SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 now powered by HYPACK! CASE STUDY: USGS HYDROSURVEYOR SURVEY OF FENA VALLEY RESERVOIR, GUAM

Similar documents
Hydrographic Survey Program Texas Water Development Board. Nathan Leber Holly Holmquist Khan Iqbal Josh Duty Eli Pruitt

MLLW and the NAD83 Ellipsoid: An Investigation of Local Offsets and Trends Using PPK and Gauge Derived Water Surfaces.

CHAPTER 6 RESULTS FIGURE 8.- DATA WORK FLOW FOR BACKSCATTER PROCESSING IN HYPACK

H.A.R.S. PRA #1 (Historic Area Remediation Site)

Terje Pedersen Product Manager Software / Hydrography Hydroacoustics Division

Varying Bathymetric Data Collection Methods and their Impact on Impoundment Volume and Sediment Load Calculations I.A. Kiraly 1, T.

Bathymetry Data and Models: Best Practices

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

7.0 Project Reports 7.1 Geophysical Mapping of Submarine Environments

By Richard L. Kiesling. Open-File Report 2016-XXX

Using the Stock Hydrology Tools in ArcGIS

Side Scan Sonar Results for Additional Hardbottom Habitat Identification in Charleston Entrance Channel

Observed bed elevation changes in the data may arise as a result of any of several causes:

Multibeam Hydrographic Survey Use for Construction Control of Filling and Ground Improvement Activities

Digital Elevation Model of Tutuila, American Samoa: Procedures, Data Sources, and Analysis

Channel responses to the removal of Gold Ray and Savage Rapids Dam. Prepared by Desirée Tullos and Cara Water

Inspection of Waterfront Facilities Using Vessel-Based Remote Sensing Mitchell, Del Bello, Suarez

Contour Line Overlays in Google Earth

Changes in bottom morphology of Long Island Sound near Mount Misery Shoal as observed through Repeated Multibeam Surveys

Dynamics of Ripples on the Sandy Inner Shelf off Martha s Vineyard: Surveys, Field Measurements, and Models

GPS and Mean Sea Level in ESRI ArcPad

STATUS QUO REPORT ON ENC ACTIVITIES

Hydroacoustic survey and bathymetric map creation for Brant Lake, New York

Indonesia Frontier Basin SUNDA (SU-08) NON-EXCLUSIVE 2-D SURVEY 3084km

GIS-T 2010 Building a Successful Geospatial Data Sharing Framework: A Ohio DOT Success Story

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

Analysis of Physical Oceanographic Data from Bonne Bay, September 2002 September 2004

RESULTS OF THE 2007 MULTIBEAM BATHYMETRIC AND BACKSCATTER SURVEYS AT THE HISTORIC AREA REMEDIATION SITE

2) re-positioning of the SSS data, 3) individuation of geomorphological features and morphometrical parameters correlated to instability phenomena.

National Marine Sanctuary Program

WMS 10.1 Tutorial GSSHA Applications Precipitation Methods in GSSHA Learn how to use different precipitation sources in GSSHA models

Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Banner Creek Reservoir, Jackson County, Kansas

Performing Advanced Cartography with Esri Production Mapping

Student Activity Sheet- Denali Topo Map

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

BECQ 2017 SLR Map Layer Updates: Methodology for Coastal Flood Geoprocessing

Abstract. Introduction

Field and Numerical Study of the Columbia River Mouth

Your work from these three exercises will be due Thursday, March 2 at class time.

An Integrated Approach to Hydrographic Surveying of Large Reservoirs Application to Tarbela Reservoir in Pakistan

10/13/2011. Introduction. Introduction to GPS and GIS Workshop. Schedule. What We Will Cover

The Geodatabase Working with Spatial Analyst. Calculating Elevation and Slope Values for Forested Roads, Streams, and Stands.

Measuring earthquake-generated surface offsets from high-resolution digital topography

Practical applications of GPS surveying

Gold Ray Dam Removal Monitoring: OSU Summary. Prepared by Desiree Tullos and Cara Walter

Bathymetric Attributed Grids (BAGs): Discovery of Marine Datasets and Geospatial Metadata Visualization

Shape of the Earth. Data Output by the Receiver

Popular Mechanics, 1954

STATUS QUO REPORT ON ENC ACTIVITIES

Bathymetric Survey of Select Dissolved Oxygen Impaired Reservoirs

ArcGIS Data Models: Raster Data Models. Jason Willison, Simon Woo, Qian Liu (Team Raster, ESRI Software Products)

Web-Based 3D Geospatial Facility Model Data Interfaces

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of Sable Island Bank and adjacent areas

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible

Data Summary Report for the Monitoring Survey at the Providence River CAD Cell Site October Disposal Area Monitoring System DAMOS

caused displacement of ocean water resulting in a massive tsunami. II. Purpose

JALBTCX AND THE USACE NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM

Personal Field Data Collection by UM-FieldGIS (Integration of Google Map API to Mobile GIS)

GIS-based Smart Campus System using 3D Modeling

DATA 301 Introduction to Data Analytics Geographic Information Systems

Acoustic seafloor mapping systems. September 14, 2010

Downloading GPS Waypoints

River bed classification using multi-beam echo-sounder backscatter data

REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT: A GIS APPROACH TO SPATIAL DATA ANALYSIS. Lynn Copeland Hardegree, Jennifer M. Wozencraft 1, Rose Dopsovic 2 INTRODUCTION

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

GIS Functions and Integration. Tyler Pauley Associate Consultant

Catchment Delineation Workflow

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

Introduction-Overview. Why use a GIS? What can a GIS do? Spatial (coordinate) data model Relational (tabular) data model

USGS QUADRANGLES IN GOOGLE EARTH

SPOT DEM Product Description

NEW TOOLS TO IMPROVE DESKTOP SURVEYS

Parametric Sub Bottom Profiler measurements of the subaquatic portion of the debris fan of Gschliefgraben in Lake Traunsee, Austria

Bed-load measurements on large, sand-bed rivers in the United States

IMPLEMENTAION OF GIS TECHNOLOGY IN THE NILE AND ITS WADIS ABSTRACT

Spatial Data Analysis in Archaeology Anthropology 589b. Kriging Artifact Density Surfaces in ArcGIS

Exercise 6: Using Burn Severity Data to Model Erosion Risk

Geographic Information Systems. Introduction to Data and Data Sources

GSA DATA REPOSITORY

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS New England District BUILDING STRONG

GeoWEPP Tutorial Appendix

Lauren Jacob May 6, Tectonics of the Northern Menderes Massif: The Simav Detachment and its relationship to three granite plutons

Working with Digital Elevation Models and Spot Heights in ArcMap

Digital Elevation Models (DEM)

Among various open-source GIS programs, QGIS can be the best suitable option which can be used across partners for reasons outlined below.

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF RETENTION PONDS

Lecture Outline. Geography 12: Maps and Mapping. Review questions. Review questions. Large and Small Scale Maps. Large and Small Scale Maps

Butte County Fire Department

Lower 8.3 Miles of the Lower Passaic River Operable Unit 2 Presentation to The Passaic River Community Advisory Group. September 14, 2017

SonTek IQ - Principles of Operation

UNOLS Ocean Surveyor ADCP Overview

GIS Semester Project Working With Water Well Data in Irion County, Texas

Ultrasonic Measuring System for Deposition of Sediments in Reservoirs

Adaptive Bathymetric System Mapping of Champagne Reef and Scott s Head

Workshop: Build a Basic HEC-HMS Model from Scratch

Butte County Fire Department

Working with Digital Elevation Models and Digital Terrain Models in ArcMap 9

GIS Workshop UCLS_Fall Forum 2014 Sowmya Selvarajan, PhD TABLE OF CONTENTS

Working with Digital Elevation Models in ArcGIS 8.3

Recent developments in multi-beam echo-sounder processing at the Delft

Transcription:

SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 now powered by HYPACK! CASE STUDY: USGS HYDROSURVEYOR SURVEY OF FENA VALLEY RESERVOIR, GUAM

Presenters Harold Orlinsky General Manager HYPACK Isaac Jones Product manager, SonTek

Overview Background HydroSurveyor M9 Now fully integrated with HYPACK Max HYPACK Max software Case Study USGS - Fena Valley Reservoir Survey Survey to final product (HydroSurveyor software) HYPACK *.YDFF conversion HYPACK Survey to final product 3

Background: SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 9-beam ADCP 3 frequencies Collects 5-beam depth with 50deg swath in depths from 0.2-40m, up to 80m depth with vertical beam Simultaneously records depth and measures water velocity Sound speed correction using built in temperature sensor or integrated CastAway CTD 500 khz 3000 khz 1000 khz 50

Background: HYPACK Max software Fully integrated with SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 and CastAway CTD Powerful software that does it all Survey planning, data collection, post processing to final product Create contours, cross-sections, calculate volume, volume change and much more! Can combine bathymetry, topography and LiDAR Flexible exports (i.e., CAD, xyz, Google Earth *.kml, *.kmz) Hundreds of sensor interfaces and generic drivers HYPACK shell Survey view with 5-beam soundings

CastAway-CTD Integration 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 11:00 AM Sound Speed Profiles Time: 4 hours Space: 2 miles

USGS Survey of the Fena Valley Reservoir survey - Guam Primary source of fresh water for the US Naval base Guam and nearby residence Surveyed using two methods SonTek HydroSurveyor M9 and CastAway CTD Multi-frequencey, single beam subbottom profiler Objectives To determine: Current storage capacity Loss of storage capacity since 1951 Rate of storage capacity lost due to sedimentation Marineau 2014 7

Results: Fena Valley Reservoir Survey Total current (2014) storage capacity 6,915 acre-feet Survey prior to construction in 1951, storage capacity 8,365 acre-feet Decrease in storage capacity of 1,449 acre-feet (17%) and a decrease of live storage of 372 acre feet (6%) Average storage decrease of 23.0 acre-feet/year since construction Sedimentation rates cannot be estimated because of the uncertainty of previous surveys 48km of survey lines 2000m long reservoir 500m wide at its widest 8 Marineau 2014

Survey to final product (2014) HydroSurveyor SW: Navigate survey and collect data HydroSurveyor SW: Correct soundings with CastAway CTD data HydroSurveyor SW: Export sounding data to Excel ArcGIS: Remove bad soundings ArcGIS: Merge bed elevations and topographic survey Excel: Apply gauge height correction to soundings convert from depth to bed elevation ArcGIS: Import sounding data and interpolate using nearest-neighbor MATLAB: tabulate data and calculate surface area and cumulative storage capacity ArcGIS: Create contours for Map 9

Data flow Collection to final product HydroSurveyor M9 run by HYPACK SURVEY Single Beam Editor TIN Model Volumes HS data files *.YDFF HYPACK File converter (YDFF-RAW) In 2017, we will be releasing a 64-bit Single Beam editor (input: XYZ,EDT format) HYPLOT Contours 2D & 3D models CS&V KMZ and other 10

Data collection HYPACK Survey Setting up the hardware devices: 1. GPS Can use internal (SonTek PCM GPS) or external position device. For internal, ensure the connect is set for UDP output from the MP driver 2. Sontek M9 - needs to be installed on Mobile, for bottom track positioning 11

Data collection HYPACK Survey Setting up the Geodesy Choose the selected Grid (and zone) and elipsoid Working outside of a WGS84 elipsoid, you must include a data transformation 12

HYPACK Survey A typical layout for the Survey screen. Note the device driver has the three tabs, which can show: Depths from each transducer, velocity and bottom track 13

HYPACK Survey the M9 driver displays Depth Display Velocity Bottom Track 14

Data processing There are two work flows for getting the data processed: HYPACK Collected data (RAW) > Single Beam Editor (EDT and XYZ) > Final products (TIN model and Volumes) Previously collected data files (YDFF) > Data converter YDFF-RAW > Single Beam Editor > Final Products

Using YDFF data files collected from the HydroSurveyor software You will need to convert the YDFF to a HYPACK RAW file. The converter is included in the HSXConverter program. Launch from the Sidescan menu and select the file type YDFF 16

What exactly is in a RAW file All data is logged in seconds past midnight Each sensor has its own field (POS = position, HCP = motion, ECM = depth, GYR = gyro). Data from the M9 will hold all 9 depths, but on each ping, only 5 will be valid ECM 1 3168.000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.95 9.97 10.25 9.87 9.02 The center beam is in spot #5. In this example, the depth is 8.95. The others will be logged as slant range, and corrected with the take off angle. 17 POS 0 3168.000 251142.45 1477557.50 RAW 0 3168.000 4 1335.50916 14470.23846-15.194 5216.000 HCP 1 3168.000 0.00 0.13 0.80 GYR 1 3168.000 56.030 ECM 1 3168.000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.95 9.97 10.25 9.87 9.02 POS 0 3169.000 251142.02 1477557.28 RAW 0 3169.000 4 1335.50895 14470.23806-15.213 5217.000 HCP 1 3169.000 0.00 0.00 0.23 GYR 1 3169.000 55.950

Using Single Beam Editor Each RAW file contains the information from the GPS, motion sensor, depth and heading sensors. The associated YDFF holds the velocity data (a binary file) 18 Data selection option while running the Single Beam editor

Single Beam Editor Session 19

Cleaning out the data flyers Data flyers that need to be removed After editing 20

Data views in Single Beam Editor for QC the data Motion and heading data Trackline data Spreadsheet for exporting data 21

Data through TIN model TIN model (Triangular Irregular Network) will use the output from Single beam editor - XYZ or EDT files, to create contours, gridded soundings, 2D and 3D models, and volumes calculations 22

Data views in 2D The 2D display creates a filled surface of the data, and can output profile sections 23

Data views in 3D 3D model can be shown with vertical exaggeration, light illumination, and export as a GeoTiff image. 24

Computing volumes Reservoir Volumes or TIN to TIN (surface) volumes can be calculated 25 Level Volume Above Area Above Volume Below Area Below ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0.00 0.0 0.0 8450112.9 771698.5 1.00 2921.0 8607.3 7681335.4 763091.4 2.00 23678.0 33253.1 6930393.9 738445.4 3.00 71831.8 65053.5 6206849.2 706645.1 4.00 156595.0 105428.8 5519913.8 666269.7 5.00 283625.8 147686.1 4875246.1 624012.4 6.00 449642.6 183708.6 4269564.4 587989.9 7.00 650931.0 218467.7 3699154.3 553230.8 8.00 884834.3 249699.1 3161359.0 521999.4 9.00 1151650.3 284108.3 2656476.5 487590.3 10.00 1452523.8 317171.4 2185651.5 454527.1 11.00 1785965.7 351052.0 1747394.8 420646.5 12.00 2154860.9 387293.1 1344591.5 384405.5 13.00 2561929.7 428705.3 979961.8 342993.2 14.00 3015578.2 480310.4 661911.8 291388.1 15.00 3525760.5 538936.0 400395.6 232762.5 16.00 4100238.5 613514.0 203175.0 158184.5 17.00 4752364.0 690162.6 83602.0 81535.9 18.00 5470721.7 740026.0 30261.3 31672.5 19.00 6220239.9 757208.5 8080.9 14490.0 20.00 6984380.3 769568.3 522.7 2130.2 21.00 7755556.1 771698.5 0.0 0.0

Creating Contours and gridded soundings Countour (DXF) files can be created as a single level or filled area. Step size can be user defined. In this example, a 2 meter filled contour is created. 26

Creating gridded soundings As a plot overlay, gridded soundings can be exported from TIN model. In this example, soundings created ever 25 meters 27

Putting all the output together 28

Data exported to KMZ file (to Google Earth) Data Processes in TIN model, exported to a KMZ file from HYPACK, shown in Google Earth 29

Updated Single Beam Editor - (coming soon) All data can be viewed, color coded by line number, display of sounding data from all transducers. Will be easier to view all data at once Beta release October 1 30

New SB editor profile view 31

References Marineau, M.D., and Wright, S.A, 2015, Storage capacity of the Fena Valley Reservoir, Guam, Mariana Islands, 2014: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015 5128, 31 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155128 32

CHC 2016 Conference Comparing Survey Results Between a Multibeam Sonar and a Multi-Channel Depth-Capable ADCP PAT SANDERS, TECHNICAL DIRECTOR, HYPACK YSI HAROLD ORLINSKY, GENERAL MANAGER, HYPACK YSI

Coverage of the system With the beams at 25 degrees on each side, we can achieve a coverage of almost 1 times water depth Coverage = 2 x tan(25) x water depth In 10 meters of water, the system will give the user an effective swath of 9.6 meters. Compared to a traditional single beam system using a 3 degree transducer, and giving a footprint size of 0.5m, there is a tremendous advantage using this tool 34

Our Test Area: Providence, RI Surveyed on 1/22/2016 by USACE with R2Sonic 2024 multibeam and Applanix POS-MV Surveyed on 1/29/2016 by USACE with a SONTEK M9 ADCP and Applanix POS- MV 35

Survey Hardware: Multibeam Configuration M9 Configuration R2Sonic 2024 Applanix POS-MV SONTEK M9 Applanix POS-MV Network Switch RS-232 Network Switch HYPACK/HYSWEEP SURVEY HYPACK SURVEY Bluetooth SONTEK Castaway Bluetooth SONTEK Castaway 36

PROCESSING R2Sonic Multibeam Data LNW File HSX Files MBMAX XYZ File TIN MODEL DXF Contours Sections CSV SONTEK M9 Data (SBMAX) LNW File RAW Files SBMAX Edited Files TIN MODEL DXF Contours Sections 37

M9 Data in SBMAX 38

Contour Comparisons DREDGE AREAS Multibeam Contours in Blue M9 - SBMAX Contours in BLACK Contoured every 5 in HYPACK s TIN MODEL Good agreement on slopes Noise in M9 data set generates multiple contour artifacts (unsmoothed data) 39

Comparison of Sections Through TIN MODELS Multibeam M9 from MBMAX M9 from SBMAX 40

Why it s good to have complete coverage Multibeam M9 from MBMAX M9 from SBMAX 41

Statistical Comparisons and observations XYZ MB SBMAX M9 TIN MODEL XYZ Differences Multibeam data verse HydroSurveyor M9: Mean difference: 11 cm Standard Deviation: 26cm The depths from the SONTEK M9 Hydrosurveyor can meet IHO Order 1A/B survey standards when combined with a quality positioning system. It s not going to replace your multibeam system, but for hydrographers interested in obtaining simultaneous current and depth measurements, it can reduce redundant systems 42

Thank you Questions? 43

References Marineau, M.D., and Wright, S.A, 2015, Storage capacity of the Fena Valley Reservoir, Guam, Mariana Islands, 2014: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015 5128, 31 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155128 44