INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Similar documents
Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Supplementary Problems for Chapter 7

OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Theory of Shear Strength

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Development of Bearing Capacity Theory. Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory

water proofing will relatively long time fully completed) be provided 10 storey building (15x25m) original GWT position 1 sat = 20 kn/m 3

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Analysis of a single pile settlement

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

Theory of Shear Strength

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Chapter 4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. Omitted parts: Sections 4.7, 4.8, 4.13 Examples 4.8, 4.9, 4.

SHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University

Clayey sand (SC)

HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS

Foundations with D f equal to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION

Axially Loaded Piles

Principal Symbols. f. Skin friction G Shear modulus. Cu Coefficient of uniformity Cc Coefficient of curvature

SEM-2016(01HI CIVIL ENGINEERING. Paper Answer all questions. Question No. 1 does not have internal choice,

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION 1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION

Lateral Earth Pressure

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr. N. K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Monitoring of underground construction

Topics. Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY NPTEL ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-I

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

Landslide FE Stability Analysis

Examples to verify and illustrate ELPLA

Analysis of pile foundation Simplified methods to analyse the pile foundation under lateral and vertical loads

23.1 Effective Stress 23.2 Settlement of Foundations Time-Dependent Settlement Magnitude of Acceptable Settlement

Computers and Geotechnics

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

Geotechnical Properties of Soil

Numerical modelling of tension piles

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Project: Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7.

Liquefaction and Foundations

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

CE : CIVIL ENGINEERING

EARTH PRESSURES ON RETAINING STRUCTURES

CHAPTER 12 SHALLOW FOUNDATION I: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 12.1 INTRODUCTION

Foundations of High Rise Buildings

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

Foundation Engineering

Verification Manual GT

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

Associate Professor. Tel:

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

Design of RC Retaining Walls

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Finite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil focussing on Negative Skin Friction

The theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will

Effect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities


SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Calculation types: drained, undrained and fully coupled material behavior. Dr Francesca Ceccato

TIME-DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR OF PILE UNDER LATERAL LOAD USING THE BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

SOIL MECHANICS: palgrave. Principles and Practice. Graham Barnes. macmiiian THIRD EDITION

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY

Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis

SOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

Piles and Pile Foundations

FUNDAMENTALS SOIL MECHANICS. Isao Ishibashi Hemanta Hazarika. >C\ CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad. Chapter (7)

Transcription:

EGC373 (F) / Page 1 of 5 INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA UK DEGREE TRANSFER PROGRAMME INTI ADELAIDE TRANSFER PROGRAMME EGC 373: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FINAL EXAMINATION : AUGUST 00 SESSION This paper consists of FIVE (5) questions. Answer FOUR (4) questions in the answer booklet provided. All questions carry equal marks. 1. (a) A wall footing is to be constructed on a uniform dense sand deposit as shown in Figure Q1(a). The footing is to support a wall that imposed vertical load 400 kn/m and a eccentric moment of 30 kn-m/m of wall length. The depth of footing is 1. m below ground surface. Determine the required width of footing using Meyerhof s Bearing Capacity equation with a safety factor of 3.0. (1 marks) An eccentrically loaded shallow foundation measuring 3 m x 3 m is shown in Figure Q1. The sand deposit has the following soil properties: friction angle φ = 30, cohesion c= 4 kn/m, total unit weight γ t = 18.1 kn/m 3, and saturated unit weight γ sat =19. kn/m 3.Use a factor of safety of 3, determine the maximum allowable load that the foundation can carry. (13 marks) Figure Q1(a) Figure Q1

EGC373 (F) / Page of 5. (a) A concrete pile 0 m long has a cross section of 381 mm x 381 mm. The pile is embedded in sand having unit weight γ = 18.9 kn/m 3 and frictional friction φ = 38. The allowable working load is 760 kn. If 450 kn are contributed by the skin friction resistance and 310 kn are from point load, determine the elastic settlement of the pile. The elastic modulus of the pile E p is 1 x 10 6 kn/m. The sand has the following soil properties: elastic modulus E s = 35 x 10 3 kn/m, poisson ratio µ s = 0.35 and skin friction distribution factor ξ along the pile shaft = 0.6, and influence factor I wp =0.85. Given I ws = +0.35 L. D b) A concrete pile of 500 mm diameter is driven through a 6-m depth clay fill placed over the dense sand deposit to a further 10 m depth. The clay fill is recently placed and will settle under load. The pile is a low displacement pile with earth pressure coefficient k=1-sin φ; and has a soil-pile friction angle δ = 0.70φ. Refer to the Figure Q for details. (i) (ii) Determine the allowable pile capacity, assuming this is a pure friction pile with a factor of safety of 4.0. (10 marks) Determine the allowable pile capacity, assuming this pile has both the end bearing and friction capacity with a factor of safety of 4.0 using the Coyle & Castello s method of determining the end bearing capacity in sand. (7 marks) Figure Q

EGC373 (F) / Page 3 of 5 3. (a) In an industrial building, two columns are placed close to each other and will be supported on a common rectangular foundation. The foundation soil is clay with the following soil properties: friction angle φ u = 0, undrained cohesion c u =90 kn/m and total unit weight γ t = 18.85 kn/m 3. Given that the estimated weight of foundation is 30.64 kn/m. Using Meyerhof Bearing Capacity equation with a factor of safety of 3.0, determine the footing dimensions. Refer to Figure Q3(a). (16 marks) A mat foundation has a dimension of 1 m x 18 m. The combined dead and live load from the structure is 44.5MN. The saturated clay has the following soil properties: c u =50 kn/m, φ u = 0, γ t =17.6 kn/m 3. Determine the depth of mat for a factor of safety of 3.0 against bearing capacity failure. Refer to Figure Q3. Figure Q3(a) Figure Q3

EGC373 (F) / Page 4 of 5 4. (a) A cut is made for a service road creating a finite slope shown in Figure Q4(a). For the soil in the slope, the following values are given: c = 18 kn/m, φ =0 and density ρ= 1700 kg/m 3. Assume the critical surface for sliding to be a plane (Culmann s assumption), determine the maximum safe height of the slope using a factor of safety of.0 against sliding. (c) A cut is made for a railway construction by the Malaysian Railway authority as shown in Figure Q4. Determine the factor of safety according to the Bishop and Morgenstern s method. (1 marks) List a few stabilizing methods that can be used to improve the stability of slopes that are susceptible to landsliding. (4 marks) Figure Q4(a) Figure Q4

EGC373 (F) / Page 5 of 5 5. A surcharge and sand drain installation is proposed for an airport project to accelerate the consolidation settlement of a 9m thick clay layer underlying the construction area. In this project, 0.50m-diameter sand drains are installed to accelerate consolidation settlement of this clay layer deposit. The diameter of effective zone of drainage (d e ) is found to be 4.5 m and the coefficient of consolidation for radial drainage (c vr ) and vertical drainage (c v ) is 0.8 m per month. The ratio of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the unsmeared to smeared zone (k h /k s ) is.5. The radial distance (r s ) from center of sand drain to the farthest point of smear zone is 0.4 m. Assume surcharge is applied instantaneously. (a) Determine the degree of consolidation of the clay layer caused only by the sand drains after six month of surcharge application. (c) Determine the degree of consolidation of the clay layer that is caused by the combination of vertical drainage (drained on both top and bottom) and radial drainage after six month of surcharge application. Determine the temporary surcharge that will be required to eliminate the entire primary consolidation settlement in 4 months by pre-compression technique. Assume that the average effective overburden pressure at the middle of clay layer is 1000 kn/m and the increase in the pressure due the average permanent load on the clay layer is 100 kn/m. 8Tr (- ) m C vt T = d ; e Ur = 1- e ; v t de n = ; r w T v π U = v 4 100 n n 3 s kh n s = ln + + ( ) ln s ; U v =1-(1-U r )(1-U v ) n s s 4 4n ks n m Appendix 1 Appendix Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Table of Bearing Capacity Factors and other related factors Variation of N q with Friction Angle φ per Coyle & Castello s Method Morgenstern and Bishop s charts for slope stability analysis Plot of mid-plane degree of consolidation against T v Plot of P f / P p against U% for various values of P p / P o -THE ENDegc373apr`0/final/lee