RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Similar documents
RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Serviceability Limit States

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

Project: Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7.

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Bending and Shear in Beams

Design of RC Retaining Walls

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

- Rectangular Beam Design -

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Clayey sand (SC)

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

R.C. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS, DETAILS & DETAILING

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

9.5 Compression Members

Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Entrance exam Master Course

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

RAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

DESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Module 14. Tension Members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Associate Professor. Tel:

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil


Module 6. Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Module 14. Tension Members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

Depending on the application and the anchor type one of the following two concepts can be applied: Partial safety factor concept.

Mechanics of Structure

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RETAINING WALLS

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Port and Marine Structures Made of Sheet Piling with Staggered Toe. 1. Introduction. 2. Design Approach and Main Dependencies

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

Topics. Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY NPTEL ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-I

Seismic design of bridges

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS

N = Shear stress / Shear strain

Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method

SHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

CO~RSEOUTL..INE. revisedjune 1981 by G. Frech. of..a.pqij~t(..~ttsa.fidteconol.q.gy. Sault ",Ste'...:M~ri,e.: SAUl. ir.ft\,nl~t';~l' G ". E b:.

Theory of Shear Strength

Assignment 1 - actions

Transactions on Information and Communications Technologies vol 20, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Transcription:

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with EN997:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values Retaining wall details Stem type; Propped cantilever Stem height; h stem = 5500 mm Prop height; h prop = 4000 mm Stem thickness; t stem = 500 mm Angle to rear face of stem; α = 90 deg Stem density; γ stem = 25 kn/m 3 Toe length; l toe = 2500 mm Heel length; l heel = 2500 mm Base thickness; t base = 500 mm Key position; p key = 550 mm Key depth; d key = 000 mm Key thickness; t key = 350 mm Base density; γ base = 25 kn/m 3 Height of retained soil; h ret = 5000 mm Angle of soil surface; β = 0 deg Depth of cover; d cover = 500 mm Depth of excavation; d exc = 200 mm Height of water; h water = 2500 mm Water density; γ w = 9.8 kn/m 3

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by 2500 500 2500 Surcharge Prop 88 kn/m 2 88 kn/m 2 550 350 5500 Retained soil properties Soil type; Soft clay Moist density; γ mr = 7 kn/m 3 Saturated density; γ sr = 7 kn/m 3 Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; φ' r.k = 2 deg Characteristic wall friction angle; δ r.k = 8 deg

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Base soil properties Soil type; Stiff clay Moist density; γ mb = 20 kn/m 3 Characteristic cohesion; c' b.k = 25 kn/m 2 Characteristic adhesion; a b.k = 20 kn/m 2 Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; Characteristic wall friction angle; Characteristic base friction angle; Loading details φ' b.k = 8 deg δ b.k = 2 deg δ bb.k = 4 deg Permanent surcharge load; Surcharge G = 2 kn/m 2 Variable surcharge load; Surcharge Q = 5 kn/m 2 Calculate retaining wall geometry Base length; Base height; Saturated soil height; Moist soil height; Length of surcharge load; l base = l toe + t stem + l heel = 5500 mm h base = t base + d key = 500 mm h sat = h water + d cover = 3000 mm h moist = h ret h water = 2500 mm l sur = l heel = 2500 mm Distance to vertical component; x sur_v = l base l heel / 2 = 4250 mm Effective height of wall; h eff = h base + d cover + h ret = 7000 mm Distance to horizontal component; x sur_h = h eff / 2 d key = 2500 mm Area of wall stem; A stem = h stem t stem = 2.75 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x stem = l toe + t stem / 2 = 2750 mm Area of wall base; A base = l base t base + d key t key = 3. m 2 App'd by Distance to vertical component; x base = (l base 2 t base / 2 + d key t key (p key + t key / 2)) / A base = 304 mm Area of saturated soil; A sat = h sat l heel = 7.5 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x sat_v = l base (h sat l heel 2 / 2) / A sat = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x sat_h = (h sat + h base) / 3 d key = 500 mm Area of water; A water = h sat l heel = 7.5 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x water_v = l base (h sat l heel 2 / 2) / A sat = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x water_h = (h sat + h base) / 3 d key = 500 mm Area of moist soil; A moist = h moist l heel = 6.25 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x moist_v = l base (h moist l heel 2 / 2) / A moist = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x moist_h = (h moist (t base + h sat + h moist / 3) / 2 + (h sat + h base) ((h sat + h base)/2 d key)) / (h sat + h base + h moist / 2) = 920 mm Area of base soil; A pass = d cover l toe =.25 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x pass_v = l base (d cover l toe (l base l toe / 2)) / A pass = 250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x pass_h = (d cover + h base) / 3 d key = 333 mm Area of excavated base soil; A exc = h pass l toe = 0.75 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x exc_v = l base (h pass l toe (l base l toe / 2)) / A exc = 250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x exc_h = (h pass + h base) / 3 d key = 400 mm

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Partial factors on actions Table A.3 Combination Permanent unfavourable action; γ G =.35 Permanent favourable action; γ Gf =.00 Variable unfavourable action; γ Q =.50 Variable favourable action; γ Qf = 0.00 Partial factors for soil parameters Table A.4 Combination Angle of shearing resistance; γ φ' =.00 Effective cohesion; γ c' =.00 Weight density; γ γ =.00 App'd by Retained soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; Design wall friction angle; φ' r.d = atan(tan(φ' r.k) / γ φ') = 2 deg δ r.d = atan(tan(δ r.k) / γ φ') = 8 deg Base soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; φ' b.d = atan(tan(φ' b.k) / γ φ') = 8 deg Design wall friction angle; δ b.d = atan(tan(δ b.k) / γ φ') = 2 deg Design base friction angle; δ bb.d = atan(tan(δ bb.k) / γ φ') = 4 deg Design effective cohesion; c' b.d = c' b.k / γ c' = 25 kn/m 2 Design adhesion; a b.d = a b.k / γ c' = 20 kn/m 2 Using Coulomb theory Active pressure coefficient; K A = sin(α + φ' r.d) 2 / (sin(α) 2 sin(α δ r.d) [ + [sin(φ' r.d + δ r.d) sin(φ' r.d β) / (sin(α δ r.d) sin(α + β))]] 2 ) = 0.60 Passive pressure coefficient; K P = sin(90 φ' b.d) 2 / (sin(90 + δ b.d) [ [sin(φ' b.d + δ b.d) sin(φ' b.d) / (sin(90 + δ b.d))]] 2 ) = 2.547 Bearing pressure check Vertical forces on wall Wall stem; F stem = γ G A stem γ stem = 92.8 kn/m Wall base; F base = γ G A base γ base = 04.6 kn/m Surcharge load; F sur_v = (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) l heel = 96.8 kn/m Saturated retained soil; F sat_v = γ G A sat (γ sr γ w) = 72.8 kn/m Water; F water_v = γ G A water γ w = 99.3 kn/m Moist retained soil; F moist_v = γ G A moist γ mr = 43.4 kn/m Base soil; F pass_v = γ G A pass γ mb = 33.8 kn/m Total; F total_v = F stem + F base + F sat_v + F moist_v + F pass_v + F water_v + F sur_v = 643.5 kn/m Horizontal forces on wall Surcharge load; F sur_h = K A cos(δ r.d) (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) h eff = 6.2 kn/m Saturated retained soil; F sat_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) (γ sr γ w) (h sat + h base) 2 / 2 = 58.5 kn/m Water; F water_h = γ G γ w (h water + d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 34. kn/m

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by Moist retained soil; F moist_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) γ mr ((h eff h sat h base) 2 / 2 + (h eff h sat Total; Moments on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; h base) (h sat + h base)) = 96.3 kn/m F total_h = F sat_h + F moist_h + F water_h + F sur_h = 550. kn/m M stem = F stem x stem = 255.2 knm/m M base = F base x base = 38. knm/m M sur = F sur_v x sur_v F sur_h x sur_h = 8.2 knm/m M sat = F sat_v x sat_v F sat_h x sat_h = 280.2 knm/m M water = F water_v x water_v F water_h x water_h = 355. knm/m M moist = F moist_v x moist_v F moist_h x moist_h = 232.6 knm/m M pass = F pass_v x pass_v = 42.2 knm/m Total; M total = M stem + M base + M sat + M moist + M pass + M water + M sur = 49.6 Check bearing pressure knm/m Maximum friction force; Maximum base soil resistance; F friction_max = F total_v tan(δ bb.d) = 60.4 kn/m F pass_h_max = γ Gf K P cos(δ b.d) γ mb (d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 99.6 kn/m Base soil resistance; F pass_h = min(max((m total + F total_h (h prop + t base) + F friction_max (h prop + t base) F total_v l base / 2) / (x pass_h h prop t base), 0 kn/m), F pass_h_max) = 0 kn/m Propping force; F prop_stem = min((f total_v l base / 2 M total) / (h prop + t base), F total_h) = 6.8 kn/m Friction force; F friction = F total_h F pass_h F prop_stem = 488.3 kn/m Moment from propping force; M prop = F prop_stem (h prop + t base) = 278. knm/m Distance to reaction; x = (M total + M prop) / F total_v = 2750 mm Eccentricity of reaction; e = x l base / 2 = 0 mm Loaded length of base; l load = l base = 5500 mm Bearing pressure at toe; q toe = F total_v / l base = 7 kn/m 2 Bearing pressure at heel; q heel = F total_v / l base = 7 kn/m 2 Effective overburden pressure; q = max((t base + d cover) γ mb (t base + d cover + h water) γ w, 0 kn/m 2 ) = 0 kn/m 2 Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q / γ γ = 0 kn/m 2 Bearing resistance factors; N q = Exp(π tan(φ' b.d)) (tan(45 deg + φ' b.d / 2)) 2 = 5.258 N c = (N q ) cot(φ' b.d) = 3.04 N γ = 2 (N q ) tan(φ' b.d) = 2.767 Foundation shape factors; s q = s γ = s c = Load inclination factors; H = F total_h F prop_stem F friction = 0 kn/m V = F total_v = 643.5 kn/m m = 2 i q = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] m =

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Net ultimate bearing capacity; App'd by i γ = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] (m + ) = i c = i q ( i q) / (N c tan(φ' b.d)) = n f = c' b.d N c s c i c + q' N q s q i q + 0.5 (γ mb γ w) l load N γ s γ i γ = 405. kn/m 2 Factor of safety; FoS bp = n f / max(q toe, q heel) = 3.463 Partial factors on actions Table A.3 Combination 2 Permanent unfavourable action; γ G =.00 Permanent favourable action; γ Gf =.00 Variable unfavourable action; γ Q =.30 Variable favourable action; γ Qf = 0.00 Partial factors for soil parameters Table A.4 Combination 2 Angle of shearing resistance; γ φ' =.25 Effective cohesion; γ c' =.25 Weight density; γ γ =.00 PASS Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure Retained soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; Design wall friction angle; φ' r.d = atan(tan(φ' r.k) / γ φ') = 9.7 deg δ r.d = atan(tan(δ r.k) / γ φ') = 6.4 deg Base soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; φ' b.d = atan(tan(φ' b.k) / γ φ') = 4.6 deg Design wall friction angle; δ b.d = atan(tan(δ b.k) / γ φ') = 9.7 deg Design base friction angle; δ bb.d = atan(tan(δ bb.k) / γ φ') =.3 deg Design effective cohesion; c' b.d = c' b.k / γ c' = 20 kn/m 2 Design adhesion; a b.d = a b.k / γ c' = 6 kn/m 2 Using Coulomb theory Active pressure coefficient; K A = sin(α + φ' r.d) 2 / (sin(α) 2 sin(α δ r.d) [ + [sin(φ' r.d + δ r.d) sin(φ' r.d β) / (sin(α δ r.d) sin(α + β))]] 2 ) = 0.66 Passive pressure coefficient; K P = sin(90 φ' b.d) 2 / (sin(90 + δ b.d) [ [sin(φ' b.d + δ b.d) sin(φ' b.d) / (sin(90 + δ b.d))]] 2 ) = 2.077 Bearing pressure check Vertical forces on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; F stem = γ G A stem γ stem = 68.8 kn/m F base = γ G A base γ base = 77.5 kn/m F sur_v = (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) l heel = 78.8 kn/m F sat_v = γ G A sat (γ sr γ w) = 53.9 kn/m F water_v = γ G A water γ w = 73.6 kn/m F moist_v = γ G A moist γ mr = 06.3 kn/m F pass_v = γ G A pass γ mb = 25 kn/m

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by Total; F total_v = F stem + F base + F sat_v + F moist_v + F pass_v + F water_v + F sur_v = 483.8 Horizontal forces on wall kn/m Surcharge load; F sur_h = K A cos(δ r.d) (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) h eff = Saturated retained soil; Water; 44.9 kn/m F sat_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) (γ sr γ w) (h sat + h base) 2 / 2 = 47.8 kn/m F water_h = γ G γ w (h water + d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 99.3 kn/m Moist retained soil; F moist_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) γ mr ((h eff h sat h base) 2 / 2 + (h eff h sat Total; Moments on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; h base) (h sat + h base)) = 60.6 kn/m F total_h = F sat_h + F moist_h + F water_h + F sur_h = 452.7 kn/m M stem = F stem x stem = 89. knm/m M base = F base x base = 235.7 knm/m M sur = F sur_v x sur_v F sur_h x sur_h = 27.6 knm/m M sat = F sat_v x sat_v F sat_h x sat_h = 205.3 knm/m M water = F water_v x water_v F water_h x water_h = 263 knm/m M moist = F moist_v x moist_v F moist_h x moist_h = 43.2 knm/m M pass = F pass_v x pass_v = 3.3 knm/m Total; M total = M stem + M base + M sat + M moist + M pass + M water + M sur = 039.8 Check bearing pressure Maximum friction force; Maximum base soil resistance; knm/m F friction_max = F total_v tan(δ bb.d) = 96.5 kn/m F pass_h_max = γ Gf K P cos(δ b.d) γ mb (d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 8.9 kn/m Base soil resistance; F pass_h = min(max((m total + F total_h (h prop + t base) + F friction_max (h prop + t base) F total_v l base / 2) / (x pass_h h prop t base), 0 kn/m), F pass_h_max) = 0 kn/m Propping force; F prop_stem = min((f total_v l base / 2 M total) / (h prop + t base), F total_h) = 64.6 Friction force; Moment from propping force; Distance to reaction; Eccentricity of reaction; kn/m F friction = F total_h F pass_h F prop_stem = 388. kn/m M prop = F prop_stem (h prop + t base) = 290.5 knm/m x = (M total + M prop) / F total_v = 2750 mm e = x l base / 2 = 0 mm Loaded length of base; l load = l base = 5500 mm Bearing pressure at toe; q toe = F total_v / l base = 88 kn/m 2 Bearing pressure at heel; q heel = F total_v / l base = 88 kn/m 2 Effective overburden pressure; q = max((t base + d cover) γ mb (t base + d cover + h water) γ w, 0 kn/m 2 ) = 0 kn/m 2 Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q / γ γ = 0 kn/m 2 Bearing resistance factors; N q = Exp(π tan(φ' b.d)) (tan(45 deg + φ' b.d / 2)) 2 = 3.784 N c = (N q ) cot(φ' b.d) = 0.7 N γ = 2 (N q ) tan(φ' b.d) =.447

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Foundation shape factors; s q = Load inclination factors; Net ultimate bearing capacity; s γ = s c = H = F total_h F prop_stem F friction = 0 kn/m V = F total_v = 483.8 kn/m m = 2 i q = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] m = App'd by i γ = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] (m + ) = i c = i q ( i q) / (N c tan(φ' b.d)) = n f = c' b.d N c s c i c + q' N q s q i q + 0.5 (γ mb γ w) l load N γ s γ i γ = 254.8 kn/m 2 Factor of safety; FoS bp = n f / max(q toe, q heel) = 2.897 PASS Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure RETAINING WALL DESIGN In accordance with EN992:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the recommended values Concrete details Table 3. Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete Concrete strength class; C40/50 Characteristic compressive cylinder strength; f ck = 40 N/mm 2 Characteristic compressive cube strength; f ck,cube = 50 N/mm 2 Mean value of compressive cylinder strength; f cm = f ck + 8 N/mm 2 = 48 N/mm 2 Mean value of axial tensile strength; f ctm = 0.3 N/mm 2 (f ck / N/mm 2 ) 2/3 = 3.5 N/mm 2 5% fractile of axial tensile strength; f ctk,0.05 = 0.7 f ctm = 2.5 N/mm 2 Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete; E cm = 22 kn/mm 2 (f cm / 0 N/mm 2 ) 0.3 = 35220 N/mm 2 Partial factor for concrete Table 2.N; γ C =.50 Compressive strength coefficient cl.3..6(); α cc =.00 Design compressive concrete strength exp.3.5; f cd = α cc f ck / γ C = 26.7 N/mm 2 Maximum aggregate size; Reinforcement details h agg = 20 mm Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement; f yk = 500 N/mm 2 Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement; E s = 20000 N/mm 2 Partial factor for reinforcing steel Table 2.N; γ S =.5 Design yield strength of reinforcement; f yd = f yk / γ S = 435 N/mm 2 Cover to reinforcement Front face of stem; Rear face of stem; Top face of base; Bottom face of base; Check stem design for maximum moment Depth of section; c sf = 40 mm c sr = 50 mm c bt = 50 mm c bb = 75 mm h = 500 mm

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; M = 04.8 knm/m d = h c sr φ sr / 2 = 442 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.03 K' = 0.96 App'd by K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min(0.5 + 0.5 ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 420 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A sr.req = M / (f yd z) = 574 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; 6 dia.bars @ 200 c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A sr.prov = π φ sr 2 / (4 s sr) = 005 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A sr.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 806 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A sr.max = 0.04 h = 20000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a sr.req, A sr.min) / A sr.prov = 0.802 PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 7.7 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A sr.prov z) = 69.8 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = 45000 mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A sr.prov / A c.eff = 0.007 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = 5.962 Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = 0.425 s r.max = k 3 c sr + k k 2 k 4 φ sr / ρ p.eff = 562 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.273 mm w k / w max = 0.909 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 95.7 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.673 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a sr.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002 v min = 0.035 N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = 0.479 N/mm 2

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; App'd by V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 2.7 kn/m V / V Rd.c = 0.924 PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force M = 72.6 knm/m d = h c sf φ sx φ sf / 2 = 442 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.009 K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min(0.5 + 0.5 ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 420 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A sf.req = M / (f yd z) = 398 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; 6 dia.bars @ 225 c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A sf.prov = π φ sf 2 / (4 s sf) = 894 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A sf.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 806 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A sf.max = 0.04 h = 20000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a sf.req, A sf.min) / A sf.prov = 0.902 PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 49.5 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A sf.prov z) = 3.8 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = 45000 mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A sf.prov / A c.eff = 0.006 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = 5.962 Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = 0.425 s r.max = k 3 c sf + k k 2 k 4 φ sf / ρ p.eff = 577 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.27 mm w k / w max = 0.725 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; V = 95.7 kn/m

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.673 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a sf.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; App'd by v min = 0.035 N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = 0.479 N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 2.7 kn/m V / V Rd.c = 0.924 Horizontal reinforcement parallel to face of stem 9.6 PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force Minimum area of reinforcement cl.9.6.3(); A sx.req = max(0.25 A sr.prov, 0.00 t stem) = 500 mm 2 /m Maximum spacing of reinforcement cl.9.6.3(2); Transverse reinforcement provided; s sx_max = 400 mm 0 dia.bars @ 200 c/c Area of transverse reinforcement provided; A sx.prov = π φ sx 2 / (4 s sx) = 393 mm 2 /m FAIL Area of reinforcement provided is less than area of reinforcement required Check base design Depth of section; h = 500 mm Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at toe; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; M = 270.7 knm/m d = h c bb φ bb / 2 = 45 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.039 K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min(0.5 + 0.5 ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 394 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 52 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A bb.req = M / (f yd z) = 579 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; 20 dia.bars @ 25 c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A bb.prov = π φ bb 2 / (4 s bb) = 253 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A bb.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 757 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A bb.max = 0.04 h = 20000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a bb.req, A bb.min) / A bb.prov = 0.628 PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 89.6 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A bb.prov z) = 9.4 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = 49375 mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A bb.prov / A c.eff = 0.07

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = 5.962 Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = 0.425 App'd by s r.max = k 3 c bb + k k 2 k 4 φ bb / ρ p.eff = 457 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.25 mm w k / w max = 0.833 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 26.6 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.694 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a bb.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.006 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at heel; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; v min = 0.035 N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = 0.488 N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 244. kn/m V / V Rd.c = 0.887 PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force M = 70.6 knm/m d = h c bt φ bt / 2 = 440 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.022 K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min(0.5 + 0.5 ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 48 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A bt.req = M / (f yd z) = 939 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; 20 dia.bars @ 75 c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A bt.prov = π φ bt 2 / (4 s bt) = 795 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A bt.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 803 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A bt.max = 0.04 h = 20000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a bt.req, A bt.min) / A bt.prov = 0.523 PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 56.3 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A bt.prov z) = 208.3 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 App'd by Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = 48333 mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A bt.prov / A c.eff = 0.02 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = 5.962 Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = 0.425 s r.max = k 3 c bt + k k 2 k 4 φ bt / ρ p.eff = 45 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.268 mm w k / w max = 0.895 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 73.8 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.674 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a bt.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.004 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; v min = 0.035 N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = 0.480 N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 224.2 kn/m V / V Rd.c = 0.775 Secondary transverse reinforcement to base 9.3 Minimum area of reinforcement cl.9.3..(2); A bx.req = 0.2 A bb.prov = 503 mm 2 /m Maximum spacing of reinforcement cl.9.3..(3); s bx_max = 450 mm Transverse reinforcement provided; PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force 2 dia.bars @ 200 c/c Area of transverse reinforcement provided; A bx.prov = π φ bx 2 / (4 s bx) = 565 mm 2 /m Check key design Depth of section; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at key; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required h = 350 mm M = 7.7 knm/m d = h c bb φ k / 2 = 269 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.006 K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min(0.5 + 0.5 ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 256 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 34 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A k.req = M / (f yd z) = 60 mm 2 /m

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Tension reinforcement provided; 2 dia.bars @ 200 c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A k.prov = π φ k 2 / (4 s k) = 565 mm 2 /m App'd by Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A k.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 49 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A k.max = 0.04 h = 4000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a k.req, A k.min) / A k.prov = 0.868 PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 0 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A k.prov z) = 0 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = 05458 mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A k.prov / A c.eff = 0.005 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = 5.962 Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = 0.425 s r.max = k 3 c bb + k k 2 k 4 φ k / ρ p.eff = 635 mm Maximum crack width exp.7.8; w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0 mm w k / w max = 0 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; V = 40 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.862 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a k.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002 v min = 0.035 N /2 /mm k 3/2 f 0.5 ck = 0.563 N/mm 2 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 5.3 kn/m V / V Rd.c = 0.264 PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force

Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by