PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

Similar documents
763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

1 Vectors over the complex numbers

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 29 Jun 2018

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 23 October 2013

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Explicit constructions of all separable two-qubits density matrices and related problems for three-qubits systems

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

Non-interacting Spin-1/2 Particles in Non-commuting External Magnetic Fields

Singular Value Decomposition: Theory and Applications

The Feynman path integral

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

An Inequality for the trace of matrix products, using absolute values

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

where the sums are over the partcle labels. In general H = p2 2m + V s(r ) V j = V nt (jr, r j j) (5) where V s s the sngle-partcle potental and V nt

2. Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. [Last revised: Friday 7 th December, 2018, 21:27]

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

Phys304 Quantum Physics II (2005) Quantum Mechanics Summary. 2. This kind of behaviour can be described in the mathematical language of vectors:

Homework Notes Week 7

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

PES 1120 Spring 2014, Spendier Lecture 6/Page 1

Solutions to Chapter 1 exercises

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

ρ some λ THE INVERSE POWER METHOD (or INVERSE ITERATION) , for , or (more usually) to

Note on the Electron EDM

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

CSCE 790S Background Results

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES EXAMPLES OF C ALGEBRAS

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 12 November 2008

An Introduction to Morita Theory

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

Spin. Introduction. Michael Fowler 11/26/06

= = = (a) Use the MATLAB command rref to solve the system. (b) Let A be the coefficient matrix and B be the right-hand side of the system.

Lecture notes for the course: Quantum Information

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

Norms, Condition Numbers, Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

The Dirac Equation for a One-electron atom. In this section we will derive the Dirac equation for a one-electron atom.

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

Quantum Statistical Mechanics

MATH Homework #2

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

arxiv:quant-ph/ Jul 2002

LECTURE 9 CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

10.40 Appendix Connection to Thermodynamics and Derivation of Boltzmann Distribution

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

BOUNDEDNESS OF THE RIESZ TRANSFORM WITH MATRIX A 2 WEIGHTS

Difference Equations

Lecture 10: May 6, 2013

Structure and Drive Paul A. Jensen Copyright July 20, 2003

STAT 309: MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS I FALL 2018 LECTURE 16

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

Robert Eisberg Second edition CH 09 Multielectron atoms ground states and x-ray excitations

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Time-Varying Systems and Computations Lecture 6

Physics 607 Exam 1. ( ) = 1, Γ( z +1) = zγ( z) x n e x2 dx = 1. e x2

Lecture 5 Decoding Binary BCH Codes

5 The Rational Canonical Form

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

Dynamic Systems on Graphs

GELFAND-TSETLIN BASIS FOR THE REPRESENTATIONS OF gl n

Random Walks on Digraphs

9 Characteristic classes

The lower and upper bounds on Perron root of nonnegative irreducible matrices

Grover s Algorithm + Quantum Zeno Effect + Vaidman

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

8. Superfluid to Mott-insulator transition

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

e - c o m p a n i o n

A New Refinement of Jacobi Method for Solution of Linear System Equations AX=b

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Spectral Methods and Expanders Handout 8 Luca Trevisan February 17, 2016

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

5.03, Inorganic Chemistry Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Lecture 2 May 11: Ligand Field Theory

First day August 1, Problems and Solutions

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

Composite Hypotheses testing

Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

MATH 5707 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS 2. 2 i 2p i E(X i ) + E(Xi 2 ) ä i=1. i=1

2 More examples with details

Transcription:

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Prof. Matthew Fsher Solutons prepared by: Chatanya Murthy and James Sully June 4, 07 Please let me know f you encounter any typos n the solutons. Problem 0 a Let and label the two z-bass states of a spn-/ partcle. The quantum state wth equal ampltude to be spn-up and spn-down s ψ = +. The correspondng pure state densty matrx s ρ p = ψ ψ = + + + On the other hand, the densty matrx descrbng a mxture of the two bass states wth equal probablty s ρ m = + We have ˆσ z p = Trˆσ z ρ p = ˆσ z + ˆσ z + ˆσ z + ˆσ z = + 0 + 0 = 0 3 ˆσ z m = Trˆσ z ρ m = ˆσ z + ˆσ z = = 0 4 but ˆσ x p = Trˆσ z ρ p = ˆσ x + ˆσ x + ˆσ x + ˆσ x = 0 + + + 0 = 5 ˆσ x m = Trˆσ x ρ m = ˆσ x + ˆσ x = 0 + 0 = 0 6 Thus, the two stuatons lead to the same result for ˆσ z but dfferent results for ˆσ x. Ths result s obvous f one notces that ψ s the state wth defnte spn-up along the x-axs. b Consder the densty matrx for a spn-/ partcle wth magnetc moment µ n a magnetc feld, wth Hamltonan Ĥ = gµ ˆσ 7

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Page where g s a constant. The equaton of moton for the densty operator s d dt ˆρt = [ Ĥ, ˆρt ] = gµ j[ˆσ j, ˆρt ] 8 where a sum over j =,, 3 s mpled. Tracng both sdes wth ˆσ k yelds d dt Trˆσ k ρt = gµ j Tr ˆσ k[ˆσ j, ˆρt ] 9 Snce the trace s both lnear and cyclc, Tr ˆσ k[ˆσ j, ˆρ ] = Tr ˆσ kˆσ j ˆρ ˆσ k ˆρ ˆσ j = Tr ˆσ kˆσ j ˆρ ˆσ j ˆσ k ˆρ = Tr [ˆσ k, ˆσ j]ˆρ = ε kjl Tr ˆσ l ˆρ 0 where the last equalty follows from the commutaton relatons of the Paul matrces. Usng ths n??, d dt Trˆσ k ρt = gµ j ε kjl Tr ˆσ l ˆρt Swtchng to vector notaton and dentfyng the polarzaton vector P = Tr ˆσ ˆρt, ths gves whch s what we d expect classcally. dp dt = gµ P Problem 0 Consder a bpartte quantum system bult from a drect product Hlbert space of the two parts, H = H H. Let the dmenson of H be n and that of H be N n. The Schmdt decomposton states that, gven any quantum state Φ n the full Hlbert space, there always exst orthonormal sets, ψ, φ j wth, j =,,... n, such that Φ = n v ψ φ 3 where the v are nonnegatve real numbers satsfyng the normalzaton condton n = v =. = a For notatonal convenence, I ll wrte ψ φ nstead of ψ φ, and so on. Usng the above Schmdt form of Φ, t s easy to obtan expressons for the reduced densty matrces: ˆρ = Tr Φ Φ = n v vj ψ ψ j Tr φ φ j =,j= n v vj ψ ψ j δ j =,j= n v ψ = ψ 4 and smlarly ˆρ = Tr Φ Φ = n v vj Tr ψ ψ j φ φ j =,j= n,j= v v j δ j φ φ j = n = v φ φ 5 It s clear from these expressons that the reduced densty matrces are Hermtan wth egenvalues λ = v and assocated egenvectors ψ, φ.

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Page 3 b Now consder two spn-/ partcles, labelled and, n a normalzed pure state Φ = + + 6 straghtforward calculaton gves the reduced densty matrx for partcle : and that for partcle : ˆρ = + + + 7 ˆρ = 4 + 4 3 + + 8 4 The egenvalues and correspondng normalzed egenvectors of ˆρ are whle those of ˆρ are λ ± = 4 λ ± = 4 ±, ψ ± = ± ± [ ], φ ± = ± + 9 0 The egenvalues agree, as they should. Comparng wth the result of part a, we obtan the Schmdt decomposton of the state Φ as Φ = λ + ψ + φ + + λ ψ φ Problem 3 0 Consder a two-ste verson of the quantum Isng model n a transverse feld wth Hamltonan Ĥ = J ˆσ z ˆσ z hˆσ x hˆσ x where the two spn-/ operators are gven by Ŝµ j = ˆσµ j. convenent orthonormal bass of states whch spans the full Hlbert space for ths model conssts of a drect product of egenstates of ˆσ z denoted φ = ; φ = ; φ 3 = ; φ 4 =. 3 a To compute h αβ = φ α Ĥ φ β, we use the fact that Ĥ = J ˆσ z ˆσ z hˆσ + + ˆσ hˆσ+ + ˆσ 4 n terms of σ z rasng and lowerng operators. Then we can smply explctly calculate the matrx elements. Some basc algebra gves J 0 h h h αβ = 0 J h h h h J 0 5 h h 0 J

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Page 4 b Usng your favourte method, you can fnd the lowest egenvalue s E 0 = J + h 6 wth egenvector Ψ 0 = φ, 7 where = α α α +, α = h h J + h J = E 0 + J 8 c and d Let Then and α = N α 9 α α α α ˆρ = Ψ 0 Ψ 0 = N α α α α α α 30 α α ˆρ = Tr ˆρ = N α + α / h α α = h + 4h / +J 4h +J = / h/e0 h/e 0 / 3 e We all know how to calculate the egenvalues of a matrx. The egenvalues are: λ ± = ± h E 0 = ± h/j h/j + 3 f The von Neumann b-partte entanglement entropy s defned as S = Tr ˆρ ln ˆρ = λ ln λ 33 We fnd where λ ± are defned n part e. S = λ + ln λ + λ ln λ 34

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Page 5 g s h/j, we have that λ + and λ 0. Thus the entropy becomes S = 0 35 s h/j 0, we have that λ + / and λ /. Thus the entropy becomes S = / ln + / ln = ln 36 When h/j >>, the J term can be gnored and the Hamltonan factorzes; there s no couplng between the two stes. Thus, there s no entanglement. When h/j <<, the J term that couples the two stes domnates and there s maxmal entanglement. Problem 4 0 a The sx possble states wth two electrons are φ = ĉ ĉ 0 φ = ĉ ĉ 0 φ 3 = ĉ ĉ 0 φ 4 = ĉ ĉ 0 φ 5 = ĉ ĉ 0 φ 6 = ĉ ĉ 0 b The states that have total spn zero along the z-drecton are just the frst four states lsted n part a. c We now compute the matrx elements h j = φ Ĥ φ j of the -ste Hubbard Hamltonan Ĥ = t ĉ σĉσ + ĉ σĉσ + U ˆn ˆn + ˆn ˆn 37 σ=, n the spn zero sector. Usng the antcommutaton relatons for the fermonc operators gves 0 0 t t h = 0 0 t t t t U 0 38 t t 0 U Your matrx may look dfferent by permutaton of the bass states or by factors of f you defned some of your bass states wth a dfferent phase.

PHYS 5C: Quantum Mechancs Sprng 07 Problem Set 3 Solutons Page 6 d Usng your favourte method, fnd the egenvalues and egenvectors of the matrx n part c. The lowest egenvalue s E 0 = U 6t + U 39 The egenvector s gven by Ψ 0 = α α α +, α = 4t 6t + U U = t 40 E 0 We wll also express ths state as Ψ 0 = φ. e The ground-state densty matrx s gven by and the correspondng reduced densty matrx by ˆρ = Ψ 0 Ψ 0 4 ˆρ = Tr ˆρ 4 Let 0,,, denote respectvely the four states on ste no electron on ste, an up-spn electron present on ste, a down-spn electron present on ste, both an up and a down spn electron present on ste, and smlarly for ste. Notng that φ = δ,, φ = δ,, 0 φ = δ,3, φ = δ,4 0, 43 the trace gves ˆρ = + + 3 + 4 0 0 44 f We see that the reduced densty matrx s already dagonal. The von Neumann entropy s then gven by S = λ ln λ = 4 ln 4 3 ln 3 45 snce = and 4 = 3. In the lmt U/t, we have that α U t =, 3 0 46 so that S = ln 47 We could have predcted ths because n the U/t lmt, the term that domnates prefers to have one electron on each ste no hoppng, but couples the spns on the two stes n a maxmally entangled state.