Analysis of Road Sediment Accumulation to Monumental Creek using the GRAIP Method

Similar documents
A GIS Tool to Analyze Forest Road Sediment Production and Stream Impacts

ABSTRACT. A Tool to Analyze Environmental Impacts of Roads on Forest Watersheds. Ajay Prasad, Master of Science. Utah State University, 2007

The Geomorphic Road Analysis and Inventory Package (GRAIP) Office Procedure Manual

Bear Valley Road Inventory (GRAIP) Report

Legacy Roads and Trails Monitoring Project

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Conservation Planning evaluate land management alternatives to reduce soil erosion to acceptable levels. Resource Inventories estimate current and

Workshops funded by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

Looking at the big picture to plan land treatments

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

Use of Thematic Mapper Satellite Imagery, Hemispherical Canopy Photography, and Digital Stream Lines to Predict Stream Shading

ROAD SEDIMENT ASSESSMENT & MODELING: KOOTENAI-FISHER TMDL PLANNING AREA ROAD GIS LAYERS & SUMMARY STATISTICS

Rates of gully erosion along Pikes Peak Highway, Colorado, USA

Monitoring Road Decommissioning in the Mann Creek Watershed Payette National Forest

Squaw Creek. General Information

Snowcover interaction with climate, topography & vegetation in mountain catchments

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

This Powerpoint presentation summarizes the use of NetMap for a Fire Decision Support System. Created on Sept 25, 2015 by Dr. Lee Benda and Kevin

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

How to Model Stream Temperature Using ArcMap

What is a watershed or landscape perspective?

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Improvement of the National Hydrography Dataset for US Forest Service Region 3 in Cooperation with the National Forest Service

A Simple Drainage Enforcement Procedure for Estimating Catchment Area Using DEM Data

Watershed Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GPS

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Chapter 6 Mapping and Online Tools

Legacy Roads and Trails Monitoring Project

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

Spatial Survey of Surface Soil Moisture in a Sub-alpine Watershed Colloquium Presentation, University of Denver, Department of Geography

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

13 Watershed Delineation & Modeling

PREDICTING BACKGROUND AND RISK-BASED SEDIMENTATION FOR FOREST WATERSHED TMDLS

Chapter 1 Overview of Maps

Digital Elevation Models. Using elevation data in raster format in a GIS

Each basin is surrounded & defined by a drainage divide (high point from which water flows away) Channel initiation

Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Lidar data in water resources applications. Paola Passalacqua CE 374K Lecture, April 5 th, 2012

Alaska, USA. Sam Robbins

Distinct landscape features with important biologic, hydrologic, geomorphic, and biogeochemical functions.

Geospatial Data, Services, and Products. National Surveying, mapping and geospatial conference

CUMO INSPECTION REPORT #6 Page 1

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

LOCATING DITCH RELIEF CULVERTS TO REDUCE SEDIMENT DELIVERY TO STREAMS - AN INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Measuring Stream Temperature with Digital Data Loggers

StreamStats: Delivering Streamflow Information to the Public. By Kernell Ries

Remote Sensing and GIS Applications for Hilly Watersheds SUBASHISA DUTTA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IIT GUWAHATI

Geog Lecture 19

ROAD SEDIMENT ASSESSMENT & MODELING

Great Lakes Online Watershed Interface W. Elliot, Research Engineer USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID March, 2016

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

MINISTRY OF FORESTS, LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS, POST-WILDFIRE RISK ANALYSIS PRELIMINARY REPORT

Illinois State Water Survey Division

USING 3D GIS TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL FLOOD HAZARDS IN MINA

Black Gore Creek Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Wall Creek Watershed GRAIP Roads Assessment North Fork John Day Subbasin Umatilla National Forest

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

MODULE 7 LECTURE NOTES 5 DRAINAGE PATTERN AND CATCHMENT AREA DELINEATION

GIS Techniques for Floodplain Delineation. Dean Djokic

Storm and Runoff Calculation Standard Review Snowmelt and Climate Change

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Surface Water and Stream Development

ABSTRACT The first chapter Chapter two Chapter three Chapter four

GPS-ASSISTED ROAD SURVEYS AND GIS-BASED ROAD EROSION MODELING USING THE WEPP MODEL

MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Effects of input DEM data spatial resolution on Upstream Flood modeling result A case study in Willamette river downtown Portland

Vulnerability of Flood Hazard in Selected Ayeyarwady Delta Region, Myanmar

GRAPEVINE LAKE MODELING & WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS

A GIS View of Hydrology

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

Observations on Surface Water in the Seminary Fen in Spring, Prepared 6/4/13 by Sam Wetterlin; updated 7/28/13

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

THE CASPAR CREEK EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED. Thomas Lisle, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Arcata, Califorina

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Recent findings related to measuring and modeling forest road erosion

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

Appendix I: The Summit-at-Snoqualmie Master Development Plan Proposal FEIS Physical and Biological Resource Data Tables

A combination of neural networks and hydrodynamic models for river flow prediction

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA

Transcription:

Analysis of Road Sediment Accumulation to Monumental Creek using the GRAIP Method Introduction (from http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/dtarb/graip/#over): The Geomorphologic Road Analysis and Inventory Package (GRAIP) is a process and set of tools for analyzing the impact of roads on forested watersheds. GRAIP uses information from USFS Global Positioning System (GPS) road surveys to analyze the impacts that the construction and use of forest roads can have on geomorphic processes and erosion patterns in forested basins. It is designed to help forest managers to effectively manage road and road drainage system and hence minimize the negative impacts of forest roads. GRAIP performs the following analyses to derive information on the environmental impact of roads on forested watersheds: Calculates and analyzes the production of road-based sediment and the input of that sediment into the stream network. Calculates the impact of road drainage on terrain stability and the potential for the formation of gullies due to erosion. Identifies fish passage passability at road-stream crossings and analyzes the resulting contiguity and fragmentation of the stream network fish habitat. Several tools were developed as part of GRAIP and are part of the download, includidng the GRAIP Preprocessor and the GRAIP ArcGIS Toolbar. In addition, GRAIP also requires the use of several other software packages that are not included in the GRAIP download. This includes ArcGIS 9.1/9.2, TauDEM, Hawth's Tools and SINMAP2.0. The Tarboton Group and the USDA Forest Service (USFS) developed the GRAIP (Geomorphologic Road Analysis and Inventory Package) process. Charles Luce and Thomas Black of the Forest Service developed much of the theory and the road inventory based approach which forms the foundation of GRAIP. Most of the work on the GRAIP tools was done by Ajay Prasad as his MS project under the supervision of David Tarboton with support from the USFS. The Forest Service's GRAIP page can be found here: http://www.fs.fed.us/graip/index.shtml. Overview (from http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/dtarb/graip/#over): The construction and use of forest roads can have a significant negative impact on geomorphic processes and erosion patterns in forested basins. To analyze this impact, the Tarboton Group and the USDA Forest Service (USFS) developed the GRAIP (Geomorphologic Road Analysis and Inventory Package) process. Charles Luce and Thomas Black of the Forest Service developed much of the theory and the road inventory based approach which forms the foundation of GRAIP. Most of the work on the GRAIP tools was done by Ajay Prasad as his MS project with significant revisions and updates by Kim Schreuders, both under the supervision of David Tarboton. GRAIP is designed to help forest managers effectively manage road and road drainage systems and hence minimize the negative impacts of forest roads. The GRAIP process begins by creating a detailed road inventory using GPS (Global Positioning System) based surveys. Then, a GRAIP analysis uses a number of GIS tools including the GRAIP tools along with a DEM (Digital Elevation Model) to derive environmental impact information from this inventory. The GRAIP analysis begins by using the GRAIP Preprocessor, a standalone application, to review the road inventory data for inconsistencies, document the inconsistencies, adjust and filter the data, and then builds the GRAIP database and the consolidated drain point and road shapefiles. This process ensures a minimum data quality and allows the data to be represented in a structured format that is more suitable for analysis.

The remainder of the analysis is performed using a number of tools including the GRAIP Toolbar, an ArcGIS 9.1/9.2 toolbar, that performs the heart of the analysis. In addition, a GRAIP analysis uses ArcGIS 9.1/9.2, TauDEM, Hawth's Tools and SINMAP2.0. The GRAIP Toolbar performs a number of analysis functions. The first group of functions calculates the sediment production for each road segment from slope, length, road surface condition and flow path vegetation. Road segment sediment production is then accumulated at each drain point. Digital elevation model (DEM) derived overland flow directions are then used to accumulate the sediment input to each stream segment. The second group of functions analyzes the impact of road drainage on terrain stability by calculating the specific discharge due to road drainage and using this, together with slope, as inputs to an infinite plane slope stability model. An erosion sensitivity index calculated using slope and contributing road length at each drain point is also calculated to predict gullying. The final function group analyzes the fragmentation of stream network fish habitat due to potential blockage of fish passage at stream crossings. Goal: Analyze road sediment accumulation to Monumental Creek using GRAIP protocols. The results would be in support of the Middle Fork Salmon TMDL. When: June 18-21, 2007 Weather Conditions: No recent rain, although spring runoff was concluding. Some snow was remaining in shady locations. Trees had yet to bloom, but shrubs and annuals were. Participants: Richard Lee (DEQ), Leslie Freeman (DEQ), Tom Black (USFS) Equipment: A GPS unit (GEO Trimble 3) was used which contained a data dictionary (Invent 3) that was obtained from the USFS. To aid in reception, a magnetic antennae was attached to the roof of the vehicle. Data Collection Methods and Locales: Data collection followed USFS protocols for GRAIP. Specifically, data was collected along all of the roads within the Monumental Creek watershed which could potentially contribute sediment directly/indirectly to the creek. Data collection began at Monumental Summit, and continued to and past a bridge across Monumental Creek, then up Coon Creek for as far as road-related runoff flowed toward the bridge (Figure 1). All road-derived sediment discharge points were collected by GPS and described in the data dictionary. All road segments (GPS lines) which lead to their respective discharge points were also GPS d and described in the data dictionary. Post processing: The GRAIP analysis was conducted following the guidelines contained within the tutorial produced by Utah State University. The analyzing process requires the use of ArcGIS 9.1/9.2, custom tools, and other packages which can be downloaded from the internet. The tutorial can be obtained from http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb/graip Results: According to GRAIP analysis, the total road-related sediment production within the Monumental Creek drainage is 1,109.1 metric tons/year (Figure 2). Almost all of the sediment production comes from two locales Coon Creek and the headwaters of Monumental Creek.

Coon Creek is an east-flowing second order perennial stream that enters Monumental Creek at the bridge (Figure 3). Coon Creek exists within a fairly steep sided drainage consisting chiefly of decomposing bedrock, and the road was constructed in the floodplain as well as into the south-facing hillside, which has little vegetation. In many locations, the road is bound by the hillside and a berm (Photo 1), resulting in tire tracks being the only mode by runoff. Coon Creek road building activities contribute approximately 660 metric tons/year of sediment to Monumental Creek over background levels (Figure 4). The primary source of sediment is via non-engineered drainage points (Figure 5). The other section of sediment producing road is near the headwaters of Monumental Creek (Figure 6). These areas contain steep slopes, the surface material consists of unsorted mass wasting deposits associated with snow-slide events, and the area has been recently burned (within a couple years). Additionally, a large number of streamlets, and therefore stream crossings, are present where road construction has cut across and through hillsides. In total, roads produce approximately 409 metric tons/year of sediment to Monumental Creek over background levels (Figure 7). The primary source of the sediment is via stream crossings and ditch relief culverts (Figure 8). With regards to background sediment production, available data indicates that a value of 13.1 Mg/km2/yr is reasonable (Kirchner, et al). An analysis of Monumental Creek indicates that some stream segments receive over 200% more sediment from road discharges (Figure 9).

Figure 1. View (looking east) of Study Area along Monumental Creek and Coon Creek

Figure 2. Total Sediment Accumulation by Monumental Creek, and Sediment Delivery Points within Monumental Creek Basin.

Figure 3. View (looking east) of roads within Coon Creek drainage that drain into Monumental Creek.

Photo 1. View looking east up the road adjacent to Coon Creek at a location approximately 500m from Monumental Creek. Notice the steep hillside on the left, and the berm on the right. The stream bed is on the right side of the berm. Water is running down tire tracks in the road.

Figure 4. Sediment Accumulation by Coon Creek and the Sediment Discharge Points into it.

Figure 5. Map illustrating that most sediment discharge into Coon Creek is via nonengineered runoff points.

Figure 6. View (looking southwest) of Upper Monumental Creek illustrating fire evidence (dark brown areas) and steep terrain.

Figure 7. Sediment Accumulation by the Headwaters of Monumental Creek and the Sediment Discharge Points into it.

Figure 8. Map illustrating that most sediment discharge into Coon Creek is via nonengineered runoff points.

Figure 9. Sediment Accumulation by Stream Segment as Compared to Background Levels of 13.1 Mg/km2/yr (Kirchner, et al.)

Bibliography Black, T. A., and C. H. Luce. 2002. A road inventory strategy for watershed analysis. USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID. Kirchner et.al., 2001. Mountain erosion over 10 yr, 10 k.y., and 10 m.y. time scales Luce, C. H., and T. A. Black. 2001b. Spatial and temporal patterns in erosion from forest roads. The Influence of Land Use on the Hydrologic-Geomorphic Responses of Watersheds. Water science and application 2: 165-178. Prasad, A., (2007), "A Tool to Analyze Environmental Impacts of Roads on Forest Watersheds," MS Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University. Tarboton, D. Hydrology Research Group, Utah State University. http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/dtarb/graip/#over