EVALUATION OF SLOPE STABILITY NEAR LOTS #3-6, LOWER ICEHOUSE CANYON ROAD, MT. BALDY, CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Mass Wasting. Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition

Section 3. Slopes and Landscapes. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Mass Movements. Rock Weathering. Accumulation of Debris on Slopes. Landslides 12/8/2014

Mass Wasting Landslides, Mudflows. Chapter 7. Geology of the Hawaiian Islands. Any Questions? Mass wasting. Mass wasting.

Chapter 11 10/30/2013. Mass Wasting. Introduction. Factors That Influence Mass Wasting. Introduction. Factors That Influence Mass Wasting

Mass Wasting. Requirements for Mass Wasting. Slope Stability. Geol 104: mass wasting

Mass Wasting: The Work of Gravity

CHAPTER FIVE 5.0 STABILITY OF CUT SLOPES IN THE STUDY AREA. them limited by a thick canopy of vegetation and steep slope angles.

August 31, 2006 Embankment Failure Debris Flow at the Cascades Development Haywood County, North Carolina. Introduction. Findings

Preliminaries to Erosion: Weathering and Mass Wasting

=%REPORT RECONNAISSANCE OF CHISHOLM LAKE PROSPECT. October 25, 1977

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Base your answer to the following question on the map below, which shows the generalized bedrock of a part of western New York State.

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

Module/Unit: Landforms Grade Level: Fifth

Unsafe Ground: Landslides and Other Mass Movements

Weathering, Soil, and Mass Movements

Learning Objectives. Your goals for studying this chapter are: Understand where landslides occur. Understand the warning signs of landslides.

Pratice Surface Processes Test

Midterm Review. Nata/Lee

3/8/17. #20 - Landslides: Mitigation and Case Histories. Questions for Thought. Questions for Thought

Surface Processes on the Earth. Rocks, Weathering, Erosion and Soil

Sacramento Modesto Roseville Pleasanton September 19, 2013 Marcia Medina GHD Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA Subject: GE

3 Erosion and Deposition by Ice

The Importance of Mass Wasting

Beyond the Book. FOCUS Book

Name. 4. The diagram below shows a soil profile formed in an area of granite bedrock. Four different soil horizons, A, B, C, and D, are shown.

Ge Problem Set 1

Clyde River Landslide

Bell Ringer. Are soil and dirt the same material? In your explanation be sure to talk about plants.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Unit 7.2 W.E.D. & Topography Test

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition

Gateway Trail Project

The Effect of Weather, Erosion, and Deposition in Texas Ecoregions

Name: Which rock layers appear to be most resistant to weathering? A) A, C, and E B) B and D

The subject paper is being submitted for approval for publication in the annual volume entitled Geological Survey Research.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition, and Landscape Development

Prepared By: John Blair Sean Donahue Celeste Hoffman Kimberly Klinkers Megan Slater

Environmental Geology Lab 5 - Mass Wasting Hazards

Structural Geology Lab. The Objectives are to gain experience

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

Geog 1000 Lecture 17: Chapter 10

Erosional Features. What processes shaped this landscape?

3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

OIKOS > landslide > mechanism >predisposing causes

1. Any process that causes rock to crack or break into pieces is called physical weathering. Initial product = final product

EROSIONAL FEATURES. reflect

3.8 Geology/Soils. Environmental Setting. Topography. Geology and Soils

GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip

9/23/2013. Introduction CHAPTER 7 SLOPE PROCESSES, LANDSLIDES, AND SUBSIDENCE. Case History: La Conchita Landslide

STAAR Science Tutorial 40 TEK 8.9C: Topographic Maps & Erosional Landforms

1. Erosion by Running Water Most powerful cause of erosion

High-Gradient Streams

9/13/2011 CHAPTER 9 AND SUBSIDENCE. Case History: La Conchita Landslide. Introduction

abrasion the rubbing, grinding, and bumping of rocks that cause physical weathering (SRB, IG)

1. The diagram below shows the stump of a tree whose root grew into a small crack in bedrock and split the rock apart.


KRIS wsbssm. IBHiiilll

SLOPE PROCESSES, LANDSLIDES, AND SUBSIDENCE

Bradbury Mountain, Pownal, Maine

Mass Movements. This page last updated on 29-Oct-2015

Natural hazards in Glenorchy Summary Report May 2010

Excursion guide NW Skåne, NGEA 01, 2018 PART 3. ASSIGNMENTS

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Ch 10 Deposition Practice Questions

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

Name: Mid-Year Review #2 SAR

Page 1. Name:

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

Coarse Sediment Traps

CASE STUDY #9 - Brushy Fork Dam, Sugar Grove, West Virginia

Figure 1 The map shows the top view of a meandering stream as it enters a lake. At which points along the stream are erosion and deposition dominant?

Using Weather and Climate Information for Landslide Prevention and Mitigation

Using Map and Compass Together

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Essential Questions. What is erosion? What is mass wasting?

2. Initial Summary of Preliminary Expert Opinion of Converse and Psomas Reports


SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

1. The map below shows a meandering river. A A' is the location of a cross section. The arrows show the direction of the river flow.

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

Re: Steep Slope Assessment for 2465 Waverly Drive, Blind Bay, BC; Legal Address: Lot 39, Section 18, Township 22, Range 10, Plan 25579, W6M, KDYD.

Changes to Land 5.7B. landforms: features on the surface of Earth such as mountains, hills, dunes, oceans and rivers

Sherman Falls -Virtual Field Trip-

Glacial Geology of Moose Point State Park, ME

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

Notes and Summary pages:

Think about the landforms where you live. How do you think they have changed over time? How do you think they will change in the future?

Topic 6: Weathering, Erosion and Erosional-Deposition Systems (workbook p ) Workbook Chapter 4, 5 WEATHERING

Chapter 2: Landslides and Debris Flows

INTRODUCTION. Climate

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Black Point & Bihler Point

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF SLOPE STABILITY NEAR LOTS #3-6, LOWER ICEHOUSE CANYON ROAD, MT. BALDY, CALIFORNIA by Dr. Jonathan A. Nourse, Associate Professor Department of Geological Sciences California State Polytechnic University Pomona, California Submitted To: Paul Hannosh, Global Realty 201 Huntington Drive, Suite 200 Monrovia, California June 2, 2004

Introduction This report summarizes my May 30, 2004 field investigation of potential slope stability hazards that might affect four lots situated northeast of the intersection of Icehouse Canyon Road with Mt. Baldy Road. Lots #3-#6 are located precisely on a detailed topographic base map (Figure 1) surveyed and drafted by Jack Luepke and associates. My geologic map (Figure 2) and cross section (Figure 3) show a broader view of the landscape along with three-dimensional distribution of the soil and rock units. The main area of concern is a small portion of Icehouse Ridge (Photo 1) that abuts these properties on the north. Lots #3 and #5 include the lowermost slopes of Icehouse Ridge. This investigation assesses stability of the aforementioned properties with respect to two types of slope hazards: (1) Failure of the boulder talus slope contained in northern parts of Lots #3 and #5, and (2) Potential for rock fall; i.e., rolling or possibly airborne boulders derived from steep exposures of bedrock located much higher on Icehouse Ridge to the north. Possible solutions for mitigating these hazards are also discussed. Figure 1. Survey map showing locations of the four property lots described in the text. Icehouse Ridge forms the high ground directly north of Lots #3 and#5. Topographic contours are based on 300 stations surveyed by Jack Luepke and associates 1

Figure 2. Geologic map of the region surrounding the study area. Note location of cross section X-X (shown below in Figure 3). Figure 3. True-scale north-south geologic cross section through the study area. View is to the west, with Icehouse Ridge on the right. 2

Existing Geologic Conditions Bearing on Slope Stability The properties of interests are situated mainly on a gently east-sloping alluvial flood plain located 160 ft to 400 ft north of Icehouse Creek and approximately 40 ft higher than the active stream channel (Figures 2-3). The predominant soil type underlying the properties is unconsolidated sand and gravel alluvium, mapped as Qal on Figure 2. I have mapped several rounded stream boulders (Photo 2) on the enlarged lot map of Figure 4. The size of these boulders ranges from 50 cm to 2 m in diameter. They were probably deposited during prehistoric floods on Icehouse Creek. Flood waters did not reach the level of Icehouse Canyon Road during the two largest historical storm events recorded by local residents in 1969 and 1938. The stream boulders shown adjacent to Icehouse Canyon Road may be displaced from their original resting sites due to grading that accompanied construction of this road. Icehouse Ridge (Photo 1) forms a prominent topographic feature north of the properties. The crest of this northeast-trending ridge is underlain by a distinctive metamorphic rock mapped as my (short for mylonitic gneiss) on Figure 2. This bedrock unit is extensively fractured (Photo 3), with most of the fractures dipping moderately to steeply back into the slope. Unconsolidated deposits of talus breccia (shown as Qt on Figures 2-3) mantle the south-facing slope of Icehouse Ridge that lies directly north of the four lots. Breccia fragments range in size from coarse sand to boulders exceeding 50 cm diameter. Most of these angular pieces of loose rock are restricted to diameters between 8 cm and 25 cm. The northeast corner of Lot #5 and the northern third of Lot #3 overlap the lowermost part of this talus slope. The upper part of the slope (starting ~100 ft above the properties) is intermittently vegetated with grass and brush, plus several large fir and oak trees. Stability of the Talus Slope The unconsolidated talus slope directly north of Lots #3 and #5 currently rests in a metastable condition with respect to down-slope movement. In other words the existing slope has achieved a natural angle of repose in which a state of equilibrium exists between gravity-induced driving stresses and resisting stresses caused by friction between the breccia fragments. In more simple terms, frictional resistance should balance the tendency for down-slope movement even under conditions of maximum water-saturation. The talus slope directly north of the north boundary of Lot #3 rests at a natural angle of 32 o to 34 o (Figure 3; Photo 4). The portion of this slope higher than 200 ft above the property forms a slightly steeper angle of ~38 o. The 32 o angle should be regarded as the maximum angle that the lower slope can form and still be meta-stable. A narrow strip of boulder talus forming the base of the slope occupies the northern third of Lot #3 and the northeastern corner of Lot #5. This slope rests at an angle between 15 o and 21 o. The lower angle is probably due to long-term accumulation of small boulders that have rolled down from steeper slopes to the north. Conceivably, the slopes in the northern parts of Lots #3 and #5 could be cut back to a steeper angle, yielding a larger area of level ground. This scenario is discussed later, but the main constraints are: (1) the slope should not be cut at an angle steeper than 32 o, and (2) 3

construction of a substantial retaining wall would be necessary. Directly north of Lot #5 near the 4804 ft contour (Figure 4), one can directly observe the short-term effects of cutting back the talus slope. Here the base of the talus slope has been excavated by earth-moving equipment (presumably to acquire gravel for some unknown construction project?). The result is the oversteepened slope shown in Photos 5-6. Part of this cut is as steep as 47 o, exceeding the natural slope angle of 32 o to 34 o. One can see how recent rains are causing this slope to erode back to the northeast as it attempts to re-establish its natural angle of repose. The above discussion is limited to stability of the talus deposit with respect to rapid down-slope movement. Property owners should be aware that down-slope soil creep occurs under natural conditions. Creep is the very slow movement of the outer layers of a soil slope induced by freezing and thawing of water in the pores between the soil particles. Over the course of decades, talus slopes can be expected to creep downhill distances of 10 s of centimeters to >1 meter. Good examples of soil creep may be observed on the north side of Icehouse Canyon trail, where many trees are attempting to maintain vertical orientations as their lower trunks are disrupted by soil creep. Retaining walls provide traditional means of inhibiting this natural down-slope soil creep. Rock-Fall Hazard In the course of walking the four lots, I observed several boulders that very likely originated from distinctive bedrock exposures located on Icehouse Ridge to the north. These boulders (Photo 7), mapped as gneiss blocks on Figure 4, are easily distinguished from floodderived stream boulders on the basis of their jaggedness and a prominent mylonitic foliation (a texture resulting from metamorphism and shearing at a much earlier time when the bedrock was deeply buried). The same rock type occurs in outcrop directly north of the Lot #5-#3 boundary on the crest of Icehouse Ridge at ~5160 ft elevation (Photo 3). From these observations, I infer that the gneiss blocks broke loose from Icehouse Ridge and very rapidly reached their presentday locations. The gneiss blocks mapped on Figure 4 range in diameter from 50 cm to 1.5 m. Although these boulders appear to be restricted to Lot #3 and Lot #5, I noticed several blocks in Lot #4 that have been uncovered by recent excavation on that property. These were not mapped because their actual resting place could not be determined. However, one would expect more gneiss blocks to occur closer to the slope from which they originated. The time of these rock-fall events cannot be easily ascertained or even inferred. Many of the blocks appear to rest upon older flood-derived alluvium, but last time that Icehouse Creek flowed at the elevation of the four lots is not known. I suspect that most of the blocks came down before the Mt. Baldy area was settled. However, it might be prudent to query the older residents of the area to find out if anyone noticed evidence for rock-fall at the site during the past 60 years or so. Probable triggering mechanisms might include previous great earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault (located ~ 8 miles to the north) or disruptions of the upper slopes by heavy precipitation. 4

An important question to ponder is whether the gneiss blocks rolled to their present position after reaching the base of the slope, or whether they were airborne during their final movements. One can imagine a boulder tumbling down from Icehouse Ridge in leaps and bounds. Without direct historical observation, both scenarios should be considered as possibilities. This type of hazard is certainly not unique to the properties in question. Many other residents of the Mt. Baldy area are subject to rock-fall. In my opinion, it is simply a matter of deciding how much risk one is willing to take while living in the mountains. Figure 4. Detailed site map showing locations of fallen boulders and calculated slope angles 5

Conclusions and Recommendations Given the above stated constraints and analysis of limited data, I believe that the properties in question are reasonably safe with respect to rapid down-slope movement of the talus slope, provided that nothing is done to disturb its natural angle of repose of 32 o to 34 o. A certain degree of rock-fall hazard does exist, however, particularly for those areas of Lots #3 and #5 situated close to the base of the talus slope. I also recommend careful monitoring of the oversteepened cut slope north of Lot #5 near the 4804 ft contour. Without reinforcement, this cut will probably degrade back in future years, potentially affecting the presently stable slope to the east. Many years of natural weather conditions have graded the talus slope north of Lot #3 to a meta-stable angle of repose. Other than minor amounts of soil creep (discussed above), this slope is not expected to move substantially. Vegetation on the higher parts of the talus slope has enhanced the stability somewhat. Several large trees provide evidence that this part of the slope has not failed catastrophically in recent years. Opportunity may exist for cutting back the base of the talus slope in the northern portion of Lot #3, where the boulder talus deposits rest at an angle less than the natural angle of repose. Should this endeavor be undertaken, I recommend excavating the slope no steeper than 32 o, and installing a small (3-4-ft high) rock or concrete wall at the base of the slope to catch minor debris that sloughs off. Cutting back into the slope at an angle steeper than 32 o would be feasible, but this would require a much more sophisticated retaining wall. Design of such retaining walls is beyond the scope of this report. Assessment of the rock-fall hazard is uncertain because of the inherent infrequency and randomness of these events. The only thing one can say for sure is that at least 10 blocks ranging between 50 cm and 1.5 m diameter have come down onto the property sometime in the past (probably before the Mt. Baldy area was settled). How to mitigate this type of hazard depends on whether one believes the boulders rolled to their present positions or whether they arrived there from an airborne state. In terms of first order prevention, I recommend erecting a sturdy wall or fence on the north side of all structures intended for human occupation. This wall should theoretically be strong enough to impede a 1.5 m-diameter rolling boulder. As for the threat of airborne boulders, I believe that assessment of risk or security is simply a matter of serendipity that many mountain dwellers need to rationalize for themselves. Yes, there is a hazard, but will you or your structure be located precisely at the place the boulder falls, at the time that it falls? The most obvious preventive measures are: (1) Be prepared to evacuate quickly during any substantial earthquake, preferably as far as Icehouse Canyon Road, and (2) Keep a vigilant eye (and ear) directed toward Icehouse Ridge during and following heavy precipitation events. 6

Photo 1. View northeast towards Icehouse Ridge taken from Mt. Baldy Road below Icehouse bridge. The properties in question abut a talus slope along the southeast end of Icehouse Ridge. Photo 2. Large stream boulder probably deposited by a prehistoric flood on Icehouse Creek. Hammer is ~15 inches long. Rounded shape indicates transport by flowing water. 7

Photo 3. Fractured mylonitic gneiss exposed ~240 ft above Lot #3. Note hammer for scale. Photo 4. View to the west across talus breccia deposit forming slope north of Lot #3. The lower part of slope rests at ~21 o ; the upper part at ~32 o. Pink flag marks the NE corner of Lot #3. 8

Photo 5. Over-steepened cut into talus slope adjacent to the Mt. Baldy road just north of Lot #5. The talus slope in the background rests at angle of repose of ~32 o. Photo 6. Another view of the over-steepened slope 9

Photo 7. Boulder of mylonitic gneiss that occurs near the Lot #3-Lot#5 boundary. Hammer is ~15 inches long. Notice angular (jagged) nature of this rock, indicating transport by down-slope gravity mechanism 10