Improving the quality of Velocity Models and Seismic Images. Alice Chanvin-Laaouissi

Similar documents
SeisLink Velocity. Key Technologies. Time-to-Depth Conversion

Anisotropic Depth Migration and High-Resolution Tomography in Gulf of Mexico: A Case History

Merging chronostratigraphic modeling and global interpretation Emmanuel Labrunye, Stanislas Jayr, Paradigm

A Southern North Sea Multi-Survey presdm using Hybrid Gridded Tomography

C031 Quantifying Structural Uncertainty in Anisotropic Depth Imaging - Gulf of Mexico Case Study

G002 An Integrated Regional Framework for Seismic Depth Imaging in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico

Principles of 3-D Seismic Interpretation and Applications

Quantitative Seismic Interpretation An Earth Modeling Perspective

Tu N Fault Shadow Removal over Timor Trough Using Broadband Seismic, FWI and Fault Constrained Tomography

Building an Integrated Static Reservoir Model 5-day Course

23855 Rock Physics Constraints on Seismic Inversion

Velocity Update Using High Resolution Tomography in Santos Basin, Brazil Lingli Hu and Jianhang Zhou, CGGVeritas

H005 Pre-salt Depth Imaging of the Deepwater Santos Basin, Brazil

NEW GEOLOGIC GRIDS FOR ROBUST GEOSTATISTICAL MODELING OF HYDROCARBON RESERVOIRS

The progressive role of Quantitative Seismic Interpretation Unlocking subsurface opportunities From qualitative to quantitative

Interval anisotropic parameters estimation in a least squares sense Case histories from West Africa

Fred Mayer 1; Graham Cain 1; Carmen Dumitrescu 2; (1) Devon Canada; (2) Terra-IQ Ltd. Summary

We Improved Salt Body Delineation Using a new Structure Extraction Workflow

A Petroleum Geologist's Guide to Seismic Reflection

Depth Imaging for Unconventional Reservoir Characterization: Canadian Plains Case Study

Demo Schedule and Abstracts

Depth Imaging through Surface Carbonates: A 2D example from the Canadian Rocky Mountains

Multiple horizons mapping: A better approach for maximizing the value of seismic data

Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys

Tu N Estimation of Uncertainties in Fault Lateral Positioning on 3D PSDM Seismic Image - Example from the NW Australian Shelf

Dip-constrained tomography with weighting flow for paleo-canyons: a case study in Para- Maranhao Basin, Brazil Guang Chen and Lingli Hu, CGG

An Integrated Workflow for Seismic Data Conditioning and Modern Prestack Inversion Applied to the Odin Field. P.E.Harris, O.I.Frette, W.T.

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Summary. Introduction

B033 Improving Subsalt Imaging by Incorporating MT Data in a 3D Earth Model Building Workflow - A Case Study in Gulf of Mexico

Velocity model building in complex media by multi-layer non-linear slope tomography. Summary Introduction Non-linear slope tomography

We A10 12 Common Reflection Angle Migration Revealing the Complex Deformation Structure beneath Forearc Basin in the Nankai Trough

PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Thirty-Eighth Annual Convention & Exhibition, May 2014

Hybrid Gridded Tomography. Ian F. Jones Mick Sugrue Pierre Hardy. GX Technology, 180 High Street, Egham, Surrey TW20 9DN, UK

Bulletin of Earth Sciences of Thailand

QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION

Use of prestack depth migration for improving the accuracy of horizontal drilling in unconventional reservoirs

VELOCITY REDUCTION - A POINT IN VELOCITY MODEL BUILDING FOR PRE-STACK KIRCHOFF DEPTH MIGRATION

2010 SEG SEG Denver 2010 Annual Meeting

Using Curvature to Map Faults, Fractures

Summary. Tomography with geological constraints

Multiple realizations: Model variance and data uncertainty

SUMMARY ANGLE DECOMPOSITION INTRODUCTION. A conventional cross-correlation imaging condition for wave-equation migration is (Claerbout, 1985)

Pre Stack Imaging To Delineate A New Hydrocarbon Play A Case History

Duplex Wave Migration

Daniele Colombo* Geosystem-WesternGeco, Calgary, AB M.Virgilio Geosystem-WesternGeco, Milan, Italy.

Porosity. Downloaded 09/22/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Delineating Karst features using Advanced Interpretation

2012 SEG SEG Las Vegas 2012 Annual Meeting Page 1

Residual Statics using CSP gathers

Seismic Guided Drilling: Near Real Time 3D Updating of Subsurface Images and Pore Pressure Model

HampsonRussell. A comprehensive suite of reservoir characterization tools. cgg.com/geosoftware

Summary. Introduction

Time-lapse filtering and improved repeatability with automatic factorial co-kriging. Thierry Coléou CGG Reservoir Services Massy

The 2D/3D i-stats Workflow for Image-Based Near-Surface Modeling for Statics Corrections

Dirty salt velocity inversion: The road to a clearer subsalt image

Imaging complex structure with crosswell seismic in Jianghan oil field

Multiattributes and Seismic Interpretation of Offshore Exploratory Block in Bahrain A Case Study

Seismic Velocities for Pore-Pressure Prediction. Some Case Histories.

The coherence cube. MIKE BAHORICH Amoco Corporation Denver, CO. Faults parallel to strike. Conventional amplitude time

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Stochastic vs Deterministic Pre-stack Inversion Methods. Brian Russell

Caracterização de. Michelle Uchôa Chaves Geóloga SIS Brasil

Time vs depth in a North Sea case study of the ugly truth Abstract

Modeling Optimizes Asset Performance By Chad Baillie

An Integrated approach for faults and fractures delineation with dip and curvature attributes

Use of Geostatistically-constrained Potential Field Inversion and Downhole Drilling to Predict Distribution of Sulphide and Uranium Mineralisation

Stratimagic. Seismic Facies Classification

Chapter 1. Introduction EARTH MODEL BUILDING

Fracture characterization from scattered energy: A case study

Investigating fault shadows in a normally faulted geology

PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCES GEOLOGY OR GEOPHYSICS MAJOR

Tarek S. Ellaithy 1, Alexander Prexl 1, Nicolas Daynac 2. (1) DEA Egypt Branches, (2) Eliis SAS, France. Introduction

Applying full-azimuth angle domain imaging to study carbonate reefs at great depths

3D beam prestack depth migration with examples from around the world

INTEGRATED GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION METHODS FOR HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION

Reservoir connectivity uncertainty from stochastic seismic inversion Rémi Moyen* and Philippe M. Doyen (CGGVeritas)

Geohazards have a direct impact on the drilling and

3D Converted Wave Data Processing A case history

Reservoir characterization

PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)

Stanford Exploration Project, Report 115, May 22, 2004, pages

Department of Geosciences M.S. Thesis Proposal

3D geostatistical porosity modelling: A case study at the Saint-Flavien CO 2 storage project

Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration in Earth Models

Seismic attributes of time-vs. depth-migrated data using self-adaptive window

Constrained Fault Construction

ANISOTROPIC PRESTACK DEPTH MIGRATION: AN OFFSHORE AFRICA CASE STUDY

W011 Full Waveform Inversion for Detailed Velocity Model Building

Time to Depth Conversion and Uncertainty Characterization for SAGD Base of Pay in the McMurray Formation, Alberta, Canada*

Seismic Driven Pore Pressure Prediction

We A1 12 Method to Generate a Watertight Geological Model Directly From a Seismic Volume

TOM 2.6. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 2581

Geological Expression A New Approach to Volume Interpretation. Gaynor Paton, ffa

Improving Resolution with Spectral Balancing- A Case study

Observations of Azimuthal Anisotropy in Prestack Seismic Data

Recent developments in object modelling opens new era for characterization of fluvial reservoirs

A seismic reservoir characterization and porosity estimation workflow to support geological model update: pre-salt reservoir case study, Brazil

Regularizing seismic inverse problems by model reparameterization using plane-wave construction

Patterns in Geophysical Data and Models

Transcription:

Improving the quality of Velocity Models and Seismic Images Alice Chanvin-Laaouissi 2015, 2015, PARADIGM. PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RESERVED.

Velocity Volumes Challenges 1. Define sealed 3D framework for velocity interpolation 2. Perform geologically constrained velocity models 3. Update velocity models 2

How to define a sealed 3D framework for velocity modeling? By construction SKUA models are built in 3D volumes SKUA models = Sealed models Perfect data carrier for velocity modeling studies 3D framework automatically built with structural model no time loss UVT transform Geologically constrained velocity model 3

Creation of geologically constrained velocity models SKUA can model any structural and stratigraphic complexities Framework for velocity modeling is a perfect representation of the geological reality hence reduces uncertainties on time/depth conversion SKUA model in extensive environment, complex fault network SKUA model in compressive environment SKUA Model around intrusive structure SKUA model built around a Salt structure and related velocity model - perfect framework for velocity modeling 4

Creation of geologically constrained velocity models Simple to advanced interpolation of velocity: Multiple data input: Stacking velocities, checkshot, sonic, well markers Multiple geostatistical methods (from simple interpolation to kriging with external drift), allowing noise removal SKUA Geological grid = ideal support for geostatistics computation (no cell distorsion) Improved model accuracy by combining different velocity data sources and by using appropriate methods for velocity interpolation along stratigraphy SKUA grid built around a Salt structure and related geologically constrained velocity model Velocity inputs can be interpolated within the SKUA model using various geostatistics methods

Example of Velocity model creation from Sonic Logs Import Sonic as well log Display and QC Sonic in Log display On Wells defined velocity log derived from Sonic On Geologic grid use kriging with external drift (hard data= velocity logs) and drift property derived from Depth Conversion law Sonic displayed in Well section Variogram analysis on residuals SKUA model in extensive environment, filled with Sonic derived velocity Velocity law V=f(TWT) derived from Sonic

Property model editor to fully take advantage of the SKUA model Various methods available to interpolate velocity on sealed SKUA model Ability to combine multiple velocity inputs and use multiple velocity methods for advanced velocity modeling Easily create multiple velocity models within the same study for better understanding of structural uncertainty Geologically constrained Vint transferred from SKUA model to seismic cube. Co-rendering of seismic amplitude and Vint. Methods: Constant Linear function Exponential function User defined equations Linear Function of Property Interpolated Property From Grid Property From Surface of Layer Boundary Property 7

SKUA for tomography 2015, 2015, PARADIGM. PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RESERVED. 8

Goal Use the SKUA structural and stratigraphic model building capabilities in the depth imaging workflow. In particular important in geological regimes defined by faults, salt bodies, unconformities, etc. Background velocity model creation Depth imaging Depth Interpretation Model-building in SKUA (for complex models) Tomography updates/well tie updates 9

Paradigm 15: Current Status Horizon and fault picking (3D Canvas)* Epos-link SKUA model creation Grid-based tomography workflow Illumination studies Epos-link Volumes creations (Dip, Az, Formation, Velocity) Tsurfaces (Horizons and Faults) Improvements for grid based tomography and illumination. *Automatic picking of horizon (stratigraphic) patches can be performed to better constrain SKUA Model internal stratigraphic layering style 10

Support for Volumes In GeoDepth, seamlessly support Attribute Volumes created from SKUA models [epos-link]: Velocity Geological formation Dip, Azimuth Volumes exported in 32bit float format No NDVs to match Geodepth requirements 11

Dip and Azimuth Volumes New in P15 Dip and Azimuth Cube: Voxet > Compute > SKUA Model Curvature Varying Dip values within conformable stratigraphic layers 12

Dip and Azimuth Volumes New in P15 Example with erosions Varying Dip values within eroded stratigraphic layers 13

Stratigraphic patch extraction Additional automatic picking of horizon (stratigraphic) patches can be performed to better constrain internal stratigraphic layering style of the SKUA model Structural Model Building QC, interpretation and modeling validation Paleospace Computation Seed Generation Patch Propagation Geological Time Computation Geological Grid Building

Example of Usages of SKUA Generated Volumes for Tomography 2015, 2015, PARADIGM. PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RESERVED. 15

Usage of Formation Volume Tomography - Build Matrix, Interactive Ray Tracing Ray filtering by formations relevant for models containing salt bodies. 16

Usage of Formation Volume Grid Tomography- Solve Matrix: Final interpolation according to formation volume: Updated volumes better honor the structure. Update limits per formation. Update constraints per formation. Smoothing and sensitivity factors per formation. 17

Grid Tomography Interpolation Example Without Formation Volume With Formation Volume 18

An example of Salt Model Building Workflow Migration with Sediment Velocity Tomography Update for Sediments Migration and Pick Top of Salt Create Model with Salt flooding + Vel Modeling Grid Tomography With formation volume for filtering rays through salt body Migration and pick bottom of salt Build SKUA MODEL with Salt Grid Tomography using formation volume with no update of salt region 19

Inserting Salt Velocity Initial interpretation Related SKUA model and formation volume Pick top of salt Build salt surface with vertical flanks Sediment VINT Updated VINT Use background velocity model for sediment layers (Sediment VINT) Add Salt velocity with property model editor Create new SKUA model including Salt 20

Velocity model update with salt Per layer velocity model update 21

Advantages Geologically derived Dip/Azimuth volumes Geological formation volume can guide and control the Tomography updates for complex models. Faults and other discontinuities are honored properly in the velocity model to avoid imaging artifacts. Illumination workflow with complex models. 23

Paradigm 15.5 and beyond 2015, 2015, PARADIGM. PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RESERVED. 24

SKUA Model update from Tomography SKUA model update from vertical displacement in pencils

SKUA-GeoDepth Integration Plan P15: SKUA Volumes Enhances: Grid-Based Tomography Illumination RTM Modeling P15.5: SKUA Pencils Enhances: Model-Based Tomography workflow P16: Stratigraphic Column P16.5: SKUA Geological (coarse) grid for Tomography 26

SKUA-GeoDepth Integration Plan P15.5/P16 P15.5: SKUA Pencils Enhances: Model-Based Tomography workflow Benefits for the user: Pencils can be generated directly in SKUA from SKUA model (P15.5) Model-based Tomography provides updates that fully honors the structure. Use the depth updates to update a SKUA model - Sealed model remain sealed after Tomo iteration 27

Paradigm 15.5: Model-based Tomography Workflow Time Gathers Initial Interval Velocity Prestack Depth Migration Depth Gathers Depth Volume FastVel /Velocity Navigator AutoPicker Pencil Database Run Tomography Depth Interpretation Build Model in SKUA Updated Interval Velocity Rebuild Model from Displacements in Pencils (P16) Extract Pencils 28

Thank You 2015, 2015, PARADIGM. PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RESERVED.