Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Similar documents
Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Super/Hyper-Kamiokande

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment. Francesca Di Lodovico Queen Mary University of London

Hyper-Kamiokande R&D. Francesca Di Lodovico (QMUL) on behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande working groups

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Hyper-K physics potentials and R&D

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Study of possible opportunities for leptonic CP violation and mass hierarchy at LNGS

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

UNO: Underground Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Observatory

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

Next-Generation Water Cherenkov Detectors (1) Hyper-Kamiokande

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Long baseline experiments

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

JHFnu at J-PARC neutrino oscillation experiment

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 23 Jan 2017

The LENA Neutrino Observatory

Leïla Haegel University of Geneva

T2K neutrino oscillation results

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Final results from K2K and status of T2K

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

Sterile Neutrino Experiments at Accelerator

Today: Part I: Neutrino oscillations: beam experiments. Part II: Next tutorials: making distributions with histograms and ntuples

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

The DAEδALUS at Hyper-K Experiment: Searching for CP Violation. Mike Shaevitz - Columbia University for the DAEδALUS ALUS Collaboration

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Outline. (1) Physics motivations. (2) Project status

M.Nakahata. Kamioka observatory ICRR/IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo. 2016/11/8 M. Nakahata: Neutrino experiments - 30 years at Kamioka 1

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Technological challenges of future Super Beam projects

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Super-K Gd. M.Ikeda(ICRR) for Super-K collaboration Workshop for Neutrino Programs with facilities in Japan

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

Effect of systematics in T2HK, T2HKK, DUNE

Comparisons and Combinations of Oscillation Measurements

Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

What should be considered and improved for CP study.

Impression of NNN05. Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK. April 7-9, 2005 NNN05 Aussois, Savoie, France. K. Nakamura NNN05, Aussois, April 7-9,

Oak Ridge and Neutrinos eharmony forms another perfect couple

Future Experiments with Super Neutrino Beams

Leptons and the Weak Interaction

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Mar 2004

Past, Present and Future of long baseline neutrino experiments. Apero SPP 16 September 2016 S.Bolognesi (CEA)

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

K2K and T2K experiments

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

KamLAND. Studying Neutrinos from Reactor

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

Wei Wang University of Wisconsin-Madison. NNN09, Estes Park, Colorado, Oct 8, 2009

DAEδALUS. Janet Conrad LNS Seminar March 16, 2010

Current status of T2K experiment

ScienceDirect. The LAGUNA-LBNO Project

Transcription:

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan Gianfranca De Rosa Univ. Federico II and INFN Naples On behalf of Hyper-Kamiokande Collaboration

Hyper-Kamiokande: overview Hyper-Kamiokande is a multipurpose Water-Cherenkov detector with a variety of scientific goals: Neutrino oscillations (atmospheric, accelerator and solar); Neutrino astrophysics; Proton decay; Non-standard physics. Atmospheric n Supernova n Solar n Accelerator n

Hyper-Kamiokande: overview Total Volume : Inner Volume : Fiducial Volume : Photo sensors : Inner detector: Outer detector: Nominal site : 0.99 Mton 0.75 Mton 0.56 Mton (0.056x10) SK-type PMTs 99,000 20 PMTs 25,000 8 PMTs Tochibora mine 2 tanks lying along-side, divided in 10 compartments; Compartments are optically separated; egg-shape cross section; 20% photocatode-coverage; Fiducial volume: 25 times larger than Super-Kamiokande; Detector simulation studied with WCSim (open-source water Cherenkov detector Simulation program based on Geant4); Water Cherenkov: proved technology and scalability Excellent PID at sub-gev region (quasielastic single ring: PID > 99%); Large mass statistics always critical for any measurement

Hyper-Kamiokande Timeline International proto-collaboration has been formed (13 countries, 250 members); Work ongoing worldwide in all the aspects of the experiment; Cooperation with KEK-IPNS/ICRR to develop the project; Design Report being prepared in 2015; Once the budget is approved, the construction can start in 2018 and data taking around 2025.

Tokai-to-Hyper-Kamiokande (T2HK) long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Upgraded facility at J-PARC will deliver a muon (anti-)neutrino beam towards Hyper-K ( 0.75MW, 1.56 10 22 protons on target with 30 GeV proton beam); 2.5 o off-axis narrow-band beam: Suppresses high energy background; E ν 0.6 GeV peak at oscillation maximum; Pure ν μ beam with < 1% n e contamination. new power upgrade plan of J-PARC we expect ~>900kW by 2020, and ~1.3MW by ~2024

T2HK Near and intermediate detectors Different options for near detectors (at 280 m) are being investigated: - Upgraded INGRID (on axis detector for beam mean energy measurements) and ND280 (off axis detector for neutrino flux measurement and constraint of systematic uncertainties); - Addition of new detectors, like a 3D grid-like neutrino near detector with a water target (WAGASCI*), a high pressure TPC or a water-based liquid scintillation detector. Add new water-based intermediate (1-2 km) detector to better constraint uncertainties on flux and cross-section. nuprism (arxiv:1412.3086 [physics.ins-det]) Water column detector to minimise dependence on n interaction sampling the beam at several off-axis angles TITUS (arxiv:1504.08272 [physics.ins-det]) A water Cherenkov detector Gd doped, surrounded by Muon Range Detector, to minimise systematic errors

Physics potential Sensitive to CPV with less matter effect Off-axis beam with relatively short baseline Best matched with low energy, narrow band beam Assumptions: Integrated beam power: 7.5 MW 10 7 sec (i.e. 0.75 MW for 10 years running) 1.56 10 22 POT; n running / n running 1:3; Physics potential evaluated with a simultaneous fit of the appearance and disappearance spectra; Realistic estimation of the systematic uncertainties (based on the experience of T2K). For details see Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (2015) 053C02.

Systematic uncertainties Systematic errors extrapolated from well-established T2K analysis, with reasonable improvements: Flux and ND constrained uncertainties conservatively assumed to be the same as T2K; ND-independent cross-section uncertainties assumed improvements due to availability of water target and new samples in ND; Far detector uncertainties reduced due to availability of larger samples at HK near detectors and atmospheric events for systematics studies. n mode n mode Flux ND-independent &ND-constrained cross section Far detector Total App 3.0% 1.2% 0.7% 3.3% Disapp 2.8% 1.5% 1.0% 3.3% App 5.6% 2.0% 1.7% 6.2% Disapp 4.2% 1.4% 1.1% 4.5%

n e appearance Appearance n mode Appearance n mode large fiducial mass and high-power J-PARC neutrino beam Large statistics! Dominant background is intrinsic n e contamination in beam; In anti-neutrino mode also larger wrong-sign background. Suppression of mis-identified p 0 from improved p 0 rejection. signal n m n e n m n e Background n m / n m CC n e / n e CC Normal mass hierarchy with sin 2 2q 13 = 0.1 and d CP = 0 are assumed NC BGTotal Total n mode 3016 28 11 523 172 706 3750 n mode 396 2110 9 618 265 891 3397

Effect of d CP at Hyper-Kamiokande Neutrino mode: Appearance Antineutrino mode: Appearance

n m disappearance expected number of n m candidate events n mode n mode n m CC n m CC n e CC n e CC NC n m n e total n mode 17225 1088 11 1 999 49 19372 n mode 10066 15597 7 7 1281 6 26964

Sensitivity to d CP 76% (58%) of d CP space covered at 3s (5s) with better than 19 degrees uncertainty for 7.5MW10 7 s Assuming sin 2 2q 13 = 0.1, sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 and Dm 2 = 0.0024 ev Fraction of d CP space for which sin d CP = 0 can be excluded with 3s/5s 1s uncertainty as a function of the integrated beam power.

Sensitivity to q 23 and Dm 2 32 Octant degeneracy resolved with a constraint from reactor experiments Expected 1s uncertainty of sin 2 q 23 and Dm 2 32 uncertainty of Dm 2 32 better than 1.5 x 10-5 ev 2 for NH/IH True sin 2 q 23 sin 2 q Dm 2 32 (10-5 23 ) true values sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 and Dm 2 32 = 2.4 10 3 ev 2 Without reactor 0.45 0.006 1.4 0.50 0.015 1.4 0.55 0.009 1.5 With reactor true values sin 2 q 23 = 0.45 and Dm 2 32 = 2.4 10 3 ev 2 Reactor constraint on sin 2 2q 13 = 0.1 ± 0.005 is imposed

Sensitivity to Mass Hierarchy Use atmospheric neutrinos to determine mass hierarchy; 3s after 10 years data taking for sin 2 q 23 > 0.42 (0.43) for NH (IH) Significance of MH determination as a function of the Hyper-K lifetime

Accelerator and Atmospheric data If mass hierarchy unknown, several minima because unable to separate CP violation from matter effects. Combination of accelerator and atmospheric data resolves ambiguity!

Summary The Hyper-Kamiokande experiment offers a variety of physics goals, in particular measurement of neutrino oscillation: 76% (58%) of d CP space covered at 3σ (5σ) with better than 19 degrees uncertainty; If mass hierarchy is not known, Hyper-K can reject wrong hierarchy with more than 3σ; Resolve q 23 octant degeneracy with help of reactor constraint on q 13 ; Very broad physics potential (solar neutrinos, supernova neutrinos, proton decay, etc.); Data taking starts around 2025 according to current schedule.

Backup slides

SK vs. HK SK HK Total volume 50 kt 990 kt 20x SK Fiducial volume 22.5 kt 560 kt 25x SK PMTs 11k 20 99k 20 (20% coverage)

Neutrino and anti-neutrino flux with J-PARC beam Neutrino flux is estimated by T2K collaboration by tuning MC modeling of hadronic interactions to NA61/SHINE data. T2K flux simulation used with the horn currents raised from 250 ka to 320 ka Predicted uncertainty on the neutrino flux calculation assuming that replica target hadron production data are available

Oscillation parameters in the fit Oscillation parameters used for the sensitivity analysis and treatment in the fitting

Expected sensitivities of the Hyper-K

HyperK detector