) 2 where Φ is the central region (pure shear) angle and can be calculated from the gripper displacement using, W + D Φ = arccos (2) 2W where D is the gripper displacement and W is the width of the sample. D 2Ф H=2W W Figure 3. Deformation of bias samples 3

The angular shear rate in the material is defined as, & θ = 2D (3) 2 2 W + D W 2 where D & is the gripper displacement rate. It must be noted that the above derivation for the shear angle is based on some ideal assumptions. 4. Required Report Items Geometry: o W: sample width o H: sample height o N 1 and N 2 : Numbers of fiber yarns in the center shear zone in two directions Testing conditions: o Diagram and description of test device o Method of clamping o Special treatment applied to the sample if any o Test speed Test Results: o Raw data: Load versus head displacement of every test. CAUTION: Assuming that at the beginning of a test, every detail is taken care of, report all the test results. Do not delete any one of test results afterwards simply because it does not match the other similar tests. You may provide a justification and discard the result from a particular test when reporting processed data, but not when reporting the original raw data. o Processed data: Load versus shear angle o Temperature profile o Any slippage 4

o Measured shear angle if applicable. o Evolution of dimension AD (Fig.2) with respect to the head displacement Processing Method: o Measurement techniques, especially if strain is measured directly. o Definition of quantities to be measured and procedure for obtaining these from raw data 5. Apparatus Testing machine: any suitable tensile testing instrument. If the testing machine cannot provide grippers wide enough for the specimen, custom-made grippers are necessary. Environmental chamber or oven for heating of thermoplastic or thermoset prepreg samples if required. Computer to log measured displacement and force. 6. Test Procedure The alignment of the testing apparatus is crucial to the prevention of buckling of the testing specimen. Always do a good alignment before any tests. Specifically, make sure that surfaces X and Y are in the same plane (see Fig. 4) and coincide with the testing plane of the testing machine. Surface X Surface Y Figure 4. Alignment of grippers in bias extension 5

In the absence of an obvious preferred testing speed, a normalized gripper 1 displacement rate of 1 s is recommended, i.e. D & 1 1 (4) W = s For prepregs the material temperature during testing should be measured. As the oven temperature can often lag behind the material temperature, use of a temperature probe is recommended, i.e. a thermocouple embedded in the test material. Note that for thin materials, embedding the thermocouple can be difficult due to the narrow thickness of the material test sheet. In this case, sandwiching the thermocouple between two sheets of the material is recommended (the sheets can be held together using large staples). The probe should be positioned in the oven at the initial mid-way height of the sample. Data collection: monitor the force and crosshead displacement throughout the test. Test termination: usually the normalized gripper displacement should be greater than 0.35, i.e. W = 0. 35 before ending the test. This corresponds to a shear angle o of approximately55. Record the gripper displacement at the point of sample buckling if it happens. Measure the shrinkage between points A and D in Fig. 2. At least 5 repeats should be conducted under identical conditions. Ideally results should be presented for all tests; if not, the median curve should be presented along with error bars representing minimum and maximum force readings at 5 equally spaced displacements (or shear angles). 6