Appendix to Notes 8 (a)

Similar documents
FUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. III.1. Measurable functions. f 1 (

7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

Lecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 19: Riemann sums. Properties of integrals.

Presentation Problems 5

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 9

Math 554 Integration

Review of Riemann Integral

Math 324 Course Notes: Brief description

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

a n = 1 58 a n+1 1 = 57a n + 1 a n = 56(a n 1) 57 so 0 a n+1 1, and the required result is true, by induction.

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE. Contents 1. Uniform Convergence 1 2. Properties of uniform convergence 3

Lecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.

MAA 4212 Improper Integrals

1 i n x i x i 1. Note that kqk kp k. In addition, if P and Q are partition of [a, b], P Q is finer than both P and Q.

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 18: Darboux sums. The Riemann integral.

Chapter 4. Lebesgue Integration

Calculus in R. Chapter Di erentiation

MAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL

ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO

Entrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2009 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems. Compute the following and justify your computation: lim

Week 7 Riemann Stieltjes Integration: Lectures 19-21

The Henstock-Kurzweil integral

Principles of Real Analysis I Fall VI. Riemann Integration

Chapter 22. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Properties of the Riemann Integral

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

For a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral

A PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS USING HAUSDORFF MEASURES

2 Definitions and Basic Properties of Extended Riemann Stieltjes Integrals

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

A product convergence theorem for Henstock Kurzweil integrals

MATH1050 Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and Triangle Inequality

STUDY GUIDE FOR BASIC EXAM

SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set

38 Riemann sums and existence of the definite integral.

Chapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?

The Banach algebra of functions of bounded variation and the pointwise Helly selection theorem

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 7 Mar 2012

T b a(f) [f ] +. P b a(f) = Conclude that if f is in AC then it is the difference of two monotone absolutely continuous functions.

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU. Simona Fišnarová (Mendel University) Definite integral MENDELU 1 / 30

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

Chapter 6. Infinite series

DEFINITE INTEGRALS. f(x)dx exists. Note that, together with the definition of definite integrals, definitions (2) and (3) define b

Homework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.

Properties of Integrals, Indefinite Integrals. Goals: Definition of the Definite Integral Integral Calculations using Antiderivatives

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

a n+2 a n+1 M n a 2 a 1. (2)

NOTES AND PROBLEMS: INTEGRATION THEORY

Introduction to Real Analysis (Math 315) Martin Bohner

Lecture 3. Limits of Functions and Continuity

1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove

7 Improper Integrals, Exp, Log, Arcsin, and the Integral Test for Series

Review of Calculus, cont d

Lecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation

Main topics for the First Midterm

Chapter 6. Riemann Integral

This is a short summary of Lebesgue integration theory, which will be used in the course.

INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATION

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011

7.2 The Definition of the Riemann Integral. Outline

Math 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions

Math 118: Honours Calculus II Winter, 2005 List of Theorems. L(P, f) U(Q, f). f exists for each ǫ > 0 there exists a partition P of [a, b] such that

Advanced Calculus I (Math 4209) Martin Bohner

Prof. Girardi, Math 703, Fall 2012 Homework Solutions: 1 8. Homework 1. in R, prove that. c k. sup. k n. sup. c k R = inf

Math 8 Winter 2015 Applications of Integration

11 An introduction to Riemann Integration

A HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction

Mapping the delta function and other Radon measures

Question 1. Question 3. Question 4. Graduate Analysis I Chapter 5

The Riemann Integral

Integration Techniques

IMPORTANT THEOREMS CHEAT SHEET

Sections 5.2: The Definite Integral

Riemann Stieltjes Integration - Definition and Existence of Integral

Euler, Ioachimescu and the trapezium rule. G.J.O. Jameson (Math. Gazette 96 (2012), )

Math 1B, lecture 4: Error bounds for numerical methods

Week 10: Riemann integral and its properties

MORE FUNCTION GRAPHING; OPTIMIZATION. (Last edited October 28, 2013 at 11:09pm.)

1 Sets Functions and Relations Mathematical Induction Equivalence of Sets and Countability The Real Numbers...

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integration

Generalized Riemann Integral

Analytical Methods Exam: Preparatory Exercises

LECTURE. INTEGRATION AND ANTIDERIVATIVE.

Math 1431 Section M TH 4:00 PM 6:00 PM Susan Wheeler Office Hours: Wed 6:00 7:00 PM Online ***NOTE LABS ARE MON AND WED

Math 301 Integration I

STURM-LIOUVILLE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

f(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral

A4 Integration (2017 HT)

Problem Set 4: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ho] 16 Dec 2003

Transcription:

Appendix to Notes 8 () 13 Comprison of the Riemnn nd Lebesgue integrls. Recll Let f : [, b] R be bounded. Let D be prtition of [, b] such tht Let D = { = x 0 < x 1 <... < x n = b}. m i = inf{f(x) : x i 1 x x i } M i = sup{f(x) : x i 1 x x i }. Define the step functions (therefore, simple functions, since we hve ssumed tht f is bounded nd so M i < for ll i). nd So α D (x) = m i on [x i 1, x i ) for ll 1 i n, β D (x) = M i on [x i 1, x i ) for ll 1 i n. α D (x) f(x) β D (x) for ll x [, b]. Note tht if D D then α D (x) α D (x) nd β D (x) β D (x). Tht is, with finer prtition we get better pproximtions to f. With the nottion of integrls of simple functions we hve, with Lebesgue mesure on R, I(α D ) = n m i (x i x i 1 ) nd I(β D ) = i=1 n M i (x i x i 1 ), i=1 which re normlly known s L(D, f) nd U(D, f) in the theory of Riemnn integrtion. Then we obviously hve I(α D ) I(β D ) for ll D, nd if D D then I(α D ) I(α D ) nd I(β D ) I(β D ). Let f(x)dx = sup D I(α D ) nd Then f is Riemnn integrble if, nd only if, f(x)dx = inf D I(β D). 1

The common vlue is denoted by f(x)dx = R- f(x)dx. f(x)dx. Theorem 1 If f is Riemnn integrble on finite intervl [, b] then it is Lebesgue integrble with the sme vlue. Proof For ech n 1 we cn find, by the definition of supremum, prtition D α n such tht when, in prticulr, 0 f(x)dx I(α D α n ) < 1 n, I(α D α n ) f(x)dx s n. Similrly choose sequence of prtitions D β n such tht I(β D β n ) Set D n = Dn α Dn β then f(x)dx s n. nd Thus I(α D α n ) I(α Dn ) I(β D β n ) I(β Dn ) f(x)dx f(x)dx. I(α Dn ) f(x)dx nd I(β Dn ) f(x)dx s n. (1) 2

Replcing the sequence D 1, D 2, D 3,... by D 1, D 1 D 2, D 1 D 2 D 3,...nd relbeling we cn ssume tht D n D n+1 for ll n 1 while (1) still holds. Yet D n D n+1 mens tht α Dn (x) α Dn+1 (x) nd β Dn (x) β Dn+1 (x) for ll n nd x. In prticulr {α Dn } n 1 in n incresing sequence bounded bove by f. So lim n α Dn = g exists, nd stisfies g f. Similrly {β Dn } n 1 in n decresing sequence bounded below by f. So lim n β Dn = h exists, nd stisfies h f. Now {α Dn α D1 } n 1 is n incresing sequence of non-negtive simple F-mesurble functions tending to g α D1. So by Lebesgue s Monotone Convergence Theorem we hve L- (g α D1 )dµ = lim I(α Dn α D1 ) = lim I(α Dn ) I(α D1 ) = f(x)dx I(α D1 ). Since α D1 is simple function we hve L- α D 1 dµ = I(α D1 ) nd so L- gdµ = Similrly, by exmining β D1 β Dn L- hdµ = f(x)dx. (2) we find tht f(x)dx. So, if f is Riemnn integrble, tht is, f(x)dx = f(x)dx, then L (g h)dµ = 0. Yet h g 0, so h = g.e.(µ) on [, b]. But g f h nd so f = g.e.(µ) on [, b]. Hence L- fdµ = L- = = R- gdµ since f = g.e.(µ) on [, b] f(x)dx by (2) f(x)dx 3 since f is Riemnn integrble

Let (D) = mx 1 i n (x i x i 1 ). In Theorem 1 it is possible, by dding extr points to ech of the prtitions D n, to ssume tht (D n ) 0 s n. With the nottion nd ssumptions of Theorem 1 we cn prove Lemm 1 Assume tht (D n ) 0 s n. Then for ny x / k=1 D k we hve tht f is continuous t x if, nd only if, g(x) = f(x) = h(x). Proof Recll tht f is continuous t x if, nd only if, ε > 0 δ > 0 : y if y x < δ then f(y) f(x) < ε. (3) For ech k let I k be the subintervl of D k contining x. This is unique since x / k=1 D k. Write I k = [x i 1, x i ]. ( ) Let ε > 0 be given. From (D6) we find δ > 0. Since (D n ) 0 s n there exists N such (D n ) < δ for ll n N. Then l(i k ) < δ so if y I k we hve tht y x < δ. In which cse, from (D6) we get tht f(y) f(x) < ε. In turn this mens tht we hve both inf f(y) f(x) < ε nd sup f(y) f(x) < ε. I k Yet inf Ik f(y) nd sup Ik f(y) re the vlues of α k nd β k t x. Hence, combining the inequlities, β k (x) α k (x) < 2ε. Let k to deduce h(x) g(x) < 2ε. True for ll ε > 0 gives h(x) = g(x). ( ) Assume f is not continuous t x. So ε > 0 δ > 0 : y with y x < δ nd f(y) f(x) ε. (4) For ech k 1 choose δ k = min(x x i 1, x i x) so (x δ k, x + δ k ) I k. But then by (4) we cn find y k (x δ k, x+δ k ) such tht f(y k ) f(x) ε. In prticulr, I k sup f inf f ε, I k I k in which cse β k (x) α k (x) ε nd h(x) g(x) ε. Hence h(x) g(x). This leds to Theorem 2 Assume f : [, b] R is bounded. Then f is Riemnn integrble if, nd only if, f is continuous.e.(µ) on [, b]. Proof Choose sequence of prtitions, D k, s in Lemm 1. Then. 4

f is continuous.e.(µ) on [, b] iff f is continuous.e.(µ) outside D k on [, b] k iff g = h.e.(µ) on [, b] by Lemm 1, iff gdµ = hdµ iff iff f(x)dx = f(x)dx f is Riemnn integrble. Mesure preserving Trnsformtions These re specil cse of mesurble functions. Definition T : (, F, µ) (, F, µ) is mesure preserving trnsformtion if (i) T 1 A F for ll A F, (ii) µ(t 1 A) = µ(a) for ll A F. Definition Let A F. A point x A is sid to be recurrent with respect to A if there exists k 1 such tht T k x A. Theorem 3 Poincre s Recurrence Theorem Assume tht µ() <. Let F be the set of points of A which re not recurrent with respect to A. Then µ(f ) = 0. (So for every A F, lmost ll points of A re recurrent.) Proof Let x F. If there exists n 1 such tht T n x F then we hve both x F A nd T n x F A, i.e. x is recurrent point with respect to A, which contrdicts the definition of F. So T n x / F for ll n 1, tht is, T n F F = for ll n 1. Now, the preimge of n empty set is empty, so given ny k, n 1 we hve = T k n (T n F F ) = T k F T (n+k) F. Hence the sets F, T 1 F, T 2 F,... re pirwise disjoint. So 5

( ) > µ() µ T k F = = µ(t k F ) k=0 µ(f ) k=0 k 0 by prt (ii) of definition. Hence µ(f ) = 0. We cn sk how long it tkes point x A to wnder bck into A. To this end define n A (x) = min{n 1 : T n x A}. Assume throughout the rest of this section tht µ() = 1. Definition A mesure preserving mp T : is Ergodic if either of the following hold. (i) Whenever A F is such tht µ(t 1 A A) = 0 then either µ(a) = 0 or 1. (ii) Whenever n integrble function f stisfies f(t x) = f(x) for.e. (µ) x in then f is constnt.e.(µ) on. The first definition here mens tht if T 1 A is lmost exctly A then either µ(a) = 0 or 1. So if 0 < µ(a) < 1 then T 1 A must differ quite lot from A. We sy tht T is mixing up the spce. We do not prove here tht (i) nd (ii) re equivlent. It cn be shown tht if T is ergodic then n A dµ = 1. A Since A dµ = µ(a) we hve, tht in some sense, n A is of size 1/µ(A). This is connected with the question of how often point x will wnder into the set A F. It will be shown below tht for B F nd T ergodic, 1 n 1 lim χ n n B (T k x) = µ(b).e. (µ), (5) k=0 where χ B is the chrcteristic function of the set B, i.e. χ B (x) = 1 if x B, 0 otherwise. So if µ(b) > 0 then lmost every point of wnders into B infinitely often. 6

Let S n (x) = #{1 i n : T i x B} nd A n (x) = S n (x)/n. It is not obvious tht the limit lim n A n (x) will exist. We will show tht it does by looking t the limsup nd liminf of the sequence {A n (x)}. So let A(x) = lim sup A n (x) which is trivilly 1. Lemm 2 Let { n } be sequence for which lim sup n <. Let {b n } be sequence for which lim b n = 0. Then lim sup( n + b n ) = lim sup n. Proof Write A = lim sup n. Let ε > 0 be given. There exists N 1 such tht ε < b n < ε for ll n N 1 nd there exists N 2 such tht A ε < sup r < A + ε r n for ll n N 2. Choose N = mx(n 1, N 2 ), so tht for ll n N we hve which gives the result. Lemm 3 A 2ε < sup( r + b r ) < A + 2ε r n Proof A(T x) = A(x). A n (T x) = 1 n 1 i n χ B (T i (T x)) = 1 n 2 i n+1 = A n (x) + χ B(x) χ B (T n+1 x) n nd n ppliction of Lemm 2 gives the result. Theorem 4 χ B (T i x) The limit lim A n (x) exists. n Proof For given x we follow the orbit of x, nmely x, T x, T 2 x, T 3 x,.... We cll the exponent n in T n x, the time. Let ε > 0 be given. It might be tht for ll sufficiently lrge n we hve A n (x) > A(x) ε which obviously shows tht the limit exists. Otherwise the sequence {m j } defined by 7

m j = min{m > m j 1 : A m (x) > A(x) ε} hs infinitely mny gps. Note tht this sequence depends on x. The question must be how lrge cn these gps be? Define τ(x) = min{n : A n (x) > A(x) ε}. We first ssume tht there exists M such tht τ(x) < M.e. (µ). Let S be the exceptionl set here. Assume there is gp fter m j so A mj (x) > A(x) ε but A mj +1(x) A(x) ε. Then if T m j x / S we know there exists n < M such tht A n (T m j x) > A(T m j x) ε = A(x) ε by the lemm bove. So we hve both nd m j +1 i m j +n 1 i m j χ B (T i x) > m j (A(x) ε) χ B (T i x) = 1 i n Adding these two inequlities gives tht is 1 i m j +n χ B (T i (T m j x)) > n(a(x) ε). χ B (T i x) > (m j + n)(a(x) ε), A mj +n(x) > A(x) ε. Thus m j+1 m j + n < m j + M. So if T m j x / S, the gp m j+1 m j is less thn M. So if x / T k S k=1 set of mesure zero, ll the gps re less thn M. Thus given x / k=1 T k S nd given N choose j (which will depend on x s well N since the sequence of m j depends on x) such tht m j N < m j+1, then for lmost ll x we hve 8

S N (x) S mj (x) > m j (A(x) ε) > (N M)(A(x) ε). Since this inequlity is true for lmost ll x we cn integrte to get (A(x) ε)dµ = 1 N M 1 N M = Nµ(B) N M, n N χ T n Bdµ µ(t n B) since T is mesure preserving. Let N nd then ε 0 to deduce A(x)dµ µ(b). (6) The ssumption bove concerning M my not hold. Define S M = {x : τ(x) > M}, the collection of which is nested sequence of sets, S 1 S 2 S 3... From the definition of lim sup A n (x) we know tht given ε > 0 nd x there exists (infinitely mny) N such tht A N (x) > A(x) ε in which cse τ(x) N nd so x / S N. Let S = M 1 S M, then we hve seen tht x / S for ll x, tht is, S =. Since the S N re nested we cn thus find n M such tht µ(s M ) < ε. Let B = B S M. We pply the rguments bove with B replced by B, so S n(x) = #{1 i n : T i x B }, A n(x) = S n(x)/n nd A (x) = lim sup A n(x). We follow the method bove looking t the gps in the sequence of {m j }. If fter some m j we hve gp then A m j (x) > A (x) ε but A m j +1(x) A (x) ε, in prticulr A m j +1(x) < A m j (x). If it were the cse tht T m j+1 x B then n N A m j +1(x) = S m j (x) + χ B (T mj+1 x) m j + 1 > S m j (x) = A m m j (x), j = S m j (x) + 1 m j + 1 hving used the observtion tht D > C > 0 implies C+1 > C. Hence D+1 D we must hve T mj+1 x / B. In prticulr T mj+1 x / S M, in which cse 9

τ(t mj+1 x) M nd so, s in the rgument bove, the gp fter m j is bounded by M. Thus following the rgument tht led to (6) will led to A (x)dµ µ(b ). But A n(x) A n (x) for ll n in which cse A (x) A(x), while µ(b ) < µ(b) + ε. Let ε 0 to deduce A(x)dµ µ(b). Hence this inequlity holds whtever we ssume bout M. A similr rgument gives µ(b) A(x)dµ where A(x) = lim inf A n (x). Hence A(x)dµ = A(x)dµ = µ(b) (7) nd so A(x) = A(x) for.e. (µ) x. Hence lim n A n (x) exists for lmost every (µ) x (nd is integrble). The remining question must be wht is the vlue of this limit? From the definition of ergodic bove the pproprite one for the present sitution sttes tht whenever n integrble function f stisfies f(t x) = f(x) for.e. (µ) x in then f is constnt.e.(µ) on. From the lemm bove we hve tht A(T x) = A(x) for ll x nd so for the points t which the limit exists we hve lim n A n (T x) = lim n A n (x), i.e. this holds.e.(µ) on. Hence if T is ergodic we hve tht lim n A n (x) = c, constnt,.e.(µ). For the vlue of c use (7) tht shows tht µ(b) = lim A n(x)dµ = cdµ = cµ() = c, n since µ() = 1. Hence.e.(µ). #{1 i n : T i x B} lim n n = µ(b) 10