Moore et al Kenney et al. 2004

Similar documents
How environment shapes galaxy evolution: the satellite galaxies' perspective

Galaxy Activity in Semi Analytical Models. Fabio Fontanot (INAF OATs) Ljubljana 05/04/11

Element abundance ratios and star formation quenching: satellite versus central galaxies

Feedback in Galaxy Clusters

AGN feedback and its influence on massive galaxy evolution

Numerical Cosmology & Galaxy Formation

Upcoming class schedule

2. Galaxy Evolution and Environment

The Iguaçu Lectures. Nonlinear Structure Formation: The growth of galaxies and larger scale structures

Galaxy groups: X-ray scaling relations, cool cores and radio AGN

Formation and growth of galaxies in the young Universe: progress & challenges

On the influence of environment on star-forming galaxies

Galaxy Ecology. an Environmental Impact Assessment. Frank van den Bosch (MPIA)

Galaxy evolution in clusters from the CLASH-VLT survey

The theoretical view of high-z Clusters. Nelson Padilla, PUC, Chile Pucón, November 2009

Galaxy Ecology. an Environmental Impact Assessment. Frank van den Bosch (MPIA)

Lessons from the Virgo Cluster

AGN/Galaxy Co-Evolution. Fabio Fontanot (HITS)

The Illustris simulation: a new look at galaxy black hole co-evolution. Debora Sijacki IoA & KICC Cambridge

The evolution of satellite galaxy quenching. Sean McGee University of Birmingham

Next Generation (Semi-)Empirical galaxy formation models - Matching individual galaxies

Trends in Intracluster Metallicity

Role of the Environment in the Evolution of Galaxies Richard Ellis

A Self-Consistent, Dynamic Model for the Evolution of the Galaxy-Dark Matter Connection across Cosmic Time. Frank van den Bosch.

Gas accretion in Galaxies

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 17 Jan 2011

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 11 Feb 2011

Simulations of quasar feedback

HI as a probe for dwarf galaxy evolution in different environments: Voids to clusters

What can we learn from galaxy clustering measurements II. Shaun Cole Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University

Galaxy Systems in the Optical and Infrared. Andrea Biviano INAF/Oss.Astr.Trieste

Mergers, AGN, and Quenching

Galaxy formation and evolution II. The physics of galaxy formation

Feedback and Galaxy Formation

Galaxy clusters. Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems April 6, 2018

On the Assembly of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos

Thermo- and chemo-dynamics of the ICM with simulations

Galaxy Formation: Overview

AGN Feedback In an Isolated Elliptical Galaxy

Origin of Bi-modality

The Monster Roars: AGN Feedback & Co-Evolution with Galaxies

the self-regulated agn feedback loop: chaotic cold accretion

Black Hole Feedback. What is it? What does it do? Richard Bower Durham University

Galaxy Cluster Mergers & Star Formation

Star formation feedback in galaxy formation models. Yu Lu (KIPAC/Stanford)

The Galaxy Dark Matter Connection

Clusters of Galaxies Ch 7 S&G! Coma Cluster-the nearest massive cluster! The apparent nature of clusters depends on the wavelength one looks at!

Galaxy Evolution & Black-Hole Growth (review)

Part 2. Hot gas halos and SMBHs in optically faint ellipticals. Part 3. After Chandra?

HYDRODYNAMICAL SIMULATIONS OF GALAXY CLUSTERS

AGN/Galaxy Co-Evolution. Fabio Fontanot (HITS) AGN10 11/09/12

Two Phase Formation of Massive Galaxies

Galaxy formation in WMAP1andWMAP7 cosmologies

Theoretical ideas About Galaxy Wide Star Formation! Star Formation Efficiency!

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation

The Magneticum Simulations, from Galaxies to Galaxy Clusters

Embedded Spiral Patterns in the massive galaxy cluster Abell 1835

Galaxy evolution in the cosmic web: galaxy clusters

Cosmic Structure Formation on Supercomputers (and laptops)

The Galaxy Dark Matter Connection

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

Stellar populations in the cd galaxy NGC 3311

Galaxy Evolution. Part 4. Jochen Liske Hamburger Sternwarte

Feedback, AGN and galaxy formation. Debora Sijacki

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

PATRICIA B. TISSERA. Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics Argentina

The Millennium Simulation: cosmic evolution in a supercomputer. Simon White Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

The Merger History of Massive Galaxies: Observations and Theory

Intergalactic stellar populations at z=0.3

THE CONNECTION BETWEEN STAR FORMATION AND DARK MATTER HALOS AS SEEN IN THE INFRARED

The Distribution of Stellar Mass in Galaxy Clusters since z=1

Formation and cosmic evolution of supermassive black holes. Debora Sijacki

Star Formation in Brightest Cluster Galaxies in Cool Cores:

Cosmological simulations of our Universe Debora Sijacki IoA & KICC Cambridge

Contents. List of Participants

Structure of Dark Matter Halos

Bright Cluster Galaxy formation and the role of AGN feedback. Romain Teyssier

AGN feedback and the connection to triggering

Black Hole Mergers at Galactic. The Final Parsec: Supermassive. Centers. Milos Milosavljevic. California Institute of Technology

The effect of ram pressure on the star formation, mass distribution and morphology of galaxies

The ghost light of Abell Mireia Montes

The Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Clusters

Building the Red Sequence

Observational Evidence of AGN Feedback

The separate formation of different galaxy components

Baryon Census in Hydrodynamical Simulations of Galaxy Clusters

The Magic Scale of Galaxy Formation: SNe & Hot CGM --> Compaction & BHs

Supernova Feedback in Low and High Mass Galaxies: Luke Hovey 10 December 2009

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

Clustering studies of ROSAT/SDSS AGN through cross-correlation functions with SDSS Galaxies

Gasflows in Galaxy Clusters

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

The importance of galactic fountain in galaxy evolution

Coupling small and large scales: how massive and dying stars drive the formation of a galaxy

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 20 Aug 2014

The Different Physical Mechanisms that Drive the Star-formation Histories of Giant and Dwarf Galaxies

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei

Black Holes and Galaxy Formation. Karl Gebhardt (UT Austin)

The Impact of Minor Mergers

Transcription:

Moore et al. 1996 Kenney et al. 2004 (i) Interaction with other cluster members and/or with the cluster potential (ii) Interactions with the hot gas that permeates massive galaxy systems. The influence of these processes and their characteristic time-scales have been studied using detailed numerical simulations. Kronberger et al. 2008

Galaxy mergers: e.g. Negroponte & White 82, Barnes & Hernquist 91, 92, 96 Mihos & Hernquist 94, 96, Harassment: e.g. Spitzer & Baade 51, Richstone 76, Farouki & Shapiro 81, Moore et al. 96, Moore et al. 98 Gas stripping: e.g. Gunn & Gott 72, Cowie & Songaila 77, Nulsen 82, Quilis et al. 00 Strangulation: e.g. Larson, Tinsley & Caldwell 80, Balogh, Navarro & Morris 00 AGN heating: e.g. Churazov et al. 01, Brueggen et al. 02, Della Vecchia et al. 04, Sijacki & Springel 06 Cannibalism: e.g. Ostriker & Tremaine 75, White 76, Makumuth & Richstone 84, Merritt 85 WHERE : field + low velocity dispersion groups WHAT : strong internal dynamical response WHERE : in massive clusters WHAT : some damage but less than mergers at least on luminous members WHERE : very central regions of clusters WHAT : suppression of SF, indirect influence on morphology WHERE : any larger structure WHAT : suppression of SF, indirect influence (time-scale longer than gas stripping?) WHERE : centre of massive groups/clusters WHAT : suppression of cooling flows WHERE : groups and clusters WHAT : formation of BCGs?

Recent numerical work has shown that halo properties (e.g. spin, concentration, shape) show environmental dependencies: haloes in over-dense regions form statistically earlier and merge more rapidly than haloes in regions of the Universe with average density. Gao et al. 2005 Note that, at face value, these results invalidate the basic assumption of the HOD approach, i.e. that the galaxy content of a dark matter halo depends only on its mass.

An crucial ingredient to avoid an excess of massive galaxies, and to keep the stellar populations of these galaxies old. Ensemble-averaged power sufficient to offset cooling, but not clear how this happens. The Perseus Cluster's X-Ray Skull Credit: A. Fabian et al. Croton et al. 2006 Radio galaxies regulate the cooling flows? ( Tabor & Binney 1993 ) Supported by X-ray observations and demographics of radio-loud galaxies ( Best et al. 2007 )

Sijacki & Springel 2006 Detailed simulations are carried out by different groups. These have shown that the outcome of this feedback mode depends critically on a number of unknown parameters (e.g. duty cycle, gas viscosity, geometry of the energy injection) Fabjan et al. 2009 Current numerical implementations result in an efficient extraction of enriched gas from star forming regions at high-z. This leads affects e.g. the metallicity pattern of the ICM

While current models successfully reproduce the old stellar populations observed for massive galaxies, they all fail in reproducing their observed chemical abundances. This appears to be the case also in hydrodynamical simulations (McCarthy et al. 2010). De Lucia & Borgani 2012 Switching off the radio mode would increase only slightly the metallicity of these galaxies, and make them significantly younger.

Formation of DSC parallels that of the BCGs. In hydro simulations, most of it comes from particles unbound during mergers, with a minor fraction coming from tidal stripping of satellites. Unfortunately, simulation results do not converge: increasing resolution leads to increasing ICL fractions. Puchwein et al. 2010 Murante et al. 2007 A significant fraction of DSC (up to 30%!) forms in cold gas clouds stripped from infalling structures. Not clear if (and how much of) this `intra-cluster star formation is just due to spurious numerical effects (e.g. fluid instabilities might be able to destroy these clouds and reduce this contribution).

The fraction of blue (satellite) galaxies in the models is below the observational data, more so in low-mass haloes. It has been shown that this problem is shared by all models recently published (see e.g. Fontanot et al. 2009). Is this due to an oversimplified treatment of the strangulation? Weinmann et al. 2006

Strangulation usually assumed to be instantaneous. This implies a fast transition from the active to passive phase (also due to a strong supernovae feedback). Recent studies suggest that the stripping of hot gas occurs on longer time-scales, but results from simulations are not conclusive. Saro et al. 2010 McCarthy et al. 2008 gas dark matter

Weinmann et al. 2011 More recent models assume a noninstantaneous stripping of hot material. This material can cool on satellite galaxies and keep their star formation on for longer times making them bluer. This improves the agreement with observational data which is, however, not very good yet. Guo et al. 2011

De Lucia et al. 2012 Galaxies with small stellar mass become satellites at all times, while the (few) most massive galaxies tend to become satellite later, and they are typically accreted when sitting in relatively massive haloes. N.B. Down to ~4 Gyr (z=0.4) the cluster mass grows significantly through the accretion of few relatively massive structures. At lower z, it grows mostly through small structure and diffuse accretion.

De Lucia et al. 2012 Define a probability to be quenched by environment : f(r sat) f(r cent) / f(b cent) (van den Bosch et al., 2008) The fraction of satellite affected by environment varies (albeit weakly) with halo mass, increasing from ~40% to ~60% over the halo mass range considered. Critical environment given by 10 13 M sun haloes over 5-7 Gyr time-scale

A series of numerical simulations aimed to study the evolution of a disc galaxy within the global tidal field of a group environment. Both the disc galaxy and the group are modelled as multi-component N-body systems composed of dark matter and stars. Work in progress to evaluate the influence of interactions with other group galaxies, and gas. Villalobos et al. 2012

All models published in the last few years over-predict the number of intermediateto-low mass galaxies. Some more recent renditions solve this problem in the local Universe by invoking a very efficient SN feedback, but the excess remains at high redshift. Problem originates from an excess of galaxies with Vc~100-200 km/s at higher redshift (Fontanot et al. 2009). Liu et al. 2010 Guo et al. 2011 Satellite physics needs to be improved but this is not going to solve this problem (also present in hydro-simulations)

Circumstantial evidence for AGN feedback but this physical process is still included using schematic models, often not very well grounded in the observations. Details (geometry, duty cycle, energy coupling) still need to be understood. Current implementations are successful in reproducing the observed old ages of brightest cluster galaxies, but not their metal content that appears to be lower than observed. However, only playing with the AGN feedback is not going to solve this problem. Better stellar population estimates for BCGs are needed to constrain the models. The formation of massive central galaxies is associated with the that of the intra-cluster light. Simulation results have not converged and might be affected by numerical effects. More observational data (distributions, chemical compositions) are coming. Detailed theoretical predictions are needed.

Current theoretical models (including hydro-dynamical simulations) still have problems in reproducing the number densities and physical properties of the satellite galaxy population (At least some of the) observed trends are naturally explained by the growth of cosmic structure. A more efficient quenching in more massive haloes is not required (i.e. cluster-specific processes are NOT the main drivers for the observed trends). Several recent studies argue for long timescales for the suppression of the star formation in satellite galaxies. It is unclear how a gentle mode of strangulation could support cooling and star formation for several Gyr. The critical environment seems to be that of groups of mass 10 13 Msun. Unfortunately, this is the least studied environment from the numerical viewpoint.