arxiv:dg-ga/ v2 15 Dec 1995

Similar documents
Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Introduction to Selberg Trace Formula.

THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups

Representations Are Everywhere

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

ON A SPECTRAL ANALOGUE OF THE STRONG MULTIPLICITY ONE THEOREM. 1. Introduction

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

Non separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

p-summable COMMUTATORS IN DIMENSION d

Invariants from noncommutative index theory for homotopy equivalences

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

STABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION. James Arthur University of Toronto

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

Representation Theory

Lie groupoids, cyclic homology and index theory

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 26 Feb 2009

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

K-Homology, Assembly and Rigidity Theorems for Relative Eta Invariants

TATE CONJECTURES FOR HILBERT MODULAR SURFACES. V. Kumar Murty University of Toronto

Intertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups

A Gauss-Bonnet theorem for constructible sheaves on reductive groups

Hodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Rigidity, locally symmetric varieties and the Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture

Math 210C. The representation ring

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

Kleine AG: Travaux de Shimura

Unitarity of non-spherical principal series

Induced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

VERLINDE ALGEBRA LEE COHN. Contents

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms

On the geometric Langlands duality

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

( files chap2 to chap

THE RESIDUAL EISENSTEIN COHOMOLOGY OF Sp 4 OVER A TOTALLY REAL NUMBER FIELD

CONVERGENCE OF ZETA FUNCTIONS OF GRAPHS. Introduction

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

The Spinor Representation

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

New York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Invariant Distributions and Gelfand Pairs

Raising the Levels of Modular Representations Kenneth A. Ribet

On the non-semisimple contributions to Selberg zeta functions

AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.

Approximating Fourier transformation of orbital integrals

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

TRANSVERSAL DIRAC OPERATORS ON DISTRIBUTIONS, FOLIATIONS, AND G-MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 28 Jan 2009

Fourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups. Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota

Isolated cohomological representations

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES

Zeta functions of buildings and Shimura varieties

DIRAC OPERATORS AND LIE ALGEBRA COHOMOLOGY

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Talk at Workshop Quantum Spacetime 16 Zakopane, Poland,

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

NOTES ON HOLOMORPHIC PRINCIPAL BUNDLES OVER A COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLD

Linear connections on Lie groups

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface

Demushkin s Theorem in Codimension One

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Killing fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

AN ASPHERICAL 5-MANIFOLD WITH PERFECT FUNDAMENTAL GROUP

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh

BRANCHING LAWS FOR SOME UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF SL(4,R)

The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion

Transcription:

arxiv:dg-ga/9512001v2 15 Dec 1995 On the index of Dirac operators on arithmetic quotients Anton Deitmar Math. Inst. d. Univ., INF 288, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany ABSTRACT: Using the Arthur-Selberg trace formula we express the index of a Dirac operator on an arithmetic quotient manifold as the integral over the index form plus a sum of orbital integrals. For the Euler operator these orbital integrals are shown to vanish for products of certain rank one spaces. In this case the index theorem looks exactly as in the compact case. Contents 1 Homogeneous Dirac operators and their index kernels 2 2 The G-index 7 3 The index theorem 8 4 The Euler operator 9 Introduction Index theorems for noncompact but finite volume locally symmetric spaces Y are usually of the form ind(d) = ω + error terms, Y where ω is the local index form of the elliptic differential operator D. The error terms are associated to the cusps. F. Hirzebruch [15] used resolution of cusp-singularities to show that in the case of Hilbert modular surfaces and their signature operators the error 1

ON THE INDEX... 2 terms can be given as special values of L-functions. Using the Selberg trace formula this was extended to higher dimensional Hilbert modular varieties by W. Müller [18]. Also by means of the Selberg trace formula D. Barbasch and H. Moscovici [7] showed index theorems for real rank one spaces. A detailed analysis of the geometry of arithmetic quotient varieties led M. Stern [20], [21] to index theorems of the above type. By means of the adelic trace formula J.P. Labesse [16] investigated the index of the signature operator focussing on the representation theoretic aspects. In this paper we will use Arthur s formula [3] to give a geometric index formula of the above type for Dirac operators. The advantage of this index formula is that in some cases like products of real hyperbolic spaces the vanishing of the error term can be read off. The most important example for this is the Euler operator D e = d + d as operator from even to odd forms. In the compact case one has indd e = ω = χ(y), Y whereω istheeulerformandχ(y) thetopological Eulercharacteristic. The first equality is the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, the second the Gauss- Bonnet equality. In the case of arithmetic quotients G. Harder [11] has shown that the second equality also holds in the noncompact case. One might wonder whether the first also carries over to noncompact arithmetic quotients. In this paper we show that the first equality holds in case of products of rank one spaces modulo arithmetic groups coming from totally real number fields with at lest two real embeddings. This contains the case of Hilbert modular varieties. 1 Homogeneous Dirac operators and their index kernels An arithmetic quotient is a quotient manifold X Γ = Γ\X of a globally symmetric space X by a torsion-free arithmetic group Γ. The space X is assumed not to have compact or euclidean factors. Under these circumstances the space X can be written as homogeneous space X = G/K, where G is a semisimple real reductive group acting transitively by isometries and K is a maximal compact subgroup of G. The group Γ is an arithmetic subgroup of G. To be able to use adelic methods we will further assume that Γ is a congruence subgroup, i.e. there is a semisimple linear algebraic group G

ON THE INDEX... 3 over Q with G = G(R), a compact open subgroup K Γ of G(A fin ), where A fin is the ring of finite adeles over Q such that Γ = G(Q) K Γ. In order to have strong approximation available we will also assume the group G to be simply connected. Since the indices of homogeneous Dirac operators are known to vanish otherwise we will assume rank G = rank K. On the group G(A) we have a unique Haar measure given by a rational top differential form. This measure is also called the Tamagawa measure. We will distribute the Tamagawa measure to the factors G(R) and G(A fin ) in a way that on G = G(R) we have the Euler-Poincaré measure given by vol(γ\g) = ( 1) dimx 2 χ(x Γ ), where χ denotes the Euler-Poincaré characteristic. It suffices to insist this formula to hold for cocompact torsion free lattices Γ but for arithmetic ones which are not cocompact it holds as well ([11]). Let g 0 = k 0 p 0 denote the polar decomposition of the real Lie algebra g 0 of G where k 0 := Lie R K and p 0 is the orthogonal complement of k 0 with respect to the Killing form B of g 0. Let g = k p denote the complexified version. Since G and K have the same rank there is a Cartan subgroup T of G which is contained in K. Let t denote the complex Lie algebra of T. Choose an orderingon the root system Φ(g,t). Since p is stable underad(t) it follows that this choice induces a decomposition p = p + p according to positive and negative root spaces. This decomposition is a polarization of the quadratic space (B,p) and thus the space S := p becomes a module under the Clifford algebra Cl(B, p). Since G is simply connected the homomorphism K SO(p) given by the adjoint action factors over the spin group Spin(p) Cl(B,p). So K acts on S. The same applies to p + and the K-action on the space p p + = p coincides with the adjoint action. The action of K on S leaves invariant the subspaces S + := even p, S := odd p. Let (τ,v τ ) be an irreducible unitary representation of K then the K- representations S ± τ define homogeneous vector bundles E(S ± τ) over X whose smooth sections can by identified with the K-invariants: (C (G) S ± τ) K,

ON THE INDEX... 4 where K acts on C (G) by right shifts. The same applies to S and we have E(S τ) = E(S τ) E(S + τ). Let the Lie algebra g act on C (G) by left invariant vector fields, i.e. Xf(g) := d dt t=0f(gexp(tx)) for X g and f C (G). Let (X j ) 1 j dimx denote an orthonormal basis of p the we have the Dirac operator acting on C (E(S τ)): D τ := dimx j=0 X j c(x j ) 1, where we have written c(x j ) for the Clifford action of X j p Cl(B,p) on S. Clearly D τ commutes C (E(S + τ)) and C (E(S τ)) and we will write D ± τ for the restriction of D τ to C (E(S ± τ)). Then D + τ and D τ are adjoints of each other. The homogeneous bundle E(S τ) pushes down to a bundle E Γ (S τ) over X Γ whose space of smooth sections can be identified with (C (Γ\G) S τ) K. In [17] it is proven that there is a compactly supported smooth function g τ such that trπ(g τ ) = dim(v π S + V τ ) K dim(v π S V τ ) K. We want to show that trπ(g τ ) vanishes for a principal series representation π. To this end let P = MAN beaparabolic subgroupwith A exp(p). Let (ξ,v ξ ) denote an irreducible unitary representation of M and e ν a quasicharacter of A. Let π ξ,ν := Ind G P ξ eν+ρ P 1. Lemma 1.1 We have trπ ξ,ν (g τ ) = 0. Proof: By Frobenius reciprocity we have Hom K (γ,π ξ,ν K ) = Hom KM (γ KM,ξ), where K M := K M the claim will follow from S + KM = S KM. To prove this let 0 ω p be in the image of the projection of a := LieA to p. Then K M acts trivially on Cω p. Let W p be a K M -complement to Cω then p = W ω W and so S + = even W ω odd W = KM odd W ω even W = S. For any unitary representation π of G we define the Dirac operator D τ,π := dimx j=0 π(x j ) c(x j ) 1

ON THE INDEX... 5 acting on (π S τ) K. Write D ± τ,π for the restriction to (π S ± τ) K. If kerd + τ,π and kerd τ,π are finite dimensional we define indd + τ,π := dimkerd+ τ,π dimkerd τ,π. Lemma 1.2 For π Ĝ the kernel of D τ,π is finite dimensional and we have indd + τ,π = trπ(g τ ). Proof: SinceK-types have finitemultiplicities in π it follows that (π S τ) K is finite dimensional. On this finite dimensional space the operators D τ,π + and D τ,π are adjoints of each other, so indd + τ,π = dimkerd τ,πd + τ,π dimkerd + τ,πd τ,π = dimkerd 2 τ,π (π S + τ) dimkerd 2 τ,π (π S τ). The formula of Parthasarathy [19] (see also [5]) implies D 2 τ,π = π(c)+τ(c K )+B(ρ K ) B(ρ) (π S τ) K, where C and C K are the Casimir operators of G and K. This gives the claim. The Dirac operator for the G-representation on L 2 (Γ\G) will be denoted D τ,γ. Recall that L 2 (Γ\G) decomposes as L 2 (Γ\G) = L 2 (Γ\G) disc L 2 (Γ\G) cont, where L 2 (Γ\G) disc, the discrete part, is the sum of all irreducible subrepresentations of L 2 (Γ\G) and L 2 (Γ\G) cont is a continuous Hilbert integral extended over the principal series. Let R(g τ ) denote the convolution operator ϕ ϕ ğ τ, where ğ τ (x) := g τ (x 1 ). Then R(g τ ) = R cont (g τ )+R disc (g τ ) accordingly and Lemma 1.1 implies that R cont (g τ ) = 0. Further Theorem 7.1 of [3] says that R(g τ ) = R disc (g τ ) is a trace class operator. Therefore it follows Lemma 1.3 The spaces kerd + τ,γ L2 (Γ\G) and kerd τ,γ L2 (Γ\G) are finite dimensional. Denote the difference of their dimensions by indd + τ,γ then indd + τ,γ = tr(g τ L 2 (Γ\G)).

ON THE INDEX... 6 The association τ g τ extends to virtual representations by linearity. Consider the virtual representation of K on S + S. We define It follows that for π Ĝ we have trπf τ = dimx q=0 f τ := g τ (S + S ). ( 1) q dim(v π q p V τ ) K. An element g of G is called elliptic if it lies in a compact subgroup of G. For any g G and a compactly supported smooth function f on G let O g (f) := f(xgx 1 )dx G/G g denote the orbital integral. The required normalization of Haar measures of G and G g follows [13]. From [10] we take Proposition 1.4 Let g be a semisimple element of the group G. If g is not elliptic, the orbital integrals O g (f σ ) and O g (g τ ) vanish. If g is elliptic we may assume g T, where T is a Cartan in K and then we have for all elliptic g and O g (f σ ) = tr σ(g) W(t,g g) α Φ + g (ρ g,α) [G g : G 0 g]c g, O g (g τ ) = tr τ(g) det(1 g 1 p + ), if g is regular elliptic. For general elliptic g we have O g (g τ ) = s W(T,K) det(s) ω gg sλτ+ρ ρ K [G g : G 0 g]c g g ρ α φ + φ + g (1 g α ), where c g is Harish-Chandra s constant, it does only depend on the centralizer G g of g. Its value is given in [9], further ω γ is the differential operator as in [12] p.33.

ON THE INDEX... 7 Corollary 1.5 If G is a product of real rank one groups then the orbital integral O g (f τ ) vanishes also for g non-semisimple. Proof: It suffices to assume that the real rank of G is one. Consider a non-semisimple element g. By [6], sec. 6 we get a curve t z t of semisimple elements and a natural number m such that O g (f τ ) = lim t 0 t m/2 O zt (f τ ). The function x O x (f τ ) is bounded on semisimple elements by the proposition and therefore we have O g (f τ ) = 0 for g non semisimple. Conjecture 1.6 The above corollary holds for all groups G. 2 The G-index Let R G B(L 2 (G)) denote the von Neumann algebra defined as the commutant of the left representation of G on L 2 (G). On R G there is a canonical faithful, normal, semi-finite trace tr G, called the G-trace, uniquely determined by the property that tr G (R(f) R(f)) = f(g) 2 dg, where R denotes the right representation of G (See [8]). Let dim G denote the dimension defined by the G-trace. Choose a compact form G d of G in a way that G d contains the compact group K. The homogeneous space X d = G d /K then is symmetric and is called the dual symmetric space to X. Let λ = λ τ denote the infinitesimal character of τ then λ also defines an infinitesimal character of some irreducible representation W λ of G d. Proposition 2.1 The spaces kerd τ ± L 2 (E(S ± τ)) are finite-dimensional under dim G. Let ind G (D τ + ) denote the G-index of D+ τ, which is, by definition, the difference of these two G-dimensions. Then if λ is regular with respect to the full root system we have G ind G (D + τ ) = dimw λ χ(x d ), where χ(x d ) is the Euler-characteristic of X d. If λ is not regular, the G- index of D + τ vanishes.

ON THE INDEX... 8 It is known that the Euler characteristic is positive and that χ(x d ) = W(T,G d ), where T is a Cartan subgroup of G d. Proof: The finite dimensionality is Lemma 3.2 in [8]. The index formula follows from formulas (3.7)-(3.13) of [5]. 3 The index theorem Assume now that G is the restriction to Q of some algebraic group H over a number field F. It is known that the index of the Dirac operator D τ,γ vanishes if rankg > rankk. If F has a complex place then it follows rankg > rankk. So, in order to have a nontrivial theory we will assume the field F to be totally real. Let S denote the set of archimedian places of F. We assume that S has at least two elements. Theorem 3.1 The index of the operator D + τ,γ is given by ind(d + τ,γ ) = ind G(D + τ )χ(x Γ)+R(τ,Γ), where the error term R(τ, Γ) equals R(τ,Γ) = γ Γ ns/g a(γ)o γ (g τ ). The sum is extended over the set of non-semisimple elements Γ ns of Γ modulo the equivalence relation (G, S) defined in [3] The constant a(γ) coincides with a G (S,γ) of [3] up to a volume factor. Note that the first summand on the right hand side of the index formula also coincides with the integral X Γ ω, where ω is the index form of D τ. This also equals the Γ-index [4] of D τ +, so we have ind(d τ,γ + ) = ind Γ(D τ + )+ R(τ,Γ). Proof: Let K Γ be the compact open subgroup of G(A fin ) such that Γ = K Γ G(Q). Define a compactly supported function f on G(A) by 1 f = f fin f, where f fin := vol(k Γ ) 1 K Γ and f := g τ. Plug the function f into Theorem 7.1 (b) of [3]. Then use Corollary 1.5. Unfortunately the constants a(γ) are not easy to compute (see the comment on page 209 of [2]). In simple cases like G = Res F/Q SL 2 however,one will probably be able to get more explicit expressions. In this paper we will be more interested in the vanishing of R(τ,Γ).

ON THE INDEX... 9 Corollary 3.2 In the case G = Res F/G SO(n,1) for n 3, the error term vanishes. Here SO(n,1) stands for the special orthogonal group of a quadratic form which has signature (n,1) over the reals. This extends Thm 7.5 of [7]. Proof: Proposition 1.4 and sec. 6 of [6] imply that R(τ,Γ) = 0 if K has discrete center. The latter condition is satisfied for SO(n, 1). 4 The Euler operator Consider the homogeneous vector bundle E = E(τ) associated with the representation τ. Choose a homogeneous connection on E(τ). Those always exist and in case that τ = σ K, where σ is a finite dimensional representation of G there is a unique flat homogeneous connection. This is the case considered in[21]. The choice of a connection gives us an exterior differential d : Ω. (E) Ω.+1 (E). The representation τ being unitary gives us a homogeneous hermitian metric on E and we can define the formal adjoint d of d and the Euler operator: D e τ := d+d : Ω even (E) Ω odd (E). We now come to the main result of this paper: Theorem 4.1 Assume that G = Res F/Q H, where H is a semisimple connected linear algebraic group over the totally real number field F. Assume F has at least two real embeddings and H is over R a product of rank one groups. Let G := G(R) and X = G/K the symmetric space attached to G. Let Γ a torsion free congruence subgroup of G. Write X Γ = Γ\X for the quotient manifold. Let E(τ) be a homogeneous vector bundle over X given by a unitary finite dimensional representation τ of the compact group K and let D e τ,γ be the Euler operator of the pushdown of E(τ) to X Γ then D e τ,γ has a well defined index and ind(d e τ,γ) = ind G (D e τ)χ(x Γ ). Corollary 4.2 Assume Conjecture 1.6 holds. Then the condition on G in the above theorem can be removed.

ON THE INDEX... 10 Proof: The index of Dτ,Γ e coincides with the index of D+ τ,γ, where τ is the virtual representation τ (S + S + ). With Lemma 1.3 it follows that the index exists. The index theorem tells us that ind(d e τ,γ ) = ind G(D e τ )χ(x Γ)+R( τ,γ). Corollary 1.5 tells us that R( τ,γ) = 0. Corollary 4.3 For the usual Euler operator D e Γ on X Γ we have ind(d e Γ ) = χ(x Γ). Proof: This corollary is clearly valid for cocompact groups Γ. This implies that the G-index must be one. References [1] Arthur, J.: A trace formula for reductive groups I: Terms associated to classes in G(Q). Duke Math. J. 45, 911-952 (1978). [2] Arthur, J.: On a family of distributions obtained from orbits. Can. J. Math. 38, 179-214 (1986). [3] Arthur, J.: The invariant trace formula II. Global theory. J. AMS 1, 501-554 (1988). [4] Atiyah, M.: Elliptic Operators, Discrete Groups and Von Neumann Algebras. Soc. Math. Fr. Asterisque 32-33. [5] Atiyah, M.; Schmid, W.: A Geometric Construction of the Discrete Series for Semisimple Lie Groups. Invent. math. 42, 1-62 (1977). [6] Barbasch, D.: Fourier inversion for unipotent invariant integrals. Transactions of the AMS 249, 51-83 (1979). [7] Barbasch, D.; Moscovici, H.: L 2 -Index and the Selberg Trace Formula. J. Func. An. 53, 151-201 (1983). [8] Connes, A.; Moscovici, H.: The L 2 -index theorem for homogeneous spaces of Lie groups. Ann. Math. 115. 291-330 (1982). [9] Deitmar, A.: Higher torsion zeta functions. Adv. Math. 110, 109-128 (1995). [10] Deitmar, A.: Holomorphic Torsion for Hermitian Symmetric Spaces. preprint. [11] Harder, G.: A Gauss-Bonnet formula for discrete arithmetically defined groups. Ann. Sci. ENS 4, 409-455 (1971).

ON THE INDEX... 11 [12] Harish-Chandra: Discrete series for semisimple Lie groups II. Acta Math. 116, 1-111 (1966). [13] Harish-Chandra: Harmonic analysis on real reductive groups I. The theory of the constant term. J. Func. Anal. 19, 104-204 (1975). [14] Harish-Chandra: Supertempered distributions on real reductive groups. Studies in Appl. Math., Adv. in Math., Supplementary Studies Series, Vol 8, Acad. Press 139-153 (1983). [15] Hirzebruch, F.: Hilbert modular surfaces. Enseignment Math. 19, 183-281 (1973). [16] Labesse, J.P.: Signature des variétés modulaires de Hilbert et representations diédrales. Luminy 1989, SLN 1447, 249-260 (1990). [17] Labesse, J.P.: Pseudo-coefficients très cuspidaux et K-théorie. Math. Ann. 291, 607-616 (1991). [18] Müller, W.: Signature defects of cusps of Hilbert modular varieties and values of L-series at s = 1. J. Diff. Geom. 20, 55-119 (1984). [19] Parthasarathy, R.: Dirac operators and the discrete series. Ann. Math. 103, 375-394 (1976). [20] Stern, M.: L 2 -index theorems on locally symmetric spaces. Invent. Math. 96, 231-282 (1989). [21] Stern, M.: Lefschetz formulae for arithmetic varieties. Invent. math. 115, 241-296 (1994). Version: June 2, 2018