Map Set 3: Impact on Population

Similar documents
Fracking for Tight Oil and Shale Gas in the U.S.

Location Suitability Analysis

Drilling & Developing the Marcellus Shale

Shale Gas; Wellbore Positioning Challenges

Experiential and Visual Impacts of Energy on the Pennsylvania Landscape

MUG Presentation. Quantifying Habitat Disturbance by Marcellus Shale Drilling Activities in Pennsylvania. Introduction. Previous Work.

Natural and Human Influences on Flood Zones in Wake County. Georgia Ditmore

Burket/Geneseo Shale Appalachia s little brother to the Marcellus & Utica

Exploring the Marcellus Shale using ArcGIS 3D Analyst

Black Road, Tax ID = , 22.7 ac Wilmot Township, Bradford County, PA. Geologic Summary

Spatial Analysis using Vector GIS THE GOAL: PREPARATION:

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and. the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

Key Stage 3 - Volcano Fracking

Bureau of Economic and Business Research May 29, Measuring Population Density for Counties in Florida

Lesson Report 3: Analyzing Spatial Data in a GIS. by Diana Jo Lau

Unconventional Natural Gas A Brief Review for Instituto Petroquimica Argentina

The Delaware Environmental Observing System

Gina Hunt Chesapeake Bay Program Fish Habitat Coordinator

Downloaded 10/25/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Cluster Analysis. Part of the Michigan Prosperity Initiative

DRAFT RURAL-URBAN POPULATION CHANGE IN PUERTO RICO, 1990 TO 2000

Characterizing Sources of Stream Turbidity in the Marcellus Shale Gas-Well Drilling Region in Central Pennsylvania

Ohio Oil and Gas Association - Exploration Committee Exploration Update

MIS 0855 Data Science (Section 005) Fall 2016 In-Class Exercise (Week 4) Visualizing with Maps

ROCKS OF THE LAKE CAYUGA BASIN, NEW YORK

OVERVIEW OF THE ROGERSVILLE SHALE IN WEST VIRGINIA. Philip Dinterman West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey May 11, 2017

Drilling Technology - The Emergence of New Risk, From A Loss Adjuster's Perspective

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

GIS Test Drive What a Geographic Information System Is and What it Can Do. Alison Davis-Holland

REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WATERSHED DELINEATION

Spatial Variation in Local Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes

MESOZOIC BASINS. North Carolina Geological Survey

PERCEPTION and Focus on Maps. Focus on Maps 8/29/2014. English and Dutch Maps from the 1600s and 1680 British Maps of N. Am.

Streams in the Ranching Country of South Texas

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

Petroleum Geology of Shale Gas & Tight Oil and How To Do It: Drill and Frack a Horizontal Well

Regional methane emissions estimates in northern Pennsylvania gas fields using a mesoscale atmospheric inversion system

Risk Identification using Hazus

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using ACS PUMS, CTPP and LODES

UTAH S STATEWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Introducing GIS analysis

INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS. Energy Symposium Master Drillers 8/12/2010. Shale Operations Charlie Scott 1. Operations in Pennsylvania & Shale Plays

A New Approach to Estimating Population Growth Along a Major Arterial Highway.

Data Visualization and Evaluation

Flood Insurance Study

Creation of an Internet Based Indiana Water Quality Atlas (IWQA)

STATE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Surface Use in the Age of the Marcellus: Will Horizontal Wells Be Considered Reasonably Necessary to Develop the Marcellus Shale?

A Case Study of Regional Dynamics of China 中国区域动态案例研究

Tax ID = ac Athens Township, Bradford County, PA. Geologic Summary

RELATIONAL DATA MODELING TO ENHANCE GIS-BASED VISUAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

Georeferencing Water Quality Assessments to NHDPlus Catchments

Shale Natural Resources. Stephen Ingram, North America Technology Manager, Halliburton

Population Trends Along the Coastal United States:

Kent F. Perry. Gas Technology Institute Des Plaines, Illinois. Paper Presented October 6, th World Gas Conference Buenos Aires, Argentina

Public Transit Accessibility vs. Employment: A Comparative Assessment of Counties/Cities in Northern Virginia

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 7, No 1, 2016

Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Purcellville, Virginia

DOWNLOAD OR READ : USA PLANNING MAP PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Outline 16: The Mesozoic World: Formation of Oil Deposits (with a side trip to the Devonian Marcellus Shale)

Applications on Slope Land Management through GIS Technology

Shale Capacity Key In Shale Modeling

Running Head: Fracking Analysis in North Carolina 1 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FRACKING IN NORTH CAROLINA. Matthew B. Aupperle

Project Geology RPSEA. GTI Project Technology. February 15, is a low. Similar to. Marcellus Gas Shale. area follows.

Microseismic data illuminate fractures in the Montney

Effective Use of Geographic Maps

Link to USGS Phase 6 Land Use Viewer website:

Title: High resolution geographical information system for assessing vineyard site suitability

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Drilling & Fracking a well near Grass River: Notes from an informal conversation with O.I.L. Energy

GIS and Cartography at the University of Toronto Technical Paper Series - Paper no. 2

Neighborhood social characteristics and chronic disease outcomes: does the geographic scale of neighborhood matter? Malia Jones

NSF CNH-Ex # Political Fragmentation Indicator Database (Version 3.01)

Geospatial Analysis and Optimization Techniques to Select Site for New Business: The Case Study of Washtenaw County, Michigan, USA

Development and Land Use Change in the Central Potomac River Watershed. Rebecca Posa. GIS for Water Resources, Fall 2014 University of Texas

Population Profiles

Identifying Megaregions in the US: Implications for Infrastructure Investment

Figure 0-18: Dendrogeomorphic analysis of streambank erosion and floodplain deposition (from Noe and others, 2015a)

Answer Questions 1 4

Advances in Geosteering

What Can Microseismic Tell Us About Hydraulic Fracturing?

LOOKING FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPRAWL AND WATER QUALITY: A CASE STUDY OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NJ

GED 554 IT & GIS. Lecture 6 Exercise 5. May 10, 2013

RAILROAD CoMMIssIoN OF TEXAS

Spatial and Socioeconomic Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using LODES, CTPP, and ACS PUMS

Graphing Data. Example:

Employment Capacity in Transit Station Areas in Maryland

An Internet-Based Integrated Resource Management System (IRMS)

High resolution population grid for the entire United States

Mapping Maine s Working Waterfront: for Our Heritage and Economy

NetRA Resources Assessment (NetRA) 1

THE MARCELLUS SHALE GAS PLAY Geology, Development, and Water-Resource Impact Mitigation

For personal use only

Chapter 2: Description of Planning Area

Essential Academic Skills Subtest III: Mathematics (003)

APPENDIX C-3 Equitable Target Areas (ETA) Technical Analysis Methodology

Carrying Capacity: A New Model For Mature Cities (UC359 )

Example: What number is the arrow pointing to?

Transcription:

The Potential Environmental Impacts of Full Development of the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania Sep 216 Map Set 3: Impact on Population This series of maps displays information related to the potential environmental impacts of additional gas development in Pennsylvania if all remaining technically recoverable resources in the Interior Marcellus shale were developed using high volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling with eight wells per well pad. This map set includes projections of the total land area and population in Pennsylvania projected to be within.5 and 1 miles of well pad locations. The population estimates are based on the 21 population in US Census block data. Population and land area estimates are aggregated by county in the maps. Note: These maps contain projections of natural gas development and associated impacts under a particular set of circumstances and assumptions. Changes to the assumptions could change the results. They are not predictions of development or impacts, and should not be used for commercial purposes, to guide investment decisions, or for short-range planning decisions. Furthermore, the maps should not be used to inform planning or decision making for geographic units smaller than the primary units of analysis (counties or HUC-1 watersheds). Population Impact Maps This map set includes projections of the following land and population impacts: 3.1 Area within.5 mile of well pads 3.2 Area within 1 mile of well pads 3.3 Population within.5 mile of well pads 3.4 Population within 1 mile of well pads For additional documentation and methodology used to create these maps, please download the research report at: www.cna.org/pa-marcellus IRM-216-U-13695

Map 3.1 - Area within.5 miles of Well Pads by County Interior Marcellus Boundary N e w Yo r k 2 4 8 % of County Area Virginia County Area within.5 mile of Well Pads Statewide Impact - Area <.5 from Well Pad : 1,813 sq. mi. Projection: 6,354 sq. mi. New Jer sey Marcellus Formation Extent This map shows the portion of county area within.5 miles of well pads, both currently, and additional projected. This metric forms the basis for assessing population impact, and is one way to assess portion of county area impacted by gas developement. Area w/in.5 Mi of Well Pad Counties With Development * No Development * Includes current wells in any part of Marcellus formation.

Map 3.2 - Area within 1 mile of Well Pads by County New Interior Marcellus Boundary Statewide Impact - Area <1 Mi from Well Pad 4,68 sq. mi. : Projection: 14,54 sq. mi. 2 4 8 Virginia % County Area Area w/in 1 mi of Well Pad County Area within 1 mile of Well Pads New Jer sey Marcellus Formation Extent This map shows the portion of county area within 1 mile of well pads, both currently, and additonal projected. This metric forms the basis for assessing population impact, and Y o isr kone way to assess the portion of county area impacted by gas developement. Counties With Development No Development

Map 3.3 - Population within.5 miles of well pad locations. 4 8 Projected Population within.5 miles of Well Pads Total by County % County Population <1, 1,-1, 1,-2, 4,-6, 2,-4, 6,-1, >1, (Max 114,) ware 2 Del a Statewide Impact - Population at <.5 mi : 1,6 People Projection: 639, People rs ey Je w Ne w Yor k Ne This map shows the county population, estimated from 21 Census Block data, that could be within.5 miles of a Marcellus well pad. The pie charts show the portion of the county population that is currently within (yellow) and additional population projected (dark red) to be within this distance.

Map 3.4 - Population within 1 mile of well pad locations. 4 8 Projected Population within 1 mile of Well Pads Total by County % County Population <1, 1,-1, 1,-2, 4,-6, 2,-4, 6,-1, >1, (Max 397,) ware 2 Del a Statewide Impact - Population at < 1 mi : 311, People Projection: 1,822, People rs ey Je w Ne w Yor k Ne This map shows the county population, estimated from 21 Census Block data, that could be within 1 mile of a Marcellus well pad. The pie charts show the portion of the county population that is currently within (yellow) and additional population projected (dark red) to be within this distance.