Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Similar documents
Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Fundamentals of Sound

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD. SFS-EN EUROCODE 1: ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES Part 1 3: General Actions. Snow loads

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering TRAFFIC AND AIRFLOW NOISE LEVEL PREDICTIONS FOR BUILDINGS WITH

FIRST, MORE ABOUT SOUND

DETERMINATION OF AIRBORNE SOUND POWER LEVELS EMITTED BY GEAR UNITS

CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE XIV. AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONING

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA

Baker House Dining Room: Thermal Balance Report. + Q c. + Q v. + Q s. + Q e. + Q heating. + Q appliances. =Q appliances,21h Q appliances, x H

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens

Uncertainties in Acoustics

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial

Energy Use in Homes 2007

Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

Section 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone

SHORELINE PROVISIONS RESIDENTIAL LOT

Traffic Impact Study

Energy Use in Homes 2004

CHRISTCHURCH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2013 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS NOISE MONITORING REPORT

Municipal Act, 2001 Loi de 2001 sur les municipalités

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie

2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

INSPIRE in the context of EC Directive 2002/49/EC on Environmental Noise

Turbines and turbine sets Measurement of emitted airborne noise Engineering/survey method

Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate

Transcription:

Transportation Noise Assessment 1003 Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-031 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Kent Bugatsch Inc. 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3K7 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc., Project Manager Joshua Foster, P.Eng, Associate Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. Original: April 10, 2013 Revision 1: July 10, 2014 Revision 2: July 30, 2014 127 Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613) 836-0934 F (613) 836-8183 www.gradientwind.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a traffic noise assessment performed for a proposed residential development consisting of seven single-family homes in Ottawa, Ontario. The houses will rise approximately six meters above grade level. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The major sources of roadway noise affecting the development is traffic along Colonel By Drive and Prince of Wales Drive. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan right of way allowances; and (iv) architectural drawings received from. The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 39 and 69 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 31 and 61 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest traffic noise levels will occur along the west side of the development, nearest to Prince of Wales Drive. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, the following Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba at Unit #1 (see Figures 4 and 5). Living Room Windows (i) Living room windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 27 (ii) Living room windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 24 (iii) All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Bedroom Windows (i) Bedroom windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 32 (ii) Bedroom windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 29 (iii) All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment i

Exterior Walls (i) Exterior wall components on the north and west façades of Unit #1, closest to Prince of Wales Drive will require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 1 A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any specific window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. Since noise levels exceed 65 dba at the plane of window on Unit #1, the installation of individual air conditioning will be required. The following Warning Clause (Type D 2 ) in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale will be required: This dwelling unit has been supplied with central air conditioning which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. For all remaining units where noise levels at the plane of window are less than 65 dba, building components satisfying minimum OBC requirements will be sufficient. In addition, the installation of forced air heating with provisions for individual air conditioning in all remaining units will be required. 1 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October 2000 2 MOE, LU-131 Noise Assessment in Land Use Planning, Tables 1 & 2, page 8 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment ii

The following Warning Clause (Type C 3 ) in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale will be required for all remaining units: This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to comply with noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts both on and off the immediate vicinity of the subject property). Should the backyards be considered the primary outdoor amenity area, the noise levels at these areas are expected to approach 68 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 7 (Section 5), and illustrated in Figure 6. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba with the application of a noise barrier along the property line. Where mitigated noise levels could not be reduced from above 65 dba to 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 4 ) is required for Unit #1: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Should the balconies be considered the primary outdoor amenity area, the noise levels at these areas are expected to approach 65 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 8 (Section 5), and illustrated in Figure 7. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba with the application of a 3 ibid 4 MOE Publication NPC-300 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment iii

noise barrier on the balcony. Although remaining noise levels are above 55 dba, it is economically not feasible to reduce to 55 dba. As such, Units #1-3 will require a Type B Warning Clause (see above), while Unit #4 will require a Type A Warning Clause: Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Additionally, the following restrictive covenant shall also be included in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale: The Transferee covenants with the Transferor that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent Agreements of Purchase and Sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of the subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 3. OBJECTIVES 1 4. METHODOLOGY 2 4.1 Background 2 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise 2 4.2.1 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise 2 4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes 5 4.2.3 Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions 5 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations 6 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 7 5.1 Roadway Noise Levels 7 5.2 STC Requirements 8 5.3 Noise Barrier Calculation 9 5.3.1 At-Grade Amenity Area 10 5.3.2 Balcony Amenity Area 10 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment v

1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE), formerly Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. (GME), was retained by Inc. to undertake a transportation noise study of the proposed residential development at 1003 Prince of Wales Drive in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results and recommendations related to a traffic noise assessment. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic. The assessment was performed on the basis of theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 5 and Ministry of the Environment 6 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings received from with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP). 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this environmental noise assessment is a proposed residential development consisting of seven single-family homes. The development is located 600 meters north of the intersection of Prince of Wales Drive and Baseline Road/Heron Road. The major sources of roadway noise are Colonel By Drive and Prince of Wales Drive. The site is surrounded by the Experimental Farm to the north and west, Rideau Canal to the east and residential housing to the south. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. Upon completion, the houses will rise approximately eight meters above grade level. Detailed floor plans were not available at the time of this study. Each unit is provided a balcony and at-grade backyard amenity area. 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study buildings produced by local roadway traffic and (ii) ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines as outlined in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of this report. 5 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, 2006 6 MOE, LU-131 Noise Assessment in Land Use Planning, Tables 1 & 2, page 8 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 1

4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level (2 10-5 Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise 4.2.1 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For vehicle traffic, the equivalent sound energy level, L EQ, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L EQ is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour (L EQ16 ) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L EQ8 ) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impact on residential buildings. The Ministry of the Environment s document NPC-300 specifies that the recommended indoor noise limit ranges (that are relevant to this study) are 45 dba for living and dining areas and 40 dba for sleeping quarters of residences, as listed in Table 1. Based on GWE s experience, more comfortable indoor noise levels should be targeted toward 42 dba and 37 dba (for living rooms and bedrooms, respectively) to control peak noise and deficiencies in building envelope construction. 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 2

TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL LIMITS (ROAD & RAIL) Type of Space Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, nursing homes, schools, daycare centres, etc. Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, nursing homes, etc. (except schools or daycare centres) Sleeping quarters Time Period L EQ (dba) Road Rail 07:00 23:00 45 40 23:00 07:00 45 40 07:00 23:00 45 40 23:00 07:00 40 35 Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) and outdoor living area (OLA) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. When noise levels at these areas exceed the criteria outlined in Table 2, specific outdoor, ventilation and warning clause requirements may apply. In addition, when noise levels exceed the criteria outlined in Table 3, upgraded building components must be designed. 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 3

TABLE 2: ROAD & RAIL NOISE COMBINED OUTDOOR, VENTILATION AND WARNING CLAUSE REQUIREMENTS Time Period L EQ (dba) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Noise Control Measures Warning Clause Outdoor Living Area (OLA) L EQ(16hr) < 55 N/A Not required Not required Daytime (07:00 23:00) 55 < L EQ(16hr) 60 N/A L EQ(16hr) > 60 N/A May be applied to reduce the sound level to 55 dba Should be implemented to reduce the sound level to 55 dba Type A Type B Plane of Window (POW) L EQ(16hr) < 55 Not required N/A Not required Daytime (07:00 23:00) 55 < L EQ(16hr) 65 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(16hr) > 65 Central air conditioning N/A Type D L EQ(8hr) < 50 Not required N/A Not required Nighttime (23:00 07:00) 50 < L EQ(8hr) 60 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(8hr) > 60 Central air conditioning N/A Type D - If noise control measures are not provided - If it s not feasible for administrative, economic or technical reasons and the sound level does not exceed 60 dba TABLE 3: ROAD & RAIL NOISE BUILDING COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS Source L EQ (dba) Building Component Requirements Road Rail L EQ(16hr) > 65 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 60 (Nighttime) L EQ(16hr) > 60 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 55(Nighttime) Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 4

4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes For future traffic noise predictions, the MOE document NPC-300 requires the use of the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes, projected to exist ten years into the future, with an average annual growth rate of 2% per year. In contrast, the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) requires that the AADT volumes should be based on roadway allowances, which are defined by the Right of Way (ROW) protection values identified in the OP for specific roadways. To ensure compliance with the reasonable worst-case situation, the following steps were taken; Recent counted traffic data were acquired from the City of Ottawa and the Ministry of Transportation, upon which a growth rate of 2% per year was applied and extrapolated ten years in the future to the future. Traffic volumes based on roadway ROW values were obtained from the City of Ottawa Official Plan 7 (Annex 1 Road Classification and Rights of Way). For roadways where the ROW information was unavailable, the designation was assumed based on the size of the existing road and available traffic information In all cases, the higher of the OP versus projected values were used to calculate future noise levels. Table 4 summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. TABLE 4: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Roadway Roadway Class Speed Limit (km/h) Official Plan AADT Available Traffic AADT From Count Year of Traffic AADT Projected 2023 AADT Colonel By Drive Federal 60 N/A 15,736 2000 24,814 Prince of Wales Drive 4-UAU 60 30,000 N/A N/A N/A - Traffic volumes taken from Ministry of Transportation 4.2.3 Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road and rail analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. 7 www.ottawa.ca/city_hall/ottawa2020/official_plan/vol_1/07_annexes/annex_01/index_en.html 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 5

Roadway noise calculations were performed by treating each road segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. The surrounding building massing, roadway layout geometry and site plan information was received from Barry J. Hobin & Associates Architects. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 4, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks, as per ENCG requirements for noise level predictions The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics The study site was treated as having flat topography Noise receptors were strategically placed at 17 locations around the study area (see Figures 2 and 3). 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness and interior finish details. For example, brick veneered walls can achieve STC 55. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40 depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, the windows are the known weak point in a partition. According to NPC-300, when daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. The calculation procedure considers: Window type and total area as a percentage of total room floor area Exterior wall type and total area as a percentage of the total room floor area Acoustic absorption characteristics of the room Outdoor noise source type and approach geometry Indoor sound level criteria, which varies according to the intended use of a space 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 6

Based on published research, exterior walls possess specific sound attenuation characteristics that are used as a basis for calculating the required STC ratings of windows in the same partition. Due to the limited information available at the time of the study, which was prepared for site plan approval, detailed floor layouts and building elevations have not been finalized; therefore, detailed STC calculations could not be performed at this time. As a guideline, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Noise Levels Appendix A contains the complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations. The results of the roadway noise calculations are summarized in Table 5 below. TABLE 5: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROAD TRAFFIC Receptor Number Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW Unit #1 North Façade 66 58 2 POW Unit #2 North Façade 63 55 3 POW Unit #4 North Façade 61 54 4 POW Unit #7 West Façade 58 51 5 POW Unit #6 East Façade 57 49 6 POW Unit #5 West Façade 53 46 7 POW Unit #4 South Façade 56 49 8 POW Unit #1 South Façade 62 54 9 POW Unit #1 West Façade 69 61 10 OLA Unit #1 North Side 68 60 11 OLA Unit #2 North Side 63 56 12 OLA Unit #4 North Side 60 52 13 OLA Unit #7 East Side 39 31 14 OLA Unit #1 Balcony 65 57 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 7

TABLE 5: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROAD TRAFFIC (CONT D) Receptor Number Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 15 OLA Unit #2 Balcony 62 54 16 OLA Unit #3 Balcony 61 54 17 OLA Unit #4 Balcony 60 52 The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 39 and 69 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 31 and 61 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 69 dba) occurs on the west side of Unit #1, which is closest to Prince of Wales Drive. 5.2 STC Requirements The noise levels predicted due to road traffic exceed the criteria listed in Table 1.8 of the ENCG for building components. As discussed in Section 4.3 the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). As per city of Ottawa requirements, detailed STC calculations will be required to be completed prior to building permit application for each unit type. The STC requirements for the windows are summarised below for Unit #1 where noise levels exceed the ENCG criteria of 65 dba (see Figures 4 and 5): Living Room Windows (i) Living room windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 27 (ii) Living room windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 24 (iii) All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Bedroom Windows (i) Bedroom windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 32 (ii) Bedroom windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 29 (iii) All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 8

Exterior Walls (i) Exterior wall components on the north and west façades of Unit #1, closest to Prince of Wales Drive will require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 8 A review of window supplier literature indicates that these levels can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any specific window configuration, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. Results of the calculations also indicate Unit #1 will require central air conditioning, or similar mechanical ventilation, which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. All remaining units within the development will require forced ait heating with provisions for central air conditioning. In addition to ventilation requirements, Warning Clauses will also be required be placed on all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Table 6 below. TABLE 6: SITE VENTILATION AND WARNING CLAUSE REQUIREMENTS Location Unit #1 Unit #2-7 Ventilation Requirement Individual Air Conditioning Forced Air Heating with Provisions for Individual Air Conditioning Warning Clause Type D Type C 5.3 Noise Barrier Calculation Units 1 through 4 are provided two outdoor amenity areas, one at grade and a balcony. In the case where one of these areas is designated the primary amenity area, two separate noise barrier calculations were completed, and presented below. 8 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October 2000 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 9

5.3.1 At-Grade Amenity Area Noise levels at the backyards are expected to approach 68 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 7 below, and illustrated in Figure 6. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba. Where mitigated noise levels could not be reduced from above 65 dba to 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 9 ) is required. TABLE 7: RESULTS OF BARRIER INVESTIGATION AT-GRADE AMENITY AREA Receptor Number Location Barrier Height (m) Daytime L EQ Noise Levels (dba) Without Barrier With Barrier Warning Clause 10 Unit #1 3.0 68 56 Type B 11 Units #2, #3 2.5 63 54 N/A 12 Unit #4 2.0 60 54 N/A 5.3.2 Balcony Amenity Area Noise levels on the balconies are expected to approach 65 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 8 below, and illustrated in Figure 7. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba. Where mitigated noise levels could not be reduced from above 65 dba to 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 10 ) is required. 9 MOE Publication NPC-300 10 ibid 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 10

TABLE 8: RESULTS OF BARRIER INVESTIGATION BALCONY AMENITY AREA Receptor Number Location Barrier Height (m) Daytime L EQ Noise Levels (dba) Without Barrier With Barrier Warning Clause 14 Unit #1 2.5 65 56 Type B 15 Unit #2 1.8 62 56 Type B 16 Unit #3 1.8 61 56 Type B 17 Unit #4 1.5 60 56 Type A 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 11

7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 39 and 69 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 31 and 61 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest traffic noise levels will occur along the west side of the development, nearest to Prince of Wales Drive. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, the following Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba at Unit #1 (see Figures 4 and 5). Living Room Windows (i) Living room windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 27 (ii) Living room windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 24 (iii) All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Bedroom Windows (i) Bedroom windows facing west on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 32 (ii) Bedroom windows facing north on Unit #1 will require a minimum STC of 29 (iii) All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements (i) Exterior Walls Exterior wall components on the north and west façades of Unit #1, closest to Prince of Wales Drive will require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 11 A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any specific window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building 11 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October 2000 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 12

components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. Since noise levels exceed 65 dba at the plane of window on Unit #1, the installation of individual air conditioning will be required. The following Warning Clause (Type D 12 ) in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale will be required for all units: This dwelling unit has been supplied with central air conditioning which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. For all remaining units where noise levels at the plane of window are less than 65 dba, building components satisfying minimum OBC requirements will be sufficient. In addition the installation of forced air heating with provisions for individual air conditioning in all remaining units will be required. The following Warning Clause (Type C 13 ) in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale will be required: This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to comply with noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts both on and off the immediate vicinity of the subject property). Should the backyards be considered the primary outdoor amenity area, the noise levels at these areas are expected to approach 68 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 7 (Section 5), and illustrated in Figure 6. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba with the application of a 12 MOE LU-131 Noise Assessment In Land Use Planning, Tables 1 & 2, page 8 13 ibid 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 13

noise barrier on the property line. Where mitigated noise levels could not be reduced from above 65 dba to 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 14 ) is required for Unit #1: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Should the balconies be considered the primary outdoor amenity area, the noise levels at these areas are expected to approach 65 dba during the daytime period. According to ENCG, if these areas are to be used as outdoor living spaces, noise control measures should be implemented to reduce noise levels to 55 dba. The results of the barrier investigation are summarized in Table 8 (Section 5), and illustrated in Figure 7. Noise levels at all outdoor receptors can be reduced to below 60 dba with the application of a noise barrier on the balcony. Although remaining noise levels are above 55 dba, it is economically not feasible to reduce to 55 dba. As such, Units #1-3 will require a Type B Warning Clause (see above) while Unit #4 will require a Type A Warning Clause: Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Additionally, the following restrictive covenant shall also be included in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale: The Transferee covenants with the Transferor that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent Agreements of Purchase and Sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of the subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. 14 MOE Publication NPC-300 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment Page 14

APPENDIX A STAMSON 5.04 INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 1

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2013 10:47:09 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 20089/1747 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1598/139 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1141/99 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24814 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 179.00 / 179.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 2

Road data, segment # 2: POW 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: POW 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -28.00 deg 48.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 25.00 / 25.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 3

Road data, segment # 3: POW 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: POW 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -89.00 deg -78.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: CBY (day) ROAD (0.00 + 50.96 + 0.00) = 50.96 dba -90 0 0.57 72.18 0.00-16.91-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.96 Segment Leq : 50.96 dba Results segment # 2: POW 1 (day) 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 4

ROAD (0.00 + 65.55 + 0.00) = 65.55 dba -28 48 0.57 73.01 0.00-3.48-3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.55 Segment Leq : 65.55 dba Results segment # 3: POW 2 (day) ROAD (0.00 + 55.32 + 0.00) = 55.32 dba -89-78 0.57 73.01 0.00 0.00-17.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.32 Segment Leq : 55.32 dba Total Leq All Segments: 66.08 dba Results segment # 1: CBY (night) Source height = 1.49 m ROAD (0.00 + 43.36 + 0.00) = 43.36 dba -90 0 0.57 64.58 0.00-16.91-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.36 Segment Leq : 43.36 dba Results segment # 2: POW 1 (night) ROAD (0.00 + 57.95 + 0.00) = 57.95 dba 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 5

-28 48 0.57 65.41 0.00-3.48-3.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.95 Segment Leq : 57.95 dba Results segment # 3: POW 2 (night) ROAD (0.00 + 47.72 + 0.00) = 47.72 dba -89-78 0.57 65.41 0.00 0.00-17.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.72 Segment Leq : 47.72 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.48 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 66.08 (NIGHT): 58.48 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 6

1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 7

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2013 10:47:17 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: POW (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: POW (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -27.00 deg 34.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 34.80 / 34.80 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 8

Road data, segment # 2: CBY (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 20089/1747 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1598/139 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1141/99 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24814 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: CBY (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 168.00 / 168.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 9

Results segment # 1: POW (day) ROAD (0.00 + 62.44 + 0.00) = 62.44 dba -27 34 0.57 73.01 0.00-5.74-4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.44 Segment Leq : 62.44 dba Results segment # 2: CBY (day) ROAD (0.00 + 51.39 + 0.00) = 51.39 dba -90 0 0.57 72.18 0.00-16.47-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.39 Segment Leq : 51.39 dba Total Leq All Segments: 62.77 dba Results segment # 1: POW (night) ROAD (0.00 + 54.85 + 0.00) = 54.85 dba -27 34 0.57 65.41 0.00-5.74-4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.85 Segment Leq : 54.85 dba 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 10

Results segment # 2: CBY (night) Source height = 1.49 m ROAD (0.00 + 43.79 + 0.00) = 43.79 dba -90 0 0.57 64.58 0.00-16.47-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.79 Segment Leq : 43.79 dba Total Leq All Segments: 55.18 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 62.77 (NIGHT): 55.18 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 11

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2013 10:47:35 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 20089/1747 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1598/139 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1141/99 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24814 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 147.00 / 147.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 12

Road data, segment # 2: POW 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: POW 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -27.00 deg 15.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 54.00 / 54.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 13

Road data, segment # 3: POW 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 3: POW 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : 69.00 deg 87.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 20.00 / 20.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: CBY (day) ROAD (0.00 + 52.30 + 0.00) = 52.30 dba -90 0 0.57 72.18 0.00-15.56-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.30 Segment Leq : 52.30 dba Results segment # 2: POW 1 (day) ROAD (0.00 + 57.88 + 0.00) = 57.88 dba 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 14

-27 15 0.57 73.01 0.00-8.73-6.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.88 Segment Leq : 57.88 dba Results segment # 3: POW 2 (day) ROAD (0.00 + 57.03 + 0.00) = 57.03 dba 69 87 0.57 73.01 0.00-1.96-14.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.03 Segment Leq : 57.03 dba Total Leq All Segments: 61.10 dba Results segment # 1: CBY (night) Source height = 1.49 m ROAD (0.00 + 44.70 + 0.00) = 44.70 dba -90 0 0.57 64.58 0.00-15.56-4.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.70 Segment Leq : 44.70 dba Results segment # 2: POW 1 (night) 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 15

ROAD (0.00 + 50.29 + 0.00) = 50.29 dba -27 15 0.57 65.41 0.00-8.73-6.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.29 Segment Leq : 50.29 dba Results segment # 3: POW 2 (night) ROAD (0.00 + 49.44 + 0.00) = 49.44 dba 69 87 0.57 65.41 0.00-1.96-14.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.44 Segment Leq : 49.44 dba Total Leq All Segments: 53.51 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 61.10 (NIGHT): 53.51 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 16

1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 17

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2013 10:47:44 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: POW 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: POW 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 6.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 69.00 / 69.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : -19.00 deg Barrier height : 6.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 48.00 / 48.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 18

Road data, segment # 2: POW 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 30000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 2: POW 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : 60.00 deg 85.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 35.00 / 35.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 19

Results segment # 1: POW 1 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 4.50! 2.41! 2.41 ROAD (0.00 + 49.80 + 53.99) = 55.39 dba -90-19 0.21 73.01 0.00-8.02-4.76 0.00 0.00-10.43 49.80-19 6 0.57 73.01 0.00-10.41-8.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.99 Segment Leq : 55.39 dba Results segment # 2: POW 2 (day) ROAD (0.00 + 55.56 + 0.00) = 55.56 dba 60 85 0.57 73.01 0.00-5.78-11.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.56 Segment Leq : 55.56 dba Total Leq All Segments: 58.49 dba 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 20

Results segment # 1: POW 1 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) +-+-+ 1.50! 4.50! 2.41! 2.41 ROAD (0.00 + 42.20 + 46.39) = 47.80 dba -90-19 0.21 65.41 0.00-8.02-4.76 0.00 0.00-10.43 42.20-19 6 0.57 65.41 0.00-10.41-8.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.39 Segment Leq : 47.80 dba Results segment # 2: POW 2 (night) ROAD (0.00 + 47.97 + 0.00) = 47.97 dba 60 85 0.57 65.41 0.00-5.78-11.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.97 Segment Leq : 47.97 dba Total Leq All Segments: 50.90 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 58.49 (NIGHT): 50.90 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 21

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 10-04-2013 10:47:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 20089/1747 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1598/139 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1141/99 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 24814 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.00 Data for Segment # 1: CBY (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 117.00 / 117.00 m Receiver height : 4.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 1003 Prince of Wales Drive, Ottawa, Ontario: Traffic Noise Assessment A 22