A new transformation including deformation model for the Nordic. and Baltic countries

Similar documents
A New Transformation Including Deformation Model for the Nordic and Baltic Countries

On the Use of Crustal Deformation Models. in the Management of ETRS89 Realizations in Fennoscandia

The NKG2008 GPS campaign final transformation results and a new common Nordic reference frame

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part II : ITRS & ETRS89 relationship

EUREF Technical Note 1: Relationship and Transformation between the International and the European Terrestrial Reference Systems

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 91 (2012), REALIZATION OF ETRF2000 AS A NEW TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAME IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

On the Management of Reference Frames in Sweden

SESSION 1.2 REGIONAL AND NATIONAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS. Rome

A Strategic Plan for Geodesy in Sweden. Mikael Lilje Lars E. Engberg Geodesy Department Lantmäteriet Sweden

The EPN CB Coordinate Transformation Tool

Geodesy on the move. Craig Allinson. Dealing with dynamic coordinate reference systems. IOGP Geodesy Subcommittee. EPUG London, November 2017

Geodetic Department KTIMATOLOGIO S.A. (Hellenic Cadastre) K. Katsampalos, C. Kotsakis Department of Geodesy and Surveying

National Report of Sweden to the EUREF 2004 Symposium

Geodetic Observing Systems: tools in observing the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute

A New Co-ordinate System for Sweden

A New Co-ordinate System for Sweden

Recent GNSS Developments and Reference Frame Issues in Turkey. Onur LENK and Bahadir AKTUĞ

Realizing a geodetic reference frame using GNSS in the presence of crustal deformations: The case of Greece

A New Co-ordinate System for Sweden

Memo : Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign

The BIFROST Project: 21 years of search for the true crustal deformation in Fennoscandia

Dealing with significant differential tectonic plate velocities within an RTK-network: The case of HEPOS

Reference Systems. Paolo Zatelli - Alfonso Vitti. Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento

UN Resolution on GGRF ( and its implementation in Europe)

NKG2016LU, an improved postglacial land uplift model over the Nordic-Baltic region

Preparation for the ITRF2013. Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux Laurent Métivier IGN, France

Verification of GNSS data in Estonia

Brussels, BELGIUM. Bojan Stopar. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering

Title: Impact of Regional Reference Frame Definition on Geodynamic Interpretations

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part I : General concepts

Status Report on the Working Group on "European Dense Velocities" Simon Lutz, Elmar Brockmann and members of the EUREF Working Group

The Difference between the N60 and BK77 Height Systems

International boundaries on a dynamic planet issues relating to plate tectonics and reference frame changes

Specification of the Baltic Sea Chart Datum 2000 (BSCD2000)

Definition and Realization of the EVRS: How do we want to proceed?

Influence of the Reference Frame Alignment on Station Positions and Velocities: Global or Regional?

Tectonic deformations in Greece and the operation of HEPOS network

UN-GGIM: Europe GRF-Europe. Markku Poutanen

Estimation of tectonic velocities using GPS Precise Point Positioning: The case of Hellenic RTK network HEPOS

Semi-Dynamic Datum of Indonesia

A Deformation Model to support a Next Generation Australian Geodetic Datum

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

NORDISKA KOMMISSIONEN FÖR GEODESI

The European height reference system and its realizations

Current status of the ITRS realization

NEW GEODETIC REFERENCE FRAME KOSOVAREV 01

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

Case Study of Australia

Do we need new definitions for the EVRS and EVRF?

GGSP: Realisation of the Galileo Terrestrial Reference Frame

Update on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) : ITRF2014. Zuheir Altamimi

Geodetic applications of GNSS in the Black Sea region

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

The European Surveying Plot A surveying map of land property: A proposal and it s perspectives

CHILEAN PART OF SIRGAS REFERENCE FRAME, REALIZATION, ADOPTION, MAINTENANCE AND ACTUAL STATUS. Geodesy for Planet Earth IAG 2009, Buenos Aires

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

Status of the geodetic control of Lithuania and further movements

National Report of Greece to EUREF 2016

United States NSRS 2022: Terrestrial Reference Frames

GGOS, ECGN and NGOS: Global and regional geodetic observing systems. Markku Poutanen Finish Geodetic Institute

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

REGIONAL REFERENCE FRAMES: THE IAG PERSPECTIVE

GGOS The Global Geodetic Observing System of the International Association of Geodesy

ONE YEAR WITH OUR ABSOLUTE GRAVIMETER

ITRF2014 Et la prise en compte des mouvements non linéaires

Next Generation Australian Datum. Permanent Committee on Geodesy, ICSM

Consideration of a Global Vertical Reference System (GVRS) in the IERS Conventions

European Vertical Reference System Influence in Latvia

CORS Network and Datum Harmonisation in the Asia-Pacific Region. Richard Stanaway and Craig Roberts

Reference Systems Realization for the Territory of Bulgaria - Status and Perspectives

National Report of Sweden

Military Geographic Institute

Global Terrestrial Reference Systems and Frames: Application to the International Terrestrial Reference System/Frame

Data base of Italian velocities and strain rates at permanent GNSS sites. A. Caporali, M. Bertocco, J. Zurutuza, University of Padova

The Kinematic Reference Frame for ITRF

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

THE SITUATION IN EASTERN EUROPE ABOUT GEOID / QUASIGEOID MODELS DETERMINATION

FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PAPERS

5 Coordinate Reference Systems

A Multi-Purpose Continuous GPS Network within the boundary zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian plates

Strategy for the Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)

Common Realization of Terrestrial and Celestial Reference Frame

Dimitrios Ampatzidis 1 and Nikolaos Demirtzoglou 2. Introduction

Monitoring and Analysis

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 23

The Geodetic Infrastructure in Europe - today and tomorrow

MAR-E1004 Basics of GIS: Georeferencing Jaakko Madetoja Slides adopted from Paula Ahonen-Rainio

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG

Global vertical datum unification based on the combination of the fixed gravimetric and the scalar free geodetic boundary value problems

One Year with Our Absolute Gravimeter

Transformation between the Local and Global Geodetic Datum in Croatia

CEGRN Consortium. A first campaign took place in Since 1997, each two years, a weekly campaign has been observed, normally in June.

Evaluation of height network in Latvia

The New Swedish Height System RH 2000 and Geoid Model SWEN 05LR

Assessment of the orbit-related sea level error budget for the TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry mission

E. Calais Purdue University - EAS Department Civil 3273

European Vertical Reference System (EVRS) 2007 a Combination of UELN and ECGN

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

Do we need to update PNG94 to PNG2020?

Transcription:

A new transformation including deformation model for the Nordic Presented at the FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 2, 2017 in Helsinki, Finland and Baltic countries P. Häkli, M. Lidberg, L. Jivall, T. Nørbech, O. Tangen, M. Weber, P. Pihlak, I. Liepiņš, and E. Paršeliūnas 29 May 2 June, 2017, FIG Working Week 2017, Helsinki, Finland N K G

Global, regional and local reference frames ITRF Global RF: dynamic/kinematic Rigid plate motions, deformations at plate boundaries, intraplate and local motions Regional/local RF: mostly static Minimized coordinate variations in time ETRS89 14 (6) par.

Case ETRS89 Eurasian plate is not stable: intraplate deformations caused by the post-glacial rebound in the Nordic countries. Also deformations at the plate boundary zones. By definition ETRS89 is coincident with ITRS at epoch 1989.0 and co-moving with the stable Eurasian plate goal to minimize coordinate variations in time BUT

Post-glacial rebound (Glacial Isostatic Adjustment, land uplift) Post-glacial rebound (PGR) changes coordinates in the Nordic-Baltic area, affects mostly to heights (up to 10 mm/yr) but small horizontal component as well Nordic-Baltic ETRS89 realizations mostly established in the 1990 s 10-20 years of deformations compared to present-day coordinates PGR effect cannot be neglected in accurate georeferencing applications and in the maintenance of national ETRS89 realizations NKG_RF03vel intraplate model velocities Horizontal Vertical

Consequences of the PGR effect Eventually static reference frame becomes too distorted - deformations must be accounted for somehow Regular updates of static reference frame or semi-dynamic or dynamic reference frame Time tag for the coordinates a prerequisite! Good deformation model crucial Common practices (standards) for utilizing the model needed

Motivation Project of the Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG): 1. To ensure, improve and update the accurate transformations (incl. deformation model) from global ITRFs to the national ETRS89 realizations in the Nordic/Baltic area Needed for most accurate georeferencing/geospatial data that is collected in a global frame (using e.g. GNSS) and needs to be stored in a national reference frame (semi-dynamic reference frame) 2. Establish an accurate and homogeneous common reference frame in the Nordic-Baltic-Arctic region e.g.: expressing GNSS/levelling data in a common reference frame in order to evaluate new Nordic geoid model cross-border applications

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) Nordic-Baltic common frame: Conventional frame of ETRS89: ETRF2000 Conventional epoch in the Nordic- Baltic countries for land uplift: 2000.0 Input coordinates in ITRF2008: Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG) set up a Nordic-Baltic-Arctic GPS campaign in 2008 ETRF2000(2000.0) National coordinates in ETRS89: Different versions of ETRFyy and realization (reference) epochs tr National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) 1 EUREF: P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) P EUREF (2008.75) De facto EUREF (memo) transformation: No epoch/pgr correction NOT sufficient for cm-level access to the national realizations ETRF2000(2008.75) ETRF2000(2008.75) minus Nat. ETRS89 ETRF2000(2000.0) National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) EUREF: P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) P EUREF (2008.75) ETRF2000(2008.75) V NKG_RF03vel 1 NKG2003: 2a P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) 2b ITRF2008(2000.0) V ITRF2000-PMM 2. additional intraplate V NKG_RF03vel corrections + V NKG_RF03vel ITRF2000(2003.75) (NKG_RF03) V NKG_RF03vel V ITRF2008-PMM + V NKG_RF03vel Selected NKG approach: 1. EUREF (memo) transformation P IERS (2000.0) Common NKG reference frame aligned to ETRF2000(2000.0), designated as NKG_ETRF00 3a ITRF2000(2000.0) P EUREF (2000.0) 3b P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) V ITRF2000-PMM + V NKG_RF03vel ETRF2000(2000.0) ITRF2000(2003.75/t r ) ITRF2008(2008.75/t r ) Helmert @2000.0 3. transformation parameters between the NKG_ETRF00 and (intraplate-corrected) national ETRS89 coordinates Helmert @2003.75/t r Helmert @2008.75/t r ETRF2000(2000.0) Helmert @2000.0 V NKG_RF03vel National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5) V NKG_RF03vel

NKG2008 transformation ITRFxx(tc) EUREF: P IERS (tc) ITRF2000(tc) ETRF2000(tc) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (2000.0-tc) P EUREF (tc) P = P IERS (tc) + P EUREF (tc) + P NKG1 (2000.0) NKG common frame: ETRF2000(2000.0) P NKG1,CC (2000.0) P NKG2,CC (2000.0) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (tr-tc) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (tr-2000.0) V NKG_RF03vel (tr-2000.0) National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: tr) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) 1 EUREF: P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) P EUREF (2008.75) ETRF2000(2008.75) Accuracy of the intraplate velocity model: Intraplate corrections are applied in ETRF2000 should be consistent with ETRF2000 velocities (EPN cumulative solution of class A stations used as a reference) RMS (NEU): 0.34/0.18/0.42 mm/yr ETRF2000 minus NKG_RF03vel re-aligned V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 ETRF2000(2000.0) Helmert @2000.0 V NKG_RF03vel National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) 1 EUREF: P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) P EUREF (2008.75) ETRF2000(2008.75) Common NKG reference frame alignment: RMS (NEU): Initial GNSS solution in IGb08(2008.75): 1/1/3 mm Common RF in ETRF2000(2000.0): 3.5/2.4/5.4 mm Comparison to EPN cumulative solution of class A stations V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 ETRF2000(2000.0) Helmert @2000.0 V NKG_RF03vel National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

NKG2008 campaign ITRF2008(2008.75) 1 EUREF: P IERS (2008.75) ITRF2000(2008.75) P EUREF (2008.75) ETRF2000(2008.75) Transformation residuals (country-wise): Reflect the consistency of input coordinates (NKG2008 and national ETRS89) and used deformation model Mostly some mm-level 3D residuals V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 ETRF2000(2000.0) Helmert @2000.0 V NKG_RF03vel National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: t r ) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

Examples of the use of NKG2008 transformation Nordic-Baltic NKG2015 geoid model: GNSS/levelling data to the common reference frame Finland: official EUREF-FIN coordinates for network-rtk services with NKG2008 transformation (incl. NKG_RF03vel model) 1. Positions in latest ITRFyy at epoch of observations 2. NKG2008 transformation National EUREF-FIN coordinates (ETRF96 at reference epoch 1997.0) Better than 1cm agreement

Future work and updates ITRFxx(tc) EUREF: P IERS (tc) ITRF2000(tc) ETRF2000(tc) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (2000.0-tc) P EUREF (tc) P = P IERS (tc) + P EUREF (tc) + P NKG1 (2000.0) NKG common frame: ETRF2000(2000.0) P NKG1,CC (2000.0) P NKG2,CC (2000.0) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (tr-tc) V NKG_RF03vel_ETRF2000 (tr-2000.0) V NKG_RF03vel (tr-2000.0) National ETRS89 realizations (epoch: tr) - DK: ETRF92(1994.704) - EE: ETRF96(1997.56) - FO: ETRF2000(2008.75) - FI: ETRF96(1997.0) - LV: ETRF89(1992.75) - LT: ETRF2000(2003.75) - NO: ETRF93(1995.0) - SE: ETRF97(1999.5)

Conclusions The developed transformation allows accurate access to national realizations and is an implementation for national semi-dynamic reference frames Common NKG frame fulfill current (urgent) needs, e.g. for GNSS/levelling data for a new Nordic geoid model But we ll continue improving the procedure and models Also more focus on making these (still non-standardized) transformations available to users See presentation 9156 by Evers and Knudsen: Transformation pipelines for PROJ.4, Thursday 11:00-12:30

More information: Articles: Häkli et al.: The NKG2008 GPS campaign final transformation results and a new common Nordic reference frame, Journal of Geodetic Science, Volume 6, Issue 1 (Mar 2016), open access: https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2016-0001 Häkli et al.: FIG2017 Working Week paper pasi.hakli@nls.fi